<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Packers non-stock stock is for sale, for only the fifth time</title>
	<atom:link href="http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/12/06/packers-non-stock-stock-is-for-sale-for-only-the-fifth-time/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/12/06/packers-non-stock-stock-is-for-sale-for-only-the-fifth-time/</link>
	<description>ProFootballTalk on NBCSports.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 05:11:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: randomguy9999</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/12/06/packers-non-stock-stock-is-for-sale-for-only-the-fifth-time/#comment-1471552</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[randomguy9999]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Dec 2011 14:34:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=171418#comment-1471552</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m gonna start printing them and sell them on ebay as packers stock that is not actually stock that isnt actually real....  

using the pack fans&#039; logic on here, they should sell like hotcakes....]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m gonna start printing them and sell them on ebay as packers stock that is not actually stock that isnt actually real&#8230;.  </p>
<p>using the pack fans&#8217; logic on here, they should sell like hotcakes&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sergisbauer</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/12/06/packers-non-stock-stock-is-for-sale-for-only-the-fifth-time/#comment-1431540</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[sergisbauer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Dec 2011 13:22:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=171418#comment-1431540</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The people who criticize this are looking at it in an incredibly simple-minded way. No, of course owning this stock doesn&#039;t make anyone an &quot;owner&quot; in the sense that term is normally used. But think of the term &quot;ownership&quot; in the same way you&#039;d use it for, say, a project-- or a problem-- at work (&quot;I&#039;m taking ownership of that&quot;) and it&#039;s clear that the people who are buying stock are taking responsibility for the GBP franchise in a very real way: The team has a financial need, and the fans who already have an emotional investment in the team are backing it up with a financial investment. With no greedy &quot;real&quot; owner to suck profits away, they know the money is going to go straight to where it is needed, and benefit the franchise in a tangible way.

When you think about it as stepping up and taking responsibility for the financial future of the franchise rather than a &quot;what can I get out of this?&quot; attitude, I would say that every Packers fan who put up $250 in this stock issue has more &quot;ownership&quot; of the Packers than Zygi Wilf has of the Vikings.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The people who criticize this are looking at it in an incredibly simple-minded way. No, of course owning this stock doesn&#8217;t make anyone an &#8220;owner&#8221; in the sense that term is normally used. But think of the term &#8220;ownership&#8221; in the same way you&#8217;d use it for, say, a project&#8211; or a problem&#8211; at work (&#8220;I&#8217;m taking ownership of that&#8221;) and it&#8217;s clear that the people who are buying stock are taking responsibility for the GBP franchise in a very real way: The team has a financial need, and the fans who already have an emotional investment in the team are backing it up with a financial investment. With no greedy &#8220;real&#8221; owner to suck profits away, they know the money is going to go straight to where it is needed, and benefit the franchise in a tangible way.</p>
<p>When you think about it as stepping up and taking responsibility for the financial future of the franchise rather than a &#8220;what can I get out of this?&#8221; attitude, I would say that every Packers fan who put up $250 in this stock issue has more &#8220;ownership&#8221; of the Packers than Zygi Wilf has of the Vikings.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: truthserum4u</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/12/06/packers-non-stock-stock-is-for-sale-for-only-the-fifth-time/#comment-1431462</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[truthserum4u]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Dec 2011 10:13:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=171418#comment-1431462</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@ bobnelsonjr

Can&#039;t  beleive it&#039;s you!  Fairly nice post actually.

One thing seems to be incorrect though.  

&quot;Should the stockholders want a new President, GM, or Head Coach, they will let the board know. It IS an ownership voice in team affairs. &quot;

I heard Murphy on a radio interview specifically state the opposite.  He didn&#039;t mention President, but definately said stockholders have no voice in GM or Head Coach or team affairs.  Just an FYI.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ bobnelsonjr</p>
<p>Can&#8217;t  beleive it&#8217;s you!  Fairly nice post actually.</p>
<p>One thing seems to be incorrect though.  </p>
<p>&#8220;Should the stockholders want a new President, GM, or Head Coach, they will let the board know. It IS an ownership voice in team affairs. &#8221;</p>
<p>I heard Murphy on a radio interview specifically state the opposite.  He didn&#8217;t mention President, but definately said stockholders have no voice in GM or Head Coach or team affairs.  Just an FYI.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: phonecops</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/12/06/packers-non-stock-stock-is-for-sale-for-only-the-fifth-time/#comment-1431277</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[phonecops]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Dec 2011 04:07:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=171418#comment-1431277</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Life long Packer fan here. 
Love the idea, but not buying the stock.
Not because of principle or anger, just can&#039;t afford it. If they issued more of them for say $50 each, they might make more money.If I had the money, I&#039;d but one. I know it&#039;s practically worthless, but so is my picture of me with The Proclaimers;yet I put that on the wall in my den.
That being said, it does beat a PSL or tax to generate revenue.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Life long Packer fan here.<br />
Love the idea, but not buying the stock.<br />
Not because of principle or anger, just can&#8217;t afford it. If they issued more of them for say $50 each, they might make more money.If I had the money, I&#8217;d but one. I know it&#8217;s practically worthless, but so is my picture of me with The Proclaimers;yet I put that on the wall in my den.<br />
That being said, it does beat a PSL or tax to generate revenue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bobnelsonjr</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/12/06/packers-non-stock-stock-is-for-sale-for-only-the-fifth-time/#comment-1430710</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[bobnelsonjr]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2011 22:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=171418#comment-1430710</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When it comes to time for a new stadium or stadium renovations, owners chip in money.  The Packers have 112,000 owners (before this sale).  The Packers do not have a multi-billionaire owner who can kick in piles of cash.  

The Packers are at an economic disadvantage compared to the rest of owners.   Packers fans know that this stock sale will help the team be competitive with the rest of the league in revenues.  Lambeau Field will now become an 80,000 capacity stadium in a city of 105,000.  

The team will never move, and never have a Snyder or  Glazer run the team into the ground.  Nor does any Packers fan have to be a yes man to a franchise king like Al Davis who never opened the books.   The books are open for the public to see where the dollars go. 

The Packers owners vote for representatives on the board of directors to represent their wishes in how the team conducts business.  Should the stockholders want a new President, GM, or Head Coach, they will let the board know.  It IS an ownership voice in team affairs.   

That ownership voice in team affairs will be passed on to my descendants forever as stock can be inherited.  150 years from now a blood relative of mine will be voting on the direction of the Packers.  $250 for an eternal voice in Packers affairs is a bargain.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When it comes to time for a new stadium or stadium renovations, owners chip in money.  The Packers have 112,000 owners (before this sale).  The Packers do not have a multi-billionaire owner who can kick in piles of cash.  </p>
<p>The Packers are at an economic disadvantage compared to the rest of owners.   Packers fans know that this stock sale will help the team be competitive with the rest of the league in revenues.  Lambeau Field will now become an 80,000 capacity stadium in a city of 105,000.  </p>
<p>The team will never move, and never have a Snyder or  Glazer run the team into the ground.  Nor does any Packers fan have to be a yes man to a franchise king like Al Davis who never opened the books.   The books are open for the public to see where the dollars go. </p>
<p>The Packers owners vote for representatives on the board of directors to represent their wishes in how the team conducts business.  Should the stockholders want a new President, GM, or Head Coach, they will let the board know.  It IS an ownership voice in team affairs.   </p>
<p>That ownership voice in team affairs will be passed on to my descendants forever as stock can be inherited.  150 years from now a blood relative of mine will be voting on the direction of the Packers.  $250 for an eternal voice in Packers affairs is a bargain.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: teal379</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/12/06/packers-non-stock-stock-is-for-sale-for-only-the-fifth-time/#comment-1430494</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[teal379]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2011 22:05:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=171418#comment-1430494</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#039;s cheaper than the NFL Sunday Ticket and lasts a heck of a lot longer. 

Find it interesting that so many here complain about how Packer fans spend their money when they have a closet full of jerseys with some player&#039;s name on the back. 

Jets Favre, MN Moss, KC Montana, San Diego LT etc. - all pretty much useless due to the nature of the game. 

Hmm - I can spend 250 on a stock which allows me to vote for the guys running the show (board of directors - I do have friends on the board BTW) and I get to feel part of the team. Team expands etc or I can drop more money than that on some stupid jersey for a player that will more than likely leave the team due to FA.

Call Packer stock holders idiots if you want but they voted in the Board of Directors who set the tone for the team. We&#039;re winning and for the most part - people agree set up to continue to win the right way. Via the draft not FA (see the Eagles - no stock, owner blowing millions for that hot garbage)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s cheaper than the NFL Sunday Ticket and lasts a heck of a lot longer. </p>
<p>Find it interesting that so many here complain about how Packer fans spend their money when they have a closet full of jerseys with some player&#8217;s name on the back. </p>
<p>Jets Favre, MN Moss, KC Montana, San Diego LT etc. &#8211; all pretty much useless due to the nature of the game. </p>
<p>Hmm &#8211; I can spend 250 on a stock which allows me to vote for the guys running the show (board of directors &#8211; I do have friends on the board BTW) and I get to feel part of the team. Team expands etc or I can drop more money than that on some stupid jersey for a player that will more than likely leave the team due to FA.</p>
<p>Call Packer stock holders idiots if you want but they voted in the Board of Directors who set the tone for the team. We&#8217;re winning and for the most part &#8211; people agree set up to continue to win the right way. Via the draft not FA (see the Eagles &#8211; no stock, owner blowing millions for that hot garbage)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mr86ism</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/12/06/packers-non-stock-stock-is-for-sale-for-only-the-fifth-time/#comment-1430387</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[mr86ism]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2011 21:25:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=171418#comment-1430387</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So what do you do?
You watch football right?  Well I actually own the Green Bay Packers.
Really?!?!?!
Yea!  So what do you say we hop in my focus and hit the nearest super 8?
What????
Well I would bring you back yo my place but mom says I cant have guests after 9]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So what do you do?<br />
You watch football right?  Well I actually own the Green Bay Packers.<br />
Really?!?!?!<br />
Yea!  So what do you say we hop in my focus and hit the nearest super 8?<br />
What????<br />
Well I would bring you back yo my place but mom says I cant have guests after 9</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jrmbadger</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/12/06/packers-non-stock-stock-is-for-sale-for-only-the-fifth-time/#comment-1430257</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jrmbadger]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2011 20:49:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=171418#comment-1430257</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thumbs up if you are a proud new owner (or wish you could be one).  

Thumbs down if you are jealous.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thumbs up if you are a proud new owner (or wish you could be one).  </p>
<p>Thumbs down if you are jealous.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jrmbadger</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/12/06/packers-non-stock-stock-is-for-sale-for-only-the-fifth-time/#comment-1430235</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jrmbadger]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2011 20:44:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=171418#comment-1430235</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Update: Packers sold 28,000 shares in the first TWO PLUS HOURS.  That&#039;s 7 million dollars in two hours. 

Packer fans REALLY support their team.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Update: Packers sold 28,000 shares in the first TWO PLUS HOURS.  That&#8217;s 7 million dollars in two hours. </p>
<p>Packer fans REALLY support their team.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kadeeu</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/12/06/packers-non-stock-stock-is-for-sale-for-only-the-fifth-time/#comment-1430203</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[kadeeu]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2011 20:35:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=171418#comment-1430203</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What&#039;s really funny is that if this was a real stock sale then each share should be worth around $200 if the team could be sold for $1 billion.

So it would be a ripoff even if it was real stock! LOL!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What&#8217;s really funny is that if this was a real stock sale then each share should be worth around $200 if the team could be sold for $1 billion.</p>
<p>So it would be a ripoff even if it was real stock! LOL!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 31teamsarebetterthanthepackers</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/12/06/packers-non-stock-stock-is-for-sale-for-only-the-fifth-time/#comment-1430124</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[31teamsarebetterthanthepackers]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2011 20:03:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=171418#comment-1430124</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We all need to keep in mind that this franchise would not even be in Green Bay if it wasn&#039;t for the public ownership that was &quot;grandfathered&quot; in by the NFL years ago.  Otherwise, I am sure we would have been talking about the LA Packers at some point in the past.  The fans can say how great they and their franchise are, but just be proud you are not one of them.  In the end, who wants to be the butt of all NFL fan jokes?  Obviously, packer fans wear this title well.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We all need to keep in mind that this franchise would not even be in Green Bay if it wasn&#8217;t for the public ownership that was &#8220;grandfathered&#8221; in by the NFL years ago.  Otherwise, I am sure we would have been talking about the LA Packers at some point in the past.  The fans can say how great they and their franchise are, but just be proud you are not one of them.  In the end, who wants to be the butt of all NFL fan jokes?  Obviously, packer fans wear this title well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gb4mn0</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/12/06/packers-non-stock-stock-is-for-sale-for-only-the-fifth-time/#comment-1430070</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[gb4mn0]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2011 19:46:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=171418#comment-1430070</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[deconjonesbitchslap says: 
Dec 6, 2011 1:52 PM 
without question the biggest example of a franchise exploiting their obsessed, numb skulled fans. 
------------------------------------------
Once again a jealous twit that tees himself up to be ridiculed and made a fool of.
Who&#039;s more obsessed, a willing fan who spends $250 for the bragging rights to say they own a piece of their team or a season ticket holder that foolishly spends thousands of dollars yearly attending games of a team that in 51 years hasn&#039;t delivered and now unwittingly doing the bidding of a greedy owner who&#039;s attempting to get these same stooges to pay for a stadium that will only profit him?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>deconjonesbitchslap says:<br />
Dec 6, 2011 1:52 PM<br />
without question the biggest example of a franchise exploiting their obsessed, numb skulled fans.<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;<br />
Once again a jealous twit that tees himself up to be ridiculed and made a fool of.<br />
Who&#8217;s more obsessed, a willing fan who spends $250 for the bragging rights to say they own a piece of their team or a season ticket holder that foolishly spends thousands of dollars yearly attending games of a team that in 51 years hasn&#8217;t delivered and now unwittingly doing the bidding of a greedy owner who&#8217;s attempting to get these same stooges to pay for a stadium that will only profit him?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rao50858</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/12/06/packers-non-stock-stock-is-for-sale-for-only-the-fifth-time/#comment-1430057</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[rao50858]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2011 19:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=171418#comment-1430057</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I don&#039;t see the issue here.  The Packers are putting all of this money back into the stadium which they don&#039;t even own.  Lambeau Field is currently owned by the Brown County Stadium District.  This is not some greedy power play by some billionaire owner, but rather a contribution to Brown County and the city of Green Bay.  And it&#039;s a very cool piece of Packer memorabilia.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t see the issue here.  The Packers are putting all of this money back into the stadium which they don&#8217;t even own.  Lambeau Field is currently owned by the Brown County Stadium District.  This is not some greedy power play by some billionaire owner, but rather a contribution to Brown County and the city of Green Bay.  And it&#8217;s a very cool piece of Packer memorabilia.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: andygraham</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/12/06/packers-non-stock-stock-is-for-sale-for-only-the-fifth-time/#comment-1430055</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[andygraham]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2011 19:41:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=171418#comment-1430055</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I would gladly pay $250 not to have a Jerry Jones or a Daniel Snyder in charge of my favorite team.  With public ownership, that means Packers executives are also accountable to fans, not just profits.  Meanwhile Malcolm Glazer is stealing games away from fans by volunteering to send the Bucs to London every year just because it lines his pockets a little thicker and gets him in good with the ol&#039; Commish.  Yeah, that&#039;s a much better ownership option.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would gladly pay $250 not to have a Jerry Jones or a Daniel Snyder in charge of my favorite team.  With public ownership, that means Packers executives are also accountable to fans, not just profits.  Meanwhile Malcolm Glazer is stealing games away from fans by volunteering to send the Bucs to London every year just because it lines his pockets a little thicker and gets him in good with the ol&#8217; Commish.  Yeah, that&#8217;s a much better ownership option.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stellarperformance</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/12/06/packers-non-stock-stock-is-for-sale-for-only-the-fifth-time/#comment-1430053</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[stellarperformance]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2011 19:41:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=171418#comment-1430053</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[deconjonesbitchslap says: 
Dec 6, 2011 1:52 PM 
I’d rather have an 0-16 team that doesn’t take me for a fool than a 16-0 team that practically calls you a fool when they dangle out monopoly money to you and you go after it with a vengence.
--------------------------------------------------

Sure you would. Are you too dense to understand that Packer fans purchasing this stock know exactly what they are getting? It&#039;s a voluntary tax to help the team, and enables the owner (of the stock) to prove it. Not a single other franchise could do this...for two reasons; 1) they are the only publicly owned franchise, and 2) they have the most supportive fanbase in the league. 

The stock sold back in 1996 was selling for two and three times the face-value amongst collectors. This new issue will diminish that value, but so what? Wait another ten years for the next generation of fans and the value will be there again....not in a conventional stock manner-of-speaking, but an increased value just the same. 

This is Marketing Genius 101 my friend....nobody is getting the wool pulled over their eyes. And nobody cares what you think either, I might add.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>deconjonesbitchslap says:<br />
Dec 6, 2011 1:52 PM<br />
I’d rather have an 0-16 team that doesn’t take me for a fool than a 16-0 team that practically calls you a fool when they dangle out monopoly money to you and you go after it with a vengence.<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;</p>
<p>Sure you would. Are you too dense to understand that Packer fans purchasing this stock know exactly what they are getting? It&#8217;s a voluntary tax to help the team, and enables the owner (of the stock) to prove it. Not a single other franchise could do this&#8230;for two reasons; 1) they are the only publicly owned franchise, and 2) they have the most supportive fanbase in the league. </p>
<p>The stock sold back in 1996 was selling for two and three times the face-value amongst collectors. This new issue will diminish that value, but so what? Wait another ten years for the next generation of fans and the value will be there again&#8230;.not in a conventional stock manner-of-speaking, but an increased value just the same. </p>
<p>This is Marketing Genius 101 my friend&#8230;.nobody is getting the wool pulled over their eyes. And nobody cares what you think either, I might add.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: boycottfootball</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/12/06/packers-non-stock-stock-is-for-sale-for-only-the-fifth-time/#comment-1430045</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[boycottfootball]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2011 19:39:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=171418#comment-1430045</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For everyone saying that this is  WORTHLESS PIECE OF PAPER....

&lt;b&gt;USE YOUR BRAIN BEFORE YOU SPEAK&lt;/b&gt;

People go to an art store and pay hundreds if not thousands, NOT FOR original art but for PRINTS of something that is basically worthless.

Value is in the eye of the beholder.
You get to ... for free.. watch the Packers on sundays.
Doesnt cost you a dime.

People also buy $250 jerseys for players that get traded. 

&lt;b&gt;Its about supporting the team you LOVE!&lt;/b&gt;

Except its yours. Look around you. Value is in the eye of the beholder. 

&lt;b&gt;Dont hate just because you cant afford to buy one&lt;/b&gt;  
Im not even from the area, and if i had $275 to spend i would because football doesnt cost me a dime and gives me a lot more than that and Packers are probably the most respectable franchise ever.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For everyone saying that this is  WORTHLESS PIECE OF PAPER&#8230;.</p>
<p><b>USE YOUR BRAIN BEFORE YOU SPEAK</b></p>
<p>People go to an art store and pay hundreds if not thousands, NOT FOR original art but for PRINTS of something that is basically worthless.</p>
<p>Value is in the eye of the beholder.<br />
You get to &#8230; for free.. watch the Packers on sundays.<br />
Doesnt cost you a dime.</p>
<p>People also buy $250 jerseys for players that get traded. </p>
<p><b>Its about supporting the team you LOVE!</b></p>
<p>Except its yours. Look around you. Value is in the eye of the beholder. </p>
<p><b>Dont hate just because you cant afford to buy one</b><br />
Im not even from the area, and if i had $275 to spend i would because football doesnt cost me a dime and gives me a lot more than that and Packers are probably the most respectable franchise ever.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: packerstexansfan</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/12/06/packers-non-stock-stock-is-for-sale-for-only-the-fifth-time/#comment-1430037</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[packerstexansfan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2011 19:36:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=171418#comment-1430037</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@GrillChiller
Thanks for the clarification. I don&#039;t know the full ins and outs of it. Was just giving a general overview of why other teams can&#039;t have stock sales.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@GrillChiller<br />
Thanks for the clarification. I don&#8217;t know the full ins and outs of it. Was just giving a general overview of why other teams can&#8217;t have stock sales.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: brewdogg</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/12/06/packers-non-stock-stock-is-for-sale-for-only-the-fifth-time/#comment-1430035</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[brewdogg]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2011 19:36:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=171418#comment-1430035</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For those who don&#039;t pay attention, I have defended this &quot;stock&quot; on behalf of Packer fans in the past.  It&#039;s a neat, unique little piece of being a Packer fan, and it really shouldn&#039;t be mocked, although calling yourself an &quot;owner&quot; is a bit of a stretch.  Do you think everyone who has stock in McDonald&#039;s calls themselves owners?

However, there is a sub-set of Packer fans who are incredibly obnoxious and out of touch with reality.  It is to these undereducated and constantly intoxicated fools that I direct the following:

1)  The last stock sale was for the the 2003 renovation, and yielded little more than $20 million of the $295 million project.  (note: at $200/share, 1,475,000 shares would have needed to be sold to cover all costs.  Apparently there weren&#039;t 1,475,000 fans willing to give their money to the team...)  The majority of the financing came through a Brown county sales tax.  

2)  The current stock sale is for a few extra seats.  NFL owners regularly pay out of their own pocket for minor upgrades, especially ones that, if we assume that each seat is worth $100 per game, the proceeds will exceed the cost within 5 years.

3)  Given the facts, stating that all franchises should operate in this manner and not ask for public money to build new stadiums is completely asinine.  And ignorant of history, as well, since Lambeau Field was originally built because the NFL threatened to move the team to Milwaukee unless stadium conditions improved....

4)  There are conditions in the team charter that allow the team to be sold and moved.  Just saying....]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For those who don&#8217;t pay attention, I have defended this &#8220;stock&#8221; on behalf of Packer fans in the past.  It&#8217;s a neat, unique little piece of being a Packer fan, and it really shouldn&#8217;t be mocked, although calling yourself an &#8220;owner&#8221; is a bit of a stretch.  Do you think everyone who has stock in McDonald&#8217;s calls themselves owners?</p>
<p>However, there is a sub-set of Packer fans who are incredibly obnoxious and out of touch with reality.  It is to these undereducated and constantly intoxicated fools that I direct the following:</p>
<p>1)  The last stock sale was for the the 2003 renovation, and yielded little more than $20 million of the $295 million project.  (note: at $200/share, 1,475,000 shares would have needed to be sold to cover all costs.  Apparently there weren&#8217;t 1,475,000 fans willing to give their money to the team&#8230;)  The majority of the financing came through a Brown county sales tax.  </p>
<p>2)  The current stock sale is for a few extra seats.  NFL owners regularly pay out of their own pocket for minor upgrades, especially ones that, if we assume that each seat is worth $100 per game, the proceeds will exceed the cost within 5 years.</p>
<p>3)  Given the facts, stating that all franchises should operate in this manner and not ask for public money to build new stadiums is completely asinine.  And ignorant of history, as well, since Lambeau Field was originally built because the NFL threatened to move the team to Milwaukee unless stadium conditions improved&#8230;.</p>
<p>4)  There are conditions in the team charter that allow the team to be sold and moved.  Just saying&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GrillChiller</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/12/06/packers-non-stock-stock-is-for-sale-for-only-the-fifth-time/#comment-1430027</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[GrillChiller]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2011 19:34:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=171418#comment-1430027</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[gbpackersfan12...

Did I miss something? Or are you just claiming that those 6,000+ seats will be ready for next season?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>gbpackersfan12&#8230;</p>
<p>Did I miss something? Or are you just claiming that those 6,000+ seats will be ready for next season?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: boiler72</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/12/06/packers-non-stock-stock-is-for-sale-for-only-the-fifth-time/#comment-1430012</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[boiler72]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2011 19:28:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=171418#comment-1430012</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[46defense says: Dec 6, 2011 1:26 PM

Another reason to hate this awful franchise and abysmal “city”.

_________________________________

LOL, right.  Packers 21, Bears 14- hope you enjoyed that one.  Paclers 31, Steelers 25.  Let us know when your uh, &quot;big city&quot; Chicago goes from your 9 world titles, to the uh, &quot;little city&#039;s&quot; 13 world titles.  Good luck with that!  Go grow a mustache and put your moldy Ditka 1985 sweater vest on, loser.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>46defense says: Dec 6, 2011 1:26 PM</p>
<p>Another reason to hate this awful franchise and abysmal “city”.</p>
<p>_________________________________</p>
<p>LOL, right.  Packers 21, Bears 14- hope you enjoyed that one.  Paclers 31, Steelers 25.  Let us know when your uh, &#8220;big city&#8221; Chicago goes from your 9 world titles, to the uh, &#8220;little city&#8217;s&#8221; 13 world titles.  Good luck with that!  Go grow a mustache and put your moldy Ditka 1985 sweater vest on, loser.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: deconjonesbitchslap</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/12/06/packers-non-stock-stock-is-for-sale-for-only-the-fifth-time/#comment-1429897</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[deconjonesbitchslap]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2011 18:52:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=171418#comment-1429897</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[without question the biggest example of a franchise exploiting their obsessed, numb skulled fans. 

give us $250, and we&#039;ll let you shovel the stadium! score!  you have no say in any other part of the franchise whatsoever, but oh gosh, it&#039;s worth the &quot;investment.&quot;

how CUTE!

I&#039;d rather have an 0-16 team that doesn&#039;t take me for a fool than a 16-0 team that practically calls you a fool when they dangle out monopoly money to you and you go after it with a vengence.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>without question the biggest example of a franchise exploiting their obsessed, numb skulled fans. </p>
<p>give us $250, and we&#8217;ll let you shovel the stadium! score!  you have no say in any other part of the franchise whatsoever, but oh gosh, it&#8217;s worth the &#8220;investment.&#8221;</p>
<p>how CUTE!</p>
<p>I&#8217;d rather have an 0-16 team that doesn&#8217;t take me for a fool than a 16-0 team that practically calls you a fool when they dangle out monopoly money to you and you go after it with a vengence.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gbpackersfan12</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/12/06/packers-non-stock-stock-is-for-sale-for-only-the-fifth-time/#comment-1429880</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[gbpackersfan12]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2011 18:47:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=171418#comment-1429880</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is hard for fans of other NFL teams to understand, but let me help you out....

I&#039;ve been on the Packers season ticket waiting list for 27 years.  I&#039;m number 3,191 as of my last statement (yes, that is correct, almost 30 years to finally get my hands on the greatest NFL asset you could own, Packer season tickets).  

For $250, I can now assist in moving my name up the season ticket Holy Grail. 

Once the sale is complete, enough dedicated Packer Fans will have contributed their share to renovate Lambeau and add an additional 6,700 seats to the stadium.  

While some of you think it&#039;s for the piece of paper, or the &quot;ownership term&quot; all good reasons, open your eyes!  Lambeau is adding more seats baby!

This sale just scored me season tickets next year, and for $250 I&#039;m laughing all the way to the bank. 

I was in NYC for the Packer game over the weekend.  My ticket, Face Value, cost $284!!!  If the Giants can charge $284 for a ticket on the 10 yard line, then the Packers can sure as hell raise come capital for renovations.  Give me a break, $250 is pennies in NFL terms. 

Damn it feels good to be a Packer Fan today.  

Go Pack,]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is hard for fans of other NFL teams to understand, but let me help you out&#8230;.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve been on the Packers season ticket waiting list for 27 years.  I&#8217;m number 3,191 as of my last statement (yes, that is correct, almost 30 years to finally get my hands on the greatest NFL asset you could own, Packer season tickets).  </p>
<p>For $250, I can now assist in moving my name up the season ticket Holy Grail. </p>
<p>Once the sale is complete, enough dedicated Packer Fans will have contributed their share to renovate Lambeau and add an additional 6,700 seats to the stadium.  </p>
<p>While some of you think it&#8217;s for the piece of paper, or the &#8220;ownership term&#8221; all good reasons, open your eyes!  Lambeau is adding more seats baby!</p>
<p>This sale just scored me season tickets next year, and for $250 I&#8217;m laughing all the way to the bank. </p>
<p>I was in NYC for the Packer game over the weekend.  My ticket, Face Value, cost $284!!!  If the Giants can charge $284 for a ticket on the 10 yard line, then the Packers can sure as hell raise come capital for renovations.  Give me a break, $250 is pennies in NFL terms. </p>
<p>Damn it feels good to be a Packer Fan today.  </p>
<p>Go Pack,</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: blaz0037</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/12/06/packers-non-stock-stock-is-for-sale-for-only-the-fifth-time/#comment-1429874</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[blaz0037]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2011 18:46:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=171418#comment-1429874</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[oh geez, its simply a piece of paper.  and most will take the bait because their beloved Packers are playing so well.  I suppose Wisconsin is the perfect place when it comes to &quot;swaying the masses&quot;.

Go ahead sheep, buy your &quot;stock&quot;.  LOL.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>oh geez, its simply a piece of paper.  and most will take the bait because their beloved Packers are playing so well.  I suppose Wisconsin is the perfect place when it comes to &#8220;swaying the masses&#8221;.</p>
<p>Go ahead sheep, buy your &#8220;stock&#8221;.  LOL.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GrillChiller</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/12/06/packers-non-stock-stock-is-for-sale-for-only-the-fifth-time/#comment-1429872</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[GrillChiller]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2011 18:45:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=171418#comment-1429872</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Packerstexansfan...

Your statement of &quot;The shareholders vote in the president who oversees everything Packers&quot; is both true and false.  

They might &quot;oversee&quot; a lot of things but they have no power over Ted Thomson when it comes to football decisions.  Therefore, you&#039;re vote has no bearing on the product put out onto the field.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Packerstexansfan&#8230;</p>
<p>Your statement of &#8220;The shareholders vote in the president who oversees everything Packers&#8221; is both true and false.  </p>
<p>They might &#8220;oversee&#8221; a lot of things but they have no power over Ted Thomson when it comes to football decisions.  Therefore, you&#8217;re vote has no bearing on the product put out onto the field.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rooney24</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/12/06/packers-non-stock-stock-is-for-sale-for-only-the-fifth-time/#comment-1429855</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[rooney24]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2011 18:41:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=171418#comment-1429855</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I am a Viking fan, and don&#039;t really like the Packers, though I can respect that they are good right now.

With that said, I am still tempted to purchase a share.  If it weren&#039;t quite so expensive, I would.  Why?  Because I will never have the billions to actually buy a team, and the Pack are the only team that sells shares.

Why can&#039;t the NFL get smart and allow all teams to do this.  If they Vikings were selling shares, I would buy one.  So would many others, and they would have enough money to fund their own stadium.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am a Viking fan, and don&#8217;t really like the Packers, though I can respect that they are good right now.</p>
<p>With that said, I am still tempted to purchase a share.  If it weren&#8217;t quite so expensive, I would.  Why?  Because I will never have the billions to actually buy a team, and the Pack are the only team that sells shares.</p>
<p>Why can&#8217;t the NFL get smart and allow all teams to do this.  If they Vikings were selling shares, I would buy one.  So would many others, and they would have enough money to fund their own stadium.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ibleedgreenngold</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/12/06/packers-non-stock-stock-is-for-sale-for-only-the-fifth-time/#comment-1429833</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ibleedgreenngold]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2011 18:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=171418#comment-1429833</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Green Bay Packers is not “The only publicly-owned professional sports franchise”. The Saskatchewan Roughriders of the Canadian Football League (founded 1910) is also publicly owned.

//////////////////////////////////////////////////


Who?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Green Bay Packers is not “The only publicly-owned professional sports franchise”. The Saskatchewan Roughriders of the Canadian Football League (founded 1910) is also publicly owned.</p>
<p>//////////////////////////////////////////////////</p>
<p>Who?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: twesty85</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/12/06/packers-non-stock-stock-is-for-sale-for-only-the-fifth-time/#comment-1429823</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[twesty85]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2011 18:30:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=171418#comment-1429823</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[i would laugh if a vikings fan bought stock and showed up to the stockholders meeting in his #28 jersey.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i would laugh if a vikings fan bought stock and showed up to the stockholders meeting in his #28 jersey.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 46defense</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/12/06/packers-non-stock-stock-is-for-sale-for-only-the-fifth-time/#comment-1429811</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[46defense]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2011 18:26:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=171418#comment-1429811</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Another reason to hate this awful franchise and abysmal &quot;city&quot;.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another reason to hate this awful franchise and abysmal &#8220;city&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RexCanCoach</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/12/06/packers-non-stock-stock-is-for-sale-for-only-the-fifth-time/#comment-1429810</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[RexCanCoach]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2011 18:26:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=171418#comment-1429810</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@mortort

yes indeed, and I have spent 10x that amount already on poverty stricken kids in Africa since you&#039;re asking.  No I absolutely refuse to pay PSL for Jets seats for SAME REASON, why in the name of everything sacred would I or anyone else pay gazillionaire owners to build a stadium.  PSL is greatest sports ripoff in history so I gave up my tickets after 22 years.

wake up and use your hard earned money for something useful this Christmas.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@mortort</p>
<p>yes indeed, and I have spent 10x that amount already on poverty stricken kids in Africa since you&#8217;re asking.  No I absolutely refuse to pay PSL for Jets seats for SAME REASON, why in the name of everything sacred would I or anyone else pay gazillionaire owners to build a stadium.  PSL is greatest sports ripoff in history so I gave up my tickets after 22 years.</p>
<p>wake up and use your hard earned money for something useful this Christmas.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: packerstexansfan</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/12/06/packers-non-stock-stock-is-for-sale-for-only-the-fifth-time/#comment-1429789</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[packerstexansfan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2011 18:20:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=171418#comment-1429789</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[thejuddstir says: 
Dec 6, 2011 12:41 PM 

I have seen partial responses to my post but as of yet not one person has attempted to answer the main question…..”Why aren’t the other 31 NFL teams allowed to do the same?”

Because all the other teams are privately owned. i.e. Jerry Jones owns the Dallas Cowboys. The shareholders vote in the president (forgot the official title) who oversees everything Packers.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thejuddstir says:<br />
Dec 6, 2011 12:41 PM </p>
<p>I have seen partial responses to my post but as of yet not one person has attempted to answer the main question…..”Why aren’t the other 31 NFL teams allowed to do the same?”</p>
<p>Because all the other teams are privately owned. i.e. Jerry Jones owns the Dallas Cowboys. The shareholders vote in the president (forgot the official title) who oversees everything Packers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
