<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Week 13 power rankings</title>
	<atom:link href="http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/12/06/week-13-power-rankings-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/12/06/week-13-power-rankings-2/</link>
	<description>ProFootballTalk on NBCSports.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 04:55:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: texmexdeux</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/12/06/week-13-power-rankings-2/#comment-1433496</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[texmexdeux]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2011 04:56:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=171301#comment-1433496</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wow, 98 comments and no one&#039;s even mentioned the Jets.  I&#039;m kind of missing the hate.

Maybe we can trade for Tebow.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, 98 comments and no one&#8217;s even mentioned the Jets.  I&#8217;m kind of missing the hate.</p>
<p>Maybe we can trade for Tebow.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kennyrogerschicken</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/12/06/week-13-power-rankings-2/#comment-1433393</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[kennyrogerschicken]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2011 02:58:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=171301#comment-1433393</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[SOBEIT says: Dec 6, 2011 12:35 PM

fatdaddy73 says:
Dec 6, 2011 10:13 AM
@ jvibottomline, the Niners offense would need 6 weeks to score 45 points. =)
______

And our defense will allow less than 45. Which means we win. Apparently you forgot how games are won. That’s why our record is 10-2 and your teams record is worse. =)

------------------------------------------

The only undefeated team in the league through 13 weeks doesn&#039;t play defense. I&#039;m pretty sure outscoring your opponent is how games are won.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SOBEIT says: Dec 6, 2011 12:35 PM</p>
<p>fatdaddy73 says:<br />
Dec 6, 2011 10:13 AM<br />
@ jvibottomline, the Niners offense would need 6 weeks to score 45 points. =)<br />
______</p>
<p>And our defense will allow less than 45. Which means we win. Apparently you forgot how games are won. That’s why our record is 10-2 and your teams record is worse. =)</p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;</p>
<p>The only undefeated team in the league through 13 weeks doesn&#8217;t play defense. I&#8217;m pretty sure outscoring your opponent is how games are won.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rockstarzen</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/12/06/week-13-power-rankings-2/#comment-1433046</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[rockstarzen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Dec 2011 22:45:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=171301#comment-1433046</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@ critter69

That&#039;s pretty poor offensive production from a QB who was NEVER sacked. Baltimore&#039;s D played lights out, no doubt about that.

I hope we meet again in Feb. 49ers were arguably a chop-block away from winning this game.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ critter69</p>
<p>That&#8217;s pretty poor offensive production from a QB who was NEVER sacked. Baltimore&#8217;s D played lights out, no doubt about that.</p>
<p>I hope we meet again in Feb. 49ers were arguably a chop-block away from winning this game.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: critter69</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/12/06/week-13-power-rankings-2/#comment-1433008</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[critter69]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Dec 2011 22:16:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=171301#comment-1433008</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[49ers defense is that good?

Week 13, when the 49ers played the Ravens:

Ravens had 58 plays from scrimmage, and gained 253 yards (4.53 yards per play).
49ers had 54 plays from scrimmage, and gained 170 yards (3.15 yards per play).

Net rushing yards:
Ravens - 92
49ers - 74

Net Passing Yards:
Ravens - 161
49ers - 96

 Comp-Att-Int:
Ravens - 15-23-0
49ers - 15-24-1

Passing yards/attempt:
Ravens - 7.0
49ers - 2.9

Passing TDs:
Ravens - 1
49ers - 0

Yep.  49ers had a suffocating defense in that game.

We won&#039;t even discuss the 9 sacks the Ravens had on the 49ers QB, vs. the 0 the 49ers had on Flacco.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>49ers defense is that good?</p>
<p>Week 13, when the 49ers played the Ravens:</p>
<p>Ravens had 58 plays from scrimmage, and gained 253 yards (4.53 yards per play).<br />
49ers had 54 plays from scrimmage, and gained 170 yards (3.15 yards per play).</p>
<p>Net rushing yards:<br />
Ravens &#8211; 92<br />
49ers &#8211; 74</p>
<p>Net Passing Yards:<br />
Ravens &#8211; 161<br />
49ers &#8211; 96</p>
<p> Comp-Att-Int:<br />
Ravens &#8211; 15-23-0<br />
49ers &#8211; 15-24-1</p>
<p>Passing yards/attempt:<br />
Ravens &#8211; 7.0<br />
49ers &#8211; 2.9</p>
<p>Passing TDs:<br />
Ravens &#8211; 1<br />
49ers &#8211; 0</p>
<p>Yep.  49ers had a suffocating defense in that game.</p>
<p>We won&#8217;t even discuss the 9 sacks the Ravens had on the 49ers QB, vs. the 0 the 49ers had on Flacco.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cartwright24</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/12/06/week-13-power-rankings-2/#comment-1432503</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[cartwright24]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Dec 2011 18:54:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=171301#comment-1432503</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[pardon me.. not seahawks, SAINTs got whipped by a unhealthy RAMS...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>pardon me.. not seahawks, SAINTs got whipped by a unhealthy RAMS&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: johnnyblumpkin</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/12/06/week-13-power-rankings-2/#comment-1432003</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[johnnyblumpkin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Dec 2011 16:19:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=171301#comment-1432003</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m not sure that the 49&#039;er fans have much to bitch about. After looking at your schedule, I can only come up with three quality wins. Your wins over the Bengals, Lions and Giants are your only wins over teams with a .500 record or better. And these three teams may all be .500 by the end of the season. It will be interesting to see if they can get past the Steelers and the Seahawks in the coming weeks.
Believe me, the 49&#039;ers are having a great season and are playing above everyone&#039;s expectations but to have them ranked higher is silly. Winning the NFC West is like putting whipped cream on a dog turd.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not sure that the 49&#8242;er fans have much to bitch about. After looking at your schedule, I can only come up with three quality wins. Your wins over the Bengals, Lions and Giants are your only wins over teams with a .500 record or better. And these three teams may all be .500 by the end of the season. It will be interesting to see if they can get past the Steelers and the Seahawks in the coming weeks.<br />
Believe me, the 49&#8242;ers are having a great season and are playing above everyone&#8217;s expectations but to have them ranked higher is silly. Winning the NFC West is like putting whipped cream on a dog turd.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cartwright24</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/12/06/week-13-power-rankings-2/#comment-1431525</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[cartwright24]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Dec 2011 13:03:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=171301#comment-1431525</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wow..... that low scoring lost to Ravens super short week  and we had to travel, push Niners all the way to the Six spot... what kind of mess is this........]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow&#8230;.. that low scoring lost to Ravens super short week  and we had to travel, push Niners all the way to the Six spot&#8230; what kind of mess is this&#8230;&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: huejackson</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/12/06/week-13-power-rankings-2/#comment-1430746</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[huejackson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2011 23:01:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=171301#comment-1430746</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[All this Tebow hype will be over sunday (hopefully) when Broncos lose the next 4 games and Raiders win 3 out of 4 and win the west..]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All this Tebow hype will be over sunday (hopefully) when Broncos lose the next 4 games and Raiders win 3 out of 4 and win the west..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: boycottfootball</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/12/06/week-13-power-rankings-2/#comment-1430020</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[boycottfootball]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2011 19:32:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=171301#comment-1430020</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[lol, you got it done so fast because of the effort you put into it. haha  dert der der]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>lol, you got it done so fast because of the effort you put into it. haha  dert der der</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: scra22</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/12/06/week-13-power-rankings-2/#comment-1429884</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[scra22]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2011 18:48:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=171301#comment-1429884</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[49ers fans really need to calm down. The rankings are unfair but I&#039;m sure you&#039;ll still get in a decent bowl game.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>49ers fans really need to calm down. The rankings are unfair but I&#8217;m sure you&#8217;ll still get in a decent bowl game.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: apm</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/12/06/week-13-power-rankings-2/#comment-1429769</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[apm]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2011 18:14:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=171301#comment-1429769</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[God&#039;s going to strike you down for saying &quot;If the Broncos win the Super Bowl&quot; instead &quot;When the Broncos win the Super Bowl&quot;.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>God&#8217;s going to strike you down for saying &#8220;If the Broncos win the Super Bowl&#8221; instead &#8220;When the Broncos win the Super Bowl&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: johnnyshore</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/12/06/week-13-power-rankings-2/#comment-1429760</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[johnnyshore]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2011 18:09:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=171301#comment-1429760</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;The Packers are so good that they’d keep winning even if they rest their starters.&quot;

What a laughable statement.  Take away Rogers and the Packers are a mediocre offense with a terrible defense.  With Rogers, they are dominant, but the Giants probably would have won that game easily if Flynn were playing.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The Packers are so good that they’d keep winning even if they rest their starters.&#8221;</p>
<p>What a laughable statement.  Take away Rogers and the Packers are a mediocre offense with a terrible defense.  With Rogers, they are dominant, but the Giants probably would have won that game easily if Flynn were playing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: packerfanfordecades</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/12/06/week-13-power-rankings-2/#comment-1429730</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[packerfanfordecades]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2011 17:55:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=171301#comment-1429730</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hey ... I&#039;m a Packers fan ... but. 

It&#039;s still very hard to anticipate that they could move the ball down the field against the Giants from their own 20 into easy field goal range in only +/- 42 seconds and then have to huddle with the officials to run seconds off the clock before calling a time out. It&#039;s not because the Giants were shocked that Green Bay would be throwing long sideline pass patterns. 

Holy Cow!!

Makes me wonder how many points the Pack would score if they ran every possession that way. 

Praying that Desmond, Hawk and Charles Woodson heal up and we can find a way to put a stop to those +45 yard post pattern completions.  

.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey &#8230; I&#8217;m a Packers fan &#8230; but. </p>
<p>It&#8217;s still very hard to anticipate that they could move the ball down the field against the Giants from their own 20 into easy field goal range in only +/- 42 seconds and then have to huddle with the officials to run seconds off the clock before calling a time out. It&#8217;s not because the Giants were shocked that Green Bay would be throwing long sideline pass patterns. </p>
<p>Holy Cow!!</p>
<p>Makes me wonder how many points the Pack would score if they ran every possession that way. </p>
<p>Praying that Desmond, Hawk and Charles Woodson heal up and we can find a way to put a stop to those +45 yard post pattern completions.  </p>
<p>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: itscookeyo</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/12/06/week-13-power-rankings-2/#comment-1429707</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[itscookeyo]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2011 17:49:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=171301#comment-1429707</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@ jvibottomline, the Niners offense would need 6 weeks to score 45 points. =)

__

9ers hung 48 points on the Bucs.  How many points did the #5 Saints hang on the Bucs in two attempts?  47 total over 2 games.   How many wins did the #5 Saints have against the Rams?  0.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ jvibottomline, the Niners offense would need 6 weeks to score 45 points. =)</p>
<p>__</p>
<p>9ers hung 48 points on the Bucs.  How many points did the #5 Saints hang on the Bucs in two attempts?  47 total over 2 games.   How many wins did the #5 Saints have against the Rams?  0.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SOBEIT</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/12/06/week-13-power-rankings-2/#comment-1429657</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[SOBEIT]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2011 17:35:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=171301#comment-1429657</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[fatdaddy73 says: 
Dec 6, 2011 10:13 AM 
@ jvibottomline, the Niners offense would need 6 weeks to score 45 points. =)
______

And our defense will allow less than 45.  Which means we win.  Apparently you forgot how games are won.  That&#039;s why our record is 10-2 and your teams record is worse.  =)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>fatdaddy73 says:<br />
Dec 6, 2011 10:13 AM<br />
@ jvibottomline, the Niners offense would need 6 weeks to score 45 points. =)<br />
______</p>
<p>And our defense will allow less than 45.  Which means we win.  Apparently you forgot how games are won.  That&#8217;s why our record is 10-2 and your teams record is worse.  =)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Raider-in-PA</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/12/06/week-13-power-rankings-2/#comment-1429655</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Raider-in-PA]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2011 17:35:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=171301#comment-1429655</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dont worry, the Donkeys will NOT even get to the Superbowl, let alone win it!!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dont worry, the Donkeys will NOT even get to the Superbowl, let alone win it!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bozosforall</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/12/06/week-13-power-rankings-2/#comment-1429648</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[bozosforall]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2011 17:33:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=171301#comment-1429648</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[flash1283 says: 
Dec 6, 2011 11:03 AM 
bozosforall can be summed up in ONE word:

WINNER!!!!
__

Glad you finally get it, chump boy.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>flash1283 says:<br />
Dec 6, 2011 11:03 AM<br />
bozosforall can be summed up in ONE word:</p>
<p>WINNER!!!!<br />
__</p>
<p>Glad you finally get it, chump boy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rockstarzen</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/12/06/week-13-power-rankings-2/#comment-1429587</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[rockstarzen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2011 16:58:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=171301#comment-1429587</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[49ers fan here, and I agree with these rankings but Baltimore Fans need to come down to earth...Baltimore BARELY beat the 9ers at home with the 9ers coming off of a short week and travelling East so stop hating. 

If you&#039;re a Baltimore fan you need to be concerned about your offense, which is wildly inconsistent and struggles when Rice can&#039;t get going. If you&#039;re defense can&#039;t keep the game close you&#039;re in trouble - and every team at the top with you has a proven QB (except for the 49ers)

I&#039;d love to see a re-match between the 9ers and the Ravens in the Super Bowl. I don&#039;t think the Ravens could beat the 9ers again on a neutral field.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>49ers fan here, and I agree with these rankings but Baltimore Fans need to come down to earth&#8230;Baltimore BARELY beat the 9ers at home with the 9ers coming off of a short week and travelling East so stop hating. </p>
<p>If you&#8217;re a Baltimore fan you need to be concerned about your offense, which is wildly inconsistent and struggles when Rice can&#8217;t get going. If you&#8217;re defense can&#8217;t keep the game close you&#8217;re in trouble &#8211; and every team at the top with you has a proven QB (except for the 49ers)</p>
<p>I&#8217;d love to see a re-match between the 9ers and the Ravens in the Super Bowl. I don&#8217;t think the Ravens could beat the 9ers again on a neutral field.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gosuhgo</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/12/06/week-13-power-rankings-2/#comment-1429582</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[gosuhgo]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2011 16:56:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=171301#comment-1429582</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A loss to the Saints and Packers is worse than a blowout by the Dolphins and a battle with the Hanie-led Bears? Dallas ices their own kicker and isn&#039;t like...32? Come on...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A loss to the Saints and Packers is worse than a blowout by the Dolphins and a battle with the Hanie-led Bears? Dallas ices their own kicker and isn&#8217;t like&#8230;32? Come on&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wydok</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/12/06/week-13-power-rankings-2/#comment-1429567</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[wydok]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2011 16:48:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=171301#comment-1429567</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Eagles, Ravens, and Cowboys are all too high.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Eagles, Ravens, and Cowboys are all too high.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jsalis13</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/12/06/week-13-power-rankings-2/#comment-1429529</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jsalis13]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2011 16:33:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=171301#comment-1429529</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[kellyb9 says:
Dec 6, 2011 9:20 AM
@8man – Full disclosure, I am a Pats fan, but I think if they were playing any other team this week, the offense would’ve kept their foot on the gas. I saw no indication that the Colts were going to be able to stop them if they hadn’t trotted Brian Hoyer in there and ran the ball into the line 3 straight times. Also, I’d be concerned a bit of I were a Pitt or Baltimore fan that I wasn’t underestimating this team a bit. I’ll admit their defense has been far from stellar, but their offense has been much more potent in the past few weeks with the emergence of Gronkowski as a first option over Welker. Also Ben-Jarvis Green Ellis is back to 100%… I have some serious doubts that he was even at 60% when they played the Steelers.


_______________________________________


Pats lack the explosiveness on offense that Pittsburgh does, sure Gronkowski is good, and he presents major matchup issues, but the duo of Antonio Brown and Mike Wallace can beat you deep on every play. 

Besides even if the offenses are a push I&#039;d much rather see Flacco and the offense go up against the Patriots than the Steelers.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>kellyb9 says:<br />
Dec 6, 2011 9:20 AM<br />
@8man – Full disclosure, I am a Pats fan, but I think if they were playing any other team this week, the offense would’ve kept their foot on the gas. I saw no indication that the Colts were going to be able to stop them if they hadn’t trotted Brian Hoyer in there and ran the ball into the line 3 straight times. Also, I’d be concerned a bit of I were a Pitt or Baltimore fan that I wasn’t underestimating this team a bit. I’ll admit their defense has been far from stellar, but their offense has been much more potent in the past few weeks with the emergence of Gronkowski as a first option over Welker. Also Ben-Jarvis Green Ellis is back to 100%… I have some serious doubts that he was even at 60% when they played the Steelers.</p>
<p>_______________________________________</p>
<p>Pats lack the explosiveness on offense that Pittsburgh does, sure Gronkowski is good, and he presents major matchup issues, but the duo of Antonio Brown and Mike Wallace can beat you deep on every play. </p>
<p>Besides even if the offenses are a push I&#8217;d much rather see Flacco and the offense go up against the Patriots than the Steelers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: steelersownyou</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/12/06/week-13-power-rankings-2/#comment-1429522</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[steelersownyou]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2011 16:29:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=171301#comment-1429522</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[AFC is a 2 horse race! Period! Road to super bowl XLVI will either be Ravens or Steelers...They&#039;re the 2 most complete teams. Not only in the AFC, but in the entire NFL. Both have great defenses. Good offense. And good special teams! Look	forward to STEELERS VS RAVENS III.....GONNA BE A BLOOD BATH. HIDE THE WOMEN &amp; CHILDREN!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>AFC is a 2 horse race! Period! Road to super bowl XLVI will either be Ravens or Steelers&#8230;They&#8217;re the 2 most complete teams. Not only in the AFC, but in the entire NFL. Both have great defenses. Good offense. And good special teams! Look	forward to STEELERS VS RAVENS III&#8230;..GONNA BE A BLOOD BATH. HIDE THE WOMEN &amp; CHILDREN!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kevpft</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/12/06/week-13-power-rankings-2/#comment-1429507</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[kevpft]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2011 16:22:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=171301#comment-1429507</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well done on the Cowboys and Chiefs riffs! And painfully spot-on.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well done on the Cowboys and Chiefs riffs! And painfully spot-on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: truthserum4u</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/12/06/week-13-power-rankings-2/#comment-1429499</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[truthserum4u]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2011 16:18:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=171301#comment-1429499</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;8. Cowboys (No. 8; 7-5):  Maybe next week Jason Garrett will call for a punt block.  While his team is trying to punt.&quot;

Funny stuff Mike!


&quot;31. Rams (No. 31; 2-10):  Steve Spagnuolo wishes Zygi Wilf had bought the Rams instead of the Vikings.&quot;

Then he could re-hire Jay Zygmunt as the Rams President/GM.  Then you could have Zygi &amp; Zygmunt running the show!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;8. Cowboys (No. 8; 7-5):  Maybe next week Jason Garrett will call for a punt block.  While his team is trying to punt.&#8221;</p>
<p>Funny stuff Mike!</p>
<p>&#8220;31. Rams (No. 31; 2-10):  Steve Spagnuolo wishes Zygi Wilf had bought the Rams instead of the Vikings.&#8221;</p>
<p>Then he could re-hire Jay Zygmunt as the Rams President/GM.  Then you could have Zygi &amp; Zygmunt running the show!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: originalsteelcurtain</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/12/06/week-13-power-rankings-2/#comment-1429485</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[originalsteelcurtain]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2011 16:11:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=171301#comment-1429485</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Steelers beat the Ravens three times on their way to a SB...I&#039;m sure the Ravens would love to return the favor.

The Ravens D is slightly better that the Steeler D this year, although the Steelers O is better than the Raven O - especially at QB and WR.

Steelers will not be at all intimidated to play at BMore in the AFC Championship game.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steelers beat the Ravens three times on their way to a SB&#8230;I&#8217;m sure the Ravens would love to return the favor.</p>
<p>The Ravens D is slightly better that the Steeler D this year, although the Steelers O is better than the Raven O &#8211; especially at QB and WR.</p>
<p>Steelers will not be at all intimidated to play at BMore in the AFC Championship game.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: flash1283</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/12/06/week-13-power-rankings-2/#comment-1429457</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[flash1283]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2011 16:03:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=171301#comment-1429457</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[bozosforall can be summed up in ONE word:


LOSER!!!!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>bozosforall can be summed up in ONE word:</p>
<p>LOSER!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gtisme</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/12/06/week-13-power-rankings-2/#comment-1429438</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[gtisme]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2011 15:56:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=171301#comment-1429438</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[San Fran Guy saying the 9&#039;ers should be #2-Baltimore beat your A$$ and would do so again, you are not #2

Andre&#039;sJohnson and the guys saying &quot;whos # 1 seed now?&quot; Baltimore beat your a$$ with your starting qb and B&#039;more will be the #1 seed if they win out based on best conference record and head-to-head. 

New England guy- both games mentioned were at Gillette and the game you won was in 3 OT&#039;s . M&amp;T is a completely different set of circumstances.

Pittsburgh guy- thats just always a slugfest and you just never know, nothing to say to Pittsburgh guy.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>San Fran Guy saying the 9&#8242;ers should be #2-Baltimore beat your A$$ and would do so again, you are not #2</p>
<p>Andre&#8217;sJohnson and the guys saying &#8220;whos # 1 seed now?&#8221; Baltimore beat your a$$ with your starting qb and B&#8217;more will be the #1 seed if they win out based on best conference record and head-to-head. </p>
<p>New England guy- both games mentioned were at Gillette and the game you won was in 3 OT&#8217;s . M&amp;T is a completely different set of circumstances.</p>
<p>Pittsburgh guy- thats just always a slugfest and you just never know, nothing to say to Pittsburgh guy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: scra22</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/12/06/week-13-power-rankings-2/#comment-1429389</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[scra22]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2011 15:43:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=171301#comment-1429389</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[maxl49 says: 
Dec 6, 2011 9:37 AM 
I like how loosing against the Ravens has dropped the 49ers but loosing against the Rams is ok for the Saints …
====

Losing to the Rams did drop the Saints. I believe they fell several spots to #9 after that loss. They have worked their way back up by winning 4 games in a row, three against teams contending for a playoff spot.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>maxl49 says:<br />
Dec 6, 2011 9:37 AM<br />
I like how loosing against the Ravens has dropped the 49ers but loosing against the Rams is ok for the Saints …<br />
====</p>
<p>Losing to the Rams did drop the Saints. I believe they fell several spots to #9 after that loss. They have worked their way back up by winning 4 games in a row, three against teams contending for a playoff spot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: franknunley57</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/12/06/week-13-power-rankings-2/#comment-1429369</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[franknunley57]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2011 15:38:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=171301#comment-1429369</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@mr. wright212:
 
The Giants have lost 4 games in a row! It&#039;s the second half of the season...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@mr. wright212:</p>
<p>The Giants have lost 4 games in a row! It&#8217;s the second half of the season&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: visible4</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/12/06/week-13-power-rankings-2/#comment-1429357</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[visible4]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2011 15:34:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=171301#comment-1429357</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Lions played the Saints without Suh, Houston, and Delmas. They lost Fairley after the 1st quarter (which he dominated - 3 tackles, 1sack). They lost Kevin Smith who was averaging 5ypc in the game. And not to mention the refs did not call the offsides and let the Saints block a field goal, a Saint throws a full blown PUNCH at the Lions- no call, late hit on Stafford - No Call - Facemask on Maurice Morris - No Call. But they sure did not miss the OFFENSIVE pass interference which wiped out over 100 yards of offense.  I would say considering all that, the Lions should move UP in the Power Rankings. If they play like that the rest of the year they will easily beat the Vikings, Chargers and Raiders and go 10-6.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Lions played the Saints without Suh, Houston, and Delmas. They lost Fairley after the 1st quarter (which he dominated &#8211; 3 tackles, 1sack). They lost Kevin Smith who was averaging 5ypc in the game. And not to mention the refs did not call the offsides and let the Saints block a field goal, a Saint throws a full blown PUNCH at the Lions- no call, late hit on Stafford &#8211; No Call &#8211; Facemask on Maurice Morris &#8211; No Call. But they sure did not miss the OFFENSIVE pass interference which wiped out over 100 yards of offense.  I would say considering all that, the Lions should move UP in the Power Rankings. If they play like that the rest of the year they will easily beat the Vikings, Chargers and Raiders and go 10-6.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
