you probably should provide evidence for your negative assertions of Tebow. I never saw or heard anything that Tebow demanded the team to change the offense or that Tebow demanded to be interviewed. From what I heard, it was John Fox’s idea to change the offense. And since Tebow has a great public following, its the media that more than likely asks Tebow to do interviews. Its awfully stupid when people have to invent things so that they can feel justified to hate someone.

Pretty sure the title was a slight on Tebow, and pretty sure this whole article is.

I always love that about Timmy – come over here and let me tell the camera how humble I am. Isn’t that an oxymoron?

Glad Skelton is playing pretty well now, because he’s looked awful at times.

=====================

No worries, WE PUNKED Kolb’s old team in Oaktown, anyway…with JaMarcus Russell starting at QB and 7 QB sacks on McNabb.

Who would you rather have in the Super Bowl for your team: Trent Dilfer or Dan Marino?

I rest my case.
——————————————————–
Depends, Do I get the Ravens Defense with Dilfer if I pick him?

If the media was tripping over themselves trying to bash Skelton, saying things like “Kolb gives the Cardinals the best chance to win,” and “It’s embarrassing to think the Cardinals could win with Skelton!” then you might actually have a point.

Since that obviously isn’t the case, you have no point. It’s okay to admit you were wrong.

Who would you rather have in the Super Bowl for your team: Trent Dilfer or Dan Marino?

I rest my case.

Tebow just sets up game winning field goals with overall crappy QB play!!!

CARDINALS, GET RID OF KEVIN KOLB!!!! Stephen A. Smith was correct about him!!!! His name should be Kevin “Corn on the” Kolb!!!!

More John Skelton!!!! More John Skelton!!!!

It’s also a smaller sample size.

“Measuring a quarterback by wins is overrated.”

It’s only overrated if you use an extremely small sample size, like say, 5 games.

I see what you’re doing here, Gregg. You’re saying “Look at Skelton: wins don’t mean your quarterback is good.” And I agree. And obviously, you’re drawing parallels to Tebow, probably because you’re as sick as most of us hearing how Tebow single-handedly drove his team to victory every time they win, even when he does nothing but throw a pick when it counts the most. But you’re focusing on the wrong details.

A bad quarterback can be masked by good players around him. A good quarterback can be held back by his team or even his coaching staff. Whatever the case, for those of us who evaluate the players by watching them every Sunday, it takes more than a few games of a single season to get an idea of how good a quarterback really is.

Other than Marion Barber stupidly going out of bounds, Tebow loses yesterday.

Other than Ponder throwing an INT last week, Tebow loses that game.

Other than the Dolphins turning the ball over in OT, Tebow loses that game.

If you are too dense to realize that this article was really about the absurdity of calling Tebow a great QB by pointing out Skelton’s luck, I don’t know what to tell you.

And I gotta say, Skelton almost gives me a heart attack every game (except loss to SF), but at least he and the rest of the team pull through and get wins.

I do care about how many wins the QB has. >.<

Something Kolb cannot comprehend doing.

No reasonable person thinks Smith is great or even good QB. But if wins are all that matters, Smith is way better than Tebow.

(As a 49er fan, I am fully aware that the odds of us ever winning a Super Bowl with Smith are extremely low. But I also don’t think Harbaugh is planning on making Smith the franchise guy.)

Skelton has actually faced tougher teams and come out on top. I’m not taking anything away from Tebow, but it just shows how messed up the media is.