<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Rodgers tops Brees easily, Megatron and Allen lead All-Pro voting</title>
	<atom:link href="http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/01/06/rodgers-tops-brees-easily-megatron-and-allen-lead-all-pro-voting/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/01/06/rodgers-tops-brees-easily-megatron-and-allen-lead-all-pro-voting/</link>
	<description>ProFootballTalk on NBCSports.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 03:56:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: bozorocks</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/01/06/rodgers-tops-brees-easily-megatron-and-allen-lead-all-pro-voting/#comment-1509261</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[bozorocks]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2012 00:31:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=177937#comment-1509261</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@ the complte and total moron that wrote this.
A whole bunch of fat, smelly Wisconsins are doing the discount double check right about now.
 
Half a minute out of their day when they aren’t picking their noses, farting, or trying desperately to get drunk on sewer-water beer.


 I am so sorry your envy has got you down and out. I am sure there are many fat people where you live too. I bet most of them stink worse then you. The last time I picked my nose, I flung it out across the room to a pile of garbage where I saw you were eating from. When I last farted, you came out. And boy oh boy, that last beer I drank was awesome. Go Packers !]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ the complte and total moron that wrote this.<br />
A whole bunch of fat, smelly Wisconsins are doing the discount double check right about now.</p>
<p>Half a minute out of their day when they aren’t picking their noses, farting, or trying desperately to get drunk on sewer-water beer.</p>
<p> I am so sorry your envy has got you down and out. I am sure there are many fat people where you live too. I bet most of them stink worse then you. The last time I picked my nose, I flung it out across the room to a pile of garbage where I saw you were eating from. When I last farted, you came out. And boy oh boy, that last beer I drank was awesome. Go Packers !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ghiaguy67</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/01/06/rodgers-tops-brees-easily-megatron-and-allen-lead-all-pro-voting/#comment-1504309</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ghiaguy67]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2012 06:03:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=177937#comment-1504309</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think most people on here have the wrong definition of what a MVP is, to me it means without that player on their team that team basically stinks. That MVP is a crucial part to the teams success, how about a great example of this: LOOK AT THE COLTS WITHOUT PERENNIAL MVP Manning?????? They stink without Manning, let me see Rodgers sat out a game and his back-up has the best day of any Packer QB ever, hmmm makes me wonder if that means that in reality the Packers would do just as good without Rodgers at the helm. MVP is not about stats, it is about the catalyst that player brings to his team.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think most people on here have the wrong definition of what a MVP is, to me it means without that player on their team that team basically stinks. That MVP is a crucial part to the teams success, how about a great example of this: LOOK AT THE COLTS WITHOUT PERENNIAL MVP Manning?????? They stink without Manning, let me see Rodgers sat out a game and his back-up has the best day of any Packer QB ever, hmmm makes me wonder if that means that in reality the Packers would do just as good without Rodgers at the helm. MVP is not about stats, it is about the catalyst that player brings to his team.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: truthserum4u</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/01/06/rodgers-tops-brees-easily-megatron-and-allen-lead-all-pro-voting/#comment-1501736</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[truthserum4u]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2012 04:51:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=177937#comment-1501736</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@ smedley61

I know reading comprehension isn&#039;t a strength of Packer fans, but try to stay with me here smedley.

beedubyatoo started by attacking another city, as is common amongst Packer fans, and then started in with the championships.  Again this is common with Packers fans; big talk about championships &amp; trophies (which it&#039;s okay to be proud, just not to act lik a jerk, which too many do).  So if you&#039;re going to start comparing cities and talking championships, then let&#039;s talk championships smedley.  Of course Packer fans don&#039;t want to go there because they don&#039;t have anything more than football, so you smedley want to limit it to the NFL.  Sorry, but if you&#039;re going to talk about cities then you have to talk about championships in all sports.  And there smedley, you&#039;re city&#039;s trophy case would fill about a third of New York&#039;s, like it or not.  

I&#039;m also quite sure you don&#039;t even realize that the New York Yankees actually played professional football.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ smedley61</p>
<p>I know reading comprehension isn&#8217;t a strength of Packer fans, but try to stay with me here smedley.</p>
<p>beedubyatoo started by attacking another city, as is common amongst Packer fans, and then started in with the championships.  Again this is common with Packers fans; big talk about championships &amp; trophies (which it&#8217;s okay to be proud, just not to act lik a jerk, which too many do).  So if you&#8217;re going to start comparing cities and talking championships, then let&#8217;s talk championships smedley.  Of course Packer fans don&#8217;t want to go there because they don&#8217;t have anything more than football, so you smedley want to limit it to the NFL.  Sorry, but if you&#8217;re going to talk about cities then you have to talk about championships in all sports.  And there smedley, you&#8217;re city&#8217;s trophy case would fill about a third of New York&#8217;s, like it or not.  </p>
<p>I&#8217;m also quite sure you don&#8217;t even realize that the New York Yankees actually played professional football.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: golonger</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/01/06/rodgers-tops-brees-easily-megatron-and-allen-lead-all-pro-voting/#comment-1499844</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[golonger]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2012 17:42:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=177937#comment-1499844</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I certainly hope you tools in here remember this indoor/outdoor comparison next time a Manning vs. Brady argument arises!  LOL]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I certainly hope you tools in here remember this indoor/outdoor comparison next time a Manning vs. Brady argument arises!  LOL</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bears5683</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/01/06/rodgers-tops-brees-easily-megatron-and-allen-lead-all-pro-voting/#comment-1495899</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[bears5683]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jan 2012 15:03:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=177937#comment-1495899</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;Here come the NOLA fans who think Brees walks on water. Rodgers had BETTER STATS.

Rodgers had NO bad games.

10/16 – Brees 29/45 383 yds 1 TD; 3 INT as you lose to the 4-12 Bucs

10/30 – Brees 30/44 269 yrd 1 TD; 2 INT as you lose to the 2- 14 Rams.

Rodgers didn’t have ANY bad games. Rodgers led his team to the top seed. Brees laid in egg against two crap teams and as a result, earned his team playing time this weekend.

His coach’s desire to keep throwing into the record books does not an MVP make. Nor does a long standing record that three guys came close to. And a fourth would have hit if he were played like Brees.

If Rodgers threw as much as Brees, he’d have over 6,000 yds.&quot;

I&#039;m a Bree&#039;s fan and Roger&#039;s Hater, but you make a good argument. Either way I vote for Bree&#039;s because I&#039;m biased. As a matter of fact I&#039;ll vote Brady 2nd. I hate Rogers.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Here come the NOLA fans who think Brees walks on water. Rodgers had BETTER STATS.</p>
<p>Rodgers had NO bad games.</p>
<p>10/16 – Brees 29/45 383 yds 1 TD; 3 INT as you lose to the 4-12 Bucs</p>
<p>10/30 – Brees 30/44 269 yrd 1 TD; 2 INT as you lose to the 2- 14 Rams.</p>
<p>Rodgers didn’t have ANY bad games. Rodgers led his team to the top seed. Brees laid in egg against two crap teams and as a result, earned his team playing time this weekend.</p>
<p>His coach’s desire to keep throwing into the record books does not an MVP make. Nor does a long standing record that three guys came close to. And a fourth would have hit if he were played like Brees.</p>
<p>If Rodgers threw as much as Brees, he’d have over 6,000 yds.&#8221;</p>
<p>I&#8217;m a Bree&#8217;s fan and Roger&#8217;s Hater, but you make a good argument. Either way I vote for Bree&#8217;s because I&#8217;m biased. As a matter of fact I&#8217;ll vote Brady 2nd. I hate Rogers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mushroomcloudlayin</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/01/06/rodgers-tops-brees-easily-megatron-and-allen-lead-all-pro-voting/#comment-1495166</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[mushroomcloudlayin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jan 2012 00:57:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=177937#comment-1495166</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[To clarify, Brees holds the advantage in completion percentage, but the other meaningful ratios (like Passer Rating and YPA - which as any gambler knows are the best indicating statistics of victory in the NFL) go to Rodgers, as well as TD:Att, TD:INT and INT:Att.

Again, Brees is an amazing player who had an amazing year, but I think Aaron Rodgers was just a bit better.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To clarify, Brees holds the advantage in completion percentage, but the other meaningful ratios (like Passer Rating and YPA &#8211; which as any gambler knows are the best indicating statistics of victory in the NFL) go to Rodgers, as well as TD:Att, TD:INT and INT:Att.</p>
<p>Again, Brees is an amazing player who had an amazing year, but I think Aaron Rodgers was just a bit better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mushroomcloudlayin</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/01/06/rodgers-tops-brees-easily-megatron-and-allen-lead-all-pro-voting/#comment-1495156</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[mushroomcloudlayin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jan 2012 00:50:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=177937#comment-1495156</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[sxt004 says: Jan 6, 2012 5:36 PM

@ mushroomcloudlayin…

Dude seriously. Drew Brees was the most efficient QB in the league and broke his own record. Another idiot on these boards i see. So he was the most efficient as well as the most yards. Aaron Rodgers passer rating was higher…get it straight guy.

Second off everyone says ow brees threw it more that’s how he got the obvious yards. Well wouldn’t throwing it more mean you’re more prone to having less efficiency. I mean if you miss 2 or 3 passes out of 10 your numbers will be worse that if you miss 2 or 3 out of 100. But again, you educated fellas on here have it all figured out though. We unedumacated southerners in Louisiana just chase alligators around and scream choot em whilst also walking around barefoot and robbing people?

________________

Dude, seriously.  Ratios and Passer Rating are indications of efficiency per throw - in which Rodgers has better numbers than Brees.  V

I&#039;m not trying to cheapen Brees&#039; accomplishments, but to me it&#039;s second best this season.

I have absolutely nothing against Drew Brees, the Saints or anyone from Louisiana - Nawlins is probably my favorite American city to visit.  Nor do I think Saints fans are idiots, just passionate homers like ALL THE REST OF US.

Still, you should make sure your premises make logical sense before you call someone else an idiot.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>sxt004 says: Jan 6, 2012 5:36 PM</p>
<p>@ mushroomcloudlayin…</p>
<p>Dude seriously. Drew Brees was the most efficient QB in the league and broke his own record. Another idiot on these boards i see. So he was the most efficient as well as the most yards. Aaron Rodgers passer rating was higher…get it straight guy.</p>
<p>Second off everyone says ow brees threw it more that’s how he got the obvious yards. Well wouldn’t throwing it more mean you’re more prone to having less efficiency. I mean if you miss 2 or 3 passes out of 10 your numbers will be worse that if you miss 2 or 3 out of 100. But again, you educated fellas on here have it all figured out though. We unedumacated southerners in Louisiana just chase alligators around and scream choot em whilst also walking around barefoot and robbing people?</p>
<p>________________</p>
<p>Dude, seriously.  Ratios and Passer Rating are indications of efficiency per throw &#8211; in which Rodgers has better numbers than Brees.  V</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not trying to cheapen Brees&#8217; accomplishments, but to me it&#8217;s second best this season.</p>
<p>I have absolutely nothing against Drew Brees, the Saints or anyone from Louisiana &#8211; Nawlins is probably my favorite American city to visit.  Nor do I think Saints fans are idiots, just passionate homers like ALL THE REST OF US.</p>
<p>Still, you should make sure your premises make logical sense before you call someone else an idiot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jeff33u</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/01/06/rodgers-tops-brees-easily-megatron-and-allen-lead-all-pro-voting/#comment-1495059</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jeff33u]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jan 2012 23:30:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=177937#comment-1495059</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Darren Sproles 2011

86 catches, 710 yards, 8.3  yards per reception, 8.4 YAC average

The statistics cited for him are correct. He almost ALWAYS receives the ball behind the line of scrimmage.  That is the only possible way to have more YAC than yards, which he does.  Source: http://sports.yahoo.com/nfl/players/7306.  

For his CAREER, he averages 9.1 yards per reception (which means he averaged more in SD than NO), and for his CAREER, he averages 9.6 YAC average.  

Again, to those who just refuse to believe facts - look them up before spouting out assanine views that aren&#039;t grounded in reality.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Darren Sproles 2011</p>
<p>86 catches, 710 yards, 8.3  yards per reception, 8.4 YAC average</p>
<p>The statistics cited for him are correct. He almost ALWAYS receives the ball behind the line of scrimmage.  That is the only possible way to have more YAC than yards, which he does.  Source: <a href="http://sports.yahoo.com/nfl/players/7306" rel="nofollow">http://sports.yahoo.com/nfl/players/7306</a>.  </p>
<p>For his CAREER, he averages 9.1 yards per reception (which means he averaged more in SD than NO), and for his CAREER, he averages 9.6 YAC average.  </p>
<p>Again, to those who just refuse to believe facts &#8211; look them up before spouting out assanine views that aren&#8217;t grounded in reality.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: smedley61</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/01/06/rodgers-tops-brees-easily-megatron-and-allen-lead-all-pro-voting/#comment-1494102</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[smedley61]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jan 2012 15:46:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=177937#comment-1494102</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You really don’t want to start getting into a championship counting contest with a New Yorker. The Packers don’t even make it half way to the Yankees’ total. 
__________________________________
I must have missed something. What years did the Yankees win the NFL Championship?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You really don’t want to start getting into a championship counting contest with a New Yorker. The Packers don’t even make it half way to the Yankees’ total.<br />
__________________________________<br />
I must have missed something. What years did the Yankees win the NFL Championship?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 20bust11</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/01/06/rodgers-tops-brees-easily-megatron-and-allen-lead-all-pro-voting/#comment-1493979</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[20bust11]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jan 2012 14:07:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=177937#comment-1493979</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[rysol says: 
Jan 6, 2012 2:21 PM 
Here come the NOLA fans who think Brees walks on water. Rodgers had BETTER STATS. 

Rodgers had NO bad games.

10/16 – Brees 29/45 383 yds 1 TD; 3 INT as you lose to the 4-12 Bucs

10/30 – Brees 30/44 269 yrd 1 TD; 2 INT as you lose to the 2- 14 Rams.

Rodgers didn’t have ANY bad games. Rodgers led his team to the top seed. Brees laid in egg against two crap teams and as a result, earned his team playing time this weekend.

His coach’s desire to keep throwing into the record books does not an MVP make. Nor does a long standing record that three guys came close to. And a fourth would have hit if he were played like Brees. 

If Rodgers threw as much as Brees, he’d have over 6,000 yds.



Any bad games. I guess KC doesn&#039;t count. Rodgers was horrific in that game. 

Brees set more records in 1 game (Not game 16), than Rodgers will have in his career. 
MVP is a joke!
NFL magazine had it right. Manning deserved it more Cheap Double Hack.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>rysol says:<br />
Jan 6, 2012 2:21 PM<br />
Here come the NOLA fans who think Brees walks on water. Rodgers had BETTER STATS. </p>
<p>Rodgers had NO bad games.</p>
<p>10/16 – Brees 29/45 383 yds 1 TD; 3 INT as you lose to the 4-12 Bucs</p>
<p>10/30 – Brees 30/44 269 yrd 1 TD; 2 INT as you lose to the 2- 14 Rams.</p>
<p>Rodgers didn’t have ANY bad games. Rodgers led his team to the top seed. Brees laid in egg against two crap teams and as a result, earned his team playing time this weekend.</p>
<p>His coach’s desire to keep throwing into the record books does not an MVP make. Nor does a long standing record that three guys came close to. And a fourth would have hit if he were played like Brees. </p>
<p>If Rodgers threw as much as Brees, he’d have over 6,000 yds.</p>
<p>Any bad games. I guess KC doesn&#8217;t count. Rodgers was horrific in that game. </p>
<p>Brees set more records in 1 game (Not game 16), than Rodgers will have in his career.<br />
MVP is a joke!<br />
NFL magazine had it right. Manning deserved it more Cheap Double Hack.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: truthserum4u</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/01/06/rodgers-tops-brees-easily-megatron-and-allen-lead-all-pro-voting/#comment-1493883</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[truthserum4u]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jan 2012 10:59:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=177937#comment-1493883</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Sproles 707 YAC stat HAS to be wrong.  He has a TOTAL of 710 receiving yards on the year.  

Since YAC means yards after the catch, it would mean out of the 86 receptions Sproles had, Brees threw the ball a total of only three yards in the air.  That would be a lot of swing &amp; screen passes that he&#039;s catching before the line of scrimmage.  But since I&#039;ve seen him catch at least one pass inwhich the ball was over three yards in the air, this YAC stat can&#039;t be accurate.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Sproles 707 YAC stat HAS to be wrong.  He has a TOTAL of 710 receiving yards on the year.  </p>
<p>Since YAC means yards after the catch, it would mean out of the 86 receptions Sproles had, Brees threw the ball a total of only three yards in the air.  That would be a lot of swing &amp; screen passes that he&#8217;s catching before the line of scrimmage.  But since I&#8217;ve seen him catch at least one pass inwhich the ball was over three yards in the air, this YAC stat can&#8217;t be accurate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: truthserum4u</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/01/06/rodgers-tops-brees-easily-megatron-and-allen-lead-all-pro-voting/#comment-1493877</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[truthserum4u]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jan 2012 10:40:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=177937#comment-1493877</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[beedubyatoo says:Jan 6, 2012 3:37 PM 

rexismybff says:
 Jan 6, 2012 2:18 PM
 A whole bunch of fat, smelly Wisconsins are doing the discount double check right about now.
 
Half a minute out of their day when they aren’t picking their noses, farting, or trying desperately to get drunk on sewer-water beer.
 
————————
 
From your screen name, I’m assuming that you live in the New York area or are a Jets fan. I can say this with 100% certainty. I’ve been to New York and I’ve been to Green Bay. Green Bay is better. At least it’s an American city with clean streets, good schools, real patriotic Americans and the best football fans. 

Oh, and did I mention that the Packers have 12 more NFL championships than the Jets?

XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

You really don&#039;t want to start getting into a championship counting contest with a New Yorker.  The Packers don&#039;t even make it half way to the Yankees&#039; total.  And that doesn&#039;t include the Mets, the Jets, the Giants, the Islanders, the Rangers &amp; Knicks.  

I guess Green Bay isn&#039;t Title Town after all.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>beedubyatoo says:Jan 6, 2012 3:37 PM </p>
<p>rexismybff says:<br />
 Jan 6, 2012 2:18 PM<br />
 A whole bunch of fat, smelly Wisconsins are doing the discount double check right about now.</p>
<p>Half a minute out of their day when they aren’t picking their noses, farting, or trying desperately to get drunk on sewer-water beer.</p>
<p>————————</p>
<p>From your screen name, I’m assuming that you live in the New York area or are a Jets fan. I can say this with 100% certainty. I’ve been to New York and I’ve been to Green Bay. Green Bay is better. At least it’s an American city with clean streets, good schools, real patriotic Americans and the best football fans. </p>
<p>Oh, and did I mention that the Packers have 12 more NFL championships than the Jets?</p>
<p>XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX</p>
<p>You really don&#8217;t want to start getting into a championship counting contest with a New Yorker.  The Packers don&#8217;t even make it half way to the Yankees&#8217; total.  And that doesn&#8217;t include the Mets, the Jets, the Giants, the Islanders, the Rangers &amp; Knicks.  </p>
<p>I guess Green Bay isn&#8217;t Title Town after all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: truthserum4u</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/01/06/rodgers-tops-brees-easily-megatron-and-allen-lead-all-pro-voting/#comment-1493869</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[truthserum4u]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jan 2012 09:58:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=177937#comment-1493869</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[kennyrogerschicken says:Jan 6, 2012 3:24 PM 

 And Fran has zero championships. Great comparison, son, maybe you should take your own advice.

----------------------------

What does that have to do with someone being better at QB (or any position for that matter) than another?

You Packer fans crack me up.  That&#039;s your answer to everything - &quot;championships!&quot;  As if that&#039;s what determines if a player is great or not.  

But you guys go on supporting each other even when one of you makes an embarrassing statement like the one saying your back-up QB, starting all of two games, is better than three Hall Of Famers, three Super Bowl winners and anthor four that started @ QB in the SB.  Not to mention another handful of highly accomplished QBs.  

It&#039;s sad really...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>kennyrogerschicken says:Jan 6, 2012 3:24 PM </p>
<p> And Fran has zero championships. Great comparison, son, maybe you should take your own advice.</p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-</p>
<p>What does that have to do with someone being better at QB (or any position for that matter) than another?</p>
<p>You Packer fans crack me up.  That&#8217;s your answer to everything &#8211; &#8220;championships!&#8221;  As if that&#8217;s what determines if a player is great or not.  </p>
<p>But you guys go on supporting each other even when one of you makes an embarrassing statement like the one saying your back-up QB, starting all of two games, is better than three Hall Of Famers, three Super Bowl winners and anthor four that started @ QB in the SB.  Not to mention another handful of highly accomplished QBs.  </p>
<p>It&#8217;s sad really&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stevenfbrackett</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/01/06/rodgers-tops-brees-easily-megatron-and-allen-lead-all-pro-voting/#comment-1493815</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[stevenfbrackett]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jan 2012 06:19:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=177937#comment-1493815</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It is funny how people say Matt Flynn love is based solely on two starts.  No, it is also based on all the times he played in preseason and in relief of Rodgers in the 3rd &amp; 4th quarters.  He had some rough, even ugly spots in the beginning, as any rookie backup would, but has improved steadily to the point where he is now consistently good when put in, though not to the freakish degree of last week.

Wherever he goes, I have every confidence that he will adapt to the new system and do just fine.  He won&#039;t put up last week&#039;s numbers regularly - that was a once in a lifetime game - but he&#039;ll be solid.  Not so confident in the third string QB, he hasn&#039;t been very good thus far.  But hopefully they can develop him as well as they developed the last two backups.

Another snub:  Mason Crosby for kicker.  He&#039;s been very dependable and broken several franchise records this year - most of them his own.  Can&#039;t he even get a couple of votes?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is funny how people say Matt Flynn love is based solely on two starts.  No, it is also based on all the times he played in preseason and in relief of Rodgers in the 3rd &amp; 4th quarters.  He had some rough, even ugly spots in the beginning, as any rookie backup would, but has improved steadily to the point where he is now consistently good when put in, though not to the freakish degree of last week.</p>
<p>Wherever he goes, I have every confidence that he will adapt to the new system and do just fine.  He won&#8217;t put up last week&#8217;s numbers regularly &#8211; that was a once in a lifetime game &#8211; but he&#8217;ll be solid.  Not so confident in the third string QB, he hasn&#8217;t been very good thus far.  But hopefully they can develop him as well as they developed the last two backups.</p>
<p>Another snub:  Mason Crosby for kicker.  He&#8217;s been very dependable and broken several franchise records this year &#8211; most of them his own.  Can&#8217;t he even get a couple of votes?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: smedley61</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/01/06/rodgers-tops-brees-easily-megatron-and-allen-lead-all-pro-voting/#comment-1493621</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[smedley61]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jan 2012 03:11:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=177937#comment-1493621</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[rexismybff says:
Jan 6, 2012 2:18 PM
A whole bunch of fat, smelly Wisconsins are doing the discount double check right about now.

Half a minute out of their day when they aren’t picking their noses, farting, or trying desperately to get drunk on sewer-water beer.
________________________________________________________________

Sounds like you&#039;ve got issues that go well beyond a football board.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>rexismybff says:<br />
Jan 6, 2012 2:18 PM<br />
A whole bunch of fat, smelly Wisconsins are doing the discount double check right about now.</p>
<p>Half a minute out of their day when they aren’t picking their noses, farting, or trying desperately to get drunk on sewer-water beer.<br />
________________________________________________________________</p>
<p>Sounds like you&#8217;ve got issues that go well beyond a football board.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tokyosandblaster</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/01/06/rodgers-tops-brees-easily-megatron-and-allen-lead-all-pro-voting/#comment-1493571</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[tokyosandblaster]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jan 2012 02:26:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=177937#comment-1493571</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Interesting.

Some dude says that it isn&#039;t a runaway race for Rodgers, and yet he received 48.5 votes out of 50 possible.

Clearly people who know a lot more about the ins and outs of football think Rodgers is better than Brees.

Perhaps that should tell you something.

Perhaps your opinion is rather stupid.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting.</p>
<p>Some dude says that it isn&#8217;t a runaway race for Rodgers, and yet he received 48.5 votes out of 50 possible.</p>
<p>Clearly people who know a lot more about the ins and outs of football think Rodgers is better than Brees.</p>
<p>Perhaps that should tell you something.</p>
<p>Perhaps your opinion is rather stupid.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: killface4prez</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/01/06/rodgers-tops-brees-easily-megatron-and-allen-lead-all-pro-voting/#comment-1493565</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[killface4prez]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jan 2012 02:22:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=177937#comment-1493565</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[xismybff says:
Jan 6, 2012 2:18 PM
A whole bunch of fat, smelly Wisconsins are doing the discount double check right about now.

Half a minute out of their day when they aren’t picking their noses, farting, or trying desperately to get drunk on sewer-water beer.

--------------------------------------------

I am not fat, and I don&#039;t like Miller beer.  Other than that...sounds about right.  

As far as your &quot;smelly&quot; charge - I assume you are from New Orleans, the whole downtown of which is essentially one huge open sewer?  Hi there, kettle, have you met pot?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>xismybff says:<br />
Jan 6, 2012 2:18 PM<br />
A whole bunch of fat, smelly Wisconsins are doing the discount double check right about now.</p>
<p>Half a minute out of their day when they aren’t picking their noses, farting, or trying desperately to get drunk on sewer-water beer.</p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;</p>
<p>I am not fat, and I don&#8217;t like Miller beer.  Other than that&#8230;sounds about right.  </p>
<p>As far as your &#8220;smelly&#8221; charge &#8211; I assume you are from New Orleans, the whole downtown of which is essentially one huge open sewer?  Hi there, kettle, have you met pot?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: goldrush36</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/01/06/rodgers-tops-brees-easily-megatron-and-allen-lead-all-pro-voting/#comment-1493552</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[goldrush36]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jan 2012 02:03:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=177937#comment-1493552</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[deepseabreeze says: Jan 6, 2012 2:17 PM

janikowski and lechler were shafted. they are both respectively the best at their positions. the niners winning this year is the only reason akers and lee were first team all pro over them

______________________________________________

True Raider moron homerism at it&#039;s finest. Yeah let&#039;s  just toss out the facts like Akers and Lee both broke all time NFL records this year and were statistically superior. Here&#039;s your sign genius]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>deepseabreeze says: Jan 6, 2012 2:17 PM</p>
<p>janikowski and lechler were shafted. they are both respectively the best at their positions. the niners winning this year is the only reason akers and lee were first team all pro over them</p>
<p>______________________________________________</p>
<p>True Raider moron homerism at it&#8217;s finest. Yeah let&#8217;s  just toss out the facts like Akers and Lee both broke all time NFL records this year and were statistically superior. Here&#8217;s your sign genius</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: autumnwind999</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/01/06/rodgers-tops-brees-easily-megatron-and-allen-lead-all-pro-voting/#comment-1493530</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[autumnwind999]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jan 2012 01:36:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=177937#comment-1493530</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[franktherat96 says:Jan 6, 2012 5:28 PM 

Rodgers loss to the chiefs….pretty bad team in an of itself. if the rolls were reversed packers fans you would be saying the same things us Saints fans are. I have news for you though, you guys aren’t making it back to the super bowl again this year. I wouldn’t be shocked if you lose in the divisional round

--------------------------------------------------

The Chiefs were 7-9, didn&#039;t the Saints give the Rams one of their 2 wins this season? And the Bucs one of their 4 wins?

Come on , now.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>franktherat96 says:Jan 6, 2012 5:28 PM </p>
<p>Rodgers loss to the chiefs….pretty bad team in an of itself. if the rolls were reversed packers fans you would be saying the same things us Saints fans are. I have news for you though, you guys aren’t making it back to the super bowl again this year. I wouldn’t be shocked if you lose in the divisional round</p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;</p>
<p>The Chiefs were 7-9, didn&#8217;t the Saints give the Rams one of their 2 wins this season? And the Bucs one of their 4 wins?</p>
<p>Come on , now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 122u</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/01/06/rodgers-tops-brees-easily-megatron-and-allen-lead-all-pro-voting/#comment-1493522</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[122u]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jan 2012 01:25:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=177937#comment-1493522</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[virger says: 
Jan 6, 2012 2:16 PM 
Brees&gt;Rodgers


Let&#039;s see, I&#039;m trying to figure out this symbol stuff. I&#039;ll give it a try :)
Flynn&gt;Brees=Over-rated+dumb=loser]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>virger says:<br />
Jan 6, 2012 2:16 PM<br />
Brees&gt;Rodgers</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s see, I&#8217;m trying to figure out this symbol stuff. I&#8217;ll give it a try <img src='http://s0.wp.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
Flynn&gt;Brees=Over-rated+dumb=loser</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: noladat</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/01/06/rodgers-tops-brees-easily-megatron-and-allen-lead-all-pro-voting/#comment-1493519</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[noladat]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jan 2012 01:19:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=177937#comment-1493519</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I love that fumbles must not count Rodgers 4 Brees 3 and taking a dozen more sacks must be a good thing!

Nobody bring it up?

Why?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love that fumbles must not count Rodgers 4 Brees 3 and taking a dozen more sacks must be a good thing!</p>
<p>Nobody bring it up?</p>
<p>Why?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: packersweep</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/01/06/rodgers-tops-brees-easily-megatron-and-allen-lead-all-pro-voting/#comment-1493517</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[packersweep]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jan 2012 01:18:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=177937#comment-1493517</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[rajuncajun28 says: 
Jan 6, 2012 4:27 PM 


Brees will easily get the SB MVP this year. Fact.

--------------------------------------------------

Only if Rodgers loans it to him. Seriously, if Brees were to win SB MVP he wouldn`t get the car because Payton would probably take it to bed-like he did with the SB trophy.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>rajuncajun28 says:<br />
Jan 6, 2012 4:27 PM </p>
<p>Brees will easily get the SB MVP this year. Fact.</p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;</p>
<p>Only if Rodgers loans it to him. Seriously, if Brees were to win SB MVP he wouldn`t get the car because Payton would probably take it to bed-like he did with the SB trophy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jeff33u</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/01/06/rodgers-tops-brees-easily-megatron-and-allen-lead-all-pro-voting/#comment-1493515</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jeff33u]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jan 2012 01:16:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=177937#comment-1493515</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Brees also looked awesome in the playoff game against Seattle last year.  He has lost 4 out of 9 road games since the 2010 playoffs. 5-4 doesn&#039;t look so good, so you decide to live in the past to bolster your claim - even though this thread is about the 2011 All-Pro team.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brees also looked awesome in the playoff game against Seattle last year.  He has lost 4 out of 9 road games since the 2010 playoffs. 5-4 doesn&#8217;t look so good, so you decide to live in the past to bolster your claim &#8211; even though this thread is about the 2011 All-Pro team.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: marcinhouston</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/01/06/rodgers-tops-brees-easily-megatron-and-allen-lead-all-pro-voting/#comment-1493513</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[marcinhouston]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jan 2012 01:16:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=177937#comment-1493513</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Curtis Painter also threw for 6 TDs in relief of Peyton Manning this season, but that was over the course of 9 games, with basically the same weapons Peyton had last year, so I think you have to look at Flynn&#039;s performance and cast some doubt on Rodgers as a system QB. It&#039;s pretty hard to argue that the most valuable player is a player whose replacement performs as well as him in the only game you have to go by, and who gives his team the kind of threat at his position that they only had for 15 or 20 years before he got there. Sure, Rodgers beat Brees head to head, but he did that at home, with a few random plays like a receiver fumble and a kick return TD being key, and in a game in which Charles Woodson threw a punch but was neither penalized nor ejected for it and was allowed to continue contributing in the game, and then the game came down to the final play. If you compare Aaron Rodgers and Adrian Foster, they actually have a lot in common, both had some very big games, and both also saw their backups produce similar games when they got the start. The difference is that Rodgers and the team around him stayed healthy, so Rodgers gets the MVP for being healthy when he is clearly in just as much of a system situation as Foster.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Curtis Painter also threw for 6 TDs in relief of Peyton Manning this season, but that was over the course of 9 games, with basically the same weapons Peyton had last year, so I think you have to look at Flynn&#8217;s performance and cast some doubt on Rodgers as a system QB. It&#8217;s pretty hard to argue that the most valuable player is a player whose replacement performs as well as him in the only game you have to go by, and who gives his team the kind of threat at his position that they only had for 15 or 20 years before he got there. Sure, Rodgers beat Brees head to head, but he did that at home, with a few random plays like a receiver fumble and a kick return TD being key, and in a game in which Charles Woodson threw a punch but was neither penalized nor ejected for it and was allowed to continue contributing in the game, and then the game came down to the final play. If you compare Aaron Rodgers and Adrian Foster, they actually have a lot in common, both had some very big games, and both also saw their backups produce similar games when they got the start. The difference is that Rodgers and the team around him stayed healthy, so Rodgers gets the MVP for being healthy when he is clearly in just as much of a system situation as Foster.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: binarybulge</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/01/06/rodgers-tops-brees-easily-megatron-and-allen-lead-all-pro-voting/#comment-1493509</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[binarybulge]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jan 2012 01:12:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=177937#comment-1493509</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[jeff33u says:
Jan 6, 2012 8:04 PM
Also, while the W-L record might be decent on the road for Brees, despite the fact that he looked terrible and had awful games against two of the worst teams in the NFL who had their coaches fired, his splits show he is FAR inferior statistically on the road. That is just the facts. His rating is about 110 at home, and in the 90′s on the road. Rodgers is the reverse – merely the best in NFL history at home while a world beater who never throws picks on the road.

---

What are you talking about?  Brees is 122.4 at home, 100.7 on the road.  A 100.7 career passer rating would put you second in NFL history.  Heck, even 90 on the road would be considered elite.  Maybe we&#039;re getting spoiled here, but don&#039;t start thinking 100 is garbage.

You&#039;re right in that Brees is much better at home, but we&#039;re talking hall-of-fame level at home vs elite level on the road.  Nit-picking.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>jeff33u says:<br />
Jan 6, 2012 8:04 PM<br />
Also, while the W-L record might be decent on the road for Brees, despite the fact that he looked terrible and had awful games against two of the worst teams in the NFL who had their coaches fired, his splits show he is FAR inferior statistically on the road. That is just the facts. His rating is about 110 at home, and in the 90′s on the road. Rodgers is the reverse – merely the best in NFL history at home while a world beater who never throws picks on the road.</p>
<p>&#8212;</p>
<p>What are you talking about?  Brees is 122.4 at home, 100.7 on the road.  A 100.7 career passer rating would put you second in NFL history.  Heck, even 90 on the road would be considered elite.  Maybe we&#8217;re getting spoiled here, but don&#8217;t start thinking 100 is garbage.</p>
<p>You&#8217;re right in that Brees is much better at home, but we&#8217;re talking hall-of-fame level at home vs elite level on the road.  Nit-picking.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mistersmith22</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/01/06/rodgers-tops-brees-easily-megatron-and-allen-lead-all-pro-voting/#comment-1493508</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[mistersmith22]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jan 2012 01:12:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=177937#comment-1493508</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[deepseabreeze says:
Jan 6, 2012 3:14 PM
mistersmith22 says:
Jan 6, 2012 3:05 PM
deepseabreeze: This year Lee broke Lechler’s record for highest punt-yard-average in a season. So as good as Lechler is, you can’t say he’s the best at his position…looking at the stats, Andy Lee just had the best punting season EVER.

no he didn’t. check the stats bud. lechler averaged 51.1 yards per punt in 2009. lechler still holds the record

---------------

That&#039;s the stat for just plain kicking the ball -- that just means Lechler kicks it farther than anyone else. Lee set the record for Net Average, which means field position. MUCH more meaningful stat. It&#039;s efficiency and quality of work.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>deepseabreeze says:<br />
Jan 6, 2012 3:14 PM<br />
mistersmith22 says:<br />
Jan 6, 2012 3:05 PM<br />
deepseabreeze: This year Lee broke Lechler’s record for highest punt-yard-average in a season. So as good as Lechler is, you can’t say he’s the best at his position…looking at the stats, Andy Lee just had the best punting season EVER.</p>
<p>no he didn’t. check the stats bud. lechler averaged 51.1 yards per punt in 2009. lechler still holds the record</p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;</p>
<p>That&#8217;s the stat for just plain kicking the ball &#8212; that just means Lechler kicks it farther than anyone else. Lee set the record for Net Average, which means field position. MUCH more meaningful stat. It&#8217;s efficiency and quality of work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jeff33u</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/01/06/rodgers-tops-brees-easily-megatron-and-allen-lead-all-pro-voting/#comment-1493501</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jeff33u]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jan 2012 01:04:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=177937#comment-1493501</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Also, while the W-L record might be decent on the road for Brees, despite the fact that he looked terrible and had awful games against two of the worst teams in the NFL who had their coaches fired, his splits show he is FAR inferior statistically on the road.  That is just the facts. His rating is about 110 at home, and in the 90&#039;s on the road.  Rodgers is the reverse - merely the best in NFL history at home while a world beater who never throws picks on the road.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also, while the W-L record might be decent on the road for Brees, despite the fact that he looked terrible and had awful games against two of the worst teams in the NFL who had their coaches fired, his splits show he is FAR inferior statistically on the road.  That is just the facts. His rating is about 110 at home, and in the 90&#8242;s on the road.  Rodgers is the reverse &#8211; merely the best in NFL history at home while a world beater who never throws picks on the road.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jeff33u</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/01/06/rodgers-tops-brees-easily-megatron-and-allen-lead-all-pro-voting/#comment-1493500</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jeff33u]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jan 2012 01:00:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=177937#comment-1493500</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[jeff33u @
 
Drew Brees is a COMPLETELY different (and worse) QB outdoors (and the same is true even in domes on the road).
 ————————————————–
 
i Know since 2009 Drew is 18-6 on the road…It only leads the NFL with the best road record since 2009….just awful. Rodgers is the best QB to EVER play the NFL…LMFAO,Rodgers is a great QB,an IMO So is Brees
-------------------------------------------

We&#039;re talking this year, not 2009.  But you are right, his numbers @STL and @TB (two juggernaut teams if I ever saw one) were OUTSTANDING....I give up, you are the swami of football.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>jeff33u @</p>
<p>Drew Brees is a COMPLETELY different (and worse) QB outdoors (and the same is true even in domes on the road).<br />
 ————————————————–</p>
<p>i Know since 2009 Drew is 18-6 on the road…It only leads the NFL with the best road record since 2009….just awful. Rodgers is the best QB to EVER play the NFL…LMFAO,Rodgers is a great QB,an IMO So is Brees<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-</p>
<p>We&#8217;re talking this year, not 2009.  But you are right, his numbers @STL and @TB (two juggernaut teams if I ever saw one) were OUTSTANDING&#8230;.I give up, you are the swami of football.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: binarybulge</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/01/06/rodgers-tops-brees-easily-megatron-and-allen-lead-all-pro-voting/#comment-1493488</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[binarybulge]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jan 2012 00:48:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=177937#comment-1493488</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[doubleogator says:
Jan 6, 2012 7:15 PM
So what if Brees threw to Sproles a lot, the plays work, and I do believe they are trying to win a football game, I doubt that most of you Brees bashers have seen enough of him to see the TD’s that go for 25 plus yards too. We did win a super bowl with him two years ago, and if you look at the stats for the two playoff games, and the super bowl in 09, you’ll see he didn’t throw one interception in any of those games and threw 7 td’s The same people saying that Brees was celebrating are probably the ones who loved B Favre when he was in G.B. (he was humble, right?) I said it earlier, I bet there are 29 other teams out there who wished they had Brees for a QB

---

The argument deals with how Sproles affects Brees&#039; stats.  I agree that those plays work well and the Saints should use them all day long, but if you&#039;re arguing that Brees should get credit for Sproles breaking screen passes, then you&#039;re clearly a homer.  Honestly, screen passes should be counted as running plays (or at least the ones that have the QB throwing backwards to the back).  I have no idea why they&#039;re not.  I&#039;ve always questioned that.

BTW, I&#039;m a die-hard Pack fan, and hated Favre as soon as he started with the retirement games.  Honestly, he came across as humble for a long long time.  As soon as he left and tried to come back, throwing management under the bus, it was all Rodgers for me.  He had his issues back in the day, but if someone wanted to get on his case about his Vicodin addiction, that was on them.  Personally, I&#039;m not an angel, so that wasn&#039;t my place.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>doubleogator says:<br />
Jan 6, 2012 7:15 PM<br />
So what if Brees threw to Sproles a lot, the plays work, and I do believe they are trying to win a football game, I doubt that most of you Brees bashers have seen enough of him to see the TD’s that go for 25 plus yards too. We did win a super bowl with him two years ago, and if you look at the stats for the two playoff games, and the super bowl in 09, you’ll see he didn’t throw one interception in any of those games and threw 7 td’s The same people saying that Brees was celebrating are probably the ones who loved B Favre when he was in G.B. (he was humble, right?) I said it earlier, I bet there are 29 other teams out there who wished they had Brees for a QB</p>
<p>&#8212;</p>
<p>The argument deals with how Sproles affects Brees&#8217; stats.  I agree that those plays work well and the Saints should use them all day long, but if you&#8217;re arguing that Brees should get credit for Sproles breaking screen passes, then you&#8217;re clearly a homer.  Honestly, screen passes should be counted as running plays (or at least the ones that have the QB throwing backwards to the back).  I have no idea why they&#8217;re not.  I&#8217;ve always questioned that.</p>
<p>BTW, I&#8217;m a die-hard Pack fan, and hated Favre as soon as he started with the retirement games.  Honestly, he came across as humble for a long long time.  As soon as he left and tried to come back, throwing management under the bus, it was all Rodgers for me.  He had his issues back in the day, but if someone wanted to get on his case about his Vicodin addiction, that was on them.  Personally, I&#8217;m not an angel, so that wasn&#8217;t my place.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: saints25</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/01/06/rodgers-tops-brees-easily-megatron-and-allen-lead-all-pro-voting/#comment-1493479</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[saints25]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jan 2012 00:38:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=177937#comment-1493479</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[jeff33u @

 Drew Brees is a COMPLETELY different (and worse) QB outdoors (and the same is true even in domes on the road). 
--------------------------------------------------

i Know since 2009 Drew is 18-6 on the road...It only leads the NFL with the best road record since 2009....just awful. Rodgers is the best QB to EVER play the NFL...LMFAO,Rodgers is a great QB,an IMO So is Brees]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>jeff33u @</p>
<p> Drew Brees is a COMPLETELY different (and worse) QB outdoors (and the same is true even in domes on the road).<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;</p>
<p>i Know since 2009 Drew is 18-6 on the road&#8230;It only leads the NFL with the best road record since 2009&#8230;.just awful. Rodgers is the best QB to EVER play the NFL&#8230;LMFAO,Rodgers is a great QB,an IMO So is Brees</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
