<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: League admits errors on Lions-Saints fumble</title>
	<atom:link href="http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/01/08/league-admits-errors-on-lions-saints-fumble/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/01/08/league-admits-errors-on-lions-saints-fumble/</link>
	<description>ProFootballTalk on NBCSports.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 18:30:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: dscol715</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/01/08/league-admits-errors-on-lions-saints-fumble/#comment-1501313</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[dscol715]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2012 00:33:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=178382#comment-1501313</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@danthman42

Don&#039;t get caught up in the individual circumstances.  Just think of it as once a whistle is blown the play is over.  If not then you would have people fighting over the ball after every play.  In the Steelers game the incomplete pass could not be recovered by Denver because the once it hit the ground the ref blew it dead before the recovery.  Thats why refs are taught that if they aren&#039;t sure they should hold their whistle and let things play out so they can sort it out later.  That was the mistake made in the Denver game.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@danthman42</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t get caught up in the individual circumstances.  Just think of it as once a whistle is blown the play is over.  If not then you would have people fighting over the ball after every play.  In the Steelers game the incomplete pass could not be recovered by Denver because the once it hit the ground the ref blew it dead before the recovery.  Thats why refs are taught that if they aren&#8217;t sure they should hold their whistle and let things play out so they can sort it out later.  That was the mistake made in the Denver game.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: danthman42</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/01/08/league-admits-errors-on-lions-saints-fumble/#comment-1500697</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[danthman42]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2012 21:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=178382#comment-1500697</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[whoever made these replay rules needs to have his head examined. here&#039;s what i&#039;ve gathered in the last two days, for those of you scoring at home: on a ball that travels forward, if the initial ruling is incomplete and the whistle blows, the opposing team can be awarded the ball, provided that a fumble and recovery are identifiable on replay (cutler rule); if the initial ruling is a fumble but one ref blows an &quot;inadvertent&quot; whistle, possession can NOT change hands; and if the ball travels backwards and is ruled incomplete, possession can not change hands. PFT, can you please either correct me have someone on earth give a rational explanation for how the rules were created this way.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>whoever made these replay rules needs to have his head examined. here&#8217;s what i&#8217;ve gathered in the last two days, for those of you scoring at home: on a ball that travels forward, if the initial ruling is incomplete and the whistle blows, the opposing team can be awarded the ball, provided that a fumble and recovery are identifiable on replay (cutler rule); if the initial ruling is a fumble but one ref blows an &#8220;inadvertent&#8221; whistle, possession can NOT change hands; and if the ball travels backwards and is ruled incomplete, possession can not change hands. PFT, can you please either correct me have someone on earth give a rational explanation for how the rules were created this way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: drpompanoduke</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/01/08/league-admits-errors-on-lions-saints-fumble/#comment-1500621</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[drpompanoduke]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2012 21:17:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=178382#comment-1500621</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Was a terrible call.   Refs were terrible all weekend.  The more football I watch on HD TV the more I realize that NFL officials on the whole suck.   Tebow had his face mask grabbed, clearly evident to everyone except the 63 year old official watching the play.    The league needs full time officials period.   And if u can&#039;t run a 100 yards faster in less then 25 seconds, retire .]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Was a terrible call.   Refs were terrible all weekend.  The more football I watch on HD TV the more I realize that NFL officials on the whole suck.   Tebow had his face mask grabbed, clearly evident to everyone except the 63 year old official watching the play.    The league needs full time officials period.   And if u can&#8217;t run a 100 yards faster in less then 25 seconds, retire .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: leofan1234</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/01/08/league-admits-errors-on-lions-saints-fumble/#comment-1500591</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[leofan1234]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2012 21:09:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=178382#comment-1500591</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[banjostang says: 
The Lions played very well for three quarters in a tough place to play. It might have been a different outcome if the Lions were able to do something with the two recovered fumbles. When the Saints defense made the stops and takeaways, they kept scoring. That’s how you win in the playoffs.

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Thank you. I think that is what most of us fans want to hear. 

We were the bottom feeders and laughing stock of the NFL for so long and still feel like we don&#039;t get respect.  Which, is probably why many of the fans complain about officiating. It just seems like we are on the short end of the stick most games.

Saints are a good team and deserved to win that game. No doubt about it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>banjostang says:<br />
The Lions played very well for three quarters in a tough place to play. It might have been a different outcome if the Lions were able to do something with the two recovered fumbles. When the Saints defense made the stops and takeaways, they kept scoring. That’s how you win in the playoffs.</p>
<p>+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++<br />
Thank you. I think that is what most of us fans want to hear. </p>
<p>We were the bottom feeders and laughing stock of the NFL for so long and still feel like we don&#8217;t get respect.  Which, is probably why many of the fans complain about officiating. It just seems like we are on the short end of the stick most games.</p>
<p>Saints are a good team and deserved to win that game. No doubt about it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: banjostang</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/01/08/league-admits-errors-on-lions-saints-fumble/#comment-1500501</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[banjostang]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2012 20:48:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=178382#comment-1500501</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How about we just go to the highlight reel and review the two plays in question:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hf8q7mc4_gQ
watch the highlights.

at 2:48 shows all the saints (and some Lions) clearly standing around because the play was called dead.

at 2:52 when your guy picked up the ball - Robert Meachem (Saints fastest receiver) was only 2 yards from him.  He was walking slowly back since the play had been whistled dead.  He would have been running and even closer to your guy if there was no whistle.  Lions still recover, but no TD.

Same highlight reel:

Go to 5:11 you can see that even after Brees pulled the ball back to his body that it was still forward of the down marker -  he was pushed back by the pile.

As for the last 38 seconds.... Don&#039;t know the exact rule. Some say that the play clock stops, but not the game clock since it ended on a run (knee down).  Either way, the Saints could have punched in another score easily, but chose not to.  The Lions didn&#039;t even line up to hike the ball - the game was over.  

The Lions played very well for three quarters in a tough place to play.  It might have been a different outcome if the Lions were able to do something with the two recovered fumbles.  When the Saints defense made the stops and takeaways, they kept scoring.  That&#039;s how you win in the playoffs.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How about we just go to the highlight reel and review the two plays in question:</p>
<p><span class='embed-youtube' style='text-align:center; display: block;'><iframe class='youtube-player' type='text/html' width='635' height='388' src='http://www.youtube.com/embed/hf8q7mc4_gQ?version=3&#038;rel=1&#038;fs=1&#038;showsearch=0&#038;showinfo=1&#038;iv_load_policy=1&#038;wmode=transparent' frameborder='0'></iframe></span><br />
watch the highlights.</p>
<p>at 2:48 shows all the saints (and some Lions) clearly standing around because the play was called dead.</p>
<p>at 2:52 when your guy picked up the ball &#8211; Robert Meachem (Saints fastest receiver) was only 2 yards from him.  He was walking slowly back since the play had been whistled dead.  He would have been running and even closer to your guy if there was no whistle.  Lions still recover, but no TD.</p>
<p>Same highlight reel:</p>
<p>Go to 5:11 you can see that even after Brees pulled the ball back to his body that it was still forward of the down marker &#8211;  he was pushed back by the pile.</p>
<p>As for the last 38 seconds&#8230;. Don&#8217;t know the exact rule. Some say that the play clock stops, but not the game clock since it ended on a run (knee down).  Either way, the Saints could have punched in another score easily, but chose not to.  The Lions didn&#8217;t even line up to hike the ball &#8211; the game was over.  </p>
<p>The Lions played very well for three quarters in a tough place to play.  It might have been a different outcome if the Lions were able to do something with the two recovered fumbles.  When the Saints defense made the stops and takeaways, they kept scoring.  That&#8217;s how you win in the playoffs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: leofan1234</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/01/08/league-admits-errors-on-lions-saints-fumble/#comment-1500288</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[leofan1234]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2012 19:49:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=178382#comment-1500288</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[jackntorres says: 
Jan 9, 2012 1:03 PM 
please show me the article or comment you are referring to. Schwartz, in all interviews I have heard and read, has blatantly said that we lost this game to poor tackling and missed opportunities (3 dropped INT’s).

Did you even watch the game? It was not the blowout the score indicates. It was much closer and if you watched the game you would know that.
———————
I watched the game. If you read the article the saints should have gotten the ball by the letter of the law, and we kneeled down at the goal line when it was 45-28. The game was every bit of a blowout. The lions could not stop the run and could not cover receivers streaking down the field wide open. Get real.

___________________________
I wasn&#039;t debating that the Saints shouldn&#039;t have had the ball....My point is that there are people on here that comment that don&#039;t watch games (you know they do). The guy I quoted is implying that Schwartz was blaming the refs -- which we both know is not true. He admitted it was bad defense (and so do I). I&#039;m not trying to be a d!ck. 

I never once thought we would actually win, but you can&#039;t tell me that going into the fourth quarter you weren&#039;t just a little nervous (just a smidge) that the Lions *might* actually pull off the upset. The middle to end fourth quarter was a blow out. I will give you that. I guess my definition of a blowout is different than yours.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>jackntorres says:<br />
Jan 9, 2012 1:03 PM<br />
please show me the article or comment you are referring to. Schwartz, in all interviews I have heard and read, has blatantly said that we lost this game to poor tackling and missed opportunities (3 dropped INT’s).</p>
<p>Did you even watch the game? It was not the blowout the score indicates. It was much closer and if you watched the game you would know that.<br />
———————<br />
I watched the game. If you read the article the saints should have gotten the ball by the letter of the law, and we kneeled down at the goal line when it was 45-28. The game was every bit of a blowout. The lions could not stop the run and could not cover receivers streaking down the field wide open. Get real.</p>
<p>___________________________<br />
I wasn&#8217;t debating that the Saints shouldn&#8217;t have had the ball&#8230;.My point is that there are people on here that comment that don&#8217;t watch games (you know they do). The guy I quoted is implying that Schwartz was blaming the refs &#8212; which we both know is not true. He admitted it was bad defense (and so do I). I&#8217;m not trying to be a d!ck. </p>
<p>I never once thought we would actually win, but you can&#8217;t tell me that going into the fourth quarter you weren&#8217;t just a little nervous (just a smidge) that the Lions *might* actually pull off the upset. The middle to end fourth quarter was a blow out. I will give you that. I guess my definition of a blowout is different than yours.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BJ Swearer</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/01/08/league-admits-errors-on-lions-saints-fumble/#comment-1500263</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[BJ Swearer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2012 19:44:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=178382#comment-1500263</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[To the NFL and to the writer of this article:

I suggest that you look up the Ed Hochuli Rule which determined that  &quot;An inadvertent whistle which occurs during the course of a fumble does not prevent a player from recovering the football in the immediate aftermath of said whistle.&quot; 

So no, the Refs made the textbook CORRECT call during the Lions/Saints game and made the absolute INCORRECT call during the Broncos/Steelers game.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To the NFL and to the writer of this article:</p>
<p>I suggest that you look up the Ed Hochuli Rule which determined that  &#8220;An inadvertent whistle which occurs during the course of a fumble does not prevent a player from recovering the football in the immediate aftermath of said whistle.&#8221; </p>
<p>So no, the Refs made the textbook CORRECT call during the Lions/Saints game and made the absolute INCORRECT call during the Broncos/Steelers game.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: frank booth</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/01/08/league-admits-errors-on-lions-saints-fumble/#comment-1500204</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[frank booth]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2012 19:26:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=178382#comment-1500204</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Do the Lions fans ever stop whining?  They bitch and moan about the refs after every single game on these boards- Whiniest fans on PFT for sure!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do the Lions fans ever stop whining?  They bitch and moan about the refs after every single game on these boards- Whiniest fans on PFT for sure!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hawker1</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/01/08/league-admits-errors-on-lions-saints-fumble/#comment-1500085</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[hawker1]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2012 18:57:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=178382#comment-1500085</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@igetlaidmorethanyou..........Yeah, but do you make them all use condoms?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@igetlaidmorethanyou&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;.Yeah, but do you make them all use condoms?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jackntorres</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/01/08/league-admits-errors-on-lions-saints-fumble/#comment-1500011</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jackntorres]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2012 18:35:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=178382#comment-1500011</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[All these fools here, mainly Saints fans, a team I like. Feel that this argument is about the win or öoss of the final score. Nope, its about justice of the league being fair and equal. How can the officials just say ooppss two weeks in a row against the Lions and pts on the board. Last week 14 this week 7. An actual differance of 24 GB and 10 for the Saints. Now you guys can imply it makes no difference because of the score. But the fact remains teams play different down 14 or 4. Playing into another teams strategic advantage is like not blocking for a scream pass when the QB wants to throw a bomb. A major disadvantage for the team trying to catch up. I believe the outcome would have had the same team wining. But I want good football games and not dictated results. And thats what it looks like. We all seem to forget the first half of the SB Card and Steelers. Arizona was not allowed to move the ball due to spotlight seeking officials. I almost turned it off because of the ref dominance of the game. But the secon half was so awsome many believe it to be the best SB ever. Nope only the best second half SB ever.
-------
CAN YOU READ? The refs gave the lions the ball when the saints should have gotten it. The score should have been 59-21]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All these fools here, mainly Saints fans, a team I like. Feel that this argument is about the win or öoss of the final score. Nope, its about justice of the league being fair and equal. How can the officials just say ooppss two weeks in a row against the Lions and pts on the board. Last week 14 this week 7. An actual differance of 24 GB and 10 for the Saints. Now you guys can imply it makes no difference because of the score. But the fact remains teams play different down 14 or 4. Playing into another teams strategic advantage is like not blocking for a scream pass when the QB wants to throw a bomb. A major disadvantage for the team trying to catch up. I believe the outcome would have had the same team wining. But I want good football games and not dictated results. And thats what it looks like. We all seem to forget the first half of the SB Card and Steelers. Arizona was not allowed to move the ball due to spotlight seeking officials. I almost turned it off because of the ref dominance of the game. But the secon half was so awsome many believe it to be the best SB ever. Nope only the best second half SB ever.<br />
&#8212;&#8212;-<br />
CAN YOU READ? The refs gave the lions the ball when the saints should have gotten it. The score should have been 59-21</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jmmisview</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/01/08/league-admits-errors-on-lions-saints-fumble/#comment-1499924</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jmmisview]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2012 18:07:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=178382#comment-1499924</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[All these fools here, mainly Saints fans, a team I like. Feel that this argument is about the win or öoss of the final score. Nope, its about justice of the league being fair and equal. How can the officials just say ooppss two weeks in a row against the Lions and pts on the board. Last week 14 this week 7. An actual differance of 24 GB and 10 for the Saints. Now you guys can imply it makes no difference because of the score. But the fact remains teams play different down 14 or 4. Playing into another teams strategic advantage is like not blocking for a scream pass when the QB wants to throw a bomb. A major disadvantage for the team trying to catch up. I believe the outcome would have had the same team wining. But I want good football games and not dictated results. And thats what it looks like. We all seem to forget the first half of the SB Card and Steelers. Arizona was not allowed to move the ball due to spotlight seeking officials. I almost turned it off because of the ref dominance of the game. But the secon half was so awsome many believe it to be the best SB ever. Nope only the best second half SB ever.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All these fools here, mainly Saints fans, a team I like. Feel that this argument is about the win or öoss of the final score. Nope, its about justice of the league being fair and equal. How can the officials just say ooppss two weeks in a row against the Lions and pts on the board. Last week 14 this week 7. An actual differance of 24 GB and 10 for the Saints. Now you guys can imply it makes no difference because of the score. But the fact remains teams play different down 14 or 4. Playing into another teams strategic advantage is like not blocking for a scream pass when the QB wants to throw a bomb. A major disadvantage for the team trying to catch up. I believe the outcome would have had the same team wining. But I want good football games and not dictated results. And thats what it looks like. We all seem to forget the first half of the SB Card and Steelers. Arizona was not allowed to move the ball due to spotlight seeking officials. I almost turned it off because of the ref dominance of the game. But the secon half was so awsome many believe it to be the best SB ever. Nope only the best second half SB ever.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jackntorres</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/01/08/league-admits-errors-on-lions-saints-fumble/#comment-1499917</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jackntorres]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2012 18:03:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=178382#comment-1499917</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[please show me the article or comment you are referring to. Schwartz, in all interviews I have heard and read, has blatantly said that we lost this game to poor tackling and missed opportunities (3 dropped INT’s).

Did you even watch the game? It was not the blowout the score indicates. It was much closer and if you watched the game you would know that.
---------------------
I watched the game. If you read the article the saints should have gotten the ball by the letter of the law, and we kneeled down at the goal line when it was 45-28. The game was every bit of a blowout. The lions could not stop the run and could not cover receivers streaking down the field wide open. Get real.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>please show me the article or comment you are referring to. Schwartz, in all interviews I have heard and read, has blatantly said that we lost this game to poor tackling and missed opportunities (3 dropped INT’s).</p>
<p>Did you even watch the game? It was not the blowout the score indicates. It was much closer and if you watched the game you would know that.<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;<br />
I watched the game. If you read the article the saints should have gotten the ball by the letter of the law, and we kneeled down at the goal line when it was 45-28. The game was every bit of a blowout. The lions could not stop the run and could not cover receivers streaking down the field wide open. Get real.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: longdrivesaint</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/01/08/league-admits-errors-on-lions-saints-fumble/#comment-1499886</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[longdrivesaint]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2012 17:54:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=178382#comment-1499886</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Jan 9, 2012 9:32 AM 
They also butchered the 4th down dive play by Brees. This was on the same drive with the horrible 3rd down spot I believe. He jumped over the pile, stuck the ball out and pulled it back. This isn’t like crossing the plane of the goal line, if you are in the field of play and voluntarily go backwards you do not get forward progress. 

Nevermind the fact that Suh also stripped him of the ball and recovered it.

-------------------------------------------
FORWARD PROGRESS FOR THE LAST TIME. Quit the crying and Suc(suh) didn&#039;t recover. Check the replay. Haters will hate plain and simple.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jan 9, 2012 9:32 AM<br />
They also butchered the 4th down dive play by Brees. This was on the same drive with the horrible 3rd down spot I believe. He jumped over the pile, stuck the ball out and pulled it back. This isn’t like crossing the plane of the goal line, if you are in the field of play and voluntarily go backwards you do not get forward progress. </p>
<p>Nevermind the fact that Suh also stripped him of the ball and recovered it.</p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-<br />
FORWARD PROGRESS FOR THE LAST TIME. Quit the crying and Suc(suh) didn&#8217;t recover. Check the replay. Haters will hate plain and simple.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tbone188</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/01/08/league-admits-errors-on-lions-saints-fumble/#comment-1499801</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[tbone188]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2012 17:33:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=178382#comment-1499801</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think the only reason this is an issue is because the replays are scrutinized adnausium. Today&#039;s  technology is so far advanced they would make anyone look bad. These refs are also trying to stop unnecessary injuries by stopping the play as soon as it&#039;s over,]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the only reason this is an issue is because the replays are scrutinized adnausium. Today&#8217;s  technology is so far advanced they would make anyone look bad. These refs are also trying to stop unnecessary injuries by stopping the play as soon as it&#8217;s over,</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: leofan1234</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/01/08/league-admits-errors-on-lions-saints-fumble/#comment-1499795</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[leofan1234]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2012 17:32:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=178382#comment-1499795</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[musicman495 says: 
Jan 9, 2012 12:07 AM 
———————————
Well, well, well. Does this mean I won’t be reading any more dopey comments from Jim Schwartz about how the refs stole the game from him and his team?
_______________________________
please show me the article or comment you are referring to. Schwartz, in all interviews I have heard and read, has blatantly said that we lost this game to poor tackling and missed opportunities (3 dropped INT&#039;s). 

Did you even watch the game? It was not the blowout the score indicates. It was much closer and if you watched the game you would know that.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>musicman495 says:<br />
Jan 9, 2012 12:07 AM<br />
———————————<br />
Well, well, well. Does this mean I won’t be reading any more dopey comments from Jim Schwartz about how the refs stole the game from him and his team?<br />
_______________________________<br />
please show me the article or comment you are referring to. Schwartz, in all interviews I have heard and read, has blatantly said that we lost this game to poor tackling and missed opportunities (3 dropped INT&#8217;s). </p>
<p>Did you even watch the game? It was not the blowout the score indicates. It was much closer and if you watched the game you would know that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bobhk</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/01/08/league-admits-errors-on-lions-saints-fumble/#comment-1499787</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[bobhk]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2012 17:31:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=178382#comment-1499787</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[fatdaddy73 says:
Jan 9, 2012 9:50 AM
bobhk says:
Jan 9, 2012 12:47 AM
It was a blown call for sure.

But, I for one, say that the Saints would have still won. They came out and imposed their will on the lions in the second half.

Lions had two things going against them: they couldn’t tackle anyone (is this the worst tackling effort anyone has ever seen?) and they could not run the ball themselves. It was like run-n-shoot all over again. Brees basically had his way with them.

Lions better get a running game and a better D.

————————————————–
Yes the Lions need to get better, they will. The other equally important call was the spot of the ball on a 3rd down play by the saints from their own 10. Meachem made the catch, and was CLEARLY short of the first down by at least 6 inches, the official gave a ridiculous spot giving the the first down by over a foot… If an official can’t be accurate and precise, they shouldn’t be an official. No challenge came from Schwartz, I don’t blame him, the refs changing the spot of the ball after replay is about as rare as hens teeth…
--------
Are you saying that the lions have never been beneficiaries of bad calls? It goes both ways.

I am not a Saints fan but they kicked the lions tail all over the place in the second half. As bad a the lions played on D and how one dimensional they were they got what was coming.

Stop making excuses.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>fatdaddy73 says:<br />
Jan 9, 2012 9:50 AM<br />
bobhk says:<br />
Jan 9, 2012 12:47 AM<br />
It was a blown call for sure.</p>
<p>But, I for one, say that the Saints would have still won. They came out and imposed their will on the lions in the second half.</p>
<p>Lions had two things going against them: they couldn’t tackle anyone (is this the worst tackling effort anyone has ever seen?) and they could not run the ball themselves. It was like run-n-shoot all over again. Brees basically had his way with them.</p>
<p>Lions better get a running game and a better D.</p>
<p>————————————————–<br />
Yes the Lions need to get better, they will. The other equally important call was the spot of the ball on a 3rd down play by the saints from their own 10. Meachem made the catch, and was CLEARLY short of the first down by at least 6 inches, the official gave a ridiculous spot giving the the first down by over a foot… If an official can’t be accurate and precise, they shouldn’t be an official. No challenge came from Schwartz, I don’t blame him, the refs changing the spot of the ball after replay is about as rare as hens teeth…<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;<br />
Are you saying that the lions have never been beneficiaries of bad calls? It goes both ways.</p>
<p>I am not a Saints fan but they kicked the lions tail all over the place in the second half. As bad a the lions played on D and how one dimensional they were they got what was coming.</p>
<p>Stop making excuses.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rmc1995</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/01/08/league-admits-errors-on-lions-saints-fumble/#comment-1499685</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[rmc1995]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2012 17:04:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=178382#comment-1499685</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[KC wants to be New England so badly they will hire a successful Super Bowl winning defensive coordinator who was once s fired head coach for the Browns.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>KC wants to be New England so badly they will hire a successful Super Bowl winning defensive coordinator who was once s fired head coach for the Browns.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jackntorres</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/01/08/league-admits-errors-on-lions-saints-fumble/#comment-1499645</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jackntorres]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2012 16:57:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=178382#comment-1499645</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[people,

one or two blatantly bad calls don’t change the game from this kind of blow out. however, there were a half dozen momentum killers called by the refs:

1. killing the play on the brees fumble before allowing the play to end. td? who knows? but at worst, better field position.

2. apply end zone rules to ball spot on fourth down when brees thrust the ball forward beyond the first down marker and then, while still suspended, pulled the ball back into his body, instinctively protecting it. at the end zone, the play ends when the ball breaks the plane. but midfield, the ball is spotted at the point that the ball carrier’s forward progress ends. had brees been tackled with the ball thrust forward, the spot would have been fine. by pulling it back into his body, the forward momentum gets redefined. when the play ended, the ball was short of the first down marker. the ball should have been detroit’s, getting the defense off the field, taking 60 yards off the saints’ total yardage along with seven points.

3. bad spot on the third down catch that was caught a foot shy of the marker.

4. holding call on backus vs zero holding calls on saints.

5. personal foul on wright for allowing his right arm fly up while trying to block the end zone pass and, while struggling to leverage the ball out of the receiver’s possession, using the receiver’s helmet – without intent – to recover balance.

6. pass interference on wright (i think) for the sort of touching that goes on all game long vs no pass interference on a cj pass where the defender was on his back before the ball arriived.

add it all together and the refs made sure the lions defense stayed on the field and extra five or ten minutes. that’s not to say the lions would have won. but the game might well have gone to the last play. and it’s unlikely brees would have recorded record yardage.

no question the saints are a better team with a highly skilled offensive unit that has been together long enough to intuit what everyone’s going to do. the lions need another two years to get there, assuming continuity of play makers and a return of injured running backs.

on defense, they need two more play makers and they need a fair shake from the refs. no t

----------

I don&#039;t know if there are books in Detroit or not. What part of &quot;bringing the ball back towards your body does not constitute a loss of forward progress&quot; does your mind not comprehend?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>people,</p>
<p>one or two blatantly bad calls don’t change the game from this kind of blow out. however, there were a half dozen momentum killers called by the refs:</p>
<p>1. killing the play on the brees fumble before allowing the play to end. td? who knows? but at worst, better field position.</p>
<p>2. apply end zone rules to ball spot on fourth down when brees thrust the ball forward beyond the first down marker and then, while still suspended, pulled the ball back into his body, instinctively protecting it. at the end zone, the play ends when the ball breaks the plane. but midfield, the ball is spotted at the point that the ball carrier’s forward progress ends. had brees been tackled with the ball thrust forward, the spot would have been fine. by pulling it back into his body, the forward momentum gets redefined. when the play ended, the ball was short of the first down marker. the ball should have been detroit’s, getting the defense off the field, taking 60 yards off the saints’ total yardage along with seven points.</p>
<p>3. bad spot on the third down catch that was caught a foot shy of the marker.</p>
<p>4. holding call on backus vs zero holding calls on saints.</p>
<p>5. personal foul on wright for allowing his right arm fly up while trying to block the end zone pass and, while struggling to leverage the ball out of the receiver’s possession, using the receiver’s helmet – without intent – to recover balance.</p>
<p>6. pass interference on wright (i think) for the sort of touching that goes on all game long vs no pass interference on a cj pass where the defender was on his back before the ball arriived.</p>
<p>add it all together and the refs made sure the lions defense stayed on the field and extra five or ten minutes. that’s not to say the lions would have won. but the game might well have gone to the last play. and it’s unlikely brees would have recorded record yardage.</p>
<p>no question the saints are a better team with a highly skilled offensive unit that has been together long enough to intuit what everyone’s going to do. the lions need another two years to get there, assuming continuity of play makers and a return of injured running backs.</p>
<p>on defense, they need two more play makers and they need a fair shake from the refs. no t</p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know if there are books in Detroit or not. What part of &#8220;bringing the ball back towards your body does not constitute a loss of forward progress&#8221; does your mind not comprehend?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sojumaster</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/01/08/league-admits-errors-on-lions-saints-fumble/#comment-1499587</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[sojumaster]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2012 16:43:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=178382#comment-1499587</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ridiculousbacon says:Jan 9, 2012 10:22 AM 

I would pay good money to see any of the whiners here ref a single series in the NFL. Do you have any idea how much is going on at once during the live game? Personally, I’ve always been shocked the refs aren’t worse every wkend, but maybe that’s just because I don’t continously complain about things I don’t have any experience with….
 
But the Bottom Line is that if the players, coaches, owners, etc. aren’t complaining, their “fans” certainly shouldn’t be, and that goes for any sport.

--------------------------

The coaches, owners and players do not complain about the refs, because they will get fined for publically critizing the officals.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ridiculousbacon says:Jan 9, 2012 10:22 AM </p>
<p>I would pay good money to see any of the whiners here ref a single series in the NFL. Do you have any idea how much is going on at once during the live game? Personally, I’ve always been shocked the refs aren’t worse every wkend, but maybe that’s just because I don’t continously complain about things I don’t have any experience with….</p>
<p>But the Bottom Line is that if the players, coaches, owners, etc. aren’t complaining, their “fans” certainly shouldn’t be, and that goes for any sport.</p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;</p>
<p>The coaches, owners and players do not complain about the refs, because they will get fined for publically critizing the officals.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sojumaster</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/01/08/league-admits-errors-on-lions-saints-fumble/#comment-1499506</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[sojumaster]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2012 16:25:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=178382#comment-1499506</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[jackntorres says:Jan 9, 2012 9:18 AM 

Why does everyone assume it would have been a TD for the Lions? The Saints players didn’t attempt to recover the ball when the whistle blew. If the ref hadn’t blown the whistle, the Saints could have recovered the ball. So all in all, the Lions got lucky.
 
But this is all spilt milk. Lions are sitting at home. Saints are getting ready for 49ers.
 
———————————–
 
There was no way the Saints could have recovered the ball. The ball landed at the feet of 6 Lions and there was not a Saints player within 5 yards of the ball.
 
—————
 Doesn’t mean he would’ve scored. It was definitely not a CB as someone mentioned it was a LB I think durant. He may not have even kept the ball. Think meachem at the redskins in 09

----------------------------------------

My response was more to the comment of &quot;If the ref hadn’t blown the whistle, the Saints could have recovered the ball&quot; .... Which there is 0% of that happening.  Albiet the Lions might have not scored, but there is no doubt the Lions would have had a lot better field position if the play was allowed to progress without the accidental whisle.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>jackntorres says:Jan 9, 2012 9:18 AM </p>
<p>Why does everyone assume it would have been a TD for the Lions? The Saints players didn’t attempt to recover the ball when the whistle blew. If the ref hadn’t blown the whistle, the Saints could have recovered the ball. So all in all, the Lions got lucky.</p>
<p>But this is all spilt milk. Lions are sitting at home. Saints are getting ready for 49ers.</p>
<p>———————————–</p>
<p>There was no way the Saints could have recovered the ball. The ball landed at the feet of 6 Lions and there was not a Saints player within 5 yards of the ball.</p>
<p>—————<br />
 Doesn’t mean he would’ve scored. It was definitely not a CB as someone mentioned it was a LB I think durant. He may not have even kept the ball. Think meachem at the redskins in 09</p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-</p>
<p>My response was more to the comment of &#8220;If the ref hadn’t blown the whistle, the Saints could have recovered the ball&#8221; &#8230;. Which there is 0% of that happening.  Albiet the Lions might have not scored, but there is no doubt the Lions would have had a lot better field position if the play was allowed to progress without the accidental whisle.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: saints25</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/01/08/league-admits-errors-on-lions-saints-fumble/#comment-1499482</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[saints25]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2012 16:19:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=178382#comment-1499482</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Of course he was throwing the ball!!!! Lions defender didnt punch it out,that damn far...NFL refs have screwed a bunch of NFL Teams...But they dont get fined for their mistakes.NFL needs to take money for these clowns for making bad calls,or do background checks to make sure these refs arent gambling on these Football games..Its been as bad as I&#039;ve ever seen.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of course he was throwing the ball!!!! Lions defender didnt punch it out,that damn far&#8230;NFL refs have screwed a bunch of NFL Teams&#8230;But they dont get fined for their mistakes.NFL needs to take money for these clowns for making bad calls,or do background checks to make sure these refs arent gambling on these Football games..Its been as bad as I&#8217;ve ever seen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rhoneyman</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/01/08/league-admits-errors-on-lions-saints-fumble/#comment-1499394</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[rhoneyman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2012 16:02:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=178382#comment-1499394</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[to finish...

no team is going to win if incompetent officiating prevents the defense from sitting down every so often.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>to finish&#8230;</p>
<p>no team is going to win if incompetent officiating prevents the defense from sitting down every so often.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rhoneyman</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/01/08/league-admits-errors-on-lions-saints-fumble/#comment-1499387</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[rhoneyman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2012 16:01:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=178382#comment-1499387</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[people,

one or two blatantly bad calls don&#039;t change the game from this kind of blow out.  however, there were a half dozen momentum killers called by the refs:

1. killing the play on the brees fumble before allowing the play to end.  td?  who knows?  but at worst, better field position.

2. apply end zone rules to ball spot on fourth down when brees thrust the ball forward beyond the first down marker and then, while still suspended, pulled the ball back into his body, instinctively protecting it.  at the end zone, the play ends when the ball breaks the plane.  but midfield, the ball is spotted at the point that the ball carrier&#039;s forward progress ends.  had brees been tackled with the ball thrust forward, the spot would have been fine.  by pulling it back into his body, the forward momentum gets redefined.  when the play ended, the ball was short of the first down marker.  the ball should have been detroit&#039;s, getting the defense off the field, taking 60 yards off the saints&#039; total yardage along with seven points.

3. bad spot on the third down catch that was caught a foot shy of the marker.  

4. holding call on backus vs zero holding calls on saints.

5. personal foul on wright for allowing his right arm fly up while trying to block the end zone pass and, while struggling to leverage the ball out of the receiver&#039;s possession, using the receiver&#039;s helmet - without intent - to recover balance.  

6. pass interference on wright (i think) for the sort of touching that goes on all game long vs no pass interference on a cj pass where the defender was on his back before the ball arriived.

add it all together and the refs made sure the lions defense stayed on the field and extra five or ten minutes.  that&#039;s not to say the lions would have won.  but the game might well have gone to the last play.  and it&#039;s unlikely brees would have recorded record yardage.  

no question the saints are a better team with a highly skilled offensive unit that has been together long enough to intuit what everyone&#039;s going to do.  the lions need another two years to get there, assuming continuity of play makers and a return of injured running backs.

on defense, they need two more play makers and they need a fair shake from the refs.  no t]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>people,</p>
<p>one or two blatantly bad calls don&#8217;t change the game from this kind of blow out.  however, there were a half dozen momentum killers called by the refs:</p>
<p>1. killing the play on the brees fumble before allowing the play to end.  td?  who knows?  but at worst, better field position.</p>
<p>2. apply end zone rules to ball spot on fourth down when brees thrust the ball forward beyond the first down marker and then, while still suspended, pulled the ball back into his body, instinctively protecting it.  at the end zone, the play ends when the ball breaks the plane.  but midfield, the ball is spotted at the point that the ball carrier&#8217;s forward progress ends.  had brees been tackled with the ball thrust forward, the spot would have been fine.  by pulling it back into his body, the forward momentum gets redefined.  when the play ended, the ball was short of the first down marker.  the ball should have been detroit&#8217;s, getting the defense off the field, taking 60 yards off the saints&#8217; total yardage along with seven points.</p>
<p>3. bad spot on the third down catch that was caught a foot shy of the marker.  </p>
<p>4. holding call on backus vs zero holding calls on saints.</p>
<p>5. personal foul on wright for allowing his right arm fly up while trying to block the end zone pass and, while struggling to leverage the ball out of the receiver&#8217;s possession, using the receiver&#8217;s helmet &#8211; without intent &#8211; to recover balance.  </p>
<p>6. pass interference on wright (i think) for the sort of touching that goes on all game long vs no pass interference on a cj pass where the defender was on his back before the ball arriived.</p>
<p>add it all together and the refs made sure the lions defense stayed on the field and extra five or ten minutes.  that&#8217;s not to say the lions would have won.  but the game might well have gone to the last play.  and it&#8217;s unlikely brees would have recorded record yardage.  </p>
<p>no question the saints are a better team with a highly skilled offensive unit that has been together long enough to intuit what everyone&#8217;s going to do.  the lions need another two years to get there, assuming continuity of play makers and a return of injured running backs.</p>
<p>on defense, they need two more play makers and they need a fair shake from the refs.  no t</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bdub1147</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/01/08/league-admits-errors-on-lions-saints-fumble/#comment-1499347</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[bdub1147]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2012 15:51:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=178382#comment-1499347</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I agree with kngunde, reviewing every score is a good start, but they also need to review every play that could have been a touchdown but wasn&#039;t called one on the field. Doing it one way and not the other is unfair to the offense by forcing them to use challenges when the defensive team doesn&#039;t need to. 

While they are at it, they should let an extra official make the call directly and stop having the on-field official go into the booth. They should both be looking for the same conclusive proof and it still slows the game down too much.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with kngunde, reviewing every score is a good start, but they also need to review every play that could have been a touchdown but wasn&#8217;t called one on the field. Doing it one way and not the other is unfair to the offense by forcing them to use challenges when the defensive team doesn&#8217;t need to. </p>
<p>While they are at it, they should let an extra official make the call directly and stop having the on-field official go into the booth. They should both be looking for the same conclusive proof and it still slows the game down too much.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shlort</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/01/08/league-admits-errors-on-lions-saints-fumble/#comment-1499312</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[shlort]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2012 15:44:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=178382#comment-1499312</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It has always been the same. Humans are referees, and humans make mistakes. Now days we have HD TV and super slow-mo replay. The networks show us the play 10 times in slow motion and we think &quot;What? Is that referee blind?&quot;. Truth is, it happens a lot faster than that on the field. The referees blow the whistle to end plays and protect players from un-neccessary injury. Think about it. Do we want to see star players from our favorite teams injured in a scrum that should be a dead ball situation? If that were to start happening, people would be complaining about that too. It is what it is. Coaches have the ability to challenge a couple calls a game. Better than it used to be before challenges and all the new camera angles.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It has always been the same. Humans are referees, and humans make mistakes. Now days we have HD TV and super slow-mo replay. The networks show us the play 10 times in slow motion and we think &#8220;What? Is that referee blind?&#8221;. Truth is, it happens a lot faster than that on the field. The referees blow the whistle to end plays and protect players from un-neccessary injury. Think about it. Do we want to see star players from our favorite teams injured in a scrum that should be a dead ball situation? If that were to start happening, people would be complaining about that too. It is what it is. Coaches have the ability to challenge a couple calls a game. Better than it used to be before challenges and all the new camera angles.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cdsaints</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/01/08/league-admits-errors-on-lions-saints-fumble/#comment-1499277</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[cdsaints]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2012 15:36:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=178382#comment-1499277</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Those of you whining about forward progress on the 4th and 1 need to read the  rules. Anyway, lets not forget the Saints were kneeling the ball on the 2 yard line....so instead of 35 second half points they could have scored 42. The Lions got tamed, end of story. (oh yeah, I went there)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Those of you whining about forward progress on the 4th and 1 need to read the  rules. Anyway, lets not forget the Saints were kneeling the ball on the 2 yard line&#8230;.so instead of 35 second half points they could have scored 42. The Lions got tamed, end of story. (oh yeah, I went there)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: warwicklionsfan</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/01/08/league-admits-errors-on-lions-saints-fumble/#comment-1499239</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[warwicklionsfan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2012 15:30:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=178382#comment-1499239</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ok...for years I have told my Basketball/Hockey loving family members, who complain about officiating in the NBA/NHL that Football is better. A penalty is a penalty regardless of the team and the when the penalty occurred in a game of football...well, things have changed...football has has sadly become the new NBA...no defense and the refs control the game. The league is even worried about how they dress. I guess I will sit and watch dunks. Oops, I mean touchdown passes on sportscenter all night.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok&#8230;for years I have told my Basketball/Hockey loving family members, who complain about officiating in the NBA/NHL that Football is better. A penalty is a penalty regardless of the team and the when the penalty occurred in a game of football&#8230;well, things have changed&#8230;football has has sadly become the new NBA&#8230;no defense and the refs control the game. The league is even worried about how they dress. I guess I will sit and watch dunks. Oops, I mean touchdown passes on sportscenter all night.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ridiculousbacon</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/01/08/league-admits-errors-on-lions-saints-fumble/#comment-1499209</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ridiculousbacon]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2012 15:22:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=178382#comment-1499209</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I would pay good money to see any of the whiners here ref a single series in the NFL. Do you have any idea how much is going on at once during the live game? Personally, I&#039;ve always been shocked the refs aren&#039;t worse every wkend, but maybe that&#039;s just because I don&#039;t continously complain about things I don&#039;t have any experience with....

But the Bottom Line is that if the players, coaches, owners, etc. aren&#039;t complaining, their &quot;fans&quot; certainly shouldn&#039;t be, and that goes for any sport.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would pay good money to see any of the whiners here ref a single series in the NFL. Do you have any idea how much is going on at once during the live game? Personally, I&#8217;ve always been shocked the refs aren&#8217;t worse every wkend, but maybe that&#8217;s just because I don&#8217;t continously complain about things I don&#8217;t have any experience with&#8230;.</p>
<p>But the Bottom Line is that if the players, coaches, owners, etc. aren&#8217;t complaining, their &#8220;fans&#8221; certainly shouldn&#8217;t be, and that goes for any sport.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: easyeddie</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/01/08/league-admits-errors-on-lions-saints-fumble/#comment-1499142</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[easyeddie]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2012 15:00:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=178382#comment-1499142</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[igetlaidmorethanyou says: 

Obvious to everyone except Cryon fans and conspiracy theorists. Saints kicked their a– up and down the field. Coulda scored 50+ but took their foot off the pedal
---------------------------------------
if the Saints get hosed by the refs sometime this postseason and that it costs them the game your tune will change.

1historian says: what part of ’45-28′ don’t you understand?
-----------------------------------------
Again, wait til it (hopefully) happens to the Saints. P.S.: Here&#039;s to Aldon Smith decapitating Drew Brees.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>igetlaidmorethanyou says: </p>
<p>Obvious to everyone except Cryon fans and conspiracy theorists. Saints kicked their a– up and down the field. Coulda scored 50+ but took their foot off the pedal<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;<br />
if the Saints get hosed by the refs sometime this postseason and that it costs them the game your tune will change.</p>
<p>1historian says: what part of ’45-28′ don’t you understand?<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;<br />
Again, wait til it (hopefully) happens to the Saints. P.S.: Here&#8217;s to Aldon Smith decapitating Drew Brees.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fatdaddy73</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/01/08/league-admits-errors-on-lions-saints-fumble/#comment-1499134</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[fatdaddy73]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2012 14:57:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=178382#comment-1499134</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[and the Saints got away with 20 extra holds more than the Lions.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>and the Saints got away with 20 extra holds more than the Lions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
