<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ryan Tannehill reportedly won&#8217;t play in Senior Bowl</title>
	<atom:link href="http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/01/10/ryan-tannehill-reportedly-wont-play-in-senior-bowl/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/01/10/ryan-tannehill-reportedly-wont-play-in-senior-bowl/</link>
	<description>ProFootballTalk on NBCSports.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 13:33:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: mburrichter</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/01/10/ryan-tannehill-reportedly-wont-play-in-senior-bowl/#comment-1506801</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[mburrichter]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2012 00:39:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=178681#comment-1506801</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Taneyhill playing wr was more about the lack of talent the Ags had at wr when Sherman came in.  Stephen McGee and Jerod Johnson were in front of him at qb.  Sherman installed Johnson and Taneyhill as wrs, in front of 17 scholarship wrs (OK, 16, Jeff Fuller was still the No 1 wr).   So, sorry, his playing wr for two years wasn&#039;t coaching stupidity.  He had two studs in front of him.  The guy is big, smart and runs a 4.6.  First rounder all the way.  He&#039;s a better prospect than Griffin.   Brandon Wheeden?  Are you kidding me?  Really?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Taneyhill playing wr was more about the lack of talent the Ags had at wr when Sherman came in.  Stephen McGee and Jerod Johnson were in front of him at qb.  Sherman installed Johnson and Taneyhill as wrs, in front of 17 scholarship wrs (OK, 16, Jeff Fuller was still the No 1 wr).   So, sorry, his playing wr for two years wasn&#8217;t coaching stupidity.  He had two studs in front of him.  The guy is big, smart and runs a 4.6.  First rounder all the way.  He&#8217;s a better prospect than Griffin.   Brandon Wheeden?  Are you kidding me?  Really?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: brenenostler</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/01/10/ryan-tannehill-reportedly-wont-play-in-senior-bowl/#comment-1504170</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[brenenostler]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2012 04:40:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=178681#comment-1504170</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@ soldierofislam 

I can really see Washington drafting him.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ soldierofislam </p>
<p>I can really see Washington drafting him.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 1bigtex</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/01/10/ryan-tannehill-reportedly-wont-play-in-senior-bowl/#comment-1503765</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[1bigtex]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2012 00:31:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=178681#comment-1503765</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@lucasstafford1989

Wheeden will be 29 next year, dude.  Not a lot of GMs clamoring to draft a 29 year-old QB.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@lucasstafford1989</p>
<p>Wheeden will be 29 next year, dude.  Not a lot of GMs clamoring to draft a 29 year-old QB.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cowhawkfan</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/01/10/ryan-tannehill-reportedly-wont-play-in-senior-bowl/#comment-1503635</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[cowhawkfan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2012 23:33:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=178681#comment-1503635</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tannehil played almost 2 years at QB, not one. Goes to show how bad his Aggie  coaches miss on evaluating players. They put this guy at WR, a good one, after it was initially decided he wasn&#039;t good enough to play QB at A&amp;M. He only got to play because the other guy. Stunk!!.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tannehil played almost 2 years at QB, not one. Goes to show how bad his Aggie  coaches miss on evaluating players. They put this guy at WR, a good one, after it was initially decided he wasn&#8217;t good enough to play QB at A&amp;M. He only got to play because the other guy. Stunk!!.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: trbowman</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/01/10/ryan-tannehill-reportedly-wont-play-in-senior-bowl/#comment-1503596</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[trbowman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2012 23:19:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=178681#comment-1503596</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;Tannehill might have made the first round as a WR if he remained at the position. That is something to consider.&quot;

He&#039;s going to go in the first round as a quarterback. This injury won&#039;t stop that]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Tannehill might have made the first round as a WR if he remained at the position. That is something to consider.&#8221;</p>
<p>He&#8217;s going to go in the first round as a quarterback. This injury won&#8217;t stop that</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: trbowman</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/01/10/ryan-tannehill-reportedly-wont-play-in-senior-bowl/#comment-1503577</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[trbowman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2012 23:12:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=178681#comment-1503577</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Second best QB in this draft behind Luck. Yes, better than Griffin.

Cleveland, Washington and Seattle would be the best fits.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Second best QB in this draft behind Luck. Yes, better than Griffin.</p>
<p>Cleveland, Washington and Seattle would be the best fits.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lucasstafford1989</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/01/10/ryan-tannehill-reportedly-wont-play-in-senior-bowl/#comment-1503531</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[lucasstafford1989]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2012 22:48:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=178681#comment-1503531</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tannehill is way overrated brandon weeden is a better qb thsn he is]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tannehill is way overrated brandon weeden is a better qb thsn he is</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: earthtopft</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/01/10/ryan-tannehill-reportedly-wont-play-in-senior-bowl/#comment-1503405</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[earthtopft]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2012 21:55:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=178681#comment-1503405</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tannehill might have made the first round as a WR if he remained at the position. That is something to consider.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tannehill might have made the first round as a WR if he remained at the position. That is something to consider.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: soldierofislam</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/01/10/ryan-tannehill-reportedly-wont-play-in-senior-bowl/#comment-1503291</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[soldierofislam]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2012 21:15:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=178681#comment-1503291</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With shanahan coaching the senior bowl, this chump did the right thing by not playing in it. He doesn&#039;t want to showcase himself for a coach and organization that is going no where in Washington.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With shanahan coaching the senior bowl, this chump did the right thing by not playing in it. He doesn&#8217;t want to showcase himself for a coach and organization that is going no where in Washington.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wryly1</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/01/10/ryan-tannehill-reportedly-wont-play-in-senior-bowl/#comment-1503217</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[wryly1]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2012 20:53:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=178681#comment-1503217</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[While Tannehill appears to posess the skill set to develop into an NFL starter, he&#039;s only played QB for one season at the Div I level. He&#039;ll be a project more than a prospect early in his pro career.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While Tannehill appears to posess the skill set to develop into an NFL starter, he&#8217;s only played QB for one season at the Div I level. He&#8217;ll be a project more than a prospect early in his pro career.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

