<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: League defends decision not to review Evans non-catch</title>
	<atom:link href="http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/01/22/league-defends-decision-not-to-review-evans-non-catch/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/01/22/league-defends-decision-not-to-review-evans-non-catch/</link>
	<description>ProFootballTalk on NBCSports.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 13:34:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: goforgin01</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/01/22/league-defends-decision-not-to-review-evans-non-catch/#comment-1560144</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[goforgin01]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 15:17:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=181118#comment-1560144</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Funny reading all of this now.

Calvin Johnson was a catch.  Lee Evans was a drop.

Still stings in Bmore today.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Funny reading all of this now.</p>
<p>Calvin Johnson was a catch.  Lee Evans was a drop.</p>
<p>Still stings in Bmore today.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bnwpnw</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/01/22/league-defends-decision-not-to-review-evans-non-catch/#comment-1546276</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[bnwpnw]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jan 2012 08:38:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=181118#comment-1546276</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Like Hutchinson before him, Peyton knows to play it safe:

If you&#039;re going to screw your team, always wear a Condon.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Like Hutchinson before him, Peyton knows to play it safe:</p>
<p>If you&#8217;re going to screw your team, always wear a Condon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kyedh3</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/01/22/league-defends-decision-not-to-review-evans-non-catch/#comment-1545276</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[kyedh3]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 19:52:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=181118#comment-1545276</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m not a fan of either team. But I think you err on the side of efficiency. The replay is inconclusive and the ruling on the field stands, so ultimately, it&#039;s irrelevant, except ... if I were a Ravens&#039; fan, I&#039;d have been unhappy about it at the time because it is close enough to be called bang-bang either way. But, as has so eloquently been pointed out, if Evans hangs on, Pats go home. He did not, so the Ravens go home. Better luck next year guys.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not a fan of either team. But I think you err on the side of efficiency. The replay is inconclusive and the ruling on the field stands, so ultimately, it&#8217;s irrelevant, except &#8230; if I were a Ravens&#8217; fan, I&#8217;d have been unhappy about it at the time because it is close enough to be called bang-bang either way. But, as has so eloquently been pointed out, if Evans hangs on, Pats go home. He did not, so the Ravens go home. Better luck next year guys.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pizzon</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/01/22/league-defends-decision-not-to-review-evans-non-catch/#comment-1543482</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[pizzon]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 22:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=181118#comment-1543482</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[funny how goodell and the rest of the dumbasses on park ave wanted a pats vs packers super bowl and well the giants took care of the packers and are now going to take care of the patriots.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>funny how goodell and the rest of the dumbasses on park ave wanted a pats vs packers super bowl and well the giants took care of the packers and are now going to take care of the patriots.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: havok82</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/01/22/league-defends-decision-not-to-review-evans-non-catch/#comment-1542797</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[havok82]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 19:00:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=181118#comment-1542797</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Talking about it won&#039;t change anything, even if the NFL admitted it was wrong. The NFL sent a letter to the Patriots after they lost to the Colts in the AFC CG to say &quot;Oops, faceguarding isn&#039;t actually a penalty&quot; so sorry we gave Indy a first and goal. 

It sucks, but it wasn&#039;t a catch...now move on to the next year.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Talking about it won&#8217;t change anything, even if the NFL admitted it was wrong. The NFL sent a letter to the Patriots after they lost to the Colts in the AFC CG to say &#8220;Oops, faceguarding isn&#8217;t actually a penalty&#8221; so sorry we gave Indy a first and goal. </p>
<p>It sucks, but it wasn&#8217;t a catch&#8230;now move on to the next year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eyesoreproductions</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/01/22/league-defends-decision-not-to-review-evans-non-catch/#comment-1542098</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[eyesoreproductions]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 14:58:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=181118#comment-1542098</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is a prime example where the rules get in the way with common sense transforming Football into traffic court.  Let&#039;s look at the facts that is undisbutable. Joe Flacco threw a pass. Correct? We can agree on that. Lee Evans was in the endzone. Right. We all agree. Lee Evans was facing Joe Flacco. Lee Evans reaches up, his feet leaves the ground. So far so good right? Lee Evans catches the ball. That&#039;s right. Lee Evans  got both hands on the ball. The ball wasn&#039;t bobbing in his hands. He caught the ball. The only alternative to that description would be  is he didnt catch the ball. That is he bobbled it or it bounced off his fingers say what happened to Boldin last year in the playoffs. But that wouldn&#039;t be describing w hat happened. So he caught the ball, that is if you were describing what happened to a blind person nano second per nanno second that&#039;s how you would describe. But not in universe that is  the NFL. Evans still didn&#039;t catch the ball. Even though the ball is securly in his hands and he brings the ball into the craddle possition. Even though he starts to turn. He&#039;s turning towards the official, His second leg is stretching towards the ground. The Defender is charging at him. The defender, actually is making a play in the endzone after the Ball is secured in his hands.  His foot is stretched towards the ground and in the third replay played on TV you can see Evans looking into the eyes of the Official waiting for the iconic arms of the Zebra Stripes thrusting in the air that never comes. And then bam. A brilliant strike by the defender and the ball pops loose. The question, at least for the NFL, did Evans get his second foot down. This is impossible to determine from the TV mainly because it&#039;s third generation video, but it&#039;s disputable and crazy that it wasn&#039;t reviewed.  But I&#039;m saying it was a touch down before that just out of common sense. I think the NFL needs to get away fromt the Calvin Johnson kind of games. I mean if your running  and you leap in the air over the goal line then  as soon as the ball crosses the plain of he goal line touchdown. No one can make a play on the ball in the endzone. But if you catch a ball the NFL sets themselves up for controversay allowing someone to make a play on the ball in the endzone.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a prime example where the rules get in the way with common sense transforming Football into traffic court.  Let&#8217;s look at the facts that is undisbutable. Joe Flacco threw a pass. Correct? We can agree on that. Lee Evans was in the endzone. Right. We all agree. Lee Evans was facing Joe Flacco. Lee Evans reaches up, his feet leaves the ground. So far so good right? Lee Evans catches the ball. That&#8217;s right. Lee Evans  got both hands on the ball. The ball wasn&#8217;t bobbing in his hands. He caught the ball. The only alternative to that description would be  is he didnt catch the ball. That is he bobbled it or it bounced off his fingers say what happened to Boldin last year in the playoffs. But that wouldn&#8217;t be describing w hat happened. So he caught the ball, that is if you were describing what happened to a blind person nano second per nanno second that&#8217;s how you would describe. But not in universe that is  the NFL. Evans still didn&#8217;t catch the ball. Even though the ball is securly in his hands and he brings the ball into the craddle possition. Even though he starts to turn. He&#8217;s turning towards the official, His second leg is stretching towards the ground. The Defender is charging at him. The defender, actually is making a play in the endzone after the Ball is secured in his hands.  His foot is stretched towards the ground and in the third replay played on TV you can see Evans looking into the eyes of the Official waiting for the iconic arms of the Zebra Stripes thrusting in the air that never comes. And then bam. A brilliant strike by the defender and the ball pops loose. The question, at least for the NFL, did Evans get his second foot down. This is impossible to determine from the TV mainly because it&#8217;s third generation video, but it&#8217;s disputable and crazy that it wasn&#8217;t reviewed.  But I&#8217;m saying it was a touch down before that just out of common sense. I think the NFL needs to get away fromt the Calvin Johnson kind of games. I mean if your running  and you leap in the air over the goal line then  as soon as the ball crosses the plain of he goal line touchdown. No one can make a play on the ball in the endzone. But if you catch a ball the NFL sets themselves up for controversay allowing someone to make a play on the ball in the endzone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: klownboy</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/01/22/league-defends-decision-not-to-review-evans-non-catch/#comment-1541988</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[klownboy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 14:09:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=181118#comment-1541988</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Ravens fans got robbed a bit against the pats - and this is coming from a Steelers fan.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Ravens fans got robbed a bit against the pats &#8211; and this is coming from a Steelers fan.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: darthseverus</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/01/22/league-defends-decision-not-to-review-evans-non-catch/#comment-1541324</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[darthseverus]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 23:04:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=181118#comment-1541324</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[First of all, I have seen many different replays of this, and I cannot say one way or the other if it was or was not a catch.  Depending on the angle you see it from, you could rule either way.  And on the field, it was incomplete.

Second, to overturn a call, there has to be indisputable video evidence to overturn the call.  Again, based on whichever angle you view, it can go either way.  With no indisputable evidence, you can&#039;t overturn the call.  Still incomplete.

Third, this wasn&#039;t the only play in the game.  What about the other 59 minutes and change where the Ravens offense and defense didn&#039;t do their jobs by making sure the Pats didn&#039;t score more points than them?  I don&#039;t hear anybody talking about that.

And for Steelers fans talking about the Ravens needing help, I&#039;ve got 3 items for you to think about:

1.  Watch the replay of the incomplete catch from the Super Bowl last year at the end of the game.  You clearly see Ben telling the ref they should have thrown a flag.  Looks like Ben needs the help here.

2.  In the Super Bowl vs. the Seahawks, Ben NEVER crossed the goal line and the ball never broke the plane.  But the refs gave him the TD anyhow.  Looks like Ben needed the help here.

3.  Same Super Bowl vs. the Seahawks, and Seattle is called for holding on a long completion.  Watch the replay, and there was no holding there.  Looks like the Steelers needed the help here.

So Steeler fans shouldn&#039;t talk about needing the help of the refs when the Steelers have clearly needed/wanted the help for every SB win they ever got (or didn&#039;t get).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First of all, I have seen many different replays of this, and I cannot say one way or the other if it was or was not a catch.  Depending on the angle you see it from, you could rule either way.  And on the field, it was incomplete.</p>
<p>Second, to overturn a call, there has to be indisputable video evidence to overturn the call.  Again, based on whichever angle you view, it can go either way.  With no indisputable evidence, you can&#8217;t overturn the call.  Still incomplete.</p>
<p>Third, this wasn&#8217;t the only play in the game.  What about the other 59 minutes and change where the Ravens offense and defense didn&#8217;t do their jobs by making sure the Pats didn&#8217;t score more points than them?  I don&#8217;t hear anybody talking about that.</p>
<p>And for Steelers fans talking about the Ravens needing help, I&#8217;ve got 3 items for you to think about:</p>
<p>1.  Watch the replay of the incomplete catch from the Super Bowl last year at the end of the game.  You clearly see Ben telling the ref they should have thrown a flag.  Looks like Ben needs the help here.</p>
<p>2.  In the Super Bowl vs. the Seahawks, Ben NEVER crossed the goal line and the ball never broke the plane.  But the refs gave him the TD anyhow.  Looks like Ben needed the help here.</p>
<p>3.  Same Super Bowl vs. the Seahawks, and Seattle is called for holding on a long completion.  Watch the replay, and there was no holding there.  Looks like the Steelers needed the help here.</p>
<p>So Steeler fans shouldn&#8217;t talk about needing the help of the refs when the Steelers have clearly needed/wanted the help for every SB win they ever got (or didn&#8217;t get).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: skittlesareyum</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/01/22/league-defends-decision-not-to-review-evans-non-catch/#comment-1540451</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[skittlesareyum]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 17:49:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=181118#comment-1540451</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;i&gt;yatista says: Jan 22, 2012 8:45 PM

Hate to bring it up again, but I will.

“If a player controls the ball while in the end zone, both feet, or any part of his body other than his hands, must be completely on the ground before losing control, or the pass is incomplete.”

Then why wasn’t it a TD for Johnson? I just watched it – the replay – again, three times. His feet were down, both of them, then he landed on his ass and THEN he put the ball down. Total possession all the way through. Still pissed.&lt;/i&gt;

It&#039;s because the definition of &quot;controls the ball&quot; requires a player going to the ground to maintain possession. The &quot;Calvin Johnson Rule&quot; is unrelated to the end zone because it applies anywhere. I think in the case of CJ&#039;s infamous catch it was applied too strictly, but the CJ Rule is not incompatible with the rule in the OP.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>yatista says: Jan 22, 2012 8:45 PM</p>
<p>Hate to bring it up again, but I will.</p>
<p>“If a player controls the ball while in the end zone, both feet, or any part of his body other than his hands, must be completely on the ground before losing control, or the pass is incomplete.”</p>
<p>Then why wasn’t it a TD for Johnson? I just watched it – the replay – again, three times. His feet were down, both of them, then he landed on his ass and THEN he put the ball down. Total possession all the way through. Still pissed.</i></p>
<p>It&#8217;s because the definition of &#8220;controls the ball&#8221; requires a player going to the ground to maintain possession. The &#8220;Calvin Johnson Rule&#8221; is unrelated to the end zone because it applies anywhere. I think in the case of CJ&#8217;s infamous catch it was applied too strictly, but the CJ Rule is not incompatible with the rule in the OP.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: me</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/01/22/league-defends-decision-not-to-review-evans-non-catch/#comment-1536510</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[me]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 06:07:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=181118#comment-1536510</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I wish I could attach the single frames I have of both angles showing the ball coming out of his hands before his left foot (he was spinning to the outside) hit the ground.  I&#039;m not sure where the controversy lies.  If he had held it for another half-second, touchdown.  He didn&#039;t, incomplete pass.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wish I could attach the single frames I have of both angles showing the ball coming out of his hands before his left foot (he was spinning to the outside) hit the ground.  I&#8217;m not sure where the controversy lies.  If he had held it for another half-second, touchdown.  He didn&#8217;t, incomplete pass.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: maximus929</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/01/22/league-defends-decision-not-to-review-evans-non-catch/#comment-1536214</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[maximus929]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 03:31:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=181118#comment-1536214</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yes. What would have been the harm of looking twice at a play that DETERMINED WHO&#039;S GOING TO THE SUPER BOWL?

Once again, the NFL gives the Patriots some help to get ahead.

Official can arrogantly say &quot;called incomplete, correctly, &quot; all they want. From the replays I saw, he had two feet down and possession. That&#039;s a touchdown.

So tell me why you couldn&#039;t at least look at such an important play? Isn&#039;t that the purpose of instant replay?

Oh I get it. The purpose of instant replay is to assist the Patriots to win as many SB&#039;s as we can give them. This is the second one they don&#039;t belong in.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes. What would have been the harm of looking twice at a play that DETERMINED WHO&#8217;S GOING TO THE SUPER BOWL?</p>
<p>Once again, the NFL gives the Patriots some help to get ahead.</p>
<p>Official can arrogantly say &#8220;called incomplete, correctly, &#8221; all they want. From the replays I saw, he had two feet down and possession. That&#8217;s a touchdown.</p>
<p>So tell me why you couldn&#8217;t at least look at such an important play? Isn&#8217;t that the purpose of instant replay?</p>
<p>Oh I get it. The purpose of instant replay is to assist the Patriots to win as many SB&#8217;s as we can give them. This is the second one they don&#8217;t belong in.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rarson</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/01/22/league-defends-decision-not-to-review-evans-non-catch/#comment-1535284</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[rarson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 21:21:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=181118#comment-1535284</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It looks like Evans almost had three feet down. He very nearly caught the ball before his left foot came up, and he definitely had his left foot back on the ground before the ball came loose.

However, it clearly wasn&#039;t a catch since his left foot wasn&#039;t &quot;completely on the ground&quot; at any point while he had control of the football. But that&#039;s tough to see in real time, so there should have been a review.

For those people who say &quot;It WAS reviewed&quot;, I thought the purpose of the review system was to give the referees a chance to verify or overturn a questionable call, not some guy sitting up in the booth. And doing reviews in this manner makes them completely transparent to the viewer, which also negates the point of having a review system at all.

But obviously, the point is that the NFL just wants to cram as many commercials into as little football as possible, as evidenced by how the clock never stopped when Flacco ran out of bounds. The NFL wants to hurry up and go to commercial, so they have to cut out stupid, unnecessary things like reviews and clock management.

Again, I&#039;m not complaining about the actual outcome of the game. It was a great game played well by both teams, with errors made on both sides of the ball on both teams. But the lack of quality and consistency in NFL officiating is terrible, and the NFL would rather make excuses than change things or even just admit that &quot;Yes, we should have had the guy on the field review it, just so that the viewers would actually know that it&#039;s being reviewed.&quot; Because if they had done that, then they wouldn&#039;t have to defend anything today.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It looks like Evans almost had three feet down. He very nearly caught the ball before his left foot came up, and he definitely had his left foot back on the ground before the ball came loose.</p>
<p>However, it clearly wasn&#8217;t a catch since his left foot wasn&#8217;t &#8220;completely on the ground&#8221; at any point while he had control of the football. But that&#8217;s tough to see in real time, so there should have been a review.</p>
<p>For those people who say &#8220;It WAS reviewed&#8221;, I thought the purpose of the review system was to give the referees a chance to verify or overturn a questionable call, not some guy sitting up in the booth. And doing reviews in this manner makes them completely transparent to the viewer, which also negates the point of having a review system at all.</p>
<p>But obviously, the point is that the NFL just wants to cram as many commercials into as little football as possible, as evidenced by how the clock never stopped when Flacco ran out of bounds. The NFL wants to hurry up and go to commercial, so they have to cut out stupid, unnecessary things like reviews and clock management.</p>
<p>Again, I&#8217;m not complaining about the actual outcome of the game. It was a great game played well by both teams, with errors made on both sides of the ball on both teams. But the lack of quality and consistency in NFL officiating is terrible, and the NFL would rather make excuses than change things or even just admit that &#8220;Yes, we should have had the guy on the field review it, just so that the viewers would actually know that it&#8217;s being reviewed.&#8221; Because if they had done that, then they wouldn&#8217;t have to defend anything today.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bunkmcnulty</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/01/22/league-defends-decision-not-to-review-evans-non-catch/#comment-1535245</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[bunkmcnulty]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 21:06:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=181118#comment-1535245</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@freddieizzyb 

Thank you.  That is a better tone.

The reason for the Pittsburgh games mention was to defend Joe Flacco (or is that Slacco?).  I thought you would have figured that out. I understand you don&#039;t like the Ravens, but the guy is better than you give him credit for. You act like he is Joe(y) Harrington. Flacco is more than just a servable QB.  And the guy throwing all the 3 yard passes yesterday was not wearing purple either. Joe did man up during the presser and say that he under threw Torrey. He was not perfect. I have seen Ben underthrow people occassionally also. And while Ben is a great QB, he is not perfect either.

Man, I get that you hate of the Ravens. I feel the same about the Steelers.  The difference is I have no issue admiring your players for what they do well. Even the hated Hines Ward.  In your initial comments all you were doing was bad mouthing Joe and Ravens fans.

I guess I don&#039;t think someone is a fan of this game unless you can be objective and fair.  Those that can&#039;t be are just &quot;homers.&quot; As for &quot;whiners&quot; about calls. Yes, even the Ravens fan base has a few misdirected souls that are dumb enough to complain about a missed call as an excuse. But so does EVERY team on these blogs. And frankly, the majority of the complaints I see are about Evans and Cundiff, and I think Ravens fans have a right to be upset with them. Yes, there are some that think Evans possessed that ball long enough for a TD (which he did not, IMHO).

Yes, it&#039;s a game. But dude, think a little more fairly in your comments. Maybe taking off the black and yellow glasses once in a while will help.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@freddieizzyb </p>
<p>Thank you.  That is a better tone.</p>
<p>The reason for the Pittsburgh games mention was to defend Joe Flacco (or is that Slacco?).  I thought you would have figured that out. I understand you don&#8217;t like the Ravens, but the guy is better than you give him credit for. You act like he is Joe(y) Harrington. Flacco is more than just a servable QB.  And the guy throwing all the 3 yard passes yesterday was not wearing purple either. Joe did man up during the presser and say that he under threw Torrey. He was not perfect. I have seen Ben underthrow people occassionally also. And while Ben is a great QB, he is not perfect either.</p>
<p>Man, I get that you hate of the Ravens. I feel the same about the Steelers.  The difference is I have no issue admiring your players for what they do well. Even the hated Hines Ward.  In your initial comments all you were doing was bad mouthing Joe and Ravens fans.</p>
<p>I guess I don&#8217;t think someone is a fan of this game unless you can be objective and fair.  Those that can&#8217;t be are just &#8220;homers.&#8221; As for &#8220;whiners&#8221; about calls. Yes, even the Ravens fan base has a few misdirected souls that are dumb enough to complain about a missed call as an excuse. But so does EVERY team on these blogs. And frankly, the majority of the complaints I see are about Evans and Cundiff, and I think Ravens fans have a right to be upset with them. Yes, there are some that think Evans possessed that ball long enough for a TD (which he did not, IMHO).</p>
<p>Yes, it&#8217;s a game. But dude, think a little more fairly in your comments. Maybe taking off the black and yellow glasses once in a while will help.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: horaceivory</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/01/22/league-defends-decision-not-to-review-evans-non-catch/#comment-1534896</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[horaceivory]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 19:23:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=181118#comment-1534896</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If that play happened in the field of play, would anyone think that Evans had caught the ball and been stripped resulting in a fumble?  Or would that be incomplete?   That&#039;s incomplete in the field of play everytime, and was correctly ruled incomplete in the endzone.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If that play happened in the field of play, would anyone think that Evans had caught the ball and been stripped resulting in a fumble?  Or would that be incomplete?   That&#8217;s incomplete in the field of play everytime, and was correctly ruled incomplete in the endzone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: freddieizzyb</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/01/22/league-defends-decision-not-to-review-evans-non-catch/#comment-1534681</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[freddieizzyb]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 18:33:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=181118#comment-1534681</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@bunkmcnulty

I am not speaking ill of others.  I just think its funny that the ravens fans are whining about refs.  Avtually, i was rooting for the ravens the last time they won the SB.  But seems like they have changed and think the &quot;deserve&quot; more respect than they get.  Yes, i will give it to you, they did beat us twice and Joe drove them right down the field in pittsburgh to beat us at the end. It was a great game for him and one of his best drives.  Not really sure what beating pittsburgh twice this year was part of your response.  Using your logic, Hey, the steelers beat new england this year.  That win got us as much as the ravens beating us twice, no where. I actually respect the ravens and have no reason to speak bad about other fans because i realize its just a game.  Again, its just irony that a team that can never just lose a game without 100 excuses, needs to make them when they dont get 1 call.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@bunkmcnulty</p>
<p>I am not speaking ill of others.  I just think its funny that the ravens fans are whining about refs.  Avtually, i was rooting for the ravens the last time they won the SB.  But seems like they have changed and think the &#8220;deserve&#8221; more respect than they get.  Yes, i will give it to you, they did beat us twice and Joe drove them right down the field in pittsburgh to beat us at the end. It was a great game for him and one of his best drives.  Not really sure what beating pittsburgh twice this year was part of your response.  Using your logic, Hey, the steelers beat new england this year.  That win got us as much as the ravens beating us twice, no where. I actually respect the ravens and have no reason to speak bad about other fans because i realize its just a game.  Again, its just irony that a team that can never just lose a game without 100 excuses, needs to make them when they dont get 1 call.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bunkmcnulty</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/01/22/league-defends-decision-not-to-review-evans-non-catch/#comment-1534535</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[bunkmcnulty]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 17:53:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=181118#comment-1534535</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@freddieizzyb

why be so vile?  so bitter?

Ben is a great QB.  And no, Flacco is not his equal. And Joe was far form perfect yesterday, but had a really good day? Why is it, many of you from Pittsburgh are incapable of being &quot;good sports?&quot;  Do they not teach you all to respect other people, teams, players, etc.

And really.  No Steeler fans whine about calls? Really? Last year when we lost I came out in this forum and said we had the game an blew it. We had no one to blame but ourselves.  As I have said before, bad calls are part of the game.  You get some.  You have some against you.  Everyone does!!!!

And every team has decent fans, who can respect the other teams and their fans, and then there are fans like you who nonsensically make statements about players and fans and have no real knowledge of the game.  Sorry your life is so terrible you need to speak ill of others to make yourself feel better. I feel sorry for you.  I do.

And last, the &quot;gane&quot; manager beat you all twice this year.   Sorry about that.  Maybe you&#039;ll do better next year.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@freddieizzyb</p>
<p>why be so vile?  so bitter?</p>
<p>Ben is a great QB.  And no, Flacco is not his equal. And Joe was far form perfect yesterday, but had a really good day? Why is it, many of you from Pittsburgh are incapable of being &#8220;good sports?&#8221;  Do they not teach you all to respect other people, teams, players, etc.</p>
<p>And really.  No Steeler fans whine about calls? Really? Last year when we lost I came out in this forum and said we had the game an blew it. We had no one to blame but ourselves.  As I have said before, bad calls are part of the game.  You get some.  You have some against you.  Everyone does!!!!</p>
<p>And every team has decent fans, who can respect the other teams and their fans, and then there are fans like you who nonsensically make statements about players and fans and have no real knowledge of the game.  Sorry your life is so terrible you need to speak ill of others to make yourself feel better. I feel sorry for you.  I do.</p>
<p>And last, the &#8220;gane&#8221; manager beat you all twice this year.   Sorry about that.  Maybe you&#8217;ll do better next year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bbgustaf</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/01/22/league-defends-decision-not-to-review-evans-non-catch/#comment-1534433</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[bbgustaf]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 17:39:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=181118#comment-1534433</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Okay, say they did botch the call (which I don&#039;t think they did), the Ravens STILL had a chance to tie it and go to overtime did they not? And what was the result? A missed 32 yard field goal!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okay, say they did botch the call (which I don&#8217;t think they did), the Ravens STILL had a chance to tie it and go to overtime did they not? And what was the result? A missed 32 yard field goal!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: apollofoucard</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/01/22/league-defends-decision-not-to-review-evans-non-catch/#comment-1534035</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[apollofoucard]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 16:07:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=181118#comment-1534035</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@snnyjcbs

You are retarded! Do you know nothing about how NFL scheduling works? Seriously? You said this same crap last week and I, as well as probably a dozen others, explained how NFL scheduling works. Before you spend all your time on a football site you might want to look into the basic stuff… like, say, how the schedule is determined. Idiot!

_________________________________
Amen!  He obviously didn&#039;t read the comments from his last dumbass post re. scheduling or maybe he wouldv&#039;e learned something.  He&#039;s either some idot kid, a monogoloid or someone who lives in their own fantasy world believing that ignorance really is bliss.
You trully know how to make an ass out of yourself snnyjcbs!!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@snnyjcbs</p>
<p>You are retarded! Do you know nothing about how NFL scheduling works? Seriously? You said this same crap last week and I, as well as probably a dozen others, explained how NFL scheduling works. Before you spend all your time on a football site you might want to look into the basic stuff… like, say, how the schedule is determined. Idiot!</p>
<p>_________________________________<br />
Amen!  He obviously didn&#8217;t read the comments from his last dumbass post re. scheduling or maybe he wouldv&#8217;e learned something.  He&#8217;s either some idot kid, a monogoloid or someone who lives in their own fantasy world believing that ignorance really is bliss.<br />
You trully know how to make an ass out of yourself snnyjcbs!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kate773</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/01/22/league-defends-decision-not-to-review-evans-non-catch/#comment-1533629</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[kate773]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 14:35:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=181118#comment-1533629</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[GG Eden says: 
Jan 23, 2012 6:47 AM 
Laughable to say “clearly” out before second foot down. In reality, “clearly” second foot down before ball came out.

If that had been Brady to Branch in the endzone, there would’ve been Gulf War-like mobilization of video reviews by the refs and the Pats awarded a TD. Just like that 2007 regular season game when Ben Watson bobbled the ball as he stepped out of bounds but was awarded a TD to give the Pats an undefeated regular season record.
___________________________

Interesting that all you people crying about how if this were the Pats they would have been awarded a TD aren&#039;t discussing the TD BY BRADY HIMSELF that was reversed upon review.  However, that doesn&#039;t suit your argument so its easier to just blow past it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>GG Eden says:<br />
Jan 23, 2012 6:47 AM<br />
Laughable to say “clearly” out before second foot down. In reality, “clearly” second foot down before ball came out.</p>
<p>If that had been Brady to Branch in the endzone, there would’ve been Gulf War-like mobilization of video reviews by the refs and the Pats awarded a TD. Just like that 2007 regular season game when Ben Watson bobbled the ball as he stepped out of bounds but was awarded a TD to give the Pats an undefeated regular season record.<br />
___________________________</p>
<p>Interesting that all you people crying about how if this were the Pats they would have been awarded a TD aren&#8217;t discussing the TD BY BRADY HIMSELF that was reversed upon review.  However, that doesn&#8217;t suit your argument so its easier to just blow past it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: freddieizzyb</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/01/22/league-defends-decision-not-to-review-evans-non-catch/#comment-1533589</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[freddieizzyb]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 14:25:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=181118#comment-1533589</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Funny, the steelers beat the ravens and all their fans say it was the refs who helped them win. Now, they lose a game and they want the refs help? What? They were lucky that they caught the Pats sleeping, or that game wouldnt have been close. Maybe if SLACCO had a qb arm, he would have hit that WIDE OPEN receiver on the bootleg in stride like Big BEN would have hit wallace. Instead, the receiver had to make a diving catch and they settled for 3. Stop acting like 1 play decided 60 minutes  Now they are asking why a penalty was not called when players took their helmuts off to celebrate that choker kicker missing basacally an extra point?  What&lt; refs help again?  hahahaha .  I know, but flacco played a &quot;GREAT&quot; game?  really?  i guess his stats say he did.  He had all 3 yd passes where the receiver than ran 20 plus yards.  Yea great qb.  Maybe a running a half yard to get the 1st down might have changewd things, maybe hitting the reciever on the bootleg would have.  He threw that INT in the 4th, if the D didnt bail him out AGAIN, all of baltimore would be calling for his head.  He is what he is, a 2nd level qb, a gane manager.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Funny, the steelers beat the ravens and all their fans say it was the refs who helped them win. Now, they lose a game and they want the refs help? What? They were lucky that they caught the Pats sleeping, or that game wouldnt have been close. Maybe if SLACCO had a qb arm, he would have hit that WIDE OPEN receiver on the bootleg in stride like Big BEN would have hit wallace. Instead, the receiver had to make a diving catch and they settled for 3. Stop acting like 1 play decided 60 minutes  Now they are asking why a penalty was not called when players took their helmuts off to celebrate that choker kicker missing basacally an extra point?  What&lt; refs help again?  hahahaha .  I know, but flacco played a &quot;GREAT&quot; game?  really?  i guess his stats say he did.  He had all 3 yd passes where the receiver than ran 20 plus yards.  Yea great qb.  Maybe a running a half yard to get the 1st down might have changewd things, maybe hitting the reciever on the bootleg would have.  He threw that INT in the 4th, if the D didnt bail him out AGAIN, all of baltimore would be calling for his head.  He is what he is, a 2nd level qb, a gane manager.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sjhesketh</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/01/22/league-defends-decision-not-to-review-evans-non-catch/#comment-1533552</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[sjhesketh]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 14:17:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=181118#comment-1533552</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How about giving Sterling Moore a whole bench of credit for knocking the ball free? Evans is taking a lot of heat here, but without Moore&#039;s refusal to give up on the play Evans hangs onto the ball. Moore made two studly defensive plays at the very end of the game to force the Ravens to try the FG.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How about giving Sterling Moore a whole bench of credit for knocking the ball free? Evans is taking a lot of heat here, but without Moore&#8217;s refusal to give up on the play Evans hangs onto the ball. Moore made two studly defensive plays at the very end of the game to force the Ravens to try the FG.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: contract</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/01/22/league-defends-decision-not-to-review-evans-non-catch/#comment-1533459</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[contract]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 13:46:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=181118#comment-1533459</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[That was a HUGE play with a trip to the Super Bowl on the line. If you&#039;re not going to use replay in that situation, then it should get scrapped altogether.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That was a HUGE play with a trip to the Super Bowl on the line. If you&#8217;re not going to use replay in that situation, then it should get scrapped altogether.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jimmymcnultysbottleofjameson</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/01/22/league-defends-decision-not-to-review-evans-non-catch/#comment-1533418</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jimmymcnultysbottleofjameson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 13:29:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=181118#comment-1533418</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sorry Lee but you blew it and you blew it big time.  With the exception of Pitta and Boldin, Flacco gets absolutely no help from his receivers, it&#039;s sad.  Flacco played a great game and the pass to Lee couldn&#039;t have been any better.  We were set up to win the game and it was nothing but pure and utter choking at its finest.  Just stepped out to walk my dog, Bmore is ghost town right now.. this one will sting for a long time.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry Lee but you blew it and you blew it big time.  With the exception of Pitta and Boldin, Flacco gets absolutely no help from his receivers, it&#8217;s sad.  Flacco played a great game and the pass to Lee couldn&#8217;t have been any better.  We were set up to win the game and it was nothing but pure and utter choking at its finest.  Just stepped out to walk my dog, Bmore is ghost town right now.. this one will sting for a long time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: har21441</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/01/22/league-defends-decision-not-to-review-evans-non-catch/#comment-1533252</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[har21441]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 12:07:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=181118#comment-1533252</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Doesn&#039;t Evans reaction say everything?  Not a single word of protest - just meekly running back to the huddle - like a guy that just dropped the game winning touchdown.  Not piling on here, but you&#039;d think he&#039;d have a stronger reaction if he thought he made the catch.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Doesn&#8217;t Evans reaction say everything?  Not a single word of protest &#8211; just meekly running back to the huddle &#8211; like a guy that just dropped the game winning touchdown.  Not piling on here, but you&#8217;d think he&#8217;d have a stronger reaction if he thought he made the catch.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GG Eden</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/01/22/league-defends-decision-not-to-review-evans-non-catch/#comment-1533229</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[GG Eden]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 11:47:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=181118#comment-1533229</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Laughable to say &quot;clearly&quot; out before second foot down. In reality, &quot;clearly&quot; second foot down before ball came out.

If that had been Brady to Branch in the endzone, there would&#039;ve been Gulf War-like mobilization of video reviews by the refs and the Pats awarded a TD. Just like that 2007 regular season game when Ben Watson bobbled the ball as he stepped out of bounds but was awarded a TD to give the Pats an undefeated regular season record.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Laughable to say &#8220;clearly&#8221; out before second foot down. In reality, &#8220;clearly&#8221; second foot down before ball came out.</p>
<p>If that had been Brady to Branch in the endzone, there would&#8217;ve been Gulf War-like mobilization of video reviews by the refs and the Pats awarded a TD. Just like that 2007 regular season game when Ben Watson bobbled the ball as he stepped out of bounds but was awarded a TD to give the Pats an undefeated regular season record.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: flakazoid</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/01/22/league-defends-decision-not-to-review-evans-non-catch/#comment-1533224</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[flakazoid]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 11:43:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=181118#comment-1533224</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[THEY DID REVIEW IT!
Up in the booth. It was just so obviously a non-catch that it didn&#039;t take long enough to stop the game. SHEESH! Some of you are so THICK!

But I guess it wouldn&#039;t be a Ravens loss without a little whining from about the officials.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>THEY DID REVIEW IT!<br />
Up in the booth. It was just so obviously a non-catch that it didn&#8217;t take long enough to stop the game. SHEESH! Some of you are so THICK!</p>
<p>But I guess it wouldn&#8217;t be a Ravens loss without a little whining from about the officials.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: juststeel</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/01/22/league-defends-decision-not-to-review-evans-non-catch/#comment-1533215</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[juststeel]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 11:24:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=181118#comment-1533215</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I thought the Ravens won the SB when they beat the Steelers.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought the Ravens won the SB when they beat the Steelers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bullcharger</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/01/22/league-defends-decision-not-to-review-evans-non-catch/#comment-1533196</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[bullcharger]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 10:22:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=181118#comment-1533196</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What are you guys talking about?  The league says it wasn&#039;t a catch.  Your own expert says it wasn&#039;t a catch.  Any on field review would have confirmed it.  Any time they got the call right you can&#039;t say they should have reviewed it on field.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What are you guys talking about?  The league says it wasn&#8217;t a catch.  Your own expert says it wasn&#8217;t a catch.  Any on field review would have confirmed it.  Any time they got the call right you can&#8217;t say they should have reviewed it on field.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: monropoobah</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/01/22/league-defends-decision-not-to-review-evans-non-catch/#comment-1533186</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[monropoobah]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 09:45:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=181118#comment-1533186</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[pats hater. evans clearly had posession and i couldn&#039;t believe they weren&#039;t calling that a touchdown.  seemed like the same concept as &#039;breaking the plane&#039; for a runner. wasn&#039;t aware the two feet down thing applied. if that&#039;s the rule then &#039;it is what it is&#039; because he did not have two feet down before the ball came out.
i guess the best i get to say is god bless the ravens for almost beating the pats.
god bless the giants]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>pats hater. evans clearly had posession and i couldn&#8217;t believe they weren&#8217;t calling that a touchdown.  seemed like the same concept as &#8216;breaking the plane&#8217; for a runner. wasn&#8217;t aware the two feet down thing applied. if that&#8217;s the rule then &#8216;it is what it is&#8217; because he did not have two feet down before the ball came out.<br />
i guess the best i get to say is god bless the ravens for almost beating the pats.<br />
god bless the giants</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: smokeya</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/01/22/league-defends-decision-not-to-review-evans-non-catch/#comment-1533185</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[smokeya]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 09:45:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=181118#comment-1533185</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Best thing is that NOONE can say flacco can&#039;t carry a team to the SB now. Dropped pass and missed FG is, and can never be, his fault]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Best thing is that NOONE can say flacco can&#8217;t carry a team to the SB now. Dropped pass and missed FG is, and can never be, his fault</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
