<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Jim Harbaugh compares Bradshaw non-fumble to tuck rule</title>
	<atom:link href="http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/01/23/jim-harbaugh-compares-bradshaw-non-fumble-to-tuck-rule/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/01/23/jim-harbaugh-compares-bradshaw-non-fumble-to-tuck-rule/</link>
	<description>ProFootballTalk on NBCSports.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 26 May 2013 04:24:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: patfan1951</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/01/23/jim-harbaugh-compares-bradshaw-non-fumble-to-tuck-rule/#comment-1546027</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[patfan1951]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jan 2012 02:07:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=181427#comment-1546027</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You all lose sight of the fact that the referees are human. All calls are judgement calls.....some are obvious.....others less so.  The referees are like judges in a courtroom......we may not always agree with the &#039;verdict&#039;, but we must accept the referee&#039;s decision. They are the ones charged with calling the game. They don&#039;t always get the calls right, but instant replay in most cases show the calls were correct.

It sucks to lose a game because of a questionable call, but that&#039;s just part of the game. Coaches need to understand this and stop blaming the officials for their team&#039;s defeat.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You all lose sight of the fact that the referees are human. All calls are judgement calls&#8230;..some are obvious&#8230;..others less so.  The referees are like judges in a courtroom&#8230;&#8230;we may not always agree with the &#8216;verdict&#8217;, but we must accept the referee&#8217;s decision. They are the ones charged with calling the game. They don&#8217;t always get the calls right, but instant replay in most cases show the calls were correct.</p>
<p>It sucks to lose a game because of a questionable call, but that&#8217;s just part of the game. Coaches need to understand this and stop blaming the officials for their team&#8217;s defeat.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: myspaceyourface</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/01/23/jim-harbaugh-compares-bradshaw-non-fumble-to-tuck-rule/#comment-1545925</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[myspaceyourface]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jan 2012 00:43:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=181427#comment-1545925</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This first family of football are a bunch of cry babies.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This first family of football are a bunch of cry babies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: q4william</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/01/23/jim-harbaugh-compares-bradshaw-non-fumble-to-tuck-rule/#comment-1542064</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[q4william]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 14:44:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=181427#comment-1542064</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Technically, it&#039;s the correct call. But, like the tuck rule, it never got called in other games. I&#039;ve never seen a fumble overturned because forward progress has been stopped. 

When a rule gets applied inconsistently, like the tuck rule was, and only in a championship game, it detracts from the game. 

I have no dog in this hunt, being from Denver, but Harbaugh has a point. If the refs can point to 10 such calls made a year, he needs to shut up. But if a rule gets invoked only once a year, in a championship game, then he has a legitimate beef. Don&#039;t tell me this was the only time all year the ball came out after forward progress was stopped. Or that in 2001, that tackle by the Raiders was the only time all year the ball got tucked. The Raiders got hosed on that call (and I&#039;m a Raider hater) simply because of the inconsistency and randomness of invoking the rule. 

But, as someone pointed out above, the 49ers lost the game because of other plays, not this one. As Marty Schottenheimer famously said when asked about his Superbowl record: it is what it is. Suck it up and use it for motivation to play smart special teams and be up by three touchdowns next year. Then bad calls won&#039;t affect you.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Technically, it&#8217;s the correct call. But, like the tuck rule, it never got called in other games. I&#8217;ve never seen a fumble overturned because forward progress has been stopped. </p>
<p>When a rule gets applied inconsistently, like the tuck rule was, and only in a championship game, it detracts from the game. </p>
<p>I have no dog in this hunt, being from Denver, but Harbaugh has a point. If the refs can point to 10 such calls made a year, he needs to shut up. But if a rule gets invoked only once a year, in a championship game, then he has a legitimate beef. Don&#8217;t tell me this was the only time all year the ball came out after forward progress was stopped. Or that in 2001, that tackle by the Raiders was the only time all year the ball got tucked. The Raiders got hosed on that call (and I&#8217;m a Raider hater) simply because of the inconsistency and randomness of invoking the rule. </p>
<p>But, as someone pointed out above, the 49ers lost the game because of other plays, not this one. As Marty Schottenheimer famously said when asked about his Superbowl record: it is what it is. Suck it up and use it for motivation to play smart special teams and be up by three touchdowns next year. Then bad calls won&#8217;t affect you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rock90210</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/01/23/jim-harbaugh-compares-bradshaw-non-fumble-to-tuck-rule/#comment-1541827</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[rock90210]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 11:10:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=181427#comment-1541827</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You should put a disclaimer on this blog that states most of your commenters are from New York and thus HATE JIM HARBAUGH.  Seriously, the nonsensical diatribe from most of youse is pathetic (and I grew up there).  Harbaugh is the man and has done a great job with the 49&#039;ers and his attitude has a lot to do with it.  My only criticism is that I would have pulled that PR after his first ridiculous mistake.  But he&#039;s a players coach and he stayed with him.  As for the fumble - I sort of thought it was the right call - but I have seen it called (as all of you have) alot different in many games.  So hey NY (and I like the Giants and Coughlin - very impressed with what he&#039;s done and I am rooting for them in the SP ) but get the F off Harbaugh&#039;s back --There are 30 NFL teams that would love this guy be their coach.  Your negativity is pathetic.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You should put a disclaimer on this blog that states most of your commenters are from New York and thus HATE JIM HARBAUGH.  Seriously, the nonsensical diatribe from most of youse is pathetic (and I grew up there).  Harbaugh is the man and has done a great job with the 49&#8242;ers and his attitude has a lot to do with it.  My only criticism is that I would have pulled that PR after his first ridiculous mistake.  But he&#8217;s a players coach and he stayed with him.  As for the fumble &#8211; I sort of thought it was the right call &#8211; but I have seen it called (as all of you have) alot different in many games.  So hey NY (and I like the Giants and Coughlin &#8211; very impressed with what he&#8217;s done and I am rooting for them in the SP ) but get the F off Harbaugh&#8217;s back &#8211;There are 30 NFL teams that would love this guy be their coach.  Your negativity is pathetic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: garyrocktown</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/01/23/jim-harbaugh-compares-bradshaw-non-fumble-to-tuck-rule/#comment-1541773</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[garyrocktown]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 05:31:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=181427#comment-1541773</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You all know the Niners were the better team and Giants got lucky. 19 million fans in NY of course your opinions are biased. You cried like babies last time the Niners took NY out of the playoffs, now you all talk crap. I will take the Niners every time and will come out on top most every time, and if you don&#039;t like that, oh well..]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You all know the Niners were the better team and Giants got lucky. 19 million fans in NY of course your opinions are biased. You cried like babies last time the Niners took NY out of the playoffs, now you all talk crap. I will take the Niners every time and will come out on top most every time, and if you don&#8217;t like that, oh well..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: themonster49</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/01/23/jim-harbaugh-compares-bradshaw-non-fumble-to-tuck-rule/#comment-1541717</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[themonster49]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 04:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=181427#comment-1541717</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Correct me if i am wrong.

The reason forward progress plays are allowed to finish before a whistle is blown is because to assume the player is going all the way down when the player may have plans to recover and try to make a play would remove the purpose of letting plays run to a conclusion througout the game, which is to allow the players a chance to make plays. It has nothing to do with fumbles.

Times when whistles are blown early: When a player physically, as in physics, cannot go to the ground to end the play due to solid masses, as in other players, keeping the ball-carrier standing upright.

The early whistle in question goes against the practices and purposes of the early whistle usage.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Correct me if i am wrong.</p>
<p>The reason forward progress plays are allowed to finish before a whistle is blown is because to assume the player is going all the way down when the player may have plans to recover and try to make a play would remove the purpose of letting plays run to a conclusion througout the game, which is to allow the players a chance to make plays. It has nothing to do with fumbles.</p>
<p>Times when whistles are blown early: When a player physically, as in physics, cannot go to the ground to end the play due to solid masses, as in other players, keeping the ball-carrier standing upright.</p>
<p>The early whistle in question goes against the practices and purposes of the early whistle usage.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gpete1962</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/01/23/jim-harbaugh-compares-bradshaw-non-fumble-to-tuck-rule/#comment-1541686</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[gpete1962]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 03:40:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=181427#comment-1541686</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[jarrman46 says: Jan 23, 2012 11:02 PM

And in 1998 wild card game the Green Bay Packers were robbed on a Jerry Rice fumble that lead to TOs touchdown pass 2 plays later. That call was 10 times worse. The bottom line is the whistle blew before the Giants RB fumbled.
====================================

Even worse than that was the 03 49er Giant playoff  game when Sueburt was an eligible receiver  who was tackled on the goal line before the ball got there.

No pass interference call was made and the game ended with no explanation ending the Giant season.

the next day the league actually apologized for the  non call]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>jarrman46 says: Jan 23, 2012 11:02 PM</p>
<p>And in 1998 wild card game the Green Bay Packers were robbed on a Jerry Rice fumble that lead to TOs touchdown pass 2 plays later. That call was 10 times worse. The bottom line is the whistle blew before the Giants RB fumbled.<br />
====================================</p>
<p>Even worse than that was the 03 49er Giant playoff  game when Sueburt was an eligible receiver  who was tackled on the goal line before the ball got there.</p>
<p>No pass interference call was made and the game ended with no explanation ending the Giant season.</p>
<p>the next day the league actually apologized for the  non call</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: georgebrett</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/01/23/jim-harbaugh-compares-bradshaw-non-fumble-to-tuck-rule/#comment-1540585</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[georgebrett]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 18:40:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=181427#comment-1540585</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[sf49ers4,

go ahead and compare, and while you are comparing see whether the runner is face down or face up. When face up or falling backwards the refs blow the whistle. Also, just because the whistle doesn&#039;t sound as soon as it should have does not mean the ref didn&#039;t see it right. It was 3 full yards from the forward progress till the ball came loose. The most important part of any play or call is that they get it right, and in this case it is 100% no question they got it right.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>sf49ers4,</p>
<p>go ahead and compare, and while you are comparing see whether the runner is face down or face up. When face up or falling backwards the refs blow the whistle. Also, just because the whistle doesn&#8217;t sound as soon as it should have does not mean the ref didn&#8217;t see it right. It was 3 full yards from the forward progress till the ball came loose. The most important part of any play or call is that they get it right, and in this case it is 100% no question they got it right.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: corrente56</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/01/23/jim-harbaugh-compares-bradshaw-non-fumble-to-tuck-rule/#comment-1540527</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[corrente56]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 18:20:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=181427#comment-1540527</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[i can not stand jim harbaugh..]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i can not stand jim harbaugh..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sf49ers4</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/01/23/jim-harbaugh-compares-bradshaw-non-fumble-to-tuck-rule/#comment-1540375</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[sf49ers4]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 17:27:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=181427#comment-1540375</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Watch the play again!

Bradshaw falls on top of Tramaine Brock and is still in a position to get up and run as you&#039;ve seen many times in other games.  If he held onto the ball, he could&#039;ve gotten up and run.  Therefore, since he fumbled, the play should&#039;ve continued and the 49ers should&#039;ve gotten the ball.  There was no reason for the Ref to blow the whistle that early.  Compare all other plays similar to that and you will not see the Refs blow the whistle like that.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Watch the play again!</p>
<p>Bradshaw falls on top of Tramaine Brock and is still in a position to get up and run as you&#8217;ve seen many times in other games.  If he held onto the ball, he could&#8217;ve gotten up and run.  Therefore, since he fumbled, the play should&#8217;ve continued and the 49ers should&#8217;ve gotten the ball.  There was no reason for the Ref to blow the whistle that early.  Compare all other plays similar to that and you will not see the Refs blow the whistle like that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: contract</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/01/23/jim-harbaugh-compares-bradshaw-non-fumble-to-tuck-rule/#comment-1540255</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[contract]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 16:56:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=181427#comment-1540255</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Any comparison to the tuck rule aside ... that was an awfully quick whistle.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Any comparison to the tuck rule aside &#8230; that was an awfully quick whistle.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: edavidberg</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/01/23/jim-harbaugh-compares-bradshaw-non-fumble-to-tuck-rule/#comment-1539998</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[edavidberg]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 15:37:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=181427#comment-1539998</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I don&#039;t care what the rule is so long as they are consistent.  I haven&#039;t seen a ref blow the whistle that quick all year, and I HAVE seen a number of fumbles after the runner was pushed backwards.  You can&#039;t say something is the right call if its inconsistent with the way plays were called the entire year.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t care what the rule is so long as they are consistent.  I haven&#8217;t seen a ref blow the whistle that quick all year, and I HAVE seen a number of fumbles after the runner was pushed backwards.  You can&#8217;t say something is the right call if its inconsistent with the way plays were called the entire year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hikohadon</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/01/23/jim-harbaugh-compares-bradshaw-non-fumble-to-tuck-rule/#comment-1539833</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[hikohadon]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 14:49:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=181427#comment-1539833</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;There is an East Coast bias in football. The League didn’t want the upstart 49ers in the S.B. and got the match up they wanted. Harbaugh is laying the ground work for next year and bringing up the so called “tuck rule” is no accident. It seems that this is ,once again, a clear example of another bogus call to get another East coast team in the big game.&quot;
____________

I can clearly support the complaints about the Tuck Rule - like Calvin Johnson&#039;s non-TD last season, the eyes can tell you what the verdict really should have been.

But this?  A play where forward progress is clearly stopped and the whistle has already blown?  A play that happens 4 or 5 times every game?  You gotta stop taking crybaby lessons from Harbaugh.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;There is an East Coast bias in football. The League didn’t want the upstart 49ers in the S.B. and got the match up they wanted. Harbaugh is laying the ground work for next year and bringing up the so called “tuck rule” is no accident. It seems that this is ,once again, a clear example of another bogus call to get another East coast team in the big game.&#8221;<br />
____________</p>
<p>I can clearly support the complaints about the Tuck Rule &#8211; like Calvin Johnson&#8217;s non-TD last season, the eyes can tell you what the verdict really should have been.</p>
<p>But this?  A play where forward progress is clearly stopped and the whistle has already blown?  A play that happens 4 or 5 times every game?  You gotta stop taking crybaby lessons from Harbaugh.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: killitandeatit</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/01/23/jim-harbaugh-compares-bradshaw-non-fumble-to-tuck-rule/#comment-1539233</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[killitandeatit]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 02:46:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=181427#comment-1539233</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There is an East Coast bias in football. The League didn&#039;t want the upstart 49ers in the S.B. and got the match up they wanted. Harbaugh is laying the ground work for next year and bringing up the so called &quot;tuck rule&quot; is no accident. It seems that this is ,once again, a clear example of another bogus call to get another East coast team in the big game. 

A few more examples: This year&#039;s Heisman,the Stealers/Sea Hawks S.B. The Immaculate Reception,every college football poll for the last 20 years .]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is an East Coast bias in football. The League didn&#8217;t want the upstart 49ers in the S.B. and got the match up they wanted. Harbaugh is laying the ground work for next year and bringing up the so called &#8220;tuck rule&#8221; is no accident. It seems that this is ,once again, a clear example of another bogus call to get another East coast team in the big game. </p>
<p>A few more examples: This year&#8217;s Heisman,the Stealers/Sea Hawks S.B. The Immaculate Reception,every college football poll for the last 20 years .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: situsavaisprier</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/01/23/jim-harbaugh-compares-bradshaw-non-fumble-to-tuck-rule/#comment-1538885</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[situsavaisprier]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 00:46:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=181427#comment-1538885</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think it was the correct call. Bradshaw was wrapped up and was being pulled backwards after his 5-6 yard gain. He was almost about to be sitting on a 49er defender and he had absolutely no chance of getting out of that. Right now they are pretty much heavily emphasizing player safety. Even if the whistle was a quick one, it was intended to stop the play and to stop the need to put the ball carrier on the ground. 

Had this been the NFL a few years ago then this would have been a fumble IMO, and that wouldn&#039;t have been challengeable. 

That being said, This didn&#039;t decide the game. This would have given the 49ers the ball in Giants territory, and given the way they didn&#039;t convert a 3rd down all game and still couldn&#039;t (I don&#039;t really count their only one since that was against a Prevent defense) it would have resulted in a quick field goal and the Giants would have needed one to tie. This was before the 2 minute warning and the Giants had 2 timeouts.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it was the correct call. Bradshaw was wrapped up and was being pulled backwards after his 5-6 yard gain. He was almost about to be sitting on a 49er defender and he had absolutely no chance of getting out of that. Right now they are pretty much heavily emphasizing player safety. Even if the whistle was a quick one, it was intended to stop the play and to stop the need to put the ball carrier on the ground. </p>
<p>Had this been the NFL a few years ago then this would have been a fumble IMO, and that wouldn&#8217;t have been challengeable. </p>
<p>That being said, This didn&#8217;t decide the game. This would have given the 49ers the ball in Giants territory, and given the way they didn&#8217;t convert a 3rd down all game and still couldn&#8217;t (I don&#8217;t really count their only one since that was against a Prevent defense) it would have resulted in a quick field goal and the Giants would have needed one to tie. This was before the 2 minute warning and the Giants had 2 timeouts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: drmichaelstevenlee</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/01/23/jim-harbaugh-compares-bradshaw-non-fumble-to-tuck-rule/#comment-1538420</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[drmichaelstevenlee]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 21:41:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=181427#comment-1538420</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think it&#039;s a close call for a ref to make, but that it was ultimately the right call. 
The ref, imo, is giving the forward progress to the player not just as a runner but as a pass catcher with the play being essentially bang bang. Yes it protects the runner, yes it was a quick forward progress, but these refs have to make close calls. 
So its the right call because the ref called it that way.

Harbaugh is just an emotional coach and can&#039;t get over the fact that if you don&#039;t win the big one your team isn&#039;t the best that year. Still Coach of the Year imo, Kubiak had a lot of help from Phillips, how come no COY love for my man Starvin Marvin LEwis? Bengals had a great season]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it&#8217;s a close call for a ref to make, but that it was ultimately the right call.<br />
The ref, imo, is giving the forward progress to the player not just as a runner but as a pass catcher with the play being essentially bang bang. Yes it protects the runner, yes it was a quick forward progress, but these refs have to make close calls.<br />
So its the right call because the ref called it that way.</p>
<p>Harbaugh is just an emotional coach and can&#8217;t get over the fact that if you don&#8217;t win the big one your team isn&#8217;t the best that year. Still Coach of the Year imo, Kubiak had a lot of help from Phillips, how come no COY love for my man Starvin Marvin LEwis? Bengals had a great season</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eezyxyz</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/01/23/jim-harbaugh-compares-bradshaw-non-fumble-to-tuck-rule/#comment-1538281</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[eezyxyz]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 21:05:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=181427#comment-1538281</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;.....after teammate Quentin Coryatt failed to secure a pass from Steelers quarterback Neil O’Donnell that hit Coryatt right in the stomach&quot;

That&#039;s not really true.  Steelers WR Ernie Mills realized that Coryatt had undercut his slant route and reached a hand in to knock the ball out and prevent the INT.  It was a great play by a WR turning defender to prevent a turnover, and Mills should get credit for the play.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;&#8230;..after teammate Quentin Coryatt failed to secure a pass from Steelers quarterback Neil O’Donnell that hit Coryatt right in the stomach&#8221;</p>
<p>That&#8217;s not really true.  Steelers WR Ernie Mills realized that Coryatt had undercut his slant route and reached a hand in to knock the ball out and prevent the INT.  It was a great play by a WR turning defender to prevent a turnover, and Mills should get credit for the play.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: blu4l1fe</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/01/23/jim-harbaugh-compares-bradshaw-non-fumble-to-tuck-rule/#comment-1538135</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[blu4l1fe]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 20:34:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=181427#comment-1538135</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[go49ers says: Jan 24, 2012 3:20 AM

If I may…I’ll give it to the “Wilcard” NY Giants. They found a way to win. Let me emphasize “A – way – to – win”. Yes your team clearly won if it wasn’t for our costly fumble by Kyle Williams &amp; that blown (non fumble Bradshaw) call by the ref. Our Defense dominated your Offense. Yeah, I’m whining ~ whatever.

Let’s just say I wouldn’t be mad if we lost to a good team who deserved to win.

Good luck in your “East Coast Bias” S.B. because your gonna need it.

There’s your “class” -

----------------------------------------

Just one thing, and we&#039;ll stick with facts, which is on the record books rather than your ASSumptious opinion.  If the 9ers defense dominated the game, first, the Giants had a higher score, and therefore won, and second, that thing with the 9ers converting 1-13 on third down.  Don&#039;t get me wrong here, the 9ers defense played great, but I would assert the Giants defense did a better job.

And you can say whatever you want and &quot;not being mad if you&#039;d lost to a good team that deserved to win it.&quot;  FACT IS---in the end of it all, bottomline, the Giants (a wildcard team) beat the 49ers (a division champ) in Candlestick Park (their home turf) to win the NFC Championship.  

Sorry, now take another sip of that drink that affects peoples judgements called WHINE!!!!!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>go49ers says: Jan 24, 2012 3:20 AM</p>
<p>If I may…I’ll give it to the “Wilcard” NY Giants. They found a way to win. Let me emphasize “A – way – to – win”. Yes your team clearly won if it wasn’t for our costly fumble by Kyle Williams &amp; that blown (non fumble Bradshaw) call by the ref. Our Defense dominated your Offense. Yeah, I’m whining ~ whatever.</p>
<p>Let’s just say I wouldn’t be mad if we lost to a good team who deserved to win.</p>
<p>Good luck in your “East Coast Bias” S.B. because your gonna need it.</p>
<p>There’s your “class” -</p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-</p>
<p>Just one thing, and we&#8217;ll stick with facts, which is on the record books rather than your ASSumptious opinion.  If the 9ers defense dominated the game, first, the Giants had a higher score, and therefore won, and second, that thing with the 9ers converting 1-13 on third down.  Don&#8217;t get me wrong here, the 9ers defense played great, but I would assert the Giants defense did a better job.</p>
<p>And you can say whatever you want and &#8220;not being mad if you&#8217;d lost to a good team that deserved to win it.&#8221;  FACT IS&#8212;in the end of it all, bottomline, the Giants (a wildcard team) beat the 49ers (a division champ) in Candlestick Park (their home turf) to win the NFC Championship.  </p>
<p>Sorry, now take another sip of that drink that affects peoples judgements called WHINE!!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: brawil45</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/01/23/jim-harbaugh-compares-bradshaw-non-fumble-to-tuck-rule/#comment-1538070</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[brawil45]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 20:10:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=181427#comment-1538070</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[All you Niners fans claiming an East Coast bias need to check your history.  

The last time these teams met in the playoffs, in the same stadium, the game ended on a blown call that cost the Giants a second chance at a game-winning FG.  

The call (based on a misunderstanding about which Giants linemen were eligible receivers on the play) was so blatantly wrong that the NFL admitted that it was a blown call the next day.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All you Niners fans claiming an East Coast bias need to check your history.  </p>
<p>The last time these teams met in the playoffs, in the same stadium, the game ended on a blown call that cost the Giants a second chance at a game-winning FG.  </p>
<p>The call (based on a misunderstanding about which Giants linemen were eligible receivers on the play) was so blatantly wrong that the NFL admitted that it was a blown call the next day.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: georgebrett</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/01/23/jim-harbaugh-compares-bradshaw-non-fumble-to-tuck-rule/#comment-1537975</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[georgebrett]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 19:46:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=181427#comment-1537975</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[sdb0ltz,

you said Bradshaw was still fighting for yards?

LOL

I think you should watch the play again because it&#039;s tough to fight for more yards when you&#039;re being drug backwards in the fetal position with your feet off the ground.

Or maybe you were at an arena football game]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>sdb0ltz,</p>
<p>you said Bradshaw was still fighting for yards?</p>
<p>LOL</p>
<p>I think you should watch the play again because it&#8217;s tough to fight for more yards when you&#8217;re being drug backwards in the fetal position with your feet off the ground.</p>
<p>Or maybe you were at an arena football game</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vinny92</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/01/23/jim-harbaugh-compares-bradshaw-non-fumble-to-tuck-rule/#comment-1537941</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[vinny92]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 19:38:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=181427#comment-1537941</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[i just watched the play numerous times and it is clear that the ball is out before the whistle..as per the call, i dont think it was the right call...bradshaw breaks through the first tackle, continues to go forward, then he is hit and brought down with the ball popping out

the whole game the refs did not blow the whistle that fast and there were other times where they let the play continue]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i just watched the play numerous times and it is clear that the ball is out before the whistle..as per the call, i dont think it was the right call&#8230;bradshaw breaks through the first tackle, continues to go forward, then he is hit and brought down with the ball popping out</p>
<p>the whole game the refs did not blow the whistle that fast and there were other times where they let the play continue</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: georgebrett</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/01/23/jim-harbaugh-compares-bradshaw-non-fumble-to-tuck-rule/#comment-1537921</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[georgebrett]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 19:31:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=181427#comment-1537921</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[lawrencejnc,,

Barry Sanders? Did you really think the rules then are the same now? 

Oh my do you need to catch up.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>lawrencejnc,,</p>
<p>Barry Sanders? Did you really think the rules then are the same now? </p>
<p>Oh my do you need to catch up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: georgebrett</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/01/23/jim-harbaugh-compares-bradshaw-non-fumble-to-tuck-rule/#comment-1537915</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[georgebrett]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 19:28:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=181427#comment-1537915</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[yayarea3,

you are correct, when a runner is falling forward the play is not stopped. But when he is going backwards face up with his feet off the ground in a fetal position the play is stopped. 

Good call.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yayarea3,</p>
<p>you are correct, when a runner is falling forward the play is not stopped. But when he is going backwards face up with his feet off the ground in a fetal position the play is stopped. </p>
<p>Good call.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: georgebrett</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/01/23/jim-harbaugh-compares-bradshaw-non-fumble-to-tuck-rule/#comment-1537909</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[georgebrett]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 19:26:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=181427#comment-1537909</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[gcsuk,

in the NFL you cannot advance a muffed punt.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>gcsuk,</p>
<p>in the NFL you cannot advance a muffed punt.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: georgebrett</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/01/23/jim-harbaugh-compares-bradshaw-non-fumble-to-tuck-rule/#comment-1537899</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[georgebrett]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 19:23:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=181427#comment-1537899</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mr. Wright 212,

1:43 left on the clock. The Raiders fall on the ball and the game is over. 

PERIOD!!!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mr. Wright 212,</p>
<p>1:43 left on the clock. The Raiders fall on the ball and the game is over. </p>
<p>PERIOD!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: georgebrett</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/01/23/jim-harbaugh-compares-bradshaw-non-fumble-to-tuck-rule/#comment-1537881</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[georgebrett]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 19:15:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=181427#comment-1537881</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[omniscient48,

if the runner is in a vulnerable position as he was. Facing upwards with his feet off the ground and in a fetal position. The whistle is blown. Also, even if the whistle was blown a little late doesn&#039;t mean that it shouldn&#039;t have been blown a bit earlier. The ref made the call based on what he was looking at and that is all that matters. Had Bradshaw been on his feet with a chance of escaping and making a play the whistle would have come later. It&#039;s a pretty simple rule.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>omniscient48,</p>
<p>if the runner is in a vulnerable position as he was. Facing upwards with his feet off the ground and in a fetal position. The whistle is blown. Also, even if the whistle was blown a little late doesn&#8217;t mean that it shouldn&#8217;t have been blown a bit earlier. The ref made the call based on what he was looking at and that is all that matters. Had Bradshaw been on his feet with a chance of escaping and making a play the whistle would have come later. It&#8217;s a pretty simple rule.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bojack34</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/01/23/jim-harbaugh-compares-bradshaw-non-fumble-to-tuck-rule/#comment-1537874</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[bojack34]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 19:13:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=181427#comment-1537874</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[pftcensorssuck says:
Jan 24, 2012 9:54 AM
I constantly feel the need to remind you “tuck rule” morons that the Raiders had TWO opportunities to stop Patriot drives after that play, and FAILED to stop them BOTH times.

It wasn’t the “tuck rule” that cost the Raiders that game, it was the complete failure of the Raiders defense to stop New England’s offense.

TWICE.

Look it up, and shut up already.


___________________________________

If the call is made correctly, Raiders win, they just have to kneel it out.  Of course it cost them the game.  Yes, they also could have stopped NE after the BS Tuck Rule interpretation and won the game.  They didn&#039;t.  That doesn&#039;t change the fact that Oakland would have won the game, 100% chance, had the play been ruled correctly as a fumble.

Stop trying to defend the worst call ever.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>pftcensorssuck says:<br />
Jan 24, 2012 9:54 AM<br />
I constantly feel the need to remind you “tuck rule” morons that the Raiders had TWO opportunities to stop Patriot drives after that play, and FAILED to stop them BOTH times.</p>
<p>It wasn’t the “tuck rule” that cost the Raiders that game, it was the complete failure of the Raiders defense to stop New England’s offense.</p>
<p>TWICE.</p>
<p>Look it up, and shut up already.</p>
<p>___________________________________</p>
<p>If the call is made correctly, Raiders win, they just have to kneel it out.  Of course it cost them the game.  Yes, they also could have stopped NE after the BS Tuck Rule interpretation and won the game.  They didn&#8217;t.  That doesn&#8217;t change the fact that Oakland would have won the game, 100% chance, had the play been ruled correctly as a fumble.</p>
<p>Stop trying to defend the worst call ever.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: georgebrett</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/01/23/jim-harbaugh-compares-bradshaw-non-fumble-to-tuck-rule/#comment-1537872</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[georgebrett]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 19:11:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=181427#comment-1537872</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Skinzfan21,

you said....the refs blew this call! I replayed this play 5-10 times on DVR and the ball had been ripped out 1-2 seconds prior to the whistle being blown.

1-2 seconds. What is it? You have it recorded. 

One Thousand one

or

One thousand one one thousand two

I also have it recorded and mine shows it being whistled before the ball is stripped. Maybe the NFL sent out a DirectTV virus so there would be controversy.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Skinzfan21,</p>
<p>you said&#8230;.the refs blew this call! I replayed this play 5-10 times on DVR and the ball had been ripped out 1-2 seconds prior to the whistle being blown.</p>
<p>1-2 seconds. What is it? You have it recorded. </p>
<p>One Thousand one</p>
<p>or</p>
<p>One thousand one one thousand two</p>
<p>I also have it recorded and mine shows it being whistled before the ball is stripped. Maybe the NFL sent out a DirectTV virus so there would be controversy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: georgebrett</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/01/23/jim-harbaugh-compares-bradshaw-non-fumble-to-tuck-rule/#comment-1537840</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[georgebrett]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 19:04:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=181427#comment-1537840</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[patpatriotagain,

if someone would have speared Bradshaw it would indeed have been a penalty. Late hit and or unnecessary roughness. That&#039;s a no brainer.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>patpatriotagain,</p>
<p>if someone would have speared Bradshaw it would indeed have been a penalty. Late hit and or unnecessary roughness. That&#8217;s a no brainer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: georgebrett</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/01/23/jim-harbaugh-compares-bradshaw-non-fumble-to-tuck-rule/#comment-1537825</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[georgebrett]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 19:00:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=181427#comment-1537825</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[kilo0986,

I have it recorded and I just watched it 11 times and the whistle does sound before the ball comes out. 

Regardless, as soon as he was in a fetal position with his face up the progress is stopped.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>kilo0986,</p>
<p>I have it recorded and I just watched it 11 times and the whistle does sound before the ball comes out. </p>
<p>Regardless, as soon as he was in a fetal position with his face up the progress is stopped.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
