<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Giants defense has reason to think it matches up well</title>
	<atom:link href="http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/01/25/giants-defense-has-reason-to-think-it-matches-up-well/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/01/25/giants-defense-has-reason-to-think-it-matches-up-well/</link>
	<description>ProFootballTalk on NBCSports.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 13:43:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: brianmirabile</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/01/25/giants-defense-has-reason-to-think-it-matches-up-well/#comment-1544915</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[brianmirabile]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 17:35:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=181716#comment-1544915</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m pretty sure you all are forgetting that the GMEN did not have Bradshaw or Nicks during the first matchup....... just sayin]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m pretty sure you all are forgetting that the GMEN did not have Bradshaw or Nicks during the first matchup&#8230;&#8230;. just sayin</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bcgreg</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/01/25/giants-defense-has-reason-to-think-it-matches-up-well/#comment-1542659</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[bcgreg]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 18:29:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=181716#comment-1542659</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@ davebrownspiral

The Giants actually scored 24 points, not 28.  The Patriots also played without Brandon Spikes and Patrick Chung on defense as opposed to Gary Guyton and Sergio Brown.  Big difference there too.

And for all who have said Brady didn&#039;t do anything until the 4th quarter in the regular season match up?  The score was 0-0 at halftime.  Eli didn&#039;t do anything until the 2nd half either.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ davebrownspiral</p>
<p>The Giants actually scored 24 points, not 28.  The Patriots also played without Brandon Spikes and Patrick Chung on defense as opposed to Gary Guyton and Sergio Brown.  Big difference there too.</p>
<p>And for all who have said Brady didn&#8217;t do anything until the 4th quarter in the regular season match up?  The score was 0-0 at halftime.  Eli didn&#8217;t do anything until the 2nd half either.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pattyarbuccholz</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/01/25/giants-defense-has-reason-to-think-it-matches-up-well/#comment-1542110</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[pattyarbuccholz]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 15:05:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=181716#comment-1542110</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[skinsrock says: 
Jan 25, 2012 3:12 PM 
I already told ya… It’s gonna be a blowout &amp; there isn’t one person I can legitimately root for on either team… It’s MOVIE NIGHT!!!!

------------------------------------------------

You can&#039;t root for Marcus Cannon or Mark Herzlich, you heartless weasel?  Have fun watching a movie...alone.  Definitely alone.  By the way, your name doesn&#039;t make a whole lot of sense...The only thing the Skins &quot;rock&quot; is piss poor play for the last 20 or so years.  I think your name meant to be &quot;skinsembarrass&quot;.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>skinsrock says:<br />
Jan 25, 2012 3:12 PM<br />
I already told ya… It’s gonna be a blowout &amp; there isn’t one person I can legitimately root for on either team… It’s MOVIE NIGHT!!!!</p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;</p>
<p>You can&#8217;t root for Marcus Cannon or Mark Herzlich, you heartless weasel?  Have fun watching a movie&#8230;alone.  Definitely alone.  By the way, your name doesn&#8217;t make a whole lot of sense&#8230;The only thing the Skins &#8220;rock&#8221; is piss poor play for the last 20 or so years.  I think your name meant to be &#8220;skinsembarrass&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: homelanddefense</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/01/25/giants-defense-has-reason-to-think-it-matches-up-well/#comment-1542029</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[homelanddefense]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 14:25:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=181716#comment-1542029</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[pftcensorssuck says: Jan 25, 2012 3:34 PM

homelanddefense says:
I hate to say it, but this Pats fan is taking the Giants next week.
———————————————————
Then you aren’t much of a Pat’s fan. Have you even HEARD of this coach they’ve got; Bill Belichick?

I mean, it’s not like Belichick is going to look at the first game, and come up with an entirely different look to minimize the Giants strengths or capitalize on their weaknesses or anything, right?

Or does a 9-7 team have no weaknesses????

Freakin’ geniuses ……. I don’t even know why they bother to play the games if you Einsteins have it all figured out.

_______________________________

So because I dont think they are going to win a game that means Im not a Pat&#039;s fan?  Im sorry that you Patriots footy pajama wearing homers dont like to hear that your team can lose.  I lose the Pats and I HOPE I am wrong.  Its just my opinion on the game.

And yes I am well aware who the coach is, but that doesnt mean he can overcome having very little talent on D.  Just because you have the best coach or QB doesnt mean you win.  And dont make it sound like he wins every time he gets a second crack at a team.  He had two matchups with the Jets last year before losing in the playoffs.  Lost the second game to the Giants in 2007.  And its not like Coughlin is a high school coach.

Of course the Giants have weaknesses, and so do the Pats.  You think the Giants wont go after our weaknesses?  I am looking at the game from an objective point of view.  My OPINION is the Giants win.  Its not what I want just how I feel.

Quit being a jackass.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>pftcensorssuck says: Jan 25, 2012 3:34 PM</p>
<p>homelanddefense says:<br />
I hate to say it, but this Pats fan is taking the Giants next week.<br />
———————————————————<br />
Then you aren’t much of a Pat’s fan. Have you even HEARD of this coach they’ve got; Bill Belichick?</p>
<p>I mean, it’s not like Belichick is going to look at the first game, and come up with an entirely different look to minimize the Giants strengths or capitalize on their weaknesses or anything, right?</p>
<p>Or does a 9-7 team have no weaknesses????</p>
<p>Freakin’ geniuses ……. I don’t even know why they bother to play the games if you Einsteins have it all figured out.</p>
<p>_______________________________</p>
<p>So because I dont think they are going to win a game that means Im not a Pat&#8217;s fan?  Im sorry that you Patriots footy pajama wearing homers dont like to hear that your team can lose.  I lose the Pats and I HOPE I am wrong.  Its just my opinion on the game.</p>
<p>And yes I am well aware who the coach is, but that doesnt mean he can overcome having very little talent on D.  Just because you have the best coach or QB doesnt mean you win.  And dont make it sound like he wins every time he gets a second crack at a team.  He had two matchups with the Jets last year before losing in the playoffs.  Lost the second game to the Giants in 2007.  And its not like Coughlin is a high school coach.</p>
<p>Of course the Giants have weaknesses, and so do the Pats.  You think the Giants wont go after our weaknesses?  I am looking at the game from an objective point of view.  My OPINION is the Giants win.  Its not what I want just how I feel.</p>
<p>Quit being a jackass.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: homelanddefense</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/01/25/giants-defense-has-reason-to-think-it-matches-up-well/#comment-1542019</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[homelanddefense]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 14:21:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=181716#comment-1542019</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[basshawg says: Jan 25, 2012 7:57 PM

Really? They’re only gonna drop 5 into coverage and rush 4? I know we’re all feeling good about the “matchup” but let’s be real … Brady is sick hella good and they’re gonna want all 11 defenders (12 if they can get away with it) on the field at all times.

__________________________________

I posted right after that and corrected it to rush 4 and drop 7, but they deleted the comment.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>basshawg says: Jan 25, 2012 7:57 PM</p>
<p>Really? They’re only gonna drop 5 into coverage and rush 4? I know we’re all feeling good about the “matchup” but let’s be real … Brady is sick hella good and they’re gonna want all 11 defenders (12 if they can get away with it) on the field at all times.</p>
<p>__________________________________</p>
<p>I posted right after that and corrected it to rush 4 and drop 7, but they deleted the comment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mr. Wright 212</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/01/25/giants-defense-has-reason-to-think-it-matches-up-well/#comment-1541966</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mr. Wright 212]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 13:58:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=181716#comment-1541966</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[kisstherings says: 
Jan 25, 2012 4:44 PM 
This is playing right into the Pats hands

Keep talking Giants


------------

Where is anyone &quot;talking&quot; (trash, presumably -- because otherwise, you have to &quot;talk&quot; in order to ANSWER QUESTIONS that are asked of you)? Please point it out to us.

As I&#039;ve said numerous times on this site, Patriots fans are miserable and pathetic excuses for human beings. They live vicariously through that team, a team that they know got its reputation built upon cheating to win Super Bowls. A team that gives them the only purpose for living, as they are erstwhile useless, miserable, inferiority complex-ridden, insecure eunuchs who especially have the aforementioned complex with respect to New York in general.

THIS FURTHER PROVES IT. Just making up this esoteric &quot;talking&quot; out of thin air in order to make people appear to be bragging and villainous. It&#039;s a tired act.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>kisstherings says:<br />
Jan 25, 2012 4:44 PM<br />
This is playing right into the Pats hands</p>
<p>Keep talking Giants</p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;</p>
<p>Where is anyone &#8220;talking&#8221; (trash, presumably &#8212; because otherwise, you have to &#8220;talk&#8221; in order to ANSWER QUESTIONS that are asked of you)? Please point it out to us.</p>
<p>As I&#8217;ve said numerous times on this site, Patriots fans are miserable and pathetic excuses for human beings. They live vicariously through that team, a team that they know got its reputation built upon cheating to win Super Bowls. A team that gives them the only purpose for living, as they are erstwhile useless, miserable, inferiority complex-ridden, insecure eunuchs who especially have the aforementioned complex with respect to New York in general.</p>
<p>THIS FURTHER PROVES IT. Just making up this esoteric &#8220;talking&#8221; out of thin air in order to make people appear to be bragging and villainous. It&#8217;s a tired act.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mr. Wright 212</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/01/25/giants-defense-has-reason-to-think-it-matches-up-well/#comment-1541958</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mr. Wright 212]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 13:53:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=181716#comment-1541958</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[2sausage11 says: 
Jan 25, 2012 3:52 PM 
Pats 30

Giants 24


----------

Please break it down to me... objectively (if it is possible of a Patriots fan), how you figure they will score 30 points?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>2sausage11 says:<br />
Jan 25, 2012 3:52 PM<br />
Pats 30</p>
<p>Giants 24</p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-</p>
<p>Please break it down to me&#8230; objectively (if it is possible of a Patriots fan), how you figure they will score 30 points?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mr. Wright 212</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/01/25/giants-defense-has-reason-to-think-it-matches-up-well/#comment-1541956</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mr. Wright 212]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 13:53:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=181716#comment-1541956</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[1historian says: 
Jan 25, 2012 8:43 PM 
Giants beat the Pats 3 straight times?

Ain’t happenin’!

-------------
You also said the Giants couldn&#039;t beat them at home earlier this year.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1historian says:<br />
Jan 25, 2012 8:43 PM<br />
Giants beat the Pats 3 straight times?</p>
<p>Ain’t happenin’!</p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-<br />
You also said the Giants couldn&#8217;t beat them at home earlier this year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mr. Wright 212</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/01/25/giants-defense-has-reason-to-think-it-matches-up-well/#comment-1541954</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mr. Wright 212]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 13:52:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=181716#comment-1541954</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011. This is the Giants 2nd Super Bowl in FIVE seasons. Just like the Patriots won 3 in FOUR seasons even though the games were spaced over just 3 calendar years (first win in Feb 2002, 3rd win in Feb 2005). Anyway, 7 teams (including TWICE to the Redskins) didn’t have a huge problem with JPP and that d-line. It’ll be a battle though for sure. And yes, Brady did eat those words. Can’t argue that.

-----------

Giants didn&#039;t cheat to get there nor win, though.

*2001.
*2003.
*2004.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011. This is the Giants 2nd Super Bowl in FIVE seasons. Just like the Patriots won 3 in FOUR seasons even though the games were spaced over just 3 calendar years (first win in Feb 2002, 3rd win in Feb 2005). Anyway, 7 teams (including TWICE to the Redskins) didn’t have a huge problem with JPP and that d-line. It’ll be a battle though for sure. And yes, Brady did eat those words. Can’t argue that.</p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;</p>
<p>Giants didn&#8217;t cheat to get there nor win, though.</p>
<p>*2001.<br />
*2003.<br />
*2004.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mr. Wright 212</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/01/25/giants-defense-has-reason-to-think-it-matches-up-well/#comment-1541950</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mr. Wright 212]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 13:44:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=181716#comment-1541950</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[nesuperfan says: 
Jan 25, 2012 9:45 PM 
MossMoon2Packers says:Jan 25, 2012 3:46 PM 

I don’t have a horse in this race, but you gotta like the Giants in the SB. The Patriots remind me of the Packers and Saints — lots of offensive fire-power, but with a crappy defense that is their Achilles heel and will be their downfall. The Giants are healthy and playing well on both sides of the ball, with a tenacious pass-rush, as we saw in all 3 of their playoff wins, including the sh!t-kicking of the Packers. And Eli and his WRs will make it a long day for the Patriots’ pass defense. Honestly, I don’t think it’ll be close.
__________________________________

You talk about the Pats’ defense like the Giants’ defense was superb. The Pats were 31st, but the Giants were only 27th. But the more important stat is the Pats were 15th in points allowed, but the Giants were a miserable 25th, giving up 58 more points this year than the Pats did.

That said, throw all that BS out. So far, both teams have been playing defense like they are on a mission, so anyone, who points to the regular season right now is bound to have information as bad as your original hypothesis. In the post season, the Pats have given up only 15 points per game, and the Giants 13…stellar.

Both are playing great at the right time, and it is going to simply come down to playing the game, but you go ahead and think that it will be a blowout. Bet big.

----------------

Packer fans cited those same stats out of context. So did Niner fans. Are you going to get with reality (Osi is back, Tuck is healthy/(ier), Herzlich will play, and the fact that Fewell has condensed the scheme and allowed the younger guys to fly around and make plays instead of thinking more than reacting) and stop referring to stats that were mostly comprised when several key players on that defense were out for significant stretches of the season. Those defensive statistics have had ZERO bearing on games in almost two months now.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>nesuperfan says:<br />
Jan 25, 2012 9:45 PM<br />
MossMoon2Packers says:Jan 25, 2012 3:46 PM </p>
<p>I don’t have a horse in this race, but you gotta like the Giants in the SB. The Patriots remind me of the Packers and Saints — lots of offensive fire-power, but with a crappy defense that is their Achilles heel and will be their downfall. The Giants are healthy and playing well on both sides of the ball, with a tenacious pass-rush, as we saw in all 3 of their playoff wins, including the sh!t-kicking of the Packers. And Eli and his WRs will make it a long day for the Patriots’ pass defense. Honestly, I don’t think it’ll be close.<br />
__________________________________</p>
<p>You talk about the Pats’ defense like the Giants’ defense was superb. The Pats were 31st, but the Giants were only 27th. But the more important stat is the Pats were 15th in points allowed, but the Giants were a miserable 25th, giving up 58 more points this year than the Pats did.</p>
<p>That said, throw all that BS out. So far, both teams have been playing defense like they are on a mission, so anyone, who points to the regular season right now is bound to have information as bad as your original hypothesis. In the post season, the Pats have given up only 15 points per game, and the Giants 13…stellar.</p>
<p>Both are playing great at the right time, and it is going to simply come down to playing the game, but you go ahead and think that it will be a blowout. Bet big.</p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-</p>
<p>Packer fans cited those same stats out of context. So did Niner fans. Are you going to get with reality (Osi is back, Tuck is healthy/(ier), Herzlich will play, and the fact that Fewell has condensed the scheme and allowed the younger guys to fly around and make plays instead of thinking more than reacting) and stop referring to stats that were mostly comprised when several key players on that defense were out for significant stretches of the season. Those defensive statistics have had ZERO bearing on games in almost two months now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mr. Wright 212</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/01/25/giants-defense-has-reason-to-think-it-matches-up-well/#comment-1541944</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mr. Wright 212]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 13:41:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=181716#comment-1541944</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[pftcensorssuck says: 
Jan 25, 2012 3:34 PM 
homelanddefense says:
I hate to say it, but this Pats fan is taking the Giants next week.
———————————————————
Then you aren’t much of a Pat’s fan. Have you even HEARD of this coach they’ve got; Bill Belichick?

I mean, it’s not like Belichick is going to look at the first game, and come up with an entirely different look to minimize the Giants strengths or capitalize on their weaknesses or anything, right?

Or does a 9-7 team have no weaknesses????

Freakin’ geniuses ……. I don’t even know why they bother to play the games if you Einsteins have it all figured out.

-------------

Actually no, it would make him one of the very few reasonable Patriots fans who exist. He&#039;s not a blind homer who thinks they will always win and gloats to everyone within earshot, even when reality and results belie their foolish bragging.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>pftcensorssuck says:<br />
Jan 25, 2012 3:34 PM<br />
homelanddefense says:<br />
I hate to say it, but this Pats fan is taking the Giants next week.<br />
———————————————————<br />
Then you aren’t much of a Pat’s fan. Have you even HEARD of this coach they’ve got; Bill Belichick?</p>
<p>I mean, it’s not like Belichick is going to look at the first game, and come up with an entirely different look to minimize the Giants strengths or capitalize on their weaknesses or anything, right?</p>
<p>Or does a 9-7 team have no weaknesses????</p>
<p>Freakin’ geniuses ……. I don’t even know why they bother to play the games if you Einsteins have it all figured out.</p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-</p>
<p>Actually no, it would make him one of the very few reasonable Patriots fans who exist. He&#8217;s not a blind homer who thinks they will always win and gloats to everyone within earshot, even when reality and results belie their foolish bragging.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mr. Wright 212</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/01/25/giants-defense-has-reason-to-think-it-matches-up-well/#comment-1541941</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mr. Wright 212]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 13:40:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=181716#comment-1541941</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[rexryansdirtysock says: 
Jan 25, 2012 3:23 PM 
You do realize that the Patriots’ defense also shut out the Giants offense in the first half of that game also?

----------

You do realize that Bradshaw and Nicks didn&#039;t play in the first OR second half of that game also, right?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>rexryansdirtysock says:<br />
Jan 25, 2012 3:23 PM<br />
You do realize that the Patriots’ defense also shut out the Giants offense in the first half of that game also?</p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-</p>
<p>You do realize that Bradshaw and Nicks didn&#8217;t play in the first OR second half of that game also, right?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mr. Wright 212</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/01/25/giants-defense-has-reason-to-think-it-matches-up-well/#comment-1541940</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mr. Wright 212]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 13:39:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=181716#comment-1541940</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[giselleisasucubus says: 
Jan 25, 2012 3:16 PM 
People also seem to forget that when great teams face each other twice in a season, it is typically a split. Look it up.

-----------

Has nothing to do with this game.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>giselleisasucubus says:<br />
Jan 25, 2012 3:16 PM<br />
People also seem to forget that when great teams face each other twice in a season, it is typically a split. Look it up.</p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;</p>
<p>Has nothing to do with this game.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mr. Wright 212</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/01/25/giants-defense-has-reason-to-think-it-matches-up-well/#comment-1541938</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mr. Wright 212]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 13:38:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=181716#comment-1541938</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Stat geeks like to point out what numbers Gronkowski had, and how Hernandez didn&#039;t play (??? -- what game were YOU watching?) in November, but Brady dinked and dunked for 2/3 of those yards. They weren&#039;t dominant just because he had 300+ yards passing. And the pass rush is better now than it was then. Tuck was hobbled, Osi was not 100%, and JPP was lined up at LE a bit more than at any other time. 

Just stop with the prognostications. The Giants have the advantages at every area, but the game has to be played. PERIOD. You cannot account for fumbles, bad calls and potential for injury to key guys. On PAPER, the Giants indeed do match up favorably against New England whether the Giants are on offense OR defense. But games aren&#039;t played on paper.

Ask the Philadelphia Eagles, who I&#039;m sure all of us here commeting share the common bond of flat out HATE towards them.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stat geeks like to point out what numbers Gronkowski had, and how Hernandez didn&#8217;t play (??? &#8212; what game were YOU watching?) in November, but Brady dinked and dunked for 2/3 of those yards. They weren&#8217;t dominant just because he had 300+ yards passing. And the pass rush is better now than it was then. Tuck was hobbled, Osi was not 100%, and JPP was lined up at LE a bit more than at any other time. </p>
<p>Just stop with the prognostications. The Giants have the advantages at every area, but the game has to be played. PERIOD. You cannot account for fumbles, bad calls and potential for injury to key guys. On PAPER, the Giants indeed do match up favorably against New England whether the Giants are on offense OR defense. But games aren&#8217;t played on paper.</p>
<p>Ask the Philadelphia Eagles, who I&#8217;m sure all of us here commeting share the common bond of flat out HATE towards them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mr. Wright 212</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/01/25/giants-defense-has-reason-to-think-it-matches-up-well/#comment-1541934</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mr. Wright 212]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 13:35:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=181716#comment-1541934</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[davebrownspiral says: 
Jan 25, 2012 3:20 PM 
Anybody who watched Deon Grant, Phillips and Rolle “covering” (I use that term loosely) Vernon Davis last week would disagree somewhat. I’m a huge Giants fan, and I beleive the Giants pass rush will give Brady problems, but the Pats will put up some decent yards that will result in points. However, I think the Giants offense will have a much easier time with the Pats D, which I think will ultimately be the difference. Remember, when the two teams met earlier in the year, Giants were without Nicks and Bradshaw, and still put 28 up on the board.

----------

You cannot transpose the results from one matchup to another. Football is all about individual matchups, then unit matchups as a whole.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>davebrownspiral says:<br />
Jan 25, 2012 3:20 PM<br />
Anybody who watched Deon Grant, Phillips and Rolle “covering” (I use that term loosely) Vernon Davis last week would disagree somewhat. I’m a huge Giants fan, and I beleive the Giants pass rush will give Brady problems, but the Pats will put up some decent yards that will result in points. However, I think the Giants offense will have a much easier time with the Pats D, which I think will ultimately be the difference. Remember, when the two teams met earlier in the year, Giants were without Nicks and Bradshaw, and still put 28 up on the board.</p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-</p>
<p>You cannot transpose the results from one matchup to another. Football is all about individual matchups, then unit matchups as a whole.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gimmeabruschi</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/01/25/giants-defense-has-reason-to-think-it-matches-up-well/#comment-1541845</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[gimmeabruschi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 12:23:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=181716#comment-1541845</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If the Giants should win the Redskins will be proud to brag they swept the SB champs.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If the Giants should win the Redskins will be proud to brag they swept the SB champs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nesuperfan</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/01/25/giants-defense-has-reason-to-think-it-matches-up-well/#comment-1541634</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[nesuperfan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 02:45:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=181716#comment-1541634</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[MossMoon2Packers says:Jan 25, 2012 3:46 PM 

I don’t have a horse in this race, but you gotta like the Giants in the SB. The Patriots remind me of the Packers and Saints — lots of offensive fire-power, but with a crappy defense that is their Achilles heel and will be their downfall. The Giants are healthy and playing well on both sides of the ball, with a tenacious pass-rush, as we saw in all 3 of their playoff wins, including the sh!t-kicking of the Packers. And Eli and his WRs will make it a long day for the Patriots’ pass defense. Honestly, I don’t think it’ll be close.
__________________________________

You talk about the Pats&#039; defense like the Giants&#039; defense was superb. The Pats were 31st, but the Giants were only 27th. But the more important stat is the Pats were 15th in points allowed, but the Giants were a miserable 25th, giving up 58 more points this year than the Pats did.

That said, throw all that BS out. So far, both teams have been playing defense like they are on a mission, so anyone, who points to the regular season right now is bound to have information as bad as your original hypothesis. In the post season, the Pats have given up only 15 points per game, and the Giants 13...stellar.

Both are playing great at the right time, and it is going to simply come down to playing the game, but you go ahead and think that it will be a blowout. Bet big.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MossMoon2Packers says:Jan 25, 2012 3:46 PM </p>
<p>I don’t have a horse in this race, but you gotta like the Giants in the SB. The Patriots remind me of the Packers and Saints — lots of offensive fire-power, but with a crappy defense that is their Achilles heel and will be their downfall. The Giants are healthy and playing well on both sides of the ball, with a tenacious pass-rush, as we saw in all 3 of their playoff wins, including the sh!t-kicking of the Packers. And Eli and his WRs will make it a long day for the Patriots’ pass defense. Honestly, I don’t think it’ll be close.<br />
__________________________________</p>
<p>You talk about the Pats&#8217; defense like the Giants&#8217; defense was superb. The Pats were 31st, but the Giants were only 27th. But the more important stat is the Pats were 15th in points allowed, but the Giants were a miserable 25th, giving up 58 more points this year than the Pats did.</p>
<p>That said, throw all that BS out. So far, both teams have been playing defense like they are on a mission, so anyone, who points to the regular season right now is bound to have information as bad as your original hypothesis. In the post season, the Pats have given up only 15 points per game, and the Giants 13&#8230;stellar.</p>
<p>Both are playing great at the right time, and it is going to simply come down to playing the game, but you go ahead and think that it will be a blowout. Bet big.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bigbluenationdb</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/01/25/giants-defense-has-reason-to-think-it-matches-up-well/#comment-1541609</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[bigbluenationdb]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 02:25:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=181716#comment-1541609</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Both these teams are playing totally different sine week 9.  New England has won 10 straight but in that stretch didnt beat only one team with a winning record.  Baltimore last week.  This is a defense that gave up 21 first quarter points to Buffalo only a few weeks ago.

New Englands offense is played in a box of about 15 yards.  They have no one that can stretch the field.  If the Giants don&#039;t miss tackles it will be difficult for New England to score.  

Giants offense is playing at a high level right now and much improved since week 9.  If Flacco can throw for 300+ with no wrs I like Elis chances.   Is Edelman going to cover Cruz in the slot?  Love that match up.

It will come down to which defense can get the most pressure on the QB and can force a turnover.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Both these teams are playing totally different sine week 9.  New England has won 10 straight but in that stretch didnt beat only one team with a winning record.  Baltimore last week.  This is a defense that gave up 21 first quarter points to Buffalo only a few weeks ago.</p>
<p>New Englands offense is played in a box of about 15 yards.  They have no one that can stretch the field.  If the Giants don&#8217;t miss tackles it will be difficult for New England to score.  </p>
<p>Giants offense is playing at a high level right now and much improved since week 9.  If Flacco can throw for 300+ with no wrs I like Elis chances.   Is Edelman going to cover Cruz in the slot?  Love that match up.</p>
<p>It will come down to which defense can get the most pressure on the QB and can force a turnover.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: imbetterthanyou</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/01/25/giants-defense-has-reason-to-think-it-matches-up-well/#comment-1541580</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[imbetterthanyou]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 02:02:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=181716#comment-1541580</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Oh look, another week and another group of fans with reading comprehensions of 1st graders. Please, I absolutely beg someone to point out the giants running their mouths here. &quot;we think think we match up well&quot;- tuck
&quot;they have a great group of players over there&quot;-antrel

That is not running of the mouth, that is answering a question and complimenting the opposing team.

The biggest question of these playoffs is to figure out whether fans in green bay, San Fran or new England have the worst reading skills.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh look, another week and another group of fans with reading comprehensions of 1st graders. Please, I absolutely beg someone to point out the giants running their mouths here. &#8220;we think think we match up well&#8221;- tuck<br />
&#8220;they have a great group of players over there&#8221;-antrel</p>
<p>That is not running of the mouth, that is answering a question and complimenting the opposing team.</p>
<p>The biggest question of these playoffs is to figure out whether fans in green bay, San Fran or new England have the worst reading skills.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: patriotinvasion</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/01/25/giants-defense-has-reason-to-think-it-matches-up-well/#comment-1541560</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[patriotinvasion]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 01:47:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=181716#comment-1541560</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[PS - As others have said, Brady won&#039;t be sitting back there for 4+ seconds waiting for Randy Moss to get open 40 yards downfield this time.  Completely different offense.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PS &#8211; As others have said, Brady won&#8217;t be sitting back there for 4+ seconds waiting for Randy Moss to get open 40 yards downfield this time.  Completely different offense.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: patriotinvasion</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/01/25/giants-defense-has-reason-to-think-it-matches-up-well/#comment-1541556</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[patriotinvasion]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 01:43:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=181716#comment-1541556</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[trephi says:
Jan 25, 2012 7:57 PM
patriotinvasion says:
Jan 25, 2012 7:29 PM

They have a slightly more impressive resume than a team that won a Super Bowl 5 seasons ago on the back of a miraculous helmet catch in the final minutes.

A)..it was 4 seasons ago and B) they ALSO won it cause they put Brady on his a** more then he ever was with a similar cast of characters which NOW also includes JPP.

(Bonus note: “We’re only going to score 17 pts? OK! (sarcastic laugh) – Tom Brady, 2008) Oops.
___________________

2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011.  This is the Giants 2nd Super Bowl in FIVE seasons.  Just like the Patriots won 3 in FOUR seasons even though the games were spaced over just 3 calendar years (first win in Feb 2002, 3rd win in Feb 2005).  Anyway, 7 teams (including TWICE to the Redskins) didn&#039;t have a huge problem with JPP and that d-line.  It&#039;ll be a battle though for sure.  And yes, Brady did eat those words.  Can&#039;t argue that.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>trephi says:<br />
Jan 25, 2012 7:57 PM<br />
patriotinvasion says:<br />
Jan 25, 2012 7:29 PM</p>
<p>They have a slightly more impressive resume than a team that won a Super Bowl 5 seasons ago on the back of a miraculous helmet catch in the final minutes.</p>
<p>A)..it was 4 seasons ago and B) they ALSO won it cause they put Brady on his a** more then he ever was with a similar cast of characters which NOW also includes JPP.</p>
<p>(Bonus note: “We’re only going to score 17 pts? OK! (sarcastic laugh) – Tom Brady, 2008) Oops.<br />
___________________</p>
<p>2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011.  This is the Giants 2nd Super Bowl in FIVE seasons.  Just like the Patriots won 3 in FOUR seasons even though the games were spaced over just 3 calendar years (first win in Feb 2002, 3rd win in Feb 2005).  Anyway, 7 teams (including TWICE to the Redskins) didn&#8217;t have a huge problem with JPP and that d-line.  It&#8217;ll be a battle though for sure.  And yes, Brady did eat those words.  Can&#8217;t argue that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 1historian</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/01/25/giants-defense-has-reason-to-think-it-matches-up-well/#comment-1541553</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[1historian]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 01:43:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=181716#comment-1541553</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Giants beat the Pats 3 straight times?

Ain&#039;t happenin&#039;!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Giants beat the Pats 3 straight times?</p>
<p>Ain&#8217;t happenin&#8217;!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mhohmann</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/01/25/giants-defense-has-reason-to-think-it-matches-up-well/#comment-1541511</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[mhohmann]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 01:00:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=181716#comment-1541511</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Giants organization is pure class.   Jets organization is trash.   Giants do match up well with NE but NE also matches up pretty well with the GMEN.   Giants were without many people in that game and some were playing hurt like Tuck.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Giants organization is pure class.   Jets organization is trash.   Giants do match up well with NE but NE also matches up pretty well with the GMEN.   Giants were without many people in that game and some were playing hurt like Tuck.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: trephi</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/01/25/giants-defense-has-reason-to-think-it-matches-up-well/#comment-1541508</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[trephi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 00:57:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=181716#comment-1541508</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[patriotinvasion says: 
Jan 25, 2012 7:29 PM 

They have a slightly more impressive resume than a team that won a Super Bowl 5 seasons ago on the back of a miraculous helmet catch in the final minutes.

A)..it was 4 seasons ago and B) they ALSO won it cause they put Brady on his a** more then he ever was with a similar cast of characters which NOW also includes JPP.  

(Bonus note:  &quot;We&#039;re only going to score 17 pts?  OK!  (sarcastic laugh) - Tom Brady, 2008)  Oops.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>patriotinvasion says:<br />
Jan 25, 2012 7:29 PM </p>
<p>They have a slightly more impressive resume than a team that won a Super Bowl 5 seasons ago on the back of a miraculous helmet catch in the final minutes.</p>
<p>A)..it was 4 seasons ago and B) they ALSO won it cause they put Brady on his a** more then he ever was with a similar cast of characters which NOW also includes JPP.  </p>
<p>(Bonus note:  &#8220;We&#8217;re only going to score 17 pts?  OK!  (sarcastic laugh) &#8211; Tom Brady, 2008)  Oops.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: basshawg</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/01/25/giants-defense-has-reason-to-think-it-matches-up-well/#comment-1541507</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[basshawg]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 00:57:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=181716#comment-1541507</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Really? They&#039;re only gonna drop 5 into coverage and rush 4? I know we&#039;re all feeling good about the &quot;matchup&quot; but let&#039;s be real ... Brady is sick hella good and they&#039;re gonna want all 11 defenders (12 if they can get away with it) on the field at all times.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Really? They&#8217;re only gonna drop 5 into coverage and rush 4? I know we&#8217;re all feeling good about the &#8220;matchup&#8221; but let&#8217;s be real &#8230; Brady is sick hella good and they&#8217;re gonna want all 11 defenders (12 if they can get away with it) on the field at all times.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: db105</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/01/25/giants-defense-has-reason-to-think-it-matches-up-well/#comment-1541488</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[db105]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 00:45:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=181716#comment-1541488</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m a fan of neither team. Just wondering... Didn&#039;t the Giants go 9-7 and give up 400 points this season? If you think that&#039;s elite then I have some beach front property in Nebraska to sell you.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m a fan of neither team. Just wondering&#8230; Didn&#8217;t the Giants go 9-7 and give up 400 points this season? If you think that&#8217;s elite then I have some beach front property in Nebraska to sell you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TheWizard</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/01/25/giants-defense-has-reason-to-think-it-matches-up-well/#comment-1541469</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[TheWizard]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 00:33:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=181716#comment-1541469</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Enough about the big, bad, Giants.

Pats shouldn&#039;t have any trouble building the hatred.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Enough about the big, bad, Giants.</p>
<p>Pats shouldn&#8217;t have any trouble building the hatred.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hebertespinosa</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/01/25/giants-defense-has-reason-to-think-it-matches-up-well/#comment-1541465</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[hebertespinosa]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 00:32:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=181716#comment-1541465</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[No wonder...one more game to be decided by a Field Goal! Go Giants!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No wonder&#8230;one more game to be decided by a Field Goal! Go Giants!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: patriotinvasion</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/01/25/giants-defense-has-reason-to-think-it-matches-up-well/#comment-1541460</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[patriotinvasion]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 00:29:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=181716#comment-1541460</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Huge Pats fan with respect for the Giants and a lot of their players.  That said, is there anything more collegey/corny than &quot;big blue&quot; and &quot;let&#039;s go big blue&quot;? Yikes.  

That said, all of the big blue bandwagon should be careful underestimating a motivated Tom Brady and William Belichick.  They have a slightly more impressive resume than a team that won a Super Bowl 5 seasons ago on the back of a miraculous helmet catch in the final minutes.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Huge Pats fan with respect for the Giants and a lot of their players.  That said, is there anything more collegey/corny than &#8220;big blue&#8221; and &#8220;let&#8217;s go big blue&#8221;? Yikes.  </p>
<p>That said, all of the big blue bandwagon should be careful underestimating a motivated Tom Brady and William Belichick.  They have a slightly more impressive resume than a team that won a Super Bowl 5 seasons ago on the back of a miraculous helmet catch in the final minutes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: drednot</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/01/25/giants-defense-has-reason-to-think-it-matches-up-well/#comment-1541380</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[drednot]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 23:50:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=181716#comment-1541380</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What is it with the media? Why is it all about how the Giants match up against the Pats? Shouldn&#039;t be the other way around? And espn makes me sick. Every highlight they show, no matter what team they&#039;re talking about, they show a highlight against the Pats!! Did the Patriots play all 31 teams last year??? WTF]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What is it with the media? Why is it all about how the Giants match up against the Pats? Shouldn&#8217;t be the other way around? And espn makes me sick. Every highlight they show, no matter what team they&#8217;re talking about, they show a highlight against the Pats!! Did the Patriots play all 31 teams last year??? WTF</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
