<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Hall of Fame process still needs to be changed</title>
	<atom:link href="http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/02/07/hall-of-fame-process-still-needs-to-be-changed/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/02/07/hall-of-fame-process-still-needs-to-be-changed/</link>
	<description>ProFootballTalk on NBCSports.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 01:00:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Deb</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/02/07/hall-of-fame-process-still-needs-to-be-changed/#comment-1568610</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Deb]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 21:59:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=230045#comment-1568610</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@dailynorseman ...

Actually, the difference is a little broader than that. Yes, it certainly helped to have Lombardi lobbying for Hornung for years. But Hornung was also a much more significant figure in the history of the game than Karras. And Karras was belligerent when they were caught. That certainly didn&#039;t help his case.

I&#039;m not sure how I feel about them getting into the hall because they didn&#039;t bet on their own games. But I&#039;m very sure no one has the right to remove deserving players like Simpson from the hall for things they did long after they retired. What players do after they stop playing has nothing to do with their football achievements.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@dailynorseman &#8230;</p>
<p>Actually, the difference is a little broader than that. Yes, it certainly helped to have Lombardi lobbying for Hornung for years. But Hornung was also a much more significant figure in the history of the game than Karras. And Karras was belligerent when they were caught. That certainly didn&#8217;t help his case.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not sure how I feel about them getting into the hall because they didn&#8217;t bet on their own games. But I&#8217;m very sure no one has the right to remove deserving players like Simpson from the hall for things they did long after they retired. What players do after they stop playing has nothing to do with their football achievements.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dailynorseman</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/02/07/hall-of-fame-process-still-needs-to-be-changed/#comment-1567163</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[dailynorseman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 04:29:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=230045#comment-1567163</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@Deb

&quot;Alex Karras &lt;i&gt;admitted&lt;/i&gt; placing bets on NFL games &lt;i&gt;while playing in the league&lt;/i&gt;. That’s why he’s not in the Hall of Fame.&quot;

With all due respect, so did Paul Hornung. And he &lt;i&gt;IS&lt;/i&gt; in the Pro Football Hall of Fame.

Want to know the difference? Look at what teams Karras and Hornung played for. There&#039;s your difference.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Deb</p>
<p>&#8220;Alex Karras <i>admitted</i> placing bets on NFL games <i>while playing in the league</i>. That’s why he’s not in the Hall of Fame.&#8221;</p>
<p>With all due respect, so did Paul Hornung. And he <i>IS</i> in the Pro Football Hall of Fame.</p>
<p>Want to know the difference? Look at what teams Karras and Hornung played for. There&#8217;s your difference.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jwag777</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/02/07/hall-of-fame-process-still-needs-to-be-changed/#comment-1566410</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jwag777]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 22:16:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=230045#comment-1566410</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Requiring a MINIMUM number of entrants each year is a joke. Guaranteed to water down the quality of the membership. And let&#039;s get Ray Guy in there for Pete&#039;s same! Definitely needs revamping....]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Requiring a MINIMUM number of entrants each year is a joke. Guaranteed to water down the quality of the membership. And let&#8217;s get Ray Guy in there for Pete&#8217;s same! Definitely needs revamping&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: therealsmiley</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/02/07/hall-of-fame-process-still-needs-to-be-changed/#comment-1566161</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[therealsmiley]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 19:59:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=230045#comment-1566161</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Bill Parcells great?  Ehhhh...he was a good coach.  Great?  Naaaaaa.  Hail!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bill Parcells great?  Ehhhh&#8230;he was a good coach.  Great?  Naaaaaa.  Hail!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LoCoSu@%s</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/02/07/hall-of-fame-process-still-needs-to-be-changed/#comment-1566144</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[LoCoSu@%s]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 19:51:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=230045#comment-1566144</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[uptowndan says:
Feb 7, 2012 11:49 AM
LoCoSu@%s says: who is Ira Miller and Nancy Gay? Ira Miller is a long time sportswriter from the Bay Area and was president of the football writers of America. Nancy Gay is from the Bay Area. I beleive that the writers from each area elect someone to be on the committee.

-----------------------

I am very much aware who Ira Miller (the curmudgeon) and Nancy Gay are.
There are far better candidates in the Bay Area to represent HOF voters than those two.

On the positive side - at least Lowell Cohn is not a voter.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>uptowndan says:<br />
Feb 7, 2012 11:49 AM<br />
LoCoSu@%s says: who is Ira Miller and Nancy Gay? Ira Miller is a long time sportswriter from the Bay Area and was president of the football writers of America. Nancy Gay is from the Bay Area. I beleive that the writers from each area elect someone to be on the committee.</p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;</p>
<p>I am very much aware who Ira Miller (the curmudgeon) and Nancy Gay are.<br />
There are far better candidates in the Bay Area to represent HOF voters than those two.</p>
<p>On the positive side &#8211; at least Lowell Cohn is not a voter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Deb</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/02/07/hall-of-fame-process-still-needs-to-be-changed/#comment-1566143</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Deb]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 19:51:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=230045#comment-1566143</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@bluepike ...

O.J. Simpson was one of the greatest and most influential running backs ever to play the game. Even if he&#039;d been convicted of those murders, there&#039;s no reason for him to be removed from the Hall of Fame. His performance on the football field wasn&#039;t altered by crimes he committed 15 years after he retired from the sport. Do you intend to remove Lawrence Taylor as well following his recent conviction, which also occurred long after his retirement? They earned their achievements on the field. That has nothing to do with what happened years later.

Alex Karras &lt;em&gt;admitted&lt;/em&gt; placing bets on NFL games &lt;em&gt;while playing in the league&lt;/em&gt;. That&#039;s why he&#039;s not in the Hall of Fame.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@bluepike &#8230;</p>
<p>O.J. Simpson was one of the greatest and most influential running backs ever to play the game. Even if he&#8217;d been convicted of those murders, there&#8217;s no reason for him to be removed from the Hall of Fame. His performance on the football field wasn&#8217;t altered by crimes he committed 15 years after he retired from the sport. Do you intend to remove Lawrence Taylor as well following his recent conviction, which also occurred long after his retirement? They earned their achievements on the field. That has nothing to do with what happened years later.</p>
<p>Alex Karras <em>admitted</em> placing bets on NFL games <em>while playing in the league</em>. That&#8217;s why he&#8217;s not in the Hall of Fame.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Deb</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/02/07/hall-of-fame-process-still-needs-to-be-changed/#comment-1566128</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Deb]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 19:45:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=230045#comment-1566128</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@krashie21 ...

Joe Namath and Lynn Swann ... lesser lights? That&#039;s absurd. The game has never had a brighter light than Joe Namath. The Hall of Fame is not about comparing the statistics of someone who played in the 20s or the 60s or the 70s to someone on your fantasy team in 2011. It&#039;s about the IMPACT a player had on the game during the time he played. Player eligibility should &lt;em&gt;only&lt;/em&gt; be about what that individual meant to the game &lt;em&gt;in his time&lt;/em&gt;. If you don&#039;t understand what Joe Namath and Lynn Swann meant to the game in their time ... please put down the game controller and try studying NFL history.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@krashie21 &#8230;</p>
<p>Joe Namath and Lynn Swann &#8230; lesser lights? That&#8217;s absurd. The game has never had a brighter light than Joe Namath. The Hall of Fame is not about comparing the statistics of someone who played in the 20s or the 60s or the 70s to someone on your fantasy team in 2011. It&#8217;s about the IMPACT a player had on the game during the time he played. Player eligibility should <em>only</em> be about what that individual meant to the game <em>in his time</em>. If you don&#8217;t understand what Joe Namath and Lynn Swann meant to the game in their time &#8230; please put down the game controller and try studying NFL history.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Deb</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/02/07/hall-of-fame-process-still-needs-to-be-changed/#comment-1566108</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Deb]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 19:37:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=230045#comment-1566108</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mike, you &lt;em&gt;have to&lt;/em&gt; name names. I&#039;m not in a position to know which of these voters lacks experience, historical context, or has an ax to grind. As Whitlock said last year, you have a powerful voice now--&lt;em&gt;use it&lt;/em&gt;. I frequently disagree with you, but that&#039;s okay. What&#039;s the point of having a platform like this if you only make safe statements? Give &#039;em heck!

It&#039;s obscene that these decisions are made solely by a handful of pompous reporters who can exclude some of the greatest in the game because they didn&#039;t kiss up to the media. And if voters can&#039;t fit the deserving people into the class ... expand the class. You&#039;ve got some great ideas. It&#039;s time the NFL started listening to the FANS.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mike, you <em>have to</em> name names. I&#8217;m not in a position to know which of these voters lacks experience, historical context, or has an ax to grind. As Whitlock said last year, you have a powerful voice now&#8211;<em>use it</em>. I frequently disagree with you, but that&#8217;s okay. What&#8217;s the point of having a platform like this if you only make safe statements? Give &#8216;em heck!</p>
<p>It&#8217;s obscene that these decisions are made solely by a handful of pompous reporters who can exclude some of the greatest in the game because they didn&#8217;t kiss up to the media. And if voters can&#8217;t fit the deserving people into the class &#8230; expand the class. You&#8217;ve got some great ideas. It&#8217;s time the NFL started listening to the FANS.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rgledz</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/02/07/hall-of-fame-process-still-needs-to-be-changed/#comment-1566107</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[rgledz]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 19:36:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=230045#comment-1566107</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@ Steelfan....

Steelfan says. &quot;Cris Carter got cut from Philly. Hall of Famers do not get cut. Sorry, no excuses. You are in the Hall of Very Good&quot;.......

I have a giant hole for your theory.  Johnny Unitas, cut by the Steelers in 1955.  You knew that though, right big Steelers fan?  Got any excuses for me now smart guy?  Peyton Manning is more than likely going to be cut next month.........are you going to tell me that he&#039;s not a HOFer?  I&#039;m done wasting my time on you.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Steelfan&#8230;.</p>
<p>Steelfan says. &#8220;Cris Carter got cut from Philly. Hall of Famers do not get cut. Sorry, no excuses. You are in the Hall of Very Good&#8221;&#8230;&#8230;.</p>
<p>I have a giant hole for your theory.  Johnny Unitas, cut by the Steelers in 1955.  You knew that though, right big Steelers fan?  Got any excuses for me now smart guy?  Peyton Manning is more than likely going to be cut next month&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;are you going to tell me that he&#8217;s not a HOFer?  I&#8217;m done wasting my time on you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sdelmonte</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/02/07/hall-of-fame-process-still-needs-to-be-changed/#comment-1566062</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[sdelmonte]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 19:22:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=230045#comment-1566062</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[That list isn&#039;t that bad.  I see a fair number of reporters I respect, and a fair number who represent the Internet and not stodgy old print publications.  At the very least, it&#039;s a better group of voters than those who pick baseball&#039;s HoFers.  And as far as I can tell, there is no sign of the bizarre reasoning that is keeping Jeff Bagwell out of that hall because there is a chance he used steroids.  (Not that anyone in football gets worked up about that the way they do in baseball.)  And it&#039;s still easier to get in for football than baseball.  When was the last time five baseball players went in the same year?

That said, more transparency is needed.  It would do the football hall a lot of good if more voters explained their votes.  I also think that the voting process is cumbersome and would be better replaced with the straight &quot;one vote, 75% vote of yes gets in&quot; of baseball.  

Ideally, sportwriters shouldn&#039;t be the only judges.  There are bias and conflict of interest issues.  But the same would be said of any other process.  The system could be better, but it&#039;s not that bad this way.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That list isn&#8217;t that bad.  I see a fair number of reporters I respect, and a fair number who represent the Internet and not stodgy old print publications.  At the very least, it&#8217;s a better group of voters than those who pick baseball&#8217;s HoFers.  And as far as I can tell, there is no sign of the bizarre reasoning that is keeping Jeff Bagwell out of that hall because there is a chance he used steroids.  (Not that anyone in football gets worked up about that the way they do in baseball.)  And it&#8217;s still easier to get in for football than baseball.  When was the last time five baseball players went in the same year?</p>
<p>That said, more transparency is needed.  It would do the football hall a lot of good if more voters explained their votes.  I also think that the voting process is cumbersome and would be better replaced with the straight &#8220;one vote, 75% vote of yes gets in&#8221; of baseball.  </p>
<p>Ideally, sportwriters shouldn&#8217;t be the only judges.  There are bias and conflict of interest issues.  But the same would be said of any other process.  The system could be better, but it&#8217;s not that bad this way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: movementarians</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/02/07/hall-of-fame-process-still-needs-to-be-changed/#comment-1566012</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[movementarians]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 19:08:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=230045#comment-1566012</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wow. I can’t believe he is chastising someone for using the ad hominem logical fallacy (attack on character) or any other logical fallacy? That seems a bit hypocritical for a web site that commonly posts editorial style articles, with emotionally manipulative headlines, to mislead the reader into forming an opinion before even reading the article. Try writing more than 2 articles in a row where you aren’t taking someone’s comments out of context and then you can criticize people for coming across as “over the top.”]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow. I can’t believe he is chastising someone for using the ad hominem logical fallacy (attack on character) or any other logical fallacy? That seems a bit hypocritical for a web site that commonly posts editorial style articles, with emotionally manipulative headlines, to mislead the reader into forming an opinion before even reading the article. Try writing more than 2 articles in a row where you aren’t taking someone’s comments out of context and then you can criticize people for coming across as “over the top.”</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: august589</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/02/07/hall-of-fame-process-still-needs-to-be-changed/#comment-1565996</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[august589]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 18:59:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=230045#comment-1565996</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Can someone please explain how Joe Namath gets in and not Ken Anderson..

---------------------------------------------------

Sure, I&#039;ll explain it.  Namath brought credibility to the American Football League in the mid-1960s like no one else could have. If Namath signs with the Cardinals instead of the Jets in 1965, I submit that there may have been no merger between the NFL and AFL, no Super Bowl, and fewer professional football teams in this nation.  Namath attracted fans to AFL stadiums, he was talked about constantly, and he had &quot;it.&quot;  In other words, he was the Tim Tebow of his day (though a better passer coming out of college). 

Remember, it&#039;s called the Hall of FAME, not the Hall of Statistics.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can someone please explain how Joe Namath gets in and not Ken Anderson..</p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;</p>
<p>Sure, I&#8217;ll explain it.  Namath brought credibility to the American Football League in the mid-1960s like no one else could have. If Namath signs with the Cardinals instead of the Jets in 1965, I submit that there may have been no merger between the NFL and AFL, no Super Bowl, and fewer professional football teams in this nation.  Namath attracted fans to AFL stadiums, he was talked about constantly, and he had &#8220;it.&#8221;  In other words, he was the Tim Tebow of his day (though a better passer coming out of college). </p>
<p>Remember, it&#8217;s called the Hall of FAME, not the Hall of Statistics.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chitownjeff</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/02/07/hall-of-fame-process-still-needs-to-be-changed/#comment-1565969</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[chitownjeff]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 18:52:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=230045#comment-1565969</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Parcells overrated. He never won a super bowl without LT on it. Coulda easily blown super bowl on the first round. Underachieved in Dallas. Did nothing for Miami at all. Very loud big personality, but not as great as a coach or front office man as he is built up to be. Just super quotable. Not necessarily hall of famer. Sorry.

Cris Carter got cut from Philly. Hall of Famers do not get cut. Sorry, no excuses. You are in the Hall of Very Good.

Swann was on team of fabulous running and they did not need to throw much with great defenses. Swann was rookie of year, great return man, super clutch and athletic with 4 rings. Super hands, fast and he and Stallworth were unstoppable.

If Swann played on a team thowing constantly in a dome, he would have big numbers too. Put Carter on Steelers, he might be a tight end.

Did you.. or are you old enough to have actually seen Lynn play? Lynn made big plays.. but John Stallworth was the better receiver.. tougher.. better hands.. consistent performer.. made thebig third down catches that win games.. That was CC excelled at.. he was cut because they wanted to wake him up from his Coke problem. Dallas did same with Hollywood but he didn&#039;t get it. 
 Bellicheck hasn&#039;t won a superbowl without Brady.. that is as stupid as your.. Parcells never won a superbowl without LT comment. Noll never won a SB without Bradshaw.. however if you knew anything you&#039;d know that Bradshaw was instrumental in the last three super bowls.. the first notsomuch..]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Parcells overrated. He never won a super bowl without LT on it. Coulda easily blown super bowl on the first round. Underachieved in Dallas. Did nothing for Miami at all. Very loud big personality, but not as great as a coach or front office man as he is built up to be. Just super quotable. Not necessarily hall of famer. Sorry.</p>
<p>Cris Carter got cut from Philly. Hall of Famers do not get cut. Sorry, no excuses. You are in the Hall of Very Good.</p>
<p>Swann was on team of fabulous running and they did not need to throw much with great defenses. Swann was rookie of year, great return man, super clutch and athletic with 4 rings. Super hands, fast and he and Stallworth were unstoppable.</p>
<p>If Swann played on a team thowing constantly in a dome, he would have big numbers too. Put Carter on Steelers, he might be a tight end.</p>
<p>Did you.. or are you old enough to have actually seen Lynn play? Lynn made big plays.. but John Stallworth was the better receiver.. tougher.. better hands.. consistent performer.. made thebig third down catches that win games.. That was CC excelled at.. he was cut because they wanted to wake him up from his Coke problem. Dallas did same with Hollywood but he didn&#8217;t get it.<br />
 Bellicheck hasn&#8217;t won a superbowl without Brady.. that is as stupid as your.. Parcells never won a superbowl without LT comment. Noll never won a SB without Bradshaw.. however if you knew anything you&#8217;d know that Bradshaw was instrumental in the last three super bowls.. the first notsomuch..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rufustfireflyjr</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/02/07/hall-of-fame-process-still-needs-to-be-changed/#comment-1565966</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[rufustfireflyjr]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 18:51:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=230045#comment-1565966</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[steeelfann says: 
Feb 7, 2012 12:35 PM 

&quot;Cris Carter got cut from Philly. Hall of Famers do not get cut.&quot;

First of all, Carter got cut for his prodigious use of recreational drugs, not because he couldn&#039;t play. Second, Johnny Unitas got cut (by your beloved Steelers, no less), then went on to a HOF career with the Colts. Maybe Cris carter will make it, maybe not. But let&#039;s get our facts straight before we hit &quot;submit.&quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>steeelfann says:<br />
Feb 7, 2012 12:35 PM </p>
<p>&#8220;Cris Carter got cut from Philly. Hall of Famers do not get cut.&#8221;</p>
<p>First of all, Carter got cut for his prodigious use of recreational drugs, not because he couldn&#8217;t play. Second, Johnny Unitas got cut (by your beloved Steelers, no less), then went on to a HOF career with the Colts. Maybe Cris carter will make it, maybe not. But let&#8217;s get our facts straight before we hit &#8220;submit.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nyjalleffingday</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/02/07/hall-of-fame-process-still-needs-to-be-changed/#comment-1565950</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[nyjalleffingday]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 18:46:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=230045#comment-1565950</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@footballnut2011

He is in primarily for his contributions to the game of football, sort of like Sabol, in a way. Namath was the first 4k yard passer ever, he did it in a totally different era, helped revolutionize the game with his style on and off the field, and as the face of the New York Jets franchise and basically the AFL itself, he led the Jets to a victory in one of the most important, if not the most important Super Bowl of all time. He did all this, mind you, after getting a timetable of around 6 years to play from the Jets medical staff after being drafted, because of how awful his knees were. When you say &quot;Why is Joe Namath in the Hall of Fame, look at his stats!&quot; you immediately identify yourself as someone who has no appreciation and/or knowledge of the game that you love today.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@footballnut2011</p>
<p>He is in primarily for his contributions to the game of football, sort of like Sabol, in a way. Namath was the first 4k yard passer ever, he did it in a totally different era, helped revolutionize the game with his style on and off the field, and as the face of the New York Jets franchise and basically the AFL itself, he led the Jets to a victory in one of the most important, if not the most important Super Bowl of all time. He did all this, mind you, after getting a timetable of around 6 years to play from the Jets medical staff after being drafted, because of how awful his knees were. When you say &#8220;Why is Joe Namath in the Hall of Fame, look at his stats!&#8221; you immediately identify yourself as someone who has no appreciation and/or knowledge of the game that you love today.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: melikefootball</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/02/07/hall-of-fame-process-still-needs-to-be-changed/#comment-1565923</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[melikefootball]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 18:36:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=230045#comment-1565923</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Don&#039;t you just love how guys like Jason Whitlock, because they have the camera in front of them know everything.  The media is half the problem with a lot of things in sports people don&#039;t care for. Where did he come from anyhow???]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t you just love how guys like Jason Whitlock, because they have the camera in front of them know everything.  The media is half the problem with a lot of things in sports people don&#8217;t care for. Where did he come from anyhow???</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: melikefootball</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/02/07/hall-of-fame-process-still-needs-to-be-changed/#comment-1565920</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[melikefootball]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 18:33:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=230045#comment-1565920</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What is it with CC ,there are many players that  deserve consideration just as much.  CC always is beating his chest and has his brothers on ESPN jump up and down for him,   so he should be in. Just because he has a podium to speak from does not make him souls sayer he needs in now. Many have been passed over or even forgotten that deserve just as much consideration.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What is it with CC ,there are many players that  deserve consideration just as much.  CC always is beating his chest and has his brothers on ESPN jump up and down for him,   so he should be in. Just because he has a podium to speak from does not make him souls sayer he needs in now. Many have been passed over or even forgotten that deserve just as much consideration.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: geauxjay</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/02/07/hall-of-fame-process-still-needs-to-be-changed/#comment-1565903</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[geauxjay]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 18:27:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=230045#comment-1565903</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[By the way, do you think it&#039;s a coincidence that the two people who are being whined about the most work for ESPN or have worked for ESPN?

It&#039;s a shame that Andre Reed can&#039;t get a TV job.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By the way, do you think it&#8217;s a coincidence that the two people who are being whined about the most work for ESPN or have worked for ESPN?</p>
<p>It&#8217;s a shame that Andre Reed can&#8217;t get a TV job.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: geauxjay</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/02/07/hall-of-fame-process-still-needs-to-be-changed/#comment-1565898</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[geauxjay]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 18:25:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=230045#comment-1565898</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Give me a break on Parcells. The guy runs his mouth that he &quot;buys the groceries,&quot; but he would have ZERO Super Bowl victories if he wouldn&#039;t have INHERITED Lawrence Taylor, Phil Simms, and Harry Carson.

Definiton of a &quot;hypocrite.&quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Give me a break on Parcells. The guy runs his mouth that he &#8220;buys the groceries,&#8221; but he would have ZERO Super Bowl victories if he wouldn&#8217;t have INHERITED Lawrence Taylor, Phil Simms, and Harry Carson.</p>
<p>Definiton of a &#8220;hypocrite.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dexterismyhero</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/02/07/hall-of-fame-process-still-needs-to-be-changed/#comment-1565894</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[dexterismyhero]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 18:23:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=230045#comment-1565894</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@bigjdve says:Feb 7, 2012 10:03 AM 
Do you really think that Andre Reed or Chris Carter were as good as Steve Largent, Lynn Swann, or Jerry Rice for that matter? I am sorry they weren’t/ aren’t in the same vicinity. 
=================================
Not as good as Jerry Rice, but every bit as good as Swann or Largent. Just because he may not have been a good person during that time is not a reason to not let him in. 
Hell, Swann only had 336 career receptions.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@bigjdve says:Feb 7, 2012 10:03 AM<br />
Do you really think that Andre Reed or Chris Carter were as good as Steve Largent, Lynn Swann, or Jerry Rice for that matter? I am sorry they weren’t/ aren’t in the same vicinity.<br />
=================================<br />
Not as good as Jerry Rice, but every bit as good as Swann or Largent. Just because he may not have been a good person during that time is not a reason to not let him in.<br />
Hell, Swann only had 336 career receptions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: steveoz49</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/02/07/hall-of-fame-process-still-needs-to-be-changed/#comment-1565889</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[steveoz49]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 18:21:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=230045#comment-1565889</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Chris Carter better hands than Jerry Rice?????? Chris Carter was known for his sideline catches, sure, i&#039;ll give you that.  While Chris was making sideline catches, Jerry was running slant routes and making catches between LB&#039;s... 

Jerry&#039;s Hands &gt;  EVERYONE else

You can&#039;t have &quot;good&quot; hands and have all of his records... that&#039;s why he&#039;s the G.O.A.T.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chris Carter better hands than Jerry Rice?????? Chris Carter was known for his sideline catches, sure, i&#8217;ll give you that.  While Chris was making sideline catches, Jerry was running slant routes and making catches between LB&#8217;s&#8230; </p>
<p>Jerry&#8217;s Hands &gt;  EVERYONE else</p>
<p>You can&#8217;t have &#8220;good&#8221; hands and have all of his records&#8230; that&#8217;s why he&#8217;s the G.O.A.T.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cosmoman11</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/02/07/hall-of-fame-process-still-needs-to-be-changed/#comment-1565887</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[cosmoman11]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 18:21:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=230045#comment-1565887</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Cris wasn&#039;t even the best Carter on the Vikings in the early 90&#039;s.  Go AC.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cris wasn&#8217;t even the best Carter on the Vikings in the early 90&#8242;s.  Go AC.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dexterismyhero</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/02/07/hall-of-fame-process-still-needs-to-be-changed/#comment-1565870</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[dexterismyhero]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 18:13:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=230045#comment-1565870</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Take Lynn Swann out and put in Carter...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Take Lynn Swann out and put in Carter&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ernie ernie</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/02/07/hall-of-fame-process-still-needs-to-be-changed/#comment-1565860</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ernie ernie]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 18:08:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=230045#comment-1565860</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Carter had some of the best hands I&#039;ve ever seen.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Carter had some of the best hands I&#8217;ve ever seen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nivekred</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/02/07/hall-of-fame-process-still-needs-to-be-changed/#comment-1565858</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[nivekred]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 18:06:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=230045#comment-1565858</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Lynn Swann 4 Super Bowl Rings including an MVP of the Super Bowl. Chris Carter no Rings no MVP. Just saying!!!!  But Chris should be in! Swann was in a non-passing era even with Bradshaw as QB.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lynn Swann 4 Super Bowl Rings including an MVP of the Super Bowl. Chris Carter no Rings no MVP. Just saying!!!!  But Chris should be in! Swann was in a non-passing era even with Bradshaw as QB.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sj39</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/02/07/hall-of-fame-process-still-needs-to-be-changed/#comment-1565839</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[sj39]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 17:58:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=230045#comment-1565839</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[geefan1, since you know very little about league history can you at least google Al Davis and read his wiki page. You&#039;ll learn a lot about how the league as we know it today was formed and what a massive role he played.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>geefan1, since you know very little about league history can you at least google Al Davis and read his wiki page. You&#8217;ll learn a lot about how the league as we know it today was formed and what a massive role he played.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: canadian52niner</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/02/07/hall-of-fame-process-still-needs-to-be-changed/#comment-1565835</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[canadian52niner]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 17:55:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=230045#comment-1565835</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What is with all the whining over Parcells???  He was a good, but not great coach and a good but not great executive.

Where is the love for DeBartolo???  He was a revolutionary owner that in cooperation with Bill Walsh served as the model for how franchises should operate.  He won 5 superbowls and was always a class act!!!

Anyone who brings up the Louisiana gambling incident should do some research and then think about Michael Irvin and his cocaine history and then realize anything outside of football should not be considered!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What is with all the whining over Parcells???  He was a good, but not great coach and a good but not great executive.</p>
<p>Where is the love for DeBartolo???  He was a revolutionary owner that in cooperation with Bill Walsh served as the model for how franchises should operate.  He won 5 superbowls and was always a class act!!!</p>
<p>Anyone who brings up the Louisiana gambling incident should do some research and then think about Michael Irvin and his cocaine history and then realize anything outside of football should not be considered!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sasquash20</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/02/07/hall-of-fame-process-still-needs-to-be-changed/#comment-1565823</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[sasquash20]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 17:52:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=230045#comment-1565823</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When it comes to Carter I think he will get in and he should. But Tim Brown should be in before Carter and the numbers say this much. Brown had over 5,000 more all purpose yards. More receiving yards on about the same amount of catches as Carter. Carter had 8 straight seasons over a 1,000 receiving yards, Tim Brown had 9 straight seasons over a 1,000 yards. Carter has a edge in TDs but both have over a 100. A.Reed is another WR I think should be in, but only after Brown and Carter.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When it comes to Carter I think he will get in and he should. But Tim Brown should be in before Carter and the numbers say this much. Brown had over 5,000 more all purpose yards. More receiving yards on about the same amount of catches as Carter. Carter had 8 straight seasons over a 1,000 receiving yards, Tim Brown had 9 straight seasons over a 1,000 yards. Carter has a edge in TDs but both have over a 100. A.Reed is another WR I think should be in, but only after Brown and Carter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: whyalwaysthehate</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/02/07/hall-of-fame-process-still-needs-to-be-changed/#comment-1565798</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[whyalwaysthehate]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 17:43:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=230045#comment-1565798</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[No HOF for you Chris Carter.

Not a winner, and a lot of garbage time yardage. 

Complainer, me-only player, and doesn&#039;t represent the best of his time in the league.

Rice is similar in character, but has the rings. You can argue if the SF QBs made him or he made them, but the results stand.

Child, please not Chris Carter.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No HOF for you Chris Carter.</p>
<p>Not a winner, and a lot of garbage time yardage. </p>
<p>Complainer, me-only player, and doesn&#8217;t represent the best of his time in the league.</p>
<p>Rice is similar in character, but has the rings. You can argue if the SF QBs made him or he made them, but the results stand.</p>
<p>Child, please not Chris Carter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: geefan1</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/02/07/hall-of-fame-process-still-needs-to-be-changed/#comment-1565794</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[geefan1]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 17:42:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=230045#comment-1565794</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[terrellpryorstattooartist says: Feb 7, 2012 11:26 AM

The fact the a couple jerkoffs from Cleveland are keeping art modell out of the hall of fame but al “sue the NFL multiple times” Davis is in there and was praised like christ after he died. Art did more for the league then half the guys in the hall. He’s the reason the NFL has tv contracts with major networks which last time I checked was the NFL’s main source of revenue is it not?

------------------------

It may be reasonable to debate whether Crazy Al belongs in the HOF, but Modell clearly does not. 

He ran one of the league&#039;s most well-supported teams to the verge of bankruptcy, moved it to get a Hail Mary  financial bailout, and then had to sell it anyway. In the multi-billion dollar world of the NFL, you&#039;ve got to be a special kind of stupid to go broke. 

Financial solvency should be a minimum criteria for considerarion of an owner for the HOF.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>terrellpryorstattooartist says: Feb 7, 2012 11:26 AM</p>
<p>The fact the a couple jerkoffs from Cleveland are keeping art modell out of the hall of fame but al “sue the NFL multiple times” Davis is in there and was praised like christ after he died. Art did more for the league then half the guys in the hall. He’s the reason the NFL has tv contracts with major networks which last time I checked was the NFL’s main source of revenue is it not?</p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;</p>
<p>It may be reasonable to debate whether Crazy Al belongs in the HOF, but Modell clearly does not. </p>
<p>He ran one of the league&#8217;s most well-supported teams to the verge of bankruptcy, moved it to get a Hail Mary  financial bailout, and then had to sell it anyway. In the multi-billion dollar world of the NFL, you&#8217;ve got to be a special kind of stupid to go broke. </p>
<p>Financial solvency should be a minimum criteria for considerarion of an owner for the HOF.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
