<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: McKenzie starts to whack &#8220;out of whack&#8221; contracts</title>
	<atom:link href="http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/02/10/mckenzie-starts-to-whack-out-of-whack-contracts/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/02/10/mckenzie-starts-to-whack-out-of-whack-contracts/</link>
	<description>ProFootballTalk on NBCSports.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 00:58:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: noid25</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/02/10/mckenzie-starts-to-whack-out-of-whack-contracts/#comment-1574254</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[noid25]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 12:19:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=236223#comment-1574254</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I love Mr Davis but,  he mad some horrible moves and draft picks over the years.  The Raiders are long over due for an overhaul.  It made no sense to give Kelly and Rout all that money!   A lot of his draft picks were wasted too!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love Mr Davis but,  he mad some horrible moves and draft picks over the years.  The Raiders are long over due for an overhaul.  It made no sense to give Kelly and Rout all that money!   A lot of his draft picks were wasted too!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: marcsasharc</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/02/10/mckenzie-starts-to-whack-out-of-whack-contracts/#comment-1574027</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[marcsasharc]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 00:52:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=236223#comment-1574027</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[lol nuclearwarfare,

take a course on logic/rhetoric/debate. you will understand the flaws in your logic. peace 

:)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>lol nuclearwarfare,</p>
<p>take a course on logic/rhetoric/debate. you will understand the flaws in your logic. peace<br />
 <img src='http://s0.wp.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: truthhammer</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/02/10/mckenzie-starts-to-whack-out-of-whack-contracts/#comment-1573959</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[truthhammer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 23:28:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=236223#comment-1573959</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In general, I support this stuff, but some things I&#039;m hearing are making me a little apprehensive.

Switching to a 3-4?  Considering we have 4 good lineman and no good linebackers, and we don&#039;t even have 4 draft picks, that sounds flat out idiotic.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In general, I support this stuff, but some things I&#8217;m hearing are making me a little apprehensive.</p>
<p>Switching to a 3-4?  Considering we have 4 good lineman and no good linebackers, and we don&#8217;t even have 4 draft picks, that sounds flat out idiotic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: georgebrett</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/02/10/mckenzie-starts-to-whack-out-of-whack-contracts/#comment-1573388</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[georgebrett]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 17:12:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=236223#comment-1573388</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If he concentrates solely on defense we will make to at least the 2nd round of the playoffs next year.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If he concentrates solely on defense we will make to at least the 2nd round of the playoffs next year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joetoronto</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/02/10/mckenzie-starts-to-whack-out-of-whack-contracts/#comment-1573105</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[joetoronto]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 10:04:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=236223#comment-1573105</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[marcsasharc says:
Feb 10, 2012 3:11 PM
You guys actually call BB a defensive coach lmfao.
***************************************************
People say the craziest things here but honestly, you take the friggin cake.

Over and over, you say things that are so wrong, it&#039;s hard to fathom someone actually saying them.

I&#039;d be hard pressed to name someone here who knows less about football than you.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>marcsasharc says:<br />
Feb 10, 2012 3:11 PM<br />
You guys actually call BB a defensive coach lmfao.<br />
***************************************************<br />
People say the craziest things here but honestly, you take the friggin cake.</p>
<p>Over and over, you say things that are so wrong, it&#8217;s hard to fathom someone actually saying them.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d be hard pressed to name someone here who knows less about football than you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rodster213</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/02/10/mckenzie-starts-to-whack-out-of-whack-contracts/#comment-1573097</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[rodster213]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 08:53:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=236223#comment-1573097</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[oldhighs, 
 Seymour is the oldest by 14 months. Kelly just looks like that old fat rapper but he&#039;s just 31, Seymour will be 33 in October.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>oldhighs,<br />
 Seymour is the oldest by 14 months. Kelly just looks like that old fat rapper but he&#8217;s just 31, Seymour will be 33 in October.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rodster213</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/02/10/mckenzie-starts-to-whack-out-of-whack-contracts/#comment-1573095</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[rodster213]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 08:46:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=236223#comment-1573095</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For the one&#039;s that think the Raiders didn&#039;t have any $$ to go after Aso last yr, that is not true. Al did not want Aso back in Oakland and never offerred him a contract even though Aso wanted that to occur. Hue Jackson even asked Al to offer Aso a contract yet the senile one refused. Now look what we have, exactly what I stated last season. Garbage. However, I believe in Reggie and he will get this turned around. $$man has spoken.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For the one&#8217;s that think the Raiders didn&#8217;t have any $$ to go after Aso last yr, that is not true. Al did not want Aso back in Oakland and never offerred him a contract even though Aso wanted that to occur. Hue Jackson even asked Al to offer Aso a contract yet the senile one refused. Now look what we have, exactly what I stated last season. Garbage. However, I believe in Reggie and he will get this turned around. $$man has spoken.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bittersportspills</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/02/10/mckenzie-starts-to-whack-out-of-whack-contracts/#comment-1573055</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[bittersportspills]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 05:39:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=236223#comment-1573055</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Too funny, the whine about the Raiders no longer being &quot;the Raiders&quot;. Have you seen this team play anytime in the past 10 years? The old Raiders of Flores and Madden years are long gone.

The players aren&#039;t the same players. The old school players would reciprocate Mr. Davis&#039; trust in them by playing hard and smart. Today&#039;s players might as well have come into camp with guns and wearing ski masks. Need we mention JaBustus Russell, who literally stole $32 million from the team?

I like McKenzie coming in and &quot;cleaning out the stables&quot;, if that&#039;s what he&#039;s going to do. It&#039;s long overdue. The Raiders need football talent, not sprinters. Routt was an average talent Davis tried to make into an NFL starter by giving him a big check. Its ok to bring raw talent in and try to develop it, but if they show no signs of getting better, they need to move on. You don&#039;t make a mistake by expanding it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Too funny, the whine about the Raiders no longer being &#8220;the Raiders&#8221;. Have you seen this team play anytime in the past 10 years? The old Raiders of Flores and Madden years are long gone.</p>
<p>The players aren&#8217;t the same players. The old school players would reciprocate Mr. Davis&#8217; trust in them by playing hard and smart. Today&#8217;s players might as well have come into camp with guns and wearing ski masks. Need we mention JaBustus Russell, who literally stole $32 million from the team?</p>
<p>I like McKenzie coming in and &#8220;cleaning out the stables&#8221;, if that&#8217;s what he&#8217;s going to do. It&#8217;s long overdue. The Raiders need football talent, not sprinters. Routt was an average talent Davis tried to make into an NFL starter by giving him a big check. Its ok to bring raw talent in and try to develop it, but if they show no signs of getting better, they need to move on. You don&#8217;t make a mistake by expanding it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: murfdeezy</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/02/10/mckenzie-starts-to-whack-out-of-whack-contracts/#comment-1573018</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[murfdeezy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 04:29:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=236223#comment-1573018</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I love this move. If you all haven&#039;t noticed yet...most of the dead money is on the defensive side of the ball, which also happens to be the side of the ball that has stunk it up. He is sending a clear message and setting the tone for the way this team will operate in the future. It is a crucial move with the loss of Mr. Davis to establish some ground rules and expectations...a baseline for how the organization will be run moving forward, so there is no confusion. 

Al was a brilliant man and as much a warm heart as a calculated killer. However, as he got older he lost his edge. He didn&#039;t have the insight or the energy to put in the hours these younger guys do. That is not a discredit to him. All of you saying that the Raiders died with Al are drama queens. Al&#039;s legend lives on with that team...so you jokers jump ship....and in the same breath have the audacity to talk about how loyal Al was. Al would have shipped you sorry A holes out of Oakland. Bye...don&#039;t call, don&#039;t write.

As for the rest of us logical and loyal Raider fans...we know that we have to send a message to the free loaders and be more fiscally responsible in order to build a functional team. Draft players, not combine stars. It is not an opinion that our players are overpaid, it&#039;s fact when compared to their peers contracts. It&#039;s not an opinion that the majority of our draft picks under perform or drop off the map. Just look at the rosters and the previous draft picks...and stats if you like. 

I want our old Raider mystique back as bad as any fan on here, but it has been gone for a long time. The only reputation we have had for, at the very least the last decade, is that we are the dysfunctional idiots everyone laughs at and makes fun of. That is not an opinion either. You see it on ESPN, you see it when any analysts are talking about the Raiders. You read it in the papers. For god sake, I hate to hear it, but the whole rest of the world is not wrong. The best way to correct that is to admit you have a problem and then you start taking small steps to fix it. If we cut all that dead weight...I still think we are playoff contenders next year, honestly. In a few years, I see perennial division champs. This is the first time I have been this optimistic in a long time.

Long live the Silver and Black! Just win baby!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love this move. If you all haven&#8217;t noticed yet&#8230;most of the dead money is on the defensive side of the ball, which also happens to be the side of the ball that has stunk it up. He is sending a clear message and setting the tone for the way this team will operate in the future. It is a crucial move with the loss of Mr. Davis to establish some ground rules and expectations&#8230;a baseline for how the organization will be run moving forward, so there is no confusion. </p>
<p>Al was a brilliant man and as much a warm heart as a calculated killer. However, as he got older he lost his edge. He didn&#8217;t have the insight or the energy to put in the hours these younger guys do. That is not a discredit to him. All of you saying that the Raiders died with Al are drama queens. Al&#8217;s legend lives on with that team&#8230;so you jokers jump ship&#8230;.and in the same breath have the audacity to talk about how loyal Al was. Al would have shipped you sorry A holes out of Oakland. Bye&#8230;don&#8217;t call, don&#8217;t write.</p>
<p>As for the rest of us logical and loyal Raider fans&#8230;we know that we have to send a message to the free loaders and be more fiscally responsible in order to build a functional team. Draft players, not combine stars. It is not an opinion that our players are overpaid, it&#8217;s fact when compared to their peers contracts. It&#8217;s not an opinion that the majority of our draft picks under perform or drop off the map. Just look at the rosters and the previous draft picks&#8230;and stats if you like. </p>
<p>I want our old Raider mystique back as bad as any fan on here, but it has been gone for a long time. The only reputation we have had for, at the very least the last decade, is that we are the dysfunctional idiots everyone laughs at and makes fun of. That is not an opinion either. You see it on ESPN, you see it when any analysts are talking about the Raiders. You read it in the papers. For god sake, I hate to hear it, but the whole rest of the world is not wrong. The best way to correct that is to admit you have a problem and then you start taking small steps to fix it. If we cut all that dead weight&#8230;I still think we are playoff contenders next year, honestly. In a few years, I see perennial division champs. This is the first time I have been this optimistic in a long time.</p>
<p>Long live the Silver and Black! Just win baby!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: slickster35</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/02/10/mckenzie-starts-to-whack-out-of-whack-contracts/#comment-1572869</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[slickster35]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 01:15:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=236223#comment-1572869</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[raidermike34 says:Feb 10, 2012 7:56 PM 

It’s funny listening to all these RAIDER HATERS like Slickster who love to read our columns but yet they never mention who they root for..its gotta be a DONK fan or a BOLT fan and we know they aint got nothing to chat about in their world – they are close to jumping on board..welcome to Raidernation Slickster..we love ya!! Tell us something we all dont know..

---------------------------------

At least you had sense enough not to try and debate the obvious. For that you get much credit.

Chiefs fan BTW, and things are looking up, but thanks for the invite.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>raidermike34 says:Feb 10, 2012 7:56 PM </p>
<p>It’s funny listening to all these RAIDER HATERS like Slickster who love to read our columns but yet they never mention who they root for..its gotta be a DONK fan or a BOLT fan and we know they aint got nothing to chat about in their world – they are close to jumping on board..welcome to Raidernation Slickster..we love ya!! Tell us something we all dont know..</p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;</p>
<p>At least you had sense enough not to try and debate the obvious. For that you get much credit.</p>
<p>Chiefs fan BTW, and things are looking up, but thanks for the invite.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: raidermike34</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/02/10/mckenzie-starts-to-whack-out-of-whack-contracts/#comment-1572855</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[raidermike34]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 00:56:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=236223#comment-1572855</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It’s funny listening to all these RAIDER HATERS like Slickster who love to read our columns but yet they never mention who they root for..its gotta be a DONK fan or a BOLT fan and we know they aint got nothing to chat about in their world - they are close to jumping on board..welcome to Raidernation Slickster..we love ya!! Tell us something we all dont know..]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It’s funny listening to all these RAIDER HATERS like Slickster who love to read our columns but yet they never mention who they root for..its gotta be a DONK fan or a BOLT fan and we know they aint got nothing to chat about in their world &#8211; they are close to jumping on board..welcome to Raidernation Slickster..we love ya!! Tell us something we all dont know..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: slickster35</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/02/10/mckenzie-starts-to-whack-out-of-whack-contracts/#comment-1572849</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[slickster35]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 00:50:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=236223#comment-1572849</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[schwinnbanger says:Feb 10, 2012 6:10 PM 

Never did agree with the HUGE salaries and LACK of play by our backfield. Regardless, I really don’t like to see the Raiders being dismantled, and I hope they use wisdom with the upcoming draft and free agency. We have, what I consider a Super Bowl calibur offense, so let’s get that defense where it needs to be. Take care all you loyal Raider Fans. Looking forward to be great season next year.

-------------------------------------

A: you have NO draft.

B: you have no money for FA.

C: you have an aging, injured offense that is hardly elite. Throw in the retread terrible OC and in reality, you have nothing.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>schwinnbanger says:Feb 10, 2012 6:10 PM </p>
<p>Never did agree with the HUGE salaries and LACK of play by our backfield. Regardless, I really don’t like to see the Raiders being dismantled, and I hope they use wisdom with the upcoming draft and free agency. We have, what I consider a Super Bowl calibur offense, so let’s get that defense where it needs to be. Take care all you loyal Raider Fans. Looking forward to be great season next year.</p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-</p>
<p>A: you have NO draft.</p>
<p>B: you have no money for FA.</p>
<p>C: you have an aging, injured offense that is hardly elite. Throw in the retread terrible OC and in reality, you have nothing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: slickster35</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/02/10/mckenzie-starts-to-whack-out-of-whack-contracts/#comment-1572843</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[slickster35]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 00:46:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=236223#comment-1572843</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#039;s funny listening to all these pack fans exuding the merits of one of their own, all while having the worst defense in the league. Good luck with all that faid fan. It&#039;s no coincidence that you need help on the defensive side of the ball much worse than the offense.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s funny listening to all these pack fans exuding the merits of one of their own, all while having the worst defense in the league. Good luck with all that faid fan. It&#8217;s no coincidence that you need help on the defensive side of the ball much worse than the offense.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: schwinnbanger</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/02/10/mckenzie-starts-to-whack-out-of-whack-contracts/#comment-1572732</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[schwinnbanger]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 23:10:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=236223#comment-1572732</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Never did agree with the HUGE salaries and LACK of play by our backfield. Regardless, I really don&#039;t like to see the Raiders being dismantled, and I hope they use wisdom with the upcoming draft and free agency. We have, what I consider a Super Bowl calibur offense, so let&#039;s get that defense where it needs to be. Take care all you loyal Raider Fans. Looking forward to be great season next year.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Never did agree with the HUGE salaries and LACK of play by our backfield. Regardless, I really don&#8217;t like to see the Raiders being dismantled, and I hope they use wisdom with the upcoming draft and free agency. We have, what I consider a Super Bowl calibur offense, so let&#8217;s get that defense where it needs to be. Take care all you loyal Raider Fans. Looking forward to be great season next year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: raiderredleg</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/02/10/mckenzie-starts-to-whack-out-of-whack-contracts/#comment-1572619</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[raiderredleg]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 22:13:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=236223#comment-1572619</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The problem isn&#039;t &quot;out of wack&quot; contracts so much as having ZERO picks through the first part of this year&#039;s draft.

This is not short term pain for the long term gain...It is freeing up ammo to RELOAD this season.

Reggie HAS TO cut salary ASAP because free agency is the ONLY way the Raiders are going to upgrade for 2012.

They had NO playmakers on defenses in 2011 and that has to be addressed ASAP.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The problem isn&#8217;t &#8220;out of wack&#8221; contracts so much as having ZERO picks through the first part of this year&#8217;s draft.</p>
<p>This is not short term pain for the long term gain&#8230;It is freeing up ammo to RELOAD this season.</p>
<p>Reggie HAS TO cut salary ASAP because free agency is the ONLY way the Raiders are going to upgrade for 2012.</p>
<p>They had NO playmakers on defenses in 2011 and that has to be addressed ASAP.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 2sausage11</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/02/10/mckenzie-starts-to-whack-out-of-whack-contracts/#comment-1572563</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[2sausage11]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 21:34:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=236223#comment-1572563</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[robertbudddwyer says: Feb 10, 2012 4:15 PM

Belichic was the Jets DEFENSIVE coordinator before being hired by the Patriots and Super Bowls and Playoffs are not logical when defining how good an NFL coach is?
=============
No but wins and loses are and I think his record is pretty good]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>robertbudddwyer says: Feb 10, 2012 4:15 PM</p>
<p>Belichic was the Jets DEFENSIVE coordinator before being hired by the Patriots and Super Bowls and Playoffs are not logical when defining how good an NFL coach is?<br />
=============<br />
No but wins and loses are and I think his record is pretty good</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: robertbudddwyer</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/02/10/mckenzie-starts-to-whack-out-of-whack-contracts/#comment-1572526</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[robertbudddwyer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 21:15:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=236223#comment-1572526</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Belichic was the Jets DEFENSIVE coordinator before being hired by the Patriots and Super Bowls and Playoffs are not logical when defining how good an NFL coach is?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Belichic was the Jets DEFENSIVE coordinator before being hired by the Patriots and Super Bowls and Playoffs are not logical when defining how good an NFL coach is?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nuclearwarfare</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/02/10/mckenzie-starts-to-whack-out-of-whack-contracts/#comment-1572511</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[nuclearwarfare]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 21:09:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=236223#comment-1572511</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;You guys actually call BB a defensive coach lmfao.&quot;

@marcasharc

I&#039;m &quot;lmfao&quot; at you for failing to understand that Belichick is a former defensive coordinator with the Giants and then a defensive backs coach with the Jets. He&#039;s dabbled on both sides of the ball, but he&#039;s known for his work on defense.

So, if I were you, I&#039;d ty really hard to NOT remember your first argument... because it&#039;s terrible and dumb.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;You guys actually call BB a defensive coach lmfao.&#8221;</p>
<p>@marcasharc</p>
<p>I&#8217;m &#8220;lmfao&#8221; at you for failing to understand that Belichick is a former defensive coordinator with the Giants and then a defensive backs coach with the Jets. He&#8217;s dabbled on both sides of the ball, but he&#8217;s known for his work on defense.</p>
<p>So, if I were you, I&#8217;d ty really hard to NOT remember your first argument&#8230; because it&#8217;s terrible and dumb.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: larrydavid7000</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/02/10/mckenzie-starts-to-whack-out-of-whack-contracts/#comment-1572480</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[larrydavid7000]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 20:59:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=236223#comment-1572480</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[just cut them baby just cut.loser of an organization.!!!!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>just cut them baby just cut.loser of an organization.!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: marcsasharc</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/02/10/mckenzie-starts-to-whack-out-of-whack-contracts/#comment-1572421</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[marcsasharc]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 20:11:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=236223#comment-1572421</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You guys actually call BB a defensive coach lmfao.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You guys actually call BB a defensive coach lmfao.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: marcsasharc</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/02/10/mckenzie-starts-to-whack-out-of-whack-contracts/#comment-1572418</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[marcsasharc]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 20:10:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=236223#comment-1572418</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Good try guys. Next time bring an actual argument that holds some weight. Or at least is logical. 

I remember my first argument. :)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good try guys. Next time bring an actual argument that holds some weight. Or at least is logical. </p>
<p>I remember my first argument. <img src='http://s0.wp.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: raidermike34</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/02/10/mckenzie-starts-to-whack-out-of-whack-contracts/#comment-1572385</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[raidermike34]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 19:46:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=236223#comment-1572385</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Where is the positivity Raidernation!! 
Plenty are complaining about these needed cuts, we accepted the short term fixes with certain players thinking we were only 1 or 2 players away from getting into the playoffs, all we did was make their wallets fatter as we got nothing in return..Accept it RaiderNation!! we are only trimming the fat, where we can use the extra $$ to sign some nice FA&#039;s that are available and  would be a big upgrade over what we have now, replacing those who do not deserve it! We have limited ourselves to the current mediocrity the last 9 years, still thinking we are still only 1-2 players away..We are not! we need solid Structure which equates to =Discipline = Wins! support the current staff as they are only opening everyone&#039;s eyes! Lets Go Silver &amp; Black in 2012!!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Where is the positivity Raidernation!!<br />
Plenty are complaining about these needed cuts, we accepted the short term fixes with certain players thinking we were only 1 or 2 players away from getting into the playoffs, all we did was make their wallets fatter as we got nothing in return..Accept it RaiderNation!! we are only trimming the fat, where we can use the extra $$ to sign some nice FA&#8217;s that are available and  would be a big upgrade over what we have now, replacing those who do not deserve it! We have limited ourselves to the current mediocrity the last 9 years, still thinking we are still only 1-2 players away..We are not! we need solid Structure which equates to =Discipline = Wins! support the current staff as they are only opening everyone&#8217;s eyes! Lets Go Silver &amp; Black in 2012!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ronlm</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/02/10/mckenzie-starts-to-whack-out-of-whack-contracts/#comment-1572376</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ronlm]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 19:42:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=236223#comment-1572376</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&gt;&gt;marcsasharc says: Quick, name 5 good head coaches in the NFL who are defensive coaches? &lt;&lt;

Bill Bellichick
Mike Tomlin
Jeff Fisher
Mike Smith
Jim Schwartz

You&#039;re point??

Can he lead men? Can he coach? Can he organize and direct a football team? These attributes are critical... not his specific mindset towards O or D.

Seriously... whether a coach has a Defensive or Offensive mindset has nothing to do with whether he is successful or not. There have been many, many extremely successful defensive HC&#039;s in the NFL.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt;&gt;marcsasharc says: Quick, name 5 good head coaches in the NFL who are defensive coaches? &lt;&lt;</p>
<p>Bill Bellichick<br />
Mike Tomlin<br />
Jeff Fisher<br />
Mike Smith<br />
Jim Schwartz</p>
<p>You&#039;re point??</p>
<p>Can he lead men? Can he coach? Can he organize and direct a football team? These attributes are critical&#8230; not his specific mindset towards O or D.</p>
<p>Seriously&#8230; whether a coach has a Defensive or Offensive mindset has nothing to do with whether he is successful or not. There have been many, many extremely successful defensive HC&#039;s in the NFL.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thebigcaptain2011</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/02/10/mckenzie-starts-to-whack-out-of-whack-contracts/#comment-1572370</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[thebigcaptain2011]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 19:38:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=236223#comment-1572370</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My dude looks like far version of Red Fox]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My dude looks like far version of Red Fox</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wcman</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/02/10/mckenzie-starts-to-whack-out-of-whack-contracts/#comment-1572348</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[wcman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 19:25:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=236223#comment-1572348</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The first of many necessary cuts I hope.  Richard Seymour and his 15 mill should be next, followed by Huff and Wimbley if they won&#039;t take a pay cut.

This idea that cutting some of these guys will lead to a couple of lean years is ridiculous.  The Raiders had the worst defense in the NFL this year and went 8-8.  Cutting these guys sure isn&#039;t going to make it any worse because it couldn&#039;t get any worse. 

Carson Palmer is due 12.5 mill which is reasonable for a starting QB and the rest of the offense is set and will return a unit that finished top ten in the league.  

The defense was the problem and is being addressed.  This is going to be a record year for FA&#039;s and there will be some good players for the Raiders to sign at much more reasonable contracts.

Good Job Reggie and keep it going.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The first of many necessary cuts I hope.  Richard Seymour and his 15 mill should be next, followed by Huff and Wimbley if they won&#8217;t take a pay cut.</p>
<p>This idea that cutting some of these guys will lead to a couple of lean years is ridiculous.  The Raiders had the worst defense in the NFL this year and went 8-8.  Cutting these guys sure isn&#8217;t going to make it any worse because it couldn&#8217;t get any worse. </p>
<p>Carson Palmer is due 12.5 mill which is reasonable for a starting QB and the rest of the offense is set and will return a unit that finished top ten in the league.  </p>
<p>The defense was the problem and is being addressed.  This is going to be a record year for FA&#8217;s and there will be some good players for the Raiders to sign at much more reasonable contracts.</p>
<p>Good Job Reggie and keep it going.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nuclearwarfare</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/02/10/mckenzie-starts-to-whack-out-of-whack-contracts/#comment-1572336</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[nuclearwarfare]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 19:18:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=236223#comment-1572336</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;The biggest issue is they hired a defensive coach as their head coach. Quick, name 5 good head coaches in the NFL who are defensive coaches? It hardly ever works nowadays. I’m sure raider fans are thrilled.&quot;

-I can think of a pretty good one right off the bat: Bill Belichick. 

I&#039;m not necessarily a fan of &quot;The Hoodie&quot; but I certainly wouldn&#039;t call him an idiot on Sundays. Then there&#039;s Mike Tomlin in Pittsburgh. Again, not a Steelers fan, but that&#039;s a handful of SB trophies between the two of them.

Should I keep going?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The biggest issue is they hired a defensive coach as their head coach. Quick, name 5 good head coaches in the NFL who are defensive coaches? It hardly ever works nowadays. I’m sure raider fans are thrilled.&#8221;</p>
<p>-I can think of a pretty good one right off the bat: Bill Belichick. </p>
<p>I&#8217;m not necessarily a fan of &#8220;The Hoodie&#8221; but I certainly wouldn&#8217;t call him an idiot on Sundays. Then there&#8217;s Mike Tomlin in Pittsburgh. Again, not a Steelers fan, but that&#8217;s a handful of SB trophies between the two of them.</p>
<p>Should I keep going?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ronlm</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/02/10/mckenzie-starts-to-whack-out-of-whack-contracts/#comment-1572331</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ronlm]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 19:15:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=236223#comment-1572331</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Curry, Wimbley, Huff and Kelly can all play ball at a high level. The only real two points against them are:

A) Having to play in an antiquated system being led by inferior coaches. John Marshall from 2010 was decent enough, but he couldn&#039;t overcome the man system Al demanded being run.

B) Their contracts. Again, can&#039;t hold this against them... not a one of us here would have declined signing those bloated offers.

I&#039;m hoping they will all step up and restructure. I think Curry was a steal, and could play very well in a 3/4. 

Wimbley could also fill a 3/4 OLB role like the Texans Mario Williams did. 

Kelly is probably is the best option for restructuring because he&#039;s in the last years of his contract... and yes, the man can play.

I don&#039;t like the thought of moving Huff to CB... but the guy balls at FS. The defense suffered when he got hurt, and he&#039;s the best playmaker we have in the secondary.

Again, it&#039;s not that these guys are slouches... they can all play and contribute at a high level. But they all must get on board with the new regime&#039;s plan, and restructure. Every one of them are expendable... they can be replaced. Get on the McKenzie driven wagon, or get kicked off. Pretty much sums it up for me.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Curry, Wimbley, Huff and Kelly can all play ball at a high level. The only real two points against them are:</p>
<p>A) Having to play in an antiquated system being led by inferior coaches. John Marshall from 2010 was decent enough, but he couldn&#8217;t overcome the man system Al demanded being run.</p>
<p>B) Their contracts. Again, can&#8217;t hold this against them&#8230; not a one of us here would have declined signing those bloated offers.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m hoping they will all step up and restructure. I think Curry was a steal, and could play very well in a 3/4. </p>
<p>Wimbley could also fill a 3/4 OLB role like the Texans Mario Williams did. </p>
<p>Kelly is probably is the best option for restructuring because he&#8217;s in the last years of his contract&#8230; and yes, the man can play.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t like the thought of moving Huff to CB&#8230; but the guy balls at FS. The defense suffered when he got hurt, and he&#8217;s the best playmaker we have in the secondary.</p>
<p>Again, it&#8217;s not that these guys are slouches&#8230; they can all play and contribute at a high level. But they all must get on board with the new regime&#8217;s plan, and restructure. Every one of them are expendable&#8230; they can be replaced. Get on the McKenzie driven wagon, or get kicked off. Pretty much sums it up for me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: robertbudddwyer</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/02/10/mckenzie-starts-to-whack-out-of-whack-contracts/#comment-1572318</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[robertbudddwyer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 19:11:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=236223#comment-1572318</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[^ Bill Belichick, Mike Tomlin, Lovie Smith, John Fox, and Rex Ryan. 

**Stats in the last 8 years**

Super Bowl Wins: 5 (6 including Dungy)
Super Bowl Appearances: 10 (12 including Dungy)
Playoff Appearances: 21 (dare include Dungy)
AFC/NFC Championship Appearances: 13 (see above for Dungy)


...I remember when I first watched football.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>^ Bill Belichick, Mike Tomlin, Lovie Smith, John Fox, and Rex Ryan. </p>
<p>**Stats in the last 8 years**</p>
<p>Super Bowl Wins: 5 (6 including Dungy)<br />
Super Bowl Appearances: 10 (12 including Dungy)<br />
Playoff Appearances: 21 (dare include Dungy)<br />
AFC/NFC Championship Appearances: 13 (see above for Dungy)</p>
<p>&#8230;I remember when I first watched football.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ninerfan94954</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/02/10/mckenzie-starts-to-whack-out-of-whack-contracts/#comment-1572282</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ninerfan94954]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 18:56:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=236223#comment-1572282</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Al was loyal to a fault and sometimes it clouded his judgement.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Al was loyal to a fault and sometimes it clouded his judgement.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: geefan1</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/02/10/mckenzie-starts-to-whack-out-of-whack-contracts/#comment-1572266</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[geefan1]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 18:49:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=236223#comment-1572266</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[___________
bcb1999 says: 
Feb 10, 2012 10:05 AM 
But, if you remain under contract, they expect you to play out your terms, and not ask for better money.

This system seems a little “out of whack”…
________

Nothing out of whack at all. When you sign that contract, it&#039;s assumed that you are going to play well and contribute to the team&#039;s success. So if you go out there and play at an all-pro level, then you&#039;ve earned the contract you already received, so there is no need to ask for more money. 

If you fail to contribute, then you&#039;ve not earned your money and you get cut. 

If players don&#039;t like that, they could sign them all to minimum contracts and give them performance incentives, so then in any given year, you&#039;d make only what your performance earns, but I don&#039;t see any players lining up for that deal.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>___________<br />
bcb1999 says:<br />
Feb 10, 2012 10:05 AM<br />
But, if you remain under contract, they expect you to play out your terms, and not ask for better money.</p>
<p>This system seems a little “out of whack”…<br />
________</p>
<p>Nothing out of whack at all. When you sign that contract, it&#8217;s assumed that you are going to play well and contribute to the team&#8217;s success. So if you go out there and play at an all-pro level, then you&#8217;ve earned the contract you already received, so there is no need to ask for more money. </p>
<p>If you fail to contribute, then you&#8217;ve not earned your money and you get cut. </p>
<p>If players don&#8217;t like that, they could sign them all to minimum contracts and give them performance incentives, so then in any given year, you&#8217;d make only what your performance earns, but I don&#8217;t see any players lining up for that deal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
