<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Forecasting the franchise tags</title>
	<atom:link href="http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/02/16/forecasting-the-franchise-tags/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/02/16/forecasting-the-franchise-tags/</link>
	<description>ProFootballTalk on NBCSports.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 00:57:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: cornersss</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/02/16/forecasting-the-franchise-tags/#comment-1584177</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[cornersss]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Feb 2012 23:06:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=257555#comment-1584177</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;“Remember that I’m choosing what I think will happen, not what should happen. The following players should at least be considered for a tag.”

Which is it, what you think will happen or what you think should happen?&quot;


People have horrible reading comprehension now a days.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;“Remember that I’m choosing what I think will happen, not what should happen. The following players should at least be considered for a tag.”</p>
<p>Which is it, what you think will happen or what you think should happen?&#8221;</p>
<p>People have horrible reading comprehension now a days.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mrw423</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/02/16/forecasting-the-franchise-tags/#comment-1584139</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[mrw423]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Feb 2012 22:15:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=257555#comment-1584139</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;Remember that I’m choosing what I think will happen, not what should happen. The following players will be considered for a tag, but I’m predicting they won’t be tagged.&quot;

So which is it? Do you predict they will or won&#039;t be tagged? Pick one.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Remember that I’m choosing what I think will happen, not what should happen. The following players will be considered for a tag, but I’m predicting they won’t be tagged.&#8221;</p>
<p>So which is it? Do you predict they will or won&#8217;t be tagged? Pick one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shadowgm1</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/02/16/forecasting-the-franchise-tags/#comment-1582152</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[shadowgm1]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2012 06:55:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=257555#comment-1582152</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Plus, he&#039;d been covered rather effectively by Chase Blackburn alone against the Giants.  He&#039;s not the &quot;matchup nightmare&quot; everyone proclaims him to be.  Linebackers alone effectively took him out of gameplans, and his inability to make plays (or even catches) in such a mismatch situation allowed defenses to choke out deep ball players like Nelson and Jennings with their safeties and rendered the offense rather useless.  It&#039;s on tape, look for yourself.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Plus, he&#8217;d been covered rather effectively by Chase Blackburn alone against the Giants.  He&#8217;s not the &#8220;matchup nightmare&#8221; everyone proclaims him to be.  Linebackers alone effectively took him out of gameplans, and his inability to make plays (or even catches) in such a mismatch situation allowed defenses to choke out deep ball players like Nelson and Jennings with their safeties and rendered the offense rather useless.  It&#8217;s on tape, look for yourself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shadowgm1</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/02/16/forecasting-the-franchise-tags/#comment-1582150</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[shadowgm1]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2012 06:50:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=257555#comment-1582150</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[johosophat says:Feb 16, 2012 2:09 PM 

I’m not sure what’s up with all the Finley hate, I think he’ll be a fan favorite after this season when he tears it up. Then everyone’ll say “I was on the Finley train all along!”. 

And if he leaves, I guess its don’t know what you got till it’s gone, and the wide open passing game from last year will have to close up without an option at TE and no mismatch to draw multiple defenders away from the other guys.
-------------------------------------------------------------

The normal gametime starting lineup cards list four wide and no TE option for Green Bay.  That&#039;s why he&#039;s been flexed out quite often and he and his agent have a leg to stand on with this WR money arguement.  Spread systems normally don&#039;t sport TE&#039;s with top pay.  Look at Ernie Conwell and Roland Williams with the Rams during the Greatest Show on Turf.  He is not a necessity, and I directly challenge anyone who claims he can improve on his lackluster performance as a Packer (outside of 2009) somewhere else.  He&#039;s streaky, and always has been.  He can&#039;t maintain an efficient high level of play for an entire season, and he&#039;s not worth top five TE money or even worthy of the conversation.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>johosophat says:Feb 16, 2012 2:09 PM </p>
<p>I’m not sure what’s up with all the Finley hate, I think he’ll be a fan favorite after this season when he tears it up. Then everyone’ll say “I was on the Finley train all along!”. </p>
<p>And if he leaves, I guess its don’t know what you got till it’s gone, and the wide open passing game from last year will have to close up without an option at TE and no mismatch to draw multiple defenders away from the other guys.<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-</p>
<p>The normal gametime starting lineup cards list four wide and no TE option for Green Bay.  That&#8217;s why he&#8217;s been flexed out quite often and he and his agent have a leg to stand on with this WR money arguement.  Spread systems normally don&#8217;t sport TE&#8217;s with top pay.  Look at Ernie Conwell and Roland Williams with the Rams during the Greatest Show on Turf.  He is not a necessity, and I directly challenge anyone who claims he can improve on his lackluster performance as a Packer (outside of 2009) somewhere else.  He&#8217;s streaky, and always has been.  He can&#8217;t maintain an efficient high level of play for an entire season, and he&#8217;s not worth top five TE money or even worthy of the conversation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shadowgm1</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/02/16/forecasting-the-franchise-tags/#comment-1582149</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[shadowgm1]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2012 06:40:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=257555#comment-1582149</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[johosophat says:Feb 16, 2012 1:17 PM 

Actually, they have a shot to get the arbitrator to side with them on WR money, thank McCarthy for that. This kid is an attitude and a problem, just because McCarthy likes him does not mean he needs to stay with the Packers (see Ryan Grant). He’s proven he’s a cancer and his bad attitude has already affected his potential. He’s shot. Good luck extorting that WR money from any other team, and good riddance Finley.
 
—————————————————————————-
 
If you are Finley’s agent you have to try and make him the most money or you are doing a disservice to him. In fact you’d be moronic not to make the WR/TE argument, I think they’ll find a middle ground. I don’t understand how he is a cancer… He really has matured and his “bad attitude” doesn’t really ever show up.
 Yeah he wanted to be in the Super Bowl picture, deservedly so, he played up until the moron Donald Lee fumbled and got him hurt in 2010.
 The Packers can’t afford to fall behind teams like the Saints and Patriots and have nothing at TE again (remember the end of the 2010 season without him?) if the Packers don’t bring him back the position looks bleak to say the least with two second year players and Quarless coming off an ACL tear.
---------------------------------------------------------------------

Respectfully, there is a reason they drafted the 2010 Mackey Award Winner in Williams last offseason.  Maturity was a rather large red flag for Finley throughout his career.  He&#039;s shown his immaturity in comments regarding team management (the team photo incident at the Super Bowl) as well as his implications as to the performance of the defense.  Facts are this team played better without him in the playoffs than with him all season long.  Argue the point as you wish, but they won a championship without &quot;Mr. Wonderful&quot; already.  It&#039;s not exactly leaving the roster in tatters with more promising prospects like Williams and Taylor.  I think it&#039;s safe to say Quarless is done, at least in the NFL.  He was having a hard enough time with separation and speed to the ball &lt;i&gt;before&lt;/i&gt; the knee injury.  He was also the first string TE in the Super Bowl with those hinderances.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>johosophat says:Feb 16, 2012 1:17 PM </p>
<p>Actually, they have a shot to get the arbitrator to side with them on WR money, thank McCarthy for that. This kid is an attitude and a problem, just because McCarthy likes him does not mean he needs to stay with the Packers (see Ryan Grant). He’s proven he’s a cancer and his bad attitude has already affected his potential. He’s shot. Good luck extorting that WR money from any other team, and good riddance Finley.</p>
<p>—————————————————————————-</p>
<p>If you are Finley’s agent you have to try and make him the most money or you are doing a disservice to him. In fact you’d be moronic not to make the WR/TE argument, I think they’ll find a middle ground. I don’t understand how he is a cancer… He really has matured and his “bad attitude” doesn’t really ever show up.<br />
 Yeah he wanted to be in the Super Bowl picture, deservedly so, he played up until the moron Donald Lee fumbled and got him hurt in 2010.<br />
 The Packers can’t afford to fall behind teams like the Saints and Patriots and have nothing at TE again (remember the end of the 2010 season without him?) if the Packers don’t bring him back the position looks bleak to say the least with two second year players and Quarless coming off an ACL tear.<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;</p>
<p>Respectfully, there is a reason they drafted the 2010 Mackey Award Winner in Williams last offseason.  Maturity was a rather large red flag for Finley throughout his career.  He&#8217;s shown his immaturity in comments regarding team management (the team photo incident at the Super Bowl) as well as his implications as to the performance of the defense.  Facts are this team played better without him in the playoffs than with him all season long.  Argue the point as you wish, but they won a championship without &#8220;Mr. Wonderful&#8221; already.  It&#8217;s not exactly leaving the roster in tatters with more promising prospects like Williams and Taylor.  I think it&#8217;s safe to say Quarless is done, at least in the NFL.  He was having a hard enough time with separation and speed to the ball <i>before</i> the knee injury.  He was also the first string TE in the Super Bowl with those hinderances.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: guvsta</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/02/16/forecasting-the-franchise-tags/#comment-1581942</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[guvsta]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2012 00:36:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=257555#comment-1581942</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[gator2006 says:
Feb 16, 2012 12:58 PM
Why doesn’t anybody talk about using a transition tag instead?
*********************************
Doesn&#039;t exist anymore- part of the new CBA.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>gator2006 says:<br />
Feb 16, 2012 12:58 PM<br />
Why doesn’t anybody talk about using a transition tag instead?<br />
*********************************<br />
Doesn&#8217;t exist anymore- part of the new CBA.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fbjule</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/02/16/forecasting-the-franchise-tags/#comment-1581831</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[fbjule]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2012 23:12:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=257555#comment-1581831</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Everyone loves finley, but the stats are what they are, he is not an elite tight end, he may become one but so might ed dickson, hernandez, gresham, fred davis, dustin keller, pettigrew......finleys best season of his career was last season, he was 24. The stats are 55 rec (14th among all TE&#039;s) 767 yards (12 among all TE&#039;s) 8 td&#039;s (3rd among all tight ends). Why should the packers give this guy big money HE HASNT DONE ANYTHING ELITE YET. he should be happy they offer him the 4 million dollar franchise tag, then come out next year ball out become a pro bowler then he will get paid. hes not in the class of ray rice, foster, dashon goldson, even desean jackson. They have all proven to be elite at there position and deserve to be paid]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Everyone loves finley, but the stats are what they are, he is not an elite tight end, he may become one but so might ed dickson, hernandez, gresham, fred davis, dustin keller, pettigrew&#8230;&#8230;finleys best season of his career was last season, he was 24. The stats are 55 rec (14th among all TE&#8217;s) 767 yards (12 among all TE&#8217;s) 8 td&#8217;s (3rd among all tight ends). Why should the packers give this guy big money HE HASNT DONE ANYTHING ELITE YET. he should be happy they offer him the 4 million dollar franchise tag, then come out next year ball out become a pro bowler then he will get paid. hes not in the class of ray rice, foster, dashon goldson, even desean jackson. They have all proven to be elite at there position and deserve to be paid</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LoCoSu@%s</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/02/16/forecasting-the-franchise-tags/#comment-1581587</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[LoCoSu@%s]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2012 20:58:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=257555#comment-1581587</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[49erjohnny says:
Feb 16, 2012 12:41 PM
Telling how no one ever brings up Alex Smith as a possibility for the franchise tag.

---------------------------

Alex will not be franchised, the 49ers will re-sign him and he does not want to go anywhere else.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>49erjohnny says:<br />
Feb 16, 2012 12:41 PM<br />
Telling how no one ever brings up Alex Smith as a possibility for the franchise tag.</p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;</p>
<p>Alex will not be franchised, the 49ers will re-sign him and he does not want to go anywhere else.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: christopher525</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/02/16/forecasting-the-franchise-tags/#comment-1581480</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[christopher525]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2012 19:57:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=257555#comment-1581480</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If Soliai hits the market, Carolina better make a move. I would prefer Pouha, even though he&#039;s an idiot, but he&#039;ll get tagged, certainly.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If Soliai hits the market, Carolina better make a move. I would prefer Pouha, even though he&#8217;s an idiot, but he&#8217;ll get tagged, certainly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: theytukrjobs</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/02/16/forecasting-the-franchise-tags/#comment-1581402</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[theytukrjobs]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2012 19:19:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=257555#comment-1581402</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Finley could successfully argue that he is a WR because that is the position that he generally lines up in.  That is how they use him.  If he gets hurt or pulled for a few plays, they don&#039;t replace his position in their base offense with a TE.  They use a WR.  They use their actual TE&#039;s the way most teams use TE&#039;s.  

He certainly is a hybrid position so maybe they can compromise but his primary role on their team is a big bodied pass catcher who lines up split wide or in the slot.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Finley could successfully argue that he is a WR because that is the position that he generally lines up in.  That is how they use him.  If he gets hurt or pulled for a few plays, they don&#8217;t replace his position in their base offense with a TE.  They use a WR.  They use their actual TE&#8217;s the way most teams use TE&#8217;s.  </p>
<p>He certainly is a hybrid position so maybe they can compromise but his primary role on their team is a big bodied pass catcher who lines up split wide or in the slot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: johosophat</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/02/16/forecasting-the-franchise-tags/#comment-1581379</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[johosophat]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2012 19:09:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=257555#comment-1581379</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m not sure what&#039;s up with all the Finley hate, I think he&#039;ll be a fan favorite after this season when he tears it up.  Then everyone&#039;ll say &quot;I was on the Finley train all along!&quot;. 

And if he leaves, I guess its don&#039;t know what you got till it&#039;s gone, and the wide open passing game from last year will have to close up without an option at TE and no mismatch to draw multiple defenders away from the other guys.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not sure what&#8217;s up with all the Finley hate, I think he&#8217;ll be a fan favorite after this season when he tears it up.  Then everyone&#8217;ll say &#8220;I was on the Finley train all along!&#8221;. </p>
<p>And if he leaves, I guess its don&#8217;t know what you got till it&#8217;s gone, and the wide open passing game from last year will have to close up without an option at TE and no mismatch to draw multiple defenders away from the other guys.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: magnusthe1st</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/02/16/forecasting-the-franchise-tags/#comment-1581353</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[magnusthe1st]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2012 18:58:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=257555#comment-1581353</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Two things:  
1) Finley is NOT a lock to receive the tag.  Maybe if he could live up to the hype and his talent potential, it could be plausible.  He could start by actually catching 2 balls in a row and not showboating when he catches 1 out of 10.

2) The Packers have more than shown that they can do just fine without him.  They&#039;re deep at receiver and have a couple of really promising guys at tight end.

Finley is a guy of great potential, no question.  But his attitude and lack of focus make him a good candidate to make for a high risk free agent to some team willing to pay him the money. I really wouldn&#039;t be shocked if they do make an offer, it&#039;ll be a mid-level contract and with some incentives.   

I say let him walk and win another Super Bowl without him.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Two things:<br />
1) Finley is NOT a lock to receive the tag.  Maybe if he could live up to the hype and his talent potential, it could be plausible.  He could start by actually catching 2 balls in a row and not showboating when he catches 1 out of 10.</p>
<p>2) The Packers have more than shown that they can do just fine without him.  They&#8217;re deep at receiver and have a couple of really promising guys at tight end.</p>
<p>Finley is a guy of great potential, no question.  But his attitude and lack of focus make him a good candidate to make for a high risk free agent to some team willing to pay him the money. I really wouldn&#8217;t be shocked if they do make an offer, it&#8217;ll be a mid-level contract and with some incentives.   </p>
<p>I say let him walk and win another Super Bowl without him.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fmlizard</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/02/16/forecasting-the-franchise-tags/#comment-1581311</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[fmlizard]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2012 18:40:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=257555#comment-1581311</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Carr might not be good enough to warrant a tag and Bowe reeks of &quot;pack it in once I get paid&quot;.

That said, the Chiefs better do some serious spending on retaining those guys or landing a few whales from other teams.  One source I have seen says they have over $60M(!!) in cap room counting the rollover from last season.

Going to have to start spending just to meet the salary floor.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Carr might not be good enough to warrant a tag and Bowe reeks of &#8220;pack it in once I get paid&#8221;.</p>
<p>That said, the Chiefs better do some serious spending on retaining those guys or landing a few whales from other teams.  One source I have seen says they have over $60M(!!) in cap room counting the rollover from last season.</p>
<p>Going to have to start spending just to meet the salary floor.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chocolatebaconbutter</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/02/16/forecasting-the-franchise-tags/#comment-1581301</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[chocolatebaconbutter]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2012 18:34:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=257555#comment-1581301</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Jermichael Finley is the most useless player in the NFL.  Dude can bench a refrigerator and jump over a van, but he can&#039;t catch a 10 yard dig route.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jermichael Finley is the most useless player in the NFL.  Dude can bench a refrigerator and jump over a van, but he can&#8217;t catch a 10 yard dig route.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: havok82</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/02/16/forecasting-the-franchise-tags/#comment-1581285</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[havok82]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2012 18:30:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=257555#comment-1581285</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Houston can&#039;t tag Williams and stay anywhere near the cap. They tag him and it&#039;s 23 million right there. If they tag anyone, it&#039;s Foster.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Houston can&#8217;t tag Williams and stay anywhere near the cap. They tag him and it&#8217;s 23 million right there. If they tag anyone, it&#8217;s Foster.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mikebrownistheworstownerinprosports</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/02/16/forecasting-the-franchise-tags/#comment-1581266</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[mikebrownistheworstownerinprosports]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2012 18:25:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=257555#comment-1581266</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@ jakek2

You do realize the Bengals made the playoffs last year...right?

They are projected by most to get there again in 2012. So maybe you should re-think your statement.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ jakek2</p>
<p>You do realize the Bengals made the playoffs last year&#8230;right?</p>
<p>They are projected by most to get there again in 2012. So maybe you should re-think your statement.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: marshawnlynchlookslikepredator</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/02/16/forecasting-the-franchise-tags/#comment-1581261</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[marshawnlynchlookslikepredator]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2012 18:23:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=257555#comment-1581261</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Why would the Broncos tag their kicker? I would think they could just sign him to a short term deal a lot cheaper than wasting their franchise tag on him. Jano&#039;s salary alone has to bring the tag above what they could get away with paying Prater]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why would the Broncos tag their kicker? I would think they could just sign him to a short term deal a lot cheaper than wasting their franchise tag on him. Jano&#8217;s salary alone has to bring the tag above what they could get away with paying Prater</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: glazerh8er</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/02/16/forecasting-the-franchise-tags/#comment-1581256</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[glazerh8er]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2012 18:22:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=257555#comment-1581256</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Glazers, buy all of them that don&#039;t get tagged. I don&#039;t care if that method doesn&#039;t work. It would be a HUGE upgrade over last year&#039;s method that didn&#039;t work.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Glazers, buy all of them that don&#8217;t get tagged. I don&#8217;t care if that method doesn&#8217;t work. It would be a HUGE upgrade over last year&#8217;s method that didn&#8217;t work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: noquickreactionshere</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/02/16/forecasting-the-franchise-tags/#comment-1581251</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[noquickreactionshere]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2012 18:21:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=257555#comment-1581251</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[benh999 says: 
Feb 16, 2012 11:46 AM 
@mac3333,
I don’t think there is a tag value for safeties. They are defensive backs along with cornerbacks. It is similar for DL and OL — RG and LT have the same cap number, ditto for DE/DT, etc.

______________________________

Your wrong about almost all three, safetys have their own tag number (6.5 mil) DE and DT have diff tag numbers (just over 12 Mil for DE and 7 mil for DT) and OL is the only area where they all have the same tag number... kind of dumb considering that the pay scale for each position is so differant.  Not only do tackles make more than guards but LT make more than RT.

Just my opinion...it hurts teams trying to franchize a center or guard but helps teams trying to franchize a LT.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>benh999 says:<br />
Feb 16, 2012 11:46 AM<br />
@mac3333,<br />
I don’t think there is a tag value for safeties. They are defensive backs along with cornerbacks. It is similar for DL and OL — RG and LT have the same cap number, ditto for DE/DT, etc.</p>
<p>______________________________</p>
<p>Your wrong about almost all three, safetys have their own tag number (6.5 mil) DE and DT have diff tag numbers (just over 12 Mil for DE and 7 mil for DT) and OL is the only area where they all have the same tag number&#8230; kind of dumb considering that the pay scale for each position is so differant.  Not only do tackles make more than guards but LT make more than RT.</p>
<p>Just my opinion&#8230;it hurts teams trying to franchize a center or guard but helps teams trying to franchize a LT.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gobs56</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/02/16/forecasting-the-franchise-tags/#comment-1581250</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[gobs56]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2012 18:21:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=257555#comment-1581250</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Giants have only used the franchise tag twice... So great guess that they wont use it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Giants have only used the franchise tag twice&#8230; So great guess that they wont use it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: willjasper</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/02/16/forecasting-the-franchise-tags/#comment-1581244</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[willjasper]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2012 18:18:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=257555#comment-1581244</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[No Mario Williams?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No Mario Williams?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: johosophat</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/02/16/forecasting-the-franchise-tags/#comment-1581243</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[johosophat]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2012 18:17:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=257555#comment-1581243</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Actually, they have a shot to get the arbitrator to side with them on WR money, thank McCarthy for that. This kid is an attitude and a problem, just because McCarthy likes him does not mean he needs to stay with the Packers (see Ryan Grant). He’s proven he’s a cancer and his bad attitude has already affected his potential. He’s shot. Good luck extorting that WR money from any other team, and good riddance Finley.

—————————————————————————-

If you are Finley&#039;s agent you have to try and make him the most money or you are doing a disservice to him.  In fact you&#039;d be moronic not to make the WR/TE argument, I think they&#039;ll find a middle ground.  I don&#039;t understand how he is a cancer... He really has matured and his &quot;bad attitude&quot; doesn&#039;t really ever show up.  
Yeah he wanted to be in the Super Bowl picture, deservedly so, he played up until the moron Donald Lee fumbled and got him hurt in 2010.
The Packers can&#039;t afford to fall behind teams like the Saints and Patriots and have nothing at TE again (remember the end of the 2010 season without him?) if the Packers don&#039;t bring him back the position looks bleak to say the least with two second year players and Quarless coming off an ACL tear.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, they have a shot to get the arbitrator to side with them on WR money, thank McCarthy for that. This kid is an attitude and a problem, just because McCarthy likes him does not mean he needs to stay with the Packers (see Ryan Grant). He’s proven he’s a cancer and his bad attitude has already affected his potential. He’s shot. Good luck extorting that WR money from any other team, and good riddance Finley.</p>
<p>—————————————————————————-</p>
<p>If you are Finley&#8217;s agent you have to try and make him the most money or you are doing a disservice to him.  In fact you&#8217;d be moronic not to make the WR/TE argument, I think they&#8217;ll find a middle ground.  I don&#8217;t understand how he is a cancer&#8230; He really has matured and his &#8220;bad attitude&#8221; doesn&#8217;t really ever show up.<br />
Yeah he wanted to be in the Super Bowl picture, deservedly so, he played up until the moron Donald Lee fumbled and got him hurt in 2010.<br />
The Packers can&#8217;t afford to fall behind teams like the Saints and Patriots and have nothing at TE again (remember the end of the 2010 season without him?) if the Packers don&#8217;t bring him back the position looks bleak to say the least with two second year players and Quarless coming off an ACL tear.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rickyrich14</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/02/16/forecasting-the-franchise-tags/#comment-1581239</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[rickyrich14]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2012 18:14:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=257555#comment-1581239</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How is Tyvon Branch not on any of these lists? Great reporting.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How is Tyvon Branch not on any of these lists? Great reporting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: goldrush36</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/02/16/forecasting-the-franchise-tags/#comment-1581238</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[goldrush36]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2012 18:14:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=257555#comment-1581238</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@uwsptke................. Vernon Davis has been in the league 2 years longer than Finley and just signed a huge extension. He is among the top 3 paid at the position if not top and technically Davis would be the first of the new wave. Also, Finley has a load of talent, but I don&#039;t believe he could unseat any of those guys you mention as a starter. He is much more like a more expensive Delanie Walker with a big mouth.... A matchup nightmare that is too inconsistent with the drops. Walker would likely start on 20 teams or more in the NFL if he weren&#039;t playing opposite Davis but he wouldn&#039;t be grouped among the elite and neither should Finley. @49erJohnny umm because they aren&#039;t paying him 15 mil even if for only a year. It&#039;s cheaper to give him a backloaded contract and cut him if he doesn&#039;t keep climbing. @ Bleedgreen.... I&#039;m pretty sure the new CBA prevents them from slapping a 3rd FT on VJax anyway, but regardless I think they are letting him walk. As to Carr and Bowe.... yes KC please tag Carr :D]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@uwsptke&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;.. Vernon Davis has been in the league 2 years longer than Finley and just signed a huge extension. He is among the top 3 paid at the position if not top and technically Davis would be the first of the new wave. Also, Finley has a load of talent, but I don&#8217;t believe he could unseat any of those guys you mention as a starter. He is much more like a more expensive Delanie Walker with a big mouth&#8230;. A matchup nightmare that is too inconsistent with the drops. Walker would likely start on 20 teams or more in the NFL if he weren&#8217;t playing opposite Davis but he wouldn&#8217;t be grouped among the elite and neither should Finley. @49erJohnny umm because they aren&#8217;t paying him 15 mil even if for only a year. It&#8217;s cheaper to give him a backloaded contract and cut him if he doesn&#8217;t keep climbing. @ Bleedgreen&#8230;. I&#8217;m pretty sure the new CBA prevents them from slapping a 3rd FT on VJax anyway, but regardless I think they are letting him walk. As to Carr and Bowe&#8230;. yes KC please tag Carr <img src='http://s0.wp.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Loose Changeup</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/02/16/forecasting-the-franchise-tags/#comment-1581234</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Loose Changeup]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2012 18:11:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=257555#comment-1581234</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Brees getting a franchise tag isn&#039;t a no brainer.  Good chance that the Saints use a tag, but it&#039;ll probably be Nicks.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brees getting a franchise tag isn&#8217;t a no brainer.  Good chance that the Saints use a tag, but it&#8217;ll probably be Nicks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hawkforlife</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/02/16/forecasting-the-franchise-tags/#comment-1581224</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[hawkforlife]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2012 18:06:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=257555#comment-1581224</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@ uschawk

As much as I&#039;d like to see &quot;The Beast&quot; back I&#039;d franchise Red Bryant. You can find running backs but a man that big that can play DE and at that level, not out there. Can&#039;t lose him.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ uschawk</p>
<p>As much as I&#8217;d like to see &#8220;The Beast&#8221; back I&#8217;d franchise Red Bryant. You can find running backs but a man that big that can play DE and at that level, not out there. Can&#8217;t lose him.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gravedigger93</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/02/16/forecasting-the-franchise-tags/#comment-1581217</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[gravedigger93]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2012 17:58:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=257555#comment-1581217</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Finley isn&#039;t going to be getting the tag for Green Bay, Scott Wells is. He&#039;s a core player for GB and there hasn&#039;t been any progress towards a new deal. Finley is a luxury, not a necessity, and he&#039;s not a blue chip player. They use the same tact they used last offseason with James Jones. They will let him test the FA waters but ultimately the Packers will be the only team to give him a good deal. It&#039;s going to be a humbling experience for him as I imagine it was for James Jones.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Finley isn&#8217;t going to be getting the tag for Green Bay, Scott Wells is. He&#8217;s a core player for GB and there hasn&#8217;t been any progress towards a new deal. Finley is a luxury, not a necessity, and he&#8217;s not a blue chip player. They use the same tact they used last offseason with James Jones. They will let him test the FA waters but ultimately the Packers will be the only team to give him a good deal. It&#8217;s going to be a humbling experience for him as I imagine it was for James Jones.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gator2006</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/02/16/forecasting-the-franchise-tags/#comment-1581216</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[gator2006]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2012 17:58:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=257555#comment-1581216</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Why doesn&#039;t anybody talk about using a transition tag instead?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why doesn&#8217;t anybody talk about using a transition tag instead?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EJ</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/02/16/forecasting-the-franchise-tags/#comment-1581210</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[EJ]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2012 17:54:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=257555#comment-1581210</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Bills will get a long term contract set with Stevie Johnson before March 5th. He is too important to the teams future growth.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Bills will get a long term contract set with Stevie Johnson before March 5th. He is too important to the teams future growth.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chadgoy</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/02/16/forecasting-the-franchise-tags/#comment-1581208</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[chadgoy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2012 17:52:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=257555#comment-1581208</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;d say an almost sure thing is the Raiders tagging Tyvon Branch. He was the only solid player in the secondary, and will be a priority.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d say an almost sure thing is the Raiders tagging Tyvon Branch. He was the only solid player in the secondary, and will be a priority.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
