<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Stanford Routt chooses the Chiefs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/02/20/stanford-routt-chooses-the-chiefs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/02/20/stanford-routt-chooses-the-chiefs/</link>
	<description>ProFootballTalk on NBCSports.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2013 03:05:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: 808raiderinparadise</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/02/20/stanford-routt-chooses-the-chiefs/#comment-1587398</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[808raiderinparadise]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2012 19:49:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=281554#comment-1587398</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Denarius Moore made his way into the starting line-up from roasting Routt alllllllllllll camp ... watch for that to happen twice every year.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Denarius Moore made his way into the starting line-up from roasting Routt alllllllllllll camp &#8230; watch for that to happen twice every year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: andymc58</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/02/20/stanford-routt-chooses-the-chiefs/#comment-1587062</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[andymc58]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2012 16:36:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=281554#comment-1587062</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Maybe the Chiefs signed him because they figure oakland will give them two first rounders for him.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe the Chiefs signed him because they figure oakland will give them two first rounders for him.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: raiders757</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/02/20/stanford-routt-chooses-the-chiefs/#comment-1586876</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[raiders757]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2012 15:09:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=281554#comment-1586876</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[bcjim says: Feb 20, 2012 1:46 PM

I dont know if it is an EC/WC thing or I am really just out of touch with the nfl anymore but I have no idea who Stanford Routt is.

-------------------------------------

It&#039;s the ESPN effect. A lot of sports fans don&#039;t know a thing about any team outside the North East thanks to that tabloid network.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>bcjim says: Feb 20, 2012 1:46 PM</p>
<p>I dont know if it is an EC/WC thing or I am really just out of touch with the nfl anymore but I have no idea who Stanford Routt is.</p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-</p>
<p>It&#8217;s the ESPN effect. A lot of sports fans don&#8217;t know a thing about any team outside the North East thanks to that tabloid network.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: spinmovr</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/02/20/stanford-routt-chooses-the-chiefs/#comment-1586678</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[spinmovr]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2012 06:59:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=281554#comment-1586678</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[radrntn, excellent point on D Allen being a defensive coach with plenty of experience managing secondaries. Yeah if anybody knows Routt isn&#039;t going to work, it&#039;s the new head coach. The Saints secondary he ran in &#039;09 wasn&#039;t bursting with talent yet he was able to coach them up well enough that they made the SB-clinching INT against this generations best QB. If Routt can&#039;t play for a coach like that, the dude can&#039;t play.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>radrntn, excellent point on D Allen being a defensive coach with plenty of experience managing secondaries. Yeah if anybody knows Routt isn&#8217;t going to work, it&#8217;s the new head coach. The Saints secondary he ran in &#8217;09 wasn&#8217;t bursting with talent yet he was able to coach them up well enough that they made the SB-clinching INT against this generations best QB. If Routt can&#8217;t play for a coach like that, the dude can&#8217;t play.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: darealjnickel</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/02/20/stanford-routt-chooses-the-chiefs/#comment-1586648</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[darealjnickel]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2012 05:13:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=281554#comment-1586648</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dear Stanford routt u will not be missed p.s you need to go 2 jail for robbing Mr.Davis and the Oakland raiders for the last 5 years]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Stanford routt u will not be missed p.s you need to go 2 jail for robbing Mr.Davis and the Oakland raiders for the last 5 years</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: radrntn</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/02/20/stanford-routt-chooses-the-chiefs/#comment-1586507</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[radrntn]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2012 02:12:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=281554#comment-1586507</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In all reality, what we lost was the second man up on our 4 x 100 relay team.

It seems reggie does not care about having the fasest relay team, he cares more about players that can play, rather than players that can run fast. 

Also for the comments about the hue jackson, and Raiders not knowing how to use Stanford....keep in mind this is the first move by a new head coach, who was a d-coord, who specialized in the secondary, and his first move was to cut Stanford.  I guess he felt if Tebow could pick Routt apart, andybody could. He can&#039;t hurt KC anymore then he hurt us...Not so much pass interference, as it was more illegal contact on 3rd and mile plays over and over again that kept giving the opponent first downs.. C-ya]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In all reality, what we lost was the second man up on our 4 x 100 relay team.</p>
<p>It seems reggie does not care about having the fasest relay team, he cares more about players that can play, rather than players that can run fast. </p>
<p>Also for the comments about the hue jackson, and Raiders not knowing how to use Stanford&#8230;.keep in mind this is the first move by a new head coach, who was a d-coord, who specialized in the secondary, and his first move was to cut Stanford.  I guess he felt if Tebow could pick Routt apart, andybody could. He can&#8217;t hurt KC anymore then he hurt us&#8230;Not so much pass interference, as it was more illegal contact on 3rd and mile plays over and over again that kept giving the opponent first downs.. C-ya</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jbaxt</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/02/20/stanford-routt-chooses-the-chiefs/#comment-1586504</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jbaxt]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2012 02:10:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=281554#comment-1586504</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;I love it when a moron speaks&quot; hence your love for being a faider fan?

Raiders suck, worst franchise and it&#039;s not even close.  You trolls were horrible to start with, it was just the rest of the division was down yet you still choked.  For whatever reason the Bronco&#039;s wouldn&#039;t play for Orton, SD couldn&#039;t get it together, and KC was in meltdown mode with Pioli/Haley.  Yet all were within a game of losing to the Steelers.    

Your idiot HC trades for a #2 QB, Mcdon&#039;tlikethepadson wusses out every year.  What was it?  His toe or foot?  Or was is dress the wrong color?  

If KC doesn&#039;t lose Charles, Moeaki, and Berry the go 10-6 and kill the division.  But I&#039;m over it, it&#039;s okay, I got past this season the second it was over.  But us KC fans are okay because KC has a future unlike Choakland.  

No draft...  This is beyond hillarious,!  Not only do you typically not get much out of the top 5 rounds most teams get every year, but it takes 2-3 years for those rookies to actually develop.  Welcome to the newest Ricky Williams Saints trade.  Cellar Dwellers for a good 3-5 years.  And by that time, likely after next year, Palmers gone.   And for a 1st and 2nd rounder.  You&#039;re going to miss the playoffs with him on your team and you gave up so much for that.  Total bonehead move by the franchise formally known as crap.   

Each team in the west, except for you loser faiders, will be better.  Depending on Tebow they will likely stay the same.  SD or KC is the division lock next year and with KC playing the last place schedule vs. the 1st place schedule this past year, (something choke fans know nothing about) KC will likely be the winner.  

You guys make it too easy...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I love it when a moron speaks&#8221; hence your love for being a faider fan?</p>
<p>Raiders suck, worst franchise and it&#8217;s not even close.  You trolls were horrible to start with, it was just the rest of the division was down yet you still choked.  For whatever reason the Bronco&#8217;s wouldn&#8217;t play for Orton, SD couldn&#8217;t get it together, and KC was in meltdown mode with Pioli/Haley.  Yet all were within a game of losing to the Steelers.    </p>
<p>Your idiot HC trades for a #2 QB, Mcdon&#8217;tlikethepadson wusses out every year.  What was it?  His toe or foot?  Or was is dress the wrong color?  </p>
<p>If KC doesn&#8217;t lose Charles, Moeaki, and Berry the go 10-6 and kill the division.  But I&#8217;m over it, it&#8217;s okay, I got past this season the second it was over.  But us KC fans are okay because KC has a future unlike Choakland.  </p>
<p>No draft&#8230;  This is beyond hillarious,!  Not only do you typically not get much out of the top 5 rounds most teams get every year, but it takes 2-3 years for those rookies to actually develop.  Welcome to the newest Ricky Williams Saints trade.  Cellar Dwellers for a good 3-5 years.  And by that time, likely after next year, Palmers gone.   And for a 1st and 2nd rounder.  You&#8217;re going to miss the playoffs with him on your team and you gave up so much for that.  Total bonehead move by the franchise formally known as crap.   </p>
<p>Each team in the west, except for you loser faiders, will be better.  Depending on Tebow they will likely stay the same.  SD or KC is the division lock next year and with KC playing the last place schedule vs. the 1st place schedule this past year, (something choke fans know nothing about) KC will likely be the winner.  </p>
<p>You guys make it too easy&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dewalt2990</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/02/20/stanford-routt-chooses-the-chiefs/#comment-1586328</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[dewalt2990]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2012 23:59:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=281554#comment-1586328</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How is this not tampering???? Cliff Avril&#039;s not allowed to talk to an agent or team.  Yet this guy&#039;s got a deal worked out BEFORE free agency opens???]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How is this not tampering???? Cliff Avril&#8217;s not allowed to talk to an agent or team.  Yet this guy&#8217;s got a deal worked out BEFORE free agency opens???</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chadinkc30</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/02/20/stanford-routt-chooses-the-chiefs/#comment-1586278</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[chadinkc30]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2012 23:31:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=281554#comment-1586278</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ugh the Raiders always play man to man and have for the entirety of their franchise, the Chiefs play more zone, so dont know what the heck you know about football, obviously nothing!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ugh the Raiders always play man to man and have for the entirety of their franchise, the Chiefs play more zone, so dont know what the heck you know about football, obviously nothing!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: detroitrollin22</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/02/20/stanford-routt-chooses-the-chiefs/#comment-1586099</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[detroitrollin22]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2012 21:49:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=281554#comment-1586099</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Brandon Carr should return home to the Detroit Lions]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brandon Carr should return home to the Detroit Lions</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: conjecture101</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/02/20/stanford-routt-chooses-the-chiefs/#comment-1586085</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[conjecture101]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2012 21:41:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=281554#comment-1586085</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[These Packersaints fans are relentless. It&#039;s not Stanford&#039;s fault Hue Jackson decided to go mostly zone after week 5 or so. On top of that he had Matt Giordono as his safety help. You do the math.

All this Pass interference commentary is laughable. Its not Routt&#039;s fault that Roger Goodell destroyed the game so that you cant touch the receiver. Nnamdi struggled this year, even Revis did because it is so ridiculously unfair to the defensive backs in this league.

Routt will excel where they play man to man and not some multiple zone crap.

And another thing; McKenzie and Dennis Allen are on an ego trip with no GPS.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These Packersaints fans are relentless. It&#8217;s not Stanford&#8217;s fault Hue Jackson decided to go mostly zone after week 5 or so. On top of that he had Matt Giordono as his safety help. You do the math.</p>
<p>All this Pass interference commentary is laughable. Its not Routt&#8217;s fault that Roger Goodell destroyed the game so that you cant touch the receiver. Nnamdi struggled this year, even Revis did because it is so ridiculously unfair to the defensive backs in this league.</p>
<p>Routt will excel where they play man to man and not some multiple zone crap.</p>
<p>And another thing; McKenzie and Dennis Allen are on an ego trip with no GPS.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: greatminnesotasportsmind</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/02/20/stanford-routt-chooses-the-chiefs/#comment-1586062</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[greatminnesotasportsmind]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2012 21:29:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=281554#comment-1586062</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[PASS INTERFERENCE……NUMBER 26,,THE BALL WILL BE PLACED AT THE SPOT OF THE INFRACTION.THE PLAY RESULTS IN A FIRST DOWN…Oh yeah get used to heading that ALOT Chief fan.


Unless your Ed Hochuli

&quot;Pass Interference on the defense number 26, the ball will be spotted at the spot of the infraction.  Therefore the ball will be placed at the 24 yard line.  Since it is pass interference, it is an automatic first down. Since is it first down, the offense will have the ball 1st and 10 at the 24 yard line.  Please place 40 seconds on the play clock.  The offense will have 40 seconds to snap the ball, or the offensive team will be charged with a penalty of a 5 yard infraction, unless they chose to use a timeout.  If they do chose to call a timeout, they will be without a timeout for the remainder of the half.  Since they wouldn&#039;t have a timeout out, they would not be able to challenge a play.  Unless the umpire upstairs chooses to challenge the play.  All scoring plays are no automatically reviewed.  Therefore they wouldn&#039;t be allowed to challenge a non scoring play.&quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PASS INTERFERENCE……NUMBER 26,,THE BALL WILL BE PLACED AT THE SPOT OF THE INFRACTION.THE PLAY RESULTS IN A FIRST DOWN…Oh yeah get used to heading that ALOT Chief fan.</p>
<p>Unless your Ed Hochuli</p>
<p>&#8220;Pass Interference on the defense number 26, the ball will be spotted at the spot of the infraction.  Therefore the ball will be placed at the 24 yard line.  Since it is pass interference, it is an automatic first down. Since is it first down, the offense will have the ball 1st and 10 at the 24 yard line.  Please place 40 seconds on the play clock.  The offense will have 40 seconds to snap the ball, or the offensive team will be charged with a penalty of a 5 yard infraction, unless they chose to use a timeout.  If they do chose to call a timeout, they will be without a timeout for the remainder of the half.  Since they wouldn&#8217;t have a timeout out, they would not be able to challenge a play.  Unless the umpire upstairs chooses to challenge the play.  All scoring plays are no automatically reviewed.  Therefore they wouldn&#8217;t be allowed to challenge a non scoring play.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: deathspiralx</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/02/20/stanford-routt-chooses-the-chiefs/#comment-1586059</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[deathspiralx]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2012 21:28:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=281554#comment-1586059</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The chiefs can have him...  

He&#039;ll have to step up his game significantly for his signing to bring value to the chiefs. He was an undisciplined, Al Davis track scholarship player for the Raiders.

The change of scenery and coaching may do the trick, but I doubt it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The chiefs can have him&#8230;  </p>
<p>He&#8217;ll have to step up his game significantly for his signing to bring value to the chiefs. He was an undisciplined, Al Davis track scholarship player for the Raiders.</p>
<p>The change of scenery and coaching may do the trick, but I doubt it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: racerx1225</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/02/20/stanford-routt-chooses-the-chiefs/#comment-1586025</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[racerx1225]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2012 21:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=281554#comment-1586025</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[gjp2030 says: Feb 20, 2012 1:54 PM

I love how all Raider fans talk like games against KC are “two automatic wins”. You guys talk every year like you’re going to steamroll the division and win 6-8 games every year. Make the playoffs first and not be wrecks, then trash talk. You won just one more game than we did and we had our best players out with injuries. You’ll be lucky to even have a close game with KC this year.
______________________________

I love it when a moron speaks, I like to laugh.  You beat us because we had Kyle Boller in and speaking of injuries to our starting QB, they were combined with our #1 and #2 WR&#039;s, our #1 RB, our #2 CB, #2 DE, etc.  You guys blow and have never been worth a dam.  Try looking up historical stats on records and playoff appearances and Super Bowl berths and then try running your mouth Einstein.  Sheesh!  What a jerk :D]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>gjp2030 says: Feb 20, 2012 1:54 PM</p>
<p>I love how all Raider fans talk like games against KC are “two automatic wins”. You guys talk every year like you’re going to steamroll the division and win 6-8 games every year. Make the playoffs first and not be wrecks, then trash talk. You won just one more game than we did and we had our best players out with injuries. You’ll be lucky to even have a close game with KC this year.<br />
______________________________</p>
<p>I love it when a moron speaks, I like to laugh.  You beat us because we had Kyle Boller in and speaking of injuries to our starting QB, they were combined with our #1 and #2 WR&#8217;s, our #1 RB, our #2 CB, #2 DE, etc.  You guys blow and have never been worth a dam.  Try looking up historical stats on records and playoff appearances and Super Bowl berths and then try running your mouth Einstein.  Sheesh!  What a jerk <img src='http://s0.wp.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: spinmovr</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/02/20/stanford-routt-chooses-the-chiefs/#comment-1585999</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[spinmovr]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2012 20:57:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=281554#comment-1585999</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Chef fans need to hold up on all the celebrating. Stanford Routt is not a very good CB. Any Raider fan who&#039;s actually paid attention the last 5 or so years will tell you that. Our pass defense has been held together with duct tape and spit, even when Asomugha was there. We&#039;ve been doing it with  smoke and mirrors and doing it ineffectively, as our team defense stats will show. I&#039;m not saying Routt was to blame for all of our pass defense troubles but he certainly wasn&#039;t the bright spot, the one holding it together or trying to lead the way. He&#039;s fast and he doesn&#039;t know how to cover WRs in the NFL.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chef fans need to hold up on all the celebrating. Stanford Routt is not a very good CB. Any Raider fan who&#8217;s actually paid attention the last 5 or so years will tell you that. Our pass defense has been held together with duct tape and spit, even when Asomugha was there. We&#8217;ve been doing it with  smoke and mirrors and doing it ineffectively, as our team defense stats will show. I&#8217;m not saying Routt was to blame for all of our pass defense troubles but he certainly wasn&#8217;t the bright spot, the one holding it together or trying to lead the way. He&#8217;s fast and he doesn&#8217;t know how to cover WRs in the NFL.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jbaxt</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/02/20/stanford-routt-chooses-the-chiefs/#comment-1585992</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jbaxt]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2012 20:49:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=281554#comment-1585992</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Love the DA faider fans commenting.  Coming off a &quot;record&quot; season for penalties, the worst trade in 15 years, and blowing their chance at the playoffs.  Of course if I was a fan of a team that didn&#039;t have a draft I&#039;d try to get a comment in while I could.

Routt comes from the record holding penalized team, of course he has some PI calls.  So really what you trolls are saying is any guy on your team is a DA because based on the record books...  It was a Pue jackson group effort to suck away a season where the West was so far down.  

Enjoy the cellar because SD, Denver, and KC are only getting better, you know, because they all have a draft.  I knew that Al Passing away couldn&#039;t be real, he&#039;s clearly still running the doomed ship.  

Be sure and try to justify Palmer starting over Campbell next year.  I&#039;d be mad if my team traded a 1st and a 2nd for a #2 QB too.  Suckers!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Love the DA faider fans commenting.  Coming off a &#8220;record&#8221; season for penalties, the worst trade in 15 years, and blowing their chance at the playoffs.  Of course if I was a fan of a team that didn&#8217;t have a draft I&#8217;d try to get a comment in while I could.</p>
<p>Routt comes from the record holding penalized team, of course he has some PI calls.  So really what you trolls are saying is any guy on your team is a DA because based on the record books&#8230;  It was a Pue jackson group effort to suck away a season where the West was so far down.  </p>
<p>Enjoy the cellar because SD, Denver, and KC are only getting better, you know, because they all have a draft.  I knew that Al Passing away couldn&#8217;t be real, he&#8217;s clearly still running the doomed ship.  </p>
<p>Be sure and try to justify Palmer starting over Campbell next year.  I&#8217;d be mad if my team traded a 1st and a 2nd for a #2 QB too.  Suckers!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stevincinci</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/02/20/stanford-routt-chooses-the-chiefs/#comment-1585978</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[stevincinci]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2012 20:39:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=281554#comment-1585978</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[raidermot says: Feb 20, 2012 1:34 PM

The first game against The Chiefs, I predict The Raiders go after Routt like a Bronco on a DeAngelo.

Yeah, that way Carson can get an early start on his 20 plus int season. Oh  yeah, thanks Raiders for that #1 pick you gave Cincy for your interception prone qb.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>raidermot says: Feb 20, 2012 1:34 PM</p>
<p>The first game against The Chiefs, I predict The Raiders go after Routt like a Bronco on a DeAngelo.</p>
<p>Yeah, that way Carson can get an early start on his 20 plus int season. Oh  yeah, thanks Raiders for that #1 pick you gave Cincy for your interception prone qb.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chadinkc30</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/02/20/stanford-routt-chooses-the-chiefs/#comment-1585961</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[chadinkc30]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2012 20:32:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=281554#comment-1585961</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You know that guy who won MVP and took team to super bowl]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You know that guy who won MVP and took team to super bowl</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chadinkc30</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/02/20/stanford-routt-chooses-the-chiefs/#comment-1585957</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[chadinkc30]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2012 20:31:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=281554#comment-1585957</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wasn&#039;t Rich Gannon a chief? Morons]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wasn&#8217;t Rich Gannon a chief? Morons</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: villa41</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/02/20/stanford-routt-chooses-the-chiefs/#comment-1585953</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[villa41]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2012 20:28:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=281554#comment-1585953</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[only time will tell waht the Chiefs really have in mind for Routt.  I can say this, though.  If Crennel and the Chiefs think this guy is anything more than a situational nickelback, then they don&#039;t know as much defense as they think and they&#039;re out of their minds.  Speaking of being out of one&#039;s mind, that&#039;s the biggest problem with Routt.  Forgot the fact he&#039;s a marginal player who commits a lot of penalties to compensate for the fact he really isn&#039;t that good.  Routt&#039;s a me first type of guy more interested in his own stats (or lack thereof) than a team player.  Just watch the post game show after the San Diego game where he said the Raiders had a good defense.  In what world did the Raiders (and this is coming from a life long Raider fan) have a good denfese this past season?  I&#039;m going to enjoy watching this joker get worked twice a year by the Oakland offense.  Good riddance.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>only time will tell waht the Chiefs really have in mind for Routt.  I can say this, though.  If Crennel and the Chiefs think this guy is anything more than a situational nickelback, then they don&#8217;t know as much defense as they think and they&#8217;re out of their minds.  Speaking of being out of one&#8217;s mind, that&#8217;s the biggest problem with Routt.  Forgot the fact he&#8217;s a marginal player who commits a lot of penalties to compensate for the fact he really isn&#8217;t that good.  Routt&#8217;s a me first type of guy more interested in his own stats (or lack thereof) than a team player.  Just watch the post game show after the San Diego game where he said the Raiders had a good defense.  In what world did the Raiders (and this is coming from a life long Raider fan) have a good denfese this past season?  I&#8217;m going to enjoy watching this joker get worked twice a year by the Oakland offense.  Good riddance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: commitment2excrement</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/02/20/stanford-routt-chooses-the-chiefs/#comment-1585937</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[commitment2excrement]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2012 20:12:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=281554#comment-1585937</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Lol all the Raider fans who announced Routt was the second coming of Asmouga are now clamoring and laughing at the Chiefs for picking up Routt for WHAT HE IS WORTH.  News flash. Romeo Crennel knows his defense. Unlike Bresnahan, Crennel isn&#039;t going to leave Routt on an island. And Routt will have help over the top unlike another overpaid under performing secondary man in Huff. 

Chiefs got a slight downgrade in Routt over Carr

Oakland got a practice squad wife beater over Routt

Chiefs win this one.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lol all the Raider fans who announced Routt was the second coming of Asmouga are now clamoring and laughing at the Chiefs for picking up Routt for WHAT HE IS WORTH.  News flash. Romeo Crennel knows his defense. Unlike Bresnahan, Crennel isn&#8217;t going to leave Routt on an island. And Routt will have help over the top unlike another overpaid under performing secondary man in Huff. </p>
<p>Chiefs got a slight downgrade in Routt over Carr</p>
<p>Oakland got a practice squad wife beater over Routt</p>
<p>Chiefs win this one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: spellingcops</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/02/20/stanford-routt-chooses-the-chiefs/#comment-1585932</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[spellingcops]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2012 20:05:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=281554#comment-1585932</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Has to be the best day of his life.  $20M, and better yet, he gets out of that dump chokeland.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Has to be the best day of his life.  $20M, and better yet, he gets out of that dump chokeland.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tdk24</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/02/20/stanford-routt-chooses-the-chiefs/#comment-1585922</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[tdk24]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2012 19:51:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=281554#comment-1585922</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;yelix says:
Feb 20, 2012 1:56 PM
I agree that he’s overrated, but he always seemed to get game-breaking interceptions against the Chiefs. Hopefully he can do the same to his old team, because intercepting Carson Palmer isn’t exactly rocket science.

I love when former Raiders come to KC and play better than they did in Oakland. Al Davis thought Marcus Allen was done, but he came back and had 5 really good years in KC, and burned the Raiders regularly.&quot;

Allen is really the only one that played better.  And you can say that about both teams.  Harvey Williams, Albert Lewis.  Both of them played well, all Allen did was punch it in from one yard.  By far his best years were with the Raiders.  And that ring he has, yep, it says Raiders, not chiefs.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;yelix says:<br />
Feb 20, 2012 1:56 PM<br />
I agree that he’s overrated, but he always seemed to get game-breaking interceptions against the Chiefs. Hopefully he can do the same to his old team, because intercepting Carson Palmer isn’t exactly rocket science.</p>
<p>I love when former Raiders come to KC and play better than they did in Oakland. Al Davis thought Marcus Allen was done, but he came back and had 5 really good years in KC, and burned the Raiders regularly.&#8221;</p>
<p>Allen is really the only one that played better.  And you can say that about both teams.  Harvey Williams, Albert Lewis.  Both of them played well, all Allen did was punch it in from one yard.  By far his best years were with the Raiders.  And that ring he has, yep, it says Raiders, not chiefs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kcbaby58</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/02/20/stanford-routt-chooses-the-chiefs/#comment-1585913</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[kcbaby58]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2012 19:48:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=281554#comment-1585913</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Alright routt it is. Combined with flowers and our two young safety&#039;s our db sitch has not takin a hit! Will be nice if we sign bowe franchise Carr and weigh options on trade value.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alright routt it is. Combined with flowers and our two young safety&#8217;s our db sitch has not takin a hit! Will be nice if we sign bowe franchise Carr and weigh options on trade value.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: schilhater</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/02/20/stanford-routt-chooses-the-chiefs/#comment-1585910</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[schilhater]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2012 19:46:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=281554#comment-1585910</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I love how all Raider fans talk like games against KC are “two automatic wins”. You guys talk every year like you’re going to steamroll the division and win 6-8 games every year. Make the playoffs first and not be wrecks, then trash talk. You won just one more game than we did and we had our best players out with injuries. You’ll be lucky to even have a close game with KC this year.

-------------------------------------------------

REALLY?? Cause the Raiders have sucked for the las 10 out of 12 years so I don&#039;t remember anybody saying we were going to &quot;steamroll&quot; our division. And you even proved how stupid you are because our injuries were just as bad, get a clue you loser]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love how all Raider fans talk like games against KC are “two automatic wins”. You guys talk every year like you’re going to steamroll the division and win 6-8 games every year. Make the playoffs first and not be wrecks, then trash talk. You won just one more game than we did and we had our best players out with injuries. You’ll be lucky to even have a close game with KC this year.</p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-</p>
<p>REALLY?? Cause the Raiders have sucked for the las 10 out of 12 years so I don&#8217;t remember anybody saying we were going to &#8220;steamroll&#8221; our division. And you even proved how stupid you are because our injuries were just as bad, get a clue you loser</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ottomanismydog</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/02/20/stanford-routt-chooses-the-chiefs/#comment-1585906</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ottomanismydog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2012 19:44:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=281554#comment-1585906</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[that&#039;s a beast mode secondary in KC]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>that&#8217;s a beast mode secondary in KC</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: frostbelt</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/02/20/stanford-routt-chooses-the-chiefs/#comment-1585900</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[frostbelt]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2012 19:41:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=281554#comment-1585900</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Chiefs are gonna suck next year...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chiefs are gonna suck next year&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: klutch14u</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/02/20/stanford-routt-chooses-the-chiefs/#comment-1585896</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[klutch14u]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2012 19:39:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=281554#comment-1585896</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Decent signing at a reasonable price.  I hope you guys scoop up Carr for the 13 million per year he is demanding.  He isn&#039;t half the corner that Flowers is, it&#039;s ridiculous.  We also have some young corners that look promising PLUS we actually have draft picks.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Decent signing at a reasonable price.  I hope you guys scoop up Carr for the 13 million per year he is demanding.  He isn&#8217;t half the corner that Flowers is, it&#8217;s ridiculous.  We also have some young corners that look promising PLUS we actually have draft picks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mobuccsfan</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/02/20/stanford-routt-chooses-the-chiefs/#comment-1585894</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[mobuccsfan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2012 19:38:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=281554#comment-1585894</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Maybe Carr could come on down to Tampa he would be much better than Biggers, Mack, Lewis and Talib, as well as Barber, Barber is too old and I wouldn&#039;t be surprised to see him retire this year, finally. Speaking of Talib, where is the mention of his trial? Isn&#039;t supposed to take place in March? I think that would be interesting to see what is going on with that. Even if he does get off, I think the Buccs should cut him. I would take a chance on Carr and possibly even Finnegan, if the team is committed to spending a little cheddar and Schiano can get Finnegan and the entire team to be disciplined. I think that is his biggest challenge, that and forcing the Glaziers to spend money! Pipe Dream-Draft Richardson, trade for Osi, get Carr and Finnegan, get Mike Wallace or Vincent Jackson, somehow, one way or another and draft more O-and D-Line depth and secondary depth. 
Not sure the best LBs out there in FA, so hopefully land a star in the bottom rounds of draft or pickup a solid role player, who would surely be better than the garbage that was on the field last year. 

That is this Buccsfan&#039;s Pipe Dream! Hey, one can dream, right? I think if all of those or most of those moves were to happen, Tampa could get to 8-8 next year and battle for the South for 3-5 years, as well as the NFC. Keywords are if and could, because really it will depend on what kind of schemes the new offense and defense roll out and if the team can finally become disciplined and the Glaziers start spending. Wish they would just sell Manchester U or sell the Buccaneers to someone who wants to win!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe Carr could come on down to Tampa he would be much better than Biggers, Mack, Lewis and Talib, as well as Barber, Barber is too old and I wouldn&#8217;t be surprised to see him retire this year, finally. Speaking of Talib, where is the mention of his trial? Isn&#8217;t supposed to take place in March? I think that would be interesting to see what is going on with that. Even if he does get off, I think the Buccs should cut him. I would take a chance on Carr and possibly even Finnegan, if the team is committed to spending a little cheddar and Schiano can get Finnegan and the entire team to be disciplined. I think that is his biggest challenge, that and forcing the Glaziers to spend money! Pipe Dream-Draft Richardson, trade for Osi, get Carr and Finnegan, get Mike Wallace or Vincent Jackson, somehow, one way or another and draft more O-and D-Line depth and secondary depth.<br />
Not sure the best LBs out there in FA, so hopefully land a star in the bottom rounds of draft or pickup a solid role player, who would surely be better than the garbage that was on the field last year. </p>
<p>That is this Buccsfan&#8217;s Pipe Dream! Hey, one can dream, right? I think if all of those or most of those moves were to happen, Tampa could get to 8-8 next year and battle for the South for 3-5 years, as well as the NFC. Keywords are if and could, because really it will depend on what kind of schemes the new offense and defense roll out and if the team can finally become disciplined and the Glaziers start spending. Wish they would just sell Manchester U or sell the Buccaneers to someone who wants to win!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: raiderstotheship</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/02/20/stanford-routt-chooses-the-chiefs/#comment-1585890</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[raiderstotheship]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2012 19:37:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=281554#comment-1585890</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As a raider fan im more then thrilled to see him go to kc. Im not guaranteeing 2 wins, but he is a below average starter, there is a reason CHRIS JOHNSON beat him out for a starting job in routts 4th year! But he&#039;s a penalty magnet, overpaid, and now carson knows who to pick on all game, especially with dhb, jacoby, and denarius running by him. Grab away!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a raider fan im more then thrilled to see him go to kc. Im not guaranteeing 2 wins, but he is a below average starter, there is a reason CHRIS JOHNSON beat him out for a starting job in routts 4th year! But he&#8217;s a penalty magnet, overpaid, and now carson knows who to pick on all game, especially with dhb, jacoby, and denarius running by him. Grab away!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
