<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Packers, Finley work out two-year contract</title>
	<atom:link href="http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/02/22/packers-finley-work-out-two-year-contract/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/02/22/packers-finley-work-out-two-year-contract/</link>
	<description>ProFootballTalk on NBCSports.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 01:01:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: axespray</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/02/22/packers-finley-work-out-two-year-contract/#comment-1590667</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[axespray]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2012 23:47:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=294016#comment-1590667</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[love the 2009 version of Finley, the cris carter camp attending never drop a pass Finley.... That Finley &gt; 2011 allergic to 3rd down plays finley.

Let&#039;s trade James Jones to the rams/browns, let driver retire a packer, make cobb the no.3, promote Tori up to the main roster, keep this train moving.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>love the 2009 version of Finley, the cris carter camp attending never drop a pass Finley&#8230;. That Finley &gt; 2011 allergic to 3rd down plays finley.</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s trade James Jones to the rams/browns, let driver retire a packer, make cobb the no.3, promote Tori up to the main roster, keep this train moving.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shadowgm1</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/02/22/packers-finley-work-out-two-year-contract/#comment-1590638</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[shadowgm1]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2012 23:25:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=294016#comment-1590638</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Actually, I&#039;m with purplecrowe on the Rudolph sentiment.  He is going to be a pain in the Green and Gold&#039;s side for as long as they don&#039;t screw up his contract.  I could see Allen&#039;s pompous windbag waxing philosophic on Finley to Minny in 2010, maybe 2011 up until Rudolph played.  Also as a fellow Packer fan, I&#039;m amused at the disregard for Ponder&#039;s talent within our fanbase.  Second best QB in the draft last season to Locker.  Count on it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, I&#8217;m with purplecrowe on the Rudolph sentiment.  He is going to be a pain in the Green and Gold&#8217;s side for as long as they don&#8217;t screw up his contract.  I could see Allen&#8217;s pompous windbag waxing philosophic on Finley to Minny in 2010, maybe 2011 up until Rudolph played.  Also as a fellow Packer fan, I&#8217;m amused at the disregard for Ponder&#8217;s talent within our fanbase.  Second best QB in the draft last season to Locker.  Count on it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: claymath52</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/02/22/packers-finley-work-out-two-year-contract/#comment-1590521</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[claymath52]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2012 22:24:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=294016#comment-1590521</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[purplecrowe says: 
Feb 23, 2012 6:58 AM 
@claymath52

I haven’t listened to PA in a while, but all that talk kind of surprises me. I think Rudolph is going to surprise some folks this year, and the Vikes will be in good hands at TE. They have many, many more pressing needs than TE to fill. Rudolph performed admirably this past season in a limited rookie role, especially with the unsettled QB situation. Unlike Finley, the guy catches everything thrown his way, he had some amazing one-handed grabs this past season. Let Shiancoe go, and give Rudolph the extra targets (plus, he’s a better blocker) I know I’ll be ripped for this…but the Vikes have got a mini-Gronk in the making.

__________________________________

Don&#039;t worry.  I will nominate you for Common Man&#039;s proposterus statement contest.... :)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>purplecrowe says:<br />
Feb 23, 2012 6:58 AM<br />
@claymath52</p>
<p>I haven’t listened to PA in a while, but all that talk kind of surprises me. I think Rudolph is going to surprise some folks this year, and the Vikes will be in good hands at TE. They have many, many more pressing needs than TE to fill. Rudolph performed admirably this past season in a limited rookie role, especially with the unsettled QB situation. Unlike Finley, the guy catches everything thrown his way, he had some amazing one-handed grabs this past season. Let Shiancoe go, and give Rudolph the extra targets (plus, he’s a better blocker) I know I’ll be ripped for this…but the Vikes have got a mini-Gronk in the making.</p>
<p>__________________________________</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t worry.  I will nominate you for Common Man&#8217;s proposterus statement contest&#8230;. <img src='http://s0.wp.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shadowgm1</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/02/22/packers-finley-work-out-two-year-contract/#comment-1590007</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[shadowgm1]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2012 17:34:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=294016#comment-1590007</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[garyman1 says:Feb 23, 2012 7:16 AM 

If I was the Pack, I would franchise NOBODY. None of the remaining free agents are worth what you would have to pay them.
 Resigning Finley is a good move although I’m not a big fan of 2 year deals…we’ll have to go through this again too soon.
________________________________________________

You may not be too far off.  They technically could agree with most of the major free agents now that dimwit here is out of the way.  Wells could cause a bit of trouble, but he knows he already plays for a champ caliber squad and Spitz is long gone.  It is, however, transition year to get a new young center in and show him the ropes.  They could also agree to a one year deal with Flynn which is trade friendly, then deal him (would generate more interest for the Dolphins, Redskins or whomever if it means an exclusive negotiating deal vs. a free agent free for all - get the agent involved and assured they get the money they want and it can be done).  Even between $8 or $12 million which is still under Rodgers&#039; $13 mil (through 2014).  Trade Flynn to a team to further negotiate an extended contract with incentives - Thompson is happy because he controls the destination to anywhere but the NFL&#039;s &quot;black hole&quot; in Minnesota which seems to be a real peeve for him (like it or not, they have a solid QB in Ponder but never seem to be satisfied and would &lt;i&gt;maybe&lt;/i&gt; take a shot with a healthier cap number following the release of Steve Hutchinson and restructuring to make a run at him); Flynn gets a starting gig and guarantees.  The tag is nice to talk about, but may not really be needed for either Flynn or Wells.  Then restructure Driver, Clifton still has leverage due to Sherrod&#039;s hideous leg injury but may be willing to restructure to get another shot at the top of the heap next season.  Everyone else up for FA is better off leaving, so really it&#039;s just down to two key players in Flynn and Wells.

As far as Finley, I highly doubt we will be going through this again.  He could be gone ambitiously as early as the draft in April or as late as preseason 2013.  Either way, mandate WILL be finding it&#039;s way downstairs for McCarthy to stop using Finley exclusively and start involving Williams and Taylor more in the system.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>garyman1 says:Feb 23, 2012 7:16 AM </p>
<p>If I was the Pack, I would franchise NOBODY. None of the remaining free agents are worth what you would have to pay them.<br />
 Resigning Finley is a good move although I’m not a big fan of 2 year deals…we’ll have to go through this again too soon.<br />
________________________________________________</p>
<p>You may not be too far off.  They technically could agree with most of the major free agents now that dimwit here is out of the way.  Wells could cause a bit of trouble, but he knows he already plays for a champ caliber squad and Spitz is long gone.  It is, however, transition year to get a new young center in and show him the ropes.  They could also agree to a one year deal with Flynn which is trade friendly, then deal him (would generate more interest for the Dolphins, Redskins or whomever if it means an exclusive negotiating deal vs. a free agent free for all &#8211; get the agent involved and assured they get the money they want and it can be done).  Even between $8 or $12 million which is still under Rodgers&#8217; $13 mil (through 2014).  Trade Flynn to a team to further negotiate an extended contract with incentives &#8211; Thompson is happy because he controls the destination to anywhere but the NFL&#8217;s &#8220;black hole&#8221; in Minnesota which seems to be a real peeve for him (like it or not, they have a solid QB in Ponder but never seem to be satisfied and would <i>maybe</i> take a shot with a healthier cap number following the release of Steve Hutchinson and restructuring to make a run at him); Flynn gets a starting gig and guarantees.  The tag is nice to talk about, but may not really be needed for either Flynn or Wells.  Then restructure Driver, Clifton still has leverage due to Sherrod&#8217;s hideous leg injury but may be willing to restructure to get another shot at the top of the heap next season.  Everyone else up for FA is better off leaving, so really it&#8217;s just down to two key players in Flynn and Wells.</p>
<p>As far as Finley, I highly doubt we will be going through this again.  He could be gone ambitiously as early as the draft in April or as late as preseason 2013.  Either way, mandate WILL be finding it&#8217;s way downstairs for McCarthy to stop using Finley exclusively and start involving Williams and Taylor more in the system.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: holdsteady76</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/02/22/packers-finley-work-out-two-year-contract/#comment-1589787</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[holdsteady76]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2012 15:18:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=294016#comment-1589787</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wonder if we will see him in those discount double choke commercials now.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wonder if we will see him in those discount double choke commercials now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gb4mn0</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/02/22/packers-finley-work-out-two-year-contract/#comment-1589626</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[gb4mn0]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2012 12:27:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=294016#comment-1589626</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is a good move. They won 15 games so why throw the baby out with the bath water. Stand pat and work on getting the outside pass rusher needed to play opposite Matthews. The playoff game &quot;hail Mary&quot; clearly illustrated that.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a good move. They won 15 games so why throw the baby out with the bath water. Stand pat and work on getting the outside pass rusher needed to play opposite Matthews. The playoff game &#8220;hail Mary&#8221; clearly illustrated that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: garyman1</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/02/22/packers-finley-work-out-two-year-contract/#comment-1589624</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[garyman1]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2012 12:16:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=294016#comment-1589624</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If I was the Pack, I would franchise NOBODY.  None of the remaining free agents are worth what you would have to pay them.
Resigning Finley is a good move although I&#039;m not a big fan of 2 year deals...we&#039;ll have to go through this again too soon.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If I was the Pack, I would franchise NOBODY.  None of the remaining free agents are worth what you would have to pay them.<br />
Resigning Finley is a good move although I&#8217;m not a big fan of 2 year deals&#8230;we&#8217;ll have to go through this again too soon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: purplecrowe</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/02/22/packers-finley-work-out-two-year-contract/#comment-1589615</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[purplecrowe]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2012 11:58:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=294016#comment-1589615</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@claymath52

I haven&#039;t listened to PA in a while, but all that talk kind of surprises me.  I think Rudolph is going to surprise some folks this year, and the Vikes will be in good hands at TE.  They have many, many more pressing needs than TE to fill.  Rudolph performed admirably this past season in a limited rookie role, especially with the unsettled QB situation.  Unlike Finley, the guy catches everything thrown his way, he had some amazing one-handed grabs this past season.  Let Shiancoe go, and give Rudolph the extra targets (plus, he&#039;s a better blocker)  I know I&#039;ll be ripped for this...but the Vikes have got a mini-Gronk in the making.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@claymath52</p>
<p>I haven&#8217;t listened to PA in a while, but all that talk kind of surprises me.  I think Rudolph is going to surprise some folks this year, and the Vikes will be in good hands at TE.  They have many, many more pressing needs than TE to fill.  Rudolph performed admirably this past season in a limited rookie role, especially with the unsettled QB situation.  Unlike Finley, the guy catches everything thrown his way, he had some amazing one-handed grabs this past season.  Let Shiancoe go, and give Rudolph the extra targets (plus, he&#8217;s a better blocker)  I know I&#8217;ll be ripped for this&#8230;but the Vikes have got a mini-Gronk in the making.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: judsonjr</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/02/22/packers-finley-work-out-two-year-contract/#comment-1589602</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[judsonjr]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2012 10:46:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=294016#comment-1589602</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yes Finley does create matchup problems.  Ballard is good, but I don&#039;t recall the Giants splitting him wide at the goalline to go 1:1 with a CB, which is probably Finley&#039;s biggest asset.  

Ballard is also actually older than Finley.  

On the plus side, Ballard doesn&#039;t have as big a mouth as Finley.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes Finley does create matchup problems.  Ballard is good, but I don&#8217;t recall the Giants splitting him wide at the goalline to go 1:1 with a CB, which is probably Finley&#8217;s biggest asset.  </p>
<p>Ballard is also actually older than Finley.  </p>
<p>On the plus side, Ballard doesn&#8217;t have as big a mouth as Finley.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: plum13sec</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/02/22/packers-finley-work-out-two-year-contract/#comment-1589597</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[plum13sec]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2012 09:58:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=294016#comment-1589597</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This kid is a stud.  He still hasnt fully shown to anyone outside of the packers coaches what he can do.  They know what they have.  Now its time to show the world.  Colts fan out]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This kid is a stud.  He still hasnt fully shown to anyone outside of the packers coaches what he can do.  They know what they have.  Now its time to show the world.  Colts fan out</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: johnnyb216</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/02/22/packers-finley-work-out-two-year-contract/#comment-1589588</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[johnnyb216]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2012 07:43:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=294016#comment-1589588</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Franchising wells is an even worse idea since it would cost us over $8 million. No way TT will pay that to somebody who doesn&#039;t even want to be there.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Franchising wells is an even worse idea since it would cost us over $8 million. No way TT will pay that to somebody who doesn&#8217;t even want to be there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: theghostoflombardi</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/02/22/packers-finley-work-out-two-year-contract/#comment-1589582</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[theghostoflombardi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2012 06:49:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=294016#comment-1589582</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Franchising Flynn is NOT a terrible idea.  The only necessary movement in order to make it work is that Clifton and Driver would either have to be cut or accept smaller contracts.

Given that both of them will be making a lot more money than they deserve, this is a move we should be doing anyway.

That allows TT to tag Flynn and trade him.  What&#039;s the worst that could happen?  We could a 4th rounder instead of a 2nd or 3rd?  It&#039;s still better than letting him walk.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Franchising Flynn is NOT a terrible idea.  The only necessary movement in order to make it work is that Clifton and Driver would either have to be cut or accept smaller contracts.</p>
<p>Given that both of them will be making a lot more money than they deserve, this is a move we should be doing anyway.</p>
<p>That allows TT to tag Flynn and trade him.  What&#8217;s the worst that could happen?  We could a 4th rounder instead of a 2nd or 3rd?  It&#8217;s still better than letting him walk.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: farvite</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/02/22/packers-finley-work-out-two-year-contract/#comment-1589580</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[farvite]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2012 06:41:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=294016#comment-1589580</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[brewcrewfan54,

No guarantee of trading Flynn? In this qb-starved League? U kidding??]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>brewcrewfan54,</p>
<p>No guarantee of trading Flynn? In this qb-starved League? U kidding??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shaggytoodle</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/02/22/packers-finley-work-out-two-year-contract/#comment-1589577</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[shaggytoodle]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2012 06:36:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=294016#comment-1589577</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[great deal

TT may stretch here at times  or in the draft, but he will NOT leave the Packers in worse shape than he recieved them in.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>great deal</p>
<p>TT may stretch here at times  or in the draft, but he will NOT leave the Packers in worse shape than he recieved them in.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: orcheon</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/02/22/packers-finley-work-out-two-year-contract/#comment-1589571</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[orcheon]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2012 06:09:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=294016#comment-1589571</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Good move by the Packers. Yes, he’s not Gronk or Graham, but that could be said about every TE not named Gronk or Graham. He’s a big, fast TE who creates matchup nightmares, and if you don’t have one of those in the NFL these days, you’re dead in the water. They need him, drops and all.

-----------------------------------------------
While I tend to agree that a big, fast TE is a great asset, you aren&#039;t dead in the water without one.  Don&#039;t need to look too far back to find a champion that didn&#039;t have one.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good move by the Packers. Yes, he’s not Gronk or Graham, but that could be said about every TE not named Gronk or Graham. He’s a big, fast TE who creates matchup nightmares, and if you don’t have one of those in the NFL these days, you’re dead in the water. They need him, drops and all.</p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;<br />
While I tend to agree that a big, fast TE is a great asset, you aren&#8217;t dead in the water without one.  Don&#8217;t need to look too far back to find a champion that didn&#8217;t have one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: effedinLA</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/02/22/packers-finley-work-out-two-year-contract/#comment-1589555</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[effedinLA]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2012 05:28:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=294016#comment-1589555</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So how much money do you think Flynn will make because of that fluke game he had week 17?
That must be one of the most profitable games ever played by a football player.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So how much money do you think Flynn will make because of that fluke game he had week 17?<br />
That must be one of the most profitable games ever played by a football player.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: supersuckers3</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/02/22/packers-finley-work-out-two-year-contract/#comment-1589538</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[supersuckers3]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2012 04:47:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=294016#comment-1589538</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[brewcrewfan54 says:Feb 22, 2012 10:55 PM 

Franchising Flynn is a terrible idea becaue there’s no guarantee of angood return for him. Then you have a bckup QB making more money than the league MVP. Yeah that will go over well.
----
If a underlying deal were to be imminent, franchising Flynn is brilliant.   To be the best you have to think like the best son.   You have to think like a chess player.  Not a checkers player.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>brewcrewfan54 says:Feb 22, 2012 10:55 PM </p>
<p>Franchising Flynn is a terrible idea becaue there’s no guarantee of angood return for him. Then you have a bckup QB making more money than the league MVP. Yeah that will go over well.<br />
&#8212;-<br />
If a underlying deal were to be imminent, franchising Flynn is brilliant.   To be the best you have to think like the best son.   You have to think like a chess player.  Not a checkers player.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lavamachine</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/02/22/packers-finley-work-out-two-year-contract/#comment-1589534</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[lavamachine]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2012 04:40:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=294016#comment-1589534</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Outstanding, if the Packer&#039;s didn&#039;t have Jennings, Jordy Nelson, James Jones, standout rookie Randall Cobb, TE deep with Crabtree, D.J Williams,  and Ryan Taylor.....who is going to get 100 balls? Really....I&#039;ll take 50 to 75 for each and watch defensive backs take a beating all day long.

Nice Job Packer&#039;s front office a beautiful thing when you have no greedy, or egotistical owner getting emotional and making bad calls. This was a great business decision in the best immediate interest of The Green Bay Packer&#039;s.

Probably the only way a non-major metropolitan city could have an elite NFL team and Facility? Come watch a game and you and who ever you come with are in for a treat! You can take that to the bank just like Finley! He will get nothing but better by the way.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Outstanding, if the Packer&#8217;s didn&#8217;t have Jennings, Jordy Nelson, James Jones, standout rookie Randall Cobb, TE deep with Crabtree, D.J Williams,  and Ryan Taylor&#8230;..who is going to get 100 balls? Really&#8230;.I&#8217;ll take 50 to 75 for each and watch defensive backs take a beating all day long.</p>
<p>Nice Job Packer&#8217;s front office a beautiful thing when you have no greedy, or egotistical owner getting emotional and making bad calls. This was a great business decision in the best immediate interest of The Green Bay Packer&#8217;s.</p>
<p>Probably the only way a non-major metropolitan city could have an elite NFL team and Facility? Come watch a game and you and who ever you come with are in for a treat! You can take that to the bank just like Finley! He will get nothing but better by the way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: packfaninvikeland</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/02/22/packers-finley-work-out-two-year-contract/#comment-1589533</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[packfaninvikeland]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2012 04:40:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=294016#comment-1589533</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[schmokes says: 
Feb 22, 2012 8:21 PM 
haha. You guys have been pushing “fight” between Finley and the Packers for months. And now when they agree to a contract, you still mention the “potential fight” that was looming….you guys are pathetic.

Probably because Finley opened his mouth and complained week after week with little production to show for it. A two year contract for a guy basically just entering his prime? You don&#039;t think there was anamosity at all. People would be pathetic to think otherwise. This contract is a back handed compliment. I still predict he will be traded. Honestly I hope he does!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>schmokes says:<br />
Feb 22, 2012 8:21 PM<br />
haha. You guys have been pushing “fight” between Finley and the Packers for months. And now when they agree to a contract, you still mention the “potential fight” that was looming….you guys are pathetic.</p>
<p>Probably because Finley opened his mouth and complained week after week with little production to show for it. A two year contract for a guy basically just entering his prime? You don&#8217;t think there was anamosity at all. People would be pathetic to think otherwise. This contract is a back handed compliment. I still predict he will be traded. Honestly I hope he does!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: brewcrewfan54</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/02/22/packers-finley-work-out-two-year-contract/#comment-1589491</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[brewcrewfan54]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2012 03:55:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=294016#comment-1589491</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Franchising Flynn is a terrible idea becaue there&#039;s no guarantee of angood return for him. Then you have a bckup QB making more money than the league MVP. Yeah that will go over well.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Franchising Flynn is a terrible idea becaue there&#8217;s no guarantee of angood return for him. Then you have a bckup QB making more money than the league MVP. Yeah that will go over well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: claymath52</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/02/22/packers-finley-work-out-two-year-contract/#comment-1589466</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[claymath52]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2012 03:28:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=294016#comment-1589466</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nice... No more listening to Paul Allen (voice of the Vikings) drool over the radio about how good a move it would be for the Vikings to go after Finley.  Not this time suckers!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice&#8230; No more listening to Paul Allen (voice of the Vikings) drool over the radio about how good a move it would be for the Vikings to go after Finley.  Not this time suckers!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: der6495</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/02/22/packers-finley-work-out-two-year-contract/#comment-1589459</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[der6495]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2012 03:24:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=294016#comment-1589459</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Franchise Flynn, trade Flynn to Dolphins. Just like Cassel to the Chiefs.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Franchise Flynn, trade Flynn to Dolphins. Just like Cassel to the Chiefs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zaggs</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/02/22/packers-finley-work-out-two-year-contract/#comment-1589446</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[zaggs]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2012 03:15:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=294016#comment-1589446</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So he creates matchup problems eh?  Jake Ballard of the Giants, not exactly a burner, had 160 less yards receiving and 4 less touchdowns in 2 less games and this was his first real year of playing.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So he creates matchup problems eh?  Jake Ballard of the Giants, not exactly a burner, had 160 less yards receiving and 4 less touchdowns in 2 less games and this was his first real year of playing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: leatherface2012</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/02/22/packers-finley-work-out-two-year-contract/#comment-1589445</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[leatherface2012]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2012 03:15:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=294016#comment-1589445</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[lot of money for hands of stone]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>lot of money for hands of stone</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zaggs</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/02/22/packers-finley-work-out-two-year-contract/#comment-1589441</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[zaggs]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2012 03:12:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=294016#comment-1589441</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;Finley could have the same impact as Rob Gronkowski,&quot;

You mean dancing shirtless after choking in big games?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Finley could have the same impact as Rob Gronkowski,&#8221;</p>
<p>You mean dancing shirtless after choking in big games?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: herlies</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/02/22/packers-finley-work-out-two-year-contract/#comment-1589435</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[herlies]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2012 03:05:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=294016#comment-1589435</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[2 year contracts are ideal for anyone who is not an already established &quot;elite&quot; QB.

I&#039;m sure Rodgers is happy.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>2 year contracts are ideal for anyone who is not an already established &#8220;elite&#8221; QB.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m sure Rodgers is happy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LoCoSu@%s</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/02/22/packers-finley-work-out-two-year-contract/#comment-1589422</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[LoCoSu@%s]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2012 02:55:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=294016#comment-1589422</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For all those hoping GB franchises Matt Flynn.
It will cost $14.4 mil. I don&#039;t see that happening.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For all those hoping GB franchises Matt Flynn.<br />
It will cost $14.4 mil. I don&#8217;t see that happening.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vikescry1</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/02/22/packers-finley-work-out-two-year-contract/#comment-1589404</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[vikescry1]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2012 02:35:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=294016#comment-1589404</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[this was a smart move on both sides, and even with his drops he is worth it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>this was a smart move on both sides, and even with his drops he is worth it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: arlingtonassasin</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/02/22/packers-finley-work-out-two-year-contract/#comment-1589401</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[arlingtonassasin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2012 02:31:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=294016#comment-1589401</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I bet Jermichael kept his shirt on after they were in the Superbowl....even after they WON IT.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I bet Jermichael kept his shirt on after they were in the Superbowl&#8230;.even after they WON IT.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: farvite</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/02/22/packers-finley-work-out-two-year-contract/#comment-1589397</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[farvite]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2012 02:27:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=294016#comment-1589397</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sweet, now they can tag Matt Flynn!!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sweet, now they can tag Matt Flynn!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
