Comments on: New CBA should have ditched “funding” requirement for guarantees http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/03/04/new-cba-should-have-ditched-funding-requirement-for-guarantees/ ProFootballTalk on NBCSports.com Fri, 24 May 2013 19:15:32 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.com/ By: pftstory http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/03/04/new-cba-should-have-ditched-funding-requirement-for-guarantees/#comment-1607911 Mon, 05 Mar 2012 00:55:02 +0000 http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=342094#comment-1607911 This is a true question for all the other “commentors” here. We keep reading here and other places how so and so reported such and such first. I don’t give a flying burito brother if ESPN, FOX, Yahoo or the local high school paper was the first to report so and so is retiring or being traded or stubbed his toe on a dildo. I also don’t care if Mortenson, McShay or Candice Flynn was the first to report it. Especially after multiple sources report it.

Does it matter to any other average Joe fan or average Joe reader? Is it just me how finds this of extreme minor importance?

(I can see the writers and networks caring. But the reader…no)

]]> By: mikebe1 http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/03/04/new-cba-should-have-ditched-funding-requirement-for-guarantees/#comment-1607614 Sun, 04 Mar 2012 22:10:24 +0000 http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=342094#comment-1607614 Boo hoo hoo I’m sure they will have a hard time payin the 5 dollars a gallon gas like the rest of america.

]]>