<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Vincent Jackson could be Robert Griffin III&#8217;s top receiver</title>
	<atom:link href="http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/03/11/vincent-jackson-could-be-robert-griffin-iiis-top-receiver/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/03/11/vincent-jackson-could-be-robert-griffin-iiis-top-receiver/</link>
	<description>ProFootballTalk on NBCSports.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 15:41:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: gweez76</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/03/11/vincent-jackson-could-be-robert-griffin-iiis-top-receiver/#comment-1625545</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[gweez76]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Mar 2012 19:22:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=375175#comment-1625545</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Gesuk,

I was kidding,  lighten up kid.  We are minimum 2 years away but not as far off as some.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gesuk,</p>
<p>I was kidding,  lighten up kid.  We are minimum 2 years away but not as far off as some.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: slickzmoney</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/03/11/vincent-jackson-could-be-robert-griffin-iiis-top-receiver/#comment-1625497</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[slickzmoney]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Mar 2012 19:03:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=375175#comment-1625497</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;d pass on Garcon - too many drops.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d pass on Garcon &#8211; too many drops.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: skinsdiehard</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/03/11/vincent-jackson-could-be-robert-griffin-iiis-top-receiver/#comment-1625477</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[skinsdiehard]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Mar 2012 18:53:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=375175#comment-1625477</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[cmarsh64 says: 
Mar 11, 2012 8:57 AM 
Until Washington gets an OL RGIII won’t matter if he’s being chased by NFL DE’s and LB’s that can chase him down. The Redskins have signed WR’s before and they all failed in Washington with 1 exception Santana Moss. They must also find a running game and a back who can stay healthy.There are alot of holes to fill in Washington and 40 mil this year won’t fix them all.You are losing Fletcher and Landry on Def and that exp you just can’t replace in 1 year just ask Eagles fans how the Dream Team worked out! If the Redskins don’t finish 8-8 or better those 1st rd picks in 2013 and 2014 will hurt the team because they can’t get the blue chip players in rd 1.
-----------------------------------------
This is so ignorant.  The Skins have a blue-chip LT and a good OLine.  Check the rushing per carry stats from 2011.  They averaged 4.0 yards per carry (22nd - better than Giants, Patriots, Packers, Bengals, Seahawks and Falcons.  Teams that you probably respect).  Also, the OL allowed 41 sacks (21st - better than Packers, Steelers, 49ers and Broncos - playoff teams).  The QB makes the difference.  I don&#039;t understand all of the fervor over two picks in 2013 and 2014 that will ruin the team.  It&#039;s asinine.  Santana Moss was acquired via trade for Laveranues Coles in 2005, not a free agent.  Moss made the pro-bowl in 2005 and led the Skins to the playoffs.  What failure?  The only free agent WR that Washington signed were Randle El and Lloyd.  Last I checked Lloyd is a sought-after player still.  Randle El was a decent slot receiver for a while and contributed to our 2007 playoff team.  Landry can&#039;t stay healthy and Fletcher will be 37.  It&#039;s okay to lose Fletcher and Landry.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>cmarsh64 says:<br />
Mar 11, 2012 8:57 AM<br />
Until Washington gets an OL RGIII won’t matter if he’s being chased by NFL DE’s and LB’s that can chase him down. The Redskins have signed WR’s before and they all failed in Washington with 1 exception Santana Moss. They must also find a running game and a back who can stay healthy.There are alot of holes to fill in Washington and 40 mil this year won’t fix them all.You are losing Fletcher and Landry on Def and that exp you just can’t replace in 1 year just ask Eagles fans how the Dream Team worked out! If the Redskins don’t finish 8-8 or better those 1st rd picks in 2013 and 2014 will hurt the team because they can’t get the blue chip players in rd 1.<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;<br />
This is so ignorant.  The Skins have a blue-chip LT and a good OLine.  Check the rushing per carry stats from 2011.  They averaged 4.0 yards per carry (22nd &#8211; better than Giants, Patriots, Packers, Bengals, Seahawks and Falcons.  Teams that you probably respect).  Also, the OL allowed 41 sacks (21st &#8211; better than Packers, Steelers, 49ers and Broncos &#8211; playoff teams).  The QB makes the difference.  I don&#8217;t understand all of the fervor over two picks in 2013 and 2014 that will ruin the team.  It&#8217;s asinine.  Santana Moss was acquired via trade for Laveranues Coles in 2005, not a free agent.  Moss made the pro-bowl in 2005 and led the Skins to the playoffs.  What failure?  The only free agent WR that Washington signed were Randle El and Lloyd.  Last I checked Lloyd is a sought-after player still.  Randle El was a decent slot receiver for a while and contributed to our 2007 playoff team.  Landry can&#8217;t stay healthy and Fletcher will be 37.  It&#8217;s okay to lose Fletcher and Landry.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cfos00</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/03/11/vincent-jackson-could-be-robert-griffin-iiis-top-receiver/#comment-1625380</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[cfos00]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Mar 2012 18:13:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=375175#comment-1625380</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Two things seem off on this.  The age of Jackson, and other needs that also require attention to keep RGIII upright.  The o-line could  really use some help, and there are only a few really good linemen on the market.  And why go for a WR that has a couple years left in his prime when you can sign a guy just entering his prime?  Makes a lot more sense to go after a guy that can grow with RGIII than to sign a guy that has a few years and then will probably be on the downside of his career.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Two things seem off on this.  The age of Jackson, and other needs that also require attention to keep RGIII upright.  The o-line could  really use some help, and there are only a few really good linemen on the market.  And why go for a WR that has a couple years left in his prime when you can sign a guy just entering his prime?  Makes a lot more sense to go after a guy that can grow with RGIII than to sign a guy that has a few years and then will probably be on the downside of his career.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tom-a-hawk</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/03/11/vincent-jackson-could-be-robert-griffin-iiis-top-receiver/#comment-1625234</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[tom-a-hawk]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Mar 2012 17:27:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=375175#comment-1625234</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@satanphoenix says:
Mar 11, 2012 7:56 AM
They really don’t have a choice but free agency since they lost all their draft picks with the RGIII trade now do they?
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Yup, sure does suck getting RGIII, and STILL having 7 picks in the upcoming April draft….man, the average American sports fan is an idiot.

++++++++++++++++++++
@stunzeed5:
you&#039;re spot on!  redskins got younger through the draft last year, will get quality again this year with their 7 picks, and still have draft picks in 2013 and 2014.  
it&#039;s funny to see people like @satanphoenix to repost nonsense that they probably read on some other message board.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@satanphoenix says:<br />
Mar 11, 2012 7:56 AM<br />
They really don’t have a choice but free agency since they lost all their draft picks with the RGIII trade now do they?<br />
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++</p>
<p>Yup, sure does suck getting RGIII, and STILL having 7 picks in the upcoming April draft….man, the average American sports fan is an idiot.</p>
<p>++++++++++++++++++++<br />
@stunzeed5:<br />
you&#8217;re spot on!  redskins got younger through the draft last year, will get quality again this year with their 7 picks, and still have draft picks in 2013 and 2014.<br />
it&#8217;s funny to see people like @satanphoenix to repost nonsense that they probably read on some other message board.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jbcommonsense</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/03/11/vincent-jackson-could-be-robert-griffin-iiis-top-receiver/#comment-1625223</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jbcommonsense]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Mar 2012 17:22:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=375175#comment-1625223</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A worthy FA spree would have the Redskins get two WRs, including V-Jax or Colston, and either Meachem, Garcon, Wayne or Manningham.  Then pick up a guard like Nicks and an RT.  Resign Fletcher at MLB and RB Hightower.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A worthy FA spree would have the Redskins get two WRs, including V-Jax or Colston, and either Meachem, Garcon, Wayne or Manningham.  Then pick up a guard like Nicks and an RT.  Resign Fletcher at MLB and RB Hightower.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reach4succeed</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/03/11/vincent-jackson-could-be-robert-griffin-iiis-top-receiver/#comment-1625186</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[reach4succeed]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Mar 2012 17:09:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=375175#comment-1625186</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Like the sweet fragrance nectar that draws the bee to the flower. Wide receivers and offensive lineman will be falling over one another for the sacred right to play with the anointed one-Mr. RG III. YES!!!!!!! The Washington Redskins are Americas new team.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Like the sweet fragrance nectar that draws the bee to the flower. Wide receivers and offensive lineman will be falling over one another for the sacred right to play with the anointed one-Mr. RG III. YES!!!!!!! The Washington Redskins are Americas new team.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thunderskins007</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/03/11/vincent-jackson-could-be-robert-griffin-iiis-top-receiver/#comment-1625124</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[thunderskins007]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Mar 2012 16:54:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=375175#comment-1625124</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[i am not opposed in landing vincent jackson, i think we would have to overpay to get him though and he can be a headache at times. i think we can go younger, cheaper, and better character with colston, garcon, manningham. and could get possibly 2 of em for cheaper than vincent jackson. we do have some pressing holes and ?&#039;s at safety, o-line, cb, and linebacker. as much as some in washington think, WE DON&#039;T HAVE A TEAM THAT CAN WIN NOW. we have some work to do, so to allen and shanahan let&#039;s be smart and patient about our 40+mil of cap space. it does&#039;nt have to be all done in one offseason.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i am not opposed in landing vincent jackson, i think we would have to overpay to get him though and he can be a headache at times. i think we can go younger, cheaper, and better character with colston, garcon, manningham. and could get possibly 2 of em for cheaper than vincent jackson. we do have some pressing holes and ?&#8217;s at safety, o-line, cb, and linebacker. as much as some in washington think, WE DON&#8217;T HAVE A TEAM THAT CAN WIN NOW. we have some work to do, so to allen and shanahan let&#8217;s be smart and patient about our 40+mil of cap space. it does&#8217;nt have to be all done in one offseason.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stunzeed5</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/03/11/vincent-jackson-could-be-robert-griffin-iiis-top-receiver/#comment-1625095</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[stunzeed5]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Mar 2012 16:47:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=375175#comment-1625095</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@satanphoenix says:
Mar 11, 2012 7:56 AM
They really don’t have a choice but free agency since they lost all their draft picks with the RGIII trade now do they?
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Yup, sure does suck getting RGIII, and STILL having 7 picks in the upcoming April draft....man, the average American sports fan is an idiot.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@satanphoenix says:<br />
Mar 11, 2012 7:56 AM<br />
They really don’t have a choice but free agency since they lost all their draft picks with the RGIII trade now do they?<br />
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++</p>
<p>Yup, sure does suck getting RGIII, and STILL having 7 picks in the upcoming April draft&#8230;.man, the average American sports fan is an idiot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stunzeed5</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/03/11/vincent-jackson-could-be-robert-griffin-iiis-top-receiver/#comment-1625088</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[stunzeed5]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Mar 2012 16:45:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=375175#comment-1625088</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@tom35mt says:
Mar 11, 2012 7:45 AM
Why not overpay for Randy Moss, that’s the reskins way.
====================================

Why don&#039;t you &quot;overpay&quot; for a dictionary? 

Wow....seriously, &quot;reskins&quot;?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@tom35mt says:<br />
Mar 11, 2012 7:45 AM<br />
Why not overpay for Randy Moss, that’s the reskins way.<br />
====================================</p>
<p>Why don&#8217;t you &#8220;overpay&#8221; for a dictionary? </p>
<p>Wow&#8230;.seriously, &#8220;reskins&#8221;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: katrinasafterbirth</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/03/11/vincent-jackson-could-be-robert-griffin-iiis-top-receiver/#comment-1625035</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[katrinasafterbirth]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Mar 2012 16:23:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=375175#comment-1625035</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[tonyromoisterrible says:Mar 11, 2012 10:58 AM 
 says:

 One draft pick for each of the next three years is hardly mortgaging the future. This site just allows a platform for idiots like you to show the world how truly stupid you are. The SKINS traded picks in round one, they don’t have a second (lost draft pick). They don’t have a number one next year and in 2014. Thats three draft picks. You wouldn’t trade 3 draft picks for Aaron Rodgers, Drew Brees, Eli Manning, or Cam Newton? If you wouldn’t then your even more stupid than even I anticipate. Jerry Jones would have traded his whole roster to get a franchise QB that doesn’t choke in the spot light. Eat a d1zzle.

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Your analogy is dumb.  You&#039;re assuming that the other picks would be irrelvant.  Would you have three #1 picks to get Steve Young or Brett Favre?  What if those 3 #1 picks turned out to be Aikman, Irvin, and Smith??  Also, now you&#039;re gambing that the Foreskins can find some late round steals...ha, they can&#039;t even get it right in the first 10 picks.  They&#039;re picks are usually busts, injury prone, or are taking knives to gun fights...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>tonyromoisterrible says:Mar 11, 2012 10:58 AM<br />
 says:</p>
<p> One draft pick for each of the next three years is hardly mortgaging the future. This site just allows a platform for idiots like you to show the world how truly stupid you are. The SKINS traded picks in round one, they don’t have a second (lost draft pick). They don’t have a number one next year and in 2014. Thats three draft picks. You wouldn’t trade 3 draft picks for Aaron Rodgers, Drew Brees, Eli Manning, or Cam Newton? If you wouldn’t then your even more stupid than even I anticipate. Jerry Jones would have traded his whole roster to get a franchise QB that doesn’t choke in the spot light. Eat a d1zzle.</p>
<p>++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++</p>
<p>Your analogy is dumb.  You&#8217;re assuming that the other picks would be irrelvant.  Would you have three #1 picks to get Steve Young or Brett Favre?  What if those 3 #1 picks turned out to be Aikman, Irvin, and Smith??  Also, now you&#8217;re gambing that the Foreskins can find some late round steals&#8230;ha, they can&#8217;t even get it right in the first 10 picks.  They&#8217;re picks are usually busts, injury prone, or are taking knives to gun fights&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: flsnupe</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/03/11/vincent-jackson-could-be-robert-griffin-iiis-top-receiver/#comment-1624987</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[flsnupe]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Mar 2012 16:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=375175#comment-1624987</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[bucks12965 says:
Mar 11, 2012 9:00 AM


But why is a Houston talk-radio host being cited as a source regarding who the Skins may pick up?
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Tony Wiley, former VP of PR in Houston is now in DC.  Many of his former staff are too.  Nevertheless, connections built in H-town or anywhere else is never disconnected.  Same with Denver and Adam S and Shanahan.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>bucks12965 says:<br />
Mar 11, 2012 9:00 AM</p>
<p>But why is a Houston talk-radio host being cited as a source regarding who the Skins may pick up?<br />
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++</p>
<p>Tony Wiley, former VP of PR in Houston is now in DC.  Many of his former staff are too.  Nevertheless, connections built in H-town or anywhere else is never disconnected.  Same with Denver and Adam S and Shanahan.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pauliewalnutz</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/03/11/vincent-jackson-could-be-robert-griffin-iiis-top-receiver/#comment-1624897</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[pauliewalnutz]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Mar 2012 15:33:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=375175#comment-1624897</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ahh, I love reading some of these dumb and inaccurate comments from all the Redskins&#039; haters out there; u all saying the skins gave up too much in the trade, obviously don&#039;t know football....All I keep hearing is how stupid the skins are for giving up so much when in all reality we didnt. First off, the skins didn&#039;t lose or give-up 3 1st rdrs, they TRADED this yrs 1st for an even better 1st (2nd overall) ensuring that we grab our franchise QB for the next 10 yrs. This yr all we lost was our 2nd round pk.... that&#039;s it, ONE 2nd rdr.... As for the 2 future 1st rounders we traded, only time will tell if they were worth losing,  If the skins make it to the playoffs the next 2 yrs, those 1st rounders will land somewhere in the 20&#039;s and dont look so attractive anymore. Plus, with masterminds like Bruce Allen and Old Shanny now running the draft, I would be shocked if we didn&#039;t recoup one of those 1st rdrs we lost)....So 3 TOTAL picks to land RG3, a QB with all the intangibles, right attitude, finally a franchise QB Washington has been thriving for for decades. I absolutely love this trade b/c we are getting a freak of a qb and we only spent 3 draft picks spread out over 3 yrs (losing one each over the next 3 drafts.) I love the trade and what the skins are doing. We had a phenomenal draft last year and u might as well grade this yr&#039;s draft an A too b/c Washington is about to take over the NFC East with RG3 running the show......HAIL!!!!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ahh, I love reading some of these dumb and inaccurate comments from all the Redskins&#8217; haters out there; u all saying the skins gave up too much in the trade, obviously don&#8217;t know football&#8230;.All I keep hearing is how stupid the skins are for giving up so much when in all reality we didnt. First off, the skins didn&#8217;t lose or give-up 3 1st rdrs, they TRADED this yrs 1st for an even better 1st (2nd overall) ensuring that we grab our franchise QB for the next 10 yrs. This yr all we lost was our 2nd round pk&#8230;. that&#8217;s it, ONE 2nd rdr&#8230;. As for the 2 future 1st rounders we traded, only time will tell if they were worth losing,  If the skins make it to the playoffs the next 2 yrs, those 1st rounders will land somewhere in the 20&#8242;s and dont look so attractive anymore. Plus, with masterminds like Bruce Allen and Old Shanny now running the draft, I would be shocked if we didn&#8217;t recoup one of those 1st rdrs we lost)&#8230;.So 3 TOTAL picks to land RG3, a QB with all the intangibles, right attitude, finally a franchise QB Washington has been thriving for for decades. I absolutely love this trade b/c we are getting a freak of a qb and we only spent 3 draft picks spread out over 3 yrs (losing one each over the next 3 drafts.) I love the trade and what the skins are doing. We had a phenomenal draft last year and u might as well grade this yr&#8217;s draft an A too b/c Washington is about to take over the NFC East with RG3 running the show&#8230;&#8230;HAIL!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: skinsrock</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/03/11/vincent-jackson-could-be-robert-griffin-iiis-top-receiver/#comment-1624865</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[skinsrock]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Mar 2012 15:24:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=375175#comment-1624865</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I see the Redskins locking up Carl Nicks, V Jax, &amp; Courtland Finnegan...  There&#039;s your 2 first rounders &amp; a second we gave away...  We used to outbid everyone when we were up against the cap...  So what do you think the outcome will be when we have 49 million salary cap space?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I see the Redskins locking up Carl Nicks, V Jax, &amp; Courtland Finnegan&#8230;  There&#8217;s your 2 first rounders &amp; a second we gave away&#8230;  We used to outbid everyone when we were up against the cap&#8230;  So what do you think the outcome will be when we have 49 million salary cap space?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tropboi11</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/03/11/vincent-jackson-could-be-robert-griffin-iiis-top-receiver/#comment-1624859</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[tropboi11]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Mar 2012 15:22:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=375175#comment-1624859</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Stop bailing Bruce Allen out, the guy is a joke. And he might not have been the one to sign Fat Albert and thats because he got outbid for him (thank God), he was next in the running for him while he was the GM in Tampa. Allen made the worst draft choices in Tampa (do a recap of the 2008 draft, he took WR Dexter Jackson in the 2nd round, does anyone remember him?) and he also passed on AP and took Gaines Adams (im sure everyone knows what happened to him, r.i.p.), if the RG3 thing dosent work out you will begin to understand what im talking about, good luck thou.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stop bailing Bruce Allen out, the guy is a joke. And he might not have been the one to sign Fat Albert and thats because he got outbid for him (thank God), he was next in the running for him while he was the GM in Tampa. Allen made the worst draft choices in Tampa (do a recap of the 2008 draft, he took WR Dexter Jackson in the 2nd round, does anyone remember him?) and he also passed on AP and took Gaines Adams (im sure everyone knows what happened to him, r.i.p.), if the RG3 thing dosent work out you will begin to understand what im talking about, good luck thou.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cali49er707</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/03/11/vincent-jackson-could-be-robert-griffin-iiis-top-receiver/#comment-1624846</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[cali49er707]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Mar 2012 15:19:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=375175#comment-1624846</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[its a 2 team race washington vs chicago                                            
who is gonna overpay???]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>its a 2 team race washington vs chicago<br />
who is gonna overpay???</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: udwnwitjpp</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/03/11/vincent-jackson-could-be-robert-griffin-iiis-top-receiver/#comment-1624835</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[udwnwitjpp]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Mar 2012 15:14:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=375175#comment-1624835</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As a giants fan i hope rg3 is the starter for the skins this year yessssssssss and i say that with confidence #sb46chammps]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a giants fan i hope rg3 is the starter for the skins this year yessssssssss and i say that with confidence #sb46chammps</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: erod22</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/03/11/vincent-jackson-could-be-robert-griffin-iiis-top-receiver/#comment-1624819</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[erod22]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Mar 2012 15:09:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=375175#comment-1624819</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So if Washington gets caught up in Bounty-gate and loses a first round pick, then what?  Seems the league shouldn&#039;t approve the trade just yet.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So if Washington gets caught up in Bounty-gate and loses a first round pick, then what?  Seems the league shouldn&#8217;t approve the trade just yet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bryjord</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/03/11/vincent-jackson-could-be-robert-griffin-iiis-top-receiver/#comment-1624813</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[bryjord]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Mar 2012 15:07:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=375175#comment-1624813</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I liked the trade but the arrogant attitude of the Redskins &quot;fans&quot; is funny. That stadium was half empty and the radio was full of calls saying to fire Allen and Shanahan last season and now after a new QB(again), they are super bowl contenders for the next decade?

Sorry, but that is not how it works. RG3 is a very good player and could be a long term star QB. But, San Diego had Vincent Jackson, a very good QB and a better team and won nothing.

Long way to go for the Skins, and I don&#039;t think they have the front office brains to pull off building an entire team around a QB to win. All of the current SB winners build primarily through the draft (GB, PITT, NY).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I liked the trade but the arrogant attitude of the Redskins &#8220;fans&#8221; is funny. That stadium was half empty and the radio was full of calls saying to fire Allen and Shanahan last season and now after a new QB(again), they are super bowl contenders for the next decade?</p>
<p>Sorry, but that is not how it works. RG3 is a very good player and could be a long term star QB. But, San Diego had Vincent Jackson, a very good QB and a better team and won nothing.</p>
<p>Long way to go for the Skins, and I don&#8217;t think they have the front office brains to pull off building an entire team around a QB to win. All of the current SB winners build primarily through the draft (GB, PITT, NY).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tonyromoisterrible</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/03/11/vincent-jackson-could-be-robert-griffin-iiis-top-receiver/#comment-1624787</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[tonyromoisterrible]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Mar 2012 14:58:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=375175#comment-1624787</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[katrinasafterbirth says:
Mar 11, 2012 8:10 AM
After giving up the future just for Robbie, why would anyone go to Washington? Look at the big picture…unless VJax likes catching balls while getting thumped upon for the rest of his career. That trade was so bad, that even Jerry Jones wouldn’t have made it.

Dan Snyder must believe in the Mayans, that is why he’s not looking past this year.

___________________________________
One draft pick for each of the next three years is hardly mortgaging the future.  This site just allows a platform for idiots like you to show the world how truly stupid you are.  The SKINS traded picks in round one, they don&#039;t have a second (lost draft pick).  They don&#039;t have a number one next year and in 2014.  Thats three draft picks.  You wouldn&#039;t trade 3 draft picks for Aaron Rodgers, Drew Brees, Eli Manning, or Cam Newton?  If you wouldn&#039;t then your even more stupid than even I anticipate.  Jerry Jones would have traded his whole roster to get a franchise QB that doesn&#039;t choke in the spot light.  Eat a d1zzle.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>katrinasafterbirth says:<br />
Mar 11, 2012 8:10 AM<br />
After giving up the future just for Robbie, why would anyone go to Washington? Look at the big picture…unless VJax likes catching balls while getting thumped upon for the rest of his career. That trade was so bad, that even Jerry Jones wouldn’t have made it.</p>
<p>Dan Snyder must believe in the Mayans, that is why he’s not looking past this year.</p>
<p>___________________________________<br />
One draft pick for each of the next three years is hardly mortgaging the future.  This site just allows a platform for idiots like you to show the world how truly stupid you are.  The SKINS traded picks in round one, they don&#8217;t have a second (lost draft pick).  They don&#8217;t have a number one next year and in 2014.  Thats three draft picks.  You wouldn&#8217;t trade 3 draft picks for Aaron Rodgers, Drew Brees, Eli Manning, or Cam Newton?  If you wouldn&#8217;t then your even more stupid than even I anticipate.  Jerry Jones would have traded his whole roster to get a franchise QB that doesn&#8217;t choke in the spot light.  Eat a d1zzle.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mwcarolina</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/03/11/vincent-jackson-could-be-robert-griffin-iiis-top-receiver/#comment-1624771</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[mwcarolina]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Mar 2012 14:49:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=375175#comment-1624771</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Does one think that an all pro WR like Jackson wants to get his passes from a rookie?
----------------------------------------------------
uh, ask Steve Smith, he sure loved it. as for VJax, i expect him to decide between 3 teams who offer him more money, and i think it&#039;s down to Chicago vs. Washington.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does one think that an all pro WR like Jackson wants to get his passes from a rookie?<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-<br />
uh, ask Steve Smith, he sure loved it. as for VJax, i expect him to decide between 3 teams who offer him more money, and i think it&#8217;s down to Chicago vs. Washington.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bigjdve</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/03/11/vincent-jackson-could-be-robert-griffin-iiis-top-receiver/#comment-1624764</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[bigjdve]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Mar 2012 14:44:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=375175#comment-1624764</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I would like to see Vjax as a Redskin. It would also be nice to see Garcon as competition for the other receivers. 

I like what Brian Mitchell said yesterday. 

The Redskins made the trade yesterday in order to set themselves up for free agency. 

Look for them to pick up 1 - 2 receivers, 1 - 2 OL, hopefully a CB. 

Someone mentioned Mike Wallace, the Steelers put a 1st rd tender on him so as to get something in return for him. They know that they can&#039;t keep him past this year as they prefer Antonio Brown. So he could possibly be had for less maybe a 3rd and 5th. It might be interesting.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would like to see Vjax as a Redskin. It would also be nice to see Garcon as competition for the other receivers. </p>
<p>I like what Brian Mitchell said yesterday. </p>
<p>The Redskins made the trade yesterday in order to set themselves up for free agency. </p>
<p>Look for them to pick up 1 &#8211; 2 receivers, 1 &#8211; 2 OL, hopefully a CB. </p>
<p>Someone mentioned Mike Wallace, the Steelers put a 1st rd tender on him so as to get something in return for him. They know that they can&#8217;t keep him past this year as they prefer Antonio Brown. So he could possibly be had for less maybe a 3rd and 5th. It might be interesting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: majbobby</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/03/11/vincent-jackson-could-be-robert-griffin-iiis-top-receiver/#comment-1624742</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[majbobby]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Mar 2012 14:36:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=375175#comment-1624742</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From what I hear about VJax is is going to be about the money. I am also hearing Buffalo Bills have a 6 Year 68M deal sitting for him.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From what I hear about VJax is is going to be about the money. I am also hearing Buffalo Bills have a 6 Year 68M deal sitting for him.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gweez76</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/03/11/vincent-jackson-could-be-robert-griffin-iiis-top-receiver/#comment-1624728</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[gweez76]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Mar 2012 14:30:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=375175#comment-1624728</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m a Skins fan but McNabb was a bad move by Shanny.  He owns that.  Fair critism.

Albert has nothing to do with Shanny.  In fact Shanny just treated him like everyone else.  It was his decision to shape up or ship out.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m a Skins fan but McNabb was a bad move by Shanny.  He owns that.  Fair critism.</p>
<p>Albert has nothing to do with Shanny.  In fact Shanny just treated him like everyone else.  It was his decision to shape up or ship out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gcsuk</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/03/11/vincent-jackson-could-be-robert-griffin-iiis-top-receiver/#comment-1624724</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[gcsuk]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Mar 2012 14:27:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=375175#comment-1624724</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[gweez76 says:
Mar 11, 2012 8:14 AM
Get your boo hoo boxes Girls, Uggles and Gmen.

3 wins off the division with Beck and Grossman starting. Youngest team in the division.

You’ve had your 20 year run, you’ve had your fun.

Time to be subjugated again.
-----------------------------------------------------------

skinsfantom says:
Mar 11, 2012 9:55 AM
Make room in the SB TROPHY CASE WOOOO! and don’t 4get to HAIL!!!
-----------------------------------------------------------

Do you guys remember what happened to the Eagles (and their fans) after they &quot;won&quot; the off-season last year? Being optimistic is one thing...that&#039;s part of being a fan. But &quot;subjugated&quot;? Lighten up, son.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>gweez76 says:<br />
Mar 11, 2012 8:14 AM<br />
Get your boo hoo boxes Girls, Uggles and Gmen.</p>
<p>3 wins off the division with Beck and Grossman starting. Youngest team in the division.</p>
<p>You’ve had your 20 year run, you’ve had your fun.</p>
<p>Time to be subjugated again.<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;</p>
<p>skinsfantom says:<br />
Mar 11, 2012 9:55 AM<br />
Make room in the SB TROPHY CASE WOOOO! and don’t 4get to HAIL!!!<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;</p>
<p>Do you guys remember what happened to the Eagles (and their fans) after they &#8220;won&#8221; the off-season last year? Being optimistic is one thing&#8230;that&#8217;s part of being a fan. But &#8220;subjugated&#8221;? Lighten up, son.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lanzurrah</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/03/11/vincent-jackson-could-be-robert-griffin-iiis-top-receiver/#comment-1624717</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[lanzurrah]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Mar 2012 14:23:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=375175#comment-1624717</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Jackson simply isn&#039;t a dominant receiver. He rarely makes clutch catches, is a complete knucklehead, and disappears in crunch time. There&#039;s a huge contingent of charger fans that don&#039;t even want him.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jackson simply isn&#8217;t a dominant receiver. He rarely makes clutch catches, is a complete knucklehead, and disappears in crunch time. There&#8217;s a huge contingent of charger fans that don&#8217;t even want him.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ohcomeonthatsfunny</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/03/11/vincent-jackson-could-be-robert-griffin-iiis-top-receiver/#comment-1624712</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ohcomeonthatsfunny]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Mar 2012 14:19:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=375175#comment-1624712</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[To the folks pointing out bad free agent signings... heres  a history lesson. McNabb was a TRADE &amp; had his last year of his contract redone to give that worthless turd a few million to stop crying after the benching. That DEAL allowed us to walk away from him after the season. Ergo... beautiful work by Allen. Also, Allen wasn&#039;t here to bring in Fat Albert... we have Vinny C to thank for that $45 million inappropriate touching experiment...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To the folks pointing out bad free agent signings&#8230; heres  a history lesson. McNabb was a TRADE &amp; had his last year of his contract redone to give that worthless turd a few million to stop crying after the benching. That DEAL allowed us to walk away from him after the season. Ergo&#8230; beautiful work by Allen. Also, Allen wasn&#8217;t here to bring in Fat Albert&#8230; we have Vinny C to thank for that $45 million inappropriate touching experiment&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: imopen7</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/03/11/vincent-jackson-could-be-robert-griffin-iiis-top-receiver/#comment-1624694</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[imopen7]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Mar 2012 14:11:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=375175#comment-1624694</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[u mean rg tray could be vincent jackson&#039;s #1 qb?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>u mean rg tray could be vincent jackson&#8217;s #1 qb?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gweez76</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/03/11/vincent-jackson-could-be-robert-griffin-iiis-top-receiver/#comment-1624671</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[gweez76]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Mar 2012 13:56:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=375175#comment-1624671</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[^ What are you talking about?  4:01 he becomes a UFA.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>^ What are you talking about?  4:01 he becomes a UFA.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: skinsfantom</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/03/11/vincent-jackson-could-be-robert-griffin-iiis-top-receiver/#comment-1624669</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[skinsfantom]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Mar 2012 13:55:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=375175#comment-1624669</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Make room in the SB TROPHY CASE WOOOO! and don&#039;t 4get to HAIL!!!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Make room in the SB TROPHY CASE WOOOO! and don&#8217;t 4get to HAIL!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
