Skip to content

NFL not blocking, but not helping, NFLPA’s bounty investigation

Getty Images

Last week, the NFLPA said that it plans to conduct its own investigation regarding the Saints’ bounty program.  The union asked the NFL to facilitate interviews of Saints coaches and other team employees.

Mike Freeman of reports that the NFL has informed the union that, while it won’t block the NFLPA from conducting an investigation, the league won’t help.

It’s a distinction without a difference, except for the fact that the NFL is far more likely to avoid any potential legal trouble by not affirmatively preventing the union from conducting an investigation.  Unless the league directs Saints’ non-player employees to cooperate with the NFLPA, the Saints’ non-player employees surely won’t.

Freeman also reports that the NFLPA has interviewed multiple Saints players as part of the union’s investigation.

Meanwhile, multiple reports have indicated that a decision on punishment is expected this week.  This week will be over soon.

The bounty scandal surely won’t be.

Permalink 15 Comments Feed for comments Latest Stories in: Home, New Orleans Saints, Rumor Mill
15 Responses to “NFL not blocking, but not helping, NFLPA’s bounty investigation”
  1. lombardihero says: Mar 16, 2012 12:42 AM

    It’s a union they are going to try to protect as many players as possible that is there job.

    The problem is the people running and knowing the program existed admitted to it while others wanted to deny it and pretend it never happened.

  2. jacobslatter says: Mar 16, 2012 1:05 AM

    May Gregg Williams NFL coaching career rest in peace.

  3. pacificnw7722 says: Mar 16, 2012 1:10 AM

    Gregg Williams ran the Bounty program for 3 friggin’ years and he admitted that.

    3 year suspension coming minimum…… a possible lifetime ban is in the cards also.

  4. broke2broker says: Mar 16, 2012 1:48 AM

    This has been going on since the birth of football. All who think differently are foolish. Not saying it’s right or wrong. Just saying it is what it has been.

  5. toiletking says: Mar 16, 2012 2:25 AM

    This country is going to hell. You do this to football, you may as well vote for Obama and burn the flag over the graves of our troops.

  6. adlent says: Mar 16, 2012 7:10 AM

    Of course the league isn’t interested in helping the NFLPA… they don’t need the union anymore to punish other franchises after the fact…

  7. wtfru2 says: Mar 16, 2012 7:21 AM

    What happened to the “sources close to the situation” telling us that punishment would be handed down this week? Maybe they’re not so close?

  8. thcnote says: Mar 16, 2012 8:20 AM

    Unions suck.

  9. icdogg says: Mar 16, 2012 8:23 AM

    Maybe the league has its hands full with other stuff this week? What is the rush to get this done? Unless they specifically wanted to bury the news in the midst of free agency excitement, that is.

  10. squealerweasel says: Mar 16, 2012 8:37 AM

    My take is that the “League” is trying to time the release up just right, so that the media and fans are so busy chasing another story, the NFL can slip by “very weak” sanctions and penalties. There is no other reason. They have the information about the bounty program, they have documented information about “outside money” offered to fund the program, they even have an addmitted statements that it continue after the “League” ask for it to cease. The League is waiting for a “Sandusky” moment to distract the masses.

  11. sj39 says: Mar 16, 2012 8:43 AM

    I just wish they would hand down the punishments. I guess that’s just not a very pleasent can of worms to open though.

  12. momsasaynt says: Mar 16, 2012 9:19 AM

    So how does this work, the NFLPA investigates accusations that some of their members tried to hurt or “take out” some of their other members. That’s like the right hand seeing what the left hands doing.

  13. r0b1b0y says: Mar 16, 2012 9:25 AM

    to the chagrin of sports writers and vikings fans this “scandal” has all but lost its steam….yawn

  14. mjkelly77 says: Mar 16, 2012 9:39 AM

    If they ban Gregg Williams for condoning it, what happens to the players who actually took part in it? They’re the ones who intentionally tried to hurt their fellow NFLPA brothers.

  15. pat940 says: Mar 16, 2012 10:33 AM

    The union will try and make it seem like the coaches and front office employees(all non union) are the ones ultimately responsible.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to leave a comment. Not a member? Register now!