<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Even at a devalued position, Richardson&#8217;s talent too great to pass up</title>
	<atom:link href="http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/03/27/even-at-a-devalued-position-richardsons-talent-too-great-to-pass-up/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/03/27/even-at-a-devalued-position-richardsons-talent-too-great-to-pass-up/</link>
	<description>ProFootballTalk on NBCSports.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 15:35:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: hmbutter49</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/03/27/even-at-a-devalued-position-richardsons-talent-too-great-to-pass-up/#comment-1684803</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[hmbutter49]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2012 07:48:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=435149#comment-1684803</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@kir
most of those players are replaceable, even arian foster, i bet you ben tate would put up really similar numbers with the full time job. i&#039;ll give you peterson, mjd, mccoy, rice and maybe forte, but shonn green? are you f-ing kidding me? demarco murray?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@kir<br />
most of those players are replaceable, even arian foster, i bet you ben tate would put up really similar numbers with the full time job. i&#8217;ll give you peterson, mjd, mccoy, rice and maybe forte, but shonn green? are you f-ing kidding me? demarco murray?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hmbutter49</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/03/27/even-at-a-devalued-position-richardsons-talent-too-great-to-pass-up/#comment-1684802</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[hmbutter49]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2012 07:44:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=435149#comment-1684802</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@thcnote
he also won&#039;t be the best player on the team and lead them to an nfc title game like peterson and be the primary reason his team HAS a chance at the super bowl]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@thcnote<br />
he also won&#8217;t be the best player on the team and lead them to an nfc title game like peterson and be the primary reason his team HAS a chance at the super bowl</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shadylamp</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/03/27/even-at-a-devalued-position-richardsons-talent-too-great-to-pass-up/#comment-1684712</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[shadylamp]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2012 04:24:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=435149#comment-1684712</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#039;s so obvious what Heckert is doing here. He really wants a trade down with Miami. Miami really wants Tannehill. They really played their hand by pursuing Manning and Flynn so hard. This is a brilliant move by the Browns brass.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s so obvious what Heckert is doing here. He really wants a trade down with Miami. Miami really wants Tannehill. They really played their hand by pursuing Manning and Flynn so hard. This is a brilliant move by the Browns brass.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bouchez9393</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/03/27/even-at-a-devalued-position-richardsons-talent-too-great-to-pass-up/#comment-1684655</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[bouchez9393]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2012 03:40:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=435149#comment-1684655</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[T Rich is the man, the bucs have the o line , the receivers and a qb, let Blount pound the ball and use Trent as out of the backfield option, or just pitch it to him and watch him run 20 yards, this is the guy they need to solidify their offense. They spent the first 2 rounds of the draft in the last 2 years making sure their defense will be great in the future, so this draft pick should be the final piece of the puzzle!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>T Rich is the man, the bucs have the o line , the receivers and a qb, let Blount pound the ball and use Trent as out of the backfield option, or just pitch it to him and watch him run 20 yards, this is the guy they need to solidify their offense. They spent the first 2 rounds of the draft in the last 2 years making sure their defense will be great in the future, so this draft pick should be the final piece of the puzzle!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: grimreeper</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/03/27/even-at-a-devalued-position-richardsons-talent-too-great-to-pass-up/#comment-1684185</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[grimreeper]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2012 23:59:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=435149#comment-1684185</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sorry I love this guy if I were picking first in the draft he would be my first pick. Remember once you have the lead you need a pounder and someone who might break one so guess what he can be that back]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry I love this guy if I were picking first in the draft he would be my first pick. Remember once you have the lead you need a pounder and someone who might break one so guess what he can be that back</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: teamobijuan</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/03/27/even-at-a-devalued-position-richardsons-talent-too-great-to-pass-up/#comment-1683864</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[teamobijuan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2012 21:38:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=435149#comment-1683864</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Adrian Peterson is one of the best ever, but who knows how he&#039;ll be after the surgery?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Adrian Peterson is one of the best ever, but who knows how he&#8217;ll be after the surgery?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eachdayisbetterthanthenext</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/03/27/even-at-a-devalued-position-richardsons-talent-too-great-to-pass-up/#comment-1683757</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[eachdayisbetterthanthenext]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2012 21:03:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=435149#comment-1683757</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[omegalh says: Mar 27, 2012 12:25 PM 

Name the last time a top-flight RB won the super bowl. Nuff said.


How about Jerome Bettis?
How about Marshall Faulk?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>omegalh says: Mar 27, 2012 12:25 PM </p>
<p>Name the last time a top-flight RB won the super bowl. Nuff said.</p>
<p>How about Jerome Bettis?<br />
How about Marshall Faulk?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: southpaw2k</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/03/27/even-at-a-devalued-position-richardsons-talent-too-great-to-pass-up/#comment-1683698</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[southpaw2k]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2012 20:45:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=435149#comment-1683698</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[dv5454 says: 
Mar 27, 2012 1:05 PM 
Name the last team that won a Super Bowl because it had a world class running back. . . Walter Payton in 85? 

Winning in the NFL is all about quarterbacks and controlling the line of scrimmage.

-------------------------------------------------

I agree with your second sentence, but I&#039;d say Marshall Faulk in &#039;99 sinks your first argument.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>dv5454 says:<br />
Mar 27, 2012 1:05 PM<br />
Name the last team that won a Super Bowl because it had a world class running back. . . Walter Payton in 85? </p>
<p>Winning in the NFL is all about quarterbacks and controlling the line of scrimmage.</p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-</p>
<p>I agree with your second sentence, but I&#8217;d say Marshall Faulk in &#8217;99 sinks your first argument.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: benpatterson85</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/03/27/even-at-a-devalued-position-richardsons-talent-too-great-to-pass-up/#comment-1683659</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[benpatterson85]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2012 20:37:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=435149#comment-1683659</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[marshawnlynchlookslikepredator says: Mar 27, 2012 12:57 PM

The Raiders went belly up without McFadden. It’s all about the offense you run whether a top flight RB is necessary. If you don’t have a top tier QB, then RBs become much more important.



The Raiders didnt go belly up with out McFadden they went belly up as soon as Campbell went down and they you traded for a couch potato qb in Palmer not to say he will not be good this year but last year the guy sat for what 6 weeks at home and then the raiders threw him in there without being able to gel with the team not the best idea]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>marshawnlynchlookslikepredator says: Mar 27, 2012 12:57 PM</p>
<p>The Raiders went belly up without McFadden. It’s all about the offense you run whether a top flight RB is necessary. If you don’t have a top tier QB, then RBs become much more important.</p>
<p>The Raiders didnt go belly up with out McFadden they went belly up as soon as Campbell went down and they you traded for a couch potato qb in Palmer not to say he will not be good this year but last year the guy sat for what 6 weeks at home and then the raiders threw him in there without being able to gel with the team not the best idea</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: benpatterson85</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/03/27/even-at-a-devalued-position-richardsons-talent-too-great-to-pass-up/#comment-1683639</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[benpatterson85]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2012 20:33:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=435149#comment-1683639</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I am a diehard Bucs fan have been my whole life and i have been on the Claiborne bandwagon but I have been watching a lot of Richardsons tape recently and I have to say that I hope the Bucs are able to pick him at 5. The guy is going to be a beast he has it all from break away speed to blocking and catching out of the back field he can do it all I love Blount he is a beast as well but he could learn a thing or 2 from Richardson and I think that 1-2 punch would be one of the best in the league I just hope he comes to Tampa with our O-line and with Freeman to Jackson we can be right up there with the best in the league as soon as this team gels and get used to one another we are going to be an offense you have to fear in the next few years LETS GO BUCS!!!!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am a diehard Bucs fan have been my whole life and i have been on the Claiborne bandwagon but I have been watching a lot of Richardsons tape recently and I have to say that I hope the Bucs are able to pick him at 5. The guy is going to be a beast he has it all from break away speed to blocking and catching out of the back field he can do it all I love Blount he is a beast as well but he could learn a thing or 2 from Richardson and I think that 1-2 punch would be one of the best in the league I just hope he comes to Tampa with our O-line and with Freeman to Jackson we can be right up there with the best in the league as soon as this team gels and get used to one another we are going to be an offense you have to fear in the next few years LETS GO BUCS!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: realitypolice</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/03/27/even-at-a-devalued-position-richardsons-talent-too-great-to-pass-up/#comment-1683638</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[realitypolice]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2012 20:33:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=435149#comment-1683638</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@dawgtown86:

Every back on that list, with the possible exception of LDT, played in a profoundly different era of NFL football where the RB was the focal point of the offense.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@dawgtown86:</p>
<p>Every back on that list, with the possible exception of LDT, played in a profoundly different era of NFL football where the RB was the focal point of the offense.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Deb</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/03/27/even-at-a-devalued-position-richardsons-talent-too-great-to-pass-up/#comment-1683633</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Deb]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2012 20:32:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=435149#comment-1683633</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As a Bama fan I can tell you guys, Richardson was not overrated. I adore Mark Ingram--who walked away from the Tide with a Heisman--and Trent may be even better. The guy is a beast. I&#039;d give anything if the Steelers had a chance at him.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a Bama fan I can tell you guys, Richardson was not overrated. I adore Mark Ingram&#8211;who walked away from the Tide with a Heisman&#8211;and Trent may be even better. The guy is a beast. I&#8217;d give anything if the Steelers had a chance at him.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: schmitty2</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/03/27/even-at-a-devalued-position-richardsons-talent-too-great-to-pass-up/#comment-1683551</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[schmitty2]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2012 20:07:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=435149#comment-1683551</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[avanderlay says: Mar 27, 2012 12:50 PM 
Sorry, but despite this rosy write-up this guy does not wow me at all. Blount is a VERY solid starter IMO and the Bucs just need to draft some depth behind him in the later rounds. 

Hoping Claiborne is there for the Bucs




VERY solid starter?? The guy was yanked at the end of the season for fumbling problems. Can&#039;t catch passes out of the backfield and average blocker at best]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>avanderlay says: Mar 27, 2012 12:50 PM<br />
Sorry, but despite this rosy write-up this guy does not wow me at all. Blount is a VERY solid starter IMO and the Bucs just need to draft some depth behind him in the later rounds. </p>
<p>Hoping Claiborne is there for the Bucs</p>
<p>VERY solid starter?? The guy was yanked at the end of the season for fumbling problems. Can&#8217;t catch passes out of the backfield and average blocker at best</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: osage44</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/03/27/even-at-a-devalued-position-richardsons-talent-too-great-to-pass-up/#comment-1683513</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[osage44]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2012 20:00:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=435149#comment-1683513</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mayock likes to hear himself talk, doesn&#039;t he? Anyway, Richardson is the most overrated player in this draft class. He just is. Any team who takes him in the top 10 is being run by a fool.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mayock likes to hear himself talk, doesn&#8217;t he? Anyway, Richardson is the most overrated player in this draft class. He just is. Any team who takes him in the top 10 is being run by a fool.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: buffsoup</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/03/27/even-at-a-devalued-position-richardsons-talent-too-great-to-pass-up/#comment-1683497</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[buffsoup]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2012 19:55:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=435149#comment-1683497</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Really...  I think TR is a great talent, but I wonder how much it costs now to get a top 10 endoresement from Mayock.  This is joke.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Really&#8230;  I think TR is a great talent, but I wonder how much it costs now to get a top 10 endoresement from Mayock.  This is joke.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: armeniandelight4</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/03/27/even-at-a-devalued-position-richardsons-talent-too-great-to-pass-up/#comment-1683480</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[armeniandelight4]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2012 19:49:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=435149#comment-1683480</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[They should bring back Mike Alstott to block for him.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They should bring back Mike Alstott to block for him.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dawgtown86</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/03/27/even-at-a-devalued-position-richardsons-talent-too-great-to-pass-up/#comment-1683408</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[dawgtown86]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2012 19:23:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=435149#comment-1683408</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There are currently some great running backs taken in later rounds (and time will tell how they stack up) but historically the all-time greats have been first rounders: 

Round 1, Pick #1 - Earl Campbell
Round 1, Pick #1 - OJ Simpson
Round 1, Pick #2 - Eric Dickerson
Round 1, Pick #2 - Marshall Faulk
Round 1, Pick #2 - Tony Dorsett
Round 1, Pick #3 - Barry Sanders
Round 1, Pick #4 - Walter Payton
Round 1, Pick #4 - Gale Sayers
Round 1, Pick #5 - LaDainian Tomlinson
Round 1, Pick #6 - Jim Brown
Round 1, Pick #7 - Adrian Peterson
Round 1, Pick #8 - Larry Czonka
Round 1, Pick #10 - Marcus Allen
Round 1, Pick #10 - Jerome Bettis
Round 1, Pick #17 - Emmit Smith]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are currently some great running backs taken in later rounds (and time will tell how they stack up) but historically the all-time greats have been first rounders: </p>
<p>Round 1, Pick #1 &#8211; Earl Campbell<br />
Round 1, Pick #1 &#8211; OJ Simpson<br />
Round 1, Pick #2 &#8211; Eric Dickerson<br />
Round 1, Pick #2 &#8211; Marshall Faulk<br />
Round 1, Pick #2 &#8211; Tony Dorsett<br />
Round 1, Pick #3 &#8211; Barry Sanders<br />
Round 1, Pick #4 &#8211; Walter Payton<br />
Round 1, Pick #4 &#8211; Gale Sayers<br />
Round 1, Pick #5 &#8211; LaDainian Tomlinson<br />
Round 1, Pick #6 &#8211; Jim Brown<br />
Round 1, Pick #7 &#8211; Adrian Peterson<br />
Round 1, Pick #8 &#8211; Larry Czonka<br />
Round 1, Pick #10 &#8211; Marcus Allen<br />
Round 1, Pick #10 &#8211; Jerome Bettis<br />
Round 1, Pick #17 &#8211; Emmit Smith</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: steelcityrapist</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/03/27/even-at-a-devalued-position-richardsons-talent-too-great-to-pass-up/#comment-1683386</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[steelcityrapist]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2012 19:14:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=435149#comment-1683386</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Why use a top pick on a RB when you can get one for cheap in free agency and draft a WR.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why use a top pick on a RB when you can get one for cheap in free agency and draft a WR.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dasmol</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/03/27/even-at-a-devalued-position-richardsons-talent-too-great-to-pass-up/#comment-1683345</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[dasmol]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2012 18:55:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=435149#comment-1683345</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Personally, I think that Running Backs are a dime a dozen. You want a good RB, have a good offensive line.

That said, you don&#039;t pass up on an elite RB. They are game changers, game managers and defensive nightmares. They make all the other offensive weapons better. 

If this Richardson kid is as good as advertised, teams in need of a RB, or star player, shouldn&#039;t think twice about taking him in the first.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Personally, I think that Running Backs are a dime a dozen. You want a good RB, have a good offensive line.</p>
<p>That said, you don&#8217;t pass up on an elite RB. They are game changers, game managers and defensive nightmares. They make all the other offensive weapons better. </p>
<p>If this Richardson kid is as good as advertised, teams in need of a RB, or star player, shouldn&#8217;t think twice about taking him in the first.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bucwild05</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/03/27/even-at-a-devalued-position-richardsons-talent-too-great-to-pass-up/#comment-1683325</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[bucwild05]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2012 18:51:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=435149#comment-1683325</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After reading all these comments, you should all be coaching, you&#039;re so smart.  Is Richardson worth a top 5 pick?  That&#039;s up to the team that drafts him, and what their game plan is.  If they have a Tom Brady who is an elite QB, they will rely on passing more than running, so maybe not as important.

If your Defense sucks, really bad, then maybe you need to hang onto the ball longer, so you&#039;ll run the ball.

Remember &quot;the greatest show on turf&quot;?  Elite RB and QB.  The Rams were talked about constantly, and won the Superbowl.  The relied on the offense to win the SB.... So... Depending on the Teams wants and Needs, they&#039;ll make the decision based on that.  Sure, TB needs a CB, and Claiborne would be awesome, however, if they want to blow up the offense, then they will go for Richardson.... It&#039;s what the team wants, and not all you fans that think you know it all sitting on the couch.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After reading all these comments, you should all be coaching, you&#8217;re so smart.  Is Richardson worth a top 5 pick?  That&#8217;s up to the team that drafts him, and what their game plan is.  If they have a Tom Brady who is an elite QB, they will rely on passing more than running, so maybe not as important.</p>
<p>If your Defense sucks, really bad, then maybe you need to hang onto the ball longer, so you&#8217;ll run the ball.</p>
<p>Remember &#8220;the greatest show on turf&#8221;?  Elite RB and QB.  The Rams were talked about constantly, and won the Superbowl.  The relied on the offense to win the SB&#8230;. So&#8230; Depending on the Teams wants and Needs, they&#8217;ll make the decision based on that.  Sure, TB needs a CB, and Claiborne would be awesome, however, if they want to blow up the offense, then they will go for Richardson&#8230;. It&#8217;s what the team wants, and not all you fans that think you know it all sitting on the couch.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shackdelrio</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/03/27/even-at-a-devalued-position-richardsons-talent-too-great-to-pass-up/#comment-1683298</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[shackdelrio]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2012 18:41:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=435149#comment-1683298</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mike Mayock is Lady Gaga to Mel Kiper&#039;s Madonna.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mike Mayock is Lady Gaga to Mel Kiper&#8217;s Madonna.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jackshine</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/03/27/even-at-a-devalued-position-richardsons-talent-too-great-to-pass-up/#comment-1683275</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jackshine]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2012 18:34:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=435149#comment-1683275</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[4. CLE- Morris Claiborne 

 5. TB- Something Crazy. (I think Schiano is the next Belichick style drafter, will he be closer to BB or Josh McD?) 

 6. STL- Blackmon (They pick up 3 1st rounders and still get their mam.&quot; 

 7. JAX- When this pick comes up I just hope its not a player I like in the draft, for obvious reasons.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>4. CLE- Morris Claiborne </p>
<p> 5. TB- Something Crazy. (I think Schiano is the next Belichick style drafter, will he be closer to BB or Josh McD?) </p>
<p> 6. STL- Blackmon (They pick up 3 1st rounders and still get their mam.&#8221; </p>
<p> 7. JAX- When this pick comes up I just hope its not a player I like in the draft, for obvious reasons.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: emperorzero</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/03/27/even-at-a-devalued-position-richardsons-talent-too-great-to-pass-up/#comment-1683253</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[emperorzero]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2012 18:29:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=435149#comment-1683253</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think one of the things that gets forgotten about Richardson is that he was the best back in Alabama the year Ingram won the Heisman. Ingram got the press, but Richardson was much more explosive and had the bigger plays.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think one of the things that gets forgotten about Richardson is that he was the best back in Alabama the year Ingram won the Heisman. Ingram got the press, but Richardson was much more explosive and had the bigger plays.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ademell1</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/03/27/even-at-a-devalued-position-richardsons-talent-too-great-to-pass-up/#comment-1683186</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ademell1]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2012 18:07:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=435149#comment-1683186</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Browns HAVE to get Richardson at 4.

Wait for Weeden at #22, or trade down a bit more.

Weeden would be a great challenge for McCoy. He&#039;s a a couple years under 30, he knows he has to come in and pretty much start for a team.

Weeden will push McCoy or (likely) beat him out for the job, and with Richardson helping them out, they&#039;ll both have less pressure on em&#039;.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Browns HAVE to get Richardson at 4.</p>
<p>Wait for Weeden at #22, or trade down a bit more.</p>
<p>Weeden would be a great challenge for McCoy. He&#8217;s a a couple years under 30, he knows he has to come in and pretty much start for a team.</p>
<p>Weeden will push McCoy or (likely) beat him out for the job, and with Richardson helping them out, they&#8217;ll both have less pressure on em&#8217;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joey8888</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/03/27/even-at-a-devalued-position-richardsons-talent-too-great-to-pass-up/#comment-1683183</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[joey8888]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2012 18:06:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=435149#comment-1683183</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;I still don’t understand this “devalued” stuff. It’s not like the committee approach is perfect — and it’s the same 6 or 7 guys that show, every year, they’re playing on a different level than everyone else. AP, Ray Rice, Arian Foster, those breakout games DeMarco Murray had, LeSean McCoy, even guys like Forte that haven’t been able to put up the stats…why a team isn’t spending the extra $2-3M/year for a player at a crucial position that can dominate — or break open — a game for you, I don’t get. &quot;  uh, buddy, you just defeated your own point; how many first rounders do you see among Rice, FOster and Murray. Any GM who uses a top 10 on a running back should be fired as he&#039;s handing in the card]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I still don’t understand this “devalued” stuff. It’s not like the committee approach is perfect — and it’s the same 6 or 7 guys that show, every year, they’re playing on a different level than everyone else. AP, Ray Rice, Arian Foster, those breakout games DeMarco Murray had, LeSean McCoy, even guys like Forte that haven’t been able to put up the stats…why a team isn’t spending the extra $2-3M/year for a player at a crucial position that can dominate — or break open — a game for you, I don’t get. &#8221;  uh, buddy, you just defeated your own point; how many first rounders do you see among Rice, FOster and Murray. Any GM who uses a top 10 on a running back should be fired as he&#8217;s handing in the card</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: piemasteruk</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/03/27/even-at-a-devalued-position-richardsons-talent-too-great-to-pass-up/#comment-1683126</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[piemasteruk]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2012 17:52:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=435149#comment-1683126</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The fact that RBs are devalued has nothing to do with the league becoming a passing league.  It&#039;s just the slow realisation that:

1.  The difference between a good RB and an average one (all other things, such as scheme and protection, being equal) is just not that great.

2.  The old idea of a &#039;feature back&#039; is going out of vogue, with a committee of 2-3 RBs staying fresher and able to step in in case of injury proving more effective.

3.  RBs just don&#039;t have a long shelf life.  They probably have 3-4 years of heavy use, then they are often ready for the knackers yard and one bad injury (which they are especially prone to) can shorten this even further.  Why would you give an RB a big signing bonus and multi-year contract when 2 years later you might have to release him?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The fact that RBs are devalued has nothing to do with the league becoming a passing league.  It&#8217;s just the slow realisation that:</p>
<p>1.  The difference between a good RB and an average one (all other things, such as scheme and protection, being equal) is just not that great.</p>
<p>2.  The old idea of a &#8216;feature back&#8217; is going out of vogue, with a committee of 2-3 RBs staying fresher and able to step in in case of injury proving more effective.</p>
<p>3.  RBs just don&#8217;t have a long shelf life.  They probably have 3-4 years of heavy use, then they are often ready for the knackers yard and one bad injury (which they are especially prone to) can shorten this even further.  Why would you give an RB a big signing bonus and multi-year contract when 2 years later you might have to release him?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dexterismyhero</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/03/27/even-at-a-devalued-position-richardsons-talent-too-great-to-pass-up/#comment-1683101</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[dexterismyhero]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2012 17:48:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=435149#comment-1683101</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@Manbearpig says:Mar 27, 2012 12:43 PM 

2009 Super Bowl Champions – New Orleans Saints*
=================================

2005 Hurricane Champions--NOLA]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Manbearpig says:Mar 27, 2012 12:43 PM </p>
<p>2009 Super Bowl Champions – New Orleans Saints*<br />
=================================</p>
<p>2005 Hurricane Champions&#8211;NOLA</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jwreck</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/03/27/even-at-a-devalued-position-richardsons-talent-too-great-to-pass-up/#comment-1683095</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jwreck]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2012 17:47:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=435149#comment-1683095</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[KIR -- Good point, well-written paragraph, god-awful list.  Aside from the points others have made about your listed backs&#039; draft postions, you asked about which of these backs could have been replaced.  The answer: most of them.

KIR says: Mar 27, 2012 12:28 PM 
[...]

PLAYOFFS
Arian Foster, HOU-- Ok, I&#039;ll give you that one

Frank Gore, SF -- That one too

Ray Rice, BAL-- Three for three so far.

Michael Turner, ATL-- After a downer year, Turner was a big help in Atlanta&#039;s offense scoring not a single point in their playoff game.  I give him one more year in the ATL, his career is coming to a close.

Cedric Benson, CIN -- First off: Benson is awful.  You ask how they could possibly replace him?  They already have, with Benjarvus Green-Ellis.  Though the Law Firm is a solid back, he is not a game changer or even a playmaker, he&#039;s sturdy, reliable, and unspectacular.  According to the Bengals, those three attributes make him a significant upgrade over Benson. 

Rashard Mendenhall, PIT  --  Literally was replaced.  Mendenhall, who was not especially impressive early in 2011, was already being worked out of the lineup by Isaac Redman when he tore his ACL in week 15.   It has been speculated that he may not have much of a future in Pittsburgh.

Darren Sproles, NO -- Not only can Sproles be easily replaced, he is, in fact, a replacement.  Though there&#039;s no denying Sproles had a great season in 2011.  However, he is not, and has never been, a back who can carry the load for his whole team.  Though he is a playmaker and can break a game open on any given play, Mark Ingram was New Orleans intended primary running back, and Sproles just stepped up to fill a void when Ingram went down for the season.  Do not expect Sproles to have anywhere near the same number of touches next year.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>KIR &#8212; Good point, well-written paragraph, god-awful list.  Aside from the points others have made about your listed backs&#8217; draft postions, you asked about which of these backs could have been replaced.  The answer: most of them.</p>
<p>KIR says: Mar 27, 2012 12:28 PM<br />
[...]</p>
<p>PLAYOFFS<br />
Arian Foster, HOU&#8211; Ok, I&#8217;ll give you that one</p>
<p>Frank Gore, SF &#8212; That one too</p>
<p>Ray Rice, BAL&#8211; Three for three so far.</p>
<p>Michael Turner, ATL&#8211; After a downer year, Turner was a big help in Atlanta&#8217;s offense scoring not a single point in their playoff game.  I give him one more year in the ATL, his career is coming to a close.</p>
<p>Cedric Benson, CIN &#8212; First off: Benson is awful.  You ask how they could possibly replace him?  They already have, with Benjarvus Green-Ellis.  Though the Law Firm is a solid back, he is not a game changer or even a playmaker, he&#8217;s sturdy, reliable, and unspectacular.  According to the Bengals, those three attributes make him a significant upgrade over Benson. </p>
<p>Rashard Mendenhall, PIT  &#8212;  Literally was replaced.  Mendenhall, who was not especially impressive early in 2011, was already being worked out of the lineup by Isaac Redman when he tore his ACL in week 15.   It has been speculated that he may not have much of a future in Pittsburgh.</p>
<p>Darren Sproles, NO &#8212; Not only can Sproles be easily replaced, he is, in fact, a replacement.  Though there&#8217;s no denying Sproles had a great season in 2011.  However, he is not, and has never been, a back who can carry the load for his whole team.  Though he is a playmaker and can break a game open on any given play, Mark Ingram was New Orleans intended primary running back, and Sproles just stepped up to fill a void when Ingram went down for the season.  Do not expect Sproles to have anywhere near the same number of touches next year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thehouseofho</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/03/27/even-at-a-devalued-position-richardsons-talent-too-great-to-pass-up/#comment-1683066</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[thehouseofho]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2012 17:40:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=435149#comment-1683066</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[braven4evr says:
Mar 27, 2012 12:30 PM
@ thraiderskin

The last time I looked Ray Rice was a running back also. In fact he’s a very good one at that!

----------

Ray Rice wasn&#039;t a top 10 pick.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>braven4evr says:<br />
Mar 27, 2012 12:30 PM<br />
@ thraiderskin</p>
<p>The last time I looked Ray Rice was a running back also. In fact he’s a very good one at that!</p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-</p>
<p>Ray Rice wasn&#8217;t a top 10 pick.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: davidjcu</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/03/27/even-at-a-devalued-position-richardsons-talent-too-great-to-pass-up/#comment-1683065</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[davidjcu]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2012 17:40:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=435149#comment-1683065</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So the Texans would of made it to the playoffs with the arm of their 3rd string QB and not having a elite rushing attack. Look how the Bears crumbled without Matt Forte, the Chiefs without Charles, and Raiders without McFadden. How terrible the Ravens would of been without Ray Rice.  These guys aren&#039;t going to get the mega contracts but you they aren&#039;t a dime a dozen.  The days of RBs getting huge long term deals with big signing bonuses is over.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So the Texans would of made it to the playoffs with the arm of their 3rd string QB and not having a elite rushing attack. Look how the Bears crumbled without Matt Forte, the Chiefs without Charles, and Raiders without McFadden. How terrible the Ravens would of been without Ray Rice.  These guys aren&#8217;t going to get the mega contracts but you they aren&#8217;t a dime a dozen.  The days of RBs getting huge long term deals with big signing bonuses is over.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
