<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Vikings wanted Pierre Garçon, but not for what Redskins paid</title>
	<atom:link href="http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/03/27/vikings-wanted-pierre-garcon-but-not-for-what-redskins-paid/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/03/27/vikings-wanted-pierre-garcon-but-not-for-what-redskins-paid/</link>
	<description>ProFootballTalk on NBCSports.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 17:10:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: randomjim</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/03/27/vikings-wanted-pierre-garcon-but-not-for-what-redskins-paid/#comment-1684463</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[randomjim]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2012 02:11:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=435212#comment-1684463</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nobody on here mentioned how quick he signed with Wash. That was pretty quick work, no tampering here was there?????]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nobody on here mentioned how quick he signed with Wash. That was pretty quick work, no tampering here was there?????</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: brobokil</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/03/27/vikings-wanted-pierre-garcon-but-not-for-what-redskins-paid/#comment-1684182</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[brobokil]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2012 23:58:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=435212#comment-1684182</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Also, forgot to mention how vulnerable Pierre Garcon has been to injury, and has never been a star reciever. You don&#039;t pay star reciever money to a guy who when he isn&#039;t hurt only performs at average. Carlson was 5 mil a year. Pretty standard.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also, forgot to mention how vulnerable Pierre Garcon has been to injury, and has never been a star reciever. You don&#8217;t pay star reciever money to a guy who when he isn&#8217;t hurt only performs at average. Carlson was 5 mil a year. Pretty standard.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: brobokil</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/03/27/vikings-wanted-pierre-garcon-but-not-for-what-redskins-paid/#comment-1684164</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[brobokil]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2012 23:51:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=435212#comment-1684164</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Everyone is hating on this Carlson move. Anyone whose had him over the last couple of years in fantasy would know he was THE best scoring tight end until hurt. He was cheaper than Shank, and the Vikings offense FEATURES multiple tight ends. Our offense is designed to be short concervative passing. Carlson makes as much sense for the Vikings as any other position, and I can&#039;t wait to see him play.

Also, the Redskins have created their own image as overspenders on underachievers for at least a few years now. Need I mention Albert Hayneworth again? The skins do not know how to build a team, they just keep overpaying for busts every year.

Spielman is finally rebuilding the Vikings and putting them back on the UPswing (every team cycles from good to bad over and over, it&#039;s how football works). 

If you don&#039;t agree with Spielman, you basically don&#039;t know what you&#039;re talking about.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Everyone is hating on this Carlson move. Anyone whose had him over the last couple of years in fantasy would know he was THE best scoring tight end until hurt. He was cheaper than Shank, and the Vikings offense FEATURES multiple tight ends. Our offense is designed to be short concervative passing. Carlson makes as much sense for the Vikings as any other position, and I can&#8217;t wait to see him play.</p>
<p>Also, the Redskins have created their own image as overspenders on underachievers for at least a few years now. Need I mention Albert Hayneworth again? The skins do not know how to build a team, they just keep overpaying for busts every year.</p>
<p>Spielman is finally rebuilding the Vikings and putting them back on the UPswing (every team cycles from good to bad over and over, it&#8217;s how football works). </p>
<p>If you don&#8217;t agree with Spielman, you basically don&#8217;t know what you&#8217;re talking about.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gb4mn0</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/03/27/vikings-wanted-pierre-garcon-but-not-for-what-redskins-paid/#comment-1684078</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[gb4mn0]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2012 23:22:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=435212#comment-1684078</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[thraiderskin says: 
Mar 27, 2012 1:16 PM 
Wait… so the Redskins are stupid for signing Garcon big time money (of course he has had big time games) but paying that much money for a second pass-catching tight end, coming off a season ending injury, is the genius decision?

------------------------------------------

Obviously! That&#039;s why they have so many Lombardi&#039;s in MN..............hahahahahaha!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thraiderskin says:<br />
Mar 27, 2012 1:16 PM<br />
Wait… so the Redskins are stupid for signing Garcon big time money (of course he has had big time games) but paying that much money for a second pass-catching tight end, coming off a season ending injury, is the genius decision?</p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;</p>
<p>Obviously! That&#8217;s why they have so many Lombardi&#8217;s in MN&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;..hahahahahaha!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: youallrfools</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/03/27/vikings-wanted-pierre-garcon-but-not-for-what-redskins-paid/#comment-1684073</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[youallrfools]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2012 23:21:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=435212#comment-1684073</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Fantasy Noise says:Mar 27, 2012 1:01 PM 

Michael Floyd is better than Garcon already. Trade some later picks to get back into the 1st round. Kalil and Floyd would be some real nice players to come out of this draft with.
--------------------------------------------------------
I could hope for nothing more.  It&#039;s too bad that the Vikings seem smitten with the idea of trading back, not up. 

I would rather take a shot on Floyd then soooo much risk on Blackmon.  Kalil is a major position of need and lowest risk.  If Blackmon is a bust, the draft is basically a bust (see Lions), but if we trade a bit to move on Floyd all he has to do is be serviceable and we can justify it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fantasy Noise says:Mar 27, 2012 1:01 PM </p>
<p>Michael Floyd is better than Garcon already. Trade some later picks to get back into the 1st round. Kalil and Floyd would be some real nice players to come out of this draft with.<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;<br />
I could hope for nothing more.  It&#8217;s too bad that the Vikings seem smitten with the idea of trading back, not up. </p>
<p>I would rather take a shot on Floyd then soooo much risk on Blackmon.  Kalil is a major position of need and lowest risk.  If Blackmon is a bust, the draft is basically a bust (see Lions), but if we trade a bit to move on Floyd all he has to do is be serviceable and we can justify it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bagadeez04</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/03/27/vikings-wanted-pierre-garcon-but-not-for-what-redskins-paid/#comment-1683821</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[bagadeez04]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2012 21:21:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=435212#comment-1683821</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Typical Redskins...wayyyyyyyyyyyyy overpaying for a moderately talented player. 

Only a couple teams in the league that would give a guy like Garcon that kind of money...and I think the Raiders are under new leadership so make that one team.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Typical Redskins&#8230;wayyyyyyyyyyyyy overpaying for a moderately talented player. </p>
<p>Only a couple teams in the league that would give a guy like Garcon that kind of money&#8230;and I think the Raiders are under new leadership so make that one team.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: k0mbucha</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/03/27/vikings-wanted-pierre-garcon-but-not-for-what-redskins-paid/#comment-1683779</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[k0mbucha]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2012 21:09:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=435212#comment-1683779</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[footballfanman says: Mar 27, 2012 4:35 PM

theyknowtheyknowtheyknow said:
Garçon was the 28th ranked WR last year…no where close to top 5.

Jabar Gaffbey and Heyward-bey had similar years in production….would you have given them 21.5 m guaranteed?
____________________________________

It’s how Garcon got those numbers though, he was top 5 in YAC which means he got a lot of his yards after contact, something Washington desperately needed in a WR.

-------------------------------------------------

Thank you footballfanman , it&#039;s obvious  he missed that I mentioned YAC.  All Redskins had zero YAC and zero td catches outside of the redzone last season which is why the offense constantly stalled, and difficulty putting up points.

Basically Garcon` contract is only $13.1 million in fully guaranteed money, via the $11 million signing bonus he received and only $2.1mil base for the 2012 season. So for those that refused to actyally take the time to read the actuall contract breakdown and think this is the same ole Vinny Cerrato Redskins you&#039;re just simply out of touch...lol]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>footballfanman says: Mar 27, 2012 4:35 PM</p>
<p>theyknowtheyknowtheyknow said:<br />
Garçon was the 28th ranked WR last year…no where close to top 5.</p>
<p>Jabar Gaffbey and Heyward-bey had similar years in production….would you have given them 21.5 m guaranteed?<br />
____________________________________</p>
<p>It’s how Garcon got those numbers though, he was top 5 in YAC which means he got a lot of his yards after contact, something Washington desperately needed in a WR.</p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-</p>
<p>Thank you footballfanman , it&#8217;s obvious  he missed that I mentioned YAC.  All Redskins had zero YAC and zero td catches outside of the redzone last season which is why the offense constantly stalled, and difficulty putting up points.</p>
<p>Basically Garcon` contract is only $13.1 million in fully guaranteed money, via the $11 million signing bonus he received and only $2.1mil base for the 2012 season. So for those that refused to actyally take the time to read the actuall contract breakdown and think this is the same ole Vinny Cerrato Redskins you&#8217;re just simply out of touch&#8230;lol</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: footballfanman</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/03/27/vikings-wanted-pierre-garcon-but-not-for-what-redskins-paid/#comment-1683648</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[footballfanman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2012 20:35:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=435212#comment-1683648</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[theyknowtheyknowtheyknow said:
Garçon was the 28th ranked WR last year…no where close to top 5.

Jabar Gaffbey and Heyward-bey had similar years in production….would you have given them 21.5 m guaranteed?
____________________________________

It&#039;s how Garcon got those numbers though, he was top 5 in YAC which means he got a lot of his yards after contact, something Washington desperately needed in a WR.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>theyknowtheyknowtheyknow said:<br />
Garçon was the 28th ranked WR last year…no where close to top 5.</p>
<p>Jabar Gaffbey and Heyward-bey had similar years in production….would you have given them 21.5 m guaranteed?<br />
____________________________________</p>
<p>It&#8217;s how Garcon got those numbers though, he was top 5 in YAC which means he got a lot of his yards after contact, something Washington desperately needed in a WR.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tarken10</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/03/27/vikings-wanted-pierre-garcon-but-not-for-what-redskins-paid/#comment-1683403</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[tarken10]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2012 19:21:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=435212#comment-1683403</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Vikings learned their lesson by overpaying Berrian. Garcon is just not worth what the Redskins are now paying him.

Smart move to back out.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Vikings learned their lesson by overpaying Berrian. Garcon is just not worth what the Redskins are now paying him.</p>
<p>Smart move to back out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: smakhhm</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/03/27/vikings-wanted-pierre-garcon-but-not-for-what-redskins-paid/#comment-1683321</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[smakhhm]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2012 18:49:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=435212#comment-1683321</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[patsaintsbroncoscheat says:
Mar 27, 2012 1:41 PM
I love how the Skins try to buy the superbowl every year. Additionally every year they get more and more pathetic. It is getting to the point where we should consider asking the arena league if they will take one more team.




Don&#039;t you have some Quarterback to injure somewhere Saints fan? People in glass houses shouldn&#039;t throw stones.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>patsaintsbroncoscheat says:<br />
Mar 27, 2012 1:41 PM<br />
I love how the Skins try to buy the superbowl every year. Additionally every year they get more and more pathetic. It is getting to the point where we should consider asking the arena league if they will take one more team.</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t you have some Quarterback to injure somewhere Saints fan? People in glass houses shouldn&#8217;t throw stones.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: marksp18</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/03/27/vikings-wanted-pierre-garcon-but-not-for-what-redskins-paid/#comment-1683282</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[marksp18]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2012 18:36:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=435212#comment-1683282</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Interesting that none of my fellow Vikings fans are suspicious about the timing of this news.  The team has not done anything to excite the fan base and people are asking questions about their actual plan. 

Obviously, the majority of fans are upset about the lack of even having one top free agent make a visit.  So the team gets this story out through &quot;people in the know&quot; about them willing to get Garcon but only at their price.  

I do not know anything but I ain&#039;t buying this story at all.  I think it is a PR move by the team to try and appease the fans.  In other words, I am throwing the BS flag.  Garcon was not the only player out there.

The Vikings would not pay to get a young experienced pretty good WR.  Well, they will get what they are paying for now.

How ironic is it that this same front office (minus Childress) decided to draft Jaymar Johnson in the 6th round of the 2008 draft instead of Garcon?

Johnson had 88 catches for 1425 yards and 10 TDs at Jackson State.  Garcon had 175 catches for 2972 yards and 41 TDs at Mount Union.

Maybe if the front office would stop trying to be diamonds in the rough type drafters and just be solid drafters they would not be in this position in the first place.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting that none of my fellow Vikings fans are suspicious about the timing of this news.  The team has not done anything to excite the fan base and people are asking questions about their actual plan. </p>
<p>Obviously, the majority of fans are upset about the lack of even having one top free agent make a visit.  So the team gets this story out through &#8220;people in the know&#8221; about them willing to get Garcon but only at their price.  </p>
<p>I do not know anything but I ain&#8217;t buying this story at all.  I think it is a PR move by the team to try and appease the fans.  In other words, I am throwing the BS flag.  Garcon was not the only player out there.</p>
<p>The Vikings would not pay to get a young experienced pretty good WR.  Well, they will get what they are paying for now.</p>
<p>How ironic is it that this same front office (minus Childress) decided to draft Jaymar Johnson in the 6th round of the 2008 draft instead of Garcon?</p>
<p>Johnson had 88 catches for 1425 yards and 10 TDs at Jackson State.  Garcon had 175 catches for 2972 yards and 41 TDs at Mount Union.</p>
<p>Maybe if the front office would stop trying to be diamonds in the rough type drafters and just be solid drafters they would not be in this position in the first place.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: somatg3</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/03/27/vikings-wanted-pierre-garcon-but-not-for-what-redskins-paid/#comment-1683250</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[somatg3]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2012 18:28:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=435212#comment-1683250</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[garcon is the only ufa i was hoping the vikes would sign so its at least comforting knowing spielman/vikes are willing to go after guys but not overspend.  carlson was a good signing and signing henderson, schwartz, bwoman, guion, evans and aromashadu were all solid moves.  draft kalil and pick up at least 2 wr&#039;s and 2 db&#039;s in the first 4 rounds with our 6 picks!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>garcon is the only ufa i was hoping the vikes would sign so its at least comforting knowing spielman/vikes are willing to go after guys but not overspend.  carlson was a good signing and signing henderson, schwartz, bwoman, guion, evans and aromashadu were all solid moves.  draft kalil and pick up at least 2 wr&#8217;s and 2 db&#8217;s in the first 4 rounds with our 6 picks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fancycash34</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/03/27/vikings-wanted-pierre-garcon-but-not-for-what-redskins-paid/#comment-1683225</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[fancycash34]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2012 18:19:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=435212#comment-1683225</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Glad to see us pass on Garcon for that kind of money, I can see where Spielman is going with the signing of Carlson. 

Rudolph/Carlson = Gronk/Hernandez
Percy = Welker
AP &gt; whoever

Draft Kalil to protect Ponders blindside and give him some extra time.  Our Offense will still be based around AP but only time will tell how he&#039;ll recover from his ACL. 

Rudolph and Carlson aren&#039;t on the same level as a Gronk and Hernadez but I can see the Vikes running a similar style offense with these two huge pass catching TE&#039;s. Personally I&#039;d rather have Percy over Welker so I like that. Of course Ponder is no where near Brady but its at least something to try and mimick. Why not try it? It seems to work in NE and the core Vikings are all young. It may take a year or two but I can see it happening down the road.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Glad to see us pass on Garcon for that kind of money, I can see where Spielman is going with the signing of Carlson. </p>
<p>Rudolph/Carlson = Gronk/Hernandez<br />
Percy = Welker<br />
AP &gt; whoever</p>
<p>Draft Kalil to protect Ponders blindside and give him some extra time.  Our Offense will still be based around AP but only time will tell how he&#8217;ll recover from his ACL. </p>
<p>Rudolph and Carlson aren&#8217;t on the same level as a Gronk and Hernadez but I can see the Vikes running a similar style offense with these two huge pass catching TE&#8217;s. Personally I&#8217;d rather have Percy over Welker so I like that. Of course Ponder is no where near Brady but its at least something to try and mimick. Why not try it? It seems to work in NE and the core Vikings are all young. It may take a year or two but I can see it happening down the road.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: khmer379</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/03/27/vikings-wanted-pierre-garcon-but-not-for-what-redskins-paid/#comment-1683220</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[khmer379]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2012 18:17:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=435212#comment-1683220</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have a feeling were gonna draft either Tommy streeter or the St Paul native Micheal Floyd both can strecth the field and are over 6&#039;2 so it a good thing we didnt sign garcone either way am excited about the upcoming draft]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a feeling were gonna draft either Tommy streeter or the St Paul native Micheal Floyd both can strecth the field and are over 6&#8217;2 so it a good thing we didnt sign garcone either way am excited about the upcoming draft</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fwippel</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/03/27/vikings-wanted-pierre-garcon-but-not-for-what-redskins-paid/#comment-1683164</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[fwippel]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2012 18:01:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=435212#comment-1683164</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For once, I actually agree with Rick Spielman in not signing a player.  Garcon is not worth what he&#039;ll be getting from Washington, and the Vikings are better off not pursuing him.

If you&#039;re going to spend that kind of money on a free agent, it needs to be on someone who has consistently produced high-quality results.  Garcon has not.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For once, I actually agree with Rick Spielman in not signing a player.  Garcon is not worth what he&#8217;ll be getting from Washington, and the Vikings are better off not pursuing him.</p>
<p>If you&#8217;re going to spend that kind of money on a free agent, it needs to be on someone who has consistently produced high-quality results.  Garcon has not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: theyknowtheyknowtheyknow</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/03/27/vikings-wanted-pierre-garcon-but-not-for-what-redskins-paid/#comment-1683135</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[theyknowtheyknowtheyknow]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2012 17:54:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=435212#comment-1683135</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Garçon was the 28th ranked WR last year...no where close to top 5.

Jabar Gaffbey and Heyward-bey had similar years in production....would you have given them 21.5 m guaranteed?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Garçon was the 28th ranked WR last year&#8230;no where close to top 5.</p>
<p>Jabar Gaffbey and Heyward-bey had similar years in production&#8230;.would you have given them 21.5 m guaranteed?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ninerdynasty</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/03/27/vikings-wanted-pierre-garcon-but-not-for-what-redskins-paid/#comment-1683130</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ninerdynasty]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2012 17:53:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=435212#comment-1683130</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In other News, The niners wanted to keep Josh Morgan, but not for what the Redskins Paid!   

See the pastern here ?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In other News, The niners wanted to keep Josh Morgan, but not for what the Redskins Paid!   </p>
<p>See the pastern here ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hendawg21</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/03/27/vikings-wanted-pierre-garcon-but-not-for-what-redskins-paid/#comment-1683127</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[hendawg21]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2012 17:53:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=435212#comment-1683127</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When you make the loot  you can spend the loot...that  in itself should explain why a Minnesota can play with a Washington or Dallas it&#039;s just like the Yankees and Red Sox in baseball...if you can&#039;t run with the big dawgs then stay on the porch!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When you make the loot  you can spend the loot&#8230;that  in itself should explain why a Minnesota can play with a Washington or Dallas it&#8217;s just like the Yankees and Red Sox in baseball&#8230;if you can&#8217;t run with the big dawgs then stay on the porch!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: musicman495</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/03/27/vikings-wanted-pierre-garcon-but-not-for-what-redskins-paid/#comment-1683123</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[musicman495]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2012 17:52:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=435212#comment-1683123</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Gee, maybe the Vikings can get the league to penalize the Redskins for outbidding them, and award Garcon and the 2009 Super Bowl trophy to them.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gee, maybe the Vikings can get the league to penalize the Redskins for outbidding them, and award Garcon and the 2009 Super Bowl trophy to them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jpiro</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/03/27/vikings-wanted-pierre-garcon-but-not-for-what-redskins-paid/#comment-1683120</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jpiro]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2012 17:51:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=435212#comment-1683120</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Remember when the Skins overpaid Antwan Randel El? Or when they overpaid Albert Haynesworth?

What about when they overpaid Adam Archuletta? No, don&#039;t remember those?

Don&#039;t worry, just pay attention now and you can still talk about when they overpaid Pierre Garcon.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Remember when the Skins overpaid Antwan Randel El? Or when they overpaid Albert Haynesworth?</p>
<p>What about when they overpaid Adam Archuletta? No, don&#8217;t remember those?</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t worry, just pay attention now and you can still talk about when they overpaid Pierre Garcon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thankheavenfornumberseven</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/03/27/vikings-wanted-pierre-garcon-but-not-for-what-redskins-paid/#comment-1683113</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[thankheavenfornumberseven]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2012 17:50:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=435212#comment-1683113</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If they pay that much for Garcon, they&#039;re hamstrung next year when there might be a free agent they want to overpay for (like one of their own). They may be desperate, but they&#039;re not stupid.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If they pay that much for Garcon, they&#8217;re hamstrung next year when there might be a free agent they want to overpay for (like one of their own). They may be desperate, but they&#8217;re not stupid.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: conormacleod</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/03/27/vikings-wanted-pierre-garcon-but-not-for-what-redskins-paid/#comment-1683094</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[conormacleod]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2012 17:46:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=435212#comment-1683094</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[16 Career TD&#039;s! Never more than 6 in a year. Never more than 70 catches. All for the low, low price of $21.5 mil guaranteed! Wow.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>16 Career TD&#8217;s! Never more than 6 in a year. Never more than 70 catches. All for the low, low price of $21.5 mil guaranteed! Wow.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: boon613</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/03/27/vikings-wanted-pierre-garcon-but-not-for-what-redskins-paid/#comment-1683091</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[boon613]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2012 17:46:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=435212#comment-1683091</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Garcon is the big winner here.  Who wants two seasons of crappy QB&#039;s throwing to them back-to-back? Christian Ponder is a backup at best.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Garcon is the big winner here.  Who wants two seasons of crappy QB&#8217;s throwing to them back-to-back? Christian Ponder is a backup at best.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: k0mbucha</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/03/27/vikings-wanted-pierre-garcon-but-not-for-what-redskins-paid/#comment-1683072</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[k0mbucha]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2012 17:42:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=435212#comment-1683072</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There are alot of mis-informed posts about Garcon` numbers, last year he had the best numbers of his career and that was with horrible Curtis Painter and Collins throwing him the ball. He also in the top 5 YAC  [Yards After Catch] percentages in the league . 

The Colts offered him a very similar contract plus there was a huge market for him, but only the brain dead couldn&#039;t see that and choose to take the ignorant stance that the Redskins over spent!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are alot of mis-informed posts about Garcon` numbers, last year he had the best numbers of his career and that was with horrible Curtis Painter and Collins throwing him the ball. He also in the top 5 YAC  [Yards After Catch] percentages in the league . </p>
<p>The Colts offered him a very similar contract plus there was a huge market for him, but only the brain dead couldn&#8217;t see that and choose to take the ignorant stance that the Redskins over spent!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: patsaintsbroncoscheat</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/03/27/vikings-wanted-pierre-garcon-but-not-for-what-redskins-paid/#comment-1683070</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[patsaintsbroncoscheat]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2012 17:41:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=435212#comment-1683070</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I love how the Skins try to buy the superbowl every year. Additionally every year they get more and more pathetic. It is getting to the point where we should consider asking the arena league if they will take one more team.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love how the Skins try to buy the superbowl every year. Additionally every year they get more and more pathetic. It is getting to the point where we should consider asking the arena league if they will take one more team.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sadskinsfan89</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/03/27/vikings-wanted-pierre-garcon-but-not-for-what-redskins-paid/#comment-1683064</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[sadskinsfan89]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2012 17:40:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=435212#comment-1683064</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@7to10for6allday.  im glad you are so worried about where snyders money is going. The eagles won 2 more games than the skins did with arguably twice as much talent and a 100million $ Quarterback.  why don&#039;t you worry about fixing your own team before you fix someone elses. And I GUARANTEE the skins and boys get the ruling reversed in court. They broke zero rules. whet other team had the chance to do the exact same thing. Its ok I like when philly fans always talk about the skins.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@7to10for6allday.  im glad you are so worried about where snyders money is going. The eagles won 2 more games than the skins did with arguably twice as much talent and a 100million $ Quarterback.  why don&#8217;t you worry about fixing your own team before you fix someone elses. And I GUARANTEE the skins and boys get the ruling reversed in court. They broke zero rules. whet other team had the chance to do the exact same thing. Its ok I like when philly fans always talk about the skins.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Overtime Sports Talk Show</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/03/27/vikings-wanted-pierre-garcon-but-not-for-what-redskins-paid/#comment-1683049</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[The Overtime Sports Talk Show]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2012 17:36:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=435212#comment-1683049</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nobody remembers contracts when the season starts. Only Touchdowns, and wins..]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nobody remembers contracts when the season starts. Only Touchdowns, and wins..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bozosforall</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/03/27/vikings-wanted-pierre-garcon-but-not-for-what-redskins-paid/#comment-1683046</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[bozosforall]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2012 17:35:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=435212#comment-1683046</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[pastabelly says: 
Mar 27, 2012 12:54 PM 
Garcon is nothing special. Wallace and Lloyd were the best two on the market.

__
You are dreaming (or an idiot Pats fan) if you think that Brandon &quot;One Good Season Only&quot; Lloyd is anywhere near as good as Mike &quot;Career Stud for All 60 Minutes&quot; Wallace is.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>pastabelly says:<br />
Mar 27, 2012 12:54 PM<br />
Garcon is nothing special. Wallace and Lloyd were the best two on the market.</p>
<p>__<br />
You are dreaming (or an idiot Pats fan) if you think that Brandon &#8220;One Good Season Only&#8221; Lloyd is anywhere near as good as Mike &#8220;Career Stud for All 60 Minutes&#8221; Wallace is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: barroomhero80</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/03/27/vikings-wanted-pierre-garcon-but-not-for-what-redskins-paid/#comment-1683045</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[barroomhero80]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2012 17:35:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=435212#comment-1683045</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Glad they backed out. Too much for not enough]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Glad they backed out. Too much for not enough</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: switch123</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/03/27/vikings-wanted-pierre-garcon-but-not-for-what-redskins-paid/#comment-1683044</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[switch123]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2012 17:35:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=435212#comment-1683044</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[And thats why YOUR team always loses and Agents dont want there client to go there. they dont want to doe any money out.

Same oh, line from the haters. Oh that was way to much money to pay. Well thats why your team sucks. Because they keep dropping the ball and make excuses (HOLGREN).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And thats why YOUR team always loses and Agents dont want there client to go there. they dont want to doe any money out.</p>
<p>Same oh, line from the haters. Oh that was way to much money to pay. Well thats why your team sucks. Because they keep dropping the ball and make excuses (HOLGREN).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
