<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: After Pro Day, no consensus on Trent Richardson&#8217;s forty time</title>
	<atom:link href="http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/03/29/after-pro-day-no-consensus-on-trent-richardsons-forty-time/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/03/29/after-pro-day-no-consensus-on-trent-richardsons-forty-time/</link>
	<description>ProFootballTalk on NBCSports.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 01:00:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: chadm29</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/03/29/after-pro-day-no-consensus-on-trent-richardsons-forty-time/#comment-1691879</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[chadm29]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2012 23:28:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=450308#comment-1691879</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How many 1st Round QBs not named Manning have won a Super Bowl in the past 20+ years? Answer: 2

So now it&#039;s all the rage to reach for mediocre QBs in the 1st round when history says you should do otherwise. So the same knock on drafting RBs high could also apply to the QB position...but you don&#039;t hear that very often.  No one really questions using a high pick on a QB.

Richardson is a unique talent and could be a great NFL RB, not just a good one. Unless there&#039;s a &quot;can&#039;t miss&quot; OL or DL available that is a difference maker, I&#039;d definitely use a top 5 pick on Richardson...and feel pretty confident he&#039;ll make an immediate impact for the team.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How many 1st Round QBs not named Manning have won a Super Bowl in the past 20+ years? Answer: 2</p>
<p>So now it&#8217;s all the rage to reach for mediocre QBs in the 1st round when history says you should do otherwise. So the same knock on drafting RBs high could also apply to the QB position&#8230;but you don&#8217;t hear that very often.  No one really questions using a high pick on a QB.</p>
<p>Richardson is a unique talent and could be a great NFL RB, not just a good one. Unless there&#8217;s a &#8220;can&#8217;t miss&#8221; OL or DL available that is a difference maker, I&#8217;d definitely use a top 5 pick on Richardson&#8230;and feel pretty confident he&#8217;ll make an immediate impact for the team.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bucwild05</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/03/29/after-pro-day-no-consensus-on-trent-richardsons-forty-time/#comment-1691062</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[bucwild05]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2012 18:53:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=450308#comment-1691062</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[patswhatsup says: 
If cleveland takes him then poor bucs…

They’ll just be stuck with Justin Blackmon opposite Vincent Jackson!

I’m sure they’ll be happy either way.
__________________________________________________________________

Disagree.... It would be Claiborne.  The Bucs have Williams opposite of V-Jax.  They don&#039;t need WR help at this point.  

I, as a Bucs fan, still am torn between the RB or CB.  It&#039;s tough.  I do see that if the Bucs want Richardson, I see them trading picks with the Vikings.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>patswhatsup says:<br />
If cleveland takes him then poor bucs…</p>
<p>They’ll just be stuck with Justin Blackmon opposite Vincent Jackson!</p>
<p>I’m sure they’ll be happy either way.<br />
__________________________________________________________________</p>
<p>Disagree&#8230;. It would be Claiborne.  The Bucs have Williams opposite of V-Jax.  They don&#8217;t need WR help at this point.  </p>
<p>I, as a Bucs fan, still am torn between the RB or CB.  It&#8217;s tough.  I do see that if the Bucs want Richardson, I see them trading picks with the Vikings.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zack1102</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/03/29/after-pro-day-no-consensus-on-trent-richardsons-forty-time/#comment-1689825</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[zack1102]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2012 05:08:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=450308#comment-1689825</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[He is a great back. Stop trying to but him down about how fast he was at his pro day. But if you watch him in college he was a complete back. Let&#039;s go bengals]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>He is a great back. Stop trying to but him down about how fast he was at his pro day. But if you watch him in college he was a complete back. Let&#8217;s go bengals</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zack1102</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/03/29/after-pro-day-no-consensus-on-trent-richardsons-forty-time/#comment-1689822</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[zack1102]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2012 05:05:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=450308#comment-1689822</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Trent Is a great running back. Let him play , it doesn&#039;t matter how fast he is or is he going to be a extraordinary back in the nfl. Everybody knows that he was a great running back, if u watch him in college]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Trent Is a great running back. Let him play , it doesn&#8217;t matter how fast he is or is he going to be a extraordinary back in the nfl. Everybody knows that he was a great running back, if u watch him in college</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: trubroncfan07</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/03/29/after-pro-day-no-consensus-on-trent-richardsons-forty-time/#comment-1689721</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[trubroncfan07]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2012 03:28:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=450308#comment-1689721</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There going to draft Tannehill, only way they can get a QB is by drafting one.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There going to draft Tannehill, only way they can get a QB is by drafting one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hrdcorbengalsfan</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/03/29/after-pro-day-no-consensus-on-trent-richardsons-forty-time/#comment-1689658</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[hrdcorbengalsfan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2012 02:36:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=450308#comment-1689658</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Typical browns fashion...draft him this year, trade him next!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Typical browns fashion&#8230;draft him this year, trade him next!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: patswhatsup</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/03/29/after-pro-day-no-consensus-on-trent-richardsons-forty-time/#comment-1689636</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[patswhatsup]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2012 02:20:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=450308#comment-1689636</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If cleveland takes him then poor bucs...

They&#039;ll just be stuck with Justin Blackmon opposite Vincent Jackson!

I&#039;m sure they&#039;ll be happy either way.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If cleveland takes him then poor bucs&#8230;</p>
<p>They&#8217;ll just be stuck with Justin Blackmon opposite Vincent Jackson!</p>
<p>I&#8217;m sure they&#8217;ll be happy either way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: slowclyde86</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/03/29/after-pro-day-no-consensus-on-trent-richardsons-forty-time/#comment-1689599</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[slowclyde86]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2012 01:47:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=450308#comment-1689599</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I must say I too think he would look good in Cleveland. He is player.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I must say I too think he would look good in Cleveland. He is player.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: brownoholic</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/03/29/after-pro-day-no-consensus-on-trent-richardsons-forty-time/#comment-1689532</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[brownoholic]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2012 01:03:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=450308#comment-1689532</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m sold on this guy.  I&#039;ve been thinking it over forever now and I now really think he can help out McCoy and the Browns&#039; offense more than anyone else at pick #4.  Considerably more than Blackmon could, and I really like Blackmon.  There are great WRs that we can get at pick #s 22 &amp;/or 37.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m sold on this guy.  I&#8217;ve been thinking it over forever now and I now really think he can help out McCoy and the Browns&#8217; offense more than anyone else at pick #4.  Considerably more than Blackmon could, and I really like Blackmon.  There are great WRs that we can get at pick #s 22 &amp;/or 37.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hmbutter49</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/03/29/after-pro-day-no-consensus-on-trent-richardsons-forty-time/#comment-1689413</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[hmbutter49]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2012 00:11:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=450308#comment-1689413</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[had to throw that &quot;(most)&quot;in there for the raiders]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>had to throw that &#8220;(most)&#8221;in there for the raiders</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: theytukrjobs</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/03/29/after-pro-day-no-consensus-on-trent-richardsons-forty-time/#comment-1689408</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[theytukrjobs]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2012 00:07:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=450308#comment-1689408</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Since when is a 4.4 forty for a guy who can throw up 25 reps of 225 a bad thing?  Richardson doesn&#039;t have the pure running ability that some of the elite college backs have but he combines near-elite running with great blocking and pass catching, which seldom go hand in hand.  

Seems he&#039;s coming out of college at the right time because teams are looking for backs that can catch and block, while still being dangerous to go the distance.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since when is a 4.4 forty for a guy who can throw up 25 reps of 225 a bad thing?  Richardson doesn&#8217;t have the pure running ability that some of the elite college backs have but he combines near-elite running with great blocking and pass catching, which seldom go hand in hand.  </p>
<p>Seems he&#8217;s coming out of college at the right time because teams are looking for backs that can catch and block, while still being dangerous to go the distance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bimbomoose</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/03/29/after-pro-day-no-consensus-on-trent-richardsons-forty-time/#comment-1689384</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[bimbomoose]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2012 23:55:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=450308#comment-1689384</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This guy has elite RB written all over him. Barring injury, he&#039;ll be gr8!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This guy has elite RB written all over him. Barring injury, he&#8217;ll be gr8!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: voiceofsweetness</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/03/29/after-pro-day-no-consensus-on-trent-richardsons-forty-time/#comment-1689368</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[voiceofsweetness]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2012 23:50:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=450308#comment-1689368</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;RB Peterson, Vikings = record of 3 – 13–Not because of AD&quot;
 Actually in this case it is partly because the running back. The absurd contract he signed cost him his All-Pro Center, LT, &amp; LG in succession without a solid replacement plan.
 But totally agree with the rest]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;RB Peterson, Vikings = record of 3 – 13–Not because of AD&#8221;<br />
 Actually in this case it is partly because the running back. The absurd contract he signed cost him his All-Pro Center, LT, &amp; LG in succession without a solid replacement plan.<br />
 But totally agree with the rest</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vondoom92</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/03/29/after-pro-day-no-consensus-on-trent-richardsons-forty-time/#comment-1689334</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[vondoom92]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2012 23:37:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=450308#comment-1689334</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As a Browns fan you have to be thinking either;

Blackmon and Martin 

or 

Richardson and Hill/Wright 

with the first round. If it were me i would pick Blackmon/Martin]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a Browns fan you have to be thinking either;</p>
<p>Blackmon and Martin </p>
<p>or </p>
<p>Richardson and Hill/Wright </p>
<p>with the first round. If it were me i would pick Blackmon/Martin</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stayclassyasheville</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/03/29/after-pro-day-no-consensus-on-trent-richardsons-forty-time/#comment-1689275</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[stayclassyasheville]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2012 23:16:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=450308#comment-1689275</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Could Vikes get Bucs to trade picks and leapfrog Browns? Move back and pick up a late rnd. pick possibly.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Could Vikes get Bucs to trade picks and leapfrog Browns? Move back and pick up a late rnd. pick possibly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dawglbfan</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/03/29/after-pro-day-no-consensus-on-trent-richardsons-forty-time/#comment-1689273</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[dawglbfan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2012 23:14:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=450308#comment-1689273</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[These are a scheme running backs, Richardson is a complete back: Running, Catching and Blocking that is why he will be a top ten pick]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These are a scheme running backs, Richardson is a complete back: Running, Catching and Blocking that is why he will be a top ten pick</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ubb44</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/03/29/after-pro-day-no-consensus-on-trent-richardsons-forty-time/#comment-1689221</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ubb44]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2012 22:50:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=450308#comment-1689221</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[RB Peterson, Vikings = record of 3 – 13--Not because of AD


RB Steven Jackson, Rams = record of 2 – 14---Not because of Jackson


RB CJ Spiller, Bills = record of 6 – 9--Please even mentioning him with the likes of the previous two is stupid.


RB Ryan Grant, Packers undrafted FA = record 15 – 1--Not because of the RB


RB Green-Ellis, Pats undrafted FA = record 13 -3--Not because of the RB


RB Arian Foster, Texans undrafted FA = record 10 – 6--an exception not the rule.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>RB Peterson, Vikings = record of 3 – 13&#8211;Not because of AD</p>
<p>RB Steven Jackson, Rams = record of 2 – 14&#8212;Not because of Jackson</p>
<p>RB CJ Spiller, Bills = record of 6 – 9&#8211;Please even mentioning him with the likes of the previous two is stupid.</p>
<p>RB Ryan Grant, Packers undrafted FA = record 15 – 1&#8211;Not because of the RB</p>
<p>RB Green-Ellis, Pats undrafted FA = record 13 -3&#8211;Not because of the RB</p>
<p>RB Arian Foster, Texans undrafted FA = record 10 – 6&#8211;an exception not the rule.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: voiceofsweetness</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/03/29/after-pro-day-no-consensus-on-trent-richardsons-forty-time/#comment-1689210</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[voiceofsweetness]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2012 22:44:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=450308#comment-1689210</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot; Does everyone at these things just use the stopwatch on their iphones? How can everyone have different results? &quot;
 Can&#039;t think of too many GM&#039;s, scouts, or coaches that have the speed to start their time with him on the same line and run with him to stop it exactly on the other line lol Maybe Parcells.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8221; Does everyone at these things just use the stopwatch on their iphones? How can everyone have different results? &#8221;<br />
 Can&#8217;t think of too many GM&#8217;s, scouts, or coaches that have the speed to start their time with him on the same line and run with him to stop it exactly on the other line lol Maybe Parcells.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: muckfodell</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/03/29/after-pro-day-no-consensus-on-trent-richardsons-forty-time/#comment-1689204</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[muckfodell]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2012 22:43:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=450308#comment-1689204</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;the cleveland clowns will draft tannehill,and watch trent go off hook with some other team..pretty much like every other fa they wanted and failed to get..&quot;

Fafaflunky. 

Is that your job description?

Probably should be...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;the cleveland clowns will draft tannehill,and watch trent go off hook with some other team..pretty much like every other fa they wanted and failed to get..&#8221;</p>
<p>Fafaflunky. </p>
<p>Is that your job description?</p>
<p>Probably should be&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dawglbfan</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/03/29/after-pro-day-no-consensus-on-trent-richardsons-forty-time/#comment-1689165</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[dawglbfan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2012 22:25:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=450308#comment-1689165</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As a Browns fan I think we should draft TR... I know, I know all I hear is &quot;Its a passing league&quot; but tell that to Ray Rice who was a botched kick away from the super bowl.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a Browns fan I think we should draft TR&#8230; I know, I know all I hear is &#8220;Its a passing league&#8221; but tell that to Ray Rice who was a botched kick away from the super bowl.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: phillybirds</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/03/29/after-pro-day-no-consensus-on-trent-richardsons-forty-time/#comment-1689158</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[phillybirds]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2012 22:21:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=450308#comment-1689158</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[browns are trading this pick. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>browns are trading this pick. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pacodawg</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/03/29/after-pro-day-no-consensus-on-trent-richardsons-forty-time/#comment-1689153</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[pacodawg]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2012 22:19:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=450308#comment-1689153</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My fiend runs a 4.4 forty he is on the high school track team, I think he can play in the nfl]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My fiend runs a 4.4 forty he is on the high school track team, I think he can play in the nfl</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cotts1</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/03/29/after-pro-day-no-consensus-on-trent-richardsons-forty-time/#comment-1689060</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[cotts1]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2012 21:43:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=450308#comment-1689060</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Why no mention of Mark Barron also working out? I would like to know how he looked. 

Thanks]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why no mention of Mark Barron also working out? I would like to know how he looked. </p>
<p>Thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KIR</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/03/29/after-pro-day-no-consensus-on-trent-richardsons-forty-time/#comment-1689042</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[KIR]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2012 21:36:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=450308#comment-1689042</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@dweth

Tom Brady was drafted in the 6th round. Does that mean he should have been drafted in the six round?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@dweth</p>
<p>Tom Brady was drafted in the 6th round. Does that mean he should have been drafted in the six round?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bbk1000</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/03/29/after-pro-day-no-consensus-on-trent-richardsons-forty-time/#comment-1689019</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[bbk1000]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2012 21:30:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=450308#comment-1689019</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The forty times are stupid unless you run an 8....]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The forty times are stupid unless you run an 8&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nflfollower</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/03/29/after-pro-day-no-consensus-on-trent-richardsons-forty-time/#comment-1688987</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[nflfollower]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2012 21:19:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=450308#comment-1688987</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Totallyuselessme-----can&#039;t get a blackmon after round one?   Ok, but victor Cruz was undrafted.   So I guess there is no talented WR&#039;s in the later rounds?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Totallyuselessme&#8212;&#8211;can&#8217;t get a blackmon after round one?   Ok, but victor Cruz was undrafted.   So I guess there is no talented WR&#8217;s in the later rounds?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dweth</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/03/29/after-pro-day-no-consensus-on-trent-richardsons-forty-time/#comment-1688970</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[dweth]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2012 21:15:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=450308#comment-1688970</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[KIR says: Mar 29, 2012 3:59 PM

Frank Gore 13 3
Michael Turner 10 6
Ray Rice 12 4

Do they count? Of course not. Who was in the NFL Championship game? Ray Rice &amp; Frank Gore. Does that count? Of course not.

great backs! None of which were drafted in top 10.
Ray Rice - drafted 55th in 2nd round
Michael Turner drafted 5th round
Frank Gore - 3rd round]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>KIR says: Mar 29, 2012 3:59 PM</p>
<p>Frank Gore 13 3<br />
Michael Turner 10 6<br />
Ray Rice 12 4</p>
<p>Do they count? Of course not. Who was in the NFL Championship game? Ray Rice &amp; Frank Gore. Does that count? Of course not.</p>
<p>great backs! None of which were drafted in top 10.<br />
Ray Rice &#8211; drafted 55th in 2nd round<br />
Michael Turner drafted 5th round<br />
Frank Gore &#8211; 3rd round</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: grninerfan</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/03/29/after-pro-day-no-consensus-on-trent-richardsons-forty-time/#comment-1688968</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[grninerfan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2012 21:15:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=450308#comment-1688968</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Go get him Cleveland. I know he&#039;ll be gone by pick # 30.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Go get him Cleveland. I know he&#8217;ll be gone by pick # 30.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: arnoldwadsworth</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/03/29/after-pro-day-no-consensus-on-trent-richardsons-forty-time/#comment-1688965</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[arnoldwadsworth]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2012 21:14:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=450308#comment-1688965</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think the Bucs should take him. Gives them a 1, 2 punch. Plus with injuries you never know.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the Bucs should take him. Gives them a 1, 2 punch. Plus with injuries you never know.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jerryjoneslikespurpledrank</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/03/29/after-pro-day-no-consensus-on-trent-richardsons-forty-time/#comment-1688954</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jerryjoneslikespurpledrank]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2012 21:09:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=450308#comment-1688954</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Who cares!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who cares!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
