<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: In survey of nine teams, eight call Osweiler a fourth-round prospect</title>
	<atom:link href="http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/03/31/in-survey-of-nine-teams-eight-call-osweiler-a-fourth-round-prospect/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/03/31/in-survey-of-nine-teams-eight-call-osweiler-a-fourth-round-prospect/</link>
	<description>ProFootballTalk on NBCSports.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 23:50:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: mobuccsfan</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/03/31/in-survey-of-nine-teams-eight-call-osweiler-a-fourth-round-prospect/#comment-1693623</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[mobuccsfan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Apr 2012 06:13:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=468884#comment-1693623</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I don&#039;t think Moore or Keenum get drafted in the first round or even the second round...but I can see both of them being better than people think. Solid pros to possibly even a surprise Tom Brady-esque career. Especially Keenum. Just my opinion. 
I agree with many posters. In the end, the draft is a crap-shoot. You will hit and you will miss. Some teams just seem to miss more than hit because poor scouting department, poor GMs, etc.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think Moore or Keenum get drafted in the first round or even the second round&#8230;but I can see both of them being better than people think. Solid pros to possibly even a surprise Tom Brady-esque career. Especially Keenum. Just my opinion.<br />
I agree with many posters. In the end, the draft is a crap-shoot. You will hit and you will miss. Some teams just seem to miss more than hit because poor scouting department, poor GMs, etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GG Eden</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/03/31/in-survey-of-nine-teams-eight-call-osweiler-a-fourth-round-prospect/#comment-1693547</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[GG Eden]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Apr 2012 03:26:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=468884#comment-1693547</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[techieluddite says: Mar 31, 2012 4:00 PM

GG,
What you said about RG III is pretty much what a lot of people said about Cam Newton.

----

The difference is....Newton was generally expected and predicted to bust, the majority of &#039;pundits&#039; like us. Whereas everyone in 2012 is pretty much convinced RG3 is a certified superstar.

As some experts have noted, RG3 is like someone still in med school while Luck is already a practicing GP. When I look over Luck&#039;s &#039;versus&#039; videos, I really do see an NFL-caliber QB already. When I see RG3&#039;s &#039;versus&#039; videos I see it&#039;s all potential, but there are a lot of areas his game will need coaching and dedication still to become NFL caliber. Those things I mentioned stand out. I can see RG3 struggling in the early going, scrambling around left and right avoiding pressure, throwing the ball into double coverage, getting picked off, fumbling trying to dance around too much, locking on too much and taking too long to read and release etc.

Not saying he WILL bust, but he will struggle to &#039;get&#039; where Luck already is.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>techieluddite says: Mar 31, 2012 4:00 PM</p>
<p>GG,<br />
What you said about RG III is pretty much what a lot of people said about Cam Newton.</p>
<p>&#8212;-</p>
<p>The difference is&#8230;.Newton was generally expected and predicted to bust, the majority of &#8216;pundits&#8217; like us. Whereas everyone in 2012 is pretty much convinced RG3 is a certified superstar.</p>
<p>As some experts have noted, RG3 is like someone still in med school while Luck is already a practicing GP. When I look over Luck&#8217;s &#8216;versus&#8217; videos, I really do see an NFL-caliber QB already. When I see RG3&#8242;s &#8216;versus&#8217; videos I see it&#8217;s all potential, but there are a lot of areas his game will need coaching and dedication still to become NFL caliber. Those things I mentioned stand out. I can see RG3 struggling in the early going, scrambling around left and right avoiding pressure, throwing the ball into double coverage, getting picked off, fumbling trying to dance around too much, locking on too much and taking too long to read and release etc.</p>
<p>Not saying he WILL bust, but he will struggle to &#8216;get&#8217; where Luck already is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jefftberg</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/03/31/in-survey-of-nine-teams-eight-call-osweiler-a-fourth-round-prospect/#comment-1693266</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jefftberg]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Mar 2012 23:13:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=468884#comment-1693266</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[He could easily go in the first round.  It only takes one team to become enamored with you.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>He could easily go in the first round.  It only takes one team to become enamored with you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: truthserum4u</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/03/31/in-survey-of-nine-teams-eight-call-osweiler-a-fourth-round-prospect/#comment-1693204</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[truthserum4u]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Mar 2012 21:49:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=468884#comment-1693204</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There&#039;s so much misinformation being distributed by teams, so players fall to them, who knows how teams really feel about prospects?


Casserly&#039;s comment &quot;The workout doesn’t change the rating on the tape.&quot;, while making sense, certainly doesn&#039;t seem to be the case as players like D Poe, S Hill, S Gilmore &amp; J Robinson appear to be rising up draft boards based on their workout numbers and not game tape (oddly enough even with Moayock).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s so much misinformation being distributed by teams, so players fall to them, who knows how teams really feel about prospects?</p>
<p>Casserly&#8217;s comment &#8220;The workout doesn’t change the rating on the tape.&#8221;, while making sense, certainly doesn&#8217;t seem to be the case as players like D Poe, S Hill, S Gilmore &amp; J Robinson appear to be rising up draft boards based on their workout numbers and not game tape (oddly enough even with Moayock).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: babyhorsemorgan</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/03/31/in-survey-of-nine-teams-eight-call-osweiler-a-fourth-round-prospect/#comment-1693202</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[babyhorsemorgan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Mar 2012 21:48:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=468884#comment-1693202</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@eaglebranded - Too early to judge last year&#039;s quarterbacks. Newton jumped out fast, but no one questioned his talent, they were worried about his character and personality. Historically, the quarterbacks who started fastest in the league seldom ended up being the best of the draft. Vince Young won the same honors as Newton as a rookie. Gabbert was considered a longer term project, with huge upside. No one expected him to have to step right in as a starter, especially the Jaguars. He was the only early entry prospect at the position, with a year less experience than the others.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@eaglebranded &#8211; Too early to judge last year&#8217;s quarterbacks. Newton jumped out fast, but no one questioned his talent, they were worried about his character and personality. Historically, the quarterbacks who started fastest in the league seldom ended up being the best of the draft. Vince Young won the same honors as Newton as a rookie. Gabbert was considered a longer term project, with huge upside. No one expected him to have to step right in as a starter, especially the Jaguars. He was the only early entry prospect at the position, with a year less experience than the others.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: randallflagg52</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/03/31/in-survey-of-nine-teams-eight-call-osweiler-a-fourth-round-prospect/#comment-1693126</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[randallflagg52]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Mar 2012 20:37:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=468884#comment-1693126</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It didn&#039;t take long for someone to bring up that midget from Boise St. Evey time I hear about Moore or that Kassum kid from Houston like they are first rounders I just laugh.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It didn&#8217;t take long for someone to bring up that midget from Boise St. Evey time I hear about Moore or that Kassum kid from Houston like they are first rounders I just laugh.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: techieluddite</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/03/31/in-survey-of-nine-teams-eight-call-osweiler-a-fourth-round-prospect/#comment-1693081</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[techieluddite]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Mar 2012 20:00:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=468884#comment-1693081</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[GG,
What you said about RG III is pretty much what a lot of people said about Cam Newton.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>GG,<br />
What you said about RG III is pretty much what a lot of people said about Cam Newton.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: macmansux</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/03/31/in-survey-of-nine-teams-eight-call-osweiler-a-fourth-round-prospect/#comment-1693026</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[macmansux]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Mar 2012 19:08:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=468884#comment-1693026</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[KIR says:Mar 31, 2012 1:28 PM 

@ezpkns34 says: Mar 31, 2012 10:08 AM
 
“KIR says: Mar 31, 2012 9:30 AM
 
QB’s are over drafted and RB’s are under drafted. If there was a redraft, I could name aprox 16 to 18 RB’s that would be taken in the 1st round and not by TV analyst I’m talking by actual NFL GM’s”
 ——————————————-
 
How about you simply name any year since the merger where there should have been 18 RBs taken in the first round
 
Needless to say, I won’t be holding my breath on this one
 ______________________________
 REdraft means…… As in do over


Of course if there was a redraft, things would be a lot different.  The Chargers would never have taken Ryan Leaf and the Raiders would never have taken JaMarcus Russell.  Since you&#039;re using RBs though, I&#039;ll use the 2009 NFL Draft for this.  I&#039;m sure Arian Foster would have been drafted in the 1st-round based on what they&#039;ve seen, instead he went undrafted.  LeSean McCoy would have been a first-round pick too, based on his production, though he was just a 2nd-rounder.  But, Knowshon Moreno and Donald Brown would most likely not be 1st round picks based on their production.  The point of all of this is teams do make mistakes and they do occasionally hit the jackpot.  No point in trying to change the past since it&#039;s a done deal and can&#039;t be fixed... And even if there were a redraft, I highly doubt 16 to 18 RBs would go in the first round because of the ridiculous talent there is at all the other positions.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>KIR says:Mar 31, 2012 1:28 PM </p>
<p>@ezpkns34 says: Mar 31, 2012 10:08 AM</p>
<p>“KIR says: Mar 31, 2012 9:30 AM</p>
<p>QB’s are over drafted and RB’s are under drafted. If there was a redraft, I could name aprox 16 to 18 RB’s that would be taken in the 1st round and not by TV analyst I’m talking by actual NFL GM’s”<br />
 ——————————————-</p>
<p>How about you simply name any year since the merger where there should have been 18 RBs taken in the first round</p>
<p>Needless to say, I won’t be holding my breath on this one<br />
 ______________________________<br />
 REdraft means…… As in do over</p>
<p>Of course if there was a redraft, things would be a lot different.  The Chargers would never have taken Ryan Leaf and the Raiders would never have taken JaMarcus Russell.  Since you&#8217;re using RBs though, I&#8217;ll use the 2009 NFL Draft for this.  I&#8217;m sure Arian Foster would have been drafted in the 1st-round based on what they&#8217;ve seen, instead he went undrafted.  LeSean McCoy would have been a first-round pick too, based on his production, though he was just a 2nd-rounder.  But, Knowshon Moreno and Donald Brown would most likely not be 1st round picks based on their production.  The point of all of this is teams do make mistakes and they do occasionally hit the jackpot.  No point in trying to change the past since it&#8217;s a done deal and can&#8217;t be fixed&#8230; And even if there were a redraft, I highly doubt 16 to 18 RBs would go in the first round because of the ridiculous talent there is at all the other positions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ajsjr40</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/03/31/in-survey-of-nine-teams-eight-call-osweiler-a-fourth-round-prospect/#comment-1692967</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ajsjr40]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Mar 2012 18:32:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=468884#comment-1692967</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Why do people still use alleged analysis from Gil Brandt as relevant information? The last time he drafted a player that had any impact in the NFL was forty years ago.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why do people still use alleged analysis from Gil Brandt as relevant information? The last time he drafted a player that had any impact in the NFL was forty years ago.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: babyhorsemorgan</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/03/31/in-survey-of-nine-teams-eight-call-osweiler-a-fourth-round-prospect/#comment-1692958</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[babyhorsemorgan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Mar 2012 18:26:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=468884#comment-1692958</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Osweiler was invited to the Green Room. The NFL does it&#039;s homework before extending the invitations. They don&#039;t want guys sitting there for three rounds. Mark Herzlich was an exception last year as a cancer survivor, but everyone else they invited was drafted by the middle of the second round, I believe.

If you look back a year, Gil Brandt&#039;s assessments on the QBs were spectacularly more accurate than the internet geeks. I&#039;ll go with Gil 10 times out of 10. All the draft dorks do is tweet and retweet each other until they all end up saying the same thing. Brandt doesn&#039;t listen to that noise, he goes on about 60 years worth of experience.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Osweiler was invited to the Green Room. The NFL does it&#8217;s homework before extending the invitations. They don&#8217;t want guys sitting there for three rounds. Mark Herzlich was an exception last year as a cancer survivor, but everyone else they invited was drafted by the middle of the second round, I believe.</p>
<p>If you look back a year, Gil Brandt&#8217;s assessments on the QBs were spectacularly more accurate than the internet geeks. I&#8217;ll go with Gil 10 times out of 10. All the draft dorks do is tweet and retweet each other until they all end up saying the same thing. Brandt doesn&#8217;t listen to that noise, he goes on about 60 years worth of experience.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jeziyo247</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/03/31/in-survey-of-nine-teams-eight-call-osweiler-a-fourth-round-prospect/#comment-1692946</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jeziyo247]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Mar 2012 18:12:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=468884#comment-1692946</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Any QB drafted is a gamble weather its the first round or seventh round. Tom brady proves that no matter what round you&#039;re picked, you can be an elite QB, whereas Jamarcus Russell proved that even though you&#039;re a first rounder doesn&#039;t mean everything is gonna pan out. Its all about the will of that individual to work hard to be great and the right team to groom that QB and know when and what situation to put them in.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Any QB drafted is a gamble weather its the first round or seventh round. Tom brady proves that no matter what round you&#8217;re picked, you can be an elite QB, whereas Jamarcus Russell proved that even though you&#8217;re a first rounder doesn&#8217;t mean everything is gonna pan out. Its all about the will of that individual to work hard to be great and the right team to groom that QB and know when and what situation to put them in.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KIR</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/03/31/in-survey-of-nine-teams-eight-call-osweiler-a-fourth-round-prospect/#comment-1692880</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[KIR]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Mar 2012 17:28:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=468884#comment-1692880</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@ezpkns34 says: Mar 31, 2012 10:08 AM

“KIR says: Mar 31, 2012 9:30 AM

QB’s are over drafted and RB’s are under drafted. If there was a redraft, I could name aprox 16 to 18 RB’s that would be taken in the 1st round and not by TV analyst I’m talking by actual NFL GM’s”
——————————————-

How about you simply name any year since the merger where there should have been 18 RBs taken in the first round

Needless to say, I won’t be holding my breath on this one
______________________________
REdraft means...... As in do over]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ezpkns34 says: Mar 31, 2012 10:08 AM</p>
<p>“KIR says: Mar 31, 2012 9:30 AM</p>
<p>QB’s are over drafted and RB’s are under drafted. If there was a redraft, I could name aprox 16 to 18 RB’s that would be taken in the 1st round and not by TV analyst I’m talking by actual NFL GM’s”<br />
——————————————-</p>
<p>How about you simply name any year since the merger where there should have been 18 RBs taken in the first round</p>
<p>Needless to say, I won’t be holding my breath on this one<br />
______________________________<br />
REdraft means&#8230;&#8230; As in do over</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cluelessdufus</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/03/31/in-survey-of-nine-teams-eight-call-osweiler-a-fourth-round-prospect/#comment-1692838</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[cluelessdufus]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Mar 2012 16:54:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=468884#comment-1692838</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Fins will grab him with there chicago 3rd round pick]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Fins will grab him with there chicago 3rd round pick</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: waltdawg</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/03/31/in-survey-of-nine-teams-eight-call-osweiler-a-fourth-round-prospect/#comment-1692816</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[waltdawg]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Mar 2012 16:35:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=468884#comment-1692816</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I could never and still never will believe that the Redskins took Campbell in the first round....WASTE!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I could never and still never will believe that the Redskins took Campbell in the first round&#8230;.WASTE!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: toonsterwu</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/03/31/in-survey-of-nine-teams-eight-call-osweiler-a-fourth-round-prospect/#comment-1692802</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[toonsterwu]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Mar 2012 16:24:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=468884#comment-1692802</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Comparing Osweiler to those three is fairly odd.  At the same point in the draft process, Jason Campbell was viewed as a late first/early 2nd pick.  Osweiler is largely a 2nd-4th pick.  

Losman was well liked out of college, with a more extensive body of work.  He started for 2 seasons, had athleticism and arm strength.  While there were questions about him, he was also viewed as a possible late first/early 2nd type.

It&#039;s easy to forget all these years later, but Ramsay was viewed as a first.  A late first, but a first.  He was a guy that some wondered if he would go in the mid-1st because he was clearly the number 3 QB on the board that year (behind Carr and Harrington).  The Redskins were actually praised that they were able to continually move down and still end up with the guy that they targeted all along.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Comparing Osweiler to those three is fairly odd.  At the same point in the draft process, Jason Campbell was viewed as a late first/early 2nd pick.  Osweiler is largely a 2nd-4th pick.  </p>
<p>Losman was well liked out of college, with a more extensive body of work.  He started for 2 seasons, had athleticism and arm strength.  While there were questions about him, he was also viewed as a possible late first/early 2nd type.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s easy to forget all these years later, but Ramsay was viewed as a first.  A late first, but a first.  He was a guy that some wondered if he would go in the mid-1st because he was clearly the number 3 QB on the board that year (behind Carr and Harrington).  The Redskins were actually praised that they were able to continually move down and still end up with the guy that they targeted all along.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bucfaninil</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/03/31/in-survey-of-nine-teams-eight-call-osweiler-a-fourth-round-prospect/#comment-1692781</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[bucfaninil]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Mar 2012 16:11:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=468884#comment-1692781</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[but this is a &quot;passing league&quot; lol yeah right... ask NE and Pit why they can&#039;t win one now that they went to the Pass-Only Style... QBs are so overrated now... I mean Eli is given Elite status just because he can&#039;t manage to win more than 9 games in the SB years and plays against other Pass-First teams and has a boat load of PURE LUCK

BRING BACK THE RB!!!

Only 3 Elite QBs Peyton, Brady, Brees... and only Peyton was a First Rounder...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>but this is a &#8220;passing league&#8221; lol yeah right&#8230; ask NE and Pit why they can&#8217;t win one now that they went to the Pass-Only Style&#8230; QBs are so overrated now&#8230; I mean Eli is given Elite status just because he can&#8217;t manage to win more than 9 games in the SB years and plays against other Pass-First teams and has a boat load of PURE LUCK</p>
<p>BRING BACK THE RB!!!</p>
<p>Only 3 Elite QBs Peyton, Brady, Brees&#8230; and only Peyton was a First Rounder&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cantonbound13</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/03/31/in-survey-of-nine-teams-eight-call-osweiler-a-fourth-round-prospect/#comment-1692776</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[cantonbound13]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Mar 2012 16:07:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=468884#comment-1692776</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The 9th team to have him rated a second rounder had to be the Dolphins or Vikings.  Only Ireland or Spielman could be way off.  Would Casserly be interested in the Dolphins job?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The 9th team to have him rated a second rounder had to be the Dolphins or Vikings.  Only Ireland or Spielman could be way off.  Would Casserly be interested in the Dolphins job?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: trubroncfan07</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/03/31/in-survey-of-nine-teams-eight-call-osweiler-a-fourth-round-prospect/#comment-1692755</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[trubroncfan07]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Mar 2012 15:52:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=468884#comment-1692755</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I would rather have the kid for Boise St. His game tape speaks for itself, this guy is just another example how GM&#039;s get fooled at that combine looking a these guys in shorts.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would rather have the kid for Boise St. His game tape speaks for itself, this guy is just another example how GM&#8217;s get fooled at that combine looking a these guys in shorts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eaglebranded</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/03/31/in-survey-of-nine-teams-eight-call-osweiler-a-fourth-round-prospect/#comment-1692736</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[eaglebranded]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Mar 2012 15:40:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=468884#comment-1692736</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[And those are the same analysts that said Cam shouldn&#039;t be taken first . Speaking of Cam what happened to Gabbert and the rest of the first round picks? Seem to me they had that wrong too. My point is you never know how someone will do in the NFL until they get there . Some guys do great in school the pro days everything and still flop in this league.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And those are the same analysts that said Cam shouldn&#8217;t be taken first . Speaking of Cam what happened to Gabbert and the rest of the first round picks? Seem to me they had that wrong too. My point is you never know how someone will do in the NFL until they get there . Some guys do great in school the pro days everything and still flop in this league.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: addict2sport</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/03/31/in-survey-of-nine-teams-eight-call-osweiler-a-fourth-round-prospect/#comment-1692718</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[addict2sport]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Mar 2012 15:29:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=468884#comment-1692718</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This kid is Dan McGwire all over again. These draft gurus are about as accurate as a weather man. Educated guesses and their connections within the league butter their bread. Must be nice. If I&#039;m wrong at my job 30%-40% of the time like these gurus I&#039;d be canned.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This kid is Dan McGwire all over again. These draft gurus are about as accurate as a weather man. Educated guesses and their connections within the league butter their bread. Must be nice. If I&#8217;m wrong at my job 30%-40% of the time like these gurus I&#8217;d be canned.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: realitypolice</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/03/31/in-survey-of-nine-teams-eight-call-osweiler-a-fourth-round-prospect/#comment-1692702</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[realitypolice]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Mar 2012 15:16:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=468884#comment-1692702</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[crazybeardedjack says:
Mar 31, 2012 10:09 AM
Can’t belive ANYONE would ever listen to Charlie Casserly. 
===============

Yeah, he also made the terrible decision to draft Mario Williams over Reggie Bush and Vince Young, how did that........um, never mind.

Bellichick hates Casserly because Casserly was the first to break the story that Brady was having problems with Randy Moss (Moss was traded shortly thereafter) and that Casserly was one of the first to report rumors of spy gate, which turned out to be true.

And I&#039;ll take Casserly&#039;s opinion over Brandt&#039;s.  Brandt thrived in an era with no salary cap, no free agency, and the draft had SEVENTEEN ROUNDS.

Lots of room for error in old Gil&#039;s day.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>crazybeardedjack says:<br />
Mar 31, 2012 10:09 AM<br />
Can’t belive ANYONE would ever listen to Charlie Casserly.<br />
===============</p>
<p>Yeah, he also made the terrible decision to draft Mario Williams over Reggie Bush and Vince Young, how did that&#8230;&#8230;..um, never mind.</p>
<p>Bellichick hates Casserly because Casserly was the first to break the story that Brady was having problems with Randy Moss (Moss was traded shortly thereafter) and that Casserly was one of the first to report rumors of spy gate, which turned out to be true.</p>
<p>And I&#8217;ll take Casserly&#8217;s opinion over Brandt&#8217;s.  Brandt thrived in an era with no salary cap, no free agency, and the draft had SEVENTEEN ROUNDS.</p>
<p>Lots of room for error in old Gil&#8217;s day.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ernie ernie</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/03/31/in-survey-of-nine-teams-eight-call-osweiler-a-fourth-round-prospect/#comment-1692698</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ernie ernie]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Mar 2012 15:13:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=468884#comment-1692698</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I take it this guy played one year per the article but would have had another year of eligibility but choose to go pro. Either he is a genius or an idiot.
If he is a genius he maybe would be a good second rounder, if he is an idiot then the fourth may be too high.

My point is, its not just the arm and physical abilities but the ability to read defenses. If you don&#039;t have the later, your not going to succeed aka Russel.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I take it this guy played one year per the article but would have had another year of eligibility but choose to go pro. Either he is a genius or an idiot.<br />
If he is a genius he maybe would be a good second rounder, if he is an idiot then the fourth may be too high.</p>
<p>My point is, its not just the arm and physical abilities but the ability to read defenses. If you don&#8217;t have the later, your not going to succeed aka Russel.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dubitodd123</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/03/31/in-survey-of-nine-teams-eight-call-osweiler-a-fourth-round-prospect/#comment-1692687</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[dubitodd123]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Mar 2012 15:02:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=468884#comment-1692687</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just don&#039;t see him as a franchise qb]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just don&#8217;t see him as a franchise qb</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gooboy6</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/03/31/in-survey-of-nine-teams-eight-call-osweiler-a-fourth-round-prospect/#comment-1692671</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[gooboy6]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Mar 2012 14:45:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=468884#comment-1692671</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[it is painful to listen to him on Sirius NFL RADIO, always change stations when he is on]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>it is painful to listen to him on Sirius NFL RADIO, always change stations when he is on</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: truthhurtstoo</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/03/31/in-survey-of-nine-teams-eight-call-osweiler-a-fourth-round-prospect/#comment-1692670</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[truthhurtstoo]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Mar 2012 14:44:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=468884#comment-1692670</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[jets should take him with their 1st pick. 
That would make sense based on the recent decisions.
After all, they still don&#039;t have a QB.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>jets should take him with their 1st pick.<br />
That would make sense based on the recent decisions.<br />
After all, they still don&#8217;t have a QB.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thereisalwaysnextyear</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/03/31/in-survey-of-nine-teams-eight-call-osweiler-a-fourth-round-prospect/#comment-1692669</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[thereisalwaysnextyear]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Mar 2012 14:44:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=468884#comment-1692669</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Skins spent TWO 1st round picks on Campbell AND a 3rd.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Skins spent TWO 1st round picks on Campbell AND a 3rd.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: oldbyrd</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/03/31/in-survey-of-nine-teams-eight-call-osweiler-a-fourth-round-prospect/#comment-1692645</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[oldbyrd]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Mar 2012 14:20:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=468884#comment-1692645</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[EAGLES IN 3rd round]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>EAGLES IN 3rd round</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GG Eden</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/03/31/in-survey-of-nine-teams-eight-call-osweiler-a-fourth-round-prospect/#comment-1692643</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[GG Eden]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Mar 2012 14:19:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=468884#comment-1692643</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Been going over &quot;versus&quot; videos.

I think RGIII is going to bust. He doesn&#039;t go thru progressions well. Most of his throws are &#039;one step&#039; throws/routes. First reads. But when a play consists of longer developing routes, especially with several options, he doesn&#039;t go thru them quick enough, locks on too long. He&#039;s too much of in a hurry to scramble about once a first read breaks down otherwise. In a pro-style offense, he will struggle. He has a great arm and touch I will give him that.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Been going over &#8220;versus&#8221; videos.</p>
<p>I think RGIII is going to bust. He doesn&#8217;t go thru progressions well. Most of his throws are &#8216;one step&#8217; throws/routes. First reads. But when a play consists of longer developing routes, especially with several options, he doesn&#8217;t go thru them quick enough, locks on too long. He&#8217;s too much of in a hurry to scramble about once a first read breaks down otherwise. In a pro-style offense, he will struggle. He has a great arm and touch I will give him that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rabidbillsfan</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/03/31/in-survey-of-nine-teams-eight-call-osweiler-a-fourth-round-prospect/#comment-1692640</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[rabidbillsfan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Mar 2012 14:18:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=468884#comment-1692640</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It only takes one fool though....]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It only takes one fool though&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gorilladik81</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/03/31/in-survey-of-nine-teams-eight-call-osweiler-a-fourth-round-prospect/#comment-1692632</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[gorilladik81]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Mar 2012 14:13:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=468884#comment-1692632</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sanchez was only a one year starter as well and he was a first round pick,I wish I got paid to be wrong more than I was right .]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sanchez was only a one year starter as well and he was a first round pick,I wish I got paid to be wrong more than I was right .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
