<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Appeals may focus on disconnect between bounties, on-field actions</title>
	<atom:link href="http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/01/appeals-may-focus-on-disconnect-between-bounties-on-field-actions/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/01/appeals-may-focus-on-disconnect-between-bounties-on-field-actions/</link>
	<description>ProFootballTalk on NBCSports.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 01:55:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: kodakinvegas</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/01/appeals-may-focus-on-disconnect-between-bounties-on-field-actions/#comment-1698531</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[kodakinvegas]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2012 18:22:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=480131#comment-1698531</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Come on already Goodell, refuse the appeal, mandate the punishments for the players involved, asterisk TH SB, crucify Vilma put the rules down in NO uncertain terms and let&#039;s get back to football. We are all just about tired of the rhetoric and finger pointing, whining and attitudes. Move this years SB for fan safety and penalty to the Saints Org and let&#039;s be DONE with it. Enough with the lollipops and kisses]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Come on already Goodell, refuse the appeal, mandate the punishments for the players involved, asterisk TH SB, crucify Vilma put the rules down in NO uncertain terms and let&#8217;s get back to football. We are all just about tired of the rhetoric and finger pointing, whining and attitudes. Move this years SB for fan safety and penalty to the Saints Org and let&#8217;s be DONE with it. Enough with the lollipops and kisses</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nard100</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/01/appeals-may-focus-on-disconnect-between-bounties-on-field-actions/#comment-1695911</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[nard100]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2012 17:31:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=480131#comment-1695911</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[sfsaintsfan says: 
Apr 1, 2012 11:25 PM 

I agree the Saints should be punished for possibly lying to the league, but what about the investigations of the other teams, who have players who have flat out admitted to intentionally targeting players with injuries. 

Anyone out there here of the brazen targeting of Kyle Williams of the 49′ers by players for the Giants in the NFC Championship Game just a couple of months ago? Intentionally targeting a player with a known concussion history for shots to the head, resulting in fumbles and a Super Bowl appearance for the Giants. And no investigation, let alone punishment? Fair is fair. Where is the justice from the NFL?

---------------------------------------------------------

So let me get this straight:

1. Your DC has admitted that there was a bounty program.

2. You admit your team lied about said bounty program

3. You admit the team should be punished but,

then you embellish by making unsustantiated statements like or along the lines of :

a. &quot;Everybody else is doing it&quot; - you have no proof that&#039;s true

b. You implicate another team (NY Giants) for what exactly? - injuring  a player (didn&#039;t happen), threatening to injure a player (try again).

Then you conclude, &quot;Where is the justice?&quot;  Wow!  Talk about making us all a little dumber with those arguments.  Your arguments so pathetic they don&#039;t really deserve comment.  I think we all know how this is going to end.  There is going to be a leak about the whistleblower.  Saints fans are going to villify that person for telling the truth.  Then the media is going to expose every mistake that person has ever made sense the second grade (divorce, kids out of wedlock, shoplifting a pack of gum fom 7-11, etc.) and then only when their character is completely destroyed will Saints fans breathe a sigh of relief.  PATHETIC]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>sfsaintsfan says:<br />
Apr 1, 2012 11:25 PM </p>
<p>I agree the Saints should be punished for possibly lying to the league, but what about the investigations of the other teams, who have players who have flat out admitted to intentionally targeting players with injuries. </p>
<p>Anyone out there here of the brazen targeting of Kyle Williams of the 49′ers by players for the Giants in the NFC Championship Game just a couple of months ago? Intentionally targeting a player with a known concussion history for shots to the head, resulting in fumbles and a Super Bowl appearance for the Giants. And no investigation, let alone punishment? Fair is fair. Where is the justice from the NFL?</p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;</p>
<p>So let me get this straight:</p>
<p>1. Your DC has admitted that there was a bounty program.</p>
<p>2. You admit your team lied about said bounty program</p>
<p>3. You admit the team should be punished but,</p>
<p>then you embellish by making unsustantiated statements like or along the lines of :</p>
<p>a. &#8220;Everybody else is doing it&#8221; &#8211; you have no proof that&#8217;s true</p>
<p>b. You implicate another team (NY Giants) for what exactly? &#8211; injuring  a player (didn&#8217;t happen), threatening to injure a player (try again).</p>
<p>Then you conclude, &#8220;Where is the justice?&#8221;  Wow!  Talk about making us all a little dumber with those arguments.  Your arguments so pathetic they don&#8217;t really deserve comment.  I think we all know how this is going to end.  There is going to be a leak about the whistleblower.  Saints fans are going to villify that person for telling the truth.  Then the media is going to expose every mistake that person has ever made sense the second grade (divorce, kids out of wedlock, shoplifting a pack of gum fom 7-11, etc.) and then only when their character is completely destroyed will Saints fans breathe a sigh of relief.  PATHETIC</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dannersthemanners</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/01/appeals-may-focus-on-disconnect-between-bounties-on-field-actions/#comment-1695530</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[dannersthemanners]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2012 15:14:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=480131#comment-1695530</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Someone broke my window last night. My neighbors said it was aliens from outer space. I asked several neighbors and that’s what they all said. Therefore, by Goodells’ logic, I should levy a year long suspension on aliens and fine anybody that helped the aliens break my window. When the aliens appeal, I will say, “clearly these aliens from outerspace lied to us all.”]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Someone broke my window last night. My neighbors said it was aliens from outer space. I asked several neighbors and that’s what they all said. Therefore, by Goodells’ logic, I should levy a year long suspension on aliens and fine anybody that helped the aliens break my window. When the aliens appeal, I will say, “clearly these aliens from outerspace lied to us all.”</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: notmanning</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/01/appeals-may-focus-on-disconnect-between-bounties-on-field-actions/#comment-1695483</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[notmanning]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2012 14:49:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=480131#comment-1695483</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What is it about a player screaming &quot;Pay me my money!!!&quot; after a kill shot, that is so hard to understand.

If the program were not effective, they would not have organized/implemented/stressed it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What is it about a player screaming &#8220;Pay me my money!!!&#8221; after a kill shot, that is so hard to understand.</p>
<p>If the program were not effective, they would not have organized/implemented/stressed it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: theytukrjobs</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/01/appeals-may-focus-on-disconnect-between-bounties-on-field-actions/#comment-1695371</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[theytukrjobs]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2012 13:55:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=480131#comment-1695371</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There is zero evidence so far saying that other teams were illegally paying their players outside of the CBA for certain actions.  And we know without a doubt that the Saints were the only team questioned in this way on the matter.  

Saints backers and bounty supporters seem to argue that their team should not be punished on the off chance that other teams were doing the same thing?  Since when has that ever been an argument that works?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is zero evidence so far saying that other teams were illegally paying their players outside of the CBA for certain actions.  And we know without a doubt that the Saints were the only team questioned in this way on the matter.  </p>
<p>Saints backers and bounty supporters seem to argue that their team should not be punished on the off chance that other teams were doing the same thing?  Since when has that ever been an argument that works?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sinnermike</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/01/appeals-may-focus-on-disconnect-between-bounties-on-field-actions/#comment-1695252</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[sinnermike]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2012 13:10:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=480131#comment-1695252</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Regarding posters on this site. Your comments are more about dislike for the saints than actual evidence of wrongdoing. There is no inforrmation regarding crippling, or carting off. That was made up in your mind. You are in possession of NO information with which to base your opinion on. Get a grip! Just be straight about it and just comment that you hate the saints and leave it at that.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Regarding posters on this site. Your comments are more about dislike for the saints than actual evidence of wrongdoing. There is no inforrmation regarding crippling, or carting off. That was made up in your mind. You are in possession of NO information with which to base your opinion on. Get a grip! Just be straight about it and just comment that you hate the saints and leave it at that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: musicman495</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/01/appeals-may-focus-on-disconnect-between-bounties-on-field-actions/#comment-1695228</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[musicman495]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2012 13:00:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=480131#comment-1695228</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[According to a source with knowledge of the situation, the appeals may consist of arguments based on the fundamental difference between the placement of “bounties” on players and the actual infliction of injury.  If, in other words, the offer of cash for a “cart-off” didn’t actually result in a player being carted off, the situation arguably becomes a case of intent without a crime.
-----------------------------
There is no question that conspiracy to commit a crime is itself a crime.  No one is saying (certainly I am not) that the Saints are totally innocent.  I am saying that the charges and penalties are completely overblown, and the Saints are being singled out for a shifting standard that the commissioner is artificially creating to cover his backside for the upcoming court cases.  And I believe the league is INTENTIONALLY not investigating the behavior of other teams so no jury will find out just how widespread this behavior has been.

As for those geniuses on this forum who want to move next year&#039;s Super Bowl, or remove the NFL franchise from New Orleans, or give some other team the Lombardi trophy for SB44 because of this, try the decaf.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to a source with knowledge of the situation, the appeals may consist of arguments based on the fundamental difference between the placement of “bounties” on players and the actual infliction of injury.  If, in other words, the offer of cash for a “cart-off” didn’t actually result in a player being carted off, the situation arguably becomes a case of intent without a crime.<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;<br />
There is no question that conspiracy to commit a crime is itself a crime.  No one is saying (certainly I am not) that the Saints are totally innocent.  I am saying that the charges and penalties are completely overblown, and the Saints are being singled out for a shifting standard that the commissioner is artificially creating to cover his backside for the upcoming court cases.  And I believe the league is INTENTIONALLY not investigating the behavior of other teams so no jury will find out just how widespread this behavior has been.</p>
<p>As for those geniuses on this forum who want to move next year&#8217;s Super Bowl, or remove the NFL franchise from New Orleans, or give some other team the Lombardi trophy for SB44 because of this, try the decaf.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: musicman495</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/01/appeals-may-focus-on-disconnect-between-bounties-on-field-actions/#comment-1695220</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[musicman495]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2012 12:53:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=480131#comment-1695220</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[cdkreb says: Apr 1, 2012 11:10 PM

Tell that to Brett Favre and Kurt Warner.
------------------
Once more for those with special needs - the hit on Warner after the interception in 2009 was a COMPLETELY LEGAL hit - the type of hit defensive players have been making on QB&#039;s after interceptions for 50+ years.  Not in dispute, even from Warner himself.  Thus we are left with one or two disputed calls on one player in one game.  Where is the evidence of a &quot;3 year bounty program&quot;??????]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>cdkreb says: Apr 1, 2012 11:10 PM</p>
<p>Tell that to Brett Favre and Kurt Warner.<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;<br />
Once more for those with special needs &#8211; the hit on Warner after the interception in 2009 was a COMPLETELY LEGAL hit &#8211; the type of hit defensive players have been making on QB&#8217;s after interceptions for 50+ years.  Not in dispute, even from Warner himself.  Thus we are left with one or two disputed calls on one player in one game.  Where is the evidence of a &#8220;3 year bounty program&#8221;??????</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: crabboil</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/01/appeals-may-focus-on-disconnect-between-bounties-on-field-actions/#comment-1695197</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[crabboil]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2012 12:36:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=480131#comment-1695197</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[electionconfidential says: Apr 2, 2012 6:15 AM

I just saw a replay of the Saints / Panthers game from last year. There was a bounty on Cam Newton. Just while I was watching there were two roughing the passer calls and one of those was a blatant helmet to helmet hit. You can’t tell me these bounties were somehow meaningless…


________________

The call on Turk McBride for roughing Cam Newton was complete garbage, but we won&#039;t talk about that.  We&#039;ll just chalk it up as more &quot;evidence&quot; against the Saints.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>electionconfidential says: Apr 2, 2012 6:15 AM</p>
<p>I just saw a replay of the Saints / Panthers game from last year. There was a bounty on Cam Newton. Just while I was watching there were two roughing the passer calls and one of those was a blatant helmet to helmet hit. You can’t tell me these bounties were somehow meaningless…</p>
<p>________________</p>
<p>The call on Turk McBride for roughing Cam Newton was complete garbage, but we won&#8217;t talk about that.  We&#8217;ll just chalk it up as more &#8220;evidence&#8221; against the Saints.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: drunkenjunk</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/01/appeals-may-focus-on-disconnect-between-bounties-on-field-actions/#comment-1695166</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[drunkenjunk]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2012 12:17:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=480131#comment-1695166</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hey WoodyG, you&#039;re an idiot. Go back to whatever backwoods hole you climbed out of.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey WoodyG, you&#8217;re an idiot. Go back to whatever backwoods hole you climbed out of.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gimmeabruschi</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/01/appeals-may-focus-on-disconnect-between-bounties-on-field-actions/#comment-1695159</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[gimmeabruschi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2012 12:12:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=480131#comment-1695159</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The act of appealing this just punishment does not show contrition for the acts committed. If there is no contrition then the prospects for future transgressions are obvious. There is no lesson learned here. Ban him for life and let him appeal that.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The act of appealing this just punishment does not show contrition for the acts committed. If there is no contrition then the prospects for future transgressions are obvious. There is no lesson learned here. Ban him for life and let him appeal that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thereisalwaysnextyear</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/01/appeals-may-focus-on-disconnect-between-bounties-on-field-actions/#comment-1695141</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[thereisalwaysnextyear]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2012 11:56:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=480131#comment-1695141</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Intent vs crime?  So it&#039;s ok if you hold up a store as long as you don&#039;t get any money?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Intent vs crime?  So it&#8217;s ok if you hold up a store as long as you don&#8217;t get any money?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lawyermalloy</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/01/appeals-may-focus-on-disconnect-between-bounties-on-field-actions/#comment-1695100</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[lawyermalloy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2012 11:14:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=480131#comment-1695100</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;the offer of cash for a “cart-off” didn’t actually result in a player being carted off, the situation arguably becomes a case of intent without a crime.&quot;
This is not correct!
If 2 or more people conspired to commit assault on another, depending on what &quot;overt acts&quot; took place in furtherence of the conspiracy, a crime DID take place regardless of whether an injury ever occured!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;the offer of cash for a “cart-off” didn’t actually result in a player being carted off, the situation arguably becomes a case of intent without a crime.&#8221;<br />
This is not correct!<br />
If 2 or more people conspired to commit assault on another, depending on what &#8220;overt acts&#8221; took place in furtherence of the conspiracy, a crime DID take place regardless of whether an injury ever occured!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: robf2010</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/01/appeals-may-focus-on-disconnect-between-bounties-on-field-actions/#comment-1695091</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[robf2010]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2012 10:54:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=480131#comment-1695091</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;Uuhhhh….. The Giants weren’t paying each other to go after Williams. Do you understand what a “bounty” is?&quot;

So it&#039;s OK to try to knock a player out as long as you don&#039;t have a pool?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Uuhhhh….. The Giants weren’t paying each other to go after Williams. Do you understand what a “bounty” is?&#8221;</p>
<p>So it&#8217;s OK to try to knock a player out as long as you don&#8217;t have a pool?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: robf2010</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/01/appeals-may-focus-on-disconnect-between-bounties-on-field-actions/#comment-1695090</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[robf2010]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2012 10:52:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=480131#comment-1695090</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;I just saw a replay of the Saints / Panthers game from last year. There was a bounty on Cam Newton. Just while I was watching there were two roughing the passer calls and one of those was a blatant helmet to helmet hit.&quot;

No one is saying the Saints are angels.  The Saints had 9 penalties for 82 yards in that game.  Panthers had 7 for 65 yards.  Close division games are always chippy.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I just saw a replay of the Saints / Panthers game from last year. There was a bounty on Cam Newton. Just while I was watching there were two roughing the passer calls and one of those was a blatant helmet to helmet hit.&#8221;</p>
<p>No one is saying the Saints are angels.  The Saints had 9 penalties for 82 yards in that game.  Panthers had 7 for 65 yards.  Close division games are always chippy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: robf2010</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/01/appeals-may-focus-on-disconnect-between-bounties-on-field-actions/#comment-1695085</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[robf2010]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2012 10:40:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=480131#comment-1695085</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;B.S. I could be on a highway with 9000 other cars going over the speed limit. If Officer Friendly puts his lights on behind me, I’m still the one who’s paying the ticket.&quot;

The problem with that analogy is that Officer Friendly can only pull one car over.  Officer Goodell can pull ALL 9000 other cars over.  He&#039;s choosing not to.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;B.S. I could be on a highway with 9000 other cars going over the speed limit. If Officer Friendly puts his lights on behind me, I’m still the one who’s paying the ticket.&#8221;</p>
<p>The problem with that analogy is that Officer Friendly can only pull one car over.  Officer Goodell can pull ALL 9000 other cars over.  He&#8217;s choosing not to.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: electionconfidential</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/01/appeals-may-focus-on-disconnect-between-bounties-on-field-actions/#comment-1695081</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[electionconfidential]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2012 10:15:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=480131#comment-1695081</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I just saw a replay of the Saints / Panthers game from last year.  There was a bounty on Cam Newton.  Just while I was watching there were two roughing the passer calls and one of those was a blatant helmet to helmet hit.  You can&#039;t tell me these bounties were somehow meaningless...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just saw a replay of the Saints / Panthers game from last year.  There was a bounty on Cam Newton.  Just while I was watching there were two roughing the passer calls and one of those was a blatant helmet to helmet hit.  You can&#8217;t tell me these bounties were somehow meaningless&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jackm79</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/01/appeals-may-focus-on-disconnect-between-bounties-on-field-actions/#comment-1695071</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jackm79]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2012 08:01:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=480131#comment-1695071</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Uuhhhh..... The Giants weren&#039;t paying each other to go after Williams. Do you understand what a &quot;bounty&quot; is?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Uuhhhh&#8230;.. The Giants weren&#8217;t paying each other to go after Williams. Do you understand what a &#8220;bounty&#8221; is?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: keakuamai</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/01/appeals-may-focus-on-disconnect-between-bounties-on-field-actions/#comment-1695067</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[keakuamai]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2012 07:33:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=480131#comment-1695067</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If this is a ply simply to buy time while they get their ducks in a row, fine, but if it&#039;s an actual for real appeal, the real question is, did they know this was going on (yes they already admitted it) and did they stop when they were told (nope they admitted that too) and then lie about it when asked?

The other factor here is that I agree with quite a few folks I&#039;ve spoken to that the saints won&#039;t learn a thing other than to keep this activity under better wraps.

The real message to the world and rest of the league would have been to dismantle the team but that&#039;s not realistic and wouldn&#039;t be fair to the investors, the citizens of NO and fans.

This should be a progressive disciplinary process and if they really want to move forward, they take their lumps, and put it behind them.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If this is a ply simply to buy time while they get their ducks in a row, fine, but if it&#8217;s an actual for real appeal, the real question is, did they know this was going on (yes they already admitted it) and did they stop when they were told (nope they admitted that too) and then lie about it when asked?</p>
<p>The other factor here is that I agree with quite a few folks I&#8217;ve spoken to that the saints won&#8217;t learn a thing other than to keep this activity under better wraps.</p>
<p>The real message to the world and rest of the league would have been to dismantle the team but that&#8217;s not realistic and wouldn&#8217;t be fair to the investors, the citizens of NO and fans.</p>
<p>This should be a progressive disciplinary process and if they really want to move forward, they take their lumps, and put it behind them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: daknight93</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/01/appeals-may-focus-on-disconnect-between-bounties-on-field-actions/#comment-1695066</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[daknight93]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2012 07:16:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=480131#comment-1695066</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[the nfl is a joke and roger goodell has formed the new national flag football league...A new world order is here: hard hitting tackling is a criminal offense, hard hitting tackling is unacceptable and is banned...Goodell says, I am creating a new culture in football...NFFL, new world order in football...yuck!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the nfl is a joke and roger goodell has formed the new national flag football league&#8230;A new world order is here: hard hitting tackling is a criminal offense, hard hitting tackling is unacceptable and is banned&#8230;Goodell says, I am creating a new culture in football&#8230;NFFL, new world order in football&#8230;yuck!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: terrygca</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/01/appeals-may-focus-on-disconnect-between-bounties-on-field-actions/#comment-1695056</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[terrygca]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2012 06:26:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=480131#comment-1695056</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[They weight of the punishment is for the cover up; not the crime.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They weight of the punishment is for the cover up; not the crime.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: djaehne</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/01/appeals-may-focus-on-disconnect-between-bounties-on-field-actions/#comment-1695049</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[djaehne]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2012 06:13:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=480131#comment-1695049</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This sounds like a hollywood movie....a story with no substance, just an outcome.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This sounds like a hollywood movie&#8230;.a story with no substance, just an outcome.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: purplegreenandgold</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/01/appeals-may-focus-on-disconnect-between-bounties-on-field-actions/#comment-1695048</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[purplegreenandgold]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2012 06:13:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=480131#comment-1695048</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[woodyg says: Apr 1, 2012 11:39 PM

Once again …..

This goes to once again prove that the punishment for ‘bountygate’ should have been a complete dismantling of the New Orleans franchise. A player/coach dispersal draft would have exiled the guilty to a defunct career ending. The SuperDome would have been torn down. All written mention of a team named the Saints would have been removed from NFL history. Any conversation of a Saint’s football team in public would be deemed illegal by Congress. It would be like the Saints never existed.

Instead of “Who Dat”, it would be “Where Dat.”
====================================
hey cheech-i thought u quit chokin on that stuff]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>woodyg says: Apr 1, 2012 11:39 PM</p>
<p>Once again …..</p>
<p>This goes to once again prove that the punishment for ‘bountygate’ should have been a complete dismantling of the New Orleans franchise. A player/coach dispersal draft would have exiled the guilty to a defunct career ending. The SuperDome would have been torn down. All written mention of a team named the Saints would have been removed from NFL history. Any conversation of a Saint’s football team in public would be deemed illegal by Congress. It would be like the Saints never existed.</p>
<p>Instead of “Who Dat”, it would be “Where Dat.”<br />
====================================<br />
hey cheech-i thought u quit chokin on that stuff</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: genericuser8888</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/01/appeals-may-focus-on-disconnect-between-bounties-on-field-actions/#comment-1695047</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[genericuser8888]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2012 06:13:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=480131#comment-1695047</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The question Goodell asked himself:

How do you punish a team for things that on-field referees saw no clear evidence of (intent to injure) and seem to have had few results (the bounty program)? 

The answer he thought up:

Give out the harshest punishment in the history of the NFL.  


What he should have asked himself, and what is a much bigger problem that&#039;s gotten lost in all this:

If the Saints are running a bounty program, why, over the course of 3 years of investigation and about 50+ games (including playoff runs), were we not able to find/see it more clearly?  

It seems like the NFL has an oversight problem.  THIS should be the real story.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The question Goodell asked himself:</p>
<p>How do you punish a team for things that on-field referees saw no clear evidence of (intent to injure) and seem to have had few results (the bounty program)? </p>
<p>The answer he thought up:</p>
<p>Give out the harshest punishment in the history of the NFL.  </p>
<p>What he should have asked himself, and what is a much bigger problem that&#8217;s gotten lost in all this:</p>
<p>If the Saints are running a bounty program, why, over the course of 3 years of investigation and about 50+ games (including playoff runs), were we not able to find/see it more clearly?  </p>
<p>It seems like the NFL has an oversight problem.  THIS should be the real story.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tbtrojan</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/01/appeals-may-focus-on-disconnect-between-bounties-on-field-actions/#comment-1695045</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[tbtrojan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2012 06:07:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=480131#comment-1695045</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So just because they weren&#039;t good enough to actually collect on the payments there was nothing wrong with what they did?
Knocking a guy out of the game is not against the rules by itself, having the intention of knocking a guy out for an unreported bonus (Salary cap and IRS issues) is. Even if those payments were never collected it holds salary cap issues because they would count as a LTBE bonus.

People get locked up for attempted murder all the time because the intent was bad enough. Charles Manson never actually killed a person but he&#039;s been locked up for many a year now.

Throw in that they lied multiple times firect to Goodells face about doing it and they deserve everything they get]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So just because they weren&#8217;t good enough to actually collect on the payments there was nothing wrong with what they did?<br />
Knocking a guy out of the game is not against the rules by itself, having the intention of knocking a guy out for an unreported bonus (Salary cap and IRS issues) is. Even if those payments were never collected it holds salary cap issues because they would count as a LTBE bonus.</p>
<p>People get locked up for attempted murder all the time because the intent was bad enough. Charles Manson never actually killed a person but he&#8217;s been locked up for many a year now.</p>
<p>Throw in that they lied multiple times firect to Goodells face about doing it and they deserve everything they get</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: consolecomplaints</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/01/appeals-may-focus-on-disconnect-between-bounties-on-field-actions/#comment-1695044</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[consolecomplaints]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2012 05:57:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=480131#comment-1695044</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Who else has the gonads to call an onside kick in the middle of the Superbowl?  

Nobody.

That&#039;s why we need Sean Payton in football.  You don&#039;t get that sort of entertainment from any other coach.  

Punish him, sure, but at least let him come back in time for the playoff run.  After all, I&#039;m sure the biggest punishment would be for him to come back just in time to lose to Seattle again in round one.  

I think Vikings fans would rather see him lose than sit out.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who else has the gonads to call an onside kick in the middle of the Superbowl?  </p>
<p>Nobody.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s why we need Sean Payton in football.  You don&#8217;t get that sort of entertainment from any other coach.  </p>
<p>Punish him, sure, but at least let him come back in time for the playoff run.  After all, I&#8217;m sure the biggest punishment would be for him to come back just in time to lose to Seattle again in round one.  </p>
<p>I think Vikings fans would rather see him lose than sit out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: genericuser8888</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/01/appeals-may-focus-on-disconnect-between-bounties-on-field-actions/#comment-1695043</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[genericuser8888]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2012 05:53:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=480131#comment-1695043</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[To all those that accuse the Saints of cheating, what did they cheat at, sucking on defense?

If they had an illegal incentive program, it was an utter failure.   Their D has been horrible under the entire Greg Williams reign.  

A few thoughts...

1.  there is no long list of injured players due to the bounty program.  

2.  Apparently the worst thing the &quot;bounty&quot; program managed to do was knock a 42 year old quarterback (Farve) out of a game for one or two plays.    

3. The only reason they won the superbowl in 2009 was because they had a high turnover ratio (thanks to Darren Sharper and Tracy Porter).  Once Sharper had knee surgery in the offseason and did not come back at 100%, the Greg Williams &quot;blitz package&quot; defense was shown to be an utter failure.  

4. Some teams WITHOUT bounty programs were more penalized for roughing penalties than the Saints were WITH one.  

The Saints deserve to be punished for lying to the league and having a bounty program.  True.  Their championship does not deserve an asterisk.  They won by putting up 38+ points a game and getting turnovers, not by injuring people.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To all those that accuse the Saints of cheating, what did they cheat at, sucking on defense?</p>
<p>If they had an illegal incentive program, it was an utter failure.   Their D has been horrible under the entire Greg Williams reign.  </p>
<p>A few thoughts&#8230;</p>
<p>1.  there is no long list of injured players due to the bounty program.  </p>
<p>2.  Apparently the worst thing the &#8220;bounty&#8221; program managed to do was knock a 42 year old quarterback (Farve) out of a game for one or two plays.    </p>
<p>3. The only reason they won the superbowl in 2009 was because they had a high turnover ratio (thanks to Darren Sharper and Tracy Porter).  Once Sharper had knee surgery in the offseason and did not come back at 100%, the Greg Williams &#8220;blitz package&#8221; defense was shown to be an utter failure.  </p>
<p>4. Some teams WITHOUT bounty programs were more penalized for roughing penalties than the Saints were WITH one.  </p>
<p>The Saints deserve to be punished for lying to the league and having a bounty program.  True.  Their championship does not deserve an asterisk.  They won by putting up 38+ points a game and getting turnovers, not by injuring people.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: xenova1</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/01/appeals-may-focus-on-disconnect-between-bounties-on-field-actions/#comment-1695038</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[xenova1]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2012 05:14:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=480131#comment-1695038</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I hope the owners can look beyond this case and see the glaring problem that is being revealed by this case.  There is a problem when one entity is both the executive and judicial branches.  Der Kommisar is more like the Der Fuhrer.  

Players know when they appeal a fine for unsportsmanlike conduct, there isn&#039;t a chance in hell that the fine will be either reduced or removed.

I think there should be a panel made up of judges representing the Owners, the League Office,  the NFLPA and an unbiased 3rd party who will review all appeals brought forth by teams and players.  They will look at each case without bias and refer to prior precedences in evaluating the outcome.  

Exactly what rule or prior cases was the extent of the Saints&#039; punishment determined?  It seemed to have been determined by one man hell-bent on making his point.

The Saints may be guilty as hell but to let the executer of the rules to also be the judge and jury is absurd.  Hopefully the owners can do something to correct the unbalanced powers between the league, teams, and players.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hope the owners can look beyond this case and see the glaring problem that is being revealed by this case.  There is a problem when one entity is both the executive and judicial branches.  Der Kommisar is more like the Der Fuhrer.  </p>
<p>Players know when they appeal a fine for unsportsmanlike conduct, there isn&#8217;t a chance in hell that the fine will be either reduced or removed.</p>
<p>I think there should be a panel made up of judges representing the Owners, the League Office,  the NFLPA and an unbiased 3rd party who will review all appeals brought forth by teams and players.  They will look at each case without bias and refer to prior precedences in evaluating the outcome.  </p>
<p>Exactly what rule or prior cases was the extent of the Saints&#8217; punishment determined?  It seemed to have been determined by one man hell-bent on making his point.</p>
<p>The Saints may be guilty as hell but to let the executer of the rules to also be the judge and jury is absurd.  Hopefully the owners can do something to correct the unbalanced powers between the league, teams, and players.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: paulitik74</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/01/appeals-may-focus-on-disconnect-between-bounties-on-field-actions/#comment-1695033</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[paulitik74]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2012 04:59:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=480131#comment-1695033</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Saints fans need to be groveling at Goodell&#039;s feet and thank him that this is all they got. The Saints were allowed for 3 years to get away with bounties, paying felons to do their logistics, and stealing prescription drugs, with no punishment except a &quot;hey, stop doing that&quot;. In arrogant defiance, the corrupt Saints organization thumbed their nose at the NFL exploiting the feelings and goodwill  of the media and the NFL to protect &quot;America&#039;s Darlings&quot; after Katrina. 

The Saints were given a 4th strike, a 5th down, and now they are crying and playing the victim. Threatening Goodell and hoping to embarrass him when he comes to New Orleans next February. Keep it up Saints fans, it will only make the decision of which team to ship to Los Angeles much easier.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Saints fans need to be groveling at Goodell&#8217;s feet and thank him that this is all they got. The Saints were allowed for 3 years to get away with bounties, paying felons to do their logistics, and stealing prescription drugs, with no punishment except a &#8220;hey, stop doing that&#8221;. In arrogant defiance, the corrupt Saints organization thumbed their nose at the NFL exploiting the feelings and goodwill  of the media and the NFL to protect &#8220;America&#8217;s Darlings&#8221; after Katrina. </p>
<p>The Saints were given a 4th strike, a 5th down, and now they are crying and playing the victim. Threatening Goodell and hoping to embarrass him when he comes to New Orleans next February. Keep it up Saints fans, it will only make the decision of which team to ship to Los Angeles much easier.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: all32</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/01/appeals-may-focus-on-disconnect-between-bounties-on-field-actions/#comment-1695031</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[all32]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2012 04:56:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=480131#comment-1695031</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Appeals may focus on disconnect between bounties, on-field actions. 

Don&#039;t you mean - Appeals my focus on &quot;disconnecting&quot; an opponents head from its body on the field of action.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Appeals may focus on disconnect between bounties, on-field actions. </p>
<p>Don&#8217;t you mean &#8211; Appeals my focus on &#8220;disconnecting&#8221; an opponents head from its body on the field of action.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
