<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Tannehill could give Vikings trade leverage</title>
	<atom:link href="http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/01/tannehill-could-give-vikings-trade-leverage/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/01/tannehill-could-give-vikings-trade-leverage/</link>
	<description>ProFootballTalk on NBCSports.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 04:42:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: jamesnieman</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/01/tannehill-could-give-vikings-trade-leverage/#comment-1696957</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jamesnieman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2012 01:21:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=477521#comment-1696957</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Np player is really a reach until he has played in the nfl  for a least 4 years.  Yes we can sit here and speculate on players who the so called experts call reaches and steals, but if Ponder ends up being the next Payton Manning is he still a reach?  In my opinion the answer is NO he would have been a steal and a player like N. Fairly who everyone was calling a steal for the lions ends up being a bust then he would be a reach and not a steal]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Np player is really a reach until he has played in the nfl  for a least 4 years.  Yes we can sit here and speculate on players who the so called experts call reaches and steals, but if Ponder ends up being the next Payton Manning is he still a reach?  In my opinion the answer is NO he would have been a steal and a player like N. Fairly who everyone was calling a steal for the lions ends up being a bust then he would be a reach and not a steal</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jlawless87</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/01/tannehill-could-give-vikings-trade-leverage/#comment-1696094</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jlawless87]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2012 18:32:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=477521#comment-1696094</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[khmer379: &quot;Ponder is not a reach yea he was pick kinda high&quot;

__________________________________________

That would be the definition of a &quot;reach&quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>khmer379: &#8220;Ponder is not a reach yea he was pick kinda high&#8221;</p>
<p>__________________________________________</p>
<p>That would be the definition of a &#8220;reach&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: noross</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/01/tannehill-could-give-vikings-trade-leverage/#comment-1695777</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[noross]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2012 16:50:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=477521#comment-1695777</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hey hikohadon, &quot;Speaking of points, I’m pretty sure you missed mine.&quot;

Again, you are talking about Tannehill! Who gives a rats ass about Tannehill. The point I will continue to make is the completely inept organization that is the Dolphins! THEY NEED A QB!!!! NOT TANNEHILL!!! NOT  THE 3rd RATED QB, who was a 2nd rounder until recently!!! God knows the Dolphins have gone through enough of them!!!Trade up to the top of the draft &amp; get one after all these years, or we will still be talking about this in another 13 years!!! YOU KEEP MISSING THE POINT!!!!!!!!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey hikohadon, &#8220;Speaking of points, I’m pretty sure you missed mine.&#8221;</p>
<p>Again, you are talking about Tannehill! Who gives a rats ass about Tannehill. The point I will continue to make is the completely inept organization that is the Dolphins! THEY NEED A QB!!!! NOT TANNEHILL!!! NOT  THE 3rd RATED QB, who was a 2nd rounder until recently!!! God knows the Dolphins have gone through enough of them!!!Trade up to the top of the draft &amp; get one after all these years, or we will still be talking about this in another 13 years!!! YOU KEEP MISSING THE POINT!!!!!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: purplepridehasadownside</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/01/tannehill-could-give-vikings-trade-leverage/#comment-1695636</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[purplepridehasadownside]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2012 16:15:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=477521#comment-1695636</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Not to worry, Vikings Nation, I have no doubt that Mr. Speilman will screw this draft all the way up...Skol!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not to worry, Vikings Nation, I have no doubt that Mr. Speilman will screw this draft all the way up&#8230;Skol!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: applecool1981</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/01/tannehill-could-give-vikings-trade-leverage/#comment-1695210</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[applecool1981]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2012 12:44:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=477521#comment-1695210</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[jamesnieman says: Apr 1, 2012 6:11 PM

Applecool: my point was if a organization thinks a QB is their franchise QB u get him no matter what like jets and Redskins did when trading up and like the VIKINGS did when selecting Ponder while everyone else was screaming REACH

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Gotcha. That is true; if you&#039;re probably not going to be able to select that player with your next pick and can&#039;t get a good trade deal to make it worth trading down and selecting him, then yes, you have to do it. I&#039;m not saying that Tim Tebow is a good or will ever be a good QB but teams were expecting him to go in the second round and a team traded up into the 1st, just a few picks after they selected a play and grabbed him; if he&#039;s the guy that you believe in and there&#039;s no value for any other player that you could select, then what choice do you have but to do it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>jamesnieman says: Apr 1, 2012 6:11 PM</p>
<p>Applecool: my point was if a organization thinks a QB is their franchise QB u get him no matter what like jets and Redskins did when trading up and like the VIKINGS did when selecting Ponder while everyone else was screaming REACH</p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;</p>
<p>Gotcha. That is true; if you&#8217;re probably not going to be able to select that player with your next pick and can&#8217;t get a good trade deal to make it worth trading down and selecting him, then yes, you have to do it. I&#8217;m not saying that Tim Tebow is a good or will ever be a good QB but teams were expecting him to go in the second round and a team traded up into the 1st, just a few picks after they selected a play and grabbed him; if he&#8217;s the guy that you believe in and there&#8217;s no value for any other player that you could select, then what choice do you have but to do it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mrslay1</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/01/tannehill-could-give-vikings-trade-leverage/#comment-1695184</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[mrslay1]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2012 12:30:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=477521#comment-1695184</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Anyone taking Tannehill in this draft is wasting a pick. He will never play in this league.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anyone taking Tannehill in this draft is wasting a pick. He will never play in this league.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: muckfodell</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/01/tannehill-could-give-vikings-trade-leverage/#comment-1695072</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[muckfodell]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2012 08:26:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=477521#comment-1695072</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Not a chance in Hell the Browns trade up to get him.

None. Zero.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not a chance in Hell the Browns trade up to get him.</p>
<p>None. Zero.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cluelessdufus</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/01/tannehill-could-give-vikings-trade-leverage/#comment-1695035</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[cluelessdufus]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2012 05:06:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=477521#comment-1695035</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Vikings fan here and I think getting that extra pick [third rounder] would be awesome but Ponder still needs to show something so the vikings are bluffing]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Vikings fan here and I think getting that extra pick [third rounder] would be awesome but Ponder still needs to show something so the vikings are bluffing</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hikohadon</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/01/tannehill-could-give-vikings-trade-leverage/#comment-1694972</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[hikohadon]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2012 03:41:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=477521#comment-1694972</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;If you think Richardson is the draft answer for the Browns look at Peterson with the Vikings last year. He was great but they were still awful. If your team does not have strong play from the QB position you have little hope.&quot;
________________

True.  But what use is picking a QB if that QB doesn&#039;t solve your problems?  You gonna take Kirk Cousins at #10 overall just b/c he&#039;s a QB?

And ask yourself this:  If your team was sitting at #4 and both Adrian Peterson and Christian Ponder were available, which one would you take?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;If you think Richardson is the draft answer for the Browns look at Peterson with the Vikings last year. He was great but they were still awful. If your team does not have strong play from the QB position you have little hope.&#8221;<br />
________________</p>
<p>True.  But what use is picking a QB if that QB doesn&#8217;t solve your problems?  You gonna take Kirk Cousins at #10 overall just b/c he&#8217;s a QB?</p>
<p>And ask yourself this:  If your team was sitting at #4 and both Adrian Peterson and Christian Ponder were available, which one would you take?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hikohadon</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/01/tannehill-could-give-vikings-trade-leverage/#comment-1694967</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[hikohadon]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2012 03:37:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=477521#comment-1694967</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;Hey hikohadon, “They had Tannehill last year when his name was Chad Henne.”

You just made my point! Time to finally get a QB. And his name is not Tannehill! Do what good franchises do, trade up to get the highest rated Quarterbacks! Or should we wait another 13 years?
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!&quot;
__________________

Speaking of points, I&#039;m pretty sure you missed mine.  Yes, both Miami and Cleveland need to FINALLY get THE QB.  But just because Tannehill is the highest rated QB left on the board does not make him THE QB.  In Miami or Cleveland, Tannehill will have a lot of pressure to play right away on bad teams with limited weapons.  

I don&#039;t feel that will be a good situation for a developmental guy like Tannehill, and if you&#039;re taking him that high in the 1st round, if he doesn&#039;t work out (which I think is more than likely with those 2 teams), then he sets that team back another 3-4 years.

Both fanbases are desperate to have their QB problems solved, but you only have to look back to last year&#039;s draft to see that reaching for a QB isn&#039;t necessarily a solution.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Hey hikohadon, “They had Tannehill last year when his name was Chad Henne.”</p>
<p>You just made my point! Time to finally get a QB. And his name is not Tannehill! Do what good franchises do, trade up to get the highest rated Quarterbacks! Or should we wait another 13 years?<br />
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!&#8221;<br />
__________________</p>
<p>Speaking of points, I&#8217;m pretty sure you missed mine.  Yes, both Miami and Cleveland need to FINALLY get THE QB.  But just because Tannehill is the highest rated QB left on the board does not make him THE QB.  In Miami or Cleveland, Tannehill will have a lot of pressure to play right away on bad teams with limited weapons.  </p>
<p>I don&#8217;t feel that will be a good situation for a developmental guy like Tannehill, and if you&#8217;re taking him that high in the 1st round, if he doesn&#8217;t work out (which I think is more than likely with those 2 teams), then he sets that team back another 3-4 years.</p>
<p>Both fanbases are desperate to have their QB problems solved, but you only have to look back to last year&#8217;s draft to see that reaching for a QB isn&#8217;t necessarily a solution.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kingfish4242</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/01/tannehill-could-give-vikings-trade-leverage/#comment-1694826</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[kingfish4242]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2012 01:56:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=477521#comment-1694826</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[note to self. make sure you&#039;re completely awake after your nap before posting lol.

Although not a huge need in Stl. it&#039;s going to be hard to pass on Trent Richardson. Steven Jackson isn&#039;t a spring chick anymore and the injury bug has been plaguing him recently. In either case, I stand by my original point and say Tannehill will be available at 8 when the Phins pick.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>note to self. make sure you&#8217;re completely awake after your nap before posting lol.</p>
<p>Although not a huge need in Stl. it&#8217;s going to be hard to pass on Trent Richardson. Steven Jackson isn&#8217;t a spring chick anymore and the injury bug has been plaguing him recently. In either case, I stand by my original point and say Tannehill will be available at 8 when the Phins pick.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kingfish4242</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/01/tannehill-could-give-vikings-trade-leverage/#comment-1694779</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[kingfish4242]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2012 01:31:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=477521#comment-1694779</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[cont. Reif is also a good example of why good tackles can be found later. Kalill is a stud,but Reif isn&#039;t chopped liver and is a viable trade down possibility.

My gut feeling just says the team that passes on Claiborne is going to regret it later. I&#039;m not a LSU fan and say this without any bias.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>cont. Reif is also a good example of why good tackles can be found later. Kalill is a stud,but Reif isn&#8217;t chopped liver and is a viable trade down possibility.</p>
<p>My gut feeling just says the team that passes on Claiborne is going to regret it later. I&#8217;m not a LSU fan and say this without any bias.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kingfish4242</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/01/tannehill-could-give-vikings-trade-leverage/#comment-1694769</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[kingfish4242]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2012 01:27:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=477521#comment-1694769</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[phinfan says:
Apr 1, 2012 9:08 PM
I hope miami trades up to get blackmon. We need a big wr since we got rid of Bmarsh. Allot of people seem to forget that right now and there are two big wr’s going in the top 10. Then typical ireland can get his qb in the 2nd (osweiler). Win-win. Of course I’d like Tannehill… but… not ireland


-----------------------------------------------

It doesn&#039;t matter if you have a stud Wr. if you don&#039;t have someone throwing him the ball. Think Moss in Oakland and Steve Smith in Carolina prior to Newton.

If the Dolphins want Tannehill,just sit tight and he&#039;s likely there when you guys select at #8

I&#039;m not saying I&#039;d draft exactly like this,but I see it falling this way

Indy- Andrew Luck
Wash- RG3
Minny- Matt Kalill
Cleveland- Justin Blackmon
Tampa- Mo. Claiborne
Stl- Michael Floyd- probably too early,but the 2nd best after Blackmon.
Jacks- Reily Reif- Like the above poster says,don&#039;t be shocked if he turns out just as good as Kalill

Dolphins- Tannehill.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>phinfan says:<br />
Apr 1, 2012 9:08 PM<br />
I hope miami trades up to get blackmon. We need a big wr since we got rid of Bmarsh. Allot of people seem to forget that right now and there are two big wr’s going in the top 10. Then typical ireland can get his qb in the 2nd (osweiler). Win-win. Of course I’d like Tannehill… but… not ireland</p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;</p>
<p>It doesn&#8217;t matter if you have a stud Wr. if you don&#8217;t have someone throwing him the ball. Think Moss in Oakland and Steve Smith in Carolina prior to Newton.</p>
<p>If the Dolphins want Tannehill,just sit tight and he&#8217;s likely there when you guys select at #8</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not saying I&#8217;d draft exactly like this,but I see it falling this way</p>
<p>Indy- Andrew Luck<br />
Wash- RG3<br />
Minny- Matt Kalill<br />
Cleveland- Justin Blackmon<br />
Tampa- Mo. Claiborne<br />
Stl- Michael Floyd- probably too early,but the 2nd best after Blackmon.<br />
Jacks- Reily Reif- Like the above poster says,don&#8217;t be shocked if he turns out just as good as Kalill</p>
<p>Dolphins- Tannehill.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: phinfan</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/01/tannehill-could-give-vikings-trade-leverage/#comment-1694740</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[phinfan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2012 01:08:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=477521#comment-1694740</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I hope miami trades up to get blackmon. We need a big wr since we got rid of Bmarsh. Allot of people seem to forget that right now and there are two big wr&#039;s going in the top 10. Then typical ireland can get his qb in the 2nd (osweiler). Win-win. Of course I&#039;d like Tannehill... but... not ireland]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hope miami trades up to get blackmon. We need a big wr since we got rid of Bmarsh. Allot of people seem to forget that right now and there are two big wr&#8217;s going in the top 10. Then typical ireland can get his qb in the 2nd (osweiler). Win-win. Of course I&#8217;d like Tannehill&#8230; but&#8230; not ireland</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: phinfan</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/01/tannehill-could-give-vikings-trade-leverage/#comment-1694732</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[phinfan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2012 01:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=477521#comment-1694732</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Whos the browns star running back??? I would say a RB goes at 4 for browns. Unless then get benson.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whos the browns star running back??? I would say a RB goes at 4 for browns. Unless then get benson.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cornersss</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/01/tannehill-could-give-vikings-trade-leverage/#comment-1694653</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[cornersss]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2012 00:23:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=477521#comment-1694653</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If they didnt trade up for rg3,neither will trade up for a qb who wont take a snap this year.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If they didnt trade up for rg3,neither will trade up for a qb who wont take a snap this year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zn0rseman</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/01/tannehill-could-give-vikings-trade-leverage/#comment-1694624</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[zn0rseman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Apr 2012 23:56:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=477521#comment-1694624</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It doesn&#039;t matter what we fans think of Tannehill.  

However of the Browns want Tannehill, it would be stupid of them to not trade with the Vikings to make sure they get him.  For those of you who right now are crossing your arms in disdain as you read that, think Fantasy Football.  How many times have you passed on the player you really wanted because &quot;it&#039;s too early&quot;, only to have a rival &quot;reach&quot; for said player who lights you up all season long?

That&#039;s why you go get the guys you want, and smile smugly as you&#039;re whipping the tar out of all the nimrods who squealed &quot;REACH!&quot; when got him.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It doesn&#8217;t matter what we fans think of Tannehill.  </p>
<p>However of the Browns want Tannehill, it would be stupid of them to not trade with the Vikings to make sure they get him.  For those of you who right now are crossing your arms in disdain as you read that, think Fantasy Football.  How many times have you passed on the player you really wanted because &#8220;it&#8217;s too early&#8221;, only to have a rival &#8220;reach&#8221; for said player who lights you up all season long?</p>
<p>That&#8217;s why you go get the guys you want, and smile smugly as you&#8217;re whipping the tar out of all the nimrods who squealed &#8220;REACH!&#8221; when got him.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jamesnieman</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/01/tannehill-could-give-vikings-trade-leverage/#comment-1694599</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jamesnieman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Apr 2012 23:41:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=477521#comment-1694599</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Don&#039;t think it will happen but in my opinion best case for the Vikings would be to trade back with the Dolphins.             ( they get their much needed QB) Vikings pick R. Reiff who in my opinion is going to be a probowl LT and picking up something like a 2nd and 3rd this yr or 3rd this yr and 1st next yr.  Maybe even more if Browns, Dolphins,  and Seahawks get into a bidding war.  Getting extra 2nd round picks this yr will be huge for anyteam with he talent in this yrs draft]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t think it will happen but in my opinion best case for the Vikings would be to trade back with the Dolphins.             ( they get their much needed QB) Vikings pick R. Reiff who in my opinion is going to be a probowl LT and picking up something like a 2nd and 3rd this yr or 3rd this yr and 1st next yr.  Maybe even more if Browns, Dolphins,  and Seahawks get into a bidding war.  Getting extra 2nd round picks this yr will be huge for anyteam with he talent in this yrs draft</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jamesnieman</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/01/tannehill-could-give-vikings-trade-leverage/#comment-1694475</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jamesnieman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Apr 2012 22:11:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=477521#comment-1694475</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Applecool:    my point was if a organization thinks a QB is their franchise QB u get him no matter what like jets and Redskins did when trading up and like the VIKINGS did when selecting Ponder while everyone else was screaming REACH]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Applecool:    my point was if a organization thinks a QB is their franchise QB u get him no matter what like jets and Redskins did when trading up and like the VIKINGS did when selecting Ponder while everyone else was screaming REACH</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kingfish4242</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/01/tannehill-could-give-vikings-trade-leverage/#comment-1694439</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[kingfish4242]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Apr 2012 21:41:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=477521#comment-1694439</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[theduuuuuuuuuude says:
Apr 1, 2012 4:48 PM
It will be a huge mistake if the Vikings trade the #3 pick to anyone but the Browns at #4. I’m not saying Matt Kalil is a surefire pro bowler, but the offensive line is absolutely atrocious and there aren’t any free agents that look more promising in that LT spot. Claibourne is a sexy pick and the secondary is another desperate need for this team, but you’ve got to shore up that O Line if you want to turn this team around next season and let Ponder develop. If they trade down to the Dolphins or the Seahawks (which both seem improbable if not impossible situations) pick, It will be a disaster, but that would certainly be in keeping with most of the Vikes draft picks over the last five years. Here’s hoping they do the sensible thing and stick with Kalil at #3.



------------------------------------------------

Honestly, I don&#039;t think the Vikes can go wrong either way. The Colts and Skins are taking a far bigger risk Imho. You just don&#039;t know how a Qb is going to work out.

The reason I said I would go with Claiborne was I believe a Shutdown corner is harder to find than a great LT. It was also due to the Wr&#039;s and Qb&#039;s who play in the same division. Historically speaking,you try to build a team to win the division and let the chips fall once the playoffs roll around. The goal for the Vikes right now should be to beat the Lions and Packers. Both of those teams have pro bowl Qb&#039;s and Wr&#039;s. If you don&#039;t have that shutdown corner,your chances of beating them consistently fall drastically.

The Saints won a Sb,with a 4th round pick starting at LT in Jermon Bushrod. In fact,the rest of the line were late rounders as well

LG Carl Nicks- 5th round&#039;

Center- Jonathan Goodwin. - FA, originally a 5th round pick of the Jets.

RG- Jhari Evans- 4th Round

Rt- John Stinchcomb- 2nd round,his replacement is Zach Strief who was a 7th rounder.

My point is good o-linemen can be found later in the draft just like Rb&#039;s. if you want that shutdown corner,be prepared to spend a top 5-10 pick getting him. They are very very rare birds and Claiborne is one.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>theduuuuuuuuuude says:<br />
Apr 1, 2012 4:48 PM<br />
It will be a huge mistake if the Vikings trade the #3 pick to anyone but the Browns at #4. I’m not saying Matt Kalil is a surefire pro bowler, but the offensive line is absolutely atrocious and there aren’t any free agents that look more promising in that LT spot. Claibourne is a sexy pick and the secondary is another desperate need for this team, but you’ve got to shore up that O Line if you want to turn this team around next season and let Ponder develop. If they trade down to the Dolphins or the Seahawks (which both seem improbable if not impossible situations) pick, It will be a disaster, but that would certainly be in keeping with most of the Vikes draft picks over the last five years. Here’s hoping they do the sensible thing and stick with Kalil at #3.</p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;</p>
<p>Honestly, I don&#8217;t think the Vikes can go wrong either way. The Colts and Skins are taking a far bigger risk Imho. You just don&#8217;t know how a Qb is going to work out.</p>
<p>The reason I said I would go with Claiborne was I believe a Shutdown corner is harder to find than a great LT. It was also due to the Wr&#8217;s and Qb&#8217;s who play in the same division. Historically speaking,you try to build a team to win the division and let the chips fall once the playoffs roll around. The goal for the Vikes right now should be to beat the Lions and Packers. Both of those teams have pro bowl Qb&#8217;s and Wr&#8217;s. If you don&#8217;t have that shutdown corner,your chances of beating them consistently fall drastically.</p>
<p>The Saints won a Sb,with a 4th round pick starting at LT in Jermon Bushrod. In fact,the rest of the line were late rounders as well</p>
<p>LG Carl Nicks- 5th round&#8217;</p>
<p>Center- Jonathan Goodwin. &#8211; FA, originally a 5th round pick of the Jets.</p>
<p>RG- Jhari Evans- 4th Round</p>
<p>Rt- John Stinchcomb- 2nd round,his replacement is Zach Strief who was a 7th rounder.</p>
<p>My point is good o-linemen can be found later in the draft just like Rb&#8217;s. if you want that shutdown corner,be prepared to spend a top 5-10 pick getting him. They are very very rare birds and Claiborne is one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cmbkns82</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/01/tannehill-could-give-vikings-trade-leverage/#comment-1694412</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[cmbkns82]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Apr 2012 21:26:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=477521#comment-1694412</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As a fan of a division rival I hope they keep trotting out McCoy instead of drafting Tannehill. In the film I&#039;ve seen he looks promising.

If you think Richardson is the draft answer for the Browns look at Peterson with the Vikings last year. He was great but they were still awful. If your team does not have strong play from the QB position you have little hope. 

YouTube highlights of Tannehill:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5x1D-w9zG1M&amp;feature=youtube_gdata_player]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a fan of a division rival I hope they keep trotting out McCoy instead of drafting Tannehill. In the film I&#8217;ve seen he looks promising.</p>
<p>If you think Richardson is the draft answer for the Browns look at Peterson with the Vikings last year. He was great but they were still awful. If your team does not have strong play from the QB position you have little hope. </p>
<p>YouTube highlights of Tannehill:</p>
<p><span class='embed-youtube' style='text-align:center; display: block;'><iframe class='youtube-player' type='text/html' width='635' height='388' src='http://www.youtube.com/embed/5x1D-w9zG1M?version=3&#038;rel=1&#038;fs=1&#038;showsearch=0&#038;showinfo=1&#038;iv_load_policy=1&#038;wmode=transparent' frameborder='0'></iframe></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: heimerz</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/01/tannehill-could-give-vikings-trade-leverage/#comment-1694405</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[heimerz]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Apr 2012 21:17:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=477521#comment-1694405</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Getting Kalil to keep Ponder from getting killed next year is way more important than any 2nd or 3rd round draft pick. The Vikings better not get too cute and miss their chance to get this guy.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Getting Kalil to keep Ponder from getting killed next year is way more important than any 2nd or 3rd round draft pick. The Vikings better not get too cute and miss their chance to get this guy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: applecool1981</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/01/tannehill-could-give-vikings-trade-leverage/#comment-1694384</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[applecool1981]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Apr 2012 21:02:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=477521#comment-1694384</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If past drafts set a precedent, the going rate for even the Browns to move up from the 4th pick to the third pick would be a second round pick. The Browns wanted Kellen Winslow Jr with their seventh pick in the draft, the year he was becoming a pro; the Bengals had the 6th pick in that draft and were supposedly interested in taking him. They got the Browns to give them their second round pick just to move up to that spot and that spot is less valuable than the third pick in the draft.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If past drafts set a precedent, the going rate for even the Browns to move up from the 4th pick to the third pick would be a second round pick. The Browns wanted Kellen Winslow Jr with their seventh pick in the draft, the year he was becoming a pro; the Bengals had the 6th pick in that draft and were supposedly interested in taking him. They got the Browns to give them their second round pick just to move up to that spot and that spot is less valuable than the third pick in the draft.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: applecool1981</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/01/tannehill-could-give-vikings-trade-leverage/#comment-1694380</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[applecool1981]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Apr 2012 20:57:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=477521#comment-1694380</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[jamesnieman says: Apr 1, 2012 3:06 PM

&quot;Its amuses me reading all u ignorant fans talk about how theirs NOWAY they trade up band draft him. Do you know these GM’s personally? Are you the person calling the shots on draft day? I assume not. These team put a lot of time and effort looking at these players to find out if they fit their programs and if they are their franchise QB. If the Browns really want him and fill like another team will trade up to get him then they WILL trade up, and if the Seahawks or Dolphins really want him and think the Browns will take him at 4 then they will give up a kings ransom to get him! That is the way the NFL works. If u think a guy is your franchise QB u do what u need to do to get him. The Vikings did it with Ponder, the Jaguars did it with Gabbert, the Jets did it with Sanchez, the Redskins just did it with what were assuming is RG3, and teams have been doing it for years. You want someone u go get him nomatter what anyone else thinks bc he’s your guy!!!&quot;

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I don&#039;t think the Vikings traded up to get Ponder; I believe he was taken at 12, their original pick. The Jags only gave a second round pick to move up seven spots to number ten with the Redskins to get Gabbert. They jets also didn&#039;t give up a future 1st round pick to get Sanchez; they fleeced the Brown and their former coach at the time, Eric Mangini. They gave up their original pick, somewhere in the teens, their second, and unimportant players from Mangini&#039;s regime to move up to six I believe it was to draft Sanchez. It was a reach but they didn&#039;t over pay in draft compensation to get him. None of these examples were giving up the farm.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>jamesnieman says: Apr 1, 2012 3:06 PM</p>
<p>&#8220;Its amuses me reading all u ignorant fans talk about how theirs NOWAY they trade up band draft him. Do you know these GM’s personally? Are you the person calling the shots on draft day? I assume not. These team put a lot of time and effort looking at these players to find out if they fit their programs and if they are their franchise QB. If the Browns really want him and fill like another team will trade up to get him then they WILL trade up, and if the Seahawks or Dolphins really want him and think the Browns will take him at 4 then they will give up a kings ransom to get him! That is the way the NFL works. If u think a guy is your franchise QB u do what u need to do to get him. The Vikings did it with Ponder, the Jaguars did it with Gabbert, the Jets did it with Sanchez, the Redskins just did it with what were assuming is RG3, and teams have been doing it for years. You want someone u go get him nomatter what anyone else thinks bc he’s your guy!!!&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think the Vikings traded up to get Ponder; I believe he was taken at 12, their original pick. The Jags only gave a second round pick to move up seven spots to number ten with the Redskins to get Gabbert. They jets also didn&#8217;t give up a future 1st round pick to get Sanchez; they fleeced the Brown and their former coach at the time, Eric Mangini. They gave up their original pick, somewhere in the teens, their second, and unimportant players from Mangini&#8217;s regime to move up to six I believe it was to draft Sanchez. It was a reach but they didn&#8217;t over pay in draft compensation to get him. None of these examples were giving up the farm.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: theduuuuuuuuuude</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/01/tannehill-could-give-vikings-trade-leverage/#comment-1694369</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[theduuuuuuuuuude]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Apr 2012 20:48:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=477521#comment-1694369</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It will be a huge mistake if the Vikings trade the #3 pick to anyone but the Browns at #4. I&#039;m not saying Matt Kalil is a surefire pro bowler, but the offensive line is absolutely atrocious and there aren&#039;t any free agents that look more promising in that LT spot. Claibourne is a sexy pick and the secondary is another desperate need for this team, but you&#039;ve got to shore up that O Line if you want to turn this team around next season and let Ponder develop. If they trade down to the Dolphins or the Seahawks (which both seem improbable if not impossible situations) pick, It will be a disaster, but that would certainly be in keeping with most of the Vikes draft picks over the last five years. Here&#039;s hoping they do the sensible thing and stick with Kalil at #3.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It will be a huge mistake if the Vikings trade the #3 pick to anyone but the Browns at #4. I&#8217;m not saying Matt Kalil is a surefire pro bowler, but the offensive line is absolutely atrocious and there aren&#8217;t any free agents that look more promising in that LT spot. Claibourne is a sexy pick and the secondary is another desperate need for this team, but you&#8217;ve got to shore up that O Line if you want to turn this team around next season and let Ponder develop. If they trade down to the Dolphins or the Seahawks (which both seem improbable if not impossible situations) pick, It will be a disaster, but that would certainly be in keeping with most of the Vikes draft picks over the last five years. Here&#8217;s hoping they do the sensible thing and stick with Kalil at #3.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stavreafavre</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/01/tannehill-could-give-vikings-trade-leverage/#comment-1694351</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[stavreafavre]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Apr 2012 20:32:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=477521#comment-1694351</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A couple of months ago no one would have suggested that Tannehill would go in the first round. A month ago no one would have suggested that he would go in the top ten. A couple of weeks from now we&#039;ll be reading how the Colts are trying to decide between Luck, RG3, and Tannehill. This makes the addle-minded who camp outside for a week to see the hot new movie look level-headed by comparison.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A couple of months ago no one would have suggested that Tannehill would go in the first round. A month ago no one would have suggested that he would go in the top ten. A couple of weeks from now we&#8217;ll be reading how the Colts are trying to decide between Luck, RG3, and Tannehill. This makes the addle-minded who camp outside for a week to see the hot new movie look level-headed by comparison.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ColtMcCowpoke</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/01/tannehill-could-give-vikings-trade-leverage/#comment-1694325</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ColtMcCowpoke]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Apr 2012 20:11:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=477521#comment-1694325</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have a feeling people are going to be storming the gates of Berea no matter who the Browns select in the first round. With Tom Heckert in charge, we could be looking at Melvin Ingram #4 or acquiring Philly&#039;s 6th round picks for the next ten years for our first 1st rounder. 

Leave it to the &quot;offensive gurus&quot; there to sign off on taking defensive players with both first rounders! And thus 13.8 ppg will remain status quo and they will have to peel Colt off the turf with a putty knife.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a feeling people are going to be storming the gates of Berea no matter who the Browns select in the first round. With Tom Heckert in charge, we could be looking at Melvin Ingram #4 or acquiring Philly&#8217;s 6th round picks for the next ten years for our first 1st rounder. </p>
<p>Leave it to the &#8220;offensive gurus&#8221; there to sign off on taking defensive players with both first rounders! And thus 13.8 ppg will remain status quo and they will have to peel Colt off the turf with a putty knife.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: khmer379</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/01/tannehill-could-give-vikings-trade-leverage/#comment-1694296</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[khmer379]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Apr 2012 19:54:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=477521#comment-1694296</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ponder is not a reach yea he was pick kinda high but he can become a good QB gabbert was defineitly a reach especially how he performed last year as for tannehill being a #4 pick is definitly a reach but who knows what the browns GM thinking come draft day]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ponder is not a reach yea he was pick kinda high but he can become a good QB gabbert was defineitly a reach especially how he performed last year as for tannehill being a #4 pick is definitly a reach but who knows what the browns GM thinking come draft day</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: deathtoromo</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/01/tannehill-could-give-vikings-trade-leverage/#comment-1694291</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[deathtoromo]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Apr 2012 19:47:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=477521#comment-1694291</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Holmgren will screw up whatever scenario the Browns decide to go with. Worst front office hire since Vinny Cerrato with the skins. Look at it this way Browns fans, you have a shot at Barkley next year and Holmgren and that sorry staff will be out of Cleveland before he gets there.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Holmgren will screw up whatever scenario the Browns decide to go with. Worst front office hire since Vinny Cerrato with the skins. Look at it this way Browns fans, you have a shot at Barkley next year and Holmgren and that sorry staff will be out of Cleveland before he gets there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KIR</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/01/tannehill-could-give-vikings-trade-leverage/#comment-1694283</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[KIR]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Apr 2012 19:37:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=477521#comment-1694283</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You&#039;ve got to have a Q&#039;B blah, blah, blah. What does Alex Smith, Joe Flaco and T.J. Yates have in common?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;ve got to have a Q&#8217;B blah, blah, blah. What does Alex Smith, Joe Flaco and T.J. Yates have in common?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
