<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Words of wisdom from LaMarr Woodley</title>
	<atom:link href="http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/03/words-of-wisdom-from-lamarr-woodley/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/03/words-of-wisdom-from-lamarr-woodley/</link>
	<description>ProFootballTalk on NBCSports.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 14:41:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: psychosteeler</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/03/words-of-wisdom-from-lamarr-woodley/#comment-1707459</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[psychosteeler]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Apr 2012 03:45:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=485370#comment-1707459</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[wheres the steelers bounty scandal huh?oh wait there isnt one.they just do their job and destroy people for the pay they are given.i personally tried to hurt everyone when i played football andi didnt make a cent.i wanted to make everyone regret they decided to play football and if they couldnt take it then quit.i got pain now from it at least partially from football and i dont regret it a bit ,im 39 now and i wouldnt have to be offered a penny to nail someone on any field,cuz thats just how i am.and drop the steelers being dirty bs,its just jealous fans blabbing who never hit anyone ever.and last time i checked this wasnt about the steelers at all,woodley made a valid point that theres a bounty even without cash under the table,and i personally dont care what was offered to the saints as a bonus,i didnt see one flagarant cheap shot in any of the clips i have seen of so called dirty hits.show me the late hits and sucker punches and ankle twists and 3 or 4 extra steps to hit favre or warner where they coulda stopped and just hit em late anyway.sorry but u wont find any cuz they dont exist.i wish jack tatum could rise from the dead and hit all you whiners for free to show u that u dont need a bounty to hit someone for the hell of it.especially when its your job.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>wheres the steelers bounty scandal huh?oh wait there isnt one.they just do their job and destroy people for the pay they are given.i personally tried to hurt everyone when i played football andi didnt make a cent.i wanted to make everyone regret they decided to play football and if they couldnt take it then quit.i got pain now from it at least partially from football and i dont regret it a bit ,im 39 now and i wouldnt have to be offered a penny to nail someone on any field,cuz thats just how i am.and drop the steelers being dirty bs,its just jealous fans blabbing who never hit anyone ever.and last time i checked this wasnt about the steelers at all,woodley made a valid point that theres a bounty even without cash under the table,and i personally dont care what was offered to the saints as a bonus,i didnt see one flagarant cheap shot in any of the clips i have seen of so called dirty hits.show me the late hits and sucker punches and ankle twists and 3 or 4 extra steps to hit favre or warner where they coulda stopped and just hit em late anyway.sorry but u wont find any cuz they dont exist.i wish jack tatum could rise from the dead and hit all you whiners for free to show u that u dont need a bounty to hit someone for the hell of it.especially when its your job.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: antibenapalooza</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/03/words-of-wisdom-from-lamarr-woodley/#comment-1701582</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[antibenapalooza]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2012 23:06:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=485370#comment-1701582</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Pig Ben Rottenberger deserves to be hit hard again and again.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pig Ben Rottenberger deserves to be hit hard again and again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stevemdlthn</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/03/words-of-wisdom-from-lamarr-woodley/#comment-1701361</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[stevemdlthn]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2012 21:08:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=485370#comment-1701361</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#039;s a shame that a player has better insight on this matter than Goodell.....]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s a shame that a player has better insight on this matter than Goodell&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SaintsTownHall</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/03/words-of-wisdom-from-lamarr-woodley/#comment-1700715</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[SaintsTownHall]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2012 16:43:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=485370#comment-1700715</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Also search these headlines:
&quot;Goodell is not serious about player safety, and it&#039;s because of money&quot; 
By Chris Smith of Forbes Magazine 

&quot;Recall Saints Harsh Punishment unless/until all NFL Teams are investigated&quot; investigated]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also search these headlines:<br />
&#8220;Goodell is not serious about player safety, and it&#8217;s because of money&#8221;<br />
By Chris Smith of Forbes Magazine </p>
<p>&#8220;Recall Saints Harsh Punishment unless/until all NFL Teams are investigated&#8221; investigated</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sitbackandwatch</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/03/words-of-wisdom-from-lamarr-woodley/#comment-1700610</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[sitbackandwatch]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2012 16:00:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=485370#comment-1700610</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I love watching all of the legal hits ESPN and the NFL network run on a loop during talk of the Saints bounty program. The only questionable hit was the high/low on Favre. But the question I have, what about the tackle at the knee that tore Adrian Peterson ACL, the low ht by KC defender that Tore Tom Brady&#039;s ACL, or the constant complaints of Mike Vick being hit on every play ( in or out of bounds), Harrison&#039; mutilple fines for hard hits and finally San Fransisco defense who were praised for knocking several teams starters out in a span of several games last year. Were this hits unmentioned bounties or just chalk it up to game?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love watching all of the legal hits ESPN and the NFL network run on a loop during talk of the Saints bounty program. The only questionable hit was the high/low on Favre. But the question I have, what about the tackle at the knee that tore Adrian Peterson ACL, the low ht by KC defender that Tore Tom Brady&#8217;s ACL, or the constant complaints of Mike Vick being hit on every play ( in or out of bounds), Harrison&#8217; mutilple fines for hard hits and finally San Fransisco defense who were praised for knocking several teams starters out in a span of several games last year. Were this hits unmentioned bounties or just chalk it up to game?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jh4prez</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/03/words-of-wisdom-from-lamarr-woodley/#comment-1700498</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jh4prez]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2012 15:18:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=485370#comment-1700498</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@ all ravens fans&quot;the ravens will never win a super bowl as long as joe flacco is their quarterback.&quot;lamarr woodley=genius LOL!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ all ravens fans&#8221;the ravens will never win a super bowl as long as joe flacco is their quarterback.&#8221;lamarr woodley=genius LOL!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: emperorzero</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/03/words-of-wisdom-from-lamarr-woodley/#comment-1700441</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[emperorzero]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2012 14:50:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=485370#comment-1700441</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[History has shown the cover up is always worse than the actual crime whether it be denting dad&#039;s car, Watergate or Bountygate. The Saints are being punished for the cover up, not the actual offense.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>History has shown the cover up is always worse than the actual crime whether it be denting dad&#8217;s car, Watergate or Bountygate. The Saints are being punished for the cover up, not the actual offense.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: steelersmichele</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/03/words-of-wisdom-from-lamarr-woodley/#comment-1700346</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[steelersmichele]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2012 13:59:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=485370#comment-1700346</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think a lot of you guys are missing the point: the saints got caught. and when told to stop, they didn&#039;t and lied about it. that&#039;s the problem here. other teams probably have bounties, but they keep the price tag small and they keep it in house. the saints got too greedy. same problem with the patriots. I&#039;m sure other teams video tape, but they got caught.

the sad truth here is don&#039;t get caught, and if you do, don&#039;t lie about it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think a lot of you guys are missing the point: the saints got caught. and when told to stop, they didn&#8217;t and lied about it. that&#8217;s the problem here. other teams probably have bounties, but they keep the price tag small and they keep it in house. the saints got too greedy. same problem with the patriots. I&#8217;m sure other teams video tape, but they got caught.</p>
<p>the sad truth here is don&#8217;t get caught, and if you do, don&#8217;t lie about it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: burningbush66</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/03/words-of-wisdom-from-lamarr-woodley/#comment-1700304</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[burningbush66]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2012 13:34:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=485370#comment-1700304</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Can we please get over the so-called &quot;dirty&quot; hit on Kurt Warner? Go back and watch the film. The hit was totally CLEAN and within the rules.

Warner threw a pick and then ran toward the play. He got de-cleated and knocked out. That has been going on forever in football.

The QB who throws a pick immediately becomes a target, fair game. If you think otherwise you are dreaming. Warner himself has admitted this. Grow up people!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can we please get over the so-called &#8220;dirty&#8221; hit on Kurt Warner? Go back and watch the film. The hit was totally CLEAN and within the rules.</p>
<p>Warner threw a pick and then ran toward the play. He got de-cleated and knocked out. That has been going on forever in football.</p>
<p>The QB who throws a pick immediately becomes a target, fair game. If you think otherwise you are dreaming. Warner himself has admitted this. Grow up people!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cnmiddel</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/03/words-of-wisdom-from-lamarr-woodley/#comment-1700274</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[cnmiddel]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2012 13:16:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=485370#comment-1700274</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Man, these raven fans need to give the hate a rest give it up already flacco won&#039;t win sh-t]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Man, these raven fans need to give the hate a rest give it up already flacco won&#8217;t win sh-t</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: drunkenjunk</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/03/words-of-wisdom-from-lamarr-woodley/#comment-1700267</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[drunkenjunk]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2012 13:13:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=485370#comment-1700267</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@ fooath

Yes, Suh is a perfect example for someone that isn&#039;t trying to hurt someone. I guess stomping on people doesn&#039;t count, he&#039;s just trying hard.

@ skinsfantom

Yea, way to question my intelligence. When you use .... anytime your intelligence should be questioned. Have a nice day? How about go screw yourself because you obviously don&#039;t know anything about football players and their mentality. You&#039;re everything that is wrong with football fans. You&#039;re probably some obese, hog that has never played the game.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ fooath</p>
<p>Yes, Suh is a perfect example for someone that isn&#8217;t trying to hurt someone. I guess stomping on people doesn&#8217;t count, he&#8217;s just trying hard.</p>
<p>@ skinsfantom</p>
<p>Yea, way to question my intelligence. When you use &#8230;. anytime your intelligence should be questioned. Have a nice day? How about go screw yourself because you obviously don&#8217;t know anything about football players and their mentality. You&#8217;re everything that is wrong with football fans. You&#8217;re probably some obese, hog that has never played the game.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: drunkenjunk</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/03/words-of-wisdom-from-lamarr-woodley/#comment-1700245</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[drunkenjunk]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2012 12:59:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=485370#comment-1700245</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@ str8up12

No there isn&#039;t a difference. Trying to hurt someone and injure someone are the same thing.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ str8up12</p>
<p>No there isn&#8217;t a difference. Trying to hurt someone and injure someone are the same thing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sterilizecromartie</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/03/words-of-wisdom-from-lamarr-woodley/#comment-1700241</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[sterilizecromartie]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2012 12:54:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=485370#comment-1700241</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@mitchitized

Bingo.  This punishment is more so based on Godell being mad that his almightly self was lied to.  Also, the NFL is covering themselves for not bringing the hammer down when they first discovered this activity.  If bounties were so awful, why didn&#039;t they suspend the guilty parties immediately when they found out about it?  But, no.  They gave them a &quot;hey fellas, do us a favor and cut out this bounty stuff before the public finds out about it.  We are trying to push this &quot;safety thing&quot; and that wouldn&#039;t look good if it went public.&quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@mitchitized</p>
<p>Bingo.  This punishment is more so based on Godell being mad that his almightly self was lied to.  Also, the NFL is covering themselves for not bringing the hammer down when they first discovered this activity.  If bounties were so awful, why didn&#8217;t they suspend the guilty parties immediately when they found out about it?  But, no.  They gave them a &#8220;hey fellas, do us a favor and cut out this bounty stuff before the public finds out about it.  We are trying to push this &#8220;safety thing&#8221; and that wouldn&#8217;t look good if it went public.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: outvoted2006</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/03/words-of-wisdom-from-lamarr-woodley/#comment-1700227</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[outvoted2006]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2012 12:42:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=485370#comment-1700227</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I find it hilarious that many of you still say that the &quot;bounty payments&quot; were directed towards hurting someone. Not one single piece of evidence has been brought to light that any Saints player tried to intentionally hurt someone.
If you think that you can find one, then was the broken face that Boldin received intentional? Was Theisman&#039;s shattered leg intentional? Nope, these things just happened because football is a violent sport.
Where was all this outcry when Suh stomped Dietrich-Smith, when Suh sacks a QB by throwing him to the ground AND receiving a RTP penalty, when Steve Smith broke his teammates nose, when Roethlisberger gets sacked viciously 6 times a game???
Picking and choosing your arguments because they make you feel better is very close-minded and ignorant.
Mike, I am not buying your flippity flop write up!! It seems as though your initial stance on assumptions is finally starting to erode and this is your first attempt at grasping for a lifeline. NOT HAPPENING!!!

Your statements of 
&quot;But then I considered what he was saying.  And it started to make some sense.&quot;
AND 
&quot;But there’s a certain amount of appeal to the notion that a disconnect exists between the unsavory methods of getting players to play with reckless abandon and the reality that, in the end, guys were simply playing football, often with reckless abandon.&quot;,
are both proof that you have been following the crowd during this situation, which is irresponsible &quot;journalism&quot;. Also, the disconnect you talk about, you and your fellow sports writers are the ones that invented that and have been exploiting it since day one!!!

AGAIN, you should be ashamed of yourself!!

Try writing something without having to use someone&#039;s quote, or having to piggyback off of someone else&#039;s story!!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I find it hilarious that many of you still say that the &#8220;bounty payments&#8221; were directed towards hurting someone. Not one single piece of evidence has been brought to light that any Saints player tried to intentionally hurt someone.<br />
If you think that you can find one, then was the broken face that Boldin received intentional? Was Theisman&#8217;s shattered leg intentional? Nope, these things just happened because football is a violent sport.<br />
Where was all this outcry when Suh stomped Dietrich-Smith, when Suh sacks a QB by throwing him to the ground AND receiving a RTP penalty, when Steve Smith broke his teammates nose, when Roethlisberger gets sacked viciously 6 times a game???<br />
Picking and choosing your arguments because they make you feel better is very close-minded and ignorant.<br />
Mike, I am not buying your flippity flop write up!! It seems as though your initial stance on assumptions is finally starting to erode and this is your first attempt at grasping for a lifeline. NOT HAPPENING!!!</p>
<p>Your statements of<br />
&#8220;But then I considered what he was saying.  And it started to make some sense.&#8221;<br />
AND<br />
&#8220;But there’s a certain amount of appeal to the notion that a disconnect exists between the unsavory methods of getting players to play with reckless abandon and the reality that, in the end, guys were simply playing football, often with reckless abandon.&#8221;,<br />
are both proof that you have been following the crowd during this situation, which is irresponsible &#8220;journalism&#8221;. Also, the disconnect you talk about, you and your fellow sports writers are the ones that invented that and have been exploiting it since day one!!!</p>
<p>AGAIN, you should be ashamed of yourself!!</p>
<p>Try writing something without having to use someone&#8217;s quote, or having to piggyback off of someone else&#8217;s story!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sterilizecromartie</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/03/words-of-wisdom-from-lamarr-woodley/#comment-1700220</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[sterilizecromartie]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2012 12:38:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=485370#comment-1700220</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It is quite aggrevating that it took an NFL player to speak out such common sense before Florio listened.  Hey Mike, you have some pretty intelligent and loyal readers on this site who have been preaching this SAME EXACT CONCEPT.  If you took a few minutes to actually read through your reader comments you would have seen people making the same point Woodley just made.  Don&#039;t act like Woodley is this great prophet finally shedding light on the situation.  Lots of people have had that same mindset since this whole thing started a month ago.  Now go back to eating your crow.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is quite aggrevating that it took an NFL player to speak out such common sense before Florio listened.  Hey Mike, you have some pretty intelligent and loyal readers on this site who have been preaching this SAME EXACT CONCEPT.  If you took a few minutes to actually read through your reader comments you would have seen people making the same point Woodley just made.  Don&#8217;t act like Woodley is this great prophet finally shedding light on the situation.  Lots of people have had that same mindset since this whole thing started a month ago.  Now go back to eating your crow.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: timtheenchanter1</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/03/words-of-wisdom-from-lamarr-woodley/#comment-1700214</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[timtheenchanter1]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2012 12:34:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=485370#comment-1700214</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[2 major issues with professor woodley&#039;s strawman arguments.

1)  These bounties in the saints case specifically incentivized injuries, not just good plays that may happen to cause injuries.  There are things a player can do that are illegal or poor sportsmanship that go beyond just getting a sack or &quot;laying a hit&quot; on someone. therefore the comparison to legal contract incentives is not valid.

2) The NFL&#039;s rules strictly prohibit *ANY* non-contract rewards or incentive, whether they are incentivizing legal or illegal plays.   The reward system they had in place was already against the rules.  The fact that it included specific injury to players when the league is &lt;b&gt;facing lawsuits out the wazoo from injured players&lt;/b&gt; just made the situation one where the league had no choice but to bring the hammer hard.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>2 major issues with professor woodley&#8217;s strawman arguments.</p>
<p>1)  These bounties in the saints case specifically incentivized injuries, not just good plays that may happen to cause injuries.  There are things a player can do that are illegal or poor sportsmanship that go beyond just getting a sack or &#8220;laying a hit&#8221; on someone. therefore the comparison to legal contract incentives is not valid.</p>
<p>2) The NFL&#8217;s rules strictly prohibit *ANY* non-contract rewards or incentive, whether they are incentivizing legal or illegal plays.   The reward system they had in place was already against the rules.  The fact that it included specific injury to players when the league is <b>facing lawsuits out the wazoo from injured players</b> just made the situation one where the league had no choice but to bring the hammer hard.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: newguy925</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/03/words-of-wisdom-from-lamarr-woodley/#comment-1700211</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[newguy925]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2012 12:31:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=485370#comment-1700211</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Trying to hurt someone on the field is different than trying to injure someone.  Yes, you want to hit them as hard as you can when you make a tackle. No, you do not hit a qb low after he threw the ball.

James Harrison = trying to hurt (god I love watching him hit people)

Saints = trying to injure

There is a difference, and the Saints wrote it down, and took a picture, and now the league has it.  They threatened the livelihood of their coworkers and were stupid about it. Pay the piper.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Trying to hurt someone on the field is different than trying to injure someone.  Yes, you want to hit them as hard as you can when you make a tackle. No, you do not hit a qb low after he threw the ball.</p>
<p>James Harrison = trying to hurt (god I love watching him hit people)</p>
<p>Saints = trying to injure</p>
<p>There is a difference, and the Saints wrote it down, and took a picture, and now the league has it.  They threatened the livelihood of their coworkers and were stupid about it. Pay the piper.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 49erstim</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/03/words-of-wisdom-from-lamarr-woodley/#comment-1700195</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[49erstim]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2012 12:21:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=485370#comment-1700195</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I don&#039;t have any problem with &quot;incentive-laden&quot; contracts. $1500 per sack? Awesome! I hope ya break the record! I don&#039;t even have a problem with under the table payouts for sacks, ints, TDs, etc. I&#039;m not the IRS nor am I a salary cap lawyer..... But if you tried to hand out money to intentionally injure another human being then you&#039;re a dirtbag. Plain and simple. Also if you advocate the practice of intentionally injuring a person to win a GAME then you are also a dirtbag. I can&#039;t believe there is even an argument here. I&#039;ve lost a lot of faith in humanity reading some of these comments.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t have any problem with &#8220;incentive-laden&#8221; contracts. $1500 per sack? Awesome! I hope ya break the record! I don&#8217;t even have a problem with under the table payouts for sacks, ints, TDs, etc. I&#8217;m not the IRS nor am I a salary cap lawyer&#8230;.. But if you tried to hand out money to intentionally injure another human being then you&#8217;re a dirtbag. Plain and simple. Also if you advocate the practice of intentionally injuring a person to win a GAME then you are also a dirtbag. I can&#8217;t believe there is even an argument here. I&#8217;ve lost a lot of faith in humanity reading some of these comments.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rpiotr01</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/03/words-of-wisdom-from-lamarr-woodley/#comment-1700176</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[rpiotr01]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2012 12:02:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=485370#comment-1700176</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A legal line is crossed when it comes to intent to injure. This isn&#039;t about &quot;just playing football,&quot; it&#039;s about liability. A professional sports league cannot tolerate a situation where coaches are telling players specifically to injure other players, and giving them cash payments for such injuries. 

Contract incentives are completely different. Player, agent, team and league agree upfront to extra payment - through open and transparent payment methods - for hitting certain statistics recognized as valid by all four parties. That last part is particularly valid - it&#039;s not just about agreement, it&#039;s about game integrity. Do you really think this would all be OK if Hargrove had in his contract &quot;$10K for injuring Brett Favre&quot;? Of course not. No judge or jury in the country would buy that if Favre decided to sue. That&#039;d be a formal contract to ruin another person&#039;s health. It&#039;s illegal and its shady, so the Saints did what most folks do when it comes to shady and illegal things - they did it under the table in a way that would be very hard to trace (cash only). Doing this as a formal system would put the league and everyone else in a TON of trouble. But it&#039;s OK because it wasn&#039;t done formally?

Please. Injury is incidental in professional sports. Assault is not. That&#039;s the difference. It&#039;s not just about the game.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A legal line is crossed when it comes to intent to injure. This isn&#8217;t about &#8220;just playing football,&#8221; it&#8217;s about liability. A professional sports league cannot tolerate a situation where coaches are telling players specifically to injure other players, and giving them cash payments for such injuries. </p>
<p>Contract incentives are completely different. Player, agent, team and league agree upfront to extra payment &#8211; through open and transparent payment methods &#8211; for hitting certain statistics recognized as valid by all four parties. That last part is particularly valid &#8211; it&#8217;s not just about agreement, it&#8217;s about game integrity. Do you really think this would all be OK if Hargrove had in his contract &#8220;$10K for injuring Brett Favre&#8221;? Of course not. No judge or jury in the country would buy that if Favre decided to sue. That&#8217;d be a formal contract to ruin another person&#8217;s health. It&#8217;s illegal and its shady, so the Saints did what most folks do when it comes to shady and illegal things &#8211; they did it under the table in a way that would be very hard to trace (cash only). Doing this as a formal system would put the league and everyone else in a TON of trouble. But it&#8217;s OK because it wasn&#8217;t done formally?</p>
<p>Please. Injury is incidental in professional sports. Assault is not. That&#8217;s the difference. It&#8217;s not just about the game.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ravenator</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/03/words-of-wisdom-from-lamarr-woodley/#comment-1700169</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ravenator]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2012 11:46:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=485370#comment-1700169</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Woodley is a moron, does he ever shut up?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Woodley is a moron, does he ever shut up?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: daddyb1gdrawz</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/03/words-of-wisdom-from-lamarr-woodley/#comment-1700166</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[daddyb1gdrawz]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2012 11:43:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=485370#comment-1700166</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I 100% agree with Woodley. I think the word &quot;bounty&quot; is influencing many opinions. Lets take the word &quot;bounty&quot; out of it and call it a cash payment. It really is no different than what is written in contracts (incentives). However no incentive is worded to knock a player out of the game. If that is what the Saints condoned, then it is wrong.  But if it is as Woodley claims, then there is no problem with it in my book.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I 100% agree with Woodley. I think the word &#8220;bounty&#8221; is influencing many opinions. Lets take the word &#8220;bounty&#8221; out of it and call it a cash payment. It really is no different than what is written in contracts (incentives). However no incentive is worded to knock a player out of the game. If that is what the Saints condoned, then it is wrong.  But if it is as Woodley claims, then there is no problem with it in my book.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SaintsTownHall</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/03/words-of-wisdom-from-lamarr-woodley/#comment-1700163</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[SaintsTownHall]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2012 11:41:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=485370#comment-1700163</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[IF indeed the Saints actually tried to hurt players in games, then how come they were not penalized and fined in games? From the time I played pee wee football, we had a similar system (however no cash) but if we ever actually took a cheap shot, there was hell to pay to the same coach that gave the &quot;bounty&quot;. The play on words is not literally meaning go &quot;kill the QB&quot; 

Search in google, &quot;No Bounty Necessary, Saints Fans Are After Goodell&quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>IF indeed the Saints actually tried to hurt players in games, then how come they were not penalized and fined in games? From the time I played pee wee football, we had a similar system (however no cash) but if we ever actually took a cheap shot, there was hell to pay to the same coach that gave the &#8220;bounty&#8221;. The play on words is not literally meaning go &#8220;kill the QB&#8221; </p>
<p>Search in google, &#8220;No Bounty Necessary, Saints Fans Are After Goodell&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 7to10for6allday</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/03/words-of-wisdom-from-lamarr-woodley/#comment-1700150</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[7to10for6allday]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2012 11:22:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=485370#comment-1700150</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Every team does it....it&#039;s a matter of language, if the coaches told the players you get money for Sacks, tackles, INTs etc, everything would be ok.  But the minute they used words like injure, cart off that&#039;s where they went wrong.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Every team does it&#8230;.it&#8217;s a matter of language, if the coaches told the players you get money for Sacks, tackles, INTs etc, everything would be ok.  But the minute they used words like injure, cart off that&#8217;s where they went wrong.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jerlee7</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/03/words-of-wisdom-from-lamarr-woodley/#comment-1700145</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jerlee7]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2012 11:10:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=485370#comment-1700145</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I admit to never reading a single NFL player&#039;s contract, but I would guess that not one offers a $10,000 incentive to injure a starting quarterback.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I admit to never reading a single NFL player&#8217;s contract, but I would guess that not one offers a $10,000 incentive to injure a starting quarterback.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: isphet71</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/03/words-of-wisdom-from-lamarr-woodley/#comment-1700144</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[isphet71]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2012 11:10:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=485370#comment-1700144</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Woodley is right to an extent. Bounties are similar to contract incentives. There are three main reasons why bounties are illegal, however:

1. Bounties are NOT reported against salary cap, as are contract bonuses. The IRS would put you in jail for doing something similar with your taxes.

2. Bounty rewards can also include (but are not limited to) rewarding &quot;non-football&quot; plays on the NFL field. Hurting a QB 2 seconds after he hands off would and could in no way be a rewardable contract bonus.

3. In the Saint&#039;s specific case, they continually lied about the usage of bounties. Specifically with behavior constituting the worst elements of points 1 and 2.

It&#039;s no wonder the Saints got the hammer.

Honestly.. I have no problem with bounties, and neither does the NFL if:

1. They reward &quot;good football&quot; plays
2. They are reported against the salary cap
3. You are up-front about them throughout the process.

THESE are called contract incentives.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Woodley is right to an extent. Bounties are similar to contract incentives. There are three main reasons why bounties are illegal, however:</p>
<p>1. Bounties are NOT reported against salary cap, as are contract bonuses. The IRS would put you in jail for doing something similar with your taxes.</p>
<p>2. Bounty rewards can also include (but are not limited to) rewarding &#8220;non-football&#8221; plays on the NFL field. Hurting a QB 2 seconds after he hands off would and could in no way be a rewardable contract bonus.</p>
<p>3. In the Saint&#8217;s specific case, they continually lied about the usage of bounties. Specifically with behavior constituting the worst elements of points 1 and 2.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s no wonder the Saints got the hammer.</p>
<p>Honestly.. I have no problem with bounties, and neither does the NFL if:</p>
<p>1. They reward &#8220;good football&#8221; plays<br />
2. They are reported against the salary cap<br />
3. You are up-front about them throughout the process.</p>
<p>THESE are called contract incentives.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: quittsburghstoolers</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/03/words-of-wisdom-from-lamarr-woodley/#comment-1700135</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[quittsburghstoolers]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2012 10:53:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=485370#comment-1700135</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#039;s not hard to understand why Woodley could get confused 
about what is considered a bounty &amp; what&#039;s not &amp; what&#039;s 
considered a good clean hit &amp; what&#039;s a dirty play 
that&#039;s main purpose is to injure someone.

After all, he plays for one of the dirtiest teams in the 
league so the line (for all of them) is naturally blurred...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s not hard to understand why Woodley could get confused<br />
about what is considered a bounty &amp; what&#8217;s not &amp; what&#8217;s<br />
considered a good clean hit &amp; what&#8217;s a dirty play<br />
that&#8217;s main purpose is to injure someone.</p>
<p>After all, he plays for one of the dirtiest teams in the<br />
league so the line (for all of them) is naturally blurred&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mitchitized</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/03/words-of-wisdom-from-lamarr-woodley/#comment-1700119</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[mitchitized]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2012 08:36:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=485370#comment-1700119</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just a few years ago football players openly and publicly admitted that if they saw a QB/RB on the injury report, they would target the wounded area just to get said QB/RB out of the game.

Why was there no outrage then?

This hypocrisy and deluded self-righteousness is getting out of hand.

The Saints are not being punished because they tried to hurt players for money, they are getting punished because they got caught, lied, got caught again, lied again...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just a few years ago football players openly and publicly admitted that if they saw a QB/RB on the injury report, they would target the wounded area just to get said QB/RB out of the game.</p>
<p>Why was there no outrage then?</p>
<p>This hypocrisy and deluded self-righteousness is getting out of hand.</p>
<p>The Saints are not being punished because they tried to hurt players for money, they are getting punished because they got caught, lied, got caught again, lied again&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thephantomcoder</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/03/words-of-wisdom-from-lamarr-woodley/#comment-1700118</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[thephantomcoder]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2012 08:35:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=485370#comment-1700118</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Looks like they missed part of the reason for the punishment. Yes some of it was about player saftey but as woodley says, these payments are just like incentives that are written into the contract, except they are not written into the contracts, and constitute violations of the rules. You cant have teams paying players outside of their contracts, and salary cap structures. Thats called cheating.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks like they missed part of the reason for the punishment. Yes some of it was about player saftey but as woodley says, these payments are just like incentives that are written into the contract, except they are not written into the contracts, and constitute violations of the rules. You cant have teams paying players outside of their contracts, and salary cap structures. Thats called cheating.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: randygnyc</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/03/words-of-wisdom-from-lamarr-woodley/#comment-1700116</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[randygnyc]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2012 08:20:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=485370#comment-1700116</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There&#039;s a difference between playing football within the rules or subverting the rule of law by premeditating injury for monetary gain. additionally, there is a purposeful intention to circumvent the salary cap and the federal crime of tax evasion.   Finally, IMO,a  criminal enterprise is the result, and could easily be prosecuted under federal RICO statutes.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s a difference between playing football within the rules or subverting the rule of law by premeditating injury for monetary gain. additionally, there is a purposeful intention to circumvent the salary cap and the federal crime of tax evasion.   Finally, IMO,a  criminal enterprise is the result, and could easily be prosecuted under federal RICO statutes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thehatefulnerd</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/03/words-of-wisdom-from-lamarr-woodley/#comment-1700114</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[thehatefulnerd]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2012 07:53:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=485370#comment-1700114</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Incentives are at least theoretically not paid by members of organized crime.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Incentives are at least theoretically not paid by members of organized crime.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
