I understand that Gleason was against the release, just not sure why based on what they show and the brotherhood of players. Anyway, we now know that Pamphilon discussed it with him and when they couldn’t agree, they got a 3rd party to decide on its’ release. The unbiased, mutually agreed upon 3rd party said, “do it”. That seems to be the end of any suit against Pamphilon by Gleason or the Saints.

Lets move onto the real issues and leave this episode as an * to the bounty-gate story.

Pamphilon betrayed a dying man…it does not get any lower than that.
—-

Cry me a river. There was no betrayal there at all. First, Gleason only had the rights to the finished product.

Second, both Gleason & Williams are celebrities…which means, by law, they are fair game to any form of reporting…and that they sacrificed privacy when they chose to follow the career they chose.

“Dying man” is a stretch. We’re all dying in some way.

Steve can leave behind a tape of the inner workings of a team for his kids or he can leave a legacy of change that his kids can be proud of and possibly benefit from if they play football – time to speak out Steve – your silence speaks volumes and at the same time deafens your crusade

Pamphilon would not have had access to the Saints meetings had it not been for Gleason and even when Gleason told Pamphilon, he did not want the tapes released, Pamphilon released them.

It is obvious the tapes were being made for the Gleason family trust and Pamphilon not only betrayed a dying man, Steve Gleason, but Steve’s wife and young son.

Pamphilon is the lowest form of life on earth…media scum.

He doesn’t have to show us a damn thing to amuse our rabid curiousity.

If Gleason feels wronged but on the right side of this and damaged from it, it’s his choice to sue.

I would also suggest that Pamphilon could have divulged the speech without providing the recording of it.

Perhaps Pamphilon did just that and went to the NFL to share his concerns? Maybe Pamphilon is the whistle blower?

And maybe he couldn’t help himself but release it at the thought of Payton, Williams and co. winning their appeals.

The only thing different he could have done is to report it to nfl rather than public. But then nfl could have swept it under the rug.

Absolutely correct. Give the tapes to Goodell, and then he buries them in a quid pro quo move to get Gleason’s cooperation to not sue the NFL for his injuries. The last thing the NFL needs is Gleason saying he never authorized the NFL to release the tapes publicly. The public would have never heard them. For all we know, Goodell discovered the existence of this audio during his Saints investigation, and privately encouraged Pamphilon to release this info that he would not have been able to do so easily.

Biased much?

This indignation is rich coming from a parasite whose living is made on trafficking rumor and innuendo. Let’s see YOU be transparent.

It would be entirely foolish to release the contract….especially if there is no explicit provision to release material. It only adds more eyes and more opinions to the issue that can conjure up reasons for the 2 parties to fight.

If I released the audio….I’d tuck away the contract for the court of law instead of releasing to the court of public opinion.

BTW- I like the previous poster question: why not have the other party release the contract?

Pamphilon didn’t do anything wrong here …. the New Orleans Saints did.

A man is somewhere he shouldn’t be, and witnesses a murder. The accused man’s lawyer doesn’t prove his client’s innocence, instead he puts the witness on the defensive for having seen what he saw.

Love it.

There was a clear moral obligation to act here, so the contract can suck it.

Pamphilon did the right thing by going public. Give it to Goodell and it’s an ashpile on top of the Spygate video ashes.

Given the gravity of the audio versus Steve’s crusade, what are Steve’s thoughts on Greg Williams’ words. I think Steve should’ve been repulsed while hearing it live in the locker room let alone later on with time to reflect on it.

This is Steve’s business, but his his silence deafens his crusade. Steve needs to speak out on the content of the audio more than the legalise of the release of the audio.

If this guy gives the tape to Goodell… and it disappears… then what?