<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 2012 mock draft, take two</title>
	<atom:link href="http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/09/2012-mock-draft-take-two/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/09/2012-mock-draft-take-two/</link>
	<description>ProFootballTalk on NBCSports.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 19:00:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: chiefsfaninpa</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/09/2012-mock-draft-take-two/#comment-1735477</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[chiefsfaninpa]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Apr 2012 17:00:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=511451#comment-1735477</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I hope that KC DOESNT pick Ryan Tannehill if he is still available at 11. I have read some reports ( i think that they are mostly smoke screens that Matt Kalil might fall to KC at 11 or KC may trade up for him if the Vikings don&#039;t pick him). I think KC may pick Michael Brockers at 11 or they will try to trade back in the first round. 

I don&#039;t see Brandon Weeden going in the first round..2nd round yes but definitely not a first round choice even if it is Cleveland.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hope that KC DOESNT pick Ryan Tannehill if he is still available at 11. I have read some reports ( i think that they are mostly smoke screens that Matt Kalil might fall to KC at 11 or KC may trade up for him if the Vikings don&#8217;t pick him). I think KC may pick Michael Brockers at 11 or they will try to trade back in the first round. </p>
<p>I don&#8217;t see Brandon Weeden going in the first round..2nd round yes but definitely not a first round choice even if it is Cleveland.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fiyacheef</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/09/2012-mock-draft-take-two/#comment-1726005</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[fiyacheef]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2012 22:00:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=511451#comment-1726005</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I know I didnt see this right... did I see Michael Brockers as the 5th pick....ARE U NUTTZZ!!!! first off that wouldnt be a financially smart taking him so high up. Second of all they have just signed Akoye from the Bears and formerly of the Texans...and 3rdly, there&#039;s no defensive tackle rated that high anyway...so why in the &quot;H&quot; would you do that...dude....Really!!?? LOL]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know I didnt see this right&#8230; did I see Michael Brockers as the 5th pick&#8230;.ARE U NUTTZZ!!!! first off that wouldnt be a financially smart taking him so high up. Second of all they have just signed Akoye from the Bears and formerly of the Texans&#8230;and 3rdly, there&#8217;s no defensive tackle rated that high anyway&#8230;so why in the &#8220;H&#8221; would you do that&#8230;dude&#8230;.Really!!?? LOL</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bigben88</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/09/2012-mock-draft-take-two/#comment-1722707</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[bigben88]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2012 16:43:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=511451#comment-1722707</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In response to comments about Kuechly.

1)  True.  He will not fall to 32.
2)  Sad to say, if for some miracle he really did fall to 32, everyone knows Jerry Reese WILL NOT DRAFT A LB in the first two (probably 3) rounds.
3) In other words, The Giants would pass.
4) The Giants purely draft on height weight speed in the early rounds.  As much as I hate that, its hard to argue with the Giants success.
5) Although as a long time Giant Fan, it still is hard to watch our LB&#039;s get run over or around every game.  The G men are all about DE&#039;s and Secondary.  
6) Based on #5, if you watch most of the schemes.  The Giants do not run a 4-3 (with 4 secondary players).. The Giants run a 5-1-5, sometimes a 4-1-6, or even a 5-0-6.
7)  With all this said, I would be happy with Any OL, or LB in the first  two rounds...  But we all know Jerry Reese and it will most likely be a DT,DE or CB/Safety..]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In response to comments about Kuechly.</p>
<p>1)  True.  He will not fall to 32.<br />
2)  Sad to say, if for some miracle he really did fall to 32, everyone knows Jerry Reese WILL NOT DRAFT A LB in the first two (probably 3) rounds.<br />
3) In other words, The Giants would pass.<br />
4) The Giants purely draft on height weight speed in the early rounds.  As much as I hate that, its hard to argue with the Giants success.<br />
5) Although as a long time Giant Fan, it still is hard to watch our LB&#8217;s get run over or around every game.  The G men are all about DE&#8217;s and Secondary.<br />
6) Based on #5, if you watch most of the schemes.  The Giants do not run a 4-3 (with 4 secondary players).. The Giants run a 5-1-5, sometimes a 4-1-6, or even a 5-0-6.<br />
7)  With all this said, I would be happy with Any OL, or LB in the first  two rounds&#8230;  But we all know Jerry Reese and it will most likely be a DT,DE or CB/Safety..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pizzon</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/09/2012-mock-draft-take-two/#comment-1719725</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[pizzon]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Apr 2012 12:30:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=511451#comment-1719725</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Im sure whomever wrote this really beleives the Steelers are going to draft a tight end. wow gave this clown a job!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Im sure whomever wrote this really beleives the Steelers are going to draft a tight end. wow gave this clown a job!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 1historian</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/09/2012-mock-draft-take-two/#comment-1717646</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[1historian]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2012 11:17:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=511451#comment-1717646</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My Pats have only 6 picks this year, but we all know that (as we speak) the evil genius known as Belichik is mixing his magic voodoo juice in his cauldron and preparing to surprise every one and to do what he do do do

In Bill we trust

11 straight winning seasons - in the playoffs 9 of them

5 Super Bowls, won 3

blah

blah

blah


anyone else match that?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My Pats have only 6 picks this year, but we all know that (as we speak) the evil genius known as Belichik is mixing his magic voodoo juice in his cauldron and preparing to surprise every one and to do what he do do do</p>
<p>In Bill we trust</p>
<p>11 straight winning seasons &#8211; in the playoffs 9 of them</p>
<p>5 Super Bowls, won 3</p>
<p>blah</p>
<p>blah</p>
<p>blah</p>
<p>anyone else match that?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 1historian</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/09/2012-mock-draft-take-two/#comment-1717636</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[1historian]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2012 11:11:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=511451#comment-1717636</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[mocks are great

and they all have one thing in common: the day the draft ends they&#039;re forgotten

but they&#039;re fun while they last, which is all they&#039;re supposed to be.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>mocks are great</p>
<p>and they all have one thing in common: the day the draft ends they&#8217;re forgotten</p>
<p>but they&#8217;re fun while they last, which is all they&#8217;re supposed to be.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: butkismyditka</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/09/2012-mock-draft-take-two/#comment-1717334</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[butkismyditka]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2012 01:59:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=511451#comment-1717334</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;ve never been one to bash this mock, or bash that prediction, because lesbihonest, nobody knows whats really gonna happen on draft day. everybody was saying that Aldon was a big reach last year....but Luke dropping nearly out of the first round? are you serious? I just can&#039;t see that happening. not even the slightest chance.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve never been one to bash this mock, or bash that prediction, because lesbihonest, nobody knows whats really gonna happen on draft day. everybody was saying that Aldon was a big reach last year&#8230;.but Luke dropping nearly out of the first round? are you serious? I just can&#8217;t see that happening. not even the slightest chance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: drexelvol</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/09/2012-mock-draft-take-two/#comment-1716682</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[drexelvol]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2012 20:53:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=511451#comment-1716682</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Outside of the top 5, every one of these will be wrong.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Outside of the top 5, every one of these will be wrong.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas Pash</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/09/2012-mock-draft-take-two/#comment-1716117</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Thomas Pash]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2012 17:16:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=511451#comment-1716117</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hey Silva, Check out this mock.  Let me know what you think. 

http://thesportsdump.com/2012/04/11/the-sports-dump-first-annual-nfl-mock-draft-2012/]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Silva, Check out this mock.  Let me know what you think. </p>
<p><a href="http://thesportsdump.com/2012/04/11/the-sports-dump-first-annual-nfl-mock-draft-2012/" rel="nofollow">http://thesportsdump.com/2012/04/11/the-sports-dump-first-annual-nfl-mock-draft-2012/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jclii</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/09/2012-mock-draft-take-two/#comment-1714742</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jclii]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2012 21:01:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=511451#comment-1714742</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is god awful. A TE to the Steelers? Really? I laugh in this mock drafts general direction. I really should have gone to school to be a sports writer. Apparently you don&#039;t have to have any clue about sports. Amazing.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is god awful. A TE to the Steelers? Really? I laugh in this mock drafts general direction. I really should have gone to school to be a sports writer. Apparently you don&#8217;t have to have any clue about sports. Amazing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mrgdawg</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/09/2012-mock-draft-take-two/#comment-1713884</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[mrgdawg]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2012 14:07:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=511451#comment-1713884</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Terrible mock draft.  No way the Bucc&#039;s go with a DT and the Chiefs are not getting Tannehill.  Weeden isn&#039;t going to be drafted in the first round either.
Epic Fail!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Terrible mock draft.  No way the Bucc&#8217;s go with a DT and the Chiefs are not getting Tannehill.  Weeden isn&#8217;t going to be drafted in the first round either.<br />
Epic Fail!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: igotadigbick</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/09/2012-mock-draft-take-two/#comment-1713765</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[igotadigbick]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2012 12:56:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=511451#comment-1713765</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[#23 Lions-Janoris Jenkins. There I fixed it for you]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#23 Lions-Janoris Jenkins. There I fixed it for you</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lilbitofsoul</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/09/2012-mock-draft-take-two/#comment-1711709</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[lilbitofsoul]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2012 10:17:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=511451#comment-1711709</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This just in: Matt Millen was spotted hacking into PFT system and leaving his thoughts on the draft.

This is just trrrrble, and as a Lions fan I can spot trrrble from a mile away...just trrrble]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This just in: Matt Millen was spotted hacking into PFT system and leaving his thoughts on the draft.</p>
<p>This is just trrrrble, and as a Lions fan I can spot trrrble from a mile away&#8230;just trrrble</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bassrecord</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/09/2012-mock-draft-take-two/#comment-1711681</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[bassrecord]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2012 07:17:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=511451#comment-1711681</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[All you that signed up just to post about this World&#039;s Lousiest Mock draft just got pranked. All of PFT&#039;s stuff is in free fall. IT IS GETTING WORSE.

Don&#039;t believe me? Go back and reread this junk tripe.
See it&#039;s worse than the last read.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All you that signed up just to post about this World&#8217;s Lousiest Mock draft just got pranked. All of PFT&#8217;s stuff is in free fall. IT IS GETTING WORSE.</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t believe me? Go back and reread this junk tripe.<br />
See it&#8217;s worse than the last read.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: randallflagg52</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/09/2012-mock-draft-take-two/#comment-1711657</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[randallflagg52]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2012 05:22:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=511451#comment-1711657</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Gotta take up for PFT a bit here, even if I disagree with a lot of their picks in this mock.

Most teams doesn&#039;t draft for need. They go for Best Player Available (B.P.A.) even if they have a glaring hole at another posistion, especially in the early rounds. Sometimes the need and B.P.A. match up (Baltimore and Jimmy Smith and Torrey Smith last year for a perfect example. Jimmy was rated top 10 and Torrey was rated 1st round by Baltimore) but most of the time teams stick to their board regardless of the current roster (Suh over Russel Okung for example). This is how teams are built for the most part. Talent always trumps need.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gotta take up for PFT a bit here, even if I disagree with a lot of their picks in this mock.</p>
<p>Most teams doesn&#8217;t draft for need. They go for Best Player Available (B.P.A.) even if they have a glaring hole at another posistion, especially in the early rounds. Sometimes the need and B.P.A. match up (Baltimore and Jimmy Smith and Torrey Smith last year for a perfect example. Jimmy was rated top 10 and Torrey was rated 1st round by Baltimore) but most of the time teams stick to their board regardless of the current roster (Suh over Russel Okung for example). This is how teams are built for the most part. Talent always trumps need.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: foul83</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/09/2012-mock-draft-take-two/#comment-1711608</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[foul83]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2012 03:56:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=511451#comment-1711608</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Eagles explanation sounds dirty. Just me?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Eagles explanation sounds dirty. Just me?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nobby821</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/09/2012-mock-draft-take-two/#comment-1711605</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[nobby821]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2012 03:53:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=511451#comment-1711605</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What a profoundly terrible mock draft. The bucs will not draft another DT when the rest of the defense sucks so much more.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What a profoundly terrible mock draft. The bucs will not draft another DT when the rest of the defense sucks so much more.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TheJStyles</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/09/2012-mock-draft-take-two/#comment-1711593</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[TheJStyles]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2012 03:40:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=511451#comment-1711593</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#039;s almost as if you purposely made this mock suck so that people would comment on it...

..hmmmm...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s almost as if you purposely made this mock suck so that people would comment on it&#8230;</p>
<p>..hmmmm&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: blacknyellablacknyella</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/09/2012-mock-draft-take-two/#comment-1711588</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[blacknyellablacknyella]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2012 03:35:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=511451#comment-1711588</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[HORRIBLE! You have absolutely NO feel for the needs of the Steelers. Tight end?! Ha!! We&#039;ve got Heath Miller, Weslye Saunders, David Johnson . . . We&#039;ve got needs on O-line, corner, Nose tackle, ILB . . . with so many vets riding off into the twilight, Steelers have real needs. Not in position to go BPA. Do some research.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>HORRIBLE! You have absolutely NO feel for the needs of the Steelers. Tight end?! Ha!! We&#8217;ve got Heath Miller, Weslye Saunders, David Johnson . . . We&#8217;ve got needs on O-line, corner, Nose tackle, ILB . . . with so many vets riding off into the twilight, Steelers have real needs. Not in position to go BPA. Do some research.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cluelessdufus</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/09/2012-mock-draft-take-two/#comment-1711581</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[cluelessdufus]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2012 03:26:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=511451#comment-1711581</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My draft

1# Andrew Luck
2#RG3
3#Matt Kalil [my favorite team]
4#Trent Richardson
5#Morris Claiborne
6# Justin Blackmon
7#Melvin Ingram 
8#Micheal Floyd 
9#Dontari Poe
10#Riley Reiff
11#Ryan Tannehill
12#Quinton Coples
13#David Decrasto
14#Fletcher Cox
15#Luke Kuechly
16#Kendall Wright
17#Mark Barron
18#Courtney Upshaw 
19#Whitney Celicus 
20#Cordy Glenn
21#Dre Kirkpatrick
22#Stephen Gilmore
23#Johnthan Martin
24#Dont&#039;e Hightower
25#Micheal Brockers
26#Rueben Randle
27#Shea McClellin
28#Peter Konz 
29#Devon Still
30#Coby Flenner
31#Donald Butler
32#Harrison Smith

Now I know this is a little shaky but if I explained a few I think it would even out]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My draft</p>
<p>1# Andrew Luck<br />
2#RG3<br />
3#Matt Kalil [my favorite team]<br />
4#Trent Richardson<br />
5#Morris Claiborne<br />
6# Justin Blackmon<br />
7#Melvin Ingram<br />
8#Micheal Floyd<br />
9#Dontari Poe<br />
10#Riley Reiff<br />
11#Ryan Tannehill<br />
12#Quinton Coples<br />
13#David Decrasto<br />
14#Fletcher Cox<br />
15#Luke Kuechly<br />
16#Kendall Wright<br />
17#Mark Barron<br />
18#Courtney Upshaw<br />
19#Whitney Celicus<br />
20#Cordy Glenn<br />
21#Dre Kirkpatrick<br />
22#Stephen Gilmore<br />
23#Johnthan Martin<br />
24#Dont&#8217;e Hightower<br />
25#Micheal Brockers<br />
26#Rueben Randle<br />
27#Shea McClellin<br />
28#Peter Konz<br />
29#Devon Still<br />
30#Coby Flenner<br />
31#Donald Butler<br />
32#Harrison Smith</p>
<p>Now I know this is a little shaky but if I explained a few I think it would even out</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: seattlenative12</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/09/2012-mock-draft-take-two/#comment-1711565</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[seattlenative12]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2012 03:02:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=511451#comment-1711565</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yeah I&#039;m pretty sure the Seahawks secondary is what they need to improve on in the draft, LOL.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah I&#8217;m pretty sure the Seahawks secondary is what they need to improve on in the draft, LOL.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sixburghsteelers</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/09/2012-mock-draft-take-two/#comment-1711564</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[sixburghsteelers]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2012 03:00:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=511451#comment-1711564</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;24. Steelers: Coby Fleener, tight end, Stanford.

Pittsburgh passes on line help to draft the best player left&quot;

Really Evan...really???


C&#039;mon Man]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;24. Steelers: Coby Fleener, tight end, Stanford.</p>
<p>Pittsburgh passes on line help to draft the best player left&#8221;</p>
<p>Really Evan&#8230;really???</p>
<p>C&#8217;mon Man</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: klownboy</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/09/2012-mock-draft-take-two/#comment-1711541</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[klownboy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2012 02:27:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=511451#comment-1711541</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My Steelers taking another tight end?  When we have Heath miller?  Really?  

Idiot...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My Steelers taking another tight end?  When we have Heath miller?  Really?  </p>
<p>Idiot&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: originalsteelcurtain</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/09/2012-mock-draft-take-two/#comment-1711533</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[originalsteelcurtain]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2012 02:21:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=511451#comment-1711533</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Lot&#039;s of anger and venom over  a mock draft?

Someone here rippin on Florio and it&#039;s not even his mock? Pay attention, this is Silva&#039;s mock.

The best mocksters - &quot;professionals&quot; don&#039;t even get 20% right on their best years. Don&#039;t pretend you can do any better.

I&#039;d love Fleener at #24 (Kuechly and Barron too but I can&#039;t see them being there), but Hightower, Glenn, Martin are more likely IMO.

Oh and Silva, I don&#039;t think you are an idiot!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lot&#8217;s of anger and venom over  a mock draft?</p>
<p>Someone here rippin on Florio and it&#8217;s not even his mock? Pay attention, this is Silva&#8217;s mock.</p>
<p>The best mocksters &#8211; &#8220;professionals&#8221; don&#8217;t even get 20% right on their best years. Don&#8217;t pretend you can do any better.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d love Fleener at #24 (Kuechly and Barron too but I can&#8217;t see them being there), but Hightower, Glenn, Martin are more likely IMO.</p>
<p>Oh and Silva, I don&#8217;t think you are an idiot!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: snoqualmieterry</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/09/2012-mock-draft-take-two/#comment-1711501</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[snoqualmieterry]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2012 01:51:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=511451#comment-1711501</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is the worst mock draft I have ever seen.  After the third pick, I don&#039;t agree with any of the selections.  For example, Kuechly going 32nd?  He will go 10 to 13.  Tannehill won&#039;t get past Miami.  The Seahawks will draft LB or DL not CB.  The Rams will draft WR if he is there.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is the worst mock draft I have ever seen.  After the third pick, I don&#8217;t agree with any of the selections.  For example, Kuechly going 32nd?  He will go 10 to 13.  Tannehill won&#8217;t get past Miami.  The Seahawks will draft LB or DL not CB.  The Rams will draft WR if he is there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: liddogg33</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/09/2012-mock-draft-take-two/#comment-1711494</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[liddogg33]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2012 01:46:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=511451#comment-1711494</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[notice i kept saying TRULY.. The hawks just resigned Marcus TRU-Fant!!!!! Guess their still taking the a Corner with the 12th pick!!!!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>notice i kept saying TRULY.. The hawks just resigned Marcus TRU-Fant!!!!! Guess their still taking the a Corner with the 12th pick!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: liddogg33</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/09/2012-mock-draft-take-two/#comment-1711493</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[liddogg33]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2012 01:45:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=511451#comment-1711493</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[R U KIDDING ME??? Seahawks take a cornerback in the first round??? What is truly amazing is this first rate IDIOT gets paid to write an article about something he is obviously CLUELESS ABOUT!!! It truly amazes me this guys would truly have this opinion!! No way he follows the NFL!!! Truly remarkable this clown still has a job!! Id switch him over to FUNNY PAGES]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>R U KIDDING ME??? Seahawks take a cornerback in the first round??? What is truly amazing is this first rate IDIOT gets paid to write an article about something he is obviously CLUELESS ABOUT!!! It truly amazes me this guys would truly have this opinion!! No way he follows the NFL!!! Truly remarkable this clown still has a job!! Id switch him over to FUNNY PAGES</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ivibaileyivi</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/09/2012-mock-draft-take-two/#comment-1711469</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ivibaileyivi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2012 01:32:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=511451#comment-1711469</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Who dat nation? You a Cheating, Sorry a@# nation AINTS.  It keeps getting better!!

***2009 SuperBowl ChUmpions New Orlean AINTS***]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who dat nation? You a Cheating, Sorry a@# nation AINTS.  It keeps getting better!!</p>
<p>***2009 SuperBowl ChUmpions New Orlean AINTS***</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: randallflagg52</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/09/2012-mock-draft-take-two/#comment-1711464</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[randallflagg52]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2012 01:27:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=511451#comment-1711464</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mock drafts are like a certain body oriface, everyone has one and they all stink.

But this one stands out above (below?) the rest.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mock drafts are like a certain body oriface, everyone has one and they all stink.</p>
<p>But this one stands out above (below?) the rest.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zerodime</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/09/2012-mock-draft-take-two/#comment-1711444</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[zerodime]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2012 01:18:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=511451#comment-1711444</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Weeden at 22?! Try Weeden at 67 or 100]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Weeden at 22?! Try Weeden at 67 or 100</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
