<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Goodell upholds suspensions of Payton, Loomis, Vitt</title>
	<atom:link href="http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/09/goodell-upholds-suspensions-of-payton-loomis-vitt/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/09/goodell-upholds-suspensions-of-payton-loomis-vitt/</link>
	<description>ProFootballTalk on NBCSports.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 05:11:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: mikejonesforum</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/09/goodell-upholds-suspensions-of-payton-loomis-vitt/#comment-1720731</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[mikejonesforum]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Apr 2012 00:16:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=511450#comment-1720731</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Octomom as interim head coach. Great move bc it eliminates welfare benefits that we have to pay for and she has a great place to store the challenge flag. The ratings will be record setting and provide an excellent 1st round pick next year. Sean doesn&#039;t have anything to worry about regarding Job security.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Octomom as interim head coach. Great move bc it eliminates welfare benefits that we have to pay for and she has a great place to store the challenge flag. The ratings will be record setting and provide an excellent 1st round pick next year. Sean doesn&#8217;t have anything to worry about regarding Job security.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bayoubauer</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/09/goodell-upholds-suspensions-of-payton-loomis-vitt/#comment-1712239</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[bayoubauer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2012 16:07:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=511450#comment-1712239</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[yojoemama says: 
Apr 10, 2012 12:13 AM 
The fact that they even tried an appeal is really asinine. C’mon the dude who played judge and jury to give you the penalties is now the appeal person. It’s like duh, do you think he’s going to undermine himself by changing his original decision???


It&#039;s like duh, jackass. They knew the appeals weren&#039;t going to be overturned. This was just a strategic move to buy a little extra time before the suspensions kicked in. The fact that you, along with others, still don&#039;t comprehend that fact, only further illustrates how clueless you are.


It&#039;s like duh? What are you, a 15 y.o. girl?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yojoemama says:<br />
Apr 10, 2012 12:13 AM<br />
The fact that they even tried an appeal is really asinine. C’mon the dude who played judge and jury to give you the penalties is now the appeal person. It’s like duh, do you think he’s going to undermine himself by changing his original decision???</p>
<p>It&#8217;s like duh, jackass. They knew the appeals weren&#8217;t going to be overturned. This was just a strategic move to buy a little extra time before the suspensions kicked in. The fact that you, along with others, still don&#8217;t comprehend that fact, only further illustrates how clueless you are.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s like duh? What are you, a 15 y.o. girl?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: drexelvol</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/09/goodell-upholds-suspensions-of-payton-loomis-vitt/#comment-1712033</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[drexelvol]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2012 14:32:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=511450#comment-1712033</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[LOL, Goodell gave as much consideration to the appeals as the parole board give Charles Manson.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LOL, Goodell gave as much consideration to the appeals as the parole board give Charles Manson.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cowboycjn</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/09/goodell-upholds-suspensions-of-payton-loomis-vitt/#comment-1711942</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[cowboycjn]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2012 13:53:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=511450#comment-1711942</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ravensgrl says: 
Apr 9, 2012 2:40 PM 
I don’t understand why he didn’t start the suspension immediately for Payton, since the original intention was for it to start 4/1/12.
 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 

I have written in several articles about theSaints when so many couldn&#039;t understand him appealing.  This was strickly a legal manuver to buy a lil more time with the team to plan things out.  None of em ever intended to have the suspensions reduced, they knew they were going to have to serve that time. It gave Payton 2 more weeks to set things in the plans for the up-coming season. They got exactly what was wanted - (a lil more time)   Its like any other appeal system - it stalls the process a lil while- thats all they wanted.  Whats so hard to understand about that?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ravensgrl says:<br />
Apr 9, 2012 2:40 PM<br />
I don’t understand why he didn’t start the suspension immediately for Payton, since the original intention was for it to start 4/1/12.<br />
 &#8211; - &#8211; - &#8211; - &#8211; - &#8211; - &#8211; - &#8211; - &#8211; - &#8211; - &#8211; - &#8211; - &#8211; - &#8211; - &#8211; - &#8211; - &#8211; - </p>
<p>I have written in several articles about theSaints when so many couldn&#8217;t understand him appealing.  This was strickly a legal manuver to buy a lil more time with the team to plan things out.  None of em ever intended to have the suspensions reduced, they knew they were going to have to serve that time. It gave Payton 2 more weeks to set things in the plans for the up-coming season. They got exactly what was wanted &#8211; (a lil more time)   Its like any other appeal system &#8211; it stalls the process a lil while- thats all they wanted.  Whats so hard to understand about that?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: forever9ers</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/09/goodell-upholds-suspensions-of-payton-loomis-vitt/#comment-1711678</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[forever9ers]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2012 07:01:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=511450#comment-1711678</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I am still waiting for an explanation to all these penalties! 

-Drew Bree-]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am still waiting for an explanation to all these penalties! </p>
<p>-Drew Bree-</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: yojoemama</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/09/goodell-upholds-suspensions-of-payton-loomis-vitt/#comment-1711617</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[yojoemama]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2012 04:13:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=511450#comment-1711617</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The fact that they even tried an appeal is really asinine.  C&#039;mon the dude who played judge and jury to give you the penalties is now the appeal person.  It&#039;s like duh, do you think he&#039;s going to undermine himself by changing his original decision???]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The fact that they even tried an appeal is really asinine.  C&#8217;mon the dude who played judge and jury to give you the penalties is now the appeal person.  It&#8217;s like duh, do you think he&#8217;s going to undermine himself by changing his original decision???</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: autumnwind12</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/09/goodell-upholds-suspensions-of-payton-loomis-vitt/#comment-1711465</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[autumnwind12]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2012 01:30:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=511450#comment-1711465</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[the guy should have been fired, he got off easy how do you not fire the head coach   everyone is disgusted with williams, payton new what was going on, and the fact he didn&#039;t do anything about it  is pretty gross!!!!! I&#039;ve lost all respect for payton]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the guy should have been fired, he got off easy how do you not fire the head coach   everyone is disgusted with williams, payton new what was going on, and the fact he didn&#8217;t do anything about it  is pretty gross!!!!! I&#8217;ve lost all respect for payton</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: effedinLA</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/09/goodell-upholds-suspensions-of-payton-loomis-vitt/#comment-1711187</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[effedinLA]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2012 22:13:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=511450#comment-1711187</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[genericuser8888 says:
Apr 9, 2012 2:28 PM
Man, it’s going to feel really weird when Goodell has to hand Bill Parcells the Lobardi this year.

But not too weird.  
++++++++++++++++++++++++

When did Parcells join the Packers?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>genericuser8888 says:<br />
Apr 9, 2012 2:28 PM<br />
Man, it’s going to feel really weird when Goodell has to hand Bill Parcells the Lobardi this year.</p>
<p>But not too weird.<br />
++++++++++++++++++++++++</p>
<p>When did Parcells join the Packers?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CKL</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/09/goodell-upholds-suspensions-of-payton-loomis-vitt/#comment-1711117</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CKL]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2012 21:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=511450#comment-1711117</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wisconsin77 says:
Apr 9, 2012 4:10 PM

Why don’t you ask Barry Bonds if that is all that matters? Respect of the fans is just as important, otherwise the accomplishment is meaningless.
__________________________________
As a fan, I believe that the most important things to people who play sports are some combination of money, championships and the respect of their PEERS and opposing coaches and GMs. Not us.  Sure some want adulation, and a lot of guys treat fans and media well because they are decent people or they like to maintain their image, but for the most part they realize that stuff is fleeting and  doesn&#039;t mean that much as far as their achievements. Can&#039;t say I disagree with that. Not too many people talk about what dbs guys like Babe Ruth and Ty Cobb were, do they? The further away in time guys played the less that matters, and it only &quot;matters&quot; now because of the internet, videophones, etc and instant accessibility of everything.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wisconsin77 says:<br />
Apr 9, 2012 4:10 PM</p>
<p>Why don’t you ask Barry Bonds if that is all that matters? Respect of the fans is just as important, otherwise the accomplishment is meaningless.<br />
__________________________________<br />
As a fan, I believe that the most important things to people who play sports are some combination of money, championships and the respect of their PEERS and opposing coaches and GMs. Not us.  Sure some want adulation, and a lot of guys treat fans and media well because they are decent people or they like to maintain their image, but for the most part they realize that stuff is fleeting and  doesn&#8217;t mean that much as far as their achievements. Can&#8217;t say I disagree with that. Not too many people talk about what dbs guys like Babe Ruth and Ty Cobb were, do they? The further away in time guys played the less that matters, and it only &#8220;matters&#8221; now because of the internet, videophones, etc and instant accessibility of everything.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: suhnum1fan</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/09/goodell-upholds-suspensions-of-payton-loomis-vitt/#comment-1711030</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[suhnum1fan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2012 20:48:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=511450#comment-1711030</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[GREAT JOB GOODELL!!!!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>GREAT JOB GOODELL!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wewantflagfootball</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/09/goodell-upholds-suspensions-of-payton-loomis-vitt/#comment-1711026</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[wewantflagfootball]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2012 20:47:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=511450#comment-1711026</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[hikohadon says: Apr 9, 2012 3:45 PM

All the Saints fans defending Payton et al is eerily similar to all the PSU fans defending Paterno and all the Steelers fans defending Roethlisberger.

Perception is massively skewed when adoration is involved.
==================================
Dumbest comment EVER. To compare this bounty BS to repeated child molestation over a 10 year period...oh my god...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hikohadon says: Apr 9, 2012 3:45 PM</p>
<p>All the Saints fans defending Payton et al is eerily similar to all the PSU fans defending Paterno and all the Steelers fans defending Roethlisberger.</p>
<p>Perception is massively skewed when adoration is involved.<br />
==================================<br />
Dumbest comment EVER. To compare this bounty BS to repeated child molestation over a 10 year period&#8230;oh my god&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: birds1414</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/09/goodell-upholds-suspensions-of-payton-loomis-vitt/#comment-1711003</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[birds1414]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2012 20:38:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=511450#comment-1711003</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I agree with most of you here, this may be one of the worst mocks this year I have read. Whoever this Evan guy is, you should not have a job, and I now know you never watch football or know how to evaluate talent..

Kuechly at 32 is the worst of this mock, he is a stud LB who is a guarantee in top 15

Brockers is close by you having him going top 5, he is raw and has upside, but he will not be picked that high in front of other DT

This is a waste of time and you should be fired..]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with most of you here, this may be one of the worst mocks this year I have read. Whoever this Evan guy is, you should not have a job, and I now know you never watch football or know how to evaluate talent..</p>
<p>Kuechly at 32 is the worst of this mock, he is a stud LB who is a guarantee in top 15</p>
<p>Brockers is close by you having him going top 5, he is raw and has upside, but he will not be picked that high in front of other DT</p>
<p>This is a waste of time and you should be fired..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wisconsin77</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/09/goodell-upholds-suspensions-of-payton-loomis-vitt/#comment-1710942</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wisconsin77]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2012 20:10:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=511450#comment-1710942</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[wewantflagfootball says: Apr 9, 2012 3:58 PM
The only one inserting an asterisk is your dumbass.
In the OFFICIAL NFL record books, there are no asterisks…..hahahahahahaha


Why don&#039;t you ask Barry Bonds if that is all that matters?  Respect of the fans is just as important, otherwise the accomplishment is meaningless.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>wewantflagfootball says: Apr 9, 2012 3:58 PM<br />
The only one inserting an asterisk is your dumbass.<br />
In the OFFICIAL NFL record books, there are no asterisks…..hahahahahahaha</p>
<p>Why don&#8217;t you ask Barry Bonds if that is all that matters?  Respect of the fans is just as important, otherwise the accomplishment is meaningless.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wewantflagfootball</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/09/goodell-upholds-suspensions-of-payton-loomis-vitt/#comment-1710914</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[wewantflagfootball]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2012 19:58:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=511450#comment-1710914</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wisconsin77 says: Apr 9, 2012 3:35 PM

Saints 2009 Season NFC Champs*
Saints 2009 Season Super bowl Champs*

=============================

The only one inserting an asterisk is your dumbass. 
In the OFFICIAL NFL record books, there are no asterisks.....hahahahahahaha]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wisconsin77 says: Apr 9, 2012 3:35 PM</p>
<p>Saints 2009 Season NFC Champs*<br />
Saints 2009 Season Super bowl Champs*</p>
<p>=============================</p>
<p>The only one inserting an asterisk is your dumbass.<br />
In the OFFICIAL NFL record books, there are no asterisks&#8230;..hahahahahahaha</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: purplegreenandgold</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/09/goodell-upholds-suspensions-of-payton-loomis-vitt/#comment-1710901</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[purplegreenandgold]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2012 19:51:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=511450#comment-1710901</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[philwauke says: Apr 9, 2012 1:48 PM

maybe now we’ll only get 3 stories a day about it.

====================================
i know however im shocked that MF didnt author this story since he seem to have xclusive rights. but then again he didnt author this story so u know there will b many to come like &quot;what does this decision mean for the saints&quot;, &quot; how do the saints move forward&quot;, &quot;signing drew brees is tpo priority for saints&quot;, &quot; looking at the nfc south for 2012&quot;, &quot;will other defensive coaches not reward players with game balls &quot;
sorry to say this but it will not stop on this site because &quot; clicks&quot; = $$$]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>philwauke says: Apr 9, 2012 1:48 PM</p>
<p>maybe now we’ll only get 3 stories a day about it.</p>
<p>====================================<br />
i know however im shocked that MF didnt author this story since he seem to have xclusive rights. but then again he didnt author this story so u know there will b many to come like &#8220;what does this decision mean for the saints&#8221;, &#8221; how do the saints move forward&#8221;, &#8220;signing drew brees is tpo priority for saints&#8221;, &#8221; looking at the nfc south for 2012&#8243;, &#8220;will other defensive coaches not reward players with game balls &#8221;<br />
sorry to say this but it will not stop on this site because &#8221; clicks&#8221; = $$$</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ravensgrl</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/09/goodell-upholds-suspensions-of-payton-loomis-vitt/#comment-1710895</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ravensgrl]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2012 19:48:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=511450#comment-1710895</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[detruthhurts says: 
Apr 9, 2012 3:04 PM 
BS witch hunt…anybody connected with the game knows this is just one team being punished for what every single team has done since football was invented. Thought crimes, and not one single player actually hurt, and no “bounties” collected…

Bounties were collected. The truth DOES hurt, doesn&#039;t it?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>detruthhurts says:<br />
Apr 9, 2012 3:04 PM<br />
BS witch hunt…anybody connected with the game knows this is just one team being punished for what every single team has done since football was invented. Thought crimes, and not one single player actually hurt, and no “bounties” collected…</p>
<p>Bounties were collected. The truth DOES hurt, doesn&#8217;t it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: toolkien</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/09/goodell-upholds-suspensions-of-payton-loomis-vitt/#comment-1710892</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[toolkien]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2012 19:47:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=511450#comment-1710892</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If Goodell has too much power, he only has the powers defined by the owners. If the owners would like to have three branches, they can accomplish that with ease. The owners have a commissioner for a reason, and he is fulfilling that reason, presumably to the owners&#039; satisfaction. Can anyone doubt the punishment Goodell handed down wasn&#039;t approved by some sort of executive council of owners, whose team would be held to the same standard? If Goodell put on boots too big for him, he&#039;d get the drift real quick. The NFL isn&#039;t a democracy, and Goodell isn&#039;t elected. The NFL is an oligocracy and Goodell is a prime minister of the oligarchs. When he operates outside the wishes of the majority faction of the oligarchs, his tenure will be over.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If Goodell has too much power, he only has the powers defined by the owners. If the owners would like to have three branches, they can accomplish that with ease. The owners have a commissioner for a reason, and he is fulfilling that reason, presumably to the owners&#8217; satisfaction. Can anyone doubt the punishment Goodell handed down wasn&#8217;t approved by some sort of executive council of owners, whose team would be held to the same standard? If Goodell put on boots too big for him, he&#8217;d get the drift real quick. The NFL isn&#8217;t a democracy, and Goodell isn&#8217;t elected. The NFL is an oligocracy and Goodell is a prime minister of the oligarchs. When he operates outside the wishes of the majority faction of the oligarchs, his tenure will be over.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hikohadon</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/09/goodell-upholds-suspensions-of-payton-loomis-vitt/#comment-1710882</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[hikohadon]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2012 19:45:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=511450#comment-1710882</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[All the Saints fans defending Payton et al is eerily similar to all the PSU fans defending Paterno and all the Steelers fans defending Roethlisberger.

Perception is massively skewed when adoration is involved.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All the Saints fans defending Payton et al is eerily similar to all the PSU fans defending Paterno and all the Steelers fans defending Roethlisberger.</p>
<p>Perception is massively skewed when adoration is involved.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rsmca</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/09/goodell-upholds-suspensions-of-payton-loomis-vitt/#comment-1710871</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[rsmca]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2012 19:40:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=511450#comment-1710871</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I am in favor and support the punishments handed out to the individuals involved.  

I am not in favor of the loss of draft picks - that has the impact of extending this punishment long into the future.  The major losers of this extended punishment will be the fans of Saints.   If the commissioner feels that the team requires additional punishment it should be in the form of $$$.  ($5 million ??)

It is unfortunate that the Saints fans have to share in this punishment through the loss of a season but let&#039;s not carry this punishment beyond this year.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am in favor and support the punishments handed out to the individuals involved.  </p>
<p>I am not in favor of the loss of draft picks &#8211; that has the impact of extending this punishment long into the future.  The major losers of this extended punishment will be the fans of Saints.   If the commissioner feels that the team requires additional punishment it should be in the form of $$$.  ($5 million ??)</p>
<p>It is unfortunate that the Saints fans have to share in this punishment through the loss of a season but let&#8217;s not carry this punishment beyond this year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kungfubillysims</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/09/goodell-upholds-suspensions-of-payton-loomis-vitt/#comment-1710862</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[kungfubillysims]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2012 19:37:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=511450#comment-1710862</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Good. Now Payton can start actually taking responsibility for his actions instead of just saying that he does. Too bad the suspensions weren&#039;t lengthened really.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good. Now Payton can start actually taking responsibility for his actions instead of just saying that he does. Too bad the suspensions weren&#8217;t lengthened really.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wisconsin77</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/09/goodell-upholds-suspensions-of-payton-loomis-vitt/#comment-1710858</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wisconsin77]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2012 19:35:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=511450#comment-1710858</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Saints 2009 Season NFC Champs*
Saints 2009 Season Super bowl Champs*]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Saints 2009 Season NFC Champs*<br />
Saints 2009 Season Super bowl Champs*</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: westclaims</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/09/goodell-upholds-suspensions-of-payton-loomis-vitt/#comment-1710855</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[westclaims]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2012 19:34:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=511450#comment-1710855</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Good, I love it]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good, I love it</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: goodolebaghead</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/09/goodell-upholds-suspensions-of-payton-loomis-vitt/#comment-1710849</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[goodolebaghead]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2012 19:32:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=511450#comment-1710849</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If anybody thought the appeals were anything else, besides a time extender for Sean to get his business in order, you&#039;re an idiot.  Of course he knew he was guilty, but if you can buy another couple weeks to settle affairs before you are kicked from the building, why not?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If anybody thought the appeals were anything else, besides a time extender for Sean to get his business in order, you&#8217;re an idiot.  Of course he knew he was guilty, but if you can buy another couple weeks to settle affairs before you are kicked from the building, why not?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jimr10</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/09/goodell-upholds-suspensions-of-payton-loomis-vitt/#comment-1710845</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jimr10]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2012 19:31:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=511450#comment-1710845</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here comes  a lawsuit from the most classless and arrogant coach in the NFL.. He will ultimately ruin his own career..
doubt mike will let this post get on.. he almost always censors mine...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here comes  a lawsuit from the most classless and arrogant coach in the NFL.. He will ultimately ruin his own career..<br />
doubt mike will let this post get on.. he almost always censors mine&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: klunge</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/09/goodell-upholds-suspensions-of-payton-loomis-vitt/#comment-1710841</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[klunge]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2012 19:28:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=511450#comment-1710841</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[sirblitzalot15 says: 
Apr 9, 2012 2:27 PM 
Sorry but the proof is on the field, I don’t care how many people Greg brought up in his rant, the players still didn’t Target players and eliminate them from games.
--------------------------------------------------

Who says they didn&#039;t target other players??? Just because they weren&#039;t always successful doesn&#039;t mean they weren&#039;t trying, or that they shouldn&#039;t be punished.

It&#039;s in keeping with basic tenets of justice. If you try to murder someone and fail, you can still go to prison! What? Yes, it&#039;s totally true, it&#039;s called &quot;ATTEMPTED murder&quot;, and it&#039;s considered pretty serious. A person who tries to commit any crime and botches it up is still guilty of a crime.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>sirblitzalot15 says:<br />
Apr 9, 2012 2:27 PM<br />
Sorry but the proof is on the field, I don’t care how many people Greg brought up in his rant, the players still didn’t Target players and eliminate them from games.<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;</p>
<p>Who says they didn&#8217;t target other players??? Just because they weren&#8217;t always successful doesn&#8217;t mean they weren&#8217;t trying, or that they shouldn&#8217;t be punished.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s in keeping with basic tenets of justice. If you try to murder someone and fail, you can still go to prison! What? Yes, it&#8217;s totally true, it&#8217;s called &#8220;ATTEMPTED murder&#8221;, and it&#8217;s considered pretty serious. A person who tries to commit any crime and botches it up is still guilty of a crime.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jackntorres</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/09/goodell-upholds-suspensions-of-payton-loomis-vitt/#comment-1710837</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jackntorres]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2012 19:27:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=511450#comment-1710837</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hey guess what else was upheld...

Super Bowl XLIV]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey guess what else was upheld&#8230;</p>
<p>Super Bowl XLIV</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jackntorres</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/09/goodell-upholds-suspensions-of-payton-loomis-vitt/#comment-1710836</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jackntorres]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2012 19:27:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=511450#comment-1710836</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hey guess what is was upheld...

Super Bowl XLIV]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey guess what is was upheld&#8230;</p>
<p>Super Bowl XLIV</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jackntorres</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/09/goodell-upholds-suspensions-of-payton-loomis-vitt/#comment-1710831</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jackntorres]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2012 19:26:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=511450#comment-1710831</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I once read:

Especially at the quarterback position, any opportunity to knock the starter out of the game should be embraced.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I once read:</p>
<p>Especially at the quarterback position, any opportunity to knock the starter out of the game should be embraced.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: amaf21</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/09/goodell-upholds-suspensions-of-payton-loomis-vitt/#comment-1710827</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[amaf21]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2012 19:23:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=511450#comment-1710827</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[what a crock!  the commish should&#039;ve hammered their blabber mouths even more after that williams tape came out!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>what a crock!  the commish should&#8217;ve hammered their blabber mouths even more after that williams tape came out!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hystoracle</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/09/goodell-upholds-suspensions-of-payton-loomis-vitt/#comment-1710825</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[hystoracle]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2012 19:23:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=511450#comment-1710825</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;Upon further review, the play stands as called!&quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Upon further review, the play stands as called!&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
