<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Saints will still have a significant draft-pick penalty in 2013</title>
	<atom:link href="http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/09/saints-will-still-have-a-significant-draft-pick-penalty-in-2013/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/09/saints-will-still-have-a-significant-draft-pick-penalty-in-2013/</link>
	<description>ProFootballTalk on NBCSports.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 17:59:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: rex1979</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/09/saints-will-still-have-a-significant-draft-pick-penalty-in-2013/#comment-1711757</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[rex1979]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2012 11:48:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=511518#comment-1711757</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Kill the head and the body will follow]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kill the head and the body will follow</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: andyb02</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/09/saints-will-still-have-a-significant-draft-pick-penalty-in-2013/#comment-1711687</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[andyb02]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2012 07:43:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=511518#comment-1711687</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just take their 1st round pick next year and be done with it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just take their 1st round pick next year and be done with it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: patsaintsbroncoscheat</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/09/saints-will-still-have-a-significant-draft-pick-penalty-in-2013/#comment-1711635</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[patsaintsbroncoscheat]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2012 04:39:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=511518#comment-1711635</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So glad the owners realize how awesome Goodell is. They should sell Goodell jerseys in all team colors. I want his autograph.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So glad the owners realize how awesome Goodell is. They should sell Goodell jerseys in all team colors. I want his autograph.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: patsaintsbroncoscheat</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/09/saints-will-still-have-a-significant-draft-pick-penalty-in-2013/#comment-1711630</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[patsaintsbroncoscheat]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2012 04:35:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=511518#comment-1711630</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ouch! For some people&#039;s info the bounty system does constitute cheating. Being from Nawlins you might have a warped view on the subject of cheating. Just take our word for it: playing with a bounty is against the rules and therefore it is considered cheating. So *]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ouch! For some people&#8217;s info the bounty system does constitute cheating. Being from Nawlins you might have a warped view on the subject of cheating. Just take our word for it: playing with a bounty is against the rules and therefore it is considered cheating. So *</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: banjostang</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/09/saints-will-still-have-a-significant-draft-pick-penalty-in-2013/#comment-1711577</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[banjostang]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2012 03:18:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=511518#comment-1711577</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The NFL needs to create a professional standards board to review, adjudicate and respond to appeals on all personnel issues to include fines, penalties, suspensions and standards.  One person cannot properly perform these all these functions for the NFL.  The Commissioner is the wrong person for this.
This is a mulit-billion dollar industry; it needs to change as it grows.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The NFL needs to create a professional standards board to review, adjudicate and respond to appeals on all personnel issues to include fines, penalties, suspensions and standards.  One person cannot properly perform these all these functions for the NFL.  The Commissioner is the wrong person for this.<br />
This is a mulit-billion dollar industry; it needs to change as it grows.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: neilnixon</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/09/saints-will-still-have-a-significant-draft-pick-penalty-in-2013/#comment-1711536</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[neilnixon]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2012 02:23:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=511518#comment-1711536</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Lostock, the &quot;offending&quot; Saints should be and have been punished....the most severe suspensions in NFL History.

But still haven&#039;t heard anyone provide a rationale for Goodell stripping away the draft choices and what they have to do with the crimes???  Should a Commissioner have the right to affect a team&#039;s future performance for past actions AFTER he&#039;s already penalized those responsible?  Isn&#039;t that a rather dangerous precedent??

The silence is deafening!!!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lostock, the &#8220;offending&#8221; Saints should be and have been punished&#8230;.the most severe suspensions in NFL History.</p>
<p>But still haven&#8217;t heard anyone provide a rationale for Goodell stripping away the draft choices and what they have to do with the crimes???  Should a Commissioner have the right to affect a team&#8217;s future performance for past actions AFTER he&#8217;s already penalized those responsible?  Isn&#8217;t that a rather dangerous precedent??</p>
<p>The silence is deafening!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lostsok</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/09/saints-will-still-have-a-significant-draft-pick-penalty-in-2013/#comment-1711478</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[lostsok]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2012 01:37:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=511518#comment-1711478</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There&#039;s an old saying: never commit a felony to cover up a misdemeanor. What Saint fans don&#039;t get is that the reason their team is being hammered is their arrogant lack of acknowledgement to the league initially, and their resistance to change their clearly acceptable culture.  

The had a chance to come clean...they chose to stay dirty.  And, in doing so, earned every ounce of scorn now being heaped upon them.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s an old saying: never commit a felony to cover up a misdemeanor. What Saint fans don&#8217;t get is that the reason their team is being hammered is their arrogant lack of acknowledgement to the league initially, and their resistance to change their clearly acceptable culture.  </p>
<p>The had a chance to come clean&#8230;they chose to stay dirty.  And, in doing so, earned every ounce of scorn now being heaped upon them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ivibaileyivi</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/09/saints-will-still-have-a-significant-draft-pick-penalty-in-2013/#comment-1711468</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ivibaileyivi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2012 01:31:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=511518#comment-1711468</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Who dat nation? You a Cheating, Sorry a@# nation AINTS.  It keeps getting better!!

***2009 SuperBowl ChUmpions New Orlean AINTS***]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who dat nation? You a Cheating, Sorry a@# nation AINTS.  It keeps getting better!!</p>
<p>***2009 SuperBowl ChUmpions New Orlean AINTS***</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: goodolebaghead</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/09/saints-will-still-have-a-significant-draft-pick-penalty-in-2013/#comment-1711265</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[goodolebaghead]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2012 23:18:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=511518#comment-1711265</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With the Saints so limited as so many of you think they will be, it&#039;s gonna look that much worse for your teams when they still beat them.  You&#039;ll have no excuses then.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With the Saints so limited as so many of you think they will be, it&#8217;s gonna look that much worse for your teams when they still beat them.  You&#8217;ll have no excuses then.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: neilnixon</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/09/saints-will-still-have-a-significant-draft-pick-penalty-in-2013/#comment-1711262</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[neilnixon]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2012 23:15:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=511518#comment-1711262</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Baddegg writes &quot;the punishment should fit the crime&quot; and I agree completely.

So tell me: What do draft picks have to do with &quot;Bounty Gate&quot; anyway????  Williams set this up: he&#039;s suspended.  Payton, Loomis, Vitt let it go on: suspended. Why should the Commissioner hurt the on-field future of the team for past actions when he&#039;s already penalized...very harshly...those who did the dirty deeds? There&#039;s at least 35 other players on that team that weren&#039;t involved, so why penalize them...or the fans (who still have to pay full price for their tickets) by taking away draft picks and potentially hurting the team&#039;s future performance?  Affecting the competitive balance of the league is WAY BEYOND what a Commissioner should be able to do.  

It&#039;s like a high school suspending your kid for bad behavior and trying to garnish the parent&#039;s future wages.

Other than vindictiveness and Goodell wanting to make sure the team&#039;s future performance is impacted as much as possible, can somebody PLEASE somebody enlighten me with the rationale for taking away future draft picks for past actions when you&#039;ve already harshly penalized those responsble?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Baddegg writes &#8220;the punishment should fit the crime&#8221; and I agree completely.</p>
<p>So tell me: What do draft picks have to do with &#8220;Bounty Gate&#8221; anyway????  Williams set this up: he&#8217;s suspended.  Payton, Loomis, Vitt let it go on: suspended. Why should the Commissioner hurt the on-field future of the team for past actions when he&#8217;s already penalized&#8230;very harshly&#8230;those who did the dirty deeds? There&#8217;s at least 35 other players on that team that weren&#8217;t involved, so why penalize them&#8230;or the fans (who still have to pay full price for their tickets) by taking away draft picks and potentially hurting the team&#8217;s future performance?  Affecting the competitive balance of the league is WAY BEYOND what a Commissioner should be able to do.  </p>
<p>It&#8217;s like a high school suspending your kid for bad behavior and trying to garnish the parent&#8217;s future wages.</p>
<p>Other than vindictiveness and Goodell wanting to make sure the team&#8217;s future performance is impacted as much as possible, can somebody PLEASE somebody enlighten me with the rationale for taking away future draft picks for past actions when you&#8217;ve already harshly penalized those responsble?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sfsaintsfan</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/09/saints-will-still-have-a-significant-draft-pick-penalty-in-2013/#comment-1711248</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[sfsaintsfan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2012 23:07:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=511518#comment-1711248</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Saints second round pick next year will be #32 in the second round, #64 overall.

Roger can have it after he hands over the Lombardi Trophy again.....]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Saints second round pick next year will be #32 in the second round, #64 overall.</p>
<p>Roger can have it after he hands over the Lombardi Trophy again&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: truthhurtstoo</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/09/saints-will-still-have-a-significant-draft-pick-penalty-in-2013/#comment-1711216</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[truthhurtstoo]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2012 22:37:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=511518#comment-1711216</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[back to the good old Aint&#039;s. Hope you all kept your bags for your heads... players are next!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>back to the good old Aint&#8217;s. Hope you all kept your bags for your heads&#8230; players are next!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stratus5ss</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/09/saints-will-still-have-a-significant-draft-pick-penalty-in-2013/#comment-1711175</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[stratus5ss]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2012 22:08:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=511518#comment-1711175</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think enough is enough. You have punished the Saints. Don&#039;t punish their fans. Any further penalties would be vindictive.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think enough is enough. You have punished the Saints. Don&#8217;t punish their fans. Any further penalties would be vindictive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: credible316</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/09/saints-will-still-have-a-significant-draft-pick-penalty-in-2013/#comment-1711173</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[credible316]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2012 22:07:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=511518#comment-1711173</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[medtxpack says: Apr 9, 2012 3:43 PM

as least they already have* a MVP* quarterback…

----------------

Really, when did he sign? Last I heard he not amused with his franchise tag and was considering holding out the entire season.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>medtxpack says: Apr 9, 2012 3:43 PM</p>
<p>as least they already have* a MVP* quarterback…</p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-</p>
<p>Really, when did he sign? Last I heard he not amused with his franchise tag and was considering holding out the entire season.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: baddegg</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/09/saints-will-still-have-a-significant-draft-pick-penalty-in-2013/#comment-1711144</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[baddegg]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2012 21:50:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=511518#comment-1711144</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is not fair.  The punishment should fit the crime, not be lightened because the Saints &quot;start following the rules.&quot;

So, by the NFL&#039;s logic, if the Redskins and Cowboys stay within the cap this year, should they be &quot;given back some cap space next year?&quot;  That&#039;s the analogy.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is not fair.  The punishment should fit the crime, not be lightened because the Saints &#8220;start following the rules.&#8221;</p>
<p>So, by the NFL&#8217;s logic, if the Redskins and Cowboys stay within the cap this year, should they be &#8220;given back some cap space next year?&#8221;  That&#8217;s the analogy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: iamthorny</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/09/saints-will-still-have-a-significant-draft-pick-penalty-in-2013/#comment-1711121</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[iamthorny]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2012 21:38:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=511518#comment-1711121</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Why don&#039;t they just hire Ditka and let the draft pick penalty work itself out naturally?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why don&#8217;t they just hire Ditka and let the draft pick penalty work itself out naturally?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fusion3450</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/09/saints-will-still-have-a-significant-draft-pick-penalty-in-2013/#comment-1711097</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[fusion3450]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2012 21:23:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=511518#comment-1711097</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[for you haters not knowing what you are talking about..by all means, go right on and take our 1st rd pick this year..ha. people need to get a life. who cares what YOU wanted them to be punished with.  seriously dude]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>for you haters not knowing what you are talking about..by all means, go right on and take our 1st rd pick this year..ha. people need to get a life. who cares what YOU wanted them to be punished with.  seriously dude</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: saints4evah</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/09/saints-will-still-have-a-significant-draft-pick-penalty-in-2013/#comment-1711056</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[saints4evah]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2012 21:02:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=511518#comment-1711056</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Witch hunt. Highly punished for s coach&#039;s trash talk and one player&#039;s idiocy of offering 10,000 for taking a qB out, which did not happen. I guess now Deangelo Hall eill be punished right? Tony siragusa? This is ridiculous. 
We STILL gonna kick some a** this year.
Who Dat 4 Evah!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Witch hunt. Highly punished for s coach&#8217;s trash talk and one player&#8217;s idiocy of offering 10,000 for taking a qB out, which did not happen. I guess now Deangelo Hall eill be punished right? Tony siragusa? This is ridiculous.<br />
We STILL gonna kick some a** this year.<br />
Who Dat 4 Evah!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bozosforall</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/09/saints-will-still-have-a-significant-draft-pick-penalty-in-2013/#comment-1711046</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[bozosforall]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2012 20:59:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=511518#comment-1711046</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[matthewcarlson1 says: 
Apr 9, 2012 3:47 PM 
Words can’t even express how angry this makes me. Do they really think a 2nd rounder is a good enough punishment. Take their first and second this year and be done with it.

__
Yes, please take their first rounder this year...especially since it currently belongs to the Patriots (traded so that the Saints could draft Mark Ingram).  That would add an additional punishment for the Spygate scandal and correct a gross underpunishment of the Pats for getting caught cheating.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>matthewcarlson1 says:<br />
Apr 9, 2012 3:47 PM<br />
Words can’t even express how angry this makes me. Do they really think a 2nd rounder is a good enough punishment. Take their first and second this year and be done with it.</p>
<p>__<br />
Yes, please take their first rounder this year&#8230;especially since it currently belongs to the Patriots (traded so that the Saints could draft Mark Ingram).  That would add an additional punishment for the Spygate scandal and correct a gross underpunishment of the Pats for getting caught cheating.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tilafoo</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/09/saints-will-still-have-a-significant-draft-pick-penalty-in-2013/#comment-1711040</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[tilafoo]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2012 20:55:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=511518#comment-1711040</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I love how mad this makes everyone hahaha.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love how mad this makes everyone hahaha.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: leatherhelmets</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/09/saints-will-still-have-a-significant-draft-pick-penalty-in-2013/#comment-1711008</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[leatherhelmets]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2012 20:41:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=511518#comment-1711008</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What does Sapp think  about all of this?  Kill the wrong messenger and then defend the right one?  Maybe he can decide what draft picks the Saints give up and provide a logical two sided explanation for it]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What does Sapp think  about all of this?  Kill the wrong messenger and then defend the right one?  Maybe he can decide what draft picks the Saints give up and provide a logical two sided explanation for it</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: utilawhodatfan</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/09/saints-will-still-have-a-significant-draft-pick-penalty-in-2013/#comment-1710988</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[utilawhodatfan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2012 20:30:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=511518#comment-1710988</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I agree the saints should be punished for their actions, but to all of you who are crying about these hits and saying Goddell should be harder on them, I would like to know just how many of you will still watch football when it become the National Touch Football League. Big hits are a part of the game and personally I think Goddell is trying to make it a PANSY sport!!! WHO DAT!!!_]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree the saints should be punished for their actions, but to all of you who are crying about these hits and saying Goddell should be harder on them, I would like to know just how many of you will still watch football when it become the National Touch Football League. Big hits are a part of the game and personally I think Goddell is trying to make it a PANSY sport!!! WHO DAT!!!_</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pa1856</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/09/saints-will-still-have-a-significant-draft-pick-penalty-in-2013/#comment-1710981</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[pa1856]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2012 20:25:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=511518#comment-1710981</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m sure any team out there would settle for losing a couple of draft picks for a superbowl title. New Orleans got a break here.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m sure any team out there would settle for losing a couple of draft picks for a superbowl title. New Orleans got a break here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: franktherat96</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/09/saints-will-still-have-a-significant-draft-pick-penalty-in-2013/#comment-1710980</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[franktherat96]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2012 20:24:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=511518#comment-1710980</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[jonny42671 says: 
Apr 9, 2012 3:40 PM 
And the ASTERISK next to their TAINTED Championship

_______________________

LMAO!  You people are the only ones putting an asterisk next to our Championship and quite frankly I don&#039;t really care about your opinion.

Super Bowl XLIV Champions!  Go Saints!!!  Who Dat!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>jonny42671 says:<br />
Apr 9, 2012 3:40 PM<br />
And the ASTERISK next to their TAINTED Championship</p>
<p>_______________________</p>
<p>LMAO!  You people are the only ones putting an asterisk next to our Championship and quite frankly I don&#8217;t really care about your opinion.</p>
<p>Super Bowl XLIV Champions!  Go Saints!!!  Who Dat!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kathyisintheroom</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/09/saints-will-still-have-a-significant-draft-pick-penalty-in-2013/#comment-1710977</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[kathyisintheroom]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2012 20:24:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=511518#comment-1710977</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[HAHA

Saints winning the PR battle against Goodell.

He will lower all the financial penalties, and reduce the draft pick hit for next year. All the saints have to do is run around and say nice things about Goodell and say how wrong it is for bounties.

Goodell doesn&#039;t want the wrath of New Orleans coming down on him before the Super Bowl or that fiasco in Dallas will be nothing compared to the devastation Louisiana will heap upon Super Bowl week.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>HAHA</p>
<p>Saints winning the PR battle against Goodell.</p>
<p>He will lower all the financial penalties, and reduce the draft pick hit for next year. All the saints have to do is run around and say nice things about Goodell and say how wrong it is for bounties.</p>
<p>Goodell doesn&#8217;t want the wrath of New Orleans coming down on him before the Super Bowl or that fiasco in Dallas will be nothing compared to the devastation Louisiana will heap upon Super Bowl week.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: duece5</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/09/saints-will-still-have-a-significant-draft-pick-penalty-in-2013/#comment-1710972</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[duece5]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2012 20:22:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=511518#comment-1710972</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Self inflicted, self destructing saints........what was a good story for the NFL, now, they are such a joke and despicable.

All the dopes (aints fans) who start to ramble like it is &quot;us against the world&quot; need to GET A CLUE.

YOU DID IT TO YOURSELF.....FOR 3 FREAKING YEARS!!!!!!!

We just want your joke of an owner, joke of a gm, joke of a head coach to go away for another 40 years!!!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Self inflicted, self destructing saints&#8230;&#8230;..what was a good story for the NFL, now, they are such a joke and despicable.</p>
<p>All the dopes (aints fans) who start to ramble like it is &#8220;us against the world&#8221; need to GET A CLUE.</p>
<p>YOU DID IT TO YOURSELF&#8230;..FOR 3 FREAKING YEARS!!!!!!!</p>
<p>We just want your joke of an owner, joke of a gm, joke of a head coach to go away for another 40 years!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alaricsrevenge</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/09/saints-will-still-have-a-significant-draft-pick-penalty-in-2013/#comment-1710970</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[alaricsrevenge]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2012 20:22:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=511518#comment-1710970</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Pete Rose &gt; Gregg Williams]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pete Rose &gt; Gregg Williams</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jdandcoke</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/09/saints-will-still-have-a-significant-draft-pick-penalty-in-2013/#comment-1710968</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jdandcoke]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2012 20:21:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=511518#comment-1710968</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[the saints do not have a first rounder this year; they traded it last year to the pats so they could draft ingram.....lets get with the program people.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the saints do not have a first rounder this year; they traded it last year to the pats so they could draft ingram&#8230;..lets get with the program people.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thankheavenfornumberseven</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/09/saints-will-still-have-a-significant-draft-pick-penalty-in-2013/#comment-1710963</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[thankheavenfornumberseven]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2012 20:17:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=511518#comment-1710963</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When the Timberwolves signed Joe Smith to an illegal contract, the NBA suspended the owner and GM for a year and took away the next FIVE first-round draft choices! They later returned two, but that&#039;s still three first-round picks in five years, in a league where anyone picked after the first round has virtually no chance of helping the team. So I don&#039;t see losing two second-round picks as being too much of a punishment.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When the Timberwolves signed Joe Smith to an illegal contract, the NBA suspended the owner and GM for a year and took away the next FIVE first-round draft choices! They later returned two, but that&#8217;s still three first-round picks in five years, in a league where anyone picked after the first round has virtually no chance of helping the team. So I don&#8217;t see losing two second-round picks as being too much of a punishment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dan7800</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/09/saints-will-still-have-a-significant-draft-pick-penalty-in-2013/#comment-1710956</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[dan7800]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2012 20:16:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=511518#comment-1710956</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just like the Patriots * next to their 2007 championship year.

Oh, wait.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just like the Patriots * next to their 2007 championship year.</p>
<p>Oh, wait.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
