<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: No progress between Welker, Pats</title>
	<atom:link href="http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/11/no-progress-between-welker-pats/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/11/no-progress-between-welker-pats/</link>
	<description>ProFootballTalk on NBCSports.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 21:41:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: i10east</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/11/no-progress-between-welker-pats/#comment-1716177</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[i10east]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2012 17:46:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=524623#comment-1716177</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Pay the man!!! Why is this franchise so cheap?!!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pay the man!!! Why is this franchise so cheap?!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tigerlilac</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/11/no-progress-between-welker-pats/#comment-1716073</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[tigerlilac]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2012 16:43:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=524623#comment-1716073</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[bozosforall says: 
Apr 12, 2012 10:07 AM 

Didn&#039;t the nuns teach you that the way to deal with your Bill Belichick fetish was to wear sandpaper mittens to bed?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>bozosforall says:<br />
Apr 12, 2012 10:07 AM </p>
<p>Didn&#8217;t the nuns teach you that the way to deal with your Bill Belichick fetish was to wear sandpaper mittens to bed?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cannonballdookie</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/11/no-progress-between-welker-pats/#comment-1715982</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[cannonballdookie]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2012 16:03:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=524623#comment-1715982</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[May as well let him go, they got a motivated Ochocinco coming into camp this year... hahahahahaha!!!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>May as well let him go, they got a motivated Ochocinco coming into camp this year&#8230; hahahahahaha!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: patsfiend</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/11/no-progress-between-welker-pats/#comment-1715943</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[patsfiend]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2012 15:49:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=524623#comment-1715943</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[lightofkolob says:
Apr 12, 2012 12:29 AM
Well if they refused to take care of Randy Moss….
--------
... yeah, and obviously that was a bad move, as Moss has about 10 catches since they let him go.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>lightofkolob says:<br />
Apr 12, 2012 12:29 AM<br />
Well if they refused to take care of Randy Moss….<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;<br />
&#8230; yeah, and obviously that was a bad move, as Moss has about 10 catches since they let him go.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: xxsweepthelegxx</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/11/no-progress-between-welker-pats/#comment-1715922</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[xxsweepthelegxx]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2012 15:42:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=524623#comment-1715922</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[randallflagg52 says: 
Apr 12, 2012 10:16 AM 
Pats fans better hope they get him resigned. Belichick is pretty bad in his drafts. Yeah he got those 2 TE’s but what else lately?

An annual defensive back bust in the first 2 rounds, and bi annually WR bust, and QBs who don’t even get activated for games and can’t beat a UDFA out as a backup. You figure they’d trade some of their 30 draft picks to move up and get some real talent.
----------------------------
While I tend to agree overall with your assessment of Belechick&#039;s drafts as of late, he has had some gems too. And the Pats just went to the SB again, so lets not all act like they&#039;ve gone 4-12 that last couple seasons.  If Mayo/McCourtey didn&#039;t regress so much we all may be sining a diff tune. Barring injuries, it will be fun to see how Ridley, Vereen, Ras Dowling, Spikes and Co turn out this year.  I say they take a flyer on J.Jenkins in the draft if he falls, the Pats have enough veteran/coaching leadership to give it a try.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>randallflagg52 says:<br />
Apr 12, 2012 10:16 AM<br />
Pats fans better hope they get him resigned. Belichick is pretty bad in his drafts. Yeah he got those 2 TE’s but what else lately?</p>
<p>An annual defensive back bust in the first 2 rounds, and bi annually WR bust, and QBs who don’t even get activated for games and can’t beat a UDFA out as a backup. You figure they’d trade some of their 30 draft picks to move up and get some real talent.<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-<br />
While I tend to agree overall with your assessment of Belechick&#8217;s drafts as of late, he has had some gems too. And the Pats just went to the SB again, so lets not all act like they&#8217;ve gone 4-12 that last couple seasons.  If Mayo/McCourtey didn&#8217;t regress so much we all may be sining a diff tune. Barring injuries, it will be fun to see how Ridley, Vereen, Ras Dowling, Spikes and Co turn out this year.  I say they take a flyer on J.Jenkins in the draft if he falls, the Pats have enough veteran/coaching leadership to give it a try.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jnbnet</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/11/no-progress-between-welker-pats/#comment-1715726</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jnbnet]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2012 14:26:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=524623#comment-1715726</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[irishgary says: 
Apr 12, 2012 7:14 AM 
Welker knows his team is on the downslide.

---------------------------------------------------------
We have been hearing that for the last six years.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>irishgary says:<br />
Apr 12, 2012 7:14 AM<br />
Welker knows his team is on the downslide.</p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;<br />
We have been hearing that for the last six years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: randallflagg52</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/11/no-progress-between-welker-pats/#comment-1715706</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[randallflagg52]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2012 14:16:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=524623#comment-1715706</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Pats fans better hope they get him resigned. Belichick is pretty bad in his drafts. Yeah he got those 2 TE&#039;s but what else lately?

An annual defensive back bust in the first 2 rounds, and bi annually WR bust, and QBs who don&#039;t even get activated for games and can&#039;t beat a UDFA out as a backup. You figure they&#039;d trade some of their 30 draft picks to move up and get some real talent.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pats fans better hope they get him resigned. Belichick is pretty bad in his drafts. Yeah he got those 2 TE&#8217;s but what else lately?</p>
<p>An annual defensive back bust in the first 2 rounds, and bi annually WR bust, and QBs who don&#8217;t even get activated for games and can&#8217;t beat a UDFA out as a backup. You figure they&#8217;d trade some of their 30 draft picks to move up and get some real talent.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bozosforall</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/11/no-progress-between-welker-pats/#comment-1715685</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[bozosforall]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2012 14:07:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=524623#comment-1715685</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[toolkien says: 
Apr 12, 2012 9:33 AM 
If Belichick hadn&#039;t cheated by filming defensive signals, he’d have no rings and losing record.
__
Fixed it for you.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>toolkien says:<br />
Apr 12, 2012 9:33 AM<br />
If Belichick hadn&#8217;t cheated by filming defensive signals, he’d have no rings and losing record.<br />
__<br />
Fixed it for you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: toolkien</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/11/no-progress-between-welker-pats/#comment-1715622</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[toolkien]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2012 13:33:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=524623#comment-1715622</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Running the football operations of an NFL franchise is capital budgeting. 95% of the worth of the franchise is in the personal service contracts which a team invests in, just like a manufacturer invests in machinery. As such, there&#039;s ROI over a span of time to consider when deciding basic philosophy and how to turn that into purchasing &quot;capital assets&quot;.

So I can only imagine that a great GM has every player gridded out, with all the constraints in place(global salary cap/floors, collectively bargained player minimums), what their worth is, interconnectivity with other players, etc etc etc. And this is out over 3-4 years. So it becomes a concrete, fiscally bounded block. And the decisions pretty much decide themselves once all the characteristics are fed into The Matrix and a specific scenario is pinged against it. 

So signing up a Welker, or a Forte, or a Brees, or anybody depends not only this year, but all the years ahead and the ever present constraints of all years. The decision to sign Welker at X amount for three years might be impacted by the salary FLOOR constraint in year 3. Who knows? 

It&#039;s about future worth through the gauntlet of future fiscal reality and 50 constraints. If the most logical max offer is 1 year $9M, then that is what it is. 

Anyway, the arguments that player Y has been a &quot;stud&quot; over the last five years means nothing about how they will play over the next 2-3 years. Sports have pretty much figured out the most valuable period for players is 25-27, the crossover of the most youth coupled with experience. Maybe about 1% buck that reality and have long, HOF caliber careers. So I am sure that being 31 in the 99% plays a big role in the basic assessment of value in Welker&#039;s case. If Belichick was as sentimental as the average fan, he&#039;d have no rings and losing record.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Running the football operations of an NFL franchise is capital budgeting. 95% of the worth of the franchise is in the personal service contracts which a team invests in, just like a manufacturer invests in machinery. As such, there&#8217;s ROI over a span of time to consider when deciding basic philosophy and how to turn that into purchasing &#8220;capital assets&#8221;.</p>
<p>So I can only imagine that a great GM has every player gridded out, with all the constraints in place(global salary cap/floors, collectively bargained player minimums), what their worth is, interconnectivity with other players, etc etc etc. And this is out over 3-4 years. So it becomes a concrete, fiscally bounded block. And the decisions pretty much decide themselves once all the characteristics are fed into The Matrix and a specific scenario is pinged against it. </p>
<p>So signing up a Welker, or a Forte, or a Brees, or anybody depends not only this year, but all the years ahead and the ever present constraints of all years. The decision to sign Welker at X amount for three years might be impacted by the salary FLOOR constraint in year 3. Who knows? </p>
<p>It&#8217;s about future worth through the gauntlet of future fiscal reality and 50 constraints. If the most logical max offer is 1 year $9M, then that is what it is. </p>
<p>Anyway, the arguments that player Y has been a &#8220;stud&#8221; over the last five years means nothing about how they will play over the next 2-3 years. Sports have pretty much figured out the most valuable period for players is 25-27, the crossover of the most youth coupled with experience. Maybe about 1% buck that reality and have long, HOF caliber careers. So I am sure that being 31 in the 99% plays a big role in the basic assessment of value in Welker&#8217;s case. If Belichick was as sentimental as the average fan, he&#8217;d have no rings and losing record.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: karlpilkington</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/11/no-progress-between-welker-pats/#comment-1715524</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[karlpilkington]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2012 12:25:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=524623#comment-1715524</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Welker should walk, the guy can flat out ball.  I dont care if he is 5 foot nothing and turns 31.  The Pats should pay the guy but they wont because they think they can just slide someone else in there and get the same results.  I dont think so.  I guess if your name is not Brady you do not get the long term deal, which is a real shame.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Welker should walk, the guy can flat out ball.  I dont care if he is 5 foot nothing and turns 31.  The Pats should pay the guy but they wont because they think they can just slide someone else in there and get the same results.  I dont think so.  I guess if your name is not Brady you do not get the long term deal, which is a real shame.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tigerlilac</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/11/no-progress-between-welker-pats/#comment-1715503</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[tigerlilac]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2012 12:07:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=524623#comment-1715503</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Patriots have a dogmatic approach to their   designated franchise players.  

1. Welker can elect to sign or not sign his one year salary guarantee.  The Patriots will not use undue influence (monetary or nonmonetary) to force his hand.

2. ThePatriots will not sign Welker prior to him signing the tender (the Asanate Samuel situation led to a much harder line with Logan Mankins) unless he agrees to their number. Nor is their any chance that the Patriots will withdraw their franchise contract tender and allow Welker to immediately revert to an unrestricted free agent.

3. The Patriots signed their insurance policy in Anthony Gonzalez.  Their back-up to the back-up plan is Julian Edelman. Neither player is close to Welker but the Patriots just need these players to get them through the start of the season when the franchised player player has the leverage to sit out.  Welker is unlikley to sit out any games and surely won&#039;t sit out the whole season. Worst case, the Patriots would have Welker back healthy for the stretch run and playoffs.  This strategy only backfires if the Patriots have a rough start and fail to make the playoffs. However, the chance of Welker forgoing half of his 2012 franchise tender (like Mankins) is nil.

In short, this is a non-story.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Patriots have a dogmatic approach to their   designated franchise players.  </p>
<p>1. Welker can elect to sign or not sign his one year salary guarantee.  The Patriots will not use undue influence (monetary or nonmonetary) to force his hand.</p>
<p>2. ThePatriots will not sign Welker prior to him signing the tender (the Asanate Samuel situation led to a much harder line with Logan Mankins) unless he agrees to their number. Nor is their any chance that the Patriots will withdraw their franchise contract tender and allow Welker to immediately revert to an unrestricted free agent.</p>
<p>3. The Patriots signed their insurance policy in Anthony Gonzalez.  Their back-up to the back-up plan is Julian Edelman. Neither player is close to Welker but the Patriots just need these players to get them through the start of the season when the franchised player player has the leverage to sit out.  Welker is unlikley to sit out any games and surely won&#8217;t sit out the whole season. Worst case, the Patriots would have Welker back healthy for the stretch run and playoffs.  This strategy only backfires if the Patriots have a rough start and fail to make the playoffs. However, the chance of Welker forgoing half of his 2012 franchise tender (like Mankins) is nil.</p>
<p>In short, this is a non-story.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sj39</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/11/no-progress-between-welker-pats/#comment-1715499</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[sj39]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2012 12:03:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=524623#comment-1715499</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Good God Wes, take the 9.5 mil for one year and run. You will never make that much again and sure won&#039;t ever get what you&#039;re worth from that cheap@ss team.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good God Wes, take the 9.5 mil for one year and run. You will never make that much again and sure won&#8217;t ever get what you&#8217;re worth from that cheap@ss team.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: indywilson40</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/11/no-progress-between-welker-pats/#comment-1715482</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[indywilson40]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2012 11:34:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=524623#comment-1715482</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Who choked?: Thumbs up for Welker, thumbs down for Brady.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who choked?: Thumbs up for Welker, thumbs down for Brady.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: irishgary</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/11/no-progress-between-welker-pats/#comment-1715468</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[irishgary]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2012 11:14:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=524623#comment-1715468</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Welker knows his team is on the downslide.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Welker knows his team is on the downslide.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dcpatfan</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/11/no-progress-between-welker-pats/#comment-1715457</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[dcpatfan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2012 10:46:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=524623#comment-1715457</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[the dilemma facing the pats is with Welker, not unlike Faulk and Light is you have a guy who completely bought into the program. The Pats now must make the decisions based on the value of that &quot;buying in&quot; as well as production. Personally I want them to pay the man. One of the greatest work ethics in the sport.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the dilemma facing the pats is with Welker, not unlike Faulk and Light is you have a guy who completely bought into the program. The Pats now must make the decisions based on the value of that &#8220;buying in&#8221; as well as production. Personally I want them to pay the man. One of the greatest work ethics in the sport.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sschmiggles</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/11/no-progress-between-welker-pats/#comment-1715456</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[sschmiggles]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2012 10:36:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=524623#comment-1715456</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Welker faces double coverage on the majority of plays and catches more passes than anyone in the league. He&#039;s worth every cent. 

Hard to argue he&#039;s slowing down when he just had the best season of his career. But hey, it&#039;s &quot;just stats&quot; it&#039;s not like he&#039;s a game changing player right?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Welker faces double coverage on the majority of plays and catches more passes than anyone in the league. He&#8217;s worth every cent. </p>
<p>Hard to argue he&#8217;s slowing down when he just had the best season of his career. But hey, it&#8217;s &#8220;just stats&#8221; it&#8217;s not like he&#8217;s a game changing player right?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tikibarbersthesaurus</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/11/no-progress-between-welker-pats/#comment-1715451</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[tikibarbersthesaurus]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2012 10:19:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=524623#comment-1715451</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You catch that ball in the 4th quarter of the Big Game, and Mr. Kraft would be saying, &quot;How much, and how many years? Done.&quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You catch that ball in the 4th quarter of the Big Game, and Mr. Kraft would be saying, &#8220;How much, and how many years? Done.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: realitycheck21</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/11/no-progress-between-welker-pats/#comment-1715436</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[realitycheck21]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2012 09:35:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=524623#comment-1715436</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Neither side wants to cave. Welker&#039;s best hope might in fact be only a 3 year deal. I think he should count himself rather fortunate if he gets a 3 year deal. He&#039;s wicked nuts if he thinks he&#039;s gonna do any better than that. Don&#039;t be a Branch or others who are still on the roster because they&#039;re cheap labor. You&#039;re better than that.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Neither side wants to cave. Welker&#8217;s best hope might in fact be only a 3 year deal. I think he should count himself rather fortunate if he gets a 3 year deal. He&#8217;s wicked nuts if he thinks he&#8217;s gonna do any better than that. Don&#8217;t be a Branch or others who are still on the roster because they&#8217;re cheap labor. You&#8217;re better than that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bleed4philly</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/11/no-progress-between-welker-pats/#comment-1715435</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[bleed4philly]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2012 09:31:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=524623#comment-1715435</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This might not work out, the pats could make him expendable by drafting Kendall wright late in the first round. His 40 time and abilities are very comparable to welker]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This might not work out, the pats could make him expendable by drafting Kendall wright late in the first round. His 40 time and abilities are very comparable to welker</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TheWizard</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/11/no-progress-between-welker-pats/#comment-1715430</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[TheWizard]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2012 08:52:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=524623#comment-1715430</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;i&gt;who turns 31 next month&lt;/i&gt;

And there you have it.

We all love Welker as Pats fans, but Bill isn&#039;t going to tie up big money on him for years into the future.

That&#039;s not part of the formula for keeping the team in contention every year.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>who turns 31 next month</i></p>
<p>And there you have it.</p>
<p>We all love Welker as Pats fans, but Bill isn&#8217;t going to tie up big money on him for years into the future.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s not part of the formula for keeping the team in contention every year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: catquick</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/11/no-progress-between-welker-pats/#comment-1715426</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[catquick]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2012 08:13:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=524623#comment-1715426</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Given the state of affairs in N.O., can the Saints really afford to let Brees flap in the wind?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Given the state of affairs in N.O., can the Saints really afford to let Brees flap in the wind?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: randallflagg52</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/11/no-progress-between-welker-pats/#comment-1715417</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[randallflagg52]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2012 06:34:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=524623#comment-1715417</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[HAHA!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>HAHA!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: darthvader89</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/11/no-progress-between-welker-pats/#comment-1715406</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[darthvader89]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2012 05:39:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=524623#comment-1715406</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[No progress between Brees and Saints, Flacco and Ravens, Welker and Pats or Forte and the Bears, what do you bet they all sign on the first day of NBA playoffs just to piss off the basketball people...hahhaha]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No progress between Brees and Saints, Flacco and Ravens, Welker and Pats or Forte and the Bears, what do you bet they all sign on the first day of NBA playoffs just to piss off the basketball people&#8230;hahhaha</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jc327</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/11/no-progress-between-welker-pats/#comment-1715400</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jc327]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2012 05:16:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=524623#comment-1715400</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Send him back to Miami. Fins shoulda never let him go...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Send him back to Miami. Fins shoulda never let him go&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bigwinintx</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/11/no-progress-between-welker-pats/#comment-1715391</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[bigwinintx]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2012 05:03:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=524623#comment-1715391</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It would be foolish to sign a 31 year old receiver to a long term contract, let alone a guy whose had knee problems and only stands 5&#039; 9&quot;.

Welker is looking for that ride into the sunset contract that most teams don&#039;t give anymore, especially teams that have a dynamic duo at tight end.

Good luck Wes, but I wouldn&#039;t hold my breath.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It would be foolish to sign a 31 year old receiver to a long term contract, let alone a guy whose had knee problems and only stands 5&#8242; 9&#8243;.</p>
<p>Welker is looking for that ride into the sunset contract that most teams don&#8217;t give anymore, especially teams that have a dynamic duo at tight end.</p>
<p>Good luck Wes, but I wouldn&#8217;t hold my breath.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zerophocus</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/11/no-progress-between-welker-pats/#comment-1715387</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[zerophocus]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2012 04:58:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=524623#comment-1715387</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Why is franchised players not getting deals a news story? The draft is a couple weeks away, that should be every teams priority. The franchised players can&#039;t go anywhere else so there is no rush to get to them before the draft. 

If their deals were that easy to finish they would have been signed before they were franchised.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why is franchised players not getting deals a news story? The draft is a couple weeks away, that should be every teams priority. The franchised players can&#8217;t go anywhere else so there is no rush to get to them before the draft. </p>
<p>If their deals were that easy to finish they would have been signed before they were franchised.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DailySpew</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/11/no-progress-between-welker-pats/#comment-1715379</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[DailySpew]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2012 04:44:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=524623#comment-1715379</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I like Welker, but this is not the appropriate image of him to use in a story about his unwillingness to sign a $9.5 million deal. Life is way harder than this.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like Welker, but this is not the appropriate image of him to use in a story about his unwillingness to sign a $9.5 million deal. Life is way harder than this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lightofkolob</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/11/no-progress-between-welker-pats/#comment-1715374</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[lightofkolob]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2012 04:29:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=524623#comment-1715374</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well if they refused to take care of Randy Moss....]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well if they refused to take care of Randy Moss&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nbroski</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/11/no-progress-between-welker-pats/#comment-1715371</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[nbroski]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2012 04:27:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=524623#comment-1715371</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Pats really should not let Welker slip through their hands...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Pats really should not let Welker slip through their hands&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eastsideballa</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/11/no-progress-between-welker-pats/#comment-1715369</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[eastsideballa]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2012 04:23:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=524623#comment-1715369</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Spygate.....that is all.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Spygate&#8230;..that is all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
