Comments on: Report: “Little chance” Eagles would trade up to No. 4 http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/14/report-little-chance-eagles-would-trade-up-to-no-4/ ProFootballTalk on NBCSports.com Thu, 23 May 2013 11:27:44 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.com/ By: oldbyrd http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/14/report-little-chance-eagles-would-trade-up-to-no-4/#comment-1722378 Mon, 16 Apr 2012 12:22:15 +0000 http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=549018#comment-1722378 Not I player worth drafting up for @ 4 I ll bet they trade down

]]> By: mungman69 http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/14/report-little-chance-eagles-would-trade-up-to-no-4/#comment-1721272 Sun, 15 Apr 2012 15:43:05 +0000 http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=549018#comment-1721272 I don’t think that the Eagles will trade up, that’s not Reid’s style. I can see the Eagles trading down, in fact I’m sure that the Eagles will trade down.

]]> By: dlightner13 http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/14/report-little-chance-eagles-would-trade-up-to-no-4/#comment-1721125 Sun, 15 Apr 2012 13:14:36 +0000 http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=549018#comment-1721125 The eagles need to draft LB or S. Everyone say Kuechly but the have Ryans now.. Kuechly is a sideline to sideline MLB. I don’t know if he can transition well to outside, havent seen much on his covering ability. I do like Jamar Chaney who will move back outside where he belongs with Ryans there. I’d like to see the Eagles go with Mark Barron at 15, may need to move in front of the Cowboys pending on how the draft goes ahead of them for Barron. But who am I kidding we are talking about Fatty Ried he is going DT regardless what we think.

]]> By: penz84 http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/14/report-little-chance-eagles-would-trade-up-to-no-4/#comment-1721114 Sun, 15 Apr 2012 13:00:15 +0000 http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=549018#comment-1721114 I can’t see any reason or need for the eagles to move up in the draft,especially to No4 ? If anything,knowing them,they’ll trade down a few places while at the same time screwing some poor unsuspecting team. I’m just glad my Skins are at No2,out of harms way.

]]> By: jabru90 http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/14/report-little-chance-eagles-would-trade-up-to-no-4/#comment-1721052 Sun, 15 Apr 2012 08:50:13 +0000 http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=549018#comment-1721052 Think about it like this: The Eagles need at least one playmaker in every position group within the defense: Tackle(Jenkins), End(Cole), MLB(Ryans), CB(Asomugha):

Not withstanding depth in all areas always; but, regardless of what has been wasted in previous draft picks, the Eagles need a safety who is respected, feared and stays on the field on 3rd down. The Eagles have no “standouts”in that group. Ditto for an OLB; someone fast and mean, who can move sideline to sideline, stay on the field on 3rd down and cover a TE. They need to limit personel changes and get away from “specialists”.

]]> By: randomcommenter http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/14/report-little-chance-eagles-would-trade-up-to-no-4/#comment-1720996 Sun, 15 Apr 2012 05:45:40 +0000 http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=549018#comment-1720996 The eagles need to stay where they are so they can draft an underperforming lineman. It’s their way.

]]> By: eaglesnoles05 http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/14/report-little-chance-eagles-would-trade-up-to-no-4/#comment-1720987 Sun, 15 Apr 2012 05:22:28 +0000 http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=549018#comment-1720987 Though I’d sure love agc99′s proposed move a couple comments above!

]]> By: eaglesnoles05 http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/14/report-little-chance-eagles-would-trade-up-to-no-4/#comment-1720986 Sun, 15 Apr 2012 05:21:42 +0000 http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=549018#comment-1720986 They’re gonna trade BACK, if you ask me.

]]> By: cmdrsmooth http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/14/report-little-chance-eagles-would-trade-up-to-no-4/#comment-1720917 Sun, 15 Apr 2012 03:16:02 +0000 http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=549018#comment-1720917 They need an impact linebacker.

]]> By: agc99 http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/14/report-little-chance-eagles-would-trade-up-to-no-4/#comment-1720843 Sun, 15 Apr 2012 01:58:10 +0000 http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=549018#comment-1720843 Eagles will give the browns Kafka for the 4th overall pick in the draft. That’s the way Philly trades. Teams fall for it all the time.

]]> By: abninf http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/14/report-little-chance-eagles-would-trade-up-to-no-4/#comment-1720788 Sun, 15 Apr 2012 01:19:47 +0000 http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=549018#comment-1720788 Reid doesn’t need to trade up. He already has the Dream Team.

]]> By: nygdriveforfive http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/14/report-little-chance-eagles-would-trade-up-to-no-4/#comment-1720735 Sun, 15 Apr 2012 00:21:27 +0000 http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=549018#comment-1720735 The only way the eagles trade up is if Kalil drops past 4th then they could make a run at him. I respect Andy Ried to much to think he is dumb enough to trade up for Tannehill when Kafka is on the roster.

]]> By: elmaxoh http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/14/report-little-chance-eagles-would-trade-up-to-no-4/#comment-1720730 Sun, 15 Apr 2012 00:15:25 +0000 http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=549018#comment-1720730 The only player that worth the trade up is Blackmon.

]]> By: EaglesFly58High http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/14/report-little-chance-eagles-would-trade-up-to-no-4/#comment-1720702 Sat, 14 Apr 2012 23:41:53 +0000 http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=549018#comment-1720702 We can cut vick next year without a cap hit. I don’t want that or tannehill. If the trade up is for anyone but him I’ll be happy

]]> By: scrap7681 http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/14/report-little-chance-eagles-would-trade-up-to-no-4/#comment-1720682 Sat, 14 Apr 2012 23:23:43 +0000 http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=549018#comment-1720682 I hear that Andy is gonna pimp out jenniferxxx for some extra cap $, and of course it should keep her mouth busy so she can’t make these idiotic redundant posts!

]]> By: ytownie http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/14/report-little-chance-eagles-would-trade-up-to-no-4/#comment-1720671 Sat, 14 Apr 2012 23:17:51 +0000 http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=549018#comment-1720671 Andy Reid is always looking for a better QB. If he believes that Tannehill is a franchise QB, you bet he would move up to four switch for 15 and throw in both 2nd rounders. Gives him the luxury of a few years to groom his QB of the future. If this happens it will be on the clock because they would fear some other team jumping up to 3 if they really wanted Tannehill. This rumor was first reported by Tony Grossi , formally beat writer of the Plain Dealer and now a writer for ESPN Cleveland.

]]> By: nomoreseasontix http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/14/report-little-chance-eagles-would-trade-up-to-no-4/#comment-1720642 Sat, 14 Apr 2012 22:54:10 +0000 http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=549018#comment-1720642 Why would they move up? They still owe Vick about a bazillion dollars over the next 15 or so years in that brilliant

]]> By: bchapman2011 http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/14/report-little-chance-eagles-would-trade-up-to-no-4/#comment-1720641 Sat, 14 Apr 2012 22:53:10 +0000 http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=549018#comment-1720641 I kind of feel bad for Ryan Tannehill. Every year there are one or two players that are used as pawns by NFL GM’s during the draft process and this year it is Tannehill. I know everybody will think that I am crazy but I could see this guy sliding to the middle or end of round 1. All of these teams that are supposedly intereted in him are just trying to get Miami and several others to bite and trade up. I might be wrong but I think this guy slides past Miami at number 8.

]]> By: CJ http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/14/report-little-chance-eagles-would-trade-up-to-no-4/#comment-1720635 Sat, 14 Apr 2012 22:48:25 +0000 http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=549018#comment-1720635 I haven’t seen anyone bring this up yet, but it wouldn’t suprise me if the report is true and that the Eagles called the Browns about #4 between the Peters injury and the Bell signing with the hope of getting Kalil.

]]> By: slowclyde86 http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/14/report-little-chance-eagles-would-trade-up-to-no-4/#comment-1720610 Sat, 14 Apr 2012 22:32:04 +0000 http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=549018#comment-1720610 If Khalil somehow slides to four, this trade becomes more likely. Otherwise, not so much.

]]> By: phillyrick22 http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/14/report-little-chance-eagles-would-trade-up-to-no-4/#comment-1720584 Sat, 14 Apr 2012 22:16:44 +0000 http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=549018#comment-1720584 @ nfl fan: kick rocks!

]]> By: phillyrick22 http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/14/report-little-chance-eagles-would-trade-up-to-no-4/#comment-1720581 Sat, 14 Apr 2012 22:16:15 +0000 http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=549018#comment-1720581 No chance! Why waste picks for Tenenhill, way too many intangibles to make that risky pick. This team needs to stop BSing and pick Kueckly! This kid is the real deal!

]]> By: jrc323 http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/14/report-little-chance-eagles-would-trade-up-to-no-4/#comment-1720580 Sat, 14 Apr 2012 22:15:52 +0000 http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=549018#comment-1720580 Kick in the door wavin’ the 44…

]]> By: chawk12thman http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/14/report-little-chance-eagles-would-trade-up-to-no-4/#comment-1720573 Sat, 14 Apr 2012 22:08:20 +0000 http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=549018#comment-1720573 If the Browns are having trouble dealing with the pressure of #4, the Seahawks would be willing to trade up from #12. However, since they are doing it just to help Holmgren out for old time sake, they wouldn’t throw in any other picks or $.

]]> By: nfl fan http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/14/report-little-chance-eagles-would-trade-up-to-no-4/#comment-1720563 Sat, 14 Apr 2012 21:59:09 +0000 http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=549018#comment-1720563 Little chance they’ll win a Super Bowl either…

]]> By: laeaglefan http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/14/report-little-chance-eagles-would-trade-up-to-no-4/#comment-1720558 Sat, 14 Apr 2012 21:56:01 +0000 http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=549018#comment-1720558 If everyone is denying it, then it probably WILL happen!

]]> By: dawglb http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/14/report-little-chance-eagles-would-trade-up-to-no-4/#comment-1720557 Sat, 14 Apr 2012 21:55:38 +0000 http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=549018#comment-1720557 I am tired of Cleveland being the Eagles JV team. Stop dealing with the Eagles! The Eagles have proven to know when to get rid of players (except Dawkins & Akers… Neither landed in Cleveland).

]]> By: sleepers108 http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/14/report-little-chance-eagles-would-trade-up-to-no-4/#comment-1720555 Sat, 14 Apr 2012 21:55:34 +0000 http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=549018#comment-1720555 They are going to take a Linebacker or a defensive lineman!

]]> By: RussianBreadMaker http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/14/report-little-chance-eagles-would-trade-up-to-no-4/#comment-1720456 Sat, 14 Apr 2012 20:46:33 +0000 http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=549018#comment-1720456 Who would they take? A Tackle?

]]> By: jdandcoke http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/14/report-little-chance-eagles-would-trade-up-to-no-4/#comment-1720451 Sat, 14 Apr 2012 20:43:22 +0000 http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=549018#comment-1720451 the eagles could trade up to number 1 and theyd still manage to screw it up.

]]>