<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 32 takes on the 2012 schedule</title>
	<atom:link href="http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/18/32-takes-on-the-2012-schedule/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/18/32-takes-on-the-2012-schedule/</link>
	<description>ProFootballTalk on NBCSports.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 16:30:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: blackqbwhiterb</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/18/32-takes-on-the-2012-schedule/#comment-1738889</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[blackqbwhiterb]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2012 10:46:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=560061#comment-1738889</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Redskins win the NFC East, surprising many, but not me. HTTR!!!!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Redskins win the NFC East, surprising many, but not me. HTTR!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sliceanddic3</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/18/32-takes-on-the-2012-schedule/#comment-1731556</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[sliceanddic3]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2012 02:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=560061#comment-1731556</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So I mixed up the years…..Please learn to spell i-d-i-o-t, you looser (haha). Fact is the Ravens complained about playing primetime in Pitt and then were awarded with 2 straight years of playing primetime in Baltimore where they beat Dennis Dixon in OT and then lost the next year. My point still remains, who cares where they play? And no, I only remember how the Ravens cannot beat the Steelers in the playoffs and choked real well against the Patriots. Way to go hon.
-
Ha. Okay i deserve that one. And the whole Ravens team did not choke, only Evans and Cundiff choked. Flacco out played Brady. Theres no words how they stunk it up against Pit in the playoffs.. But man, its just a matter of time until they beat the Steelers in the playoffs whether it be in Baltimore or Pittsburgh.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So I mixed up the years…..Please learn to spell i-d-i-o-t, you looser (haha). Fact is the Ravens complained about playing primetime in Pitt and then were awarded with 2 straight years of playing primetime in Baltimore where they beat Dennis Dixon in OT and then lost the next year. My point still remains, who cares where they play? And no, I only remember how the Ravens cannot beat the Steelers in the playoffs and choked real well against the Patriots. Way to go hon.<br />
-<br />
Ha. Okay i deserve that one. And the whole Ravens team did not choke, only Evans and Cundiff choked. Flacco out played Brady. Theres no words how they stunk it up against Pit in the playoffs.. But man, its just a matter of time until they beat the Steelers in the playoffs whether it be in Baltimore or Pittsburgh.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: steelerfannomatterwhat</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/18/32-takes-on-the-2012-schedule/#comment-1728906</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[steelerfannomatterwhat]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2012 00:35:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=560061#comment-1728906</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Idoit. The Ravens played in Pittsburgh last year on a Sunday night (Primetime). And beat them. Remember, when Flacco went 92 yards on your defense and threw the game winner to Torrey Smith?
-
So I mixed up the years.....Please learn to spell i-d-i-o-t, you looser (haha). Fact is the Ravens complained about playing primetime in Pitt and then were awarded with 2 straight years of playing primetime in Baltimore where they beat Dennis Dixon in OT and then lost the next year. My point still remains, who cares where they play? And no, I only remember how the Ravens cannot beat the Steelers in the playoffs and choked real well against the Patriots. Way to go hon.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Idoit. The Ravens played in Pittsburgh last year on a Sunday night (Primetime). And beat them. Remember, when Flacco went 92 yards on your defense and threw the game winner to Torrey Smith?<br />
-<br />
So I mixed up the years&#8230;..Please learn to spell i-d-i-o-t, you looser (haha). Fact is the Ravens complained about playing primetime in Pitt and then were awarded with 2 straight years of playing primetime in Baltimore where they beat Dennis Dixon in OT and then lost the next year. My point still remains, who cares where they play? And no, I only remember how the Ravens cannot beat the Steelers in the playoffs and choked real well against the Patriots. Way to go hon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stavreafavre</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/18/32-takes-on-the-2012-schedule/#comment-1728128</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[stavreafavre]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2012 20:02:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=560061#comment-1728128</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[October in Wisconsin is perfect, ideal football weather. And year after year, the packers get one or maybe two games at home in that month. Stupid.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>October in Wisconsin is perfect, ideal football weather. And year after year, the packers get one or maybe two games at home in that month. Stupid.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rg32dc</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/18/32-takes-on-the-2012-schedule/#comment-1728124</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[rg32dc]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2012 20:00:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=560061#comment-1728124</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;along with the one Thursday game in which every team will participate&quot;

Wow.  That should be a real scrum.  I believe I might tune in for that one.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;along with the one Thursday game in which every team will participate&#8221;</p>
<p>Wow.  That should be a real scrum.  I believe I might tune in for that one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: watermelon1</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/18/32-takes-on-the-2012-schedule/#comment-1727964</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[watermelon1]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2012 18:38:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=560061#comment-1727964</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The ravens simply asked if they could finally HOST the annual prime time matchup against the steelers after always havin to play in Pittsburgh for the nationally televised game. 

Please don&#039;t make it sound like they wanted or expected or even asked to never play in Pittsburgh at night ever again. 

But seriously... 2 meetings between these teams in 14 days?  Only thing that could make that better is if Hines ward ends
Up coming back in time for those once steelers realize they need more receivers and leadership on offense.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The ravens simply asked if they could finally HOST the annual prime time matchup against the steelers after always havin to play in Pittsburgh for the nationally televised game. </p>
<p>Please don&#8217;t make it sound like they wanted or expected or even asked to never play in Pittsburgh at night ever again. </p>
<p>But seriously&#8230; 2 meetings between these teams in 14 days?  Only thing that could make that better is if Hines ward ends<br />
Up coming back in time for those once steelers realize they need more receivers and leadership on offense.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sliceanddic3</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/18/32-takes-on-the-2012-schedule/#comment-1727946</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[sliceanddic3]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2012 18:26:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=560061#comment-1727946</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[steelerfannomatterwhat says:Apr 18, 2012 12:30 PM 

Ravens people…..please get it right. The Ravens played primetime regular season games in Pittsburgh 2 years in a row and lost and then lost the primetime playoff game which is a playoff game. The Baltimore Sun reported that the Ravens requested that the NFL not make the Ravens play ANY primetime games in Pittsburgh anymore. Therefore, the next year, the Steelers played in Baltimore in primetime and beat the Ravens. Last year, there were no Steelers-Ravens primetime games period and the Ravens won both. This year, they are going back to a game in Pittsburgh. If the schedule was reversed, I would not see it as an advantage. It is what it is. The Steelers beat the Ravens at home in primetime, the Steelers beat the Ravens at Baltimore in primetimw, the Ravens beat the Steelers in Baltimore and Pittsburgh in daytime…….who cares? Get over it, hon.
------------------------------------------------
Idoit. The Ravens played in Pittsburgh last year on a Sunday night (Primetime). And beat them. Remember, when Flacco went 92 yards on your defense and threw the game winner to Torrey Smith?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>steelerfannomatterwhat says:Apr 18, 2012 12:30 PM </p>
<p>Ravens people…..please get it right. The Ravens played primetime regular season games in Pittsburgh 2 years in a row and lost and then lost the primetime playoff game which is a playoff game. The Baltimore Sun reported that the Ravens requested that the NFL not make the Ravens play ANY primetime games in Pittsburgh anymore. Therefore, the next year, the Steelers played in Baltimore in primetime and beat the Ravens. Last year, there were no Steelers-Ravens primetime games period and the Ravens won both. This year, they are going back to a game in Pittsburgh. If the schedule was reversed, I would not see it as an advantage. It is what it is. The Steelers beat the Ravens at home in primetime, the Steelers beat the Ravens at Baltimore in primetimw, the Ravens beat the Steelers in Baltimore and Pittsburgh in daytime…….who cares? Get over it, hon.<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;<br />
Idoit. The Ravens played in Pittsburgh last year on a Sunday night (Primetime). And beat them. Remember, when Flacco went 92 yards on your defense and threw the game winner to Torrey Smith?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: steelers1981</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/18/32-takes-on-the-2012-schedule/#comment-1727844</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[steelers1981]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2012 17:28:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=560061#comment-1727844</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[sportssince85 says: 
Apr 18, 2012 2:27 AM 
U also forgot to mention dat the Cowboys first 11 weeks of the season consist of 8 road games..thats a hard way to begin begin the season
_____________________________________

Wrong!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>sportssince85 says:<br />
Apr 18, 2012 2:27 AM<br />
U also forgot to mention dat the Cowboys first 11 weeks of the season consist of 8 road games..thats a hard way to begin begin the season<br />
_____________________________________</p>
<p>Wrong!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: steelers1981</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/18/32-takes-on-the-2012-schedule/#comment-1727829</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[steelers1981]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2012 17:23:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=560061#comment-1727829</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[starfan79 says: 
Apr 18, 2012 7:48 AM 
Cowboys have 8 road games in the first 11 weeks.. Damn!
____________________________________
 
No, they don&#039;t!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>starfan79 says:<br />
Apr 18, 2012 7:48 AM<br />
Cowboys have 8 road games in the first 11 weeks.. Damn!<br />
____________________________________</p>
<p>No, they don&#8217;t!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bowden5000</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/18/32-takes-on-the-2012-schedule/#comment-1727790</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[bowden5000]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2012 17:05:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=560061#comment-1727790</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Bills success in 2011??? 6-10 and last place.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bills success in 2011??? 6-10 and last place.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: steelers1981</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/18/32-takes-on-the-2012-schedule/#comment-1727753</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[steelers1981]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2012 16:46:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=560061#comment-1727753</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As some others have pointed out, the NFL works on a rotating schedule.  In theory you can tell who your favorite teams play in 14 of the 16 games years into the future and you can get an idea of who the other two games will be against.  Those two games will be against teams in the same conference as the team in question but not in the same divison as the team in question.  They are teams that finished in the same place (1st place or 2nd place, etc,) as the team in question.  The only thing not known in advance is what point in the season they play different teams and what day of the week they&#039;ll play.  There is very little room for favoritism in NFL scheduling]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As some others have pointed out, the NFL works on a rotating schedule.  In theory you can tell who your favorite teams play in 14 of the 16 games years into the future and you can get an idea of who the other two games will be against.  Those two games will be against teams in the same conference as the team in question but not in the same divison as the team in question.  They are teams that finished in the same place (1st place or 2nd place, etc,) as the team in question.  The only thing not known in advance is what point in the season they play different teams and what day of the week they&#8217;ll play.  There is very little room for favoritism in NFL scheduling</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: steelerfannomatterwhat</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/18/32-takes-on-the-2012-schedule/#comment-1727731</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[steelerfannomatterwhat]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2012 16:35:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=560061#comment-1727731</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There is no such thing as being &quot;given an easy schedule&quot;. The NFL rotates the schedules every year and the inter-divisional games and inter-conference games are rotated every cycle for home/visitors. If you win your division, you play the 1st place team in 2 other divisions in your conference and that is it. The remaining games are determined by rotation.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is no such thing as being &#8220;given an easy schedule&#8221;. The NFL rotates the schedules every year and the inter-divisional games and inter-conference games are rotated every cycle for home/visitors. If you win your division, you play the 1st place team in 2 other divisions in your conference and that is it. The remaining games are determined by rotation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: steelerfannomatterwhat</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/18/32-takes-on-the-2012-schedule/#comment-1727722</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[steelerfannomatterwhat]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2012 16:30:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=560061#comment-1727722</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ravens people.....please get it right. The Ravens played primetime regular season games in Pittsburgh 2 years in a row and lost and then lost the primetime playoff game which is a playoff game. The Baltimore Sun reported that the Ravens requested that the NFL not make the Ravens play ANY primetime games in Pittsburgh anymore. Therefore, the next year, the Steelers played in Baltimore in primetime and beat the Ravens. Last year, there were no Steelers-Ravens primetime games period and the Ravens won both. This year, they are going back to a game in Pittsburgh. If the schedule was reversed, I would not see it as an advantage. It is what it is. The Steelers beat the Ravens at home in primetime, the Steelers beat the Ravens at Baltimore in primetimw, the Ravens beat the Steelers in Baltimore and Pittsburgh in daytime.......who cares? Get over it, hon.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ravens people&#8230;..please get it right. The Ravens played primetime regular season games in Pittsburgh 2 years in a row and lost and then lost the primetime playoff game which is a playoff game. The Baltimore Sun reported that the Ravens requested that the NFL not make the Ravens play ANY primetime games in Pittsburgh anymore. Therefore, the next year, the Steelers played in Baltimore in primetime and beat the Ravens. Last year, there were no Steelers-Ravens primetime games period and the Ravens won both. This year, they are going back to a game in Pittsburgh. If the schedule was reversed, I would not see it as an advantage. It is what it is. The Steelers beat the Ravens at home in primetime, the Steelers beat the Ravens at Baltimore in primetimw, the Ravens beat the Steelers in Baltimore and Pittsburgh in daytime&#8230;&#8230;.who cares? Get over it, hon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: noquickreactionshere</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/18/32-takes-on-the-2012-schedule/#comment-1727632</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[noquickreactionshere]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2012 15:54:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=560061#comment-1727632</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[getyourownname says: 
Apr 18, 2012 9:03 AM 
manofsteel3 says:
Apr 18, 2012 8:11 AM
“And while the Ravens previously have asked to not play in Pittsburgh at night…”
This still blows my mind, that the freakin Ravens asked not to play in Pittsburgh at night. You’ve got to be kidding me. I cannot recall any other team doing something like this. Request a home game before a Thursday nighter, sure. Request not to have 3 straight on the road. Fine. But asking not to play a division opponent on the road at night. Just embarassing.
**************************
As usual, like the crowd scene in Frankenstein, Florio loves to stoke the uninformed. Makes for a lot more hits on the website.

The facts are that in 2009, after the Ravens had played 3 of the previous 4 years in Pburgh at night prime time games – which everyone knows is an advantage – they requested not to to it yet again after Pburgh had won the Super Bowl and was expected to be awarded a home night opener. At that time, the Steelers never had to play a night game in Bmore. That request was made one time, 3 years ago, and has not been repeated.

I respect the Steelers but you can’t tell me if the situation was reversed, Steeler fans wouldn’t be annoyed about advantage going to the Ravens.

_______________________________

Thank you for putting up a comment that actually makes sense.  Can&#039;t stand these posts that just try to make a non-story into a stort.  I&#039;m a die hard Ravens fan, I read the Sun and Baltimoreravens.com every day and listen to sports talk on my ride in to work and home every day.  Not once have I heard anything about the Ravens requesting not to play at night in Pitt.  Only story is the Ravens requesting a Monday Night home game.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>getyourownname says:<br />
Apr 18, 2012 9:03 AM<br />
manofsteel3 says:<br />
Apr 18, 2012 8:11 AM<br />
“And while the Ravens previously have asked to not play in Pittsburgh at night…”<br />
This still blows my mind, that the freakin Ravens asked not to play in Pittsburgh at night. You’ve got to be kidding me. I cannot recall any other team doing something like this. Request a home game before a Thursday nighter, sure. Request not to have 3 straight on the road. Fine. But asking not to play a division opponent on the road at night. Just embarassing.<br />
**************************<br />
As usual, like the crowd scene in Frankenstein, Florio loves to stoke the uninformed. Makes for a lot more hits on the website.</p>
<p>The facts are that in 2009, after the Ravens had played 3 of the previous 4 years in Pburgh at night prime time games – which everyone knows is an advantage – they requested not to to it yet again after Pburgh had won the Super Bowl and was expected to be awarded a home night opener. At that time, the Steelers never had to play a night game in Bmore. That request was made one time, 3 years ago, and has not been repeated.</p>
<p>I respect the Steelers but you can’t tell me if the situation was reversed, Steeler fans wouldn’t be annoyed about advantage going to the Ravens.</p>
<p>_______________________________</p>
<p>Thank you for putting up a comment that actually makes sense.  Can&#8217;t stand these posts that just try to make a non-story into a stort.  I&#8217;m a die hard Ravens fan, I read the Sun and Baltimoreravens.com every day and listen to sports talk on my ride in to work and home every day.  Not once have I heard anything about the Ravens requesting not to play at night in Pitt.  Only story is the Ravens requesting a Monday Night home game.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jjackwagon</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/18/32-takes-on-the-2012-schedule/#comment-1727525</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jjackwagon]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2012 15:13:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=560061#comment-1727525</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[MF, still perpetuating the myth that the AFC West is some how a lesser division than the others. Bravo, MF&#039;r Bravo. 
BTW as previously mentioned the AFC West had a higher winning percentage than the NFC East NFC West and AFC South, just in case you are really interested in the truth. So please tell us exactly what you meant by &quot;depleted&quot;.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MF, still perpetuating the myth that the AFC West is some how a lesser division than the others. Bravo, MF&#8217;r Bravo.<br />
BTW as previously mentioned the AFC West had a higher winning percentage than the NFC East NFC West and AFC South, just in case you are really interested in the truth. So please tell us exactly what you meant by &#8220;depleted&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: theandy59</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/18/32-takes-on-the-2012-schedule/#comment-1727498</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[theandy59]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2012 15:05:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=560061#comment-1727498</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#039;s definitely too early to predict because you don&#039;t know who&#039;s good and who sucks yet; but based on what we know from last season, this does look like an easy schedule for New England.  Of their three toughest games, two are at Gillette.  The rest of the league better hope that the Bills, Jets, and Dolphins get a lot better real fast or you could be looking at another 14-2 season and #1 seed for New England.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s definitely too early to predict because you don&#8217;t know who&#8217;s good and who sucks yet; but based on what we know from last season, this does look like an easy schedule for New England.  Of their three toughest games, two are at Gillette.  The rest of the league better hope that the Bills, Jets, and Dolphins get a lot better real fast or you could be looking at another 14-2 season and #1 seed for New England.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ptownstripes</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/18/32-takes-on-the-2012-schedule/#comment-1727456</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ptownstripes]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2012 14:52:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=560061#comment-1727456</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Bills:  Their success in 2011 hasn’t translated to greater exposure in 2012.
_________________________________
Success?


xxsweepthelegxx says:Apr 18, 2012 9:03 AM 

I love how people get worked up over the schedule like hte NFL plays “favorites.” It’s based on a formula used, plus two flex games. The formula has remained the same for years, you can pretty much figure out what conference/non confernece teams YOUR team will play in 2014, 2015, etc… It’s simple math. 

And no game is easy at schedule release time. If my team had the 49ers on the schedule last year, early on, I’d be calling that an “easy game.” Then they finish 13-3. Once you get into the season a little, THEN you can mark down some “Easy” games.
__________________________________
Thank you for this. I am sick of reading people&#039;s questions as to how the Patriots can go to the Super Bowl and then have an &quot;easy&quot; schedule. It is called schedule rotation. And I&#039;m a Bengals fan, not a Patriots fan before anyone jumps to the wrong conclusion.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bills:  Their success in 2011 hasn’t translated to greater exposure in 2012.<br />
_________________________________<br />
Success?</p>
<p>xxsweepthelegxx says:Apr 18, 2012 9:03 AM </p>
<p>I love how people get worked up over the schedule like hte NFL plays “favorites.” It’s based on a formula used, plus two flex games. The formula has remained the same for years, you can pretty much figure out what conference/non confernece teams YOUR team will play in 2014, 2015, etc… It’s simple math. </p>
<p>And no game is easy at schedule release time. If my team had the 49ers on the schedule last year, early on, I’d be calling that an “easy game.” Then they finish 13-3. Once you get into the season a little, THEN you can mark down some “Easy” games.<br />
__________________________________<br />
Thank you for this. I am sick of reading people&#8217;s questions as to how the Patriots can go to the Super Bowl and then have an &#8220;easy&#8221; schedule. It is called schedule rotation. And I&#8217;m a Bengals fan, not a Patriots fan before anyone jumps to the wrong conclusion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hooahitsnotatomthing</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/18/32-takes-on-the-2012-schedule/#comment-1727407</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[hooahitsnotatomthing]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2012 14:38:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=560061#comment-1727407</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[sj39 says: 
Apr 18, 2012 8:21 AM 
Best schedule the Rams have had in quite a while. I think they will have a much better record than 4 and 4 at the bye

-----------------------------------------------

This is laughable. Jim Schwartz has been working on his hand shake all season and with as brittle as Sam Bradford is, that&#039;s not a good thing!

After game one it will be on with Kellen Clemmens.

Give it up Lambs fans. You&#039;re a baseball town at best.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>sj39 says:<br />
Apr 18, 2012 8:21 AM<br />
Best schedule the Rams have had in quite a while. I think they will have a much better record than 4 and 4 at the bye</p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;</p>
<p>This is laughable. Jim Schwartz has been working on his hand shake all season and with as brittle as Sam Bradford is, that&#8217;s not a good thing!</p>
<p>After game one it will be on with Kellen Clemmens.</p>
<p>Give it up Lambs fans. You&#8217;re a baseball town at best.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cacaw420</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/18/32-takes-on-the-2012-schedule/#comment-1727311</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[cacaw420]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2012 14:03:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=560061#comment-1727311</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[kinnex says: Apr 18, 2012 3:12 AM

Why did the Ravens ask to not play in Pittsburgh at night?
---------------------------

because at that point (before the 2009 season) the Steelers had hosted the Ravens in primetime in three of the previous four years, with the Ravens getting no home primetime games against the Steelers in that span.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>kinnex says: Apr 18, 2012 3:12 AM</p>
<p>Why did the Ravens ask to not play in Pittsburgh at night?<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;</p>
<p>because at that point (before the 2009 season) the Steelers had hosted the Ravens in primetime in three of the previous four years, with the Ravens getting no home primetime games against the Steelers in that span.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: toolkien</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/18/32-takes-on-the-2012-schedule/#comment-1727271</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[toolkien]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2012 13:48:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=560061#comment-1727271</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[buddybowl-

It&#039;s &quot;favoritism&quot; to have the two #1 seeds from the prior year showcased when the league is paid for by advertising? Who are they supposed to showcase at 7:00 P.M. the Browns and Dolphins? BILLIONS have to be generated by the networks to pay for all this and if the eyes aren&#039;t affixed to the commercials, the money don&#039;t flow.  The same goes for Manning - people are going to want to watch him rebound or fail, either way the advertisers are happy and the money flows. This isn&#039;t t-ball where everyone gets a ribbon and a popsicle for participating.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>buddybowl-</p>
<p>It&#8217;s &#8220;favoritism&#8221; to have the two #1 seeds from the prior year showcased when the league is paid for by advertising? Who are they supposed to showcase at 7:00 P.M. the Browns and Dolphins? BILLIONS have to be generated by the networks to pay for all this and if the eyes aren&#8217;t affixed to the commercials, the money don&#8217;t flow.  The same goes for Manning &#8211; people are going to want to watch him rebound or fail, either way the advertisers are happy and the money flows. This isn&#8217;t t-ball where everyone gets a ribbon and a popsicle for participating.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bosfaninva</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/18/32-takes-on-the-2012-schedule/#comment-1727215</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[bosfaninva]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2012 13:19:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=560061#comment-1727215</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As a Pats fan for over 40 years, during most of which the Pats were the laughingstock/doormat/whipping boy/joke of the NFL, it tickles me no end to see the hatred/jealousy on these boards.

Let&#039;s pencil the Pats in for another 13-3 season, shall we? LOL]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a Pats fan for over 40 years, during most of which the Pats were the laughingstock/doormat/whipping boy/joke of the NFL, it tickles me no end to see the hatred/jealousy on these boards.</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s pencil the Pats in for another 13-3 season, shall we? LOL</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cornedbeefhashinacan</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/18/32-takes-on-the-2012-schedule/#comment-1727214</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[cornedbeefhashinacan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2012 13:18:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=560061#comment-1727214</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Guess who&#039;s watching all three Bears MNF games? This guy]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Guess who&#8217;s watching all three Bears MNF games? This guy</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pawesl</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/18/32-takes-on-the-2012-schedule/#comment-1727206</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[pawesl]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2012 13:15:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=560061#comment-1727206</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Right the Pats have the easiest schedule based on LAST year. Lets see how much good that does them this upcoming season after every team has made roster changes.

And why are non pats fans analyzing the Pats schedule? Who does that? I haven&#039;t looked at any other teams schedule but my own. Just don&#039;t have that kind of time.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Right the Pats have the easiest schedule based on LAST year. Lets see how much good that does them this upcoming season after every team has made roster changes.</p>
<p>And why are non pats fans analyzing the Pats schedule? Who does that? I haven&#8217;t looked at any other teams schedule but my own. Just don&#8217;t have that kind of time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: getyourownname</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/18/32-takes-on-the-2012-schedule/#comment-1727191</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[getyourownname]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2012 13:03:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=560061#comment-1727191</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[manofsteel3 says: 
Apr 18, 2012 8:11 AM 
“And while the Ravens previously have asked to not play in Pittsburgh at night…”
This still blows my mind, that the freakin Ravens asked not to play in Pittsburgh at night. You’ve got to be kidding me. I cannot recall any other team doing something like this. Request a home game before a Thursday nighter, sure. Request not to have 3 straight on the road. Fine. But asking not to play a division opponent on the road at night. Just embarassing.
**************************
As usual, like the crowd scene in Frankenstein, Florio loves to stoke the uninformed. Makes for a lot more hits on the website.

The facts are that in 2009, after the Ravens had played 3 of the previous 4 years in Pburgh at night prime time games - which everyone knows is an advantage - they requested not to to it yet again after Pburgh had won the Super Bowl and was expected to be awarded a home night opener.  At that time, the Steelers never had to play a night game in Bmore. That request was made one time, 3 years ago, and has not been repeated.

I respect the Steelers but you can&#039;t tell me if the situation was reversed, Steeler fans wouldn&#039;t be annoyed about advantage going to the Ravens.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>manofsteel3 says:<br />
Apr 18, 2012 8:11 AM<br />
“And while the Ravens previously have asked to not play in Pittsburgh at night…”<br />
This still blows my mind, that the freakin Ravens asked not to play in Pittsburgh at night. You’ve got to be kidding me. I cannot recall any other team doing something like this. Request a home game before a Thursday nighter, sure. Request not to have 3 straight on the road. Fine. But asking not to play a division opponent on the road at night. Just embarassing.<br />
**************************<br />
As usual, like the crowd scene in Frankenstein, Florio loves to stoke the uninformed. Makes for a lot more hits on the website.</p>
<p>The facts are that in 2009, after the Ravens had played 3 of the previous 4 years in Pburgh at night prime time games &#8211; which everyone knows is an advantage &#8211; they requested not to to it yet again after Pburgh had won the Super Bowl and was expected to be awarded a home night opener.  At that time, the Steelers never had to play a night game in Bmore. That request was made one time, 3 years ago, and has not been repeated.</p>
<p>I respect the Steelers but you can&#8217;t tell me if the situation was reversed, Steeler fans wouldn&#8217;t be annoyed about advantage going to the Ravens.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: xxsweepthelegxx</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/18/32-takes-on-the-2012-schedule/#comment-1727188</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[xxsweepthelegxx]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2012 13:03:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=560061#comment-1727188</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I love how people get worked up over the schedule like hte NFL plays &quot;favorites.&quot;  It&#039;s based on a formula used, plus two flex games.  The formula has remained the same for years, you can pretty much figure out what conference/non confernece teams YOUR team will play in 2014, 2015, etc...  It&#039;s simple math.  

And no game is easy at schedule release time. If my team had the 49ers on the schedule last year, early on, I&#039;d be calling that an &quot;easy game.&quot;  Then they finish 13-3.  Once you get into the season a little, THEN you can mark down some &quot;Easy&quot; games.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love how people get worked up over the schedule like hte NFL plays &#8220;favorites.&#8221;  It&#8217;s based on a formula used, plus two flex games.  The formula has remained the same for years, you can pretty much figure out what conference/non confernece teams YOUR team will play in 2014, 2015, etc&#8230;  It&#8217;s simple math.  </p>
<p>And no game is easy at schedule release time. If my team had the 49ers on the schedule last year, early on, I&#8217;d be calling that an &#8220;easy game.&#8221;  Then they finish 13-3.  Once you get into the season a little, THEN you can mark down some &#8220;Easy&#8221; games.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mrgdawg</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/18/32-takes-on-the-2012-schedule/#comment-1727187</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[mrgdawg]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2012 13:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=560061#comment-1727187</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[East coast bias once again.  Pats getting fluffed.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>East coast bias once again.  Pats getting fluffed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: billsin20xx</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/18/32-takes-on-the-2012-schedule/#comment-1727152</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[billsin20xx]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2012 12:42:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=560061#comment-1727152</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Notice once again the patriot&#039;s have a sweetheart schedule, the only comment you can make is that 3 of last 4 are home games in the cold?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Notice once again the patriot&#8217;s have a sweetheart schedule, the only comment you can make is that 3 of last 4 are home games in the cold?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jruc</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/18/32-takes-on-the-2012-schedule/#comment-1727141</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jruc]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2012 12:37:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=560061#comment-1727141</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I hope Manning is back to at least 85-90% ....With the same willful team and players from last year, that would make us Superbowl contenders....No one is guranteed to go until they win the Conference Championships though. If you disagree then ask Green Bay and many teams before that that were the best in the league during the regular season but watched the bowl from anywhere but the sidelines with the other 29 teams.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hope Manning is back to at least 85-90% &#8230;.With the same willful team and players from last year, that would make us Superbowl contenders&#8230;.No one is guranteed to go until they win the Conference Championships though. If you disagree then ask Green Bay and many teams before that that were the best in the league during the regular season but watched the bowl from anywhere but the sidelines with the other 29 teams.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 4thqtrsaint</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/18/32-takes-on-the-2012-schedule/#comment-1727124</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[4thqtrsaint]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2012 12:24:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=560061#comment-1727124</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[These were some of the most entertaining posts I have ever read on this site... I&#039;m not being sarcastic either... The readers started today in top form... I got several good laughs this morning. :)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These were some of the most entertaining posts I have ever read on this site&#8230; I&#8217;m not being sarcastic either&#8230; The readers started today in top form&#8230; I got several good laughs this morning. <img src='http://s0.wp.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sj39</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/18/32-takes-on-the-2012-schedule/#comment-1727118</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[sj39]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2012 12:21:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=560061#comment-1727118</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Best schedule the Rams have had in quite a while. I think they will have a much better record than 4 and 4 at the bye.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Best schedule the Rams have had in quite a while. I think they will have a much better record than 4 and 4 at the bye.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
