<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Rookie pool could drop in 2012</title>
	<atom:link href="http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/18/rookie-pool-could-drop-in-2012/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/18/rookie-pool-could-drop-in-2012/</link>
	<description>ProFootballTalk on NBCSports.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 03:26:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: detroitcityryda</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/18/rookie-pool-could-drop-in-2012/#comment-1728241</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[detroitcityryda]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2012 20:39:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=562354#comment-1728241</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Some dudes are really lucky i tell ya Jamarcus Russell is still sippin on that lean and spending his guaranteed Al Davis paper ,and so is Charles Rogers aka I smoke erry day playboy .]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some dudes are really lucky i tell ya Jamarcus Russell is still sippin on that lean and spending his guaranteed Al Davis paper ,and so is Charles Rogers aka I smoke erry day playboy .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: raideralex99</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/18/rookie-pool-could-drop-in-2012/#comment-1727985</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[raideralex99]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2012 18:54:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=562354#comment-1727985</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[All the rookies will like to say ... &quot;Thank-You JaMarcus.&quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All the rookies will like to say &#8230; &#8220;Thank-You JaMarcus.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cometkazie</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/18/rookie-pool-could-drop-in-2012/#comment-1727935</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[cometkazie]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2012 18:17:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=562354#comment-1727935</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Raiders could have saved some money on JaMarcus.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Raiders could have saved some money on JaMarcus.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: theytukrjobs</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/18/rookie-pool-could-drop-in-2012/#comment-1727933</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[theytukrjobs]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2012 18:12:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=562354#comment-1727933</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Classic union influence right there.  Players get a say in how the money is split up and of course they want the funds diverted away from new players entering the league (because those guys have no say).  

When you can lock down a guy like Cam Newton for 4 million a year and you can&#039;t get John Carlson for that, it really adds tremendous value to the draft picks.  A few years ago having the worst record in the NFL meant you get a mediocre QB (Bradford) for top 5 money.  It buried teams deeper.  Once Bradford is really good (assuming he reaches potential) he&#039;ll be hitting the market anyways.  

Now when you finish with a terrible record you can get a great player at reasonable cost.  Panthers have now only 3% or so of their wage tied up in a top 5 QB in Newton which positions them extremely well for the next few years.  A team like Denver spending 6 times that money on their QB is not in nearly as good of a position.  

With the new wage scale I think you&#039;ll truly see team strength cycling more.  Good year, bad year.  And you&#039;ll also see teams forced to trade marquee players for draft picks to stay competitive.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Classic union influence right there.  Players get a say in how the money is split up and of course they want the funds diverted away from new players entering the league (because those guys have no say).  </p>
<p>When you can lock down a guy like Cam Newton for 4 million a year and you can&#8217;t get John Carlson for that, it really adds tremendous value to the draft picks.  A few years ago having the worst record in the NFL meant you get a mediocre QB (Bradford) for top 5 money.  It buried teams deeper.  Once Bradford is really good (assuming he reaches potential) he&#8217;ll be hitting the market anyways.  </p>
<p>Now when you finish with a terrible record you can get a great player at reasonable cost.  Panthers have now only 3% or so of their wage tied up in a top 5 QB in Newton which positions them extremely well for the next few years.  A team like Denver spending 6 times that money on their QB is not in nearly as good of a position.  </p>
<p>With the new wage scale I think you&#8217;ll truly see team strength cycling more.  Good year, bad year.  And you&#8217;ll also see teams forced to trade marquee players for draft picks to stay competitive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EJ</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/18/rookie-pool-could-drop-in-2012/#comment-1727894</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[EJ]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2012 17:51:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=562354#comment-1727894</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Aww, too bad. So these poor rookies will be making 21.2 million instead of 22.5 million. I guess they&#039;ll have to suffer and only buy two Cadillac Escalades instead of three.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Aww, too bad. So these poor rookies will be making 21.2 million instead of 22.5 million. I guess they&#8217;ll have to suffer and only buy two Cadillac Escalades instead of three.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kidfootball</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/18/rookie-pool-could-drop-in-2012/#comment-1727867</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[kidfootball]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2012 17:40:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=562354#comment-1727867</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Is there proof that the rookies get that second payday?

Take for instance RB&#039;s, they have even a shorter career than say, a lineman. Are teams willing to give them a big payday for a body that may be seen to have a lot of &quot;miles&quot; on it?

I think of Matt Forte, he is a big part of that Chicago offense and it&#039;s been an uphill battle for him to snag that multi-year deal that he&#039;s been seeking. 

I don&#039;t agree with giving untested guys large deals, that handicap a team if they are a bust, but I don&#039;t see teams paying Vets much either because of the mileage factor. 

I see this as a huge win for the the owners, they have justification to not pay rookies AND seasoned vets, and they just pocket the difference.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is there proof that the rookies get that second payday?</p>
<p>Take for instance RB&#8217;s, they have even a shorter career than say, a lineman. Are teams willing to give them a big payday for a body that may be seen to have a lot of &#8220;miles&#8221; on it?</p>
<p>I think of Matt Forte, he is a big part of that Chicago offense and it&#8217;s been an uphill battle for him to snag that multi-year deal that he&#8217;s been seeking. </p>
<p>I don&#8217;t agree with giving untested guys large deals, that handicap a team if they are a bust, but I don&#8217;t see teams paying Vets much either because of the mileage factor. </p>
<p>I see this as a huge win for the the owners, they have justification to not pay rookies AND seasoned vets, and they just pocket the difference.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: diehardtwinsfan</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/18/rookie-pool-could-drop-in-2012/#comment-1727859</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[diehardtwinsfan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2012 17:35:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=562354#comment-1727859</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The problem I have is the committment.  I feel sorry for guys at the lower end of the scale who will not make all that much and will get cut suddenly if they have a nasty injury.  If the NFL wants to limit rookie wages, then the players should have asked for shorter contracts... 

That way, a pro-bowler drafted in round 5 will get paid as such sooner rather than working for peanuts, getting hurt, and never getting his pay day.  

The issue here is one of exploitation.  NFL gets an anti-trust exemption so that it can basically run like a trust, but to be fair to the players, they need to be able to make a buck too.  Everyone concentrates on the Jamarcus Russel busts, but they forget that there&#039;s lots of guys who way over perform their salary and the teams will continue to under pay them for as long as possible.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The problem I have is the committment.  I feel sorry for guys at the lower end of the scale who will not make all that much and will get cut suddenly if they have a nasty injury.  If the NFL wants to limit rookie wages, then the players should have asked for shorter contracts&#8230; </p>
<p>That way, a pro-bowler drafted in round 5 will get paid as such sooner rather than working for peanuts, getting hurt, and never getting his pay day.  </p>
<p>The issue here is one of exploitation.  NFL gets an anti-trust exemption so that it can basically run like a trust, but to be fair to the players, they need to be able to make a buck too.  Everyone concentrates on the Jamarcus Russel busts, but they forget that there&#8217;s lots of guys who way over perform their salary and the teams will continue to under pay them for as long as possible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: guitarmaninks</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/18/rookie-pool-could-drop-in-2012/#comment-1727787</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[guitarmaninks]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2012 17:04:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=562354#comment-1727787</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How is it hazing ? Do you start new employees out at a top wage for what they do? Wait until all the former lawyers that worked for you band together and take you to court for not properly informing them concerning losing their souls to Satan]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How is it hazing ? Do you start new employees out at a top wage for what they do? Wait until all the former lawyers that worked for you band together and take you to court for not properly informing them concerning losing their souls to Satan</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chawk12thman</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/18/rookie-pool-could-drop-in-2012/#comment-1727734</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[chawk12thman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2012 16:36:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=562354#comment-1727734</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I agree that the rookie pool should be restricted as it was getting out of hand.  However, it perhaps might help if the rookies were allowed to become free agents one year sooner.  It would allow the real talent to get their justified increased salary, before they lose their abilities due to injury/wear and tear........]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that the rookie pool should be restricted as it was getting out of hand.  However, it perhaps might help if the rookies were allowed to become free agents one year sooner.  It would allow the real talent to get their justified increased salary, before they lose their abilities due to injury/wear and tear&#8230;&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: matthewcarlson1</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/18/rookie-pool-could-drop-in-2012/#comment-1727718</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[matthewcarlson1]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2012 16:29:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=562354#comment-1727718</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Lets lower ticket prices, merch prices, and lower food and drink prices at the stadiums.  The whole industry is making too much money in this economy.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lets lower ticket prices, merch prices, and lower food and drink prices at the stadiums.  The whole industry is making too much money in this economy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jimmymcnultysbottleofjameson</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/18/rookie-pool-could-drop-in-2012/#comment-1727716</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jimmymcnultysbottleofjameson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2012 16:28:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=562354#comment-1727716</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I was good at crushing in college but don&#039;t pay me like TT Boy before my flight lands in The Valley.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was good at crushing in college but don&#8217;t pay me like TT Boy before my flight lands in The Valley.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CKL</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/18/rookie-pool-could-drop-in-2012/#comment-1727664</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CKL]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2012 16:08:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=562354#comment-1727664</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yes, coaches, this level of cap understanding fail  can be YOURS too if you just accept DeSmith as your leader!

I do agree with rookie salaries being lower, but every day we see more and more reason to believe Smith was a bad choice for the players. He either didn&#039;t understand what he was signing/agreeing to or he misled the players to get it  voted in. OR, maybe the players simply are protecting him by not complaining. I just can&#039;t think of any scenarios that let De Smith off the hook though.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, coaches, this level of cap understanding fail  can be YOURS too if you just accept DeSmith as your leader!</p>
<p>I do agree with rookie salaries being lower, but every day we see more and more reason to believe Smith was a bad choice for the players. He either didn&#8217;t understand what he was signing/agreeing to or he misled the players to get it  voted in. OR, maybe the players simply are protecting him by not complaining. I just can&#8217;t think of any scenarios that let De Smith off the hook though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mullman7675</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/18/rookie-pool-could-drop-in-2012/#comment-1727657</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[mullman7675]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2012 16:04:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=562354#comment-1727657</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This truly protects every team blessed/cursed with the top pick.  The cap money is for proven veterans, that is the way it should always be]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This truly protects every team blessed/cursed with the top pick.  The cap money is for proven veterans, that is the way it should always be</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: teamobijuan</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/18/rookie-pool-could-drop-in-2012/#comment-1727617</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[teamobijuan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2012 15:47:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=562354#comment-1727617</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Make the rookie contracts 100% guaranteed for injury if you&#039;re going to make them be smaller, IMO.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Make the rookie contracts 100% guaranteed for injury if you&#8217;re going to make them be smaller, IMO.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jmc000</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/18/rookie-pool-could-drop-in-2012/#comment-1727592</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jmc000]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2012 15:38:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=562354#comment-1727592</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wow my heart is breaking for guys will be making multi-million dollars a year coming out of college. Especially for some who 4 years down the road will probably be getting contracts that total 80-150 million dollars]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow my heart is breaking for guys will be making multi-million dollars a year coming out of college. Especially for some who 4 years down the road will probably be getting contracts that total 80-150 million dollars</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: granadafan</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/18/rookie-pool-could-drop-in-2012/#comment-1727583</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[granadafan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2012 15:35:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=562354#comment-1727583</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The rookie wage scale is the best thing to happen to the NFL.  These guys are rookies and haven&#039;t proven a thing. There are no sure things in the NFL and what you did in college surrounded by superior talent and in the perfect gimmick system means squat in the pros.  

That said, if they&#039;re going to limit rookie contracts, then they also ought to decrease the years so young guys who outperform their initial contract will get a fair shake at earning market salary commenserate with their production.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The rookie wage scale is the best thing to happen to the NFL.  These guys are rookies and haven&#8217;t proven a thing. There are no sure things in the NFL and what you did in college surrounded by superior talent and in the perfect gimmick system means squat in the pros.  </p>
<p>That said, if they&#8217;re going to limit rookie contracts, then they also ought to decrease the years so young guys who outperform their initial contract will get a fair shake at earning market salary commenserate with their production.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: teamobijuan</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/18/rookie-pool-could-drop-in-2012/#comment-1727580</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[teamobijuan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2012 15:33:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=562354#comment-1727580</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You all are so worried and vitriolic about how much the players make who can get injured and be done and cut at any time but completely gloss over the amount of money the Billionaire owners make off of them. Billions, with a B.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You all are so worried and vitriolic about how much the players make who can get injured and be done and cut at any time but completely gloss over the amount of money the Billionaire owners make off of them. Billions, with a B.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: txxxchief</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/18/rookie-pool-could-drop-in-2012/#comment-1727561</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[txxxchief]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2012 15:27:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=562354#comment-1727561</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Do you know how much a tune up on a Lamborghini costs?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do you know how much a tune up on a Lamborghini costs?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: winskins</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/18/rookie-pool-could-drop-in-2012/#comment-1727549</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[winskins]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2012 15:22:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=562354#comment-1727549</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Clearly Sam Bradford is making too much money.  I&#039;m willing to help him out with that, though, and take some off his hands, if he feels bad about it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Clearly Sam Bradford is making too much money.  I&#8217;m willing to help him out with that, though, and take some off his hands, if he feels bad about it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: yahmule</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/18/rookie-pool-could-drop-in-2012/#comment-1727548</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[yahmule]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2012 15:22:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=562354#comment-1727548</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It doesn&#039;t matter how much they make. 50% of them will be broke or deep in debt five years after they leave the NFL.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It doesn&#8217;t matter how much they make. 50% of them will be broke or deep in debt five years after they leave the NFL.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dowhatifeellike</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/18/rookie-pool-could-drop-in-2012/#comment-1727532</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[dowhatifeellike]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2012 15:14:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=562354#comment-1727532</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is a good thing. Not for the players, obviously, but for the franchises overall. I&#039;ve always thought it was dumb to put so much cap space into unproven rookies, many of whom will not play for a few years or may never contribute in a meaningful way. I&#039;m sure if you ask the Rams about Bradford&#039;s contract they&#039;ll tell you he wasn&#039;t worth it even if he IS their guy for the next 10 years.

MLB at least has their drafted player wages under control. Matt Wieters is making $500k this year. He will rake it in on his next contract, but it&#039;ll be for playing well in the Bigs, not for having potential.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a good thing. Not for the players, obviously, but for the franchises overall. I&#8217;ve always thought it was dumb to put so much cap space into unproven rookies, many of whom will not play for a few years or may never contribute in a meaningful way. I&#8217;m sure if you ask the Rams about Bradford&#8217;s contract they&#8217;ll tell you he wasn&#8217;t worth it even if he IS their guy for the next 10 years.</p>
<p>MLB at least has their drafted player wages under control. Matt Wieters is making $500k this year. He will rake it in on his next contract, but it&#8217;ll be for playing well in the Bigs, not for having potential.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: themage78</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/18/rookie-pool-could-drop-in-2012/#comment-1727527</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[themage78]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2012 15:13:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=562354#comment-1727527</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[teamobijuan says: Apr 18, 2012 10:32 AM

I’d hold out after 8 games of doing well if I was a top 5 pick forced to make less than “proven” mediocre veterans.

For every Ryan Leaf and Jamarcus Russel you would like to not have paid a ton, there’s a Peyton Manning and Michael Vick. Imagine Peyton getting a 4 year $22M deal. Sheeeeeeeeeeeeit.
-----------------------------------------------------
Peyton had to play out a 6 year deal. So does Bradford and the like. So while Bradford is still making $13 mill a year for the Rams, Cam could be getting 15-16 mill in a year or two when they tear up his contract. So basically, these rookie deals are better for the rookies because they hit their 2nd contract much earlier, therefore have more potential to earn]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>teamobijuan says: Apr 18, 2012 10:32 AM</p>
<p>I’d hold out after 8 games of doing well if I was a top 5 pick forced to make less than “proven” mediocre veterans.</p>
<p>For every Ryan Leaf and Jamarcus Russel you would like to not have paid a ton, there’s a Peyton Manning and Michael Vick. Imagine Peyton getting a 4 year $22M deal. Sheeeeeeeeeeeeit.<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;<br />
Peyton had to play out a 6 year deal. So does Bradford and the like. So while Bradford is still making $13 mill a year for the Rams, Cam could be getting 15-16 mill in a year or two when they tear up his contract. So basically, these rookie deals are better for the rookies because they hit their 2nd contract much earlier, therefore have more potential to earn</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sepl12</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/18/rookie-pool-could-drop-in-2012/#comment-1727520</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[sepl12]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2012 15:12:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=562354#comment-1727520</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you look at the numbers the contracts for Newton and Bradford aren&#039;t really that different. The only real difference is the team now has options. Without renewing the contact in any way the panthers can give Newton 22 mill for his first four years, about 24 mill for year five and 29 via the franchise tag for year six. for a total of 75 million over six years. All Newton has to do to guarantee that money is live up to being an icon.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you look at the numbers the contracts for Newton and Bradford aren&#8217;t really that different. The only real difference is the team now has options. Without renewing the contact in any way the panthers can give Newton 22 mill for his first four years, about 24 mill for year five and 29 via the franchise tag for year six. for a total of 75 million over six years. All Newton has to do to guarantee that money is live up to being an icon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: exhibits5</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/18/rookie-pool-could-drop-in-2012/#comment-1727505</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[exhibits5]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2012 15:08:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=562354#comment-1727505</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[aww poor RG3 he will only be making 5 million a year what joke this guy he doesnt stand in the pocket for more then 2 seconds before he panics and starts running like a damm fake he is. this guy is another vince young]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>aww poor RG3 he will only be making 5 million a year what joke this guy he doesnt stand in the pocket for more then 2 seconds before he panics and starts running like a damm fake he is. this guy is another vince young</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mcconnellrules</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/18/rookie-pool-could-drop-in-2012/#comment-1727493</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[mcconnellrules]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2012 15:04:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=562354#comment-1727493</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yes, All of us peasants are jealous we don&#039;t make even a fraction of most of the players, even back ups. But, if you look at other players in their respective sports... football players are not paid as well as less dangerous sports (baseball, basketball, tennis etc.) which should be at least on par with sports that wont have adverse effects on their body and minds in the future. 

IMO All Professional sports personnel  are overpaid, its a game. But it is what it is.  If/When I have a kid he WILL be kicking field goals at age 3, gotta get em primed early.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, All of us peasants are jealous we don&#8217;t make even a fraction of most of the players, even back ups. But, if you look at other players in their respective sports&#8230; football players are not paid as well as less dangerous sports (baseball, basketball, tennis etc.) which should be at least on par with sports that wont have adverse effects on their body and minds in the future. </p>
<p>IMO All Professional sports personnel  are overpaid, its a game. But it is what it is.  If/When I have a kid he WILL be kicking field goals at age 3, gotta get em primed early.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nycoccet</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/18/rookie-pool-could-drop-in-2012/#comment-1727489</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[nycoccet]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2012 15:02:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=562354#comment-1727489</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[They can all thank Jamarcus Russell for this. The amount ofmoney he got and being such a bust  scared them enough to finally get this done. This is going to make the league even more competitive and will stop from crippling the the crappy teams]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They can all thank Jamarcus Russell for this. The amount ofmoney he got and being such a bust  scared them enough to finally get this done. This is going to make the league even more competitive and will stop from crippling the the crappy teams</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: profootballwalk</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/18/rookie-pool-could-drop-in-2012/#comment-1727487</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[profootballwalk]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2012 15:01:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=562354#comment-1727487</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[trollhammer20 says: Apr 18, 2012 10:26 AM

Oh, the indignity of having to sign a contract that, by the time you’re 25, earns you ten times what most people make over their entire lifetime. How shall they endure the shame?
------------------------------------------------


Typical of the talentless. The reason they get paid that much is that their talents bring in that much money to their employers. In other words, they are worth every penny. Just as you are worth every cent you earn at Burger Heaven.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>trollhammer20 says: Apr 18, 2012 10:26 AM</p>
<p>Oh, the indignity of having to sign a contract that, by the time you’re 25, earns you ten times what most people make over their entire lifetime. How shall they endure the shame?<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;</p>
<p>Typical of the talentless. The reason they get paid that much is that their talents bring in that much money to their employers. In other words, they are worth every penny. Just as you are worth every cent you earn at Burger Heaven.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: westampa</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/18/rookie-pool-could-drop-in-2012/#comment-1727430</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[westampa]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2012 14:45:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=562354#comment-1727430</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[JAMARCUS RUSSEL]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>JAMARCUS RUSSEL</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: timsmooth</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/18/rookie-pool-could-drop-in-2012/#comment-1727410</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[timsmooth]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2012 14:38:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=562354#comment-1727410</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Unproven talent should NEVER make more than proven veterans!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unproven talent should NEVER make more than proven veterans!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Grulks</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/18/rookie-pool-could-drop-in-2012/#comment-1727403</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Grulks]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2012 14:37:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=562354#comment-1727403</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think this is a good thing, in the sense that teams won&#039;t be incredibly set back if they experience Jamarcus Russel like draft picks. It basically allows them to evaluate their rookies longer, which is nice because the draft is more or less a crap shoot anyhow. It also (hopefully) impresses on incoming rookies that they truly have to work hard to get that second contract. No more &quot;I&#039;m 22 and have $40 million guaranteed, I can practice however I want&quot; attitudes.

However, the flip side to this is predicated on teams recognizing their hard working veterans, and rewarding them appropriately with a second/third contract.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think this is a good thing, in the sense that teams won&#8217;t be incredibly set back if they experience Jamarcus Russel like draft picks. It basically allows them to evaluate their rookies longer, which is nice because the draft is more or less a crap shoot anyhow. It also (hopefully) impresses on incoming rookies that they truly have to work hard to get that second contract. No more &#8220;I&#8217;m 22 and have $40 million guaranteed, I can practice however I want&#8221; attitudes.</p>
<p>However, the flip side to this is predicated on teams recognizing their hard working veterans, and rewarding them appropriately with a second/third contract.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
