<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Team needs:  Green Bay Packers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/22/team-needs-green-bay-packers-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/22/team-needs-green-bay-packers-2/</link>
	<description>ProFootballTalk on NBCSports.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 26 May 2013 03:17:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: supersuckers3</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/22/team-needs-green-bay-packers-2/#comment-1741032</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[supersuckers3]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2012 01:25:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=599054#comment-1741032</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[stairwayto7 says: 
Apr 22, 2012 9:19 PM 
How about a QB who does not choke in the playoffs!

------

Zepplin was a fraudulent cover band]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>stairwayto7 says:<br />
Apr 22, 2012 9:19 PM<br />
How about a QB who does not choke in the playoffs!</p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;</p>
<p>Zepplin was a fraudulent cover band</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lionsdetroitcom</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/22/team-needs-green-bay-packers-2/#comment-1739862</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[lionsdetroitcom]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2012 17:41:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=599054#comment-1739862</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Lions will overtake the Packers this year. I can&#039;t wait!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Lions will overtake the Packers this year. I can&#8217;t wait!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: axespray</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/22/team-needs-green-bay-packers-2/#comment-1737397</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[axespray]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2012 19:59:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=599054#comment-1737397</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If Ted Thompson wanted to create a riot, he&#039;d draft WRs in the 1st 5 rounds.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If Ted Thompson wanted to create a riot, he&#8217;d draft WRs in the 1st 5 rounds.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: patsaintsbroncoscheat</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/22/team-needs-green-bay-packers-2/#comment-1737231</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[patsaintsbroncoscheat]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2012 18:46:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=599054#comment-1737231</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[blackheld says: Apr 22, 2012 7:08 PM

Something little noticed in the rush to anoint Matt Flynn as the next coming of Jesus is that while Flynn was throwing for 480 and six TDs against the Lions third string DBs, Matt Stafford threw for 520 and 5 TDs against Green Bay’s starters.

Green Bay is primed for a drop in the standings this year. Ted Thompson’s approach to team construction works fine when he’s drafting high enough to get quality picks that can step in and start, but the last couple of years that hasn’t really happened. Aside from Raji, there’s been little help in areas of need for the Pack, and this year will be even worse.

Expect Green Bay’s defense to continue to try and live off the big play, and the offense remain forced to outscore their opponents in order to win. Clay Matthews is a special player, and his numbers might have fallen last year, but he had a lot less help, and you can look for that trend to continue in 2012.

As far as Chicago, until their offensive line improves, their success rate is gonna be spotty. Also, if the offensive line doesn’t improve, you can bet Cutler will be looking for a quick trip out of Chicago, if only out of a realistic sense of self-preservation.
_____________________________
This guy is an idiot. There are tons of good picks to be had throughout the draft. We all know real teams are built long after round 1. Nice logic idiot.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>blackheld says: Apr 22, 2012 7:08 PM</p>
<p>Something little noticed in the rush to anoint Matt Flynn as the next coming of Jesus is that while Flynn was throwing for 480 and six TDs against the Lions third string DBs, Matt Stafford threw for 520 and 5 TDs against Green Bay’s starters.</p>
<p>Green Bay is primed for a drop in the standings this year. Ted Thompson’s approach to team construction works fine when he’s drafting high enough to get quality picks that can step in and start, but the last couple of years that hasn’t really happened. Aside from Raji, there’s been little help in areas of need for the Pack, and this year will be even worse.</p>
<p>Expect Green Bay’s defense to continue to try and live off the big play, and the offense remain forced to outscore their opponents in order to win. Clay Matthews is a special player, and his numbers might have fallen last year, but he had a lot less help, and you can look for that trend to continue in 2012.</p>
<p>As far as Chicago, until their offensive line improves, their success rate is gonna be spotty. Also, if the offensive line doesn’t improve, you can bet Cutler will be looking for a quick trip out of Chicago, if only out of a realistic sense of self-preservation.<br />
_____________________________<br />
This guy is an idiot. There are tons of good picks to be had throughout the draft. We all know real teams are built long after round 1. Nice logic idiot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: toolkien</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/22/team-needs-green-bay-packers-2/#comment-1736670</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[toolkien]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2012 14:55:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=599054#comment-1736670</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Lions have won ONE playoff game in 45 years, you have to go back to Bobby Layne in the mid-50&#039;s to find their last franchise QB, last year they had to comeback THREE TIMES from 20 pts down to go 10-6 and could easily have been 7-9, and they still lost to Green Bay, who had NINE starters sitting on the bench, but they&#039;re now ahead of the Packers who have gone 26-5 in their last 31 games with a 19 game winning streak in the middle, having scored the second most points in league history last year. Detriots&#039; defense wasn&#039;t that much different than the Pack last year, in fact the Packers&#039; D was better where counts most - points - than Detroit was. Did Detroit have a nice year last year? Better than they have been, but the Packers are still superior to them. The final game of the year was certainly not representative with so many players out etc, but look at the Thanksgiving game - the Packers shut down the Lions all day, and let the get some garbage points at the end. I can give the Lions some props with Stafford and Johnson, but let&#039;s keep in perspective.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Lions have won ONE playoff game in 45 years, you have to go back to Bobby Layne in the mid-50&#8242;s to find their last franchise QB, last year they had to comeback THREE TIMES from 20 pts down to go 10-6 and could easily have been 7-9, and they still lost to Green Bay, who had NINE starters sitting on the bench, but they&#8217;re now ahead of the Packers who have gone 26-5 in their last 31 games with a 19 game winning streak in the middle, having scored the second most points in league history last year. Detriots&#8217; defense wasn&#8217;t that much different than the Pack last year, in fact the Packers&#8217; D was better where counts most &#8211; points &#8211; than Detroit was. Did Detroit have a nice year last year? Better than they have been, but the Packers are still superior to them. The final game of the year was certainly not representative with so many players out etc, but look at the Thanksgiving game &#8211; the Packers shut down the Lions all day, and let the get some garbage points at the end. I can give the Lions some props with Stafford and Johnson, but let&#8217;s keep in perspective.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: minnesconsin</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/22/team-needs-green-bay-packers-2/#comment-1736521</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[minnesconsin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2012 14:00:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=599054#comment-1736521</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Green Bay already has a 3rd QB, though he may just be a camp arm. They signed Nick Hill back in January. Yeah, the dude who threw almost 100 tds in the AFL last year. ha.

I wouldn&#039;t be surprised at all if the Packers roll with Harrell as the lone backup with either Hill or a late-round / undrafted rookie on the practice squad. They weren&#039;t afraid to take that approach the past two years.  They&#039;re comfortable with Randall Cobb as emergency 3rd QB if both Rodgers and Harrell are injured during a game. Cobb was All-SEC as a freshman QB at Kentucky. 

The Packers are the only team to give Harrell a real shot in the NFL, and they may be on to something. The rap on this guy was mediocre arm strength, and the fact that he played in a spread system at Texas Tech. But the Packers play out of the shotgun with 4-5 wides an awful lot. He&#039;s tall, sees the field, etc.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Green Bay already has a 3rd QB, though he may just be a camp arm. They signed Nick Hill back in January. Yeah, the dude who threw almost 100 tds in the AFL last year. ha.</p>
<p>I wouldn&#8217;t be surprised at all if the Packers roll with Harrell as the lone backup with either Hill or a late-round / undrafted rookie on the practice squad. They weren&#8217;t afraid to take that approach the past two years.  They&#8217;re comfortable with Randall Cobb as emergency 3rd QB if both Rodgers and Harrell are injured during a game. Cobb was All-SEC as a freshman QB at Kentucky. </p>
<p>The Packers are the only team to give Harrell a real shot in the NFL, and they may be on to something. The rap on this guy was mediocre arm strength, and the fact that he played in a spread system at Texas Tech. But the Packers play out of the shotgun with 4-5 wides an awful lot. He&#8217;s tall, sees the field, etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gbmickey</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/22/team-needs-green-bay-packers-2/#comment-1736422</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[gbmickey]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2012 12:45:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=599054#comment-1736422</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The only thing the Packers trail the Lions in are offseason drug arrests.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The only thing the Packers trail the Lions in are offseason drug arrests.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rtmus53</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/22/team-needs-green-bay-packers-2/#comment-1736322</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[rtmus53]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2012 09:52:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=599054#comment-1736322</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[stairwayto7 says: 
Apr 22, 2012 9:19 PM 
How about a QB who does not choke in the playoffs!

Did not choke against your team, now did he? Yinzer fanboy - give it up! 14 months later and STILL whining...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>stairwayto7 says:<br />
Apr 22, 2012 9:19 PM<br />
How about a QB who does not choke in the playoffs!</p>
<p>Did not choke against your team, now did he? Yinzer fanboy &#8211; give it up! 14 months later and STILL whining&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kyannalashae</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/22/team-needs-green-bay-packers-2/#comment-1736293</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[kyannalashae]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2012 06:36:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=599054#comment-1736293</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[wtfru2 says:
Apr 22, 2012 10:27 PM
&#039;&#039;Mathews regressed because he became worried about HGH testing and cut back on the pills! Even his face looked a little plumper and less chiseled. A sure sign of HGH withdrawal&#039;&#039;

Really? Ignorance has taken it&#039;s course...tell me why every time a player who is so good at what he does and just happens to not be on your favorite team has to supposedly be on Steroids? just for the record Clay&#039;s face looked exactly the same from 2010 to 2011 I have pics to prove it (2010 pic) http://www.nflgridirongab.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/12/clay11.jpg

(2011)  http://www.rantsports.com/green-bay-packers/files/2012/01/Clay-Matthews.jpg  if you think he is doing HGH because of his facial features take a BIG LOOK at his daddy and granddaddy&#039;s pics http://www.6magazineonline.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/clay-matthews-sr.-clay-matthews-jr.-clay-matthews-iii.jpg 
and they all have the same exact features...it runs in the family!!!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>wtfru2 says:<br />
Apr 22, 2012 10:27 PM<br />
&#8221;Mathews regressed because he became worried about HGH testing and cut back on the pills! Even his face looked a little plumper and less chiseled. A sure sign of HGH withdrawal&#8221;</p>
<p>Really? Ignorance has taken it&#8217;s course&#8230;tell me why every time a player who is so good at what he does and just happens to not be on your favorite team has to supposedly be on Steroids? just for the record Clay&#8217;s face looked exactly the same from 2010 to 2011 I have pics to prove it (2010 pic) <a href="http://www.nflgridirongab.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/12/clay11.jpg" rel="nofollow">http://www.nflgridirongab.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/12/clay11.jpg</a></p>
<p>(2011)  <a href="http://www.rantsports.com/green-bay-packers/files/2012/01/Clay-Matthews.jpg" rel="nofollow">http://www.rantsports.com/green-bay-packers/files/2012/01/Clay-Matthews.jpg</a>  if you think he is doing HGH because of his facial features take a BIG LOOK at his daddy and granddaddy&#8217;s pics <a href="http://www.6magazineonline.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/clay-matthews-sr.-clay-matthews-jr.-clay-matthews-iii.jpg" rel="nofollow">http://www.6magazineonline.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/clay-matthews-sr.-clay-matthews-jr.-clay-matthews-iii.jpg</a><br />
and they all have the same exact features&#8230;it runs in the family!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cornerblitz</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/22/team-needs-green-bay-packers-2/#comment-1736280</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[cornerblitz]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2012 05:25:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=599054#comment-1736280</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[All you who are so quick to peg Mathews for performance enhancers are either young and stupid, jealous or clueless about the game of football.  Probably a combination of at least some the above.  Check this out:  When a player does really well one year (especially when his team wins the muhfuggin&#039; SUPERBOWL) teams are especially focused on stopping him the next year.  Why do I feel like I&#039;m patronizing a bunch of kindergartners?  This is pretty basic stuff.  Mathews is a class act off the field and an all pro on it.  He was double teamed nearly every play last year and still has as many hits on QB/disruptions as ever in spite of it.  Just watch and really pay attention sometime before you post such offensive remarks.  Believe me, go back and watch the film, his quality of play absolutely DID NOT drop after the HGH stuff started.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All you who are so quick to peg Mathews for performance enhancers are either young and stupid, jealous or clueless about the game of football.  Probably a combination of at least some the above.  Check this out:  When a player does really well one year (especially when his team wins the muhfuggin&#8217; SUPERBOWL) teams are especially focused on stopping him the next year.  Why do I feel like I&#8217;m patronizing a bunch of kindergartners?  This is pretty basic stuff.  Mathews is a class act off the field and an all pro on it.  He was double teamed nearly every play last year and still has as many hits on QB/disruptions as ever in spite of it.  Just watch and really pay attention sometime before you post such offensive remarks.  Believe me, go back and watch the film, his quality of play absolutely DID NOT drop after the HGH stuff started.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shaggytoodle</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/22/team-needs-green-bay-packers-2/#comment-1736214</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[shaggytoodle]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2012 03:55:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=599054#comment-1736214</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[stairwayto7 says:Apr 22, 2012 9:19 PM 

How about a QB who does not choke in the playoffs!
 
It does suck that he and the rest of the Pack choked in the playoffs last season, but Rodgers hasn&#039;t choked in a Superbowl.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>stairwayto7 says:Apr 22, 2012 9:19 PM </p>
<p>How about a QB who does not choke in the playoffs!</p>
<p>It does suck that he and the rest of the Pack choked in the playoffs last season, but Rodgers hasn&#8217;t choked in a Superbowl.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mrninetysixchamps</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/22/team-needs-green-bay-packers-2/#comment-1736185</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[mrninetysixchamps]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2012 03:28:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=599054#comment-1736185</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If that defense improves at all I think we are favorites to win it all next season.. Go Pack!!!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If that defense improves at all I think we are favorites to win it all next season.. Go Pack!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stevenfbrackett</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/22/team-needs-green-bay-packers-2/#comment-1736144</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[stevenfbrackett]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2012 02:29:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=599054#comment-1736144</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think one can tell what the general consensus is on their 3rd string QB Graham Herrell by how he has been completely absent from every single discussion about Flynn leaving and what the Packers should do now that he&#039;s gone.  Haven&#039;t heard his name once.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think one can tell what the general consensus is on their 3rd string QB Graham Herrell by how he has been completely absent from every single discussion about Flynn leaving and what the Packers should do now that he&#8217;s gone.  Haven&#8217;t heard his name once.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wtfru2</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/22/team-needs-green-bay-packers-2/#comment-1736137</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[wtfru2]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2012 02:27:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=599054#comment-1736137</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mathews regressed because he became worried about HGH testing and cut back on the pills! Even his face looked a little plumper and less chiseled. A sure sign of HGH withdrawl.....]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mathews regressed because he became worried about HGH testing and cut back on the pills! Even his face looked a little plumper and less chiseled. A sure sign of HGH withdrawl&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: philrhayader</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/22/team-needs-green-bay-packers-2/#comment-1736125</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[philrhayader]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2012 02:15:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=599054#comment-1736125</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I wouldn&#039;t mind seeing them take Russell Wilson for the backup QB position.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wouldn&#8217;t mind seeing them take Russell Wilson for the backup QB position.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: beerbratscheese</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/22/team-needs-green-bay-packers-2/#comment-1736116</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[beerbratscheese]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2012 02:01:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=599054#comment-1736116</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[blackheld says:  Something little noticed in the rush to anoint Matt Flynn as the next coming of Jesus is that while Flynn was throwing for 480 and six TDs against the Lions third string DBs, Matt Stafford threw for 520 and 5 TDs against Green Bay’s starters.

-----------

Here&#039;s a thought..if you don&#039;t have a clue, shut up!

Charles Woodson didn&#039;t even play in the game and Nick Collins was on IR.  Also, Clay Matthews, who dropped into coverage a lot more frequently last season, did not play.

It was actually the Lions that played most of their starters into the 4th quarter.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>blackheld says:  Something little noticed in the rush to anoint Matt Flynn as the next coming of Jesus is that while Flynn was throwing for 480 and six TDs against the Lions third string DBs, Matt Stafford threw for 520 and 5 TDs against Green Bay’s starters.</p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s a thought..if you don&#8217;t have a clue, shut up!</p>
<p>Charles Woodson didn&#8217;t even play in the game and Nick Collins was on IR.  Also, Clay Matthews, who dropped into coverage a lot more frequently last season, did not play.</p>
<p>It was actually the Lions that played most of their starters into the 4th quarter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stairwayto7</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/22/team-needs-green-bay-packers-2/#comment-1736066</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[stairwayto7]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2012 01:19:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=599054#comment-1736066</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How about a QB who does not choke in the playoffs!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How about a QB who does not choke in the playoffs!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: leatherface2012</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/22/team-needs-green-bay-packers-2/#comment-1736011</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[leatherface2012]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2012 00:44:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=599054#comment-1736011</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[just a what if....if rodgers goes down in week 2 for the rest of the year, and they lose 22 starters on offense and defense, and the 2nd stringers, do they still finish 14-2?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>just a what if&#8230;.if rodgers goes down in week 2 for the rest of the year, and they lose 22 starters on offense and defense, and the 2nd stringers, do they still finish 14-2?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: emoney826</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/22/team-needs-green-bay-packers-2/#comment-1736004</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[emoney826]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2012 00:35:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=599054#comment-1736004</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Lol the 15-1 Lions fans are out running their mouths again. You were swept last year by the Packers, one of those losses to a backup QB. You&#039;ve got ways to go before you can overtake the pack. Keep trying one year wild card, keep trying...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lol the 15-1 Lions fans are out running their mouths again. You were swept last year by the Packers, one of those losses to a backup QB. You&#8217;ve got ways to go before you can overtake the pack. Keep trying one year wild card, keep trying&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ditka96</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/22/team-needs-green-bay-packers-2/#comment-1735967</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ditka96]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2012 00:01:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=599054#comment-1735967</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;Jeff Saturday will serve as a finger-in-the-dike at the center position.&quot;
Huhuhuhuh!   Finger in the dike....]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Jeff Saturday will serve as a finger-in-the-dike at the center position.&#8221;<br />
Huhuhuhuh!   Finger in the dike&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nickynick04</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/22/team-needs-green-bay-packers-2/#comment-1735930</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[nickynick04]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Apr 2012 23:22:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=599054#comment-1735930</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Soulman45 says:Apr 22, 2012 6:07 PM 

The Pack is just behind the Lions.

I would really like to know how you can to this conclussion. ?
Was it because the Packers beat the Lions in Detroit last year ?
Or was it because we beat the Lions with our back ups in Green Bay...just wondering...?
or are you just a know nothing loud mouth Philadelphia eagle fan type who just says things to hear his voice ...basing nothing on fact...Yes...the pack will beat yo guys twice again this year......there,,I made a statement just like you,,,with zero logic behind it except the track record of the Lions of losing]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Soulman45 says:Apr 22, 2012 6:07 PM </p>
<p>The Pack is just behind the Lions.</p>
<p>I would really like to know how you can to this conclussion. ?<br />
Was it because the Packers beat the Lions in Detroit last year ?<br />
Or was it because we beat the Lions with our back ups in Green Bay&#8230;just wondering&#8230;?<br />
or are you just a know nothing loud mouth Philadelphia eagle fan type who just says things to hear his voice &#8230;basing nothing on fact&#8230;Yes&#8230;the pack will beat yo guys twice again this year&#8230;&#8230;there,,I made a statement just like you,,,with zero logic behind it except the track record of the Lions of losing</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: blackheld</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/22/team-needs-green-bay-packers-2/#comment-1735925</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[blackheld]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Apr 2012 23:08:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=599054#comment-1735925</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Something little noticed in the rush to anoint Matt Flynn as the next coming of Jesus is that while Flynn was throwing for 480 and six TDs against the Lions third string DBs, Matt Stafford threw for 520 and 5 TDs against Green Bay&#039;s starters.

Green Bay is primed for a drop in the standings this year.  Ted Thompson&#039;s approach to team construction works fine when he&#039;s drafting high enough to get quality picks that can step in and start, but the last couple of years that hasn&#039;t really happened.  Aside from Raji, there&#039;s been little help in areas of need for the Pack, and this year will be even worse.

Expect Green Bay&#039;s defense to continue to try and live off the big play, and the offense remain forced to outscore their opponents in order to win.  Clay Matthews is a special player, and his numbers might have fallen last year, but he had a lot less help, and you can look for that trend to continue in 2012.

As far as Chicago, until their offensive line improves, their success rate is gonna be spotty.   Also, if the offensive line doesn&#039;t improve, you can bet Cutler will be looking for a quick trip out of Chicago, if only out of a realistic sense of self-preservation.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Something little noticed in the rush to anoint Matt Flynn as the next coming of Jesus is that while Flynn was throwing for 480 and six TDs against the Lions third string DBs, Matt Stafford threw for 520 and 5 TDs against Green Bay&#8217;s starters.</p>
<p>Green Bay is primed for a drop in the standings this year.  Ted Thompson&#8217;s approach to team construction works fine when he&#8217;s drafting high enough to get quality picks that can step in and start, but the last couple of years that hasn&#8217;t really happened.  Aside from Raji, there&#8217;s been little help in areas of need for the Pack, and this year will be even worse.</p>
<p>Expect Green Bay&#8217;s defense to continue to try and live off the big play, and the offense remain forced to outscore their opponents in order to win.  Clay Matthews is a special player, and his numbers might have fallen last year, but he had a lot less help, and you can look for that trend to continue in 2012.</p>
<p>As far as Chicago, until their offensive line improves, their success rate is gonna be spotty.   Also, if the offensive line doesn&#8217;t improve, you can bet Cutler will be looking for a quick trip out of Chicago, if only out of a realistic sense of self-preservation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jazzytrav</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/22/team-needs-green-bay-packers-2/#comment-1735923</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jazzytrav]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Apr 2012 23:07:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=599054#comment-1735923</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Any QB that gets drafted will start out as 3rd string or practice squad.  Graham Harrell is the backup, and anyone that has watched the Packers put this team together the past few years should know that.  I wouldn&#039;t even be surprised to see them go with just Rodgers and Harrell, with perhaps a UDFA on the practice squad.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Any QB that gets drafted will start out as 3rd string or practice squad.  Graham Harrell is the backup, and anyone that has watched the Packers put this team together the past few years should know that.  I wouldn&#8217;t even be surprised to see them go with just Rodgers and Harrell, with perhaps a UDFA on the practice squad.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: steelerhypocrite</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/22/team-needs-green-bay-packers-2/#comment-1735911</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[steelerhypocrite]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Apr 2012 22:56:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=599054#comment-1735911</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Should have kept Flynn, a much better bargain and system QB than Rogers...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Should have kept Flynn, a much better bargain and system QB than Rogers&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: teal379</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/22/team-needs-green-bay-packers-2/#comment-1735909</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[teal379]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Apr 2012 22:54:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=599054#comment-1735909</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Watch football much?

Guessing not.

Clay didn&#039;t regress at ALL. He routinely commanded the only double and triple teams when he was asked to rush the passer.

Problem is he was also asked to play in pass coverage more last year than EVER. 

His sacks were down but that&#039;s to be expected when you&#039;re not RUSHING the passer as much as before. 

If anything he became a more complete LB last year than he was the year before. 

Packers need D help but not because of Clay but to help the guy.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Watch football much?</p>
<p>Guessing not.</p>
<p>Clay didn&#8217;t regress at ALL. He routinely commanded the only double and triple teams when he was asked to rush the passer.</p>
<p>Problem is he was also asked to play in pass coverage more last year than EVER. </p>
<p>His sacks were down but that&#8217;s to be expected when you&#8217;re not RUSHING the passer as much as before. </p>
<p>If anything he became a more complete LB last year than he was the year before. </p>
<p>Packers need D help but not because of Clay but to help the guy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shieldsisland37</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/22/team-needs-green-bay-packers-2/#comment-1735905</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[shieldsisland37]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Apr 2012 22:47:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=599054#comment-1735905</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I hope &quot;WE&quot; draft that saftey from ND.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hope &#8220;WE&#8221; draft that saftey from ND.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: superdanlp</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/22/team-needs-green-bay-packers-2/#comment-1735877</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[superdanlp]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Apr 2012 22:29:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=599054#comment-1735877</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Anyone who thinks Matthews &quot;regressed&quot; just because he didn&#039;t put up the same sack numbers has no clue what they are talking about.  Matthews had a much better overall season than he did before.  Try watching film instead of the stat line.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anyone who thinks Matthews &#8220;regressed&#8221; just because he didn&#8217;t put up the same sack numbers has no clue what they are talking about.  Matthews had a much better overall season than he did before.  Try watching film instead of the stat line.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Soulman45</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/22/team-needs-green-bay-packers-2/#comment-1735847</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Soulman45]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Apr 2012 22:07:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=599054#comment-1735847</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Pack is just behind the Lions.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Pack is just behind the Lions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jimmysee</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/22/team-needs-green-bay-packers-2/#comment-1735846</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jimmysee]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Apr 2012 22:06:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=599054#comment-1735846</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Matthews regressed because one guy can&#039;t play defense all by himself.

At least not in the NFL.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Matthews regressed because one guy can&#8217;t play defense all by himself.</p>
<p>At least not in the NFL.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: packernation90</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/22/team-needs-green-bay-packers-2/#comment-1735845</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[packernation90]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Apr 2012 22:06:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=599054#comment-1735845</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Matthews did not regress.  He had his best season as a pro.  He did get worse in number of sacks, but that is it.  He was the only person who put pressure on the qb, so he got double teamed every play.  He played great against the run, and was great in coverage.  Don&#039;t look at one statistic and grade a player off of it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Matthews did not regress.  He had his best season as a pro.  He did get worse in number of sacks, but that is it.  He was the only person who put pressure on the qb, so he got double teamed every play.  He played great against the run, and was great in coverage.  Don&#8217;t look at one statistic and grade a player off of it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
