<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Browns trade up to the No. 3 overall pick</title>
	<atom:link href="http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/26/browns-trade-up-to-the-no-3-overall-pick/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/26/browns-trade-up-to-the-no-3-overall-pick/</link>
	<description>ProFootballTalk on NBCSports.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 22:42:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: geezohman</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/26/browns-trade-up-to-the-no-3-overall-pick/#comment-1757028</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[geezohman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2012 19:10:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=624327#comment-1757028</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[well now the grades are in, and the sports media sites give the Browns a &quot;C&quot; grade while the rest of the teams in the Divison get higher.

An especially interesting ESPN site gives rankings before and after.  Lets see ..Browns .. before the draft were at &#039;30&quot;.. ,(Ravens moved up and Steelers moved up.).
the Browns after the draft.. is.. &#039;30&#039;..  NO CHANGE...  duh

Last time a RB was picked up in the first round was.... Reggie Bush.. 2006... (same year Vince Young was picked)

It&#039;s a passing league now.. and WR should have been grabbed &#039;first&#039; or at least offense lineman.. and with Cleveland grabbing a QB at spot 22 ,   the best offense lineman FELL right into the Steelers lap,  Big Ben had to fall off his bar stool !

And with rival North division teams (Ravens and Steelers with top rated defense,    T-Rich will be like his former ALabama RB drafted last year.. now with New Orleans, even was a Heisman Trophy winner in his sophmore year.  Oh.. he had not even 500 yards rushing as Drew threw a ton of passes.  ! lol

Browns.. (alias... Clowns)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>well now the grades are in, and the sports media sites give the Browns a &#8220;C&#8221; grade while the rest of the teams in the Divison get higher.</p>
<p>An especially interesting ESPN site gives rankings before and after.  Lets see ..Browns .. before the draft were at &#8217;30&#8243;.. ,(Ravens moved up and Steelers moved up.).<br />
the Browns after the draft.. is.. &#8217;30&#8242;..  NO CHANGE&#8230;  duh</p>
<p>Last time a RB was picked up in the first round was&#8230;. Reggie Bush.. 2006&#8230; (same year Vince Young was picked)</p>
<p>It&#8217;s a passing league now.. and WR should have been grabbed &#8216;first&#8217; or at least offense lineman.. and with Cleveland grabbing a QB at spot 22 ,   the best offense lineman FELL right into the Steelers lap,  Big Ben had to fall off his bar stool !</p>
<p>And with rival North division teams (Ravens and Steelers with top rated defense,    T-Rich will be like his former ALabama RB drafted last year.. now with New Orleans, even was a Heisman Trophy winner in his sophmore year.  Oh.. he had not even 500 yards rushing as Drew threw a ton of passes.  ! lol</p>
<p>Browns.. (alias&#8230; Clowns)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: olendosaysgobrowns</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/26/browns-trade-up-to-the-no-3-overall-pick/#comment-1750510</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[olendosaysgobrowns]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Apr 2012 02:09:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=624327#comment-1750510</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Also how the hell are the Browns gonna trade a 5th and 7th rounder for Wallace when the Franchise tag CLEARLY makes it a mandatory 1st, and I would never do that. And any of you extremely arrogant Steelers fans, check your iq level. Are you guys that dumb that you can&#039;t see that they are one year away from rebuilding. They&#039;re older than a senior center team, and their days of glory are done for a while, especially since the Steelers GM obviously can&#039;t realize that half their defense retired and the other half goes next year, but 2 offensive linemen with their 2 picks, yeah pure genius team you root for. see y&#039;all on the field this year, be ready]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also how the hell are the Browns gonna trade a 5th and 7th rounder for Wallace when the Franchise tag CLEARLY makes it a mandatory 1st, and I would never do that. And any of you extremely arrogant Steelers fans, check your iq level. Are you guys that dumb that you can&#8217;t see that they are one year away from rebuilding. They&#8217;re older than a senior center team, and their days of glory are done for a while, especially since the Steelers GM obviously can&#8217;t realize that half their defense retired and the other half goes next year, but 2 offensive linemen with their 2 picks, yeah pure genius team you root for. see y&#8217;all on the field this year, be ready</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: olendosaysgobrowns</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/26/browns-trade-up-to-the-no-3-overall-pick/#comment-1750454</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[olendosaysgobrowns]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Apr 2012 01:55:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=624327#comment-1750454</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Obviously noone knew of the smokescreen the Bucs were throwin up sayin they wanted to trade up n get T-Rich. Everybody dogs the Browns for not taking any chances, and when they do and draft someone who will soon be the best back in the division, they get dogged for taking that chance. WTF do my fellow Brownie fans want? This is year 3, and Holmgen said it would take 5 yrs to make the playoffs. If you dont know football please don&#039;t comment cause it&#039;s gonna b 2 more yrs til we&#039;re good. Accept it, sit back, and enjoy. We had one of the most exciting defenses last yr,now it&#039;s the offenses turn, and T-Rich and Weeden will immediately make this team better, not to mention the RT with the third pick.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obviously noone knew of the smokescreen the Bucs were throwin up sayin they wanted to trade up n get T-Rich. Everybody dogs the Browns for not taking any chances, and when they do and draft someone who will soon be the best back in the division, they get dogged for taking that chance. WTF do my fellow Brownie fans want? This is year 3, and Holmgen said it would take 5 yrs to make the playoffs. If you dont know football please don&#8217;t comment cause it&#8217;s gonna b 2 more yrs til we&#8217;re good. Accept it, sit back, and enjoy. We had one of the most exciting defenses last yr,now it&#8217;s the offenses turn, and T-Rich and Weeden will immediately make this team better, not to mention the RT with the third pick.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: geezohman</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/26/browns-trade-up-to-the-no-3-overall-pick/#comment-1749975</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[geezohman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2012 21:42:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=624327#comment-1749975</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[oh good Vikes..

ahhh yeah.. the Bucs want to move up.. ahhh yeah.. they want RB.

(never mind they were the worst defense in the league).. oh BTW, they picked a Safety.

Read other posts.. RB are not that critical in this pass happy league, let only moving up for one, let only picking ALabama.. go study Mark Ingram, Heisman Trophy winner sophmore year, Championship team BUT picked in 2nd round by New Orleans.. oh.. 2011 stats.. less than 500 yards.

Yeah.. Holmgren... Vikings got back at you (from Green Bay).. they (Vikings) still got to be laughing]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>oh good Vikes..</p>
<p>ahhh yeah.. the Bucs want to move up.. ahhh yeah.. they want RB.</p>
<p>(never mind they were the worst defense in the league).. oh BTW, they picked a Safety.</p>
<p>Read other posts.. RB are not that critical in this pass happy league, let only moving up for one, let only picking ALabama.. go study Mark Ingram, Heisman Trophy winner sophmore year, Championship team BUT picked in 2nd round by New Orleans.. oh.. 2011 stats.. less than 500 yards.</p>
<p>Yeah.. Holmgren&#8230; Vikings got back at you (from Green Bay).. they (Vikings) still got to be laughing</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gnutella0</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/26/browns-trade-up-to-the-no-3-overall-pick/#comment-1748817</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[gnutella0]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2012 14:52:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=624327#comment-1748817</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Trent Richardson pick doesn&#039;t make much sense to me, and here&#039;s why:

1. The Browns have enough needs that zeroing in on one player is myopic, especially since RB wasn&#039;t even their biggest need.

2. RBs are the most expendable position on a football team, so there&#039;s no reason to draft a RB higher than the second half of the first round.

3. They got impatient and traded up one position with a team that didn&#039;t even need who they wanted.

4. Just because you have a lot of draft picks doesn&#039;t mean you should throw them around. If you were a billionaire, would you burn stacks of $20 bills in the fireplace just because?

5. If you&#039;re worried that somebody else could have traded above you for Richardson, refer to #1 above.

6. Trading up is seldom necessary, and the best teams seldom do it.  One team in particular stayed put and managed to draft David DeCastro.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Trent Richardson pick doesn&#8217;t make much sense to me, and here&#8217;s why:</p>
<p>1. The Browns have enough needs that zeroing in on one player is myopic, especially since RB wasn&#8217;t even their biggest need.</p>
<p>2. RBs are the most expendable position on a football team, so there&#8217;s no reason to draft a RB higher than the second half of the first round.</p>
<p>3. They got impatient and traded up one position with a team that didn&#8217;t even need who they wanted.</p>
<p>4. Just because you have a lot of draft picks doesn&#8217;t mean you should throw them around. If you were a billionaire, would you burn stacks of $20 bills in the fireplace just because?</p>
<p>5. If you&#8217;re worried that somebody else could have traded above you for Richardson, refer to #1 above.</p>
<p>6. Trading up is seldom necessary, and the best teams seldom do it.  One team in particular stayed put and managed to draft David DeCastro.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: randomcommenter</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/26/browns-trade-up-to-the-no-3-overall-pick/#comment-1747020</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[randomcommenter]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2012 00:19:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=624327#comment-1747020</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Now Richardson can get busy not being effective against the steelers.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now Richardson can get busy not being effective against the steelers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vikesfansteve</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/26/browns-trade-up-to-the-no-3-overall-pick/#comment-1746992</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[vikesfansteve]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2012 00:12:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=624327#comment-1746992</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Now turn around and trade the extra 5th &amp; 7th picks to Pittsburgh for Wallace.

13 picks is a lot.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now turn around and trade the extra 5th &amp; 7th picks to Pittsburgh for Wallace.</p>
<p>13 picks is a lot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stratus5ss</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/26/browns-trade-up-to-the-no-3-overall-pick/#comment-1746986</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[stratus5ss]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2012 00:10:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=624327#comment-1746986</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Who is calling the shots in Cleveland? Butch Davis? Trading up one spot is a fools game.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who is calling the shots in Cleveland? Butch Davis? Trading up one spot is a fools game.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: damaddhatter29</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/26/browns-trade-up-to-the-no-3-overall-pick/#comment-1746981</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[damaddhatter29]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2012 00:08:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=624327#comment-1746981</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I would assume the Browns arent taking a runningback then since they only moved up to grab a particular player with a team who is set at runningback.  How far will Richardson drop then?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would assume the Browns arent taking a runningback then since they only moved up to grab a particular player with a team who is set at runningback.  How far will Richardson drop then?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nepats12</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/26/browns-trade-up-to-the-no-3-overall-pick/#comment-1746978</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[nepats12]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2012 00:07:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=624327#comment-1746978</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wow well played by browns. Skins give up multiple 1s and 2s for the 2 pick.... BrOwns only give up a 4 5 7 for the three???]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow well played by browns. Skins give up multiple 1s and 2s for the 2 pick&#8230;. BrOwns only give up a 4 5 7 for the three???</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ricardocabeza</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/26/browns-trade-up-to-the-no-3-overall-pick/#comment-1746977</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ricardocabeza]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2012 00:06:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=624327#comment-1746977</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Does anyone else worry that 7thlombariontheway might be the local neighborhood watch captain?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does anyone else worry that 7thlombariontheway might be the local neighborhood watch captain?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: purpleguy</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/26/browns-trade-up-to-the-no-3-overall-pick/#comment-1746965</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[purpleguy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2012 00:01:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=624327#comment-1746965</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dumbest &quot;mover&quot; ever there Lionpride?  What the heck are you talking about -- are you thinking the Browns are going to draft a delivery boy or something?  Someone with lousy dance moves?  What?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dumbest &#8220;mover&#8221; ever there Lionpride?  What the heck are you talking about &#8212; are you thinking the Browns are going to draft a delivery boy or something?  Someone with lousy dance moves?  What?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nflfollower</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/26/browns-trade-up-to-the-no-3-overall-pick/#comment-1746962</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[nflfollower]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2012 00:01:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=624327#comment-1746962</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Egh the vikes just got a lot of picks.   Good move for them, although I hate to see it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Egh the vikes just got a lot of picks.   Good move for them, although I hate to see it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zn0rseman</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/26/browns-trade-up-to-the-no-3-overall-pick/#comment-1746958</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[zn0rseman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2012 23:59:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=624327#comment-1746958</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m amazed at all of the retards who don&#039;t realize that I&#039;d the Browns hadn&#039;t traded up, the Bucs would have.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m amazed at all of the retards who don&#8217;t realize that I&#8217;d the Browns hadn&#8217;t traded up, the Bucs would have.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thejuddstir</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/26/browns-trade-up-to-the-no-3-overall-pick/#comment-1746939</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[thejuddstir]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2012 23:55:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=624327#comment-1746939</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Vikes had Browns over a barrell if the Browns really wanted Richardson as the Bucs really wanted him also. Look for Vikes to try and trade back again as everyone they want is still on the board, Kalil, Clayborne and Blackmon but I don&#039;t see them seriously considering Blackmon but if a bluff works so be it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Vikes had Browns over a barrell if the Browns really wanted Richardson as the Bucs really wanted him also. Look for Vikes to try and trade back again as everyone they want is still on the board, Kalil, Clayborne and Blackmon but I don&#8217;t see them seriously considering Blackmon but if a bluff works so be it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: peachyc39</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/26/browns-trade-up-to-the-no-3-overall-pick/#comment-1746936</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[peachyc39]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2012 23:54:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=624327#comment-1746936</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I would have to give it to the Vikes for being the best bluffers in this year&#039;s draft...at least so far..lol]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would have to give it to the Vikes for being the best bluffers in this year&#8217;s draft&#8230;at least so far..lol</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 561bengal</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/26/browns-trade-up-to-the-no-3-overall-pick/#comment-1746930</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[561bengal]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2012 23:52:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=624327#comment-1746930</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Go get your man Cleveland! As a Bengal fan its time Ohio dominates the AFC north again.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Go get your man Cleveland! As a Bengal fan its time Ohio dominates the AFC north again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: flannlv</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/26/browns-trade-up-to-the-no-3-overall-pick/#comment-1746929</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[flannlv]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2012 23:52:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=624327#comment-1746929</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Minnesota* Vikings are doing a lot to help out Los Angeles.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Minnesota* Vikings are doing a lot to help out Los Angeles.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: southpaw77</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/26/browns-trade-up-to-the-no-3-overall-pick/#comment-1746926</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[southpaw77]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2012 23:51:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=624327#comment-1746926</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Get Richardson, put him on the madden cover in 2013 and let the Cleveland sports curse continue.

Maybe the Browns can work on joining the rest of the NFL by having cheerleaders and a logo instead of having an orange blob on FOX when they show the scores, wasn&#039;t till years ago they finally put up a ring of honor with famous players inside the stadium.
Clueless franchise with Lerner as an owner.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Get Richardson, put him on the madden cover in 2013 and let the Cleveland sports curse continue.</p>
<p>Maybe the Browns can work on joining the rest of the NFL by having cheerleaders and a logo instead of having an orange blob on FOX when they show the scores, wasn&#8217;t till years ago they finally put up a ring of honor with famous players inside the stadium.<br />
Clueless franchise with Lerner as an owner.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: samoanjungle</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/26/browns-trade-up-to-the-no-3-overall-pick/#comment-1746925</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[samoanjungle]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2012 23:51:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=624327#comment-1746925</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Makes no sense unless there was an offer the Vikes had from someone else and Cleveland wanted to beat it. But for a RB when there will be guys like Blackmon &amp; Claiborne available? He must be special or the Browns are dumb.

Oh and @7thlombardiontheway - the Steelers have still been bad more than they have been good. It took them 40 years to even get to the playoffs even when there were hardly any teams in the league. They weren&#039;t so great in the 80s either when the Bengals &amp; Browns owned the division for the most part.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Makes no sense unless there was an offer the Vikes had from someone else and Cleveland wanted to beat it. But for a RB when there will be guys like Blackmon &amp; Claiborne available? He must be special or the Browns are dumb.</p>
<p>Oh and @7thlombardiontheway &#8211; the Steelers have still been bad more than they have been good. It took them 40 years to even get to the playoffs even when there were hardly any teams in the league. They weren&#8217;t so great in the 80s either when the Bengals &amp; Browns owned the division for the most part.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: redhanded48</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/26/browns-trade-up-to-the-no-3-overall-pick/#comment-1746915</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[redhanded48]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2012 23:48:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=624327#comment-1746915</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Where are all the people saying the Browns gave up their 1st, 4th,5th and 7th round picks? Somehow deleted in the article is that fact? Didn&#039;t the Redskins swap this years first round picks but somehow came out that they gave up 3 first round picks? Ahh its easier to hate on the Redskins then it is the Browns. Maybe Mike Holmgren thinks the Redskins will forget to draft RG3 and they will get him?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Where are all the people saying the Browns gave up their 1st, 4th,5th and 7th round picks? Somehow deleted in the article is that fact? Didn&#8217;t the Redskins swap this years first round picks but somehow came out that they gave up 3 first round picks? Ahh its easier to hate on the Redskins then it is the Browns. Maybe Mike Holmgren thinks the Redskins will forget to draft RG3 and they will get him?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stoptrippn</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/26/browns-trade-up-to-the-no-3-overall-pick/#comment-1746913</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[stoptrippn]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2012 23:47:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=624327#comment-1746913</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Clearly Tampa bay is in the hotseat]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Clearly Tampa bay is in the hotseat</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chiefsfaninpa</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/26/browns-trade-up-to-the-no-3-overall-pick/#comment-1746911</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[chiefsfaninpa]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2012 23:47:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=624327#comment-1746911</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Do the Browns even have an offensive line that can open holes for him to run through or will they be so far behind that they have to resort to the passing game and he gets 10-15 touches a game?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do the Browns even have an offensive line that can open holes for him to run through or will they be so far behind that they have to resort to the passing game and he gets 10-15 touches a game?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: muckfodell</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/26/browns-trade-up-to-the-no-3-overall-pick/#comment-1746910</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[muckfodell]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2012 23:47:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=624327#comment-1746910</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I know the trade value chart is outdated, but the points to make this trade is 400.

The Browns gave up 143. Way under value to move from 4 to 3.

It seemed like the Vikes didn&#039;t want to move to 5 and risk losing their guy, and the Browns had fears that Tampa would ruin their party. So they conpromised.

So as the dust settles, it is truly a good deal for both teams.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know the trade value chart is outdated, but the points to make this trade is 400.</p>
<p>The Browns gave up 143. Way under value to move from 4 to 3.</p>
<p>It seemed like the Vikes didn&#8217;t want to move to 5 and risk losing their guy, and the Browns had fears that Tampa would ruin their party. So they conpromised.</p>
<p>So as the dust settles, it is truly a good deal for both teams.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gb4mn0</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/26/browns-trade-up-to-the-no-3-overall-pick/#comment-1746909</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[gb4mn0]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2012 23:46:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=624327#comment-1746909</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Who cares? The vikequeefs blow!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who cares? The vikequeefs blow!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sandra Lee's Cans</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/26/browns-trade-up-to-the-no-3-overall-pick/#comment-1746907</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sandra Lee's Cans]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2012 23:46:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=624327#comment-1746907</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This was a good move. The Browns absolutely couldn&#039;t risk losing out on Richardson. The Vikes could have really stuck it to them but didn&#039;t. The Browns still have a 4th, 5th and two 7th round picks left and they weren&#039;t going to hit homeruns with the ones they gave up. Good business decision. Look for more moves.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This was a good move. The Browns absolutely couldn&#8217;t risk losing out on Richardson. The Vikes could have really stuck it to them but didn&#8217;t. The Browns still have a 4th, 5th and two 7th round picks left and they weren&#8217;t going to hit homeruns with the ones they gave up. Good business decision. Look for more moves.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: varnbo</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/26/browns-trade-up-to-the-no-3-overall-pick/#comment-1746906</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[varnbo]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2012 23:45:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=624327#comment-1746906</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I’ve been a Browns fan my whole life. It is increasingly hard to root for this team. The browns have more holes than a room full of secret service dates. WTF am I missing on Richardson. He plays a position with the shortest shelf live in the NFL, where history has proven you can find RB talent anywhere, yet they give up draft choices to move up one spot. Stand pat and take the best CB in the draft!

Reminds me of the idiotic move by Butch Davis to trade up 1 spot to draft the chosen one. Thank God for the Buckeyes.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I’ve been a Browns fan my whole life. It is increasingly hard to root for this team. The browns have more holes than a room full of secret service dates. WTF am I missing on Richardson. He plays a position with the shortest shelf live in the NFL, where history has proven you can find RB talent anywhere, yet they give up draft choices to move up one spot. Stand pat and take the best CB in the draft!</p>
<p>Reminds me of the idiotic move by Butch Davis to trade up 1 spot to draft the chosen one. Thank God for the Buckeyes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pateray64</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/26/browns-trade-up-to-the-no-3-overall-pick/#comment-1746901</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[pateray64]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2012 23:44:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=624327#comment-1746901</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Great move Vikes, 3 picks for nothing....

Thank you Browns...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great move Vikes, 3 picks for nothing&#8230;.</p>
<p>Thank you Browns&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: killerron</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/26/browns-trade-up-to-the-no-3-overall-pick/#comment-1746900</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[killerron]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2012 23:44:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=624327#comment-1746900</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Not bad...three lower round picks to cement the back they wanted.  Browns still have 5 of top 100 picks.  Get 3 offensive weapons and two more defenders and this would be a decent draft for Cleveland.

Plus it now makes others want to jump to take the next 3 prospects (Claiborne, Kalil and Blackmon).  Who else will look desperate?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not bad&#8230;three lower round picks to cement the back they wanted.  Browns still have 5 of top 100 picks.  Get 3 offensive weapons and two more defenders and this would be a decent draft for Cleveland.</p>
<p>Plus it now makes others want to jump to take the next 3 prospects (Claiborne, Kalil and Blackmon).  Who else will look desperate?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ravenator</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/26/browns-trade-up-to-the-no-3-overall-pick/#comment-1746899</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ravenator]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2012 23:43:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=624327#comment-1746899</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@7thlombardiontheway

Does it bother you that you were swept last season, Tebow&#039;d out of the playoffs by a backup QB? Turd.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@7thlombardiontheway</p>
<p>Does it bother you that you were swept last season, Tebow&#8217;d out of the playoffs by a backup QB? Turd.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
