Skip to content

Rueben Randle had a first-round grade on the Giants’ board

Rueben Randle AP

When LSU receiver Rueben Randle sat in the green room through the final pick of the second round at the NFL draft, it would have been easy to suggest that the NFL screwed up by inviting Randle to the draft at all: Why was the 63rd player taken one of the 26 players brought to Radio City Music Hall?

But the Giants, who finally drafted Randle, don’t see it that way. They say they had a first-round grade on Randle and considered taking him with the 32nd overall pick.

I really didn’t think there was a chance we were going to get him,” Giants director of college scouting Marc Ross said. “He was one of those where, at the end of the night [Thursday], you said, ‘He’s going to be one of the first few guys taken at the top of the [second] round.’ It’s very surprising that he was still there.”

Ross labeled Randle “an NFL-ready receiver” and expects Randle to contribute to the Giants’ offense as a rookie. Combined with first-round running back David Wilson, the Giants drafted two guys who will make plays with the ball in their hands as rookies.

And the Giants’ draft looks solid from top to bottom: After Wilson and Randle, the picks of Virginia Tech cornerback Jayron Hosley, Cincinnati tight end Adrien Robinson, Auburn tackle Brandon Mosley, Alabama-Birmingham tackle Matt McCants and North Carolina State defensive lineman Markus Kuhn all appear to be good value where they were selected. The best team in the NFL got better over the last three days.

Permalink 68 Comments Feed for comments Latest Stories in: New York Giants, Rumor Mill, Top Stories
68 Responses to “Rueben Randle had a first-round grade on the Giants’ board”
  1. gfan8611 says: Apr 28, 2012 7:19 PM

    This is the year we’ll see just how badly Ramses Barden wants to be a pro football player.

  2. obamablowz says: Apr 28, 2012 7:19 PM

    Riiiiiiigggghhhht…..and every “expert” is saying the QB the Eagles drafted would have been the top QB if not for Luck, or RG3.

  3. patriots55 says: Apr 28, 2012 7:20 PM

    He should of been drafted in the first round

  4. no1draftpick says: Apr 28, 2012 7:26 PM

    Randle can thank Jordan Jefferson for falling that far in the draft!

  5. leroysbutler says: Apr 28, 2012 7:27 PM

    Weren’t the Giants 9-7 last year?

  6. simperfi1 says: Apr 28, 2012 7:28 PM

    A steal as good if not better than Victor Cruz

  7. mhohmann says: Apr 28, 2012 7:34 PM

    I agree.

  8. scrummymustard says: Apr 28, 2012 7:45 PM

    The 9-7 Giants are the best team in the NFL?

    defending champs? yes, best team? ha thats laughable, there is at least 5 teams better.

  9. nyfan63 says: Apr 28, 2012 7:47 PM

    leroysbutler says:Apr 28, 2012 7:27 PM

    Weren’t the Giants 9-7 last year?

    ———————————————————-

    No they weren’t. They were 13-7

  10. wludford says: Apr 28, 2012 7:49 PM

    Best team in the NFL? I think not. Not even close.

  11. zaggs says: Apr 28, 2012 7:51 PM

    “leroysbutler says: Apr 28, 2012 7:27 PM

    Weren’t the Giants 9-7 last year?”

    That was before their 4-0 run!

  12. zaggs says: Apr 28, 2012 7:53 PM

    “scrummymustard says: Apr 28, 2012 7:45 PM

    The 9-7 Giants are the best team in the NFL?

    defending champs? yes, best team? ha thats laughable, there is at least 5 teams better.”

    Hmmm, I don’t remember 4 other team being tied with the Giants as champs. But just for laughs, which 5? Mind you that list can’t include the: 49ers, Packers, or Patriots.

  13. demonspank says: Apr 28, 2012 7:53 PM

    >>The 9-7 Giants are the best team in the NFL?

    >>defending champs? yes, best team? ha thats >>laughable, there is at least 5 teams better.

    I’m a Philly fan – and that quote is one of most empty set of words ever written. These guys proved they are the best. Until they are dethroned, they get to wear this tag.

  14. Mr. Wright 212 says: Apr 28, 2012 7:57 PM

    And the best TEAM — TEAM — won the Super Bowl, not the best record-possessing conglomerate of talent.

  15. manuich1 says: Apr 28, 2012 7:59 PM

    leroysbutler says:
    Apr 28, 2012 7:27 PM
    Weren’t the Giants 9-7 last year?

    —————————————————-

    Correction ass clown they were 13-7 (playoffs and SB included). Its not how you start but how you finish and they finished pretty dam good I might add. Hey but keep hating cause that’s what ass clowns like you are good at. You should learn how to be humble

  16. zaggs says: Apr 28, 2012 7:59 PM

    Even as a Giants fan I gotta think that first round grade had more to do with what they wanted (Nicks clone) than what Randle actually is. Mayock had him in the 60’s on his top 100, CBS had him 34th overall, and NFL.com had him as the 5th ranked receiver.

  17. janvanflac says: Apr 28, 2012 8:17 PM

    “And the best TEAM — TEAM — won the Super Bowl, not the best record-possessing conglomerate of talent.”

    BS. The Giants were twice the luckiest, most improbable, least deserving SB champs ever. Both years they won, they pretty much sucked before going on an unlikely run.

    They shouldn’t have even made the playoffs & the NFCG was absolutely handed to them, and they had the good fortune of playing a team that was distracted by a tragedy in the divisional round.

    It seems like they had a fine draft but they just weren’t that good last year.

  18. 7to10for6allday says: Apr 28, 2012 8:21 PM

    Props to the giants for winning the SB…..but “the best team just got better”. Is BS. Eagles were 5-1 in the division and 9-1 vs the giants in the last 10 meetings. Eagles will win the division this year. And hopefully they get hot at the end when it matters. #bleedgreenforlife

  19. jdandcoke says: Apr 28, 2012 8:25 PM

    The 9-7 Giants are the best team in the NFL?

    defending champs? yes, best team? ha thats laughable, there is at least 5 teams better.

    hey skeeter…..when the giants finally got healthy at the end of the year, who beat them? take a look at all of the injuries they had and you’ll see why they struggled during the regular season….you clown.

  20. rowdymon says: Apr 28, 2012 8:25 PM

    The Browns wanted Randle and as soon as the Giants got him they traded back further to get more picks. Very good receiver.

  21. bigbluenationdb says: Apr 28, 2012 8:50 PM

    Randle is solid value at the end of the second. He suffered in college from not having a qb that could get him the ball. I am a huge SEC football fan and if Randle had a QB that could get him the ball he would have been a first round pick.

  22. kappy32 says: Apr 28, 2012 8:50 PM

    6’3, 215 & a 4.4 40 = 1st round talent. This draft was deep with WRs. If this was any other year, Randle would’ve been a top 15 pick. Also, Randle didn’t have much in the way of a QB in college where he could show off his talents. This was a steal.

    Also, the Giants ARE the best team. They demonstrated that by beating the 4 best teams, record wise, in the NFL during the playoffs. Until someone else hoists up the trophy in February, the Giants are the best team in the NFL.

  23. Mr. Wright 212 says: Apr 28, 2012 8:58 PM

    janvanflac says: Apr 28, 2012 8:17 PM

    “And the best TEAM — TEAM — won the Super Bowl, not the best record-possessing conglomerate of talent.”

    BS. The Giants were twice the luckiest, most improbable, least deserving SB champs ever. Both years they won, they pretty much sucked before going on an unlikely run.

    They shouldn’t have even made the playoffs & the NFCG was absolutely handed to them, and they had the good fortune of playing a team that was distracted by a tragedy in the divisional round.

    It seems like they had a fine draft but they just weren’t that good last year.
    ——–

    Don’t you idiots ever get tired of the “luck” angle WHENEVER the Giants win something? There ain’t that much luck in the world or else the Patriots would have won the last three matchups with the Giants, or more importantly — NOT GOTTEN CAUGHT CHEATING.

  24. gcsuk says: Apr 28, 2012 9:00 PM

    janvanflac says:

    “BS. The Giants were twice the luckiest, most improbable, least deserving SB champs ever. Both years they won, they pretty much sucked before going on an unlikely run.”

    Exactly – SB CHAMPS. That means that whatever team YOU root for did not win. Hence the petty jealousy.

    “They shouldn’t have even made the playoffs & the NFCG was absolutely handed to them, and they had the good fortune of playing a team that was distracted by a tragedy in the divisional round.”

    Unfortunately for you, they DID make the playoffs (by BEATING the Cowboys twice and the Jets). I’m sure they were just thanking their lucky stars that Joe Philbins son picked that week to die. How “fortunate”. What an absolutely SCUMBAG statement on your part.

    “It seems like they had a fine draft but they just weren’t that good last year.”

    Hopefully for you, whatever team you root for can suck as bad as the Giants next year. Then you won’t have to exude such petty jealousy.

  25. gcsuk says: Apr 28, 2012 9:04 PM

    7to10for6allday says:
    Apr 28, 2012 8:21 PM
    Props to the giants for winning the SB…..but “the best team just got better”. Is BS. Eagles were 5-1 in the division and 9-1 vs the giants in the last 10 meetings. Eagles will win the division this year. And hopefully they get hot at the end when it matters. #bleedgreenforlife
    ———————————————————-

    Keep hanging on to those regular season wins, Philly fans. Brag all you want (just like Skins fans) how you beat the SB CHAMPIONS. Must suck as a fan not having any SB Trophies to look at.

    Just glad I don’t have to root for human garbage like Michael Vick.

  26. 6ball says: Apr 28, 2012 9:07 PM

    .

    1. Jerry Reese is underrated as a GM.

    2. As a patriots follower, I watched the super bowl. The giants won fair and square.

    .

    .

  27. 1bigbluefan says: Apr 28, 2012 9:16 PM

    7to10for6allday says:

    Eagles were 5-1 in the division and 9-1 vs the giants in the last 10 meetings.

    So the 8-8 Eagles who lost to the Giants are better than the Giants? Good lord you people are idiots.

  28. rajuncajun28 says: Apr 28, 2012 9:23 PM

    The GNATS were the luckiest team in the NFL last year…Saints would have torched them in the dome…too bad we could not finish the game against the gayniners……this is our year…scandal means nothing…sorry haters, you will be sadly disappointed….FACT!

  29. janvanflac says: Apr 28, 2012 9:34 PM

    damn right I’m bitter. Boring, plodding 9-7 teams should not win Super Bowls.

  30. greymares says: Apr 28, 2012 9:51 PM

    gesuk !!!!!!!!! any fan of a team that contained the likes of a Lawrence Taylor cant possibly call another teams player “HUMAN GARBAGE”

  31. weaponx73 says: Apr 28, 2012 9:57 PM

    Well Im sure the history books will proudly tell the tale of the saints the team that almost won the super bowl. When do they hand out the one and done in the play off rings? Must really hurt to lose to a team with a QB that is a good back up at best.

  32. gpete1962 says: Apr 28, 2012 10:05 PM

    7to10for6allday says: Apr 28, 2012 8:21 PM

    Props to the giants for winning the SB…..but “the best team just got better”. Is BS. Eagles were 5-1 in the division and 9-1 vs the giants in the last 10 meetings. Eagles will win the division this year. And hopefully they get hot at the end when it matters. #bleedgreenforlife

    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

    Your right about the eagles owning the giants. They do have more explosive talent but their problem is that they have no depth and that’s where the Giants are better.

  33. nfl fan says: Apr 28, 2012 10:05 PM

    7to10for6allday says:
    Apr 28, 2012 8:21 PM
    Props to the giants for winning the SB…..but “the best team just got better”. Is BS. Eagles were 5-1 in the division and 9-1 vs the giants in the last 10 meetings. Eagles will win the division this year. And hopefully they get hot at the end when it matters. #bleedgreenforlife
    ———————————————————-
    We hear this every year, but it NEVER happens. Eagles are what, 0 for 52 years…in a row? Have a little class and maybe your luck will change. I can’t imagine what’s it like to have 3 generations never see their team win a SuperBowl…but don’t worry, this is your year!

  34. tuckfanforlife says: Apr 28, 2012 10:11 PM

    name 5 better teams than ny when they were healthy, i ot 3 teams gb,sf,no.

    gmen were better than everyone else.

    eales owns the giants, thats doesn’t make them the better team.

  35. nfl fan says: Apr 28, 2012 10:16 PM

    rajuncajun28 says:
    Apr 28, 2012 9:23 PM
    The GNATS were the luckiest team in the NFL last year…Saints would have torched them in the dome.
    —————————————————–
    and we know you’ll be watching the World Champion New York Giants kick off the NFL Season Sept. 5th at home. Enjoy!

  36. eepobee says: Apr 28, 2012 10:29 PM

    giants were the best team in the nfl last year? that’s a good one! i guess the makes the saints, who beat the bologna out of giants the supreme rulers of the nfl? let’s get something straight: winning the super bowl makes you super bowl winners, not the best team. just like the cardinals were world series winner, not the best team in the majors. the giants were 9-7 and just made the playoffs. i’d say we can safely rank them in the top half of teams in the nfl (between 10 – 16), but not in the top quarter. the pats, niners, steelers, packers, saints, ravens, texans, and lions were and are all cleary better.

  37. kirkbelmont11 says: Apr 28, 2012 10:45 PM

    Well… this is pointless gloating on my part…but the best team in the NFL lost twice to the REDSKINS hahaha

  38. dal24la says: Apr 28, 2012 10:53 PM

    He had first round grade yet they waited till the bottom of the 2nd to draft him…
    Also I would have took him over Wilson (the RB)

  39. manuich1 says: Apr 28, 2012 10:54 PM

    I don’t even know how to respond to the above statement, i gires just hand the trophy out at the end of the regular season than. No brainer. U dumazz!!!!!

  40. vtdcfan says: Apr 28, 2012 11:05 PM

    as the name states I’m a hokies fan as well as a skins fan, I hate to admit it, but the gmen had an excellent top half of the draft. some of the later picks need to be proven as with all teams but staying at home with the last pick of a few rounds seemed to yield some great picks. gotta give credit where its due… that being said I still hope we can beat em twice a year… HTTR!

  41. 44kyle says: Apr 28, 2012 11:37 PM

    Seems like a lot of you guys think “best team” means ‘best fantasy players’ or ‘highest rated players’ or ‘best highlight film team’.

    The game is played ON THE FIELD.

    The ONLY thing that decides BEST TEAM is the Super Bowl. FINAL SCORE ONLY! Opinions about “luck”, cudda, wudda and shudda are for the 31 losers.

  42. gcsuk says: Apr 28, 2012 11:38 PM

    eepobee says:
    Apr 28, 2012 10:29 PM

    the pats, niners, steelers, packers, saints, ravens, texans, and lions were and are all cleary better.
    ———————————————————-

    Then why didn’t the Pats, Packers, or Niners beat the Giants last year WHEN IT MATTERED?

    Suck it up, pal. If you aren’t a Giants fan, then your team lost last year. There are plenty of years that the Giants cannot say they are the defending champs, the best team in the NFL. This year is NOT that year!

  43. msand13 says: Apr 28, 2012 11:43 PM

    As an LSU alumnus, I’ve watched Randle closely over the past few years. Poor quarterback play killed his stock. Randle’s the best WR to come out of LSU since Dwayne Bowe. He’s probably better than Brandon LaFell or Early Doucet right now.

    Nice pick, Giants. I was hoping he’d fall to the Saints.

  44. bigbluecrew420 says: Apr 28, 2012 11:49 PM

    With all this banter about what team is the best, I wish that there was a way that the teams could play each other in a way that is structured so that every team a had a reasonable amount of games to play, let’s say 16, After said games were played the best 12 teams could play in a playoff where the winners move on and the losers go home.
    The last team standing would be the BEST TEAM IN THE NFL

    If they did that than MAYBE there would some closure on the case….

    Until then I guess we will never really know…

    PS
    The Giants played NO NE SF GB NYJ in the regular season. Not including Philly and Dallas twice

    PPS

    All the hate makes WINNING THE SB soo much sweeter 

  45. msand13 says: Apr 28, 2012 11:52 PM

    Arguing about the “best team” of last year is ridiculous. There was no one dominant team last year. The NFL is about matchups. I definitely believe the Saints would have beaten the Giants handily had they gotten the chance. It was a bad matchup for the Giants (as was apparent when the teams played). But, the Saints couldn’t get past the 49ers. That’s how it works in the playoffs. Anyone that thinks playoff systems crown the “best team” is fooling themselves. In the NFL, anyone can beat anyone else on a given day.

    You can’t win a Super Bowl without a little luck. The Giants won, and they should be celebrated for doing so.

  46. victorycruz says: Apr 29, 2012 12:09 AM

    Honestly, did anyone see the QB’s Randall had to deal with at LSU? Average is an over-statement. Now you have a legitimate elite qb in Eli, with a superior coaching staff that will give this guy ample oppertunity to prove his worth. This guy is no Sinorice Moss, I can tell you that for sure, and this guy played against the best conferance in college football (SEC). The highlights he does have shows a lot of potential, so before anyone can give a true draft grade on any team this year, you will have to wait atleast until 2015. From what I see though, good job G-Men… we addressed all the needs I was concerned about

  47. hikohadon says: Apr 29, 2012 12:30 AM

    Every team claims that every player they pick in every round had a 1st round grade.

  48. lennydpocketqb says: Apr 29, 2012 12:31 AM

    Can the Giants only play in the playoffs? It would be a lot better on my nervous system.

    Regardless of if you holes believe they are the best or worst team around, they are the champs. Recognize.

  49. prplpuzzetrz says: Apr 29, 2012 12:59 AM

    How can anyone Argue that any team other than the Giants are the best team in the League????! It makes no sense!!!
    I don’t care If your team beat them 2x in the regular season, they are the Champs!!!!! Coming from a Viking fan, who dislikes them, they are a killer team with great coaching, awesome receivers & a clutch Qb!
    Any argument that your team is better is embarrassing

  50. distracted9 says: Apr 29, 2012 2:37 AM

    I find it hard to believe the best team in the nfl would have to embarrass themselves by laying down and faking injuries.. or get caught up in a little bounty scandal themselves. The ball seemed to bounce in their favor more than once to allow them to back into the playoffs.. Cowboys had them beat but missed a fg.. Vick got knocked out on a late hit in a game philly was winning… so Yah Giants you got a lot of luck.

  51. discosucs2005 says: Apr 29, 2012 4:46 AM

    I think the real story here is that, despite all that we hear and read about draft coverage, NFL teams have their own ideas of how good players are and who they are going to draft.

  52. mega2184 says: Apr 29, 2012 6:05 AM

    is he related to john randle????? hmmmm??

  53. bbk1000 says: Apr 29, 2012 6:34 AM

    7to10for6allday says:Apr 28, 2012 8:21 PM

    Props to the giants for winning the SB…..but “the best team just got better”. Is BS. Eagles were 5-1 in the division and 9-1 vs the giants in the last 10 meetings. Eagles will win the division this year. And hopefully they get hot at the end when it matters. #bleedgreenforlife

    Whatever, people said the same thing last year, exactly how many SB’s have the Eagles won?

    What’s that I hear, crickets? Yes it’s crickets…chirp…..chirp………

  54. bluefan204 says: Apr 29, 2012 6:46 AM

    Lucky, undeserving, fluke, the other team was distracted, the sun wasn’t quite lined up right, the RT was constipated that day…

    What does it all mean?

    It means that there are still a whole lot of bitter losers out there who are still crying themselves to sleep over a game that took place close to 3 months ago. Giants are the Champs. Your team is beneath them. Choke on it.

  55. bospat says: Apr 29, 2012 6:59 AM

    Luckiest that’s for sure…seriously they are Champs until they are beaten…

  56. istallion says: Apr 29, 2012 7:21 AM

    It’s all about peaking for the playoffs fellows. The 9-7 record is irrelevant. The point is, that was good enough to get invited to the dance.
    Ask Atl, GB, SF, and New Eng who was the best team last year.

  57. istallion says: Apr 29, 2012 7:39 AM

    Many fans here are forgetting one reason the Gmen were only 9-7 during the season was because of many injuries to key players- TThomas, Prince, Goff, Hixon, Osi, Tuck, and others not as big named. When you lose this many guys, naturally you are going to be disadvantaged. Fortunately, we were able to win enough and got many of them back at the end. Let’s face it, luck (injuries) plays a part too.
    Best wishes to all this coming year. Repeating ain’t easy but I’m satisfied enough having won 2 in 5 years. That satisfaction will last at least 4 more years too.

  58. 1bigbluefan says: Apr 29, 2012 7:48 AM

    Yep, the Giants got Lucky by having JPP BLOCK that field goal against Dallas and by having their players KNOCK Vick out of the game.

    Perhaps you are confusing the word “luck” with “playing.”

    I spent years watching the Eagles and Randall Cunningham get lucky against the Giants (Down at the 5 yard line anyone? Carl Banks Doesn’t wrap RC up?) so don’t cry about being lucky. The Eagles had their chances and couldn’t manage to capitalize.

    The Giants have a better D-Line, Better Receivers and, of course, a better QB than the Eagles. Maybe that changes this year, but it was clearly true this year.

  59. nygsbchamps4 says: Apr 29, 2012 8:12 AM

    Another great draft by the great Jerry Reese and co. I fully expect for these guys to be impact players next year. Take notes everyone, this is how you run a football team. Let’s go Giants!

  60. deathtoromo says: Apr 29, 2012 8:36 AM

    What a crock , ” we had a first round grade on him “. But he wasn’t taken in first round. He is what he is.

  61. distracted9 says: Apr 29, 2012 11:25 AM

    sorry… Giants are an embarrassment to the nfl.. Skip around with your trophy like you earned it but fact is all you have is a d line. O can point out 5 instances of pure dumb luck that handed you the lombardi… don’t call it getting healthy, when your players say they were told 49ers punt returner has had 4 concussions and go for his head. Really? What a classless organization. If ya can’t beat m… have a bench warmer knock m out. No such thing as a late hit. lol.. Yah, you’re the gold standard.

  62. damnyankee13 says: Apr 29, 2012 12:09 PM

    Hi folks> I’ve b een brought up to believe that the BEST teram in the NFL wins the super bowl. . So, the Giants won it and we are not the best?
    Beat us.

  63. bigbluecrew420 says: Apr 29, 2012 12:55 PM

    @distracted9
    Aka
    Disgruntled9

    Blah blah blah

    Why dont u go tell it to a shrink we don’t want to hear about your whining. Nobody like a big crybaby. 

    All they have is a D-Line? How bout Eli Manning?
    Here is part of his resume…

    2× Pro Bowl (2008, 2011)
    2× Super Bowl champion (XLII, XLVI)
    2× Super Bowl MVP (XLII, XLVI)
    2× NFC Champion (2007, 2011)
    NFL Record most 4th quarter touchdown passes in a season (15)
    Tied NFL Record longest pass completion and touchdown (99 yards)
    NFL Record most road playoff wins by a quarterback (5)
    Tied NFL Record most game-winning drives in a season (8)
    Most road wins in a single regular season and postseason by a starting quarterback (10)
    Most passing yards in a single postseason (1219 yards)
    Cotton Bowl Classic MVP (2004)

    Luck can win u a game. Luck can’t win u a championship.

  64. bigbluecrew420 says: Apr 29, 2012 12:59 PM

    Also I’m trying to remember when did the giants knock out that little butterfinger Williams? Your Whining about something that never happened 

    If the gut had 4 concussions whys he ob the field? Blame your coaches bud!

  65. waaaaaaaaaaaaa says: Apr 29, 2012 6:35 PM

    So I guess because the Rams beat the Saints in week 8 they must be the better team.

    Moron. Being the best in the NFL isn’t about winning in the regular season. It’s about having the most depth/talent and being able to manage the ebbs and flows of a 22 week season. Every team has problems matching up to at least one other team. Being the best is about having the best depth/talent/and gameplan to be able to have the best matchups against the most teams.

    So the Saints beat the Giants in week 12. BFD. That doesn’t make them the best team. That’s the same line of thinking that suggests the Broncos must have been the best in the NFL in 2009 because they started off 6-0.

    Every team in the league knows the schedule going into the season. They know they have 16 regular season games to make the playoffs. They know they have to win 3 or 4 games to win the Super Bowl. They build their teams accordingly.

    Sometimes in the regular season teams play differently than in the playoffs when it’s d0-or-die. They rest players who are questionable with injuries when they otherwise wouldn’t if their season was on the line in the playoffs. Sometimes teams and players start off hot and then cool down noticeable by the end of the year because teams learn how to gameplan against them after watching the tape. That’s part of the game and every player/team knows it.

    So quit your whining about the Giants being lucky or not really being the best team, and just sit back and choke on the fact that they’ve been the best team of the last quarter century (4 Super Bowl wins in the last 25 years – more than any other franchise)

    Boom!

  66. n0hopeleft says: Apr 30, 2012 10:17 AM

    janvanflac says:
    Apr 28, 2012 8:17 PM
    “And the best TEAM — TEAM — won the Super Bowl, not the best record-possessing conglomerate of talent.”

    BS. The Giants were twice the luckiest, most improbable, least deserving SB champs ever. Both years they won, they pretty much sucked before going on an unlikely run.

    They shouldn’t have even made the playoffs & the NFCG was absolutely handed to them, and they had the good fortune of playing a team that was distracted by a tragedy in the divisional round.

    It seems like they had a fine draft but they just weren’t that good last year.

    ___________________________________

    You sound like such a little bitch.

  67. n0hopeleft says: Apr 30, 2012 10:37 AM

    The Giants faced multiple playoff teams during the regular season – and they lost.
    (SF, NO, GB)

    So if a team goes 13-3, but doesn’t face any quality teams, that makes them more deserving to be in the playoffs, or more deserving to be the champion?

    Instead, the Giants came back from loses during the season, to win when it mattered.

    They deserve to be standing on top of the podium just as much as any other team.

    Somebody get the DBAG above a tampon and some Summer’s Eve. It wouldn’t surprise me one bit if you were the kid who got your arse kicked in every single sport you played in your entire life – then made excuses as to why you suck.

    Even your mother knows you’re soft.

  68. sayuncleplaya357 says: May 1, 2012 7:12 AM

    First thing first haters! Why all dis praise fo saints when they clearly been cheatin? Low class organization ! They even would a loss to da giants! Da best team won when it was time to play they were on da field ready fo war! They beat da so called best team patriots 3 times back to back twice when it mattered most! They beat da niners ! Greenbay they beat! Who else they gotta beat da all madden team! Y’all haters is straight dum asses! Eli is da best qb period he outplays everybody when it matters most giants as a team r da best look at they stats b4 opening ur mouth!

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to leave a comment. Not a member? Register now!