Skip to content

Foxworth, Kessler make case to players, agents on CBA gains

gty_find_money_mw_110609_wg Getty Images

The NFLPA recently produced a two-page assessment for players entitled “The Economic Truth About The New NFL CBA.”

On Monday, in separate letters to all players and NFLPA-certified agents, NFLPA president Domonique Foxworth and outside counsel Jeffrey Kessler went into more detail regarding the gains made by players in the new labor deal.

Foxworth’s letter repeats the same bullet points from the two-page document, along with a fourth entry:  “Elimination of two-days and reduced hitting in practices have provided an immediate benefit to players.”

Also citing the higher Injury Protection Benefit and improved medical standard, Foxworth writes that “the new CBA was something that was worth fighting for.”

Kessler’s letter is far more detailed, outlining nine arguments aimed at countering “anti-player critics” who have made “grossly inaccurate” claims that “demonstrate a fundamental misunderstanding” of the current CBA and its predecessor.

His points are accurate, even though some of the issues weren’t ever the subject of serious criticism.  For example, Kessler claims that critics believe the current deal is unfair because it reduced the players’ share from “‘nearly 60%’ to an average of 47% during the course of the deal.”  Though we’re aware of no critics who have made that contention, Kessler’s response is accurate.  The prior percentage was applied after the NFL received $1 billion off the top in cost deductions.  The new percentage is much, much closer to a per-dollar formula.

Kessler also points out that the new CBA has minimum cash spending requirements.  Though he doesn’t mention that the per-team minimum of 89 percent doesn’t apply until 2013, he accurately points out that the league-wide minimum is 99 percent in 2011 and 2012, dropping to 95 percent in future years.

Kessler also touts the increase in guaranteed compensation, addresses the belief in some circles that the 55-percent share that goes to the players on national TV and media deal is nevertheless limited by a 47-percent share on all revenue, defends the rookie wage scale, explains that the NFLPA did not surrender group licensing rights to the NFL, and emphasizes the non-economic benefits of the new CBA (such as limited practices, the new Injury Protection Benefit, and other achievements).

Finally, Kessler tackles the contention from a “select number of ‘journalists’” that “the new CBA is not much better than the proposal the owners made to the players in March of 2011,” calling that claim “uninformed and wrong.”  He points out that the proposal offered a fixed cap with no upside, along with dramatically reduced TV revenues as of 2014, and that the March 2011 proposal lacked other key player-friendly terms that appeared in the final deal.

Kessler’s letter represents the first detailed effort to respond to criticism of the CBA, but at no point does he or Foxworth address the comments from owners like Robert Kraft that, under the current labor deal, the salary cap won’t increase significantly for the foreseeable future.  The comparisons by “journalists” like Daniel Kaplan of SportsBusiness Journal and Greg Bedard of the Boston Globe (and, yes, me) of the final CBA to the March 2011 proposal arose directly from projections and calculations regarding the cap dollars under the final deal in comparison to the guaranteed cap dollars under the March 2011 proposal.  Until the claims from influential owners like Kraft and Bob McNair are addressed, Kessler’s letter can’t be regarded as complete, no matter how thorough it may otherwise appear to be.

Permalink 11 Comments Feed for comments Latest Stories in: Rumor Mill, Top Stories
11 Responses to “Foxworth, Kessler make case to players, agents on CBA gains”
  1. harbaughshandshake says: May 21, 2012 9:11 PM

    Blah blah blah blah………

  2. gweez76 says: May 21, 2012 9:12 PM

    When they signed the agreement I heard Mara tell Goodell he was a “good dog” and even gave him a milk bone.

  3. azblackbird says: May 21, 2012 9:30 PM

    And we care about this because …?

  4. hobokenbill says: May 21, 2012 9:31 PM

    Kessler’s letterhead is interesting. Couldn’t keep his old law firm Dewey LeBouef together, leaves them for his new firm and now he wants us to believe his arguments? It’s not a good deal when the lawyer earns more in yearly salary than approximately 91% of the players.

  5. mrf47 says: May 21, 2012 9:41 PM

    I don’t think the NFL players should be taking business advice from Kessler; his lawfirm just went bankrupt…

  6. davidm1886 says: May 21, 2012 10:20 PM

    The players union gave up some short term gains based on the belief the new tv deals will give massive gains….plus added gains in guarantees….the owners still won but they had more leverage….but no common man should feel bad for the players as they are doing well

  7. jagsfanugh says: May 21, 2012 10:26 PM

    Huh?

  8. ksm31311 says: May 21, 2012 11:28 PM

    And Goodell is still judge, jury, appeals court and executioner…

  9. Adam Tabaka says: May 21, 2012 11:32 PM

    davidm1886 says:
    May 21, 2012 10:20 PM
    The players union gave up some short term gains based on the belief the new tv deals will give massive gains….

    *********************************************

    And DirecTV just cut the price of Sunday Ticket to $199. That’s a reduction of several hundred million dollars that won’t be fully recouped by additional subscribership.

  10. majbobby says: May 22, 2012 7:46 AM

    Two words: Damage Control.

  11. wussbasket says: May 22, 2012 9:04 AM

    kesslers previous lawfirm is bankrupt and kessler was the lawyer that was kicked out of the CBA negotiations because he was doing nothing but causing problems and stirring the pot.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to leave a comment. Not a member? Register now!