<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Numbers don&#8217;t support Alex Smith&#8217;s claims about Cam Newton</title>
	<atom:link href="http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/05/28/numbers-dont-support-alex-smiths-claims-about-cam-newton/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/05/28/numbers-dont-support-alex-smiths-claims-about-cam-newton/</link>
	<description>ProFootballTalk on NBCSports.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 21:05:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: fsf7</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/05/28/numbers-dont-support-alex-smiths-claims-about-cam-newton/#comment-1817608</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[fsf7]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jun 2012 17:20:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=782249#comment-1817608</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[rickdawg52 says:May 28, 2012 5:38 PM 

when the steelers won the Super Bowl in 05, Big Ben threw for 2,300 yds and 17 TDs….so i said Mr. Smith is dead on
---------------
Ben missed 4 regular season games to injury and had 803 yards, 7 TDs (+2 rushing), 3 INTs.  B.R. was huge in the 2005 playoffs.
----------------------
ninergold says:May 28, 2012 3:56 PM 

Hey America how about these numbers San Francisco 5 Super Bowl wins! carolina panthers absolute zero super bowl wins!
---------------------
This is relevant to Newton vs. Smith in what way?
---------------------------------
 jibanez0810 says:May 28, 2012 2:32 PM
 “At the end of the day the only numbers that matter are wins. Ask Dan Marino.”

What was the biggest difference between Marino and Elway?

When Mike Shanahan and Jimmy Johnson took over the Broncos and Dolphins in 95/96 respectively - Elway bought 100% into Shanahan&#039;s philosophy of an offense that saw the run being used to set up the pass.  Marino fought Johnson on it (despite the success Aikman had with it).  It&#039;s not about statistics, it&#039;s about efficiency and making plays when called on.
 
------------------------------------------------------
axespray says:May 29, 2012 6:53 AM

Dan Marino won a lot of games buddy… just happened to be on a lot of teams that weren’t anywhere near as loaded as the 2011 49ers or the ’70s steelers.
 
If Alex Smith &amp; Terry Bradshaw played on some of those Dolphin’s teams, they’re out of the league faster than Brian Brohm.

Don&#039;t kid yourself.  Bradshaw played in a completely different era with a completely different set of rules.   But Bradshaw was the difference in winning 3 Super Bowls - particular in 78 and 79 when the Steelers Defense was beaten in the SB and Franco couldn&#039;t run - Bradshaw stepped it up then.  Marino played on some great Dolphins teams (reaching 3 AFCCGs) but he was very stubborn, refusing to run the ball.  In the end, that is what kept Miami behind Buffalo and Marino from a ring.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>rickdawg52 says:May 28, 2012 5:38 PM </p>
<p>when the steelers won the Super Bowl in 05, Big Ben threw for 2,300 yds and 17 TDs….so i said Mr. Smith is dead on<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;<br />
Ben missed 4 regular season games to injury and had 803 yards, 7 TDs (+2 rushing), 3 INTs.  B.R. was huge in the 2005 playoffs.<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-<br />
ninergold says:May 28, 2012 3:56 PM </p>
<p>Hey America how about these numbers San Francisco 5 Super Bowl wins! carolina panthers absolute zero super bowl wins!<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;<br />
This is relevant to Newton vs. Smith in what way?<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;<br />
 jibanez0810 says:May 28, 2012 2:32 PM<br />
 “At the end of the day the only numbers that matter are wins. Ask Dan Marino.”</p>
<p>What was the biggest difference between Marino and Elway?</p>
<p>When Mike Shanahan and Jimmy Johnson took over the Broncos and Dolphins in 95/96 respectively &#8211; Elway bought 100% into Shanahan&#8217;s philosophy of an offense that saw the run being used to set up the pass.  Marino fought Johnson on it (despite the success Aikman had with it).  It&#8217;s not about statistics, it&#8217;s about efficiency and making plays when called on.</p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;<br />
axespray says:May 29, 2012 6:53 AM</p>
<p>Dan Marino won a lot of games buddy… just happened to be on a lot of teams that weren’t anywhere near as loaded as the 2011 49ers or the ’70s steelers.</p>
<p>If Alex Smith &amp; Terry Bradshaw played on some of those Dolphin’s teams, they’re out of the league faster than Brian Brohm.</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t kid yourself.  Bradshaw played in a completely different era with a completely different set of rules.   But Bradshaw was the difference in winning 3 Super Bowls &#8211; particular in 78 and 79 when the Steelers Defense was beaten in the SB and Franco couldn&#8217;t run &#8211; Bradshaw stepped it up then.  Marino played on some great Dolphins teams (reaching 3 AFCCGs) but he was very stubborn, refusing to run the ball.  In the end, that is what kept Miami behind Buffalo and Marino from a ring.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: benchwarmer69</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/05/28/numbers-dont-support-alex-smiths-claims-about-cam-newton/#comment-1815326</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[benchwarmer69]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Jun 2012 19:48:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=782249#comment-1815326</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Cam is a selfish egomaniac. And as pitiful as Alex&#039;s career has been, he&#039;s right about this. 

Same thing with the Bucs too, they received a TON of prevent towards the end of games, which in turn, allowed them to throw under all day, thus, boosting Freeman&#039;s stats a bit.

There is an ebb and flow to the game. Some guys like Vick and Cam will never understand the idea that it&#039;s a team sport.

It&#039;s also why guys like Dilfer (of all people) have a superbowl ring. It&#039;s also why P.Manning (for all his worth) will never be as good as his brother after it&#039;s all said and done. And it&#039;s also why Alex did well last season.

There are other people out there that can help the QB. It&#039;s not all about him.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cam is a selfish egomaniac. And as pitiful as Alex&#8217;s career has been, he&#8217;s right about this. </p>
<p>Same thing with the Bucs too, they received a TON of prevent towards the end of games, which in turn, allowed them to throw under all day, thus, boosting Freeman&#8217;s stats a bit.</p>
<p>There is an ebb and flow to the game. Some guys like Vick and Cam will never understand the idea that it&#8217;s a team sport.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s also why guys like Dilfer (of all people) have a superbowl ring. It&#8217;s also why P.Manning (for all his worth) will never be as good as his brother after it&#8217;s all said and done. And it&#8217;s also why Alex did well last season.</p>
<p>There are other people out there that can help the QB. It&#8217;s not all about him.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: birwin2537</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/05/28/numbers-dont-support-alex-smiths-claims-about-cam-newton/#comment-1810644</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[birwin2537]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2012 01:26:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=782249#comment-1810644</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[That&#039;s why the 49ers considered picking up Peyton Manning, but the Panhers are happy with Cam, right?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s why the 49ers considered picking up Peyton Manning, but the Panhers are happy with Cam, right?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nochiefsonlyindians</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/05/28/numbers-dont-support-alex-smiths-claims-about-cam-newton/#comment-1808946</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[nochiefsonlyindians]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2012 07:22:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=782249#comment-1808946</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[At least most of us have a clue about the context of Smitty&#039;s statements....

Alex haters..... Alex Smith is a better QB than ALL of you. So until you beat him in a real football game, go back to waxing your own genitalia. Don&#039;t let some feeble reply dribble off of your lip. Show some proof with pictures and video... proof you are better.... 

(crickets...chirp... chirp...)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At least most of us have a clue about the context of Smitty&#8217;s statements&#8230;.</p>
<p>Alex haters&#8230;.. Alex Smith is a better QB than ALL of you. So until you beat him in a real football game, go back to waxing your own genitalia. Don&#8217;t let some feeble reply dribble off of your lip. Show some proof with pictures and video&#8230; proof you are better&#8230;. </p>
<p>(crickets&#8230;chirp&#8230; chirp&#8230;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: regulator01</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/05/28/numbers-dont-support-alex-smiths-claims-about-cam-newton/#comment-1807857</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[regulator01]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 May 2012 19:05:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=782249#comment-1807857</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[alot has been made about the panthers won lost record as it relate to cams stats. jon beason is more important to panthers number of wins than cam is,beason gives the defense a nasty streak, he went down in week one the d never found a leader to replace him]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>alot has been made about the panthers won lost record as it relate to cams stats. jon beason is more important to panthers number of wins than cam is,beason gives the defense a nasty streak, he went down in week one the d never found a leader to replace him</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stealthjunk</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/05/28/numbers-dont-support-alex-smiths-claims-about-cam-newton/#comment-1807752</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[stealthjunk]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 May 2012 18:23:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=782249#comment-1807752</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Who cares how many yards Newton threw for when his team was behind &quot;between nine and 16 points&quot;?  Why the heck was 9-16 points chosen as the relevant statistic?  That&#039;s just number manipulation at its finest right there.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who cares how many yards Newton threw for when his team was behind &#8220;between nine and 16 points&#8221;?  Why the heck was 9-16 points chosen as the relevant statistic?  That&#8217;s just number manipulation at its finest right there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: whatswiththehate</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/05/28/numbers-dont-support-alex-smiths-claims-about-cam-newton/#comment-1807718</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[whatswiththehate]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 May 2012 18:09:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=782249#comment-1807718</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Not only is the sports media making way to much out of this Alex and Cam story but even worst is when Skip Bayless desparately tries to find some way of comparing Cam to Tim Tebow. I will officially say that our media have jumped the shark as far as objective and fair journalism when it comes to what they feed us.

Tim showing up 5 minutes before the end of a game and gets the praise for every win, isn&#039;t the same as a young rookie carrying his team without any OTA or pre-season work-out for 55 minutes. 

Cam exerts his energy for 55 minutes to help his team as much as he can. Tim over-exerts his defense and offense so they can keep down the score until he feels like showing up 5 minutes before the end of the game.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not only is the sports media making way to much out of this Alex and Cam story but even worst is when Skip Bayless desparately tries to find some way of comparing Cam to Tim Tebow. I will officially say that our media have jumped the shark as far as objective and fair journalism when it comes to what they feed us.</p>
<p>Tim showing up 5 minutes before the end of a game and gets the praise for every win, isn&#8217;t the same as a young rookie carrying his team without any OTA or pre-season work-out for 55 minutes. </p>
<p>Cam exerts his energy for 55 minutes to help his team as much as he can. Tim over-exerts his defense and offense so they can keep down the score until he feels like showing up 5 minutes before the end of the game.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: inallsincerity</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/05/28/numbers-dont-support-alex-smiths-claims-about-cam-newton/#comment-1807548</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[inallsincerity]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 May 2012 17:10:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=782249#comment-1807548</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Alex should compare his second season (first as a starter) to Cam&#039;s rookie year. Numbers don&#039;t lie...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alex should compare his second season (first as a starter) to Cam&#8217;s rookie year. Numbers don&#8217;t lie&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mrseaballs</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/05/28/numbers-dont-support-alex-smiths-claims-about-cam-newton/#comment-1807332</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[mrseaballs]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 May 2012 14:50:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=782249#comment-1807332</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I don&#039;t think Smith was trying to insult anybody at all. It&#039;s to bad players at that level need to be so careful when they speak. But they do. There&#039;s a media person sneaking around trying to catch you saying something they can twist 24/7.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think Smith was trying to insult anybody at all. It&#8217;s to bad players at that level need to be so careful when they speak. But they do. There&#8217;s a media person sneaking around trying to catch you saying something they can twist 24/7.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: briank1ne</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/05/28/numbers-dont-support-alex-smiths-claims-about-cam-newton/#comment-1807249</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[briank1ne]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 May 2012 13:49:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=782249#comment-1807249</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I see Alex smith throwing for less yardage than Aaron rodgers in week 1 and still winning the game. Just sayin...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I see Alex smith throwing for less yardage than Aaron rodgers in week 1 and still winning the game. Just sayin&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: a9erfaithful</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/05/28/numbers-dont-support-alex-smiths-claims-about-cam-newton/#comment-1807198</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[a9erfaithful]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 May 2012 13:00:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=782249#comment-1807198</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The problem with the majority of these comments that express vitriol for Alex is that they miss the whole point. The point is, passing yards (and passing touchdowns) have a strong inverse relationship with the quality of your team&#039;s defense and ST. Beason, and not Newton, SHOULD be the one to take offense to Alex&#039;s comment. With the exception of N.O. and the classless way in which they run up the score, last year&#039;s passing stats were a direct result of defensive play. Sure some of those prolific passers had gaudy stats, but the stats reflect a need as much as a ability. Whether its playing from behind, trying to keep up, or playing to stay ahead, it&#039;s all on the defense. The Niners had a monster D last year and a ST squad that was equally monstrous. They had the best starting field position last year and a game plan that called for controlling the tempo of the game, which correlated to the 2nd lowest pass attempts in the league. What I&#039;m getting at is exactly what Alex was getting at, stats are not a perfect reflector of the effectiveness or the value of a QB. And if it comes down to choosing between W&#039;s and stats, Alex and I would choose W&#039;s every time. Alex did not suggest that he is a better QB than Cam as the article and most commenters are suggesting, only that the systems and situations called for different styles of QBing. But it sure does make for overblown journalism and good reason for chest thumbing by super fans to pretend that he did make those claims...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The problem with the majority of these comments that express vitriol for Alex is that they miss the whole point. The point is, passing yards (and passing touchdowns) have a strong inverse relationship with the quality of your team&#8217;s defense and ST. Beason, and not Newton, SHOULD be the one to take offense to Alex&#8217;s comment. With the exception of N.O. and the classless way in which they run up the score, last year&#8217;s passing stats were a direct result of defensive play. Sure some of those prolific passers had gaudy stats, but the stats reflect a need as much as a ability. Whether its playing from behind, trying to keep up, or playing to stay ahead, it&#8217;s all on the defense. The Niners had a monster D last year and a ST squad that was equally monstrous. They had the best starting field position last year and a game plan that called for controlling the tempo of the game, which correlated to the 2nd lowest pass attempts in the league. What I&#8217;m getting at is exactly what Alex was getting at, stats are not a perfect reflector of the effectiveness or the value of a QB. And if it comes down to choosing between W&#8217;s and stats, Alex and I would choose W&#8217;s every time. Alex did not suggest that he is a better QB than Cam as the article and most commenters are suggesting, only that the systems and situations called for different styles of QBing. But it sure does make for overblown journalism and good reason for chest thumbing by super fans to pretend that he did make those claims&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 49erstim</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/05/28/numbers-dont-support-alex-smiths-claims-about-cam-newton/#comment-1807164</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[49erstim]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 May 2012 12:01:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=782249#comment-1807164</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hate on Alex all you want because you are entitled to your opinion and his career can bear that out, but to suggest that Cam Newton would&#039;ve taken the 49ers to the SB and won is ludicrous and you should be ashamed to take that stance, even sarcastically. I like Cam,, but he has a little way to go before he can overcome great teams in the playoffs.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hate on Alex all you want because you are entitled to your opinion and his career can bear that out, but to suggest that Cam Newton would&#8217;ve taken the 49ers to the SB and won is ludicrous and you should be ashamed to take that stance, even sarcastically. I like Cam,, but he has a little way to go before he can overcome great teams in the playoffs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: briank1ne</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/05/28/numbers-dont-support-alex-smiths-claims-about-cam-newton/#comment-1807162</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[briank1ne]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 May 2012 12:00:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=782249#comment-1807162</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[People are really making a big.deal of this. On audio it didn&#039;t sound Like smith  was talking smack but just defending himself. Looks like he&#039;s finally  in the spotlight.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>People are really making a big.deal of this. On audio it didn&#8217;t sound Like smith  was talking smack but just defending himself. Looks like he&#8217;s finally  in the spotlight.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: axespray</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/05/28/numbers-dont-support-alex-smiths-claims-about-cam-newton/#comment-1807127</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[axespray]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 May 2012 10:53:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=782249#comment-1807127</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[jibanez0810 says:May 28, 2012 2:32 PM 
&quot;At the end of the day the only numbers that matter are wins. Ask Dan Marino.&quot;

Dan Marino won a lot of games buddy... just happened to be on a lot of teams that weren&#039;t anywhere near as loaded as the 2011 49ers or the &#039;70s steelers.

If Alex Smith &amp; Terry Bradshaw played on some of those Dolphin&#039;s teams, they&#039;re out of the league faster than Brian Brohm.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>jibanez0810 says:May 28, 2012 2:32 PM<br />
&#8220;At the end of the day the only numbers that matter are wins. Ask Dan Marino.&#8221;</p>
<p>Dan Marino won a lot of games buddy&#8230; just happened to be on a lot of teams that weren&#8217;t anywhere near as loaded as the 2011 49ers or the &#8217;70s steelers.</p>
<p>If Alex Smith &amp; Terry Bradshaw played on some of those Dolphin&#8217;s teams, they&#8217;re out of the league faster than Brian Brohm.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: raideralex99</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/05/28/numbers-dont-support-alex-smiths-claims-about-cam-newton/#comment-1807103</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[raideralex99]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 May 2012 08:15:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=782249#comment-1807103</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Will people stop  comparing Alex Smith rookie stats to Cam Newton ... it&#039;s pointless.

You want stats here you go ...
 2005 ... only 2 QBs threw for 4,000+ yds.
2011 ... 10 QBs threw for 4,000+ yds with 3 of them throwing for over 5,000 yds.

The league is changing the passing game has taken over and this is why the RBs are not getting the big contracts.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Will people stop  comparing Alex Smith rookie stats to Cam Newton &#8230; it&#8217;s pointless.</p>
<p>You want stats here you go &#8230;<br />
 2005 &#8230; only 2 QBs threw for 4,000+ yds.<br />
2011 &#8230; 10 QBs threw for 4,000+ yds with 3 of them throwing for over 5,000 yds.</p>
<p>The league is changing the passing game has taken over and this is why the RBs are not getting the big contracts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: raideralex99</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/05/28/numbers-dont-support-alex-smiths-claims-about-cam-newton/#comment-1807101</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[raideralex99]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 May 2012 08:04:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=782249#comment-1807101</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wow this story just will not go away.

&quot;Attaching any member of the 49ers’ front office, coaching staff, roster (except for Smith), and fan base to a lie-detector and asking whether they’d prefer the first overall pick from 2005 or 2011 to be the San Francisco quarterback, and the answer would be unanimous.&quot;

Really one good year  ... what happens if he gets a career ending injury?
 WOW ... that&#039;s all it takes to be a HOFer ... I guess Josh Freeman is a HOFer too because he had one good year also ... seriously let Cam play afew years and then you can put him in the Hall of Fame.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow this story just will not go away.</p>
<p>&#8220;Attaching any member of the 49ers’ front office, coaching staff, roster (except for Smith), and fan base to a lie-detector and asking whether they’d prefer the first overall pick from 2005 or 2011 to be the San Francisco quarterback, and the answer would be unanimous.&#8221;</p>
<p>Really one good year  &#8230; what happens if he gets a career ending injury?<br />
 WOW &#8230; that&#8217;s all it takes to be a HOFer &#8230; I guess Josh Freeman is a HOFer too because he had one good year also &#8230; seriously let Cam play afew years and then you can put him in the Hall of Fame.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 49er4life</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/05/28/numbers-dont-support-alex-smiths-claims-about-cam-newton/#comment-1807097</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[49er4life]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 May 2012 07:43:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=782249#comment-1807097</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I just want to remind all you, &quot;if Cam was on the 9ers, it would have been Super Bowl,&quot; of one thing. The 49ers lost to the Giants because of 2 costly turnovers by the special teams unit, NOT because of Alex Smith&#039;s poor play.  In fact, it was Alex Smith&#039;s efficient play that not only got them there past the Saints, but also had them leading the game until the 2nd turnover occurred.

Frankly speaking, though I will be the first to praise Cam for his outstanding year, I would not have wanted the additional 12 turnovers, as they most definitely would have cost us a few wins.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just want to remind all you, &#8220;if Cam was on the 9ers, it would have been Super Bowl,&#8221; of one thing. The 49ers lost to the Giants because of 2 costly turnovers by the special teams unit, NOT because of Alex Smith&#8217;s poor play.  In fact, it was Alex Smith&#8217;s efficient play that not only got them there past the Saints, but also had them leading the game until the 2nd turnover occurred.</p>
<p>Frankly speaking, though I will be the first to praise Cam for his outstanding year, I would not have wanted the additional 12 turnovers, as they most definitely would have cost us a few wins.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jf49ers</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/05/28/numbers-dont-support-alex-smiths-claims-about-cam-newton/#comment-1807016</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jf49ers]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 May 2012 03:50:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=782249#comment-1807016</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Could it be that the defenses in the NFC South are garbage? I mean,  the 49ers scored 45 and 36 against the two teams that they faced. Not bad for a weak offense and quarterback.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Could it be that the defenses in the NFC South are garbage? I mean,  the 49ers scored 45 and 36 against the two teams that they faced. Not bad for a weak offense and quarterback.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jbl429</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/05/28/numbers-dont-support-alex-smiths-claims-about-cam-newton/#comment-1806986</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jbl429]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 May 2012 03:18:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=782249#comment-1806986</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Who cares about 1st vs. 2nd half stats.  Look at passing numbers while ahead vs. behind.  I&#039;m not an Alex Smith fan, but I&#039;m sure Cam Newton was playing from behind most of the entire season.  Smith has a valid point, but at the same time, you can&#039;t discount the season Cam Newton had.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who cares about 1st vs. 2nd half stats.  Look at passing numbers while ahead vs. behind.  I&#8217;m not an Alex Smith fan, but I&#8217;m sure Cam Newton was playing from behind most of the entire season.  Smith has a valid point, but at the same time, you can&#8217;t discount the season Cam Newton had.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gadgetdawg</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/05/28/numbers-dont-support-alex-smiths-claims-about-cam-newton/#comment-1806952</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[gadgetdawg]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 May 2012 02:22:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=782249#comment-1806952</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Has anyone even looked at Smith&#039;s record before this season? I really don&#039;t think this is the man that should be boasting about wins to anyone. Considering Newton was responsible for 35 TDs this year and Alex has been good for 72 (reg season) over 6 years makes it a bit worse for Mr Smith.

I&#039;d compare their rookie seasons to be fair.

Newton- 35TD, 17int and 2 fumbles   
VS
Smith- 1TD, 11int and 2 fumbles.

I do agree that there is no comparing who the better QB is but the 9er homers won&#039;t like the answer. . .]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Has anyone even looked at Smith&#8217;s record before this season? I really don&#8217;t think this is the man that should be boasting about wins to anyone. Considering Newton was responsible for 35 TDs this year and Alex has been good for 72 (reg season) over 6 years makes it a bit worse for Mr Smith.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d compare their rookie seasons to be fair.</p>
<p>Newton- 35TD, 17int and 2 fumbles<br />
VS<br />
Smith- 1TD, 11int and 2 fumbles.</p>
<p>I do agree that there is no comparing who the better QB is but the 9er homers won&#8217;t like the answer. . .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: christopher5777</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/05/28/numbers-dont-support-alex-smiths-claims-about-cam-newton/#comment-1806914</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[christopher5777]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 May 2012 01:34:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=782249#comment-1806914</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Put Alex Smith on the Panthers, Clausen is starting by week 8. Put Cam on the 49ers and they are hoisting the Lombardi trophy.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Put Alex Smith on the Panthers, Clausen is starting by week 8. Put Cam on the 49ers and they are hoisting the Lombardi trophy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: latchbeam</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/05/28/numbers-dont-support-alex-smiths-claims-about-cam-newton/#comment-1806893</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[latchbeam]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 May 2012 01:13:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=782249#comment-1806893</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[13-3... That&#039;s his point.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>13-3&#8230; That&#8217;s his point.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sonoco</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/05/28/numbers-dont-support-alex-smiths-claims-about-cam-newton/#comment-1806887</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[sonoco]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 May 2012 01:11:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=782249#comment-1806887</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[All Alex needed to say is stats don&#039;t matter when you&#039;re 13-3 and parked it right there.  He didn&#039;t need to bring Cam&#039;s name ore anybody else for that matter . . . and since Alex Smith doesn&#039;t do twitter my guess is that you&#039;ll hear Smith say something close to that sometime after Tuesday&#039;s OTA&#039;s.  This is a big yawn.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All Alex needed to say is stats don&#8217;t matter when you&#8217;re 13-3 and parked it right there.  He didn&#8217;t need to bring Cam&#8217;s name ore anybody else for that matter . . . and since Alex Smith doesn&#8217;t do twitter my guess is that you&#8217;ll hear Smith say something close to that sometime after Tuesday&#8217;s OTA&#8217;s.  This is a big yawn.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: capitaloffense</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/05/28/numbers-dont-support-alex-smiths-claims-about-cam-newton/#comment-1806882</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[capitaloffense]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 May 2012 01:08:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=782249#comment-1806882</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@ceadderman

You make some great points.  Unfortunately defenses are ranked by yards, not points or turnover ratio.  Just to play devil&#039;s advocate to your point:  

1.) The Pats for example had a terrible defense when measured by yards, however I recall them leading the league in takeaways.  So while giving up many yards, they were putting the ball back in their QB&#039;s hands more allowing Brady to rack up more yards.

2.) Another way to look at is, a great offense with a short passing game and/or running game is able to keep their defense off the field and rested.  So if a defense&#039;s rank is measured by yards, an average defense may look great due to opposing offenses not getting the opportunity due to a great time of possession strategy.

What you speak of is just the ebb and flow of the game.  Situations can play out differently based on the random occurences in a series of games.  Offense begets Defense and vice versa.  Not to mention Special Teams contributions.  This kind of lessens the importance of stats, which are still quite important.

What we can go by, is what we see over the long haul of a season visually and use stats to bolster our visual analysis.  Honestly, to me it&#039;s a no brainer to crown Newton as &quot;better&quot; than Smith by LOOKING and ASSESSING.  Not having an all pro receiver doesn&#039;t necessarily excuse Alex Smith.  Steve Smith had plenty of QBs throw to him and they weren&#039;t producing like Cam was.  Hell, most people thought S. Smith was done.  On the other side of the coin, who did Sam Bradford have in his rookie year?  When you are good and it is visually represented by your play it will show in the numbers.  Alex Smith doesn&#039;t stack up to Cam when visually assessed and his numbers quite frankly show that.  When Newton gets more years under his belt we will have a better view of this picture.  As of now, clearly it&#039;s Newton &gt; Smith, as football player despite win/loss record.  No one is questioning that wins are what really matters though.  

As a side note:  While I somewhat agree with the point Alex Smith was trying to make I think rexryansfork&#039;s quote sums it up best: &quot;Game managers should not be talking about game changers.&quot;  Simple, yet eloquent.  Keep another man&#039;s name out of your mouth and we wouldn&#039;t be having this discussion.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ceadderman</p>
<p>You make some great points.  Unfortunately defenses are ranked by yards, not points or turnover ratio.  Just to play devil&#8217;s advocate to your point:  </p>
<p>1.) The Pats for example had a terrible defense when measured by yards, however I recall them leading the league in takeaways.  So while giving up many yards, they were putting the ball back in their QB&#8217;s hands more allowing Brady to rack up more yards.</p>
<p>2.) Another way to look at is, a great offense with a short passing game and/or running game is able to keep their defense off the field and rested.  So if a defense&#8217;s rank is measured by yards, an average defense may look great due to opposing offenses not getting the opportunity due to a great time of possession strategy.</p>
<p>What you speak of is just the ebb and flow of the game.  Situations can play out differently based on the random occurences in a series of games.  Offense begets Defense and vice versa.  Not to mention Special Teams contributions.  This kind of lessens the importance of stats, which are still quite important.</p>
<p>What we can go by, is what we see over the long haul of a season visually and use stats to bolster our visual analysis.  Honestly, to me it&#8217;s a no brainer to crown Newton as &#8220;better&#8221; than Smith by LOOKING and ASSESSING.  Not having an all pro receiver doesn&#8217;t necessarily excuse Alex Smith.  Steve Smith had plenty of QBs throw to him and they weren&#8217;t producing like Cam was.  Hell, most people thought S. Smith was done.  On the other side of the coin, who did Sam Bradford have in his rookie year?  When you are good and it is visually represented by your play it will show in the numbers.  Alex Smith doesn&#8217;t stack up to Cam when visually assessed and his numbers quite frankly show that.  When Newton gets more years under his belt we will have a better view of this picture.  As of now, clearly it&#8217;s Newton &gt; Smith, as football player despite win/loss record.  No one is questioning that wins are what really matters though.  </p>
<p>As a side note:  While I somewhat agree with the point Alex Smith was trying to make I think rexryansfork&#8217;s quote sums it up best: &#8220;Game managers should not be talking about game changers.&#8221;  Simple, yet eloquent.  Keep another man&#8217;s name out of your mouth and we wouldn&#8217;t be having this discussion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rexryansfork</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/05/28/numbers-dont-support-alex-smiths-claims-about-cam-newton/#comment-1806858</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[rexryansfork]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 May 2012 00:46:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=782249#comment-1806858</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Alex&#039;s point was right but he shouldn&#039;t have brought Cam into this. But since he did he should think about one thing:

If it was Cam playing qb for the niners, it&#039;s them in the super bowl, not the giants. Game managers should not be talking about game changers.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alex&#8217;s point was right but he shouldn&#8217;t have brought Cam into this. But since he did he should think about one thing:</p>
<p>If it was Cam playing qb for the niners, it&#8217;s them in the super bowl, not the giants. Game managers should not be talking about game changers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ceadderman</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/05/28/numbers-dont-support-alex-smiths-claims-about-cam-newton/#comment-1806829</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ceadderman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 May 2012 00:00:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=782249#comment-1806829</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[deetrain11... Smith also only Started 9 games and please show us the All Pro Receiver that Smith had in his Rookie season?

I&#039;m pretty sure that Newton was throwing bombs to Steve Smith. Bet Alex Smith would have personally hacked off his left nut to have an All Pro Receiver to throw to in his rookie year and woulda given up his right one for a Line that would give him an average of 3 seconds a snap.

But yeah Superman Cam is just so much better. :/]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>deetrain11&#8230; Smith also only Started 9 games and please show us the All Pro Receiver that Smith had in his Rookie season?</p>
<p>I&#8217;m pretty sure that Newton was throwing bombs to Steve Smith. Bet Alex Smith would have personally hacked off his left nut to have an All Pro Receiver to throw to in his rookie year and woulda given up his right one for a Line that would give him an average of 3 seconds a snap.</p>
<p>But yeah Superman Cam is just so much better. :/</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ceadderman</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/05/28/numbers-dont-support-alex-smiths-claims-about-cam-newton/#comment-1806821</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ceadderman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 May 2012 23:45:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=782249#comment-1806821</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[People need to chill. Smith wasn&#039;t picking on Newton. He was picking on the Panthers season record is what he was picking on.

He gave Newton the credit the kid deserves. But the truth is would you rather have stats or Wins? Give me the latter every day of the week and twice on Sundays.

Funny thing about stats though, the QBs&#039; who threw for over 4k yards? Not a single one of their Defenses ranked over 23. Only ONE of those QBs&#039; had less than 10 Picks on the season as well. The odds are that the more you throw the ball the more Interceptions you throw too. Interceptions that put your Defense back out on the field. The longer a Defense is on the field the likelihood that the Opponent will score. The more the Opponent scores your QB has to answer.

It&#039;s great for Fantasy Football, but if you wish to be successful it&#039;s best not to throw more than 40 times a game if you can help it.

3400 yds is nothing but look at what the 9er Defense ranked last year? 4th. The 9ers didn&#039;t need Smith to throw a lot. Regardless of 3rd down stats Smith got it done when he needed to and a 13-3 Regular season record to show for his troubles.

Even Newton would give up the stats to get a shot at the prize. Anyone that thinks differently, well their elevator doesn&#039;t go to the top.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>People need to chill. Smith wasn&#8217;t picking on Newton. He was picking on the Panthers season record is what he was picking on.</p>
<p>He gave Newton the credit the kid deserves. But the truth is would you rather have stats or Wins? Give me the latter every day of the week and twice on Sundays.</p>
<p>Funny thing about stats though, the QBs&#8217; who threw for over 4k yards? Not a single one of their Defenses ranked over 23. Only ONE of those QBs&#8217; had less than 10 Picks on the season as well. The odds are that the more you throw the ball the more Interceptions you throw too. Interceptions that put your Defense back out on the field. The longer a Defense is on the field the likelihood that the Opponent will score. The more the Opponent scores your QB has to answer.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s great for Fantasy Football, but if you wish to be successful it&#8217;s best not to throw more than 40 times a game if you can help it.</p>
<p>3400 yds is nothing but look at what the 9er Defense ranked last year? 4th. The 9ers didn&#8217;t need Smith to throw a lot. Regardless of 3rd down stats Smith got it done when he needed to and a 13-3 Regular season record to show for his troubles.</p>
<p>Even Newton would give up the stats to get a shot at the prize. Anyone that thinks differently, well their elevator doesn&#8217;t go to the top.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chrismatthewsucks</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/05/28/numbers-dont-support-alex-smiths-claims-about-cam-newton/#comment-1806820</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[chrismatthewsucks]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 May 2012 23:42:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=782249#comment-1806820</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[hahaha Alex Smith is one of the biggests busts in recent history. 

28 other NFL Qb&#039;s &gt; A. Smith. 

Smith Shut up, you are garbage!!! hell Patrick Willis could have more yards then you.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hahaha Alex Smith is one of the biggests busts in recent history. </p>
<p>28 other NFL Qb&#8217;s &gt; A. Smith. </p>
<p>Smith Shut up, you are garbage!!! hell Patrick Willis could have more yards then you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mrlynch33</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/05/28/numbers-dont-support-alex-smiths-claims-about-cam-newton/#comment-1806811</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[mrlynch33]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 May 2012 23:35:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=782249#comment-1806811</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I would take Alex Smith. Only 5 picks last year. Ohh, And let&#039;s not forget about his performance against the Saints in the playoffs last year....Cam is good but he hasn&#039;t played as well as Alex did that last 5 minutes.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would take Alex Smith. Only 5 picks last year. Ohh, And let&#8217;s not forget about his performance against the Saints in the playoffs last year&#8230;.Cam is good but he hasn&#8217;t played as well as Alex did that last 5 minutes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: panamon</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/05/28/numbers-dont-support-alex-smiths-claims-about-cam-newton/#comment-1806790</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[panamon]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 May 2012 23:13:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=782249#comment-1806790</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wow what a terrible piece of journalism. To make the title accurate it would have to say &quot;[Two cherrypicked and oddly specific] numbers don&#039;t support...&quot;. No additional research or even any sort of mention that the huge conclusion you just drew might not align with the mass of other data that exists (as proven in the comments). YPG in losses/wins was the main point and Alex Smith was 100% correct.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow what a terrible piece of journalism. To make the title accurate it would have to say &#8220;[Two cherrypicked and oddly specific] numbers don&#8217;t support&#8230;&#8221;. No additional research or even any sort of mention that the huge conclusion you just drew might not align with the mass of other data that exists (as proven in the comments). YPG in losses/wins was the main point and Alex Smith was 100% correct.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
