<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Burbank retains jurisdiction as to Hargrove</title>
	<atom:link href="http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/06/04/burbank-retains-jurisdiction-as-to-hargrove/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/06/04/burbank-retains-jurisdiction-as-to-hargrove/</link>
	<description>ProFootballTalk on NBCSports.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 03:18:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: sdisme</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/06/04/burbank-retains-jurisdiction-as-to-hargrove/#comment-1818102</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[sdisme]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jun 2012 21:25:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=804076#comment-1818102</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What we also now know it the reason Goodell didn&#039;t punish the 22-27 players is he knew the appeal would fall out of his jurisdiction.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What we also now know it the reason Goodell didn&#8217;t punish the 22-27 players is he knew the appeal would fall out of his jurisdiction.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jedidev</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/06/04/burbank-retains-jurisdiction-as-to-hargrove/#comment-1817839</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jedidev]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jun 2012 19:13:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=804076#comment-1817839</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[bigjdve says:Jun 4, 2012 10:25 AM 

How come the players aren’t suing De Smith? 

He is the reason that nobody can touch Goodell.

----------------------

It&#039;s almost like Goodell had this in his sights while negotiating the CBA (perhaps why he sat on this for several years before taking action).  Had he gone through with a railroad job like this &lt;i&gt;before&lt;/i&gt; the CBA, there&#039;s no way the NFLPA would have allowed him the power he has now.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>bigjdve says:Jun 4, 2012 10:25 AM </p>
<p>How come the players aren’t suing De Smith? </p>
<p>He is the reason that nobody can touch Goodell.</p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-</p>
<p>It&#8217;s almost like Goodell had this in his sights while negotiating the CBA (perhaps why he sat on this for several years before taking action).  Had he gone through with a railroad job like this <i>before</i> the CBA, there&#8217;s no way the NFLPA would have allowed him the power he has now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bigjdve</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/06/04/burbank-retains-jurisdiction-as-to-hargrove/#comment-1817642</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[bigjdve]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jun 2012 17:34:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=804076#comment-1817642</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[saintsfan26: 

We know that the Saints admitted to the bounty program. Not just a pay for play, but the bounty program when they took responsibility for their actions. 

The harshness of the penalties are not only based on the actions but the fact that there was a cover-up. 

At this point I would suggest that they stop complaining and just take the punishment, if for no other reason then it looks like they will lose more in the legal fight than they would&#039;ve made for the time they were suspended. 

Regarding Stallworth, I think that Goodell took in to account the other penalties that he had such as jail, fines, and payouts to the family. Are bounties equal to a death no, however compounded will sooner or later add up to the same amount of time.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>saintsfan26: </p>
<p>We know that the Saints admitted to the bounty program. Not just a pay for play, but the bounty program when they took responsibility for their actions. </p>
<p>The harshness of the penalties are not only based on the actions but the fact that there was a cover-up. </p>
<p>At this point I would suggest that they stop complaining and just take the punishment, if for no other reason then it looks like they will lose more in the legal fight than they would&#8217;ve made for the time they were suspended. </p>
<p>Regarding Stallworth, I think that Goodell took in to account the other penalties that he had such as jail, fines, and payouts to the family. Are bounties equal to a death no, however compounded will sooner or later add up to the same amount of time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: saintsfan26</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/06/04/burbank-retains-jurisdiction-as-to-hargrove/#comment-1817567</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[saintsfan26]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jun 2012 17:03:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=804076#comment-1817567</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[At least we all know what really happened now.  The Saints had a pay-for-performance program.  The same type of program that all other teams have and have even admitted to.  But the Saints werent punished solely on that fact alone.  They were punished so severely because of intentionally trying to injure opponents.  We know that Goodell&#039;s evidence of pay-for-performance is strong.  But we also know that his evidence for Saints intentionally trying to injure opponents is weak.  Its weaker than weak.  Its laughable.  Therefore we can all agree that the punishments do not fit the crime.  Donte Stallworth killed somebody and got 1 year suspension.  Vilma paid somebody for an interception and got a 1 year suspension.  What a joke.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At least we all know what really happened now.  The Saints had a pay-for-performance program.  The same type of program that all other teams have and have even admitted to.  But the Saints werent punished solely on that fact alone.  They were punished so severely because of intentionally trying to injure opponents.  We know that Goodell&#8217;s evidence of pay-for-performance is strong.  But we also know that his evidence for Saints intentionally trying to injure opponents is weak.  Its weaker than weak.  Its laughable.  Therefore we can all agree that the punishments do not fit the crime.  Donte Stallworth killed somebody and got 1 year suspension.  Vilma paid somebody for an interception and got a 1 year suspension.  What a joke.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thingamajig</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/06/04/burbank-retains-jurisdiction-as-to-hargrove/#comment-1817379</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[thingamajig]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jun 2012 15:08:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=804076#comment-1817379</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Burbank interpreted the CBA for Vilma, NFLPA and all their smart lawyers.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Burbank interpreted the CBA for Vilma, NFLPA and all their smart lawyers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bigjdve</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/06/04/burbank-retains-jurisdiction-as-to-hargrove/#comment-1817315</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[bigjdve]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jun 2012 14:25:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=804076#comment-1817315</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How come the players aren&#039;t suing De Smith? 

He is the reason that nobody can touch Goodell.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How come the players aren&#8217;t suing De Smith? </p>
<p>He is the reason that nobody can touch Goodell.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
