<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Max Starks not expected back with Steelers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/06/04/max-starks-not-expected-back-with-steelers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/06/04/max-starks-not-expected-back-with-steelers/</link>
	<description>ProFootballTalk on NBCSports.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 05:11:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: steel2372</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/06/04/max-starks-not-expected-back-with-steelers/#comment-1819665</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[steel2372]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2012 23:14:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=803998#comment-1819665</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[And As the Nest Burns…..The Steelers are living in the Ravens little head rent free.   Starks is welcome back in Steel country anytime. I still believe they will sign him back. He is a great Steeler.   
Dont worry Ravenator revenge will be sweet for the Steelers. 


Go Steelers!!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And As the Nest Burns…..The Steelers are living in the Ravens little head rent free.   Starks is welcome back in Steel country anytime. I still believe they will sign him back. He is a great Steeler.<br />
Dont worry Ravenator revenge will be sweet for the Steelers. </p>
<p>Go Steelers!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: quittsburghstoolers</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/06/04/max-starks-not-expected-back-with-steelers/#comment-1818737</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[quittsburghstoolers]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2012 11:31:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=803998#comment-1818737</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yeah, right.

As soon as they get a couple of OL injuries they&#039;ll be calling this guy...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, right.</p>
<p>As soon as they get a couple of OL injuries they&#8217;ll be calling this guy&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jimmer2372</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/06/04/max-starks-not-expected-back-with-steelers/#comment-1818614</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jimmer2372]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2012 04:04:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=803998#comment-1818614</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Steelers still living in Ravenator&#039;s little head rent free.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steelers still living in Ravenator&#8217;s little head rent free.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: st1llerz1</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/06/04/max-starks-not-expected-back-with-steelers/#comment-1818564</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[st1llerz1]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2012 03:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=803998#comment-1818564</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I can just picture ravenator sitting in his Mom&#039;s basement all day just waiting for a Steelers post to appear on the board.  The pencil necked little geek, who never set foot on the field of play, but sniffed each and every jockstrap before he loaded it into the washing machine in the trainers room.

As the post comes up he cackles wildly dreaming up a new way to slam the enemy of his beloved crows.  The only thing that can interupt his marvelous novels is Mom calling him upstairs for breakfast of one of his &quot;little friends&quot; knocking on the door and asking if &quot;Uncle Timmie&quot; can come out to play.

Useless tool....

As the Nest Burns....

GO STEELERS!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can just picture ravenator sitting in his Mom&#8217;s basement all day just waiting for a Steelers post to appear on the board.  The pencil necked little geek, who never set foot on the field of play, but sniffed each and every jockstrap before he loaded it into the washing machine in the trainers room.</p>
<p>As the post comes up he cackles wildly dreaming up a new way to slam the enemy of his beloved crows.  The only thing that can interupt his marvelous novels is Mom calling him upstairs for breakfast of one of his &#8220;little friends&#8221; knocking on the door and asking if &#8220;Uncle Timmie&#8221; can come out to play.</p>
<p>Useless tool&#8230;.</p>
<p>As the Nest Burns&#8230;.</p>
<p>GO STEELERS!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Deb</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/06/04/max-starks-not-expected-back-with-steelers/#comment-1818513</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Deb]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2012 02:12:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=803998#comment-1818513</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[antibenapalooza says: 

I am waiting for the day when Rottenberger is not back with the team!

-------------------------------------------------
ROFL ... I&#039;m sure you are lil Ravens fan. But what makes you think that will improve your fortunes?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>antibenapalooza says: </p>
<p>I am waiting for the day when Rottenberger is not back with the team!</p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-<br />
ROFL &#8230; I&#8217;m sure you are lil Ravens fan. But what makes you think that will improve your fortunes?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ravenatorisatool</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/06/04/max-starks-not-expected-back-with-steelers/#comment-1818506</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ravenatorisatool]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2012 02:04:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=803998#comment-1818506</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Steeler fans, thumbs up if you like my name]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steeler fans, thumbs up if you like my name</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ravenator</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/06/04/max-starks-not-expected-back-with-steelers/#comment-1818412</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ravenator]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2012 00:45:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=803998#comment-1818412</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Keep on hating Steeley, soon funny]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Keep on hating Steeley, soon funny</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: steelymcbeam6</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/06/04/max-starks-not-expected-back-with-steelers/#comment-1818341</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[steelymcbeam6]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jun 2012 23:59:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=803998#comment-1818341</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Vegas thinks the steelers are relevant...have them going 11-5 (same as the ravens) I know you&#039;re to dumb to understand this ravenator but Vegas is pretty damn good at this stuff and when they think a team is relevant they are.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Vegas thinks the steelers are relevant&#8230;have them going 11-5 (same as the ravens) I know you&#8217;re to dumb to understand this ravenator but Vegas is pretty damn good at this stuff and when they think a team is relevant they are.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: antibenapalooza</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/06/04/max-starks-not-expected-back-with-steelers/#comment-1818292</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[antibenapalooza]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jun 2012 23:29:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=803998#comment-1818292</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I am waiting for the day when Rottenberger is not back with the team!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am waiting for the day when Rottenberger is not back with the team!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ravenator</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/06/04/max-starks-not-expected-back-with-steelers/#comment-1818260</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ravenator]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jun 2012 23:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=803998#comment-1818260</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sorry, steelers are still not relevant, try sweeping the division ala the Ravens. Keep on hating haters, it&#039;s too funny]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry, steelers are still not relevant, try sweeping the division ala the Ravens. Keep on hating haters, it&#8217;s too funny</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Deb</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/06/04/max-starks-not-expected-back-with-steelers/#comment-1817993</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Deb]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jun 2012 20:25:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=803998#comment-1817993</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@ravenator ...

No ... being swept means we lost two regular-season games to the Ravens in 2011. You guys owned us last year. Congrats on that. But in the end, your team didn&#039;t get one step closer to the Lombardi than when we split the series. Now it&#039;s a new day and we&#039;re all back at the starting line. You didn&#039;t improve your 2012 relevance ... and you certainly didn&#039;t damage ours.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ravenator &#8230;</p>
<p>No &#8230; being swept means we lost two regular-season games to the Ravens in 2011. You guys owned us last year. Congrats on that. But in the end, your team didn&#8217;t get one step closer to the Lombardi than when we split the series. Now it&#8217;s a new day and we&#8217;re all back at the starting line. You didn&#8217;t improve your 2012 relevance &#8230; and you certainly didn&#8217;t damage ours.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vasteelerfan</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/06/04/max-starks-not-expected-back-with-steelers/#comment-1817948</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[vasteelerfan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jun 2012 20:05:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=803998#comment-1817948</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks max you did a pretty good job last year. And cundiffs kick is wide right. Rent free in ravenators tiny head. Go steelers!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks max you did a pretty good job last year. And cundiffs kick is wide right. Rent free in ravenators tiny head. Go steelers!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: st1llerz1</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/06/04/max-starks-not-expected-back-with-steelers/#comment-1817841</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[st1llerz1]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jun 2012 19:14:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=803998#comment-1817841</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Those will be sweet words to feed back to this troll after the 2012 season.....

GO STEELERS!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Those will be sweet words to feed back to this troll after the 2012 season&#8230;..</p>
<p>GO STEELERS!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ravenator</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/06/04/max-starks-not-expected-back-with-steelers/#comment-1817764</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ravenator]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jun 2012 18:27:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=803998#comment-1817764</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Poor cry babies in Pittsburgh can&#039;t realize a sweep means your team is no longer relevant. Try winning a game this season vs my ravens before talking. You certainly couldn&#039;t do it last season.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Poor cry babies in Pittsburgh can&#8217;t realize a sweep means your team is no longer relevant. Try winning a game this season vs my ravens before talking. You certainly couldn&#8217;t do it last season.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: steelymcbeam6</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/06/04/max-starks-not-expected-back-with-steelers/#comment-1817690</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[steelymcbeam6]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jun 2012 17:57:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=803998#comment-1817690</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In a older posts i pointed out to a ravens fan the ravens all time record against the steelers is 14-24. So ravenator says &quot;sucks trying to use past history as any indicator of the future.&quot; hypocrisy much? ironic coming from a guy that mentions games from LAST SEASON on every post. just like holeinone said...obviously this guy is terrified of this upcoming season and tries to hide it with his wannabe tough guy talk.

It&#039;s impossible to have an intelligent conversation with that guy. You give the guy a valid assessment on his team and his only response is &quot;yea well we swept you last season!&quot; ravenator was obviously breast feed much to long and his mother still must tell him what a &quot;special man&quot; he is. Does she still cut up your steak in little pieces for you too ravenator?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In a older posts i pointed out to a ravens fan the ravens all time record against the steelers is 14-24. So ravenator says &#8220;sucks trying to use past history as any indicator of the future.&#8221; hypocrisy much? ironic coming from a guy that mentions games from LAST SEASON on every post. just like holeinone said&#8230;obviously this guy is terrified of this upcoming season and tries to hide it with his wannabe tough guy talk.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s impossible to have an intelligent conversation with that guy. You give the guy a valid assessment on his team and his only response is &#8220;yea well we swept you last season!&#8221; ravenator was obviously breast feed much to long and his mother still must tell him what a &#8220;special man&#8221; he is. Does she still cut up your steak in little pieces for you too ravenator?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Deb</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/06/04/max-starks-not-expected-back-with-steelers/#comment-1817656</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Deb]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jun 2012 17:39:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=803998#comment-1817656</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We&#039;re not going to need Max as a primary player. Adams wasn&#039;t drafted to fail. We have our new line going forward. Max would be a luxury--a good guy to have as a backup in case a starter is injured. Whether we could do that would depend on our budget and the availability of a roster spot. It would be nice to have that cushion given our recent history of late-season injuries on the o-line. But if we can&#039;t swing it, that&#039;s not going to have an impact on the performance of our starting line.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We&#8217;re not going to need Max as a primary player. Adams wasn&#8217;t drafted to fail. We have our new line going forward. Max would be a luxury&#8211;a good guy to have as a backup in case a starter is injured. Whether we could do that would depend on our budget and the availability of a roster spot. It would be nice to have that cushion given our recent history of late-season injuries on the o-line. But if we can&#8217;t swing it, that&#8217;s not going to have an impact on the performance of our starting line.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: st1llerz1</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/06/04/max-starks-not-expected-back-with-steelers/#comment-1817554</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[st1llerz1]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jun 2012 16:52:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=803998#comment-1817554</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Perhaps we should just refer the trolling turd to our two most recent first and second round offensive line draft picks.  Pouncey and Gilbert have shown themselves to be fine offensive lineman.  One was an All-Pro as a rookie and the other played quite well as a rookie and will now be trusted to protect the blindside, a task at which Oher has failed miserably.

In the meantime, the only thing the crows are assured of is having the highest consumption rate of donuts per capita in the history of the league on their offensive line.

As the Nest Burns....

GO STEELERS!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps we should just refer the trolling turd to our two most recent first and second round offensive line draft picks.  Pouncey and Gilbert have shown themselves to be fine offensive lineman.  One was an All-Pro as a rookie and the other played quite well as a rookie and will now be trusted to protect the blindside, a task at which Oher has failed miserably.</p>
<p>In the meantime, the only thing the crows are assured of is having the highest consumption rate of donuts per capita in the history of the league on their offensive line.</p>
<p>As the Nest Burns&#8230;.</p>
<p>GO STEELERS!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mostlombardisintheleague</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/06/04/max-starks-not-expected-back-with-steelers/#comment-1817544</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[mostlombardisintheleague]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jun 2012 16:45:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=803998#comment-1817544</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ravenator says:
Jun 4, 2012 8:19 AM
Their Oline is going to be awful, again. Love the fans who think two rookies with zero snaps in the NFL are guaranteed first year pro bowlers. Once again, Ben will be running for his life, cheers!

______________________________

Does Maurkice Pouncey, Rookie Super Bowl team and Pro Bowl center ring a bell ?
And Suggs&#039; replacement is a guarantee Pro Bowl correct ?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ravenator says:<br />
Jun 4, 2012 8:19 AM<br />
Their Oline is going to be awful, again. Love the fans who think two rookies with zero snaps in the NFL are guaranteed first year pro bowlers. Once again, Ben will be running for his life, cheers!</p>
<p>______________________________</p>
<p>Does Maurkice Pouncey, Rookie Super Bowl team and Pro Bowl center ring a bell ?<br />
And Suggs&#8217; replacement is a guarantee Pro Bowl correct ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: holeinone09</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/06/04/max-starks-not-expected-back-with-steelers/#comment-1817501</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[holeinone09]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jun 2012 16:20:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=803998#comment-1817501</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Have any of you ever seen a fan so afraid of the upcoming season as this ravenator dude?  This person breathlessly awaits any post about the Steelers and then proceeds to try to convince himself the Ravens will be lucky enough to repeat what they did to the Steelers last year.  

No Suggs, older Lewis and Reed, a weak QB like Flaccid, and contract issues with Rice.  Sounds like ravenator is trying to distract himself from all the internal problems the Ravens are dealing with.  How special.

GO STEELERS!!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Have any of you ever seen a fan so afraid of the upcoming season as this ravenator dude?  This person breathlessly awaits any post about the Steelers and then proceeds to try to convince himself the Ravens will be lucky enough to repeat what they did to the Steelers last year.  </p>
<p>No Suggs, older Lewis and Reed, a weak QB like Flaccid, and contract issues with Rice.  Sounds like ravenator is trying to distract himself from all the internal problems the Ravens are dealing with.  How special.</p>
<p>GO STEELERS!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dontstabmeray</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/06/04/max-starks-not-expected-back-with-steelers/#comment-1817460</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[dontstabmeray]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jun 2012 16:02:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=803998#comment-1817460</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ravenator says: 
Jun 4, 2012 8:19 AM 
Their Oline is going to be awful, again. Love the fans who think two rookies with zero snaps in the NFL are guaranteed first year pro bowlers. Once again, Ben will be running for his life, cheers!

__________________________________

Steelers live rent free in ravenators tiny little head.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ravenator says:<br />
Jun 4, 2012 8:19 AM<br />
Their Oline is going to be awful, again. Love the fans who think two rookies with zero snaps in the NFL are guaranteed first year pro bowlers. Once again, Ben will be running for his life, cheers!</p>
<p>__________________________________</p>
<p>Steelers live rent free in ravenators tiny little head.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sudz28</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/06/04/max-starks-not-expected-back-with-steelers/#comment-1817452</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[sudz28]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jun 2012 15:54:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=803998#comment-1817452</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Maybe the Ratbirds will pick him up, they have a penchant for taking our leftovers.  Wishful thinking, I guess (although they did get a couple good years out of Rod Woodson so maybe they keep hoping lightning will strike twice).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe the Ratbirds will pick him up, they have a penchant for taking our leftovers.  Wishful thinking, I guess (although they did get a couple good years out of Rod Woodson so maybe they keep hoping lightning will strike twice).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: waxthat</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/06/04/max-starks-not-expected-back-with-steelers/#comment-1817410</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[waxthat]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jun 2012 15:26:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=803998#comment-1817410</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[not surprised..Aldon Smith abused this guy last year]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>not surprised..Aldon Smith abused this guy last year</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: st1llerz1</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/06/04/max-starks-not-expected-back-with-steelers/#comment-1817369</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[st1llerz1]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jun 2012 15:04:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=803998#comment-1817369</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@ravenator...

Meanwhile, the crows try to oil the wheels on the walker their center uses to get from the huddle to the line of scrimmage and attempt to fill an All-Pro gap at guard with a big tub of goo named Jah Reid.

Shouldn&#039;t you be trolling the crows board praying they find a way to get their offense into camp, sign the greatest quarterback in the history of the NFL and plug the pacifier back into the mouth of your tackle whiffing safety?

As the Nest Burns....

GO STEELERS!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ravenator&#8230;</p>
<p>Meanwhile, the crows try to oil the wheels on the walker their center uses to get from the huddle to the line of scrimmage and attempt to fill an All-Pro gap at guard with a big tub of goo named Jah Reid.</p>
<p>Shouldn&#8217;t you be trolling the crows board praying they find a way to get their offense into camp, sign the greatest quarterback in the history of the NFL and plug the pacifier back into the mouth of your tackle whiffing safety?</p>
<p>As the Nest Burns&#8230;.</p>
<p>GO STEELERS!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: steelerssmack4u</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/06/04/max-starks-not-expected-back-with-steelers/#comment-1817294</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[steelerssmack4u]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jun 2012 14:10:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=803998#comment-1817294</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Starks with one leg is better than Jonathan Scott]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Starks with one leg is better than Jonathan Scott</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tinbender2000</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/06/04/max-starks-not-expected-back-with-steelers/#comment-1817268</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[tinbender2000]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jun 2012 13:48:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=803998#comment-1817268</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[steelernationisthepinnacleofexistenceyouarenothing says: Jun 4, 2012 7:52 AM

He clearly wasn’t worthy.

--------------------------------------------------------------

If you took a poll of Steeler players : are you worthy as a fan?  As a tackling dummy, yes. But as a fan, not so much.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>steelernationisthepinnacleofexistenceyouarenothing says: Jun 4, 2012 7:52 AM</p>
<p>He clearly wasn’t worthy.</p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;</p>
<p>If you took a poll of Steeler players : are you worthy as a fan?  As a tackling dummy, yes. But as a fan, not so much.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: blacknyellablacknyella</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/06/04/max-starks-not-expected-back-with-steelers/#comment-1817221</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[blacknyellablacknyella]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jun 2012 13:08:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=803998#comment-1817221</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Send him down to our farm team in Glendale for a year and hope his game doesn&#039;t regress like McFadden&#039;s.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Send him down to our farm team in Glendale for a year and hope his game doesn&#8217;t regress like McFadden&#8217;s.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: blacknyellablacknyella</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/06/04/max-starks-not-expected-back-with-steelers/#comment-1817217</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[blacknyellablacknyella]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jun 2012 13:04:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=803998#comment-1817217</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Send him down to our AAA team in Glendale for a while then bring him back in a year. Hope they don&#039;t ruin him like they did McFadden.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Send him down to our AAA team in Glendale for a while then bring him back in a year. Hope they don&#8217;t ruin him like they did McFadden.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: footballfanatic1906</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/06/04/max-starks-not-expected-back-with-steelers/#comment-1817207</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[footballfanatic1906]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jun 2012 12:57:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=803998#comment-1817207</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[steelernationisthepinnacleofexistenceyouarenothing says:
Jun 4, 2012 7:52 AM
He clearly wasn’t worthy.

 Worthy to get thrashed by the Ravens again? Lmao]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>steelernationisthepinnacleofexistenceyouarenothing says:<br />
Jun 4, 2012 7:52 AM<br />
He clearly wasn’t worthy.</p>
<p> Worthy to get thrashed by the Ravens again? Lmao</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: peytonsforehead</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/06/04/max-starks-not-expected-back-with-steelers/#comment-1817169</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[peytonsforehead]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jun 2012 12:24:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=803998#comment-1817169</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Q: What do you call a Bus load of Stiller fans at the bottom of the ocean?

A: A very good start.


Bahahaha .....but seriously]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Q: What do you call a Bus load of Stiller fans at the bottom of the ocean?</p>
<p>A: A very good start.</p>
<p>Bahahaha &#8230;..but seriously</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ravenator</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/06/04/max-starks-not-expected-back-with-steelers/#comment-1817166</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ravenator]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jun 2012 12:19:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=803998#comment-1817166</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Their Oline is going to be awful, again. Love the fans who think two rookies with zero snaps in the NFL are guaranteed first year pro bowlers. Once again, Ben will be running for his life, cheers!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Their Oline is going to be awful, again. Love the fans who think two rookies with zero snaps in the NFL are guaranteed first year pro bowlers. Once again, Ben will be running for his life, cheers!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
