Skip to content

AFL could face another strike, so don’t blink

74840882JM017_Columbus_Dest Getty Images

Nearly three months after a strike that ended in less than seven hours, AFL players could be trying to make one last a little longer.

According to the Pittsburgh Tribune-Review, via SportsBusiness Daily, work stoppages are expected to hit at least three AFL games on Friday night.  AFL Players Association executive director Ivan Soto says that a strike is “highly likely.”

Last time around, the league moved swiftly to fire the striking players and hire replacements.  Which brought the strike to a quick end.

This time, one of the teams that walked off the job in March — the Pittsburgh Power — won’t be expected to stick their necks out again.  “Our goal is not to destroy the Pittsburgh Power,” Soto said. “They have been put through the wringer.”

Soto said the union wants $600 per player, per game.  The league has offered $500 per game.  The two sides apparently agree on a starting-quarterback bonus of $1,275 per game.

The league isn’t saying whether replacement players would be used, if the teams strike tonight.  “If they are going to put that product on the field to their demise, good luck to them,” Soto said.

And if the AFL players are going to walk away from the game even though there are plenty of other guys who would happily play the game, good luck to them.  Given the vast number of college football programs, the supply of potential pro players continues to heavily outweigh the demand.

If, in the end, a bunch of AFL players no one has ever heard of walk away, they’ll easily be replaced by more players no one has ever heard of.

Permalink 10 Comments Feed for comments Latest Stories in: Home, Rumor Mill
10 Responses to “AFL could face another strike, so don’t blink”
  1. jrock3x8 says: Jun 8, 2012 11:53 AM

    struggling to see where the players have ANY leverage here.

  2. bigredjbird says: Jun 8, 2012 11:54 AM

    If they strike, fire them all again.

  3. jerrysandusky1 says: Jun 8, 2012 12:05 PM

    Bickering over $100 dollars?

    Disgusting.

  4. kahnsbushymustache says: Jun 8, 2012 12:31 PM

    “replacement players”? I thought they already were replacement players…

  5. seahulk9 says: Jun 8, 2012 12:48 PM

    JUST GREAT!!!!!now what am i not going to watch

  6. nyyjetsknicks says: Jun 8, 2012 12:53 PM

    jerrysandusky1 says:
    Jun 8, 2012 12:05 PM
    Bickering over $100 dollars?

    Disgusting.

    _______________

    It’s a big deal when you put it in context. If the argument was $100,100 or $100,000 you would have a point.

  7. bhindenemylines says: Jun 8, 2012 1:21 PM

    Really going to create a huge void in NFL Network’s friday night broacasts of the AFL.

    The network will probably receive letters from all 17 people that watch it.

  8. zeke2517 says: Jun 8, 2012 1:31 PM

    Wow. They really can’t afford to pay these guys more than $500 a game? What in the hell kind of business are these clowns running?

    If no one is watching this sport now (I, for one, had no idea that the AFL existed again), what good will it to do fire all of the third tier players that currently make up the league in favor of fourth tier hobbyists? What is this business model, exactly?

    The problem is not one hundred dollars per player per game. The problem is that arena football seems to be about as marketable as snowballs in the tundra.

  9. seahulk9 says: Jun 8, 2012 3:08 PM

    jerrysandusky1
    please change your disgusting name..its not funny in any way

  10. nflofficeadmin says: Jun 8, 2012 3:47 PM

    Nice anti-labor piece here. These guys can’t live off the $500 game checks their getting? What pigs!!

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to leave a comment. Not a member? Register now!