Comments on: Demoff dismisses rumor that Rams are for sale

By: warrenpeacephotography

warrenpeacephotography — Mon, 11 Jun 2012 07:31:32 +0000

Who is the picture of? That is one ugly, ugly dude. Good thing he has money.

By: NoHomeTeam

NoHomeTeam — Sun, 10 Jun 2012 17:52:23 +0000

ramdomhaus says: “Further, Rodger Goodell voted for St. Louis both times when the league was deciding where the should send expansion franchises when JAX & CAR got their feline teams.” [citation needed]

By: keepyerstickontheice

keepyerstickontheice — Sun, 10 Jun 2012 16:30:37 +0000

It’s time to cross the Bills off the list.

Just give it a rest already.

I get the same feeling whenever I read Goodell saying the fans want an 18 game season.

By: flbillsfan

flbillsfan — Sun, 10 Jun 2012 03:35:30 +0000

Ralph may be 93, but he also may live 10 more years or longer. The Bills are NOT for sale & to put them on a for sale list the person doing so is an IDIOT.

By: ramdomhaus

ramdomhaus — Sun, 10 Jun 2012 01:58:56 +0000

@realitypolice:

Amen. The NFL will get back to L.A. sooner rather than later. It’s too much $ that will go towards paying off retired players and saving face at the same time.

HOW-EVER. You talk about the dubious ownership situations, so then you must recognize the Rams current ownership situation:
Stan Kroenke:
-Born & Raised in Missouri.
-Bought a portion of the Rams on the condition the Rams move to St. Louis.
-His two major empires are HQed in Denver & St. Louis. His quasi-third, Wal-Mart, is in Arkansas – right below Missouri.

Further, Rodger Goodell voted for St. Louis both times when the league was deciding where the should send expansion franchises when JAX & CAR got their feline teams.

The Rams’ future in LA will be on the condition that St. Louis makes every wrong move trying to keep the Rams or if somehow, Kroenke sells the Rams IP to any LA team.

Boom.

By: realitypolice

realitypolice — Sun, 10 Jun 2012 01:33:29 +0000

@scmitty2:

And I love people like you who come on here and try to compare the previous 2 situations where LA lost teams to the current NFL environment.

It shows a glaring lack of comprehension of how the business of the NFL has changed in the decades since there was last a team there.

Those franchises had terrible stadium situations and dubious ownership situations: one owner that was constantly battling the NFL and that the league hated and one owner that was a crazy lady who consulted astrological charts to make management decisions.

If you honestly think that the NFL is not going back to LA, you’re a blind man walking around without a cane.

By: schmitty2

schmitty2 — Sun, 10 Jun 2012 00:08:55 +0000

realitypolice says:
Jun 9, 2012 5:54 PM
Demoff was further quoted as saying “we’re two or three years away from moving into a state of the art stadium in the second largest market in the country where our franchise value will double overnight. You think we’re selling now?”

I know you love to come on here and show your undying love for a team coming to L.A. Forget all the tv deals, big media market nonsense. The fact is L.A. area people don’t and will not support an NFL franchise- it has already been proven

By: thefirstsmilergrogan

thefirstsmilergrogan — Sun, 10 Jun 2012 00:08:33 +0000

Demoff was also further quoted stating that “the only person who would post any theory put forward by Howard Eskin must be seeking page hits rather than accuracy.”

Sound like anyone?

By: realitypolice

realitypolice — Sat, 09 Jun 2012 21:54:48 +0000

Demoff was further quoted as saying “we’re two or three years away from moving into a state of the art stadium in the second largest market in the country where our franchise value will double overnight. You think we’re selling now?”

By: johnnycash19

johnnycash19 — Sat, 09 Jun 2012 21:11:30 +0000

The Bills are expected to be for sale after the passing of 93-year-old owner Ralph Wilson.
—————–

Wow, that was a confusing sentence. It sounded like Ralph Wilson had already passed away.