<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Lance Briggs won&#8217;t be upset if Matt Forte holds out</title>
	<atom:link href="http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/06/26/lance-briggs-wont-be-upset-if-matt-forte-holds-out/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/06/26/lance-briggs-wont-be-upset-if-matt-forte-holds-out/</link>
	<description>ProFootballTalk on NBCSports.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 20:36:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: beefbus</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/06/26/lance-briggs-wont-be-upset-if-matt-forte-holds-out/#comment-1852264</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[beefbus]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2012 22:39:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=967494#comment-1852264</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Forte would be a fool to leave mounds of money on the table by not playing in regular season games.  Briggs knows that great LBs have negotiating leverage, and that good RBs don&#039;t.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Forte would be a fool to leave mounds of money on the table by not playing in regular season games.  Briggs knows that great LBs have negotiating leverage, and that good RBs don&#8217;t.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: daaabears</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/06/26/lance-briggs-wont-be-upset-if-matt-forte-holds-out/#comment-1852081</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[daaabears]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2012 20:45:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=967494#comment-1852081</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Briggs and Forte are good friends, talk everyday. He is just trying to help Matt in his contract neg&#039;s by putting doubt in the air.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Briggs and Forte are good friends, talk everyday. He is just trying to help Matt in his contract neg&#8217;s by putting doubt in the air.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bubblefive</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/06/26/lance-briggs-wont-be-upset-if-matt-forte-holds-out/#comment-1852073</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[bubblefive]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2012 20:42:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=967494#comment-1852073</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Fans need to learn that, at times, what is best for a team and what is best for a player may not be one and the same.

Forte would be a fool if he signs his franchise tender without getting a written guarantee from the Bears to not tag him again in &#039;13.  This is exactly what Briggs did in &#039;07, and the Bears signed Briggs to a long-term deal after the season.

Being tagged with a franchise tender can cost a player millions of dollars in earning potential.  It becomes a question of simple math to sacrifice the $480,000 per game that Forte would lose against the millions he can gain by the no-tag clause.

Best part is that Forte has until 11/13 to sign the tender.  Even at that late date, Forte is guaranteed about $3.4 million for 7 games of work.  Not a bad raise from his salary of last year.

That also puts the Bears in the precarious position of whether it is worthwhile to tag a disgruntled Forte again (if no clause is given) vs. using the tag on a more important player like Cutler.

Giving Forte the no-tag clause before training camp can be win-win for both the Bears and Forte.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fans need to learn that, at times, what is best for a team and what is best for a player may not be one and the same.</p>
<p>Forte would be a fool if he signs his franchise tender without getting a written guarantee from the Bears to not tag him again in &#8217;13.  This is exactly what Briggs did in &#8217;07, and the Bears signed Briggs to a long-term deal after the season.</p>
<p>Being tagged with a franchise tender can cost a player millions of dollars in earning potential.  It becomes a question of simple math to sacrifice the $480,000 per game that Forte would lose against the millions he can gain by the no-tag clause.</p>
<p>Best part is that Forte has until 11/13 to sign the tender.  Even at that late date, Forte is guaranteed about $3.4 million for 7 games of work.  Not a bad raise from his salary of last year.</p>
<p>That also puts the Bears in the precarious position of whether it is worthwhile to tag a disgruntled Forte again (if no clause is given) vs. using the tag on a more important player like Cutler.</p>
<p>Giving Forte the no-tag clause before training camp can be win-win for both the Bears and Forte.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sillyv6</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/06/26/lance-briggs-wont-be-upset-if-matt-forte-holds-out/#comment-1852070</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[sillyv6]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2012 20:39:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=967494#comment-1852070</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If there is anyone on the Bears who has the right to speak on an issue like this it is Lance.  he gave the correct political answer.  Cutler didn&#039;t help Forte&#039;s cause however.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If there is anyone on the Bears who has the right to speak on an issue like this it is Lance.  he gave the correct political answer.  Cutler didn&#8217;t help Forte&#8217;s cause however.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: niubears</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/06/26/lance-briggs-wont-be-upset-if-matt-forte-holds-out/#comment-1852044</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[niubears]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2012 20:28:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=967494#comment-1852044</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Briggs needs to learn when to shut his mouth. He&#039;s got his money. Just play football, stop making yourself look like a moron.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Briggs needs to learn when to shut his mouth. He&#8217;s got his money. Just play football, stop making yourself look like a moron.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: blackandbluedivision</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/06/26/lance-briggs-wont-be-upset-if-matt-forte-holds-out/#comment-1852036</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[blackandbluedivision]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2012 20:22:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=967494#comment-1852036</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hate him or love him. He&#039;s been to 7 straight ProBowls. 

Yet, somehow I am not shocked by this statement.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hate him or love him. He&#8217;s been to 7 straight ProBowls. </p>
<p>Yet, somehow I am not shocked by this statement.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
