* It’s not right to say, ‘the Saints need to stop whining…take their medicine…blah blah.”

I think for the most part, the Saints fans and organisation have. I think they knew what they did was wrong, but are a little upset that it’s been portrayed that they literally had a bounty program. It literal terms, they didn’t.

* It’s just Vilma. Vilma is pathetic. I strongly believe the NFL has a number of statements saying that had offered $10,000 to knock out Favre. Vilma was part of something like this back when he was at Miami. He seems to think the rules don’t apply to him. It’s not the Saints, it’s Vilma. He’s the one who’s been carrying on. Look at Vitt, Payton, etc. They think they’re punishment is a bit harsh, but they’ve swallowed their medicine.

* What’s more, if Vilma does come back he probably doesn’t even start for New Orleans. If he does get reinstated, I would be surprised if a large percentage of Saints fans want him cut. For the money, carrying on and drama he’ll bring compared to the production, that’s a bad investment, regardless of what he’s done for you in the past.

* In short, don’t hold the Saints name tightly against Vilma at this stage of the process.

“Good afternoon to you too, Sweetcakes.”.

The NFL told Benson about this 2 years earlier and he told Micky Loomis to make sure it stopped, Loomis did not do anything and the program continued, Saints fans forget this.

Vitt’s Lawyer David Cornwell stated that Loomis and Payton did meet with Williams before a divisional playoff game and ordered him to “stop the BOUNTY program” and that Williams was a rogue coach. Saints fans forget this.

Look at these 3 things, none of which the Saints dispute, how can any reasonable person say there was no “BOUNTY” program? Oh yeah they admit there was a “pay for performance” scheme but now claim it wasn’t a bounty program, well why didn’t the players and coaches just admit to all of that during the first investigation instead of stonewalling? Because they’re innocent right?

I take issue with this statement in a big way.

Liberal judges tend to side with Union interests, and the interests of the state, regardless of who it is they step on. I’ve seen it a thousand times where privately owned businesses, like family farmers, are steamrolled by state tax-payer funded lawyers illegally trying to annex land at unfair prices while paired with liberal judges who will always side with the state attorneys over the farmer. They do it every time regardless of the right or wrong of the matter. Go tell a farmer that liberal judges are looking out for them and see what reaction you get.

On the other hand, conservative judges tend to follow the law to the letter, which usually does favor large organizations who take great pains to be in compliance with the law. However, when the individual rightly has the law on their side, there is no better judge to have than a conservative one, because they won’t let emotion or their personal political agenda cloud their judgement.

All suspensions should be recanted

But Fox News will make you believe otherwise.