Skip to content

Exclusive game audio could be the key to keeping stadiums full

Getty Images

For years, we’ve been suggesting the use of NASCAR-style access to on-field communications as a way to give fans who attend NFL games something they can never get at home.

The recent report from Kevin Clark of the Wall Street Journal regarding the comprehensive changes that the league is making and/or considering contains what could be the first step toward giving fans plenty of reasons to emerge from their man caves.

Per Clark, the league plans to create smartphone apps “that could let fans listen to players wearing microphones on the field.”

“Could” is the key word, since it implies something less potent than “will.”  Later in the article, however, Clark writes that “[o]wners have granted permission for the league to place microphones on certain players so that fans can hear on-field commentary via an in-the-work app that would distribute raw feeds.”  Which sounds far more potent than “could.”

It’s a good start that could lead somewhere great.  Hearing the raw feed of the things players say to other players is one thing; having access to what the coaches are saying to the quarterback or to the defensive player with the green dot on his helmet could make for the kind of unique in-stadium access that fans would flock to experience.

And once the technology is in place to deliver the content, the costs will be extremely low.

Persuading the coaches to do it will be a separate issue, and it won’t be easy.  Maybe the owners can just send them golfing right before the vote is taken on the measure at the annual meetings.

Permalink 47 Comments Feed for comments Latest Stories in: Rumor Mill, Top Stories
47 Responses to “Exclusive game audio could be the key to keeping stadiums full”
  1. underrated49ers says: Jul 5, 2012 7:28 PM

    Doubt it will happen, seeing as how the opposing team would sure like to know what was being said as well. You think the NFL would make cheating that easy? I hope not.

  2. ravenmuscle says: Jul 5, 2012 7:35 PM

    The Patriots were way before their time. That’s what they were doing years ago against the Jets and now the league is thinking about letting all the fans in the stadium do what they were doing.

    The league should give the Pats back their draft choice and give back the $500,000 that Kraft was fined.

  3. cincinnasti says: Jul 5, 2012 7:35 PM

    Think tech wiz football fans would find away to hack this thing and send false play’s or obnoxious comments to the players on the field?

  4. fballguy says: Jul 5, 2012 7:35 PM

    Who cares what the players say during the game? Doesn’t anyone go to the game to watch the game anymore?

  5. dannymac17 says: Jul 5, 2012 7:37 PM

    Bill Belichick is watering at the mouth right now.

  6. poolboy87 says: Jul 5, 2012 7:38 PM

    I feel like, while it might be interesting, it’d be a whole heck of a lot of trouble for players. For example, if you were just listening to a lot of player-talk…it probably wouldn’t be something you’d want to let your kid listen to.

    As far as hearing what the coaches are saying to their players? No way in hell that happens. I doubt teams want to give their opponents any insight into what they’re saying.

  7. captainwisdom8888 says: Jul 5, 2012 7:39 PM

    It sounds cool and all…until you and your kids hear “Aw sh*t!” a hundred times a game.

  8. zonon85 says: Jul 5, 2012 7:39 PM

    I agree about giving out too much info too the other team…NBA only gives you the rah rah coach speak stuff in the timeout huddle. so a filter would not be that great either… I would like to hear the sound of each play live. Hearing them pile up and talk trash after each play would be worth it..

  9. the1849ers says: Jul 5, 2012 7:40 PM

    This will never happen due to the risk of players saying something stupid, disrespectful, racist, derogatory, etc. I’ll stay in my man-cave thank you very much.

  10. idealisticapathetic says: Jul 5, 2012 7:41 PM

    This would be the best thing on Earth if it was applied to games on television.

    On field mics !!

  11. wethog66 says: Jul 5, 2012 7:44 PM

    Not forcing fans to spend a small fortune on food, drink, and parking at games will go further to keep stadiums full than some stupid in-game audio.

  12. couchbasher says: Jul 5, 2012 7:44 PM

    somewhere Bill Belicheck is drooling…

  13. okldrdrs2111 says: Jul 5, 2012 7:46 PM

    Fans should go to games to support their team and be a part of one of the greatest atmospheres, not to be attached to their phones. Those are the types of fans I hate seeing at the games and hope they just stay at home.

  14. handsofsweed says: Jul 5, 2012 7:47 PM

    They should create an app that lowers the price of tickets and concessions by 15%. Problem solved.

  15. pacificnw7722 says: Jul 5, 2012 7:48 PM

    Per Clark, the league plans to create smartphone apps “that could let fans listen to players wearing microphones on the field.”

    Somewhere….Bill Belichick is smiling.

  16. cliffordc05 says: Jul 5, 2012 7:55 PM

    The NBA looked at the use of microphones on the court a few years ago but dropped the plan. It seems there are just so many times and ways the word motherfu**er can be used until it becomes boring.

  17. clickablecontent says: Jul 5, 2012 7:56 PM

    Security is an issue but in-stadium wi-fi access to broadcast coverage and box scores on mobile phones and tablets could be enough. Perhaps add exclusive on-field cameras.

  18. knowsfirsthand says: Jul 5, 2012 9:39 PM

    This is a joke. Hard enough for these guys to concentrate and now they have to filter what they say.

    The game is great as it is. Leave it alone. Half the fun of the game is predicting what play will be next. Arm chair quarterbacking is part of the appeal.

  19. bloggingpoodlewalker says: Jul 5, 2012 9:45 PM

    I go to every game, the last thing I need is some lame audio feed,…I go to party at tailgates, then watch the game in the stadium,…losers who cant get off the couch we dont need, enticing them with stupid apps?…stay home losers.

  20. hedleykow says: Jul 5, 2012 9:51 PM

    It will be fun to hear how many different ways Tebow screams “Jesus Christ” during a game.

  21. selgaeinla says: Jul 5, 2012 9:57 PM

    The XLF piped in the coach to QB radio signals.

  22. pacmantriggerman says: Jul 5, 2012 10:11 PM

    I like my HDTV.

  23. beefsbrother says: Jul 5, 2012 10:15 PM

    I’m a Pats die-hard from the Grogan days, and even I thought the idea of putting a team in London was stupid. Now this. Just how greedy are these f*ckers anyway?

  24. egomaniac247 says: Jul 5, 2012 10:20 PM

    This newsbit to be quickly followed by the announcement that Goodell will fine players for each swear word uttered into the mics.

  25. Great Caesar's Ghost says: Jul 5, 2012 10:43 PM

    They tried this with Bush and Cheney years ago and it was a disaster.

  26. countyk66ers says: Jul 5, 2012 10:57 PM

    NBC had it right years ago when they did away with announcers as an experiment for a few games.

  27. pftstory says: Jul 5, 2012 11:07 PM

    It’s the prices stupid.

    Money is what keeps fans home. Like PFT has stated, take one years season tickets and you have a home theater for year after year.

    How is hearing the players in a headset going to change that?

    I do not get the people who complain about the cost of food. You can’t go 4 hours without eating? Especially if you tailgated? But I do get the cost of tickets being a problem for a fan to overcome.

    I believe if the home theater rules the roost, having this new “in stadium sound” is not going to change things…. Especially if the home theater investment has been made already.

  28. Florio_Jr. says: Jul 5, 2012 11:11 PM

    Smart phones NEVER work in an NFL stadium who gives a flying damn.

  29. scratchnpost1234 says: Jul 5, 2012 11:12 PM

    Just another way for the NFL to squeeze more money out of fans. I agree with the reduce parking concessions and game tickets, but that won’t happen. How long before you have to pay to view on TV for every game too?

  30. scratchnpost1234 says: Jul 5, 2012 11:13 PM

    Greeddell doesn’t miss a dollar.

  31. jagsfan9674 says: Jul 5, 2012 11:14 PM

    If we need Audio of the players to get people to come the games then I’m seriously concerned about the future of the game. I dont want to go to a game where everyone has their phone stuck to their ear rather than watching the game.

    It would take away the energy that is created at each game that makes it worth going. I go to the games now in 95 degree heat with a losing team and wouldn’t trade it for anything because the atmosphere of going to a game win or lose cant be beat by an air conditioned room and a soft couch.

  32. youcantmakemepickausername says: Jul 5, 2012 11:15 PM

    Think tech wiz football fans would find away to hack this thing and send false play’s or obnoxious comments to the players on the field?

    Yeah, i can picture it now: QB: “okay guys, we’re gonna run …… BA-BA-BOOOOOOOEY

  33. granadafan says: Jul 5, 2012 11:42 PM

    The NFL doesn’t get it. The cost benefit ratio of paying to go to a game has leaned to the “too much money” side. The prices of tickets, concessions, parking, and souvenirs are just too high. It’s as simple as that.

    The rest of the stuff they’re offering are just carnival side show gimmicks. Sure, people may be curious at first, but bottom line, the prices must come down for them to come.

  34. rajbais says: Jul 5, 2012 11:50 PM

    I get the feeling that this is going to a disaster. Usually all the apps or online plans that are predicted to be so great and get the huge type usually get the lowest rating.

  35. silentcount says: Jul 5, 2012 11:56 PM

    The best way to fill a stadium is to lower the ticket prices. It just plain costs too much to go watch a game.

  36. monkeyhateclean says: Jul 6, 2012 12:01 AM

    Imagine the best case scenario: 80% of the ticket-buyers quietly, passively sitting with smartphones connected to earbuds, straining to hear what their team’s QB or LB, etc are saying.

    Is that the “gameday experience” owners want to sell? Having to pump in artificial cheers and applause because their “fans” are too preoccupied trying to hear their $10 audio feed?

  37. neilanblomi says: Jul 6, 2012 2:07 AM

    Allow legal NFL betting at the stadiums. That is a serious incentive to go to the games.

  38. rushbacker says: Jul 6, 2012 3:53 AM

    What a bunch of crap. Seriously, this has virtually zero appeal. Here’s a novel idea. . . stop wasting millions of dollars paying marketing firms to figure out what fans want. Try using your ears, at least figuratively speaking. A few interns trolling around online can tell you what fans want– lower prices! It’s not complicated.

    And leave the coaching staffs alone, dang. You mess with them, you’re going to end up screwing up the quality of the product on the field– and then no marketing on earth will get your precious billions back. Dang. Just leave it ALONE. We don’t want the locker room or the huddle made into reality TV. . . we just want football, same as we always have. it really is that simple. The game itself is what draws and holds our attention– not your asinine ad campaigns, don’t flatter yourselves. Just give us the game. Getting the extra camera angles with the replay package is an incredible bit of progress, but the stadium “experience” truly doesn’t need to be enhanced. Make it just a little more affordable, your attendance will be fine.

  39. cubancigar10 says: Jul 6, 2012 4:51 AM

    Has anyone ever tried to make a call sitting in their seats at a football game? I have not because of the action on the field (duh, that’s what we are there for) plus you cannot hear a damn thing. So how is wasting your money on an app that is unable to be heard a good idea? Hmm, some revenue enhancing money grubbers not thinking this thing through.

    BETTER IDEA: Why doesn’t the stadium simply have an apparatus that grabs your ankles upon entering, tips you upside down, and shakes all the spare change out of your pockets into a waiting receptacle.

    Anyways, back to the drawing board guys with your little think tank. And no! You cannot use my idea!!!!

  40. vetdana says: Jul 6, 2012 9:20 AM

    For this to even be considered, the miked up player would have to be coached, grilled and edited to the point of being a very water down product of no interest…..Fans do not want another gimmick !……What do almost all of these comments have in common…..MONEY !…it costs way too much money to go to a game…..the NFL would never admit this, until the stands are empty !..Most of us may live to see this happen !

  41. grogansheroes says: Jul 6, 2012 9:23 AM

    If someone from the NFL monitored this site, they would find out what their core group of fans want. They don’t care about the core group, they already have those. They want new fans and new dollars. It’s what happens when sportsmen die, and lawyers and businessmen buy the teams.

  42. jzolt says: Jul 6, 2012 9:37 AM

    Maybe if they cut the price by 50% or so more people would be able to afford to go to games.

  43. hoosiermizuno says: Jul 6, 2012 10:02 AM

    i don’t trust the NFL to actually come up with a good idea and then make it available to fans without charge. They’ll create wireless internet, ability to hear on field audio, etc. but then they’ll charge an extra fee to the fan that will completely defeat the purpose.

  44. dexterismyhero says: Jul 6, 2012 10:05 AM

    I can see it now. Green Bay or Buffalo in late December. How many fans have to have their phones or earbuds removed from their frozen faces or ears.

  45. tundey says: Jul 6, 2012 10:10 AM

    So after they get it to the in-stadium crowd, how long before the pressure of big money from the TV networks forces NFL to bring the same audio to TV? The only thing being at the stadium gets you that you can’t re-create in your own house is the energy of the crowd. The instant kinship you form with strangers. The noise and the chanting. I have been to 3 games at Redskins stadium and even though every survey says the gameday experience at FedEx is one of the worst, I had a great time each time.

  46. sameer1138 says: Jul 6, 2012 10:12 AM

    Games are already too expensive. This would probably add $10 – $30 per seat.

  47. footballchic777 says: Jul 6, 2012 10:32 AM

    How about you lower the ticket, concession, and parking prices so this family day @ the park doesn’t cost the equivalent of your summer vacation? That would pack the seats!

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to leave a comment. Not a member? Register now!