Comments on: The PFT Preseason Power Rankings are off and running http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/07/09/the-pft-preseason-power-rankings-are-off-and-running/ ProFootballTalk on NBCSports.com Mon, 20 May 2013 00:34:41 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.com/ By: voyager6 http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/07/09/the-pft-preseason-power-rankings-are-off-and-running/#comment-1871004 Mon, 09 Jul 2012 23:25:13 +0000 http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1017436#comment-1871004 Depends on whether they play QB-Roulette. If they settle on one and stick with him, by the end of the season, there might be some hope for progress. If Holmgren jerks the spot around, then 32 is about right.

]]> By: jjbadd http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/07/09/the-pft-preseason-power-rankings-are-off-and-running/#comment-1870466 Mon, 09 Jul 2012 19:06:32 +0000 http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1017436#comment-1870466 Absolutely! I even question if the Browns are even a real NFL team…I bet #1 or #2 in the College BCS could beat Cleveland! Possibly # 3 or 4…

]]> By: turtlehut http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/07/09/the-pft-preseason-power-rankings-are-off-and-running/#comment-1870129 Mon, 09 Jul 2012 16:35:19 +0000 http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1017436#comment-1870129 Mark your calendars for October 21 at 1:00 (unless they flex it into an evening game LOL) for Cleveland Browns @ Colts

]]> By: steelersteven http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/07/09/the-pft-preseason-power-rankings-are-off-and-running/#comment-1870112 Mon, 09 Jul 2012 16:25:32 +0000 http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1017436#comment-1870112 I vote for 36. You pick the four college teams.

]]> By: bstras2809 http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/07/09/the-pft-preseason-power-rankings-are-off-and-running/#comment-1870111 Mon, 09 Jul 2012 16:25:28 +0000 http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1017436#comment-1870111 This is RIDICULOUS! Yes the Browns have a few question marks and the strength of schedule is the 4th hardest this year. But for to be 32nd? How can a sane person say that the Colts and (especially) the Jaguars are better?! Talent alone, Cleveland should be ahead of them.

]]> By: lifeimitatesfootball http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/07/09/the-pft-preseason-power-rankings-are-off-and-running/#comment-1870050 Mon, 09 Jul 2012 15:56:58 +0000 http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1017436#comment-1870050 I expected Browns at this spot: very tough division, and no one knows how good Weeden is (Richardson? Who gives a crap about running back these days? If you don’t have a “great” (that is, big name) WR/TE corps, you are a “bad team” even if you have a good defense. Which is why the Dolphins will be ranked 31, 30 or 29 at the highest–good defense and running game, but no franchise QB and “terrible” WR/TE corps. Plus they play the “awesome” Buffalo Bills twice a year!

So, based solely on QB/WR/TE “weaknesses”, I have it:
32.Browns
31. Jags
30. Vikings
29. Dolphins
28-1. everybody else.

]]> By: schmitty2 http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/07/09/the-pft-preseason-power-rankings-are-off-and-running/#comment-1869995 Mon, 09 Jul 2012 15:37:08 +0000 http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1017436#comment-1869995 I’m surprised my Ram’s aren’t 32. They could be 33 on a 32 team list

]]> By: joetoronto http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/07/09/the-pft-preseason-power-rankings-are-off-and-running/#comment-1869954 Mon, 09 Jul 2012 15:13:32 +0000 http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1017436#comment-1869954 All 5 Jags fans are celebrating as we speak….

“We’re number 31, we’re number 31!

]]> By: daysend564 http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/07/09/the-pft-preseason-power-rankings-are-off-and-running/#comment-1869941 Mon, 09 Jul 2012 15:07:51 +0000 http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1017436#comment-1869941 If all the Lions are in jail for DUIs/marijuana at the start of the season, will they still be better than the Browns?

]]> By: godofwine330 http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/07/09/the-pft-preseason-power-rankings-are-off-and-running/#comment-1869938 Mon, 09 Jul 2012 15:06:23 +0000 http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1017436#comment-1869938 I don’t see the Browns as being worse than the Jaguars, but that may be it. If it isn’t right it is very close. We haven’t shown anything yet. We have question marks at QB and Richardson hasn’t shown whether he can be an NFL runningback and we have no true #1 WR a rookie RT and no guards. 32 is about right and I am a diehard Browns fan.

]]> By: nebster21 http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/07/09/the-pft-preseason-power-rankings-are-off-and-running/#comment-1869931 Mon, 09 Jul 2012 15:04:20 +0000 http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1017436#comment-1869931 How did the Colts not get this spot?

]]> By: agelardi http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/07/09/the-pft-preseason-power-rankings-are-off-and-running/#comment-1869912 Mon, 09 Jul 2012 14:53:07 +0000 http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1017436#comment-1869912 From a Dolphins fan: “Woo hoo, we’re not the worst, we’re not the worst!”

]]> By: regisphilbin http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/07/09/the-pft-preseason-power-rankings-are-off-and-running/#comment-1869905 Mon, 09 Jul 2012 14:49:29 +0000 http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1017436#comment-1869905 Wow, you don’t have the Jag’s here like the rest of the media? Guess you have an actually looked at stats to determine we had the #6 defense last year. Gabbert is going to surprise a lot of people this year. That said, keep us about 27 but ahead of StL, Miami, Indy and TB.

]]> By: CJ http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/07/09/the-pft-preseason-power-rankings-are-off-and-running/#comment-1869895 Mon, 09 Jul 2012 14:41:19 +0000 http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1017436#comment-1869895 I know there’s 32 teams, but I still think “Too high” should be an option.

]]>