Comments on: Previous adjustments could push Matt Stafford to front of line http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/07/15/previous-adjustments-could-push-matt-stafford-to-front-of-line/ ProFootballTalk on NBCSports.com Tue, 18 Jun 2013 23:25:30 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.com/ By: chazk100 http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/07/15/previous-adjustments-could-push-matt-stafford-to-front-of-line/#comment-1880518 Mon, 16 Jul 2012 12:37:26 +0000 http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1052080#comment-1880518 Stafford is good, and a lot younger than Brees. Let’s see, Stafford:
1. matched Brees’ production last year, despite being only 23 and playing his first full season
2. in five years, will still be younger than Brees is now.
3. did what he did w/o any running game: everybody knew he was throwing; didn’t matter.
4. has as many or more weapons than Brees to throw to.
5. has the Lions over a salary cap barrelhead.

don’t be surprised if Stafford gets a contract that matches or passes Brees’.

]]> By: zack2482 http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/07/15/previous-adjustments-could-push-matt-stafford-to-front-of-line/#comment-1880484 Mon, 16 Jul 2012 11:27:11 +0000 http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1052080#comment-1880484 Stafford is good but let’s see how he does this year. He can’t be mentioned with Brees until he actually plays a couple more seasons.

]]> By: Soulman45 http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/07/15/previous-adjustments-could-push-matt-stafford-to-front-of-line/#comment-1880301 Mon, 16 Jul 2012 01:47:59 +0000 http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1052080#comment-1880301 Stafford will get paid he mean that mush to his team the First QB seance Bobby Lane what ever it take.
THE GREAT DETROIT LIONS will have to pay on their way to the Super Bowl.

]]> By: lionsownyou http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/07/15/previous-adjustments-could-push-matt-stafford-to-front-of-line/#comment-1880236 Mon, 16 Jul 2012 00:35:11 +0000 http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1052080#comment-1880236 Yeah you’re right. Not NEARLY as good. Unless you’re basing your analysis on statistics.

]]> By: CKL http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/07/15/previous-adjustments-could-push-matt-stafford-to-front-of-line/#comment-1879910 Sun, 15 Jul 2012 20:36:14 +0000 http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1052080#comment-1879910 Condon…ugh. Never have I been more in favor of my team’s stance on an agent than I was with him. They even do fine with Rosenhaus clients. They even forgave the POSTONS (Andre Carter, 1st one since Lawyer Milloy I think)before they dealt with Condon again. And that was only because the Condon client involved practically begged to follow Josh McDaniels to wherever he went. I thank goodness that Brady has the same low profile agent he always had (Yee) or I bet even he wouldn’t be a Patriot anymore.

]]> By: smstonerock http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/07/15/previous-adjustments-could-push-matt-stafford-to-front-of-line/#comment-1879878 Sun, 15 Jul 2012 20:19:36 +0000 http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1052080#comment-1879878 Playoff game stats:

Stafford: 28/43 380 yds 3 td

Brees: 33/43 466 yds 3 td

Regular season:

Stafford: 421/663 5,038 yds 41 td 16 int

Brees: 468/657 5,476 yds 46 td 14 int

One could argue that Stafford is nearly as good.

]]>