<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Preseason Power Rankings No. 17: Carolina Panthers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/07/16/preseason-power-rankings-no-17-carolina-panthers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/07/16/preseason-power-rankings-no-17-carolina-panthers/</link>
	<description>ProFootballTalk on NBCSports.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 05:16:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: jfibertkc</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/07/16/preseason-power-rankings-no-17-carolina-panthers/#comment-1881571</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jfibertkc]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jul 2012 22:40:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1053599#comment-1881571</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Are you kidding me? In what world are the panthers in a better position than the Chiefs? The Chiefs are primed for a late playoff run. The Panthers? Better luck next year...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are you kidding me? In what world are the panthers in a better position than the Chiefs? The Chiefs are primed for a late playoff run. The Panthers? Better luck next year&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pantherpro</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/07/16/preseason-power-rankings-no-17-carolina-panthers/#comment-1881386</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[pantherpro]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jul 2012 20:38:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1053599#comment-1881386</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[NFC championship game vs Niners!   Woohoo!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NFC championship game vs Niners!   Woohoo!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/07/16/preseason-power-rankings-no-17-carolina-panthers/#comment-1881154</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ryan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jul 2012 19:05:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1053599#comment-1881154</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Great write up about the Panthers, I will say I&#039;d raise my hand for the D-Line though.  These guys aren&#039;t the most spectacular bunch but with the right rotation I think they can be effective.  I like Applewhite and Kieser.  
You failed to mention the cornerback problem opposite Chris Gamble, I like Captain quite a bit but he is more suited for the nickelback.  
Still, great post, as a Panthers fan I really enjoyed it, thanks Darin Gantt. I&#039;m glad you joined the PFT team.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great write up about the Panthers, I will say I&#8217;d raise my hand for the D-Line though.  These guys aren&#8217;t the most spectacular bunch but with the right rotation I think they can be effective.  I like Applewhite and Kieser.<br />
You failed to mention the cornerback problem opposite Chris Gamble, I like Captain quite a bit but he is more suited for the nickelback.<br />
Still, great post, as a Panthers fan I really enjoyed it, thanks Darin Gantt. I&#8217;m glad you joined the PFT team.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: randyinman</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/07/16/preseason-power-rankings-no-17-carolina-panthers/#comment-1881147</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[randyinman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jul 2012 18:56:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1053599#comment-1881147</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I love Applewhite but not as a starter. I think the Panthers will go 8-8 or so.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love Applewhite but not as a starter. I think the Panthers will go 8-8 or so.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kowboydmac</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/07/16/preseason-power-rankings-no-17-carolina-panthers/#comment-1881141</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[kowboydmac]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jul 2012 18:54:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1053599#comment-1881141</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Next year they&#039;ll have to take some D-Line and a mid round pick on a runningback, as it doesn&#039;t make sense to keep two top tier runningbacks with the possibilities Cam Newton presents both as a runner and passer.  

Surprised no mention of Greg Olsen or Jeremy Shockey here.  Are they still on the team? If so, those are viable weapons for a young quarterback.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Next year they&#8217;ll have to take some D-Line and a mid round pick on a runningback, as it doesn&#8217;t make sense to keep two top tier runningbacks with the possibilities Cam Newton presents both as a runner and passer.  </p>
<p>Surprised no mention of Greg Olsen or Jeremy Shockey here.  Are they still on the team? If so, those are viable weapons for a young quarterback.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jredshoes</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/07/16/preseason-power-rankings-no-17-carolina-panthers/#comment-1881137</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jredshoes]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jul 2012 18:53:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1053599#comment-1881137</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[These rankings have a lot of in depth analysis and they may be right, Carolina may be 17th (or 7 or 27). The fact is that no one really knows. I think it would be interesting at the end of the season if all the predictors compared their preseason picks to the reality of the season&#039;s records.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These rankings have a lot of in depth analysis and they may be right, Carolina may be 17th (or 7 or 27). The fact is that no one really knows. I think it would be interesting at the end of the season if all the predictors compared their preseason picks to the reality of the season&#8217;s records.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: flapjackdaddy</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/07/16/preseason-power-rankings-no-17-carolina-panthers/#comment-1881120</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[flapjackdaddy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jul 2012 18:39:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1053599#comment-1881120</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think it&#039;s hard to argue this ranking, but I want to -- so maybe you could make a case for them somewhere between 14-17.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it&#8217;s hard to argue this ranking, but I want to &#8212; so maybe you could make a case for them somewhere between 14-17.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gmen16</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/07/16/preseason-power-rankings-no-17-carolina-panthers/#comment-1881118</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[gmen16]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jul 2012 18:37:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1053599#comment-1881118</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Jets r a better team]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jets r a better team</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: blacknole08</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/07/16/preseason-power-rankings-no-17-carolina-panthers/#comment-1881099</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[blacknole08]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jul 2012 18:27:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1053599#comment-1881099</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Good write up. I&#039;m hoping Gettis can show more promise as another big threat for us downfield.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good write up. I&#8217;m hoping Gettis can show more promise as another big threat for us downfield.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: terraj35</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/07/16/preseason-power-rankings-no-17-carolina-panthers/#comment-1881091</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[terraj35]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jul 2012 18:23:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1053599#comment-1881091</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wow thats a lot of flaws for #17. Sounds like the Newton to Smith connection and the running game is the only thing going for carolina. Defense should go from bad to okay and special teams is rebuilding...I think someone has a crush on Cam.

Also you dont think having a year worth of film on Newton isn&#039;t going to help def coordinators?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow thats a lot of flaws for #17. Sounds like the Newton to Smith connection and the running game is the only thing going for carolina. Defense should go from bad to okay and special teams is rebuilding&#8230;I think someone has a crush on Cam.</p>
<p>Also you dont think having a year worth of film on Newton isn&#8217;t going to help def coordinators?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sarkent</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/07/16/preseason-power-rankings-no-17-carolina-panthers/#comment-1881090</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[sarkent]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jul 2012 18:23:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1053599#comment-1881090</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Seems rather high to me.  They were 6-10 last year and are ranked ahead of several young teams that had better records.  Newton should improve, but the rest of the team still seems a long way from playoff competitive, which is what a team ranked this high should be.  Especially in that division.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seems rather high to me.  They were 6-10 last year and are ranked ahead of several young teams that had better records.  Newton should improve, but the rest of the team still seems a long way from playoff competitive, which is what a team ranked this high should be.  Especially in that division.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SeenThisB4</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/07/16/preseason-power-rankings-no-17-carolina-panthers/#comment-1881072</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[SeenThisB4]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jul 2012 18:16:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1053599#comment-1881072</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Being at the top of the bottom half of the league is about as best as this team can hope for.  I doubt they can ascend any further with that roster.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Being at the top of the bottom half of the league is about as best as this team can hope for.  I doubt they can ascend any further with that roster.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pnthrz1</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/07/16/preseason-power-rankings-no-17-carolina-panthers/#comment-1881053</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[pnthrz1]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jul 2012 18:09:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1053599#comment-1881053</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[17 seems about right at this point.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>17 seems about right at this point.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
