<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The PFT Preseason Power Rankings, so far</title>
	<atom:link href="http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/07/16/the-pft-preseason-power-rankings-so-far/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/07/16/the-pft-preseason-power-rankings-so-far/</link>
	<description>ProFootballTalk on NBCSports.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 00:58:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: jpb12</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/07/16/the-pft-preseason-power-rankings-so-far/#comment-1880905</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jpb12]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jul 2012 17:04:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1053593#comment-1880905</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Bills and Bucs will be playoff teams.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bills and Bucs will be playoff teams.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 49erstim</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/07/16/the-pft-preseason-power-rankings-so-far/#comment-1880890</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[49erstim]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jul 2012 16:54:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1053593#comment-1880890</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I still say that the Jags are 32. I wanna say 33 though. They&#039;re BAD! An AP-less Vikes squad would be next. Then new hope Colts... Blah blah blah.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I still say that the Jags are 32. I wanna say 33 though. They&#8217;re BAD! An AP-less Vikes squad would be next. Then new hope Colts&#8230; Blah blah blah.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: showftyme</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/07/16/the-pft-preseason-power-rankings-so-far/#comment-1880734</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[showftyme]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jul 2012 15:22:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1053593#comment-1880734</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I complained, and 10 minutes later this article got posted.  Nice to know they listen!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I complained, and 10 minutes later this article got posted.  Nice to know they listen!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lbpackfan</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/07/16/the-pft-preseason-power-rankings-so-far/#comment-1880701</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[lbpackfan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jul 2012 15:07:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1053593#comment-1880701</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[FinFan68 says:
Jul 16, 2012 10:08 AM
I couldn’t care less what the rankings are because there are way too many variables that play out during the season but I enjoy reading the write-ups. Some have been very insightful. There are also some decent comments by optimistic/pessimistic fans in many of theses articles. The only rankings that matter are the ones defined by the season. (division standings/playoff seeds) The Packers could go from #1 to around #20 with an injury to Rodgers.

--------------------------------------
...and the Pats could go from 2 to 22 with injury to Brady...Cowboys 10 to 26 with injury to Romo...Giants 1 to 30 with injury to Eli...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FinFan68 says:<br />
Jul 16, 2012 10:08 AM<br />
I couldn’t care less what the rankings are because there are way too many variables that play out during the season but I enjoy reading the write-ups. Some have been very insightful. There are also some decent comments by optimistic/pessimistic fans in many of theses articles. The only rankings that matter are the ones defined by the season. (division standings/playoff seeds) The Packers could go from #1 to around #20 with an injury to Rodgers.</p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;<br />
&#8230;and the Pats could go from 2 to 22 with injury to Brady&#8230;Cowboys 10 to 26 with injury to Romo&#8230;Giants 1 to 30 with injury to Eli&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gotampabay52</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/07/16/the-pft-preseason-power-rankings-so-far/#comment-1880680</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[gotampabay52]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jul 2012 14:55:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1053593#comment-1880680</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[tampa will move up the charts sit back and watch]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>tampa will move up the charts sit back and watch</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FinFan68</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/07/16/the-pft-preseason-power-rankings-so-far/#comment-1880601</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[FinFan68]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jul 2012 14:08:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1053593#comment-1880601</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I couldn&#039;t care less what the rankings are because there are way too many variables that play out during the season but I enjoy reading the write-ups.  Some have been very insightful.  There are also some decent comments by optimistic/pessimistic fans in many of theses articles.  The only rankings that matter are the ones defined by the season. (division standings/playoff seeds)  The Packers could go from #1 to around #20 with an injury to Rodgers.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I couldn&#8217;t care less what the rankings are because there are way too many variables that play out during the season but I enjoy reading the write-ups.  Some have been very insightful.  There are also some decent comments by optimistic/pessimistic fans in many of theses articles.  The only rankings that matter are the ones defined by the season. (division standings/playoff seeds)  The Packers could go from #1 to around #20 with an injury to Rodgers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
