Comments on: Indianapolis wants another Super Bowl

By: chitown56

chitown56 — Fri, 20 Jul 2012 17:17:35 +0000

How about we dont have the super bowl in the same place ever bring it to chicago, make it a super bowl wit snow actually test the players

By: dd393

dd393 — Thu, 19 Jul 2012 00:25:42 +0000

Indianapolis deserves to host another Super Bowl. They actually fit all the spectators in the stadium.

By: duhe98

duhe98 — Wed, 18 Jul 2012 19:41:22 +0000

The only reason the Super Bowl was a success was because of the GREAT wether we had last winter. I would be a big mistake to roll the dice again.

By: binkystevens

binkystevens — Wed, 18 Jul 2012 16:58:47 +0000

I’d give it to Indy over Dallas in a heartbeat. Dallas was a miserable experience, and although the weather fiasco didn’t help, it wasn’t the worst part. Half the events were in ft worth, the other half in Dallas, so the whole thing felt watered down. Also, everyone had to travel 20 minutes to the crappy town of Irving where the actual game was played, with no bars or restaurants in site near the stadium. Terrible experience, and I’m a Packer fan by the way! Should have been one of the best moments in my life.

By: daysend564

daysend564 — Wed, 18 Jul 2012 16:48:16 +0000

During the talk of the Vikings stadium people claimed that cities don’t make money when they host a Superbowl. Specifically people pointed to Indianapolis losing millions of dollars on the event (even though much of that money was on city beautification projects that wouldn’t have been done w/o the Superbowl in town, and additional jobs for security and related OT for existing employees).

Either folks lie, don’t know what they are talking, or the city just isn’t very smart to try to bring it back again so soon.

By: jessieboom

jessieboom — Wed, 18 Jul 2012 16:42:25 +0000

I have absolutely no desire to visit Indianapolis. Keep it in the warm places please.