<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Brian Urlacher&#8217;s availability for Week One in doubt</title>
	<atom:link href="http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/08/23/brian-urlachers-availability-for-week-one-in-doubt/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/08/23/brian-urlachers-availability-for-week-one-in-doubt/</link>
	<description>ProFootballTalk on NBCSports.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 05:16:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: bearsfan4life</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/08/23/brian-urlachers-availability-for-week-one-in-doubt/#comment-1952154</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[bearsfan4life]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2012 03:55:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1120015#comment-1952154</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[contrasuxbalz says: Aug 23, 2012 8:42 PM

Urlacher and the Bears are done. Closest they came was 2005. Seeya in 2025 maybe?
_________________________________________________________

Come on man. If you&#039;re going to smack talk get it right.

It was 2006. It would have taken you 10 seconds to google that.

In 2005 they were 2nd seeded and lost at home to Carolina.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>contrasuxbalz says: Aug 23, 2012 8:42 PM</p>
<p>Urlacher and the Bears are done. Closest they came was 2005. Seeya in 2025 maybe?<br />
_________________________________________________________</p>
<p>Come on man. If you&#8217;re going to smack talk get it right.</p>
<p>It was 2006. It would have taken you 10 seconds to google that.</p>
<p>In 2005 they were 2nd seeded and lost at home to Carolina.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: contrasuxbalz</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/08/23/brian-urlachers-availability-for-week-one-in-doubt/#comment-1951869</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[contrasuxbalz]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2012 00:42:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1120015#comment-1951869</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Urlacher and the Bears are done. Closest they came was 2005. Seeya in 2025 maybe?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Urlacher and the Bears are done. Closest they came was 2005. Seeya in 2025 maybe?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: larryboodry</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/08/23/brian-urlachers-availability-for-week-one-in-doubt/#comment-1951611</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[larryboodry]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2012 23:00:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1120015#comment-1951611</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[peytonsneck18 says: Aug 23, 2012 5:31 PM

Watch out Bears fans, go ahead and take Luck and my Colts lightly, remember u guys arent SB contenders either!!!
--------------------------

We&#039;re not?

Actually, I believe the Colts will surprise folks with Luck, and I do not take any team (other than the Vikings, lol) liightly...As for my Bears, they are much improved over last year, with depth at key positions, and should make a strong playoff run...A healthy Urlacher will help this team immensely, but his absense will not derail them completely.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>peytonsneck18 says: Aug 23, 2012 5:31 PM</p>
<p>Watch out Bears fans, go ahead and take Luck and my Colts lightly, remember u guys arent SB contenders either!!!<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;</p>
<p>We&#8217;re not?</p>
<p>Actually, I believe the Colts will surprise folks with Luck, and I do not take any team (other than the Vikings, lol) liightly&#8230;As for my Bears, they are much improved over last year, with depth at key positions, and should make a strong playoff run&#8230;A healthy Urlacher will help this team immensely, but his absense will not derail them completely.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stevenfbrackett</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/08/23/brian-urlachers-availability-for-week-one-in-doubt/#comment-1951595</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[stevenfbrackett]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2012 22:54:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1120015#comment-1951595</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Every week it sounds more and more like both Chicago and Urlacher know in their guts that the time has come for him to call it a career but neither wants to be the first to say it aloud and make it &#039;real&#039;.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Every week it sounds more and more like both Chicago and Urlacher know in their guts that the time has come for him to call it a career but neither wants to be the first to say it aloud and make it &#8216;real&#8217;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chi01town</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/08/23/brian-urlachers-availability-for-week-one-in-doubt/#comment-1951455</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[chi01town]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2012 22:04:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1120015#comment-1951455</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Chicago has changed... This is NOT Urlachers team anymore. This is Cutler&#039;s team now. Im not saying the Bears dont need Urlacher... Im saying that Chicago is NOT depending on defense to win games anymore. Now the Bears will score points an make opponets try to keep up]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chicago has changed&#8230; This is NOT Urlachers team anymore. This is Cutler&#8217;s team now. Im not saying the Bears dont need Urlacher&#8230; Im saying that Chicago is NOT depending on defense to win games anymore. Now the Bears will score points an make opponets try to keep up</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: peytonsneck18</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/08/23/brian-urlachers-availability-for-week-one-in-doubt/#comment-1951380</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[peytonsneck18]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2012 21:31:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1120015#comment-1951380</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Watch out Bears fans, go ahead and take Luck and my Colts lightly, remember u guys arent SB contenders either!!!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Watch out Bears fans, go ahead and take Luck and my Colts lightly, remember u guys arent SB contenders either!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nickswearsky</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/08/23/brian-urlachers-availability-for-week-one-in-doubt/#comment-1951221</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[nickswearsky]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2012 20:30:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1120015#comment-1951221</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It makes perfect sense to keep him out of Week 1 match up against Indy. The Bears go to Green Bay the following Thursday. Why have him play against a scrub team in Week 1 only to go to a division rival on a short week?  We Bears fans are perfectly happy to see Urlacher start Week 2.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It makes perfect sense to keep him out of Week 1 match up against Indy. The Bears go to Green Bay the following Thursday. Why have him play against a scrub team in Week 1 only to go to a division rival on a short week?  We Bears fans are perfectly happy to see Urlacher start Week 2.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gobears84</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/08/23/brian-urlachers-availability-for-week-one-in-doubt/#comment-1951070</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[gobears84]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2012 19:32:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1120015#comment-1951070</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hyzers:

Oh, even better thankheavenfornumberseven ia a Steeler fan and he wants t talk about defenses?!?!?  Any educated football fan knows that the Steeler&#039;s defense is the oldest in the NFL and Im pretty sure...and im spit balling here, that they have a LB out with a knee issue as well.   He ought to put some wood on his own fire before stepping onto our camp ground.

As for you Hyzers, your obviously out of your realm also.  Bears fans that know footbal know that the Bears play the Cover 2 for a handful of snaps in a typical game.  My advice to you would be to take your closet team and your barbie dolls back home so you can all spend quality time togather imagining that your perception is reality.  Stay in your own sick little world, dont talk to the neighbor kids, and have a nice day fruitcake.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hyzers:</p>
<p>Oh, even better thankheavenfornumberseven ia a Steeler fan and he wants t talk about defenses?!?!?  Any educated football fan knows that the Steeler&#8217;s defense is the oldest in the NFL and Im pretty sure&#8230;and im spit balling here, that they have a LB out with a knee issue as well.   He ought to put some wood on his own fire before stepping onto our camp ground.</p>
<p>As for you Hyzers, your obviously out of your realm also.  Bears fans that know footbal know that the Bears play the Cover 2 for a handful of snaps in a typical game.  My advice to you would be to take your closet team and your barbie dolls back home so you can all spend quality time togather imagining that your perception is reality.  Stay in your own sick little world, dont talk to the neighbor kids, and have a nice day fruitcake.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hyzers</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/08/23/brian-urlachers-availability-for-week-one-in-doubt/#comment-1950953</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[hyzers]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2012 18:47:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1120015#comment-1950953</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You must be a Lions fan – arent you? Possibly a Packers fan – but typically Packers fans have some sensibility.
-----------------------------------------------

thankheavenfornumberseven? 

Pretty sure he&#039;s a Steeler fan. What&#039;s that got to do with Urlacher being 34 with a bum knee and most likely unable to cover the deep middle in the cover 2? 

Nothing. Bears will miss the playoffs again and the fans will have a built in excuse.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You must be a Lions fan – arent you? Possibly a Packers fan – but typically Packers fans have some sensibility.<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;</p>
<p>thankheavenfornumberseven? </p>
<p>Pretty sure he&#8217;s a Steeler fan. What&#8217;s that got to do with Urlacher being 34 with a bum knee and most likely unable to cover the deep middle in the cover 2? </p>
<p>Nothing. Bears will miss the playoffs again and the fans will have a built in excuse.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: polarbear71</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/08/23/brian-urlachers-availability-for-week-one-in-doubt/#comment-1950902</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[polarbear71]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2012 18:27:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1120015#comment-1950902</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Being a Bears fan for over 30 years let me tell you this, if Brian is gone for any amount of time we are screwed...Roach can barely play the SAM LB spot let alone the MIC, always over running the play, getting easily blocked out of the play and not knowing where to be half the time. Plus he&#039;s WAY too small !]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Being a Bears fan for over 30 years let me tell you this, if Brian is gone for any amount of time we are screwed&#8230;Roach can barely play the SAM LB spot let alone the MIC, always over running the play, getting easily blocked out of the play and not knowing where to be half the time. Plus he&#8217;s WAY too small !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: larryboodry</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/08/23/brian-urlachers-availability-for-week-one-in-doubt/#comment-1950891</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[larryboodry]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2012 18:22:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1120015#comment-1950891</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ian Rapoport says in his article:  &quot;I’m told that the Bears are pessimistic that Urlacher will be ready on opening day.&quot;

Told by whom? His brother?  A guy he met at a bar?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ian Rapoport says in his article:  &#8220;I’m told that the Bears are pessimistic that Urlacher will be ready on opening day.&#8221;</p>
<p>Told by whom? His brother?  A guy he met at a bar?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dabears4life</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/08/23/brian-urlachers-availability-for-week-one-in-doubt/#comment-1950841</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[dabears4life]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2012 17:57:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1120015#comment-1950841</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You are prob referring to when we lost our starting QB and 1st team RB with a record of 7-3????

Stop it.  You are making yourself sound foolish.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are prob referring to when we lost our starting QB and 1st team RB with a record of 7-3????</p>
<p>Stop it.  You are making yourself sound foolish.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: seanx40</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/08/23/brian-urlachers-availability-for-week-one-in-doubt/#comment-1950829</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[seanx40]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2012 17:52:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1120015#comment-1950829</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[tlmoon2112, Jenny McCarthy left him earlier in the week. 

But, Urlacher has had a fabulous career. If it ends here...so be it. Canton, and a prosperous broadcasting career await him.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>tlmoon2112, Jenny McCarthy left him earlier in the week. </p>
<p>But, Urlacher has had a fabulous career. If it ends here&#8230;so be it. Canton, and a prosperous broadcasting career await him.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hyzers</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/08/23/brian-urlachers-availability-for-week-one-in-doubt/#comment-1950815</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[hyzers]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2012 17:44:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1120015#comment-1950815</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I hope he&#039;s healthy just so we don&#039;t have to hear Bears fans blame missing the playoffs on injuries again all year!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hope he&#8217;s healthy just so we don&#8217;t have to hear Bears fans blame missing the playoffs on injuries again all year!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: blackandbluedivision</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/08/23/brian-urlachers-availability-for-week-one-in-doubt/#comment-1950804</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[blackandbluedivision]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2012 17:42:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1120015#comment-1950804</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Bears have Andrew Luck for the season opener. I&#039;m not worried. I&#039;m more worried about week 2 in Green Bay.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bears have Andrew Luck for the season opener. I&#8217;m not worried. I&#8217;m more worried about week 2 in Green Bay.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dcviking</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/08/23/brian-urlachers-availability-for-week-one-in-doubt/#comment-1950801</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[dcviking]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2012 17:41:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1120015#comment-1950801</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@frankrizzo51 -

My understanding was that he opted not to have surgery choosing to strictly and try and rehab the injury. 

He may have been OK during personal workouts but suffered a flare up once training camp started (or got nearer), and the intensity of the work picked up.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@frankrizzo51 -</p>
<p>My understanding was that he opted not to have surgery choosing to strictly and try and rehab the injury. </p>
<p>He may have been OK during personal workouts but suffered a flare up once training camp started (or got nearer), and the intensity of the work picked up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dabears4life</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/08/23/brian-urlachers-availability-for-week-one-in-doubt/#comment-1950796</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[dabears4life]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2012 17:39:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1120015#comment-1950796</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[thankheavenfornumberseven - 

Hahahaha what a joke.  I like making statements that I know nothing about too!! (NOT)  Even if Urlacher cant play the first few games - our defense will still be solid.  Roach at the mike and Geno Hayes on the strong side.  Both are experienced LB&#039;s.  Not Urlacher but definitely solid.  

Talk about a blanket statement with nothing to back it up - you going to eloborate on that???  

You must be a Lions fan - arent you?  Possibly a Packers fan - but typically Packers fans have some sensibility.  

Defense will still generate turn overs and get after the QB (like we always have and will continue to do) and the offense will be putting solid drives together while the defense catches their breath.

The only thing that is troublesome are the injuries at safety - however Conte will be back and Steltz is a ball hawk that likes to hit (and has been in the system for like 5 years) both of which will be paired with Major (who needs to have a solid season to keep his job).  The rest of the defense is solid and definitely the best in the NFC north.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thankheavenfornumberseven &#8211; </p>
<p>Hahahaha what a joke.  I like making statements that I know nothing about too!! (NOT)  Even if Urlacher cant play the first few games &#8211; our defense will still be solid.  Roach at the mike and Geno Hayes on the strong side.  Both are experienced LB&#8217;s.  Not Urlacher but definitely solid.  </p>
<p>Talk about a blanket statement with nothing to back it up &#8211; you going to eloborate on that???  </p>
<p>You must be a Lions fan &#8211; arent you?  Possibly a Packers fan &#8211; but typically Packers fans have some sensibility.  </p>
<p>Defense will still generate turn overs and get after the QB (like we always have and will continue to do) and the offense will be putting solid drives together while the defense catches their breath.</p>
<p>The only thing that is troublesome are the injuries at safety &#8211; however Conte will be back and Steltz is a ball hawk that likes to hit (and has been in the system for like 5 years) both of which will be paired with Major (who needs to have a solid season to keep his job).  The rest of the defense is solid and definitely the best in the NFC north.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bla bla bla</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/08/23/brian-urlachers-availability-for-week-one-in-doubt/#comment-1950793</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[bla bla bla]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2012 17:38:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1120015#comment-1950793</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[He *should* have had the surgery immediately after incurring the injury. Some say his motives for *not* having surgery at that time were purely selfish, although I fail to make that connection.

This is a tough one for me. I&#039;m genetically programmed to hate everything about Chicago, but every now and then they have a player that I can&#039;t help but respect. Oddly enough, mostly linebackers.

I guess the best-case scenario, for me at least, would be for him to retire. He would then be &quot;out of my hair&quot; as an opponent without being completely busted up.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>He *should* have had the surgery immediately after incurring the injury. Some say his motives for *not* having surgery at that time were purely selfish, although I fail to make that connection.</p>
<p>This is a tough one for me. I&#8217;m genetically programmed to hate everything about Chicago, but every now and then they have a player that I can&#8217;t help but respect. Oddly enough, mostly linebackers.</p>
<p>I guess the best-case scenario, for me at least, would be for him to retire. He would then be &#8220;out of my hair&#8221; as an opponent without being completely busted up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: grabgrabgrab</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/08/23/brian-urlachers-availability-for-week-one-in-doubt/#comment-1950771</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[grabgrabgrab]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2012 17:28:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1120015#comment-1950771</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If Urlacher is done, he is laughing his nuts off…..have you seen what he has waiting for him at home lately??

*************************************************

Actually, they just broke up and now they&#039;re just friends. OUCH!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If Urlacher is done, he is laughing his nuts off…..have you seen what he has waiting for him at home lately??</p>
<p>*************************************************</p>
<p>Actually, they just broke up and now they&#8217;re just friends. OUCH!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tlmoon2112</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/08/23/brian-urlachers-availability-for-week-one-in-doubt/#comment-1950755</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[tlmoon2112]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2012 17:21:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1120015#comment-1950755</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If Urlacher is done, he is laughing his nuts off.....have you seen what he has waiting for him at home lately??]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If Urlacher is done, he is laughing his nuts off&#8230;..have you seen what he has waiting for him at home lately??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: frankrizzo51</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/08/23/brian-urlachers-availability-for-week-one-in-doubt/#comment-1950750</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[frankrizzo51]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2012 17:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1120015#comment-1950750</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The defense can get by. They&#039;ve got a decent back up who has been in the system since 2009. 

The offense looks light years better.

My nagging thought is this:  Couldn&#039;t they have opted for surgery earlier? He had to have had an MRI or two during the off-season and that would have shown the damage. Are we to think he had no swelling at all until he got to practice?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The defense can get by. They&#8217;ve got a decent back up who has been in the system since 2009. </p>
<p>The offense looks light years better.</p>
<p>My nagging thought is this:  Couldn&#8217;t they have opted for surgery earlier? He had to have had an MRI or two during the off-season and that would have shown the damage. Are we to think he had no swelling at all until he got to practice?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: grabgrabgrab</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/08/23/brian-urlachers-availability-for-week-one-in-doubt/#comment-1950743</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[grabgrabgrab]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2012 17:18:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1120015#comment-1950743</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As a Packer fan, I&#039;m hoping he&#039;s unable to fully recover and return to play until about week 3.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a Packer fan, I&#8217;m hoping he&#8217;s unable to fully recover and return to play until about week 3.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thankheavenfornumberseven</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/08/23/brian-urlachers-availability-for-week-one-in-doubt/#comment-1950717</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[thankheavenfornumberseven]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2012 17:07:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1120015#comment-1950717</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Urlacher is done and the Bears will have a disappointing season. You can thumbs down that all you want, but it won&#039;t change the truth of the situation.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Urlacher is done and the Bears will have a disappointing season. You can thumbs down that all you want, but it won&#8217;t change the truth of the situation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sillyv6</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/08/23/brian-urlachers-availability-for-week-one-in-doubt/#comment-1950716</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[sillyv6]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2012 17:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=1120015#comment-1950716</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I know a lot of people don&#039;t agree but why rush him?  I mean it&#039;s the Colts over all!?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know a lot of people don&#8217;t agree but why rush him?  I mean it&#8217;s the Colts over all!?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
